HomeMy WebLinkAboutMP 177BB; AVIARA PHASE III; Master Plan (MP)CITY OF CARLSBAD
LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION
1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES)
(FOR DEPARTMENT (FOR DEPARTMENT
USE ONLY) USE ONLY)
Administrative Permit - 2nd
Dwelling Unit
Administrative Variance
Coastal Development Permit
Conditional Use Permit
E Condominium Permit
Environmental Impact
Assessment
T1 General Plan Amendment
fi Hillside Development Permit
fi Local Coastal Plan Amendment
[ Master Plan Amendment
(Administrative)
Non-Residential Planned
Development
fi Planned Development Permit
fi Planned Industrial Permit
fi Planning Commission
Determination
fl Precise Development Plan
fi Redevelopment Permit
fi Site Development Plan
fi Special Use Permit
fi Specific Plan
fi Tentative Parcel Map
Obtain from Engineering Department
Tentative Tract Map
fi Variance
fi Zone Change
fi List other applications not
specified
HP
2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 215-080-24, 215-040-19, 24, 25
3) PROJECT NAME: Aviara Phase III
4) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Deannexation of Phase III properties to allOw separate
Master Homeowners Association
5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) '6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type)
BREHM-AVIARA III DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES ,,- BREHM-AVIARA III DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES
MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS
2835 C.ANINO DEL RIO SOUTH #220 2835 CANINO DEL RIO SOUTH #220
CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE
SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 (619)293-7090 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 (619)293-7090
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND
KNOWLEDGE. CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
See Attachment #2 See Attachment #2
SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE
7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Exhibit "A"
NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 330 P.M.
A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M.
Form 16 PAGE '1 OF 2
') LOCATION OF PROJECT: Aviara Phase III
ON THE I East and west I
(NRtH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST)
BETWEEN Aviara Parkway I
(NAME OF STREET)
STREET ADDRESS
SIDE OF Ambrosia Lane :1
(NAME F STREETS
AND J Poinsettia Lane
(NAME OF STREET)
9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE I 19 I.
10) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS I I 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING I I 1 2) PROPOSED NUMBER OF NA RESIDENTIAL UNITS I NA 1 RESIDENTIAL UNITS NA
13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 14) PROPOSED IND OFFICE! 1 5) PROPOSED COMM
NA SQUARE FOOTAGE NA SQUARE FOOTAGE NA_c
16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED 17) PROPOSED INCREASE IN 18) PROPOSED -SEWER -:
PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE NA ADT NA USAGE IN EDU NA
19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 20) EXISTING GENERAL
140 PLAN
PROPOSED GENERAL - L;QO21)
s PLAN DESIGNATION NA
22) EXISTING ZONING 23) PROPOSED ZONING
PC NA
24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERSOF CITY
STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMEBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION., 11M CONSENT,
TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE.
See Attachment #3
SIGNATURE
FOR CITY USE ONLY
FEE COMPUTATION I.
APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED
"wAc'ri. Pu ;7 0 G
DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED
RECEIVED BY:
TOTAL FEE REQUIRED I. 7..O
DATE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO.
Form 16 PAGE 2OF2
CitV of - Carlsbad I ®r$._O~t
F_
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership inte rests on
'
all
applications which will require discretionary action on the part of-thth City
Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee.
The following information must be disclosed:
1. APPLICANT
List the names and addresses. of all persons having a financial interest in- the
application.
See Attached -
2. OWNER
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the
property involved.
- See Attached - -
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or , partnership,
list the names and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares
- in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
See Attached - -
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a
trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of
the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust.
N/A -
2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad. CA 92009-1576 (619) 438-1161 FAX (619) 438-0894
5. Have you had m than $250 worth of business tra cted with any member of
City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve
(12) months?
LI Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s):.___________________________
Person is defined as 'Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club,
fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate,.this and any other oouhty, city
and county, city municipality, district or -other political subdivision or. any, :other group or
combination acting as a unit."
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I.
Disclosure Statement 10/96 Page 2 of 2
*
0machment to Disclosure Statement•
1. Applicant:
Brehm-Aviara III Development Associates, L.P.
2835 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220
San Diego, CA 92108
Brehm-Aviara Group, LLC
2835 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220
San Diego, CA 92108
The Brehm Companies
2835 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220
San Diego, CA 92108
Lumbermen's Investment Corporation
P.O. Box 2030
Austin, TX 78768
Prudential Insurance Company of America
CO-PAMG-Real Estate
4320 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 205
San Diego, CA 92122
CALPers Investment Office
P.O. Box 2749
Sacramento, CA 95812-2749
2. Owner:
Brehm-Aviara III Development Associates, L.P.
2835 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220
San Diego, CA 92108
Brehm-Aviara Group, LLC
2835 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220
San Diego, CA 92108
The Brehm Companies
2835 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220
San Diego, CA 92108
Lumbermen's Investment Corporation
P.O. Box 2030
Austin TX 78768
Prudential Insurance Company of America
CO-PAMG-Real Estate
4320 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 205
San Diego, CA 92122
CALPers Investment Office
P.O. Box 2749
Sacramento, CA 958 12-2749
. .
