Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMP 177P; Western Pacific PA 5; Master Plan (MP)Planning Area 5 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION FOR PAGE 1 OF 2 1-) 'APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) (FOR DEPT USE ONLY) (FOR DEPT USE ONLY) Master Plan - Amendment I I Specific Plan I I Precise Development Plan Tentative Tract Map - revised [Jl Planned Development Pennit I I Non-Residential Planned Development [ I Condominium Pennit |~| Special Use Permit I I Redevelopment Permit I I Tentative Paroel Map Obt^iin from Eng. Depl I I Administrative Variance I [ Administrative Pennit - 2nd Dwell I I General Plan Amendment [y] Local Coastal Plan Amendment I I Site Development Plan Zone Change I I Conditional Use Permit I I Hillside Development Permit Environmental Impact Assessment Variance nned Industrial, oastal De^ii^B^ent Permit I I Pl^ilH3piS^ft>n Detennination t^Kpplications not specificed 3) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 95. 96.97. and 98 of City of Carlsbad Tract 85-35, State of CA, according to Map 12411 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NOfS). 4) ASSESSOR PARCEL NOfS). 215-592-13.215-592-12.215-592-19. 215-592-14 2) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE (NORTH. SOUTH EAST, WEST) BETWEEN [Batiquitos Dr. SIDE OF Alga Road (NAME OF STREET) AND El Camino Real (NAME OF STREET) (NAME OF STREET) 5) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8) EXISTING ZONING 11) PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS Eg I 6) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN fftjlE, RM I 7) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN ISamd DESIGNATION RC , N , OSDESIGNATION A 9) PROPOSED ZONING L31 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS 33 10) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION ^2573 PD (RESIDENTIAL. COMMERCIAL .INDUSTRIAL) 14) NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS NONF. 15) PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL OFFICE/SQUARE FOOTAGE 16) PROPOSED COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE NOTE; K PROPOSED PROJECT REQUISING HUT Mm-TinX APPLICATIONS BE HUED \tUST BE SUBMrrm) PRIOR TO 3i» P,M. A PROPOSO) PROJECT JREQWRING THAT ONLy ONE APPUCATION BK PILED MUST BE SUBMriTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.Mi CnV OF CARLSBAD L^ND USE REVIEW APPUCATION FORM PACE 2 OF 2 17) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 18) PROPOSED SEWER USAGE IN EQUIVALENT DWELUNG UNITS 19) PROPOSED INCREASE IN AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 2.85 131 ai3i 20) PROJECT NAME: Western Pacific/Planning Area 5 21) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Revised ^Master Plan Amendment, Tentative Map,. Planned Development 131 Units / Local Coastal Plan Amendment 22) IN THE^EfiOCESS OF REVIEVyTNoVHIS APPUCATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CHY STAFF, PLANNINGCDMMKSIQNERi, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS. OR CHY COUNQL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPE^^fH/W IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPUCATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE ^^-"^iL-^ 1 . |ig<QXTUR£ D.L. Clemens/Vice President 23) OWNER 24) APPUCANT NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) Aviara Land Associates Limited Partner NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) Aviara Land Associates Limited Pai^tnei "^il^Faf^mar Airport Road #206 ^ffff^'i^omar Airport Road #206 CITY AND STATE ZIP Carlsbad, CA 92009 TELEPHONE 931-1190 CITY AND STATE ZIP Carlsbad, CA 92009 TELEPHONE 931-1190 1 CERTITf THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER Mto THAT ALL THE ABOVE rNFORMATTOW IS TRUE ANDCQiWfei\rOTHEBESror MY KNOWLEDGE. , SIGNi^rWRE I DATE ^ yf/^. 8/10/95 1 CERTTrr THATI AM THE OCAL OWNEin REPRESENTATIVE AND THAT AU THE ABOVE INTORMATION ts TKUE AND OORSECT TO THE BEST Of MY I DATE i ^ , 8/10/95 FOR CnY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION: APPUCATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED M£ 6V_ TOTAL FEE REQUI; DATE FEE PAID S661 V I 9nv DATE STAMP APPUCATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: RECEIPT NO. City of CarisbaH me DISCLOSURE STATEMENT iPO'jONTS STATsMENT OF QISCLCSUPg OF CcSTAlN OWNERSHIP INTEPESTS ON AU. APPUCAT10NS WHICH WILL SecuiPS C;SCS£TiaNAPY ACTION ON THE PAST CF THE C.TV CCUNCIU. OB ANY APPOlNTiD aOASO. COWMISSICN OP CCMMrTT== (Please Print) Tha fcllowing information must be disclosed: 1. Applicant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership 2011 Palomar Airport Road Suite 206 Carlsbad. CA 92009 Owner List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership 2011 Palomar Airport Road Suite 206 Carlsbad, CA q7nnQ 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporat'on or partnership, list the names and addresses of ail individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership, N/A 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. FRM00013 8/90 2075 Las Palmas Orivo - Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 • (619) 438-1161 Iti im^BAI^CAUFORI Iff. • 1-'- * DATE. ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION 3168 08/14/95 rool 01 02 -PRH^MOttNlL.OO 7 ^ i ri ^J/•hOJ r 2^ RECEIPT NO. 16569 I Piimed oa ncycled ffi. NOT VAUD UNLESS VALIDATED BY CASH REGISTER TOTAL r AVIARA MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT (The following amendments are proposed to the Aviara Master Plan in order to add cluster single family units as a permitted use to Planning Area 5, and to add development standards for such units. The proposed development standards are based upon similar standards contained in the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. A new exhibit, designated as Exhibit V-6a., is also included to graphically depict the concept of clustered single family housing. Proposed additions to the existing Master Plan text are shown in redline deletions are shown in strikeout type. The proposed amendments begin on Page 89 of the Master Plan document.) Planning Area 5: Multi-Familv and Cluster Single fmi^y Residential: Description: This 23.8 acre planning area located along the south side of Alga Road permits multi-family homes and cluster single family homes. A 150 foot wide public utility easement serves as an open space buffer with Planning Area 4 to the northeast. Development Standards: PD All development in Planning Area 5 shall conform to the development standards of the PD ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 21.45.090) unless other wise noted in this chapter. Use Allocation: Maximum of 189 residential units. (7.9 DU/AC) Private recreation facilities are required in conjunction with the residential units. Permitted Uses: Multi-family residential and cluster single family housing along with passive and active recreational uses. Site Development Standards: Height: Multi-famtily Bousitlg: The maximum height shall not exceed 35 feet. All heights shall be determined per Section 21.040.065 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. At least 50% of the structures in this Planning Area shall be no more than two stories in height. Where three story structures are proposed, no more than one-half of the structure shall be three stories in height. Cluster singh family housing: A maiximum of 30 feet and two stories shstll be allowed if a, tnininium mat pitch, of 3/12 is provided. Building Height shall be measHred per the definition contained in Section 2104.065 of the Carlsbad Munidpa! Code, Setbacks: Multi*family housing setbacks: The minimum setback from Alga Road and Pacific Rim Drive for all structures shall be 50 feet. All parking shall be setback a minimum of 35 feet from Alga Road provided that it is fully screened. All other front yard setbacks shall be per Section 21.45.090(b) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. All structures shall be setback a minimum of 20 feet from the pubhc utility easement. Minimum building separation is 10 feet between one-story structures, 15 feet between one and two-story structures and 20 feet for two or more story structures. All structures and parking shall be setback a minimum of 20 feet from all internal streets. Cluster single family housing setbacks: The minimum setback from Alga Road for all structures shall be 50 feet. The minimum setback from Batiquitos Drive shall be 30 feet for all structures. Minimum distance between homes on common lots shall be 10 feel excluding architectural feature intrusions as allowed by Section 21.45.09(o)5 of the Carlsbad Mtmicipai Code (Planned Development Ordinance). Garages shall be setback a minimum of 1$ feet from private drives, and garages facing out onto a private or public street shall be setbaclt a minimum of 20 feet. Driveways for clustered single family servmg four units or less may be 24 feet in width. All structures shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from private streets excluding architectural feature intrusions as described by Section ZlASX)90(b)5 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Planned Development Ordinance). Parking: Parking shall conform to the standards of Chapter 21.