3. CALPers Investment Office
P.O. Box 2749
Sacramento, CA 95812-2749
Prudential Insurance Company of America
4320 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 205
San Diego, CA 92122
Lumbermen's Investment Corporation
P.O. Box 2030
Austin, TX 78768
The Brehm Companies
2835 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 220
San Diego, CA 92108
Attachment #1
Applicant:
BREHM-AVIARA III DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership
By: Brehm-Aviara Group, LLC, a California
limited liability company, its general partner
By: The Brehm Companies, LLC, a California
Owner:
BREHM-AVIARA III DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership
By: Brehm-Aviara Group, LLC, a California
limited liability company, its general partner
By: The Brehm Companies, LL Calif
limited liability company, ts manage
Jtupn11ngs '
Vice Pfesident
Attachment #2
Applicant:
BREHM-AVIARA III DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership
By: Brehm-Aviara Group, LLC, a California
limited liability company, its general partner
By: The Brehm Companies, LLC, a California
limited liability compapy-its--managç
go
9itIiming9 / / j a
Vice President N
Owner:
BREHM-AVIARA. III DEVELOPMENT S9JATES, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership
By: Brehm-Aviara Group, LLC, a California
limited liability company, its general partner
By: The Bt
limited
S
EXHIBIT "A't
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, THE NORTH HALF
OF SECTION 27, ALL IN TOWNSHI? 12. SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO
MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF. SAN DIEGO, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF
SURVEY NO. 10774, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY
RECORDER, OCTOBER 30, 1986, AS FILE NO. 86-494190 OF OFI.CIM.RECORDS.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF 'THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF. SAID SECTION 22, CONVEYED TO THE. CITY O. CARLSBAD BY THAT
CERTAIN GRANT DEED (PARK SITE), RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF'THE SAN
DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER, JUNE 29, 1989 AS FILE NO. 89-345769 OF.. OFFICIAL
RECORDS.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID
SECTION 27, LYING WITHIN THOSE MAPS KNOWN AS CITY OFCARI,SBAD TRACT
85-35, AVIARA. PHASE 1, UNITS A, B, C, D AND E, ACCORD.ING TO MAPS
THEREOF NOS. 12409, 12410, 12411, 12412 AND 12413, RESPECTIVELY, FILED
JUNE 29, 1989.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION OF SAID SECTION 27 LYING
WESTERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY OF THE EASTERLY,, NORTHEASTERLY
AND NORTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT DEED FOR PUBLIC STREET
PURPOSES TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN
DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER, JUNE 29, 1989 AS FILE NO. 89-345765 OFOFFICIA
RECORDS, SAID STREETS KNOWN AS ALGA ROAD AND POINSETTIA LANE.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 12 SOtJTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN
BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION OF. SAID NORTH HALF OF
SECTION 27 LYING WESTERLY OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
Page 1ofZ
I .
BEGINNING AT A ?O:NT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, D 7*ST
TERON NORTH 8'35' WEST 59.33 FEET RCRJ NORTH 3°5i' 00" WEST
39 3 FEET) FROM THE NoRT:- QtJARTER CORNER THEREOF, AS SHOWN ON sa:
RECORD OF SURVEY MA? NO. 10774; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SA
COD OF SURV' NO 1077.L, SOU' 0QOu WS 13L 75 T. N
87 0 29'59" EAST (RECORD SOUTH AX. GLE POINT THEREIN; THENCE SOUTH
37°30'08" EAST) 372.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY SOUTH
2 0 30'01" WEST 32.73 FEET TO A POINT ON TH NORTHERLY LINE OF ALGA
ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN THE HEREIN ABOVE MENT:oN:P EASEMENT DEED TO
CITY OF CARLSBAD, AND BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS.
Page 2 of 2
I
Attachment #3
BREHM-AVIARA III DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership
By: Brehm-Aviara Group, LLC, a California
limited liability company, its general partner
By: The Brehm Companies, LLC, a California
11. The uses for each Planning Area listed in Chapter V of this Master Plan are
the permissible uses for that Planning Area and which may be less than those
set forth in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
12. All development proposed shall comply with the grading and resource
preservation policies of the underlying Local Coastal Program.
13. Grading activity shall be prohibited during the rainy season (October 1 to
April 1).
14. All planning areas shall comply with public facilities requirementsincluded
within the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 19. +
15. Development Standards and Design Guidelines for the development of [t1e
Pacific Rim Country Club and Rc3ort4 Aviara are outlined in this Master Plan.
Master Associations shall be established for Aviara. One
have jurisdiction over Planning Areas 17, 18, 19, 21, 22,2
III of Aviara ("Aviara III Mas
association shall have jurisdiction over all other planning areas in
Master Plan area ("Aviara Master Association"). Each Master Association
shall prepare Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) which control
the private uses, design, maintenance and development standards for each
area of the Master Plan. [A Pacific Rim] Each Association may form a Design
Review Board [may be formed] which shall review the architecture and site
planning for all construction and development proposals within the Master
Plan. The CC&R's shall be approved by the City Attorney, and Planning
Director; the City shall not participate as a member of the design review
board.
a) The CC&R's shall state expressly that the property is subject to the
provisions of the Master Plan. It shall also be indicated that the City
shall have the riht but not the obligation to enforce the provisions of
this Master Plan -through the normal enforcement procedures if the City
Council determines such enforcement is necessary to protect the public
welfare and may assess homeowners for costs incurred therein.
b) The CC&R's shall prohibit the storage or parking of recreational
vehicles within any of the residential planning areas except in
approved RV storage areas.
c) The Master Plan applicant shall prepare a detailed community agenda
and architectural review manual for use by [the Pacific Rim] a Design
Review Board. This manual shall be submitted for approval by the
Planning Director prior to approval of the first final maps for the
project.
d) The Master CC&Rs shall require that each individual planning area
association shall participate in the maintenance of the RV storage
areas.
-22-
O
e) [Thc] Each Master Association shall control the operation and
maintenance of the RV storage areas, trail system, -entry features,
common slopes and other common features identified in the Master
CC&tRs.
16. Each Planning area shall have [4'5] its own separate homeowner's
association. This association shall be an equal member of the Master
Association having jurisdiction over its planning area and may belrequired
to pay a reasonable amount of dues to the. Master Association. The provisions
of the Master CC&Rs shall be binding to the provisions of the CC&Rs for the
individual planning areas and may not conflict. Slope areas within the R-1
type standard subdivisions and other planning areas shall be maintained
separately by [the] each Master Association of exposed to. major streets.
[The dcvcloperl Project developers shalisubmit a master maintenance plan
showing all areas to be maintained by [the] each Master Association [to bc]1
which shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to any final map
approval.
17. An extensive trail system shall be provided for the Master Plan area. The trail
system shall be consistent with the Batiquitos Lagoon Enhancement Plan.
18. No grading or development (exclusive of a public access trail along the lagoon
shoreline which shall be consistent with the Lagoon Enhancement Plan) shall
be allowed within 100 feet of the wetland boundary.
19. To ensure that all development areas of the Master Plan shall be adequately
served, the developers of the Master Plan or portions thereof shall be required
to provide for the construction of all necessary public facilities pursuant to the
approved Zone 19 Local Facilities Management Plan.
20. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code, Section 21.90 (Growth Management Program).
-23-
. .
2. All site development plans and tentative subdivision maps which include50
or more dwelling units shall be reviewed by the Planning. Con -mniission.and;City
Council, with the exception of that residential Planning Areas which include
50 or more dwelling units that have an approved tentative subdivision map
shall be reviewed solely by the Planning Commission unless appealed. All'
residential site development plans and tentative subdivision maps which
include less than 50 dwelling units shall be reviewed solely by 'the Planning
Commission unless appealed. A site development plan shall not be approved
unless the decision making bodies determine that the individual -plan is
consistent with the concepts, goals and standards described in this Master
Plan and all applicable City policies and laws.
3. Prior to review by the Planning Commission and City Council each Site
Development Plan submitted subsequent to the initial Master Plan review
process shall be reviewed by [the Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort]
Design Review Board.
4. The Site Development Plan required above need not be processed if a planning
area is processed pursuant to Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
(PD Ordinance). Non-residential planned unit developments will 'require the
processing of a site development plan as required above.
5. If any of the following Planning Areas, 3, 13, 25, 27, 28, or 29, are developed
under a custom lot sales program, individual site plans for each lot in that
Planning Area may be submitted to the Planning Director for approval in lieu
of processing a site development plan.
C. DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC FACILITY PHASING
The Zone 19 Local Facilities management Plan contains a detailed development
phasing program. The objective of the program is to coordinate the provision of
public facilities and services with a projected sequence and pattern of development.
The project has been divided into ten development phases. Each phase has specific
onsite and offsite improvements that are required prior to or concurrent with the
development. Thresholds (Performance Standards) are established in the Zone 19
Local Facilities Management Plan to ensure the appropriate timing of facilities and
services. All public facility performance standards identified in the Zone 19 'Local
Facilities Management Plan must be complied with as the Master Plan develops.
D. PACIFIC RIM COUNTY CLUB AND RESORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Prior to submittal of subsequent Site Development Plan applications, the developer
or developers may form a [Pacific Rim Country Club and RcGort] Design Review
Board.
iI
.
EXHIBIT Ill - i
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS
MASTER PLAN SUBMITTAL
1. General Plan Amendment
2. Environmental Impact Report
3. Zone 19 Local Facilities Management Plan
4. Master Plan Text
5. Master Land Use Plan
INITIAL DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING
Processed concurrent with Master Plan
1. Tentative Subdivision Map for Planning Areas 1-16
2. Site Development Plans (or equivalent) for Planning: Areas 1, 2,-3, 4, 8, 9, 10,
11, 13 and 14
Process and record final maps (with additional requirements for Planning Areas 4, 8 and
14)
* Apply for Building Permits for Planning Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 14
INDIVIDUAL PLANNING AREAS (other than 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13 and, 14)
Application reviewed by [the Pacific Rim Country Club & Reser-Qg Design Review Board
INDIVIDUAL PLANNING AREAS
Reviewed for approval by Planning Commission and City Council
1. Site Development Plan
2. Tentative Subdivision Map
3. Update studies and provide environmental review as required by Planning
Director
Process and record final map
Apply for Building Permits
* This is contingent upon all public facilities performance standards of the Zone 19
Local Facilities Management Plan being complied with.
-31-
.
.
Flat roof areas are discourage in General but may be used in small areas
for roof plane accent. When used, they shall receive a gravel topping which
shall be colored to match the adjacent roof tile.
3. Miscellaneous
Decks, stair wells and railings shall be predominately solid in nature with
accents of open railing and punched openings. Wrought iron railings may
be used for small balconies.
Materials for exterior decks, balconies and stairs are to be compatible with
the intended character of the overall development. Prefabricated steel and
concrete stairs are discouraged. The color and texture of exposed decks
should likewise blend with the overall community character.
Glazing materials should be a standard clear or tinted shade. Reflective
glass does not conform to the design character of this community and is
therefor prohibited. Wood frame windows are encouraged wherever
possible.
Entry doors should be of wood and either glazed or decorative in nature.
In commercial areas storefront systems (prefabricated modular
glass/metal units) are prohibited. All commercial areas shall harmonize
with the design character of the community. Special care shall be taken in
the planning of all commercial areas to ensure visual and functional
compatibility with adjoining development.
Mailbox, carport and trash enclosures should be addressed with the same
care as other structures. Their design and material finish should match
that of the adjacent structures.
Custom detached single family homes in Planning Areas 13,2-5,27,-28 -and
29 shall be exempt from the strict interpretation of the standards noted in
this section provided that the materials and finishes used are found to be
acceptable by the Pacific Rim Design Review Board pursuant to the Design
Review Manual to be approved by the Planning Director. In addition,
structural elevations for all single family and multi-family dwelling units
shall be submitted for review by the Planning Department.
f. Colors
The intent of the community color scheme is to allow for individual
expression within a framework which will maintain a sense of
compatibility and continuity.
-40-
. .
Within [the Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort] Aviara, the color white will be used
extensively either on its own or mixed with other colors. In essence, all waij surface
colors with the exception of Planning [Arci Area 28 will be a tint of white. Therefore,
the overall wall surface scheme will be based on color value rather than hue. This-
means the entire range of hues will be permissible in order to meet personal and
market demands. Stair colors will be gauged similarly. A more detailed description of
these colors and a color palette will be included in [the Pacific Rim Country Club and
Rcsort] Design Guidelines.
Optional colors may be allowed in single family detached planning areas provided
that they are found to be compatible with the colors and character of the Master Plan
are by the Planning Deportment.
As discussed under roof treatments above, roof colors shall be in the red to reddish-
brown to orange range. Color variations in a roof tile piece or plane are allowed,
provided a compatible appearance is maintained.
g. Architectural Guidelines for Planned Unit Development Detached Products
1) In projects where there are three 2 story units in a row situated less
than 15 feet apart, at least one of the three units shall have a single
story building edge with a depth of not less than 10 feet adjacent to
one of the other units. The roof covering the single story element shall
be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story element to the unit
(this is not intended to preclude long shed-type roofs falling to .a,
single-story element.
2) In projects where there are three 2 story units in a row situated
between 15 and 20 feet apart, at least one of the three units shall have
a single story building edge with a depth of not less than 5 feet
adjacent to one of the other units. The roof covering the single story
element shall be substantially lower than the roof for the 2 story
element to the unit (this is not intended to preclude long -shed-type
roofs falling to a single-story element.
3) On a project basis, thirty-three percent (33%) of all units shall have a
single story edge' for forty percent (40%) of the -perimeter of the
building. For the purpose of this guideline the single story edge shall be
a minimum depth of three feet (39. The units qualifying under the 33%
shall be distributed throughout the project. -
4) For at least fifty per cent (50%) of the units in a project, there shall be
at least three separate building planes on street side elevations of lots
with 45 feet of frontage or less, and four separate building planes on
street side elevations of lots with a frontage greater than 45 feet. The
minimum offset, in planes shall be 18 in and shall include but not
be limited to building walls, windows and
-41-
. 0
roofs. The minimum depth between the faces of the forward-most
plane and the rear plane on the front elevation shall be 10 feet' and a
plane must be a minimum of 30 square feet to receive credit under this
section.
5) Rear elevations shall adhere to the same criteria outlined in number 4
above for front elevations except that the minimum depth between
front and back planes on the rear elevations shall be 3 feet.
6) At least fifty percent (50%) of the units in a project with minimum 5'
sideyards shall have one side elevation where there are sufficient
offsets or cutouts so that the side yard setback averages a minimum of
7 feet from the property line.
7) Projects with an average lot size of 5,000 sq. ft. or less shall limit the
number of units with three car garages to seventy-five percent (75%) of
the plans in the project. Project units with three car garages shall be a
mix of two door garages, three door garages, and offset (2 planes mht
12") two door garages.
8) Fifty percent (50%) of exterior openings for every dwelling unit
(doors/windows) shall be recessed or projected a minimum of 2" and
shall be with wood or colored aluminum widow frames (no mill
finishes).
9) Variety in roof framing direction shall be required.
10) All architecture shall abide by the design' parameters identified in {The
Aviara] a Design Manual.
11) The predominant roof framing for each floor plan shall exhibit
directional variety to the other floor plans of the same project.
Notes: a) For the purpose of these guidelines in single story element shall
be defined as a plate line of 12 feet or less.
b) In addition, when a percentage of units is described in the
guidelines the intent is to have the percentage spread
throughout the entire project.
12) Any changes or modification regarding these guidelines within Section
21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code shall also be reflected in this
Master Plan.
4. Landscaping
a. Community Landscape Concept
The major components of the landscape design are the resort area, golf -course,
lagoon shoreline, hillsides and streetscape. -
-41a-
. .
5. Entry Treatments
Entry treatments are the first reflection of community character. Exhibit W-12
illustrates the location of the four types of entries. Adescription of the
hierarchy of entries is as follows: All entry treatments shall require the
approval of the City Engineer and the Planning Director.
a. Community Entry
The two community entries are located at the west and east ends of
Alga Road. These entries are the main gateways and therefore should
create a distinct sense of arrival and a strong contrast to the
surrounding area. The entry will include architecture and landscape
architecture reflective of the hotel and the central core area. Distinctly
articulated entry walls with rock and stucco, large specimen Oak trees
and groves of citrus or avocado trees will beused. Extensive use of
flower colors will create the visual excitement to enhance this area. An
example of a community entry is illustrated on Exhibit IV-13.
b. Major Entry
A major entry shall be located at the west end of Pacific Rim Drive.
Treatment shall be similar but smaller in scale than the community
entries. Additionally, trees related to the lagoon habitat may be
introduced. These may include willow or sycamore trees. Exhibit IV-14
illustrates the major entry site. -
C. Secondary Entry
Secondary entries are similar but smaller in scale to the community and
major entries. The basic difference is that these entries are within the
site, and therefore will probably be viewed at slower speeds and
within a closer distance. Special treatments may be added to the resort
and sports club/restaurant entries due to the special nature of these
facilities. The entry to the resort along Alga Road -is shown on Exhibit
IV-15.
d. Neighborhood Entry
This entry provides the primary access to a specific neighborhood or
planning area. All entries shall conform to the entry wall standards,
however, letter style, logo and color of entry signs may vary subject to
approval by [the Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort] a Design
Review Board and City. A typical neighborhood entry is represented
on Exhibit IV-16. Trees that have been designated for the individual
planning areas or alternatives approved by [the Pacific Rim.] A Design
Review Board may be used at the entry.
-54-
I S
2. Secondary Community Entries
Permanent Secondary Community Entry signs mark entries via smaller
arteries.
a. Quantity: One location required.
b. Location: North end of project area-off Poinsettia Lane.
C. Sign Types: Identification signs on pairs of walls - similar to
Primary Entries (see above).
d. Size: Copy area of sign element not to exceed 50 square feet.
e. Copy: Copy restricted to community identification only (e.g., "Pacific
Rim Country Club and Resort).
f. Materials and Colors: Palette similar to Primary Entries (see above).
3. Neighborhood Entry Signs
Permanent Neighborhood Entry signs serve to identify individual
neighborhood within the overall project area.
a. Quantity: One entry statement at each major neighborhood entry.
b. Locations: (See location plan)
C. Sign Type: Identification signs on pair of walls.
d. Size: Copy area of sign element on each wall not to exceed 40 square
feet.
e. Copy: Permanent copy restricted to neighborhood identification only
(e.g., "Pacific Rim Villas").
f. Materials and Colors: Palette similar to Community Entry signs
(above).
g. illumination: Exterior illumination similar to Community Entry signs
(above).
h. Approvals: Detailed plans of Neighborhood Entry Signs - indicating
locations, materials, typestyles, colors and illumination require prior
approval in writing by [Pacific Riml .A Design Review Board.
-199-
4
5.
. .
Facility Entry Signs
Permanent Facility Entry signs mark entrances to major public-uses facilities
within the project (e.g., resort hotel, restaurant and sports complex).
a. Quantity: One entry statement at each major facility entry.
b. Locations: (See location plan)
C. Sign Type: Identification signs on pairs of walls.
d.Size: Copy area of sign element on each wall not to exceed 35 square
feet.
e. Copy: Permanent copy restricted to facility identification and
operator name (if appropriate) only (e.g., Four Seasons at Aviara).
f. Materials and Colors: Palette drawn from the identified facility's
architectural features and related to Community Entry Signs (see
above).
g. illumination: Exterior illumination similar to Community Entry signs
(above).
h. Approvals: Detailed plans for Facility Entry Signs - indicating
locations, materials, typestyles, colors and illumination - required prior
approval in writing by [Pacific Rim] a Design Review Board.'
Facility Directional Signs
Permanent Facility Directional signs direct traffic to major public use facilities
within the project (e.g. the resort hotel, golf clubhouse and sports center).
a. Quantity: One, however additional directional signs may be
approved by the Planning Commission through a master plan
amendment, in accordance with Section 21.38.120 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code
b. Locations: Southeast corner of Alga Road and Batiquitos Drive,
however additional locations may be approved by the Planning
Commission through a minor master plan amendment.
C. Sign Type: Single-faced, raised letters on curved, stucco privacy
wall.
d. Size: Copy area of sign element not to exceed 65 square feet.
e. Copy: Generic copy necessary to direct motorist southward on
Batiquitos Drive to golf club, sports complex, and restaurant uses.
These facilities shall be referenced by type of use only and no specific
business names shall be allowed.
-200-
. S
f. Materials and Colors: Raised letters on rock veneer on stucco wall.
g. illumination: Exterior ifiumination through ground-mounted lighting.
h. Approvals: Detailed plans of signs shall be submitted to the
Planning Director for approval prior to issuance of building permits.
6. Shopping Village Identification:
Permanent Shopping Village Identification signage serves to identify the
entrances to the retail center and its major tenants (those greater than 20,000
square feet in area).
a. Quantity: One identification/ entry statement required.
b. Location: North side of Alga Road, south entrance to Planning
Area 23 (see location map).
C. Sign Type: Identification signs on pair of walls.
d. Size: Total copy area of all sign elements on each wall not top
exceed 40 square feet.
e. Copy: Copy restricted to Shopping Village and major tenant
identification (e.g. Pacific Rim Shopping Vilage/Jurgensons/Shops).
f. Materials and Colors: Reflect the shopping center's architecture and
relate to Community Entry Signs (see above)
g. illumination: Ground height, exterior illumination similar to
Community Entry Signs (see above).
h. Approvals: Detailed plans of all shopping village signage - indicating
locations, materials, copy, typestyles and logos, colors and
illumination - require approval in writing by [Pacific Rimjg Design
Review Board.
7. Street Name Signs
Street name signs facilitate vehicular traffic flow through the master p1an area.
a. Quantity: One of the two Type B Street Name signs required at
each non-signalized intersections.
b. Locations: (See location plan)
-201-
AKIWAi • L.J1It IOU • CAKJ2JiAV, LA92UU8 • (IOU) 931-UflSU • FAA (I(3U) 9iI-)I'14 • piann1ngsystems(çnctImes.net
I- L-1 .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART].
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
/ rvtP!771s
DATE RECEIVED: / i-1 bi 4ASENO:
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Aviara Phase Ill Deannexation
2. APPLICANT: The Brehm Companies
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2835 Camino -Del Rib South
Suite 220 San Diego CA 92108-3882 Phone (619) 293-7090 +
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Amendment to the Aviara Master Plan to allow deannexation
of the Phase Ill properties from the Aviara Master Homeowners Association, and allow creation
of a separate Association for the Phase Ill neighborhoods. The project is proposed for real
estate common area property management only. No substantive impacts to the approved
Master Plan land use regulation of Phase III will result.
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
Please check any of the environmental factors listed below that would be potentially affected by
this project. This would be any environmental factor that has at least one impact checked
"Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" in
the checklist on the following pages.
• Land Use And Planning
• Population and Housing
• Geological Problems
• Water
• Air Quality
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
• Transportation/Circulation LI Public Services
• Biological Resources LI Utilities & Services
• Energy & Mineral Resources LI Aesthetics
• Hazards LI Cultural Resources
LI Noise LI Recreation
LII Mandatory Findings of Significance
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City
conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a
Rev. 03/28196
significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears
in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical,
biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and
provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare
an Environmental Impact Report (El R), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously
approved EIR or Negative Declaration.
A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that
are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses
following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the
referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to
projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when
there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors
as well as general standards.
"Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that
the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed
adopted general standards and policies.
• "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies Where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially
Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must
agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and
briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level.
"Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence
that an effect is significant.
Based on an "EIA-Part It," if a proposed project could have a potentially
significant effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a)
have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative
Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration,
including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed
project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or
supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the
prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no
additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance).
• When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily
required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will
be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made
pursuant to that earlier EIR.
• A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial
evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on
the environment.
2 Rev. 03/28)96
. 0
If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid
preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to
less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the
developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially
Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a
Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared.
• An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and
including but not limited to the following circumstances ; (1) the potentially
significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier ER pursuant
to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation
measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of
Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made
pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the
impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part II analysis it is not
possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or
determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially
significant effect to below a level of significance.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at
the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION.
Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would
otherwise be determined significant.
3 Rev. 03,2896
10
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and
attached)
Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the
proposal:.
a) Conflict with general plan designation or
zoning? (The proposed project involves the
deannexation of Phase Ill of the Aviara Master
Plan, with no other substantive modifications
to the Plan; Master EIR 93-01 (MEIR 93-01),
EIR 83-02 ,Notice of Prior Environmental
Compliance 10121192)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans
or policies adopted by agencies with
jurisdiction over the project? (Environmental
Plans, including resource preservation
policies adopted by the Coastal Commission,
will not be affected by the proposed project.
The proposed project does not preclude the
implementation of the City's Habitat
Management Plan (HMP) or Local Coastal
Program; MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-02,)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity? (The proposed project involving the
deannexation of Phase III properties for real
estate management purposes, and will not
have any significant effect on the existing
land use; MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-02, Notice of
Prior Env. Compliance 1012V92).
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations
(e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts
from incompatible land uses? (The impacts of
urban land use and the discontinuance of
agriculture in this area have been addressed
in the City's General Plan EIR, and the
General Plan does not consider agriculture a
permanent land use; the Phase Ill property is
not located in an area identified in the City's
General Plan EIR as "Prime Farmland;" MEIR
93-01, E1R 83-02).
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of
an established community (including a low-
income or minority community)? (The
proposed project involves real estate
common area management only, and will not
divide or displace any existing
neighborhoods; MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-02).
4 Rev. 03/28,96
.
10
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and
attached)
Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
11. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the
proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? (The proposed
project will not affect residential or other land
use designations, densities or improvements
from that allowable pursuant to the existing
Master Plan); MEIR 93-01).
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in
an undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)? (The proposed project is will
not affect growth from that demonstrated in
the existing Master Plan in any significant
way; Notice of Prior Env. Compliance
10/21/92.)
C) Displace existing housing, especially
affordable housing? (The proposed project
site is currently under development
consistent with the Aviara Master Plan, and
development of the Phase Ill site will not
displace any existing residences; Notice of
Prior Env. Compliance 10121192.)
Ill. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal
result in or expose people to potential
impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? (The proposed project will not
result in exposure of people or property to
known geologic or seismic hazards beyond
those identified generally in the City's
General Plan EIR and Pacific Rim Country
Club and Resort EIR and mitigated through
compliance with State and Local Building
Codes; MEIR 93-01, Notice of Prior
Compliance 10121192).
b) Seismic ground shaking? (See above; MEIR
93-01, EIR 83-02).
c) Seismic ground failure, including
liquefaction? (See above; MEIR 93-01, EIR
83-02).
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (The
proposed project is not located in an area
identified in the City's General Plan EIR as
susceptible to Seiche, tsunami or volcanic
hazard; MEIR 93-01).
e) Landslides or mudflows? (See above; MEIR
93-01,).
5 Rev. 03f28196
.
n
Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significaflt Impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
X
X.
X,
x
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and
attached)
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable
soil conditions from excavation, grading, or
fill? (The subject site is already mass graded,
and is consistent with the City's General Plan
El and the Pacific Rim EIR; MEIR 93-01, EIR
83-02, Notice of Prior Environmental
Compliance 10121192).
g) Subsidence of the land? (The proposed
deannexation project does not affect soil
conditions, and the Phase Ill development will
continue to comply with the City of Carlsbad's
policies regarding soil protection as defined
and concluded in the General Plan EIR; MEIR
93-0 1, EIR 83-02).
h) Expansive soils? (The proposed project
involves an already mass graded, and partially
developed site, and will comply with the City
of Carlsbad's policies regarding soil
protection as defined and concluded in the
General Plan EIR; MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-02).
i) Unique geologic or physical features? (No
unique physical features exist within the
boundaries of the proposed project; MEIR
93-01, EIR 83-02 and Notice of Prior
Environmental Compliance 10121192).
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of surface
runoff? (The proposed project is an already
mass graded and partially developed site, and
will comply with the City of Carlsbad's policies
regarding surface runoff quantities and rates
in compliance the General Plan EIR; In
addition, the impacts of development have
been considered in the City's General Plan
EIR and Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort
EIR; MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-02).
b) Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding? (The
proposed project site is situated within an
already partially developed site and is not
subject to flooding potential; MEIR 93-01,
EIR 83-02).
6 Rev. 03128,96
.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X -
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to ano
attached)
C) Discharge into surface waters or other
alteration of surface water quality (e.g.
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
(The proposed project will not discharge
directly or in an uncontrolled manner into any
surface waters or result in an alteration of
water quality; MEIR 93-01, Pacific Rim EIR 83-
02, Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance
10/21/92).
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in
any water body? (The proposed project will
not discharge directly or in an uncontrolled
manner into any surface waters, modify
surface water paths to any significant degree
whatsoever, nor result in an alteration of water
quality; EIR 83-02).
e) Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements? (The
proposed project will result in no substantive
change in the course or direction of water
movement as concluded in the City's General
Plan EIR; MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-02, Notice of
Prior Environmental Compliance 10121192).
f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability? (The City's
General Plan El R, the Pacific Rim El R, and the
Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance all
addressed the impacts of resort development
of this site, and the project does not propose
any withdrawals or additions to the
groundwater; MEIR 93-0 1, EIR 83-02, Notice
of Prior Environmental Compliance
10/21/92).
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of
groundwater? (See above; MEIR 93-01, EIR
83-02).
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (The
proposed deannexation of Phase Ill from the
Aviara Master Homeowner's Association will
not result in impacts to groundwater quality;
the City's General Plan EIR and Pacific Rim
Country Club and Resort EIR contemplate
development of this site, which has been
approved and is ongoing; MEIR 93-01,
Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance
10/21/92)
7 Rev. 03128,96
.
Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
- Incorporated x-
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and
attached)
Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public
water supplies? (The proposed project will
not result in impacts to groundwater; the
City's General Plan EIR and the Pacific Rim
EIR contemplate development of the Phase
Ill site; MEIR 93-0 1, EIR 83-02, Notice of Prior
Env. Compliance 10121192.)
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
(Covered under the City's General Plan EIR.
See Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
at the end of this checklist).
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
(Other than the impacts described in the
Discussion of Environmental Evaluation, the
proposed project is not anticipated to create
significant impacts to sensitive receptors;
ME/A 93-01).
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature,
or cause any change in climate? (The
proposed deannexation project will not
invoke climatic or air mass changes; MEIR 93-
01)
d) Create objectionable odors? (The proposed
deannexation project involves real estate
common area management only, and the
proposed action is not generally considered
to create noxious odors; ME/A 93-01, Notice
of Prior Environmental Compliance 10121192)
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
(The proposed project will be in conformance
with the current General Plan land use
designation, the existing Aviara Master Plan
land use regulations, and will conform to the
elements of the General Plan EIR, both of
which anticipate residential uses for the
subject property; See Discussion of
Environmental Evaluation at the end of this
checklist.
8 Rev. 03128,96
.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
impact
x
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to anc
attached)
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (No
sharp or hazardous design features are
proposed or suggested through enaction of
the deannexation project. The proposed
project will continue to be in compliance with
all applicable City polices and codes
regarding circulation design which were
addressed in the City's General Plan EIR and
the Pacific Rim EIR; ME/A 93-01, EIR 83-02).
C) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses? (The proposed project will not
affect approved emergency access in
compliance with applicable City codes; the
project is designed in compliance with all
applicable City polices and codes regarding
circulation design which were addressed in
the original Master Plan and Phase Ill site
development plan approvals; Notice of Prior
Environmental Compliance 10121192).
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-
site? (The proposed project is designed in
compliance with all applicable City polices and
codes, including the Aviara Master Plan,
regarding parking design which were
addressed in the City's original approval of
the site development plan for the project;
Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance
10/21/92).
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or
bicyclists? (The proposed project will
continue to be designed in compliance with
all applicable City polices and codes
regarding circulation design which were
addressed in the City's General Plan EIR and
Pacific Rim Country Club and Resort EIR;
MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-02, Notice of Prior
Environmental Compliance 10121192).
t) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? (The proposed project is
designed in compliance with all applicable
City polices and codes regarding alternative
modes of transportation which were
addressed in the City's General Plan EIR;
ME/A 93-0 1, EIR 83-02).
9 Rev. 03,28,96.
S
C
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and
attached)
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (The
proposed project will not affect rail,
waterbome or air traffic impacts, and is
designed and will continue to be in
compliance with all applicable City polices and
codes regarding alternative modes of
transportation which were addressed in the
City's General Plan EIR; MEIR 93-0 1, EIR 83-
02, Notice of Prior Env. Compliance
10/21/92).
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or
their habitats (including but not limited to
plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? (The
proposed project is an already mass graded
and semi-developed site; No areas of rare
plants and animals are located in the subject
area of the site, with the exception of deed
restricted areas, which will remain natural
open space, consistent with the City's
General Plan EIR and the Notice of Prior
Environmental Compliance for the Aviara
Resort Project; MEIR 93-0 1, EIR 83-02).
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage
trees)? (No locally designated species are
located within the subject area; EIR 83-02).
C) Locally designated natural communities (e.g.
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (The
proposed development of Phase Ill is located
within an already graded area, with the
exception of the deed restricted open space,
which will not be affected by the proposed
action, and will remain in natural open space.
MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-02, Notice of Prior
Compliance 10121/92).
d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and
vernal pool)? (No wetland habitats are
affected as above; MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-02).
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (No
wildlife migration or dispersal corridor is
located within the subject Phase II
development, with the exception of deed
restricted open space areas, which will remain
in natural habitat open spaces, as concluded
in the City's General Plan EIR and the Pacific
Rim Country Club and Resort EIR; MEIR 93-
01, E1R83-02).
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-Than
Significant
Impact
NO
Impact
X
10 Rev. 03/28,96
S
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and
attached)
Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact Unless lmpaôt
Mitigation
Incorporated
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would
the proposal?
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans? (The proposed project is designed in
conformance with all applicable federal, state
and local polices and codes relating to energy
conservation; the project is considered
compatible with the existing urban use for the
area, as addressed in the City's General Plan
EIR and Pacific Rim EIR; MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-
02 and Notice of Prior Environmental
Compliance 10121192).
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful
and inefficient manner? (The proposed
Phase III project will continue to be designed
in conformance with all applicable federal,
state and local polices and codes relating to
energy conservation; the project falls within
the realm of urban uses anticipated under the
City's General Plan EIR and Pacific Rim EIR;
MEIR 93-0 1, EIR 83-02).
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value
to the region and the residents of the State?
(No known mineral resources occur on-site;
MEIR 93-0 1, EIR 83-02).
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation)? (The proposed deannexation
project involves real estate common area
maintenance only, and will not involve risk of
these circumstances as determined in the
City's General Plan EIR and Pacific Rim
Country Club and Resort EIR; MEIR 93-01,
E1R 83-02).
b) Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan? (The proposed project will not impede
emergency response; MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-
02).
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazards? (The proposed project will
continue to be consistent with the
substantive land use regulations of the Aviara
Master Plan, which has been previously
found to not create any significant health
hazards; MEIR 9-01, EIR 83-02, Notice of
Prior Environmental Compliance 10121192).
11 Rev. 03128j96
.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless.
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and
attached)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards? (There are no
known existing potential health hazards in the
vicinity of the property affected by the
proposed project; MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-02,
Notice of Prior Env. Compliance 10121192).
e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? (The proposed Phase
Ill deannexation project will not increase fire
hazard and will and comply with all applicable
City policies regarding fire suppression and
low fuel planting; MEIR 93-01, Notice of Prior
Env. Compliance 10121192).
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
(Development of the site consistent with the
regulations identified in the Aviara Master
Plan is anticipated in the City's General Plan
EIR and the Phase Ill Notice of Prior
Environmental Compliance. The proposed
deannexation will not affect anticipated noise
levels; MEIR 93-01, Notice of Prior
Environmental Compliance 10121192).
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
(The proposed project involves the
deannexation of a mass graded and semi-
developed site, within an already approved
residential/church day care project. No
significant exposure of people to severe
noise levels will result; Notice of Prior
Environmental Compliance 10121192).
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government services in any of the
following areas:
a) Fire protection? (The proposed project will be
serviced by Fire Station Number 4 which is
projected to conform with the City of Carlsbad
General Plan and the Growth Management
Plan; no substantive need for additional fire
protection beyond that anticipated will result
from deannxation of Phase III; Notice of
Prior Environmental Compliance 10121192).
12 Rev. 03/28,96
.
n
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and
attached)
b) Police protection? (Police protection is
provided by the City of Carlsbad Police
Department; no substantive need for
additional police services beyond that
anticipated in the City of Carlsbad General
Plan and the Growth Management Plan will
result from deannexation of the property;
Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance
10/21/92).
C) Schools? (The proposed project will have no
modification to the previously projected
impact on school facilities; Notice of Prior
Environmental Compliance 10121192).
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? (No substantive increase in road
maintenance will be necessitated since the
proposed project will be in conformance with
the City's General Plan and Growth
Management Plan; MEIR 93-01).
e) Other governmental services? (No significant
need for any other governmental services
beyond those anticipated by the City of
Carlsbad General Plan and the Growth
Management Program will result from
development of the proposed project; MEIR
93-01, EIR 83-02).
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would
the proposal result in a need for new systems
or supplies, or substantial alterations to the
following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? (Development of the
proposed parking spaces will not create a
significant new demand for major facilities or
to require substantial alterations to existing
facilities; Notice of Prior Environmental
Compliance 10121192).
b) Communications systems? (The proposed
project is not anticipated to create a
significant new demand for major facilities or
to require substantial alterations to existing
facilities; Notice of Prior Environmental
Compliance 10121192).
C) Local or regional water treatment or
distribution facilities? (The proposed project
will have no impact whatsoever on local or
regional water treatment or distribution
facilities; Notice of Prior Environmental
Compliance 10121192)
13 Rev. 03f286
.
.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
•
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No-
Impact
x
-x
x-
-x
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and
attached)
d) Sewer or septic tanks? (The proposed project
will not result in any increase whatsoever in
sewer demand . No septic systems will be
installed as part of the proposed project;
Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance
10/21/92)
e) Storm water drainage? (The proposed
deannexation of Phase Ill does not affect
compliance with all regulations of the Aviara
Master Plan as was anticipated in the City's
General Plan EIR and Growth Management
Plan, and will not result in an increase in storm
water drainage beyond that identified in
those documents; MEIR 93-01).
f) Solid waste disposal? (The proposed Phase
Ill deannexation will not affect the project
identified in the General Plan EIR and Growth
Management Plan, and the proposed project
will not result in an increase in solid waste
beyond that identified in those documents;
MEIR 93-01, EIR 83-02, Notice of Prior
Environmental Compliance 10121192).
g)
Local or regional water supplies? (The
proposed project will not result in an increase
in demand for local or regional water supply;
Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance
10/21/92).
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway?
(The proposed project is not located along
any roadway identified in the City's Scenic
Corridor Guidelines as a "Community Scenic
Corridor," and the modification to the site plan
will involve such a minor scope that .no
significant view will be impacted; Notice of
Prior Environmental Compliance 10121192).
b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic
effect? (The proposed project will continue to
be consistent with the Aviara Master Plan
aesthetic guidelines; EIR 83-02).
C) Create light or glare? (The City's General Plan
EIR anticipates residential, church, day care
and open space uses on the subject site, and
no significant light or glare will result from the
proposed project; MEIR 93-01).
14 Rev. 03128/96
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and
attached)
Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? (The
proposed project is located in an already
developed site which does not contain
paleontological resources; Notice of Prio,
Env. Compliance 10121192).
b) Disturb archaeological resources? (The
proposed project site has already been
mitigated for archaeological resources when
originally graded; Notice of Prio,
Environmental compliance 10121192).
c) Affect historical resources? (There are no
known historical features on the site pursuant
to the City's Notice of Prior Environmental
Compliance; Notice of Prior Environmental
Compliance 10121192)..
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values? (The proposed project is located in
an already graded site which does not contain
unique ethnic cultural resources; MEIR 93-
01).
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses
within the potential impact area? (The
proposed project is located in an already
graded site which does not restrict religious
uses or impact sacred areas; MEIR 93-01).
XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
(The proposed Phase Ill deannexation is in
conformance with the General Plan EIR and
LFMP, and will not create an additional need
for parks or other recreation facilities. EIR 83-
02).
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
(The proposed project will not affect existing
recreation opportunities; EIR 83-02).
15 Rev. 03/28/96
I
S
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
(Supplemental documents may be referred to and
attached)
Potentially Potentially Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact Unless Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
(The proposed project involves the
deannexation of Phase Ill property from the
Aviara Master Homeowner's Association for
real estate common area management
purposes only, and will not affect the above
environmental factors.
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)? (The
proposed deannexation will not involve
cumulative impacts as described.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause the substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly? (The proposed deannexation will
not cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly.)
16 Rev. 03/28/96
.
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or
Other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an
earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D).. In this case a
discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are
available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above
checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards,, and state whether
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant With
Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were
incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which
they address site-specific conditions for the project.
Earlier analysis via the Carlsbad General Plan MEIR (93-01), the. Pacific Rim Country.
Club and Resort EIR (EIR 83-02), and the Aviara Phase Ill Notice of Prior
Environmental Compliance, dated 10121192, are cited in responses to individual EIA
question. Please see attached sheets.
17 Rev. 03128/96
. .
Please. use this area to discuss any of the environmental factors that were checked
"No impact" yet lack any information citations and any factors that were checked
"Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigatibn
Incorporated." The City has adopted a "Statement of Overriding Consideration": with
regard to air quality and circulation impacts resulting from the normal buildout
according to the General Plan. The following sample text is intended to guide your
discussion of the impacts to these environmental factors.
AIR QUALITY:
The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the
updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power
consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the
emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur,
and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution
in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a
"non-attainment basin," any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively
significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated
General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region.
To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout,,
a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These
include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or
concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the
implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3)
provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass transit
services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5)
participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable
and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been
incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project
approval.
Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the
project is located within a "non-attainment basin," therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist
is marked "Potentially Significant Impact." This project is consistent with the General
Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of
Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement
Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding
Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's
Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of
air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department.
18 Rev. 03/28,96
. .
The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in 'the
updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway
segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2
partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which
the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange
areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the
implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to
fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout.
To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout,
numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR.
These include: 1) measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent
with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails,
bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems;
and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion, of
regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets
creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable
and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either 'been
incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project
approval.
Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because
of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-
traffic, however, project related impacts are considered to be' below a level of
significance with mitigation identified in the Zone 19 LFMP. The "Initial. Study" checklist
is marked "Potentially Significant Impact." Development of the subject is consistent.
with the current General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required
because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-
246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This
"Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered
by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further
environmental review of circulation impacts is required.
LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
No additional mitigation measures are necessary.
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
None required.
19 Rev. 0/286
Minor Master Plan Amendment
Aviara Phase Ill De-annexation
Location Map
Carlsbad, California
LEGEND
lct;:;:;;;:::;;;:(J LocATJoN oF PHAse"'
NORTH
E8