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Special Design Criteria: Design: All community-wide design standards described in Section A of Chapter IV shall be embodied in the architecture of this planning area. The following specific guidelines shall also be included for this planning area: o As shown on the conceptual site plan for this planning area, the existing natural slopes and tree groves shall be preserved. o Strong architectural relief features shall be incorporated into all structures visible from Alga Road and Pacific rim Drive. o Views to and from the lagoon and back-country shall be preserved. Curvilinear streets shall be combined with informal building sitings to strengthen the mediterranean hilltown appearance of the planning area. A variety of building massings is encouraged. Outdoor courtyards, patios and plazas should be included. Special attention shall be given to incorporate the adjacent open space area as an amenity to the neighborhood. For cluster single family homes the mimmum lineal dimension of outdoor private use areas shall be 10 feet provided that the private use area shall ml be less than 30D square feet and this area shall not be counted toward satlsfjfing recreational area requirements. However, a minimum IS foot by 15 foot outdoor private use area may be provided for each unit to be counted toward satisfying recreation area requirements pursuant to section 21.45,090 of the Planned Development Ordinance. (the balance of the chapter for Planning Area 5 would remain unchanged) 2^ m 3 . c z •o > 3D m > 01 m X z S H NOTE: SEE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR PROVISIONS OF PRIVATE RECREATION AREAS. MINIMUM LINEAL DIMENSION SHALL BE 10 FEET. NOTE: THEIR ARE NO INDIVIDUAL LOT LINES SEPARATING HOUSES, THE UNITS MAY BE AIR SPACE CONDOS OR A SIMILAR TYPE OF OWNERSHIP CONCEPT NQfljCE OF PUBUC HEARING COUNTY CLHK Mail to: County Clerk, County of San DiiPf PO Box 1750, San Diego, CA 92112-414^ Public Hearing Date: NOVEMBER 15. 1995 Response must be received by: NOVEMBEI^14. ^5 |^ % " \^ Public Hearing Place: 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE. CARLSBAD. CA 92008 areoory J smith Re/^c^^jierk Public Hearing Time: _6i00RML_ GCfTlJW^'^ Proiect Title; AVL\RA PLANNING AREA 5 - WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING ^'^^^"^ Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD Contact Person: Eric Munoz Street Address: 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE Phone: ^619) 438-1161 exteflsiOB 4441 Citv: CARLSBAD Zip: 92009 Countv: SAN DIEGO COUNTY PR^jTcfToCATIONT County: SAN DIEGO City/Nearest Community: Cross Street: Alga Road/Batiquitos Drive CARLSBAD Total Acres: 24 Twp.: Range: Assessor's Parcel No.: 215-592-12.13.14.15 Section: Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: 1-5 Waterways: Batiquitos Lagoon/Pacific Ocean Base: Airports: MCCLELLAN/PALOMAR Raihways: NCTD Schools: Aviara Oaks ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT NOP Early Cons Neg Dec Draft EIR Supplement/Subsequent "EIR (Prior to SCH No.) . Other Prior Compliance LOCAL ACnON TYPE Genera Plan Update General Plan Amendment General Plan Element Zone Code Amendment Specific Plan X Master Plan Amendment X Planned Unit Development Site Plan Rezone Use Permit X Land Division (Subdivision, Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) Annexation Redevelopment Coastal Permit "other LCPA Amendment DEVELOPMENT TYPE X Residential: Office: Commercial: Industrial: Recreational: Units _ Sq. Ft.. Sq. Ft.. Sq. Ft.. 131 Acres 24 Acres Acres Acres PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT AestheticA'isual Flood Plain/Flooding Agricultural Land Forest Land/Fire Hazard Air Quality Geologic/Seismic Archaeological/Historical Minerals Coastal Zone Noise Drainage/Absorption Populations/Housing Balance Economic/Jobs Public Services/Facilities Fiscal Recreation/Parks Schools/Universities Septic Systems Sewer Capacity Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading 'Solid Waste Toxic/Hazardous TrafiQc/Circulation Vegetation Water Quality Water Supply/Ground Water Wetland/Riparian 'wildlife Growth Inducing Landuse Cumulative Effect Other Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Use Aviara Master Plan currently allows 189 multi-family units for PA 5. Project Description Current approval for PA 5 allows 147 multi-family units. This project proposes amendments to allow 131 units of a new product of detached clustered single family unit. — -r—" 1 clustered single family unit. FELED IW THE 0FPIC3 OF THB COUNTY OtfiRK, Where documents are located for Public Revi< w. Community Development Center, 2075. Las (Padmas Drive, Carl EM:kc type POST-cQCXXe 1 99? EimOVED BSTT - SD TO .ALGEHCY ON <(/>^n^ DEPUTY Carlsjjad, CA 92009 July 1994 HI (% i( Caridiad Planii^ Departneit A REPORT TO TM PLAMfi CO«M Item No. ® P.C. AGENDA OF: NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Apphcation complete date: September 20, 1995 Project Planner Erie Munoz Project Engineer Jim Davis SUBJECT: MP 177rP)/LCPA 95-11/CT 90-09(A)/CP 95-01 • AVIARA PA 5. WESTERN PACIFIC - Request for a revision to an existing tentative map approval for Planning Area 5 in the Aviara Master Plan which allows 147 multi-family dwelling units on the pre-graded 24 acre site. The revision request proposes a clustered single family product type with a total of 131 dwelling units. Also involved is a new condominium permit, a major master plan amendment and a local coastal program amendment. The Aviara Master Plan is located in P- C (Planned Community) zoned property located west of El Camino Real, north of the Batiquitos Lagoon in the Southwest Quadrant of the City, in the Coastal 2^ne, within Local Facilities Management Zone 19. I. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3833, 3834, 3835 , and 3836, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Master Plan Amendment MP 177(P), Local Coastal Program Amendment LCPA 95-11, Tentative Tract Map Revision CT 90- 09(A), and Condominium Permit CP 95-01 respectively, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The subject site is already approved for 147 multi-family dwelling units (CT 90-09). This project proposes to change the product type and develop the site with 131 clustered, detached single family units. The new air space ownership product type complies with most of the applicable standards of the Planned Development Ordinance, however, the allowance for a 24 foot wide driveway to serve each 4 unit cluster is central to the design of the proposed product type and requires specific development standards to be written into the Aviara Master Plan for this planning area. Changes to the master plan text and graphics will address the project issues as summarized below: • Allowed use/product change from multi-family to clustered single family; • Specific development standards for new product type established for PA 5; • Master Plan trail segment in adjacent SDG&E easement is triggered by PA 5; and • Qean up of graphics to accurately depict the boundaiy between PA 4 and 5. MP 177(P)/LCPA 95-ll/cA-09(A)/CP 95-01 AVIARA PA 5, WESTERN PACIFIC NOVEMBER 15, 1995 PAGE 2 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The site for PA 5 is currently mass graded into three pad areas and certain improvements are already in place including the Alga Road (site's northern edge), Batiquitos Drive (site's westem edge), Hummingbird Road (bisects southem portion of site) and Rock Dove Street public street systems. Sidewalks and the required noise attenuation wall along Alga Road are also currently in place. In the eastem portion of the site is the SDG&E easement with the existing development of Planning Area 4 located beyond. The three graded pads that comprise PA 5 are located as follows: two pads adjacent to Batiquitos Drive on the west perimeter of the site and a third pad separated from the other two by a large slope containing native vegetation and nine (9) large oak trees. These oak trees were conditioned to be retained with the current approved of PA 5 and that same condition has been placed on this amended project (Condition No. 20 of Resolution No. 3835). This project proposes a new product type for Planning Area 5 with new development standards written into the master plan specifically for this planning area. The new product type is a clustered, detached sin^e fanoily concept where a 32 foot wide intemal private street system serves the planning area (in addition to the existing public streets). Guest parking is allowed on one side of this intemal private street. Coming off of the 32 foot private street are 24 foot wide courtyards/driveways which access a maximum cluster of four units. Each of these four unit clusters are typically separated on the site plan by a unit that faces directly out onto the 32 foot wide private street. These units have garages that observe a 20 foot private street setback measured from the back of the sidewalk. A typical four unit cluster layout is provided on Exhibit "D" while the site plan/tentative map e^diibits, Exhibits "B" and "C depict the entire site layout. The new development standards and product type provisions are proposed via master plan text changes and the introduction of a graphic depicting the typical four unit detached cluster product type for the Planning Area 5 chapter of the Aviara Master Plan. These proposed master plan text changes are attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 3833, as Exhibit "X", dated November 15, 1995. Other components of the master plan amendment include: a clarification of the trail constmction requirement for the SDG&E powerline easement located within PA 5; and a correction of existing graphics within the Aviara Master Plan (SDG&E powerline easement is inaccurately shown within PA 4). Since a coastal zone master plan is involved, the change to the master plan requires a change to the Local Coastal Program which is being proposed via LCPA 95-11. TTie new air space ownership product type requires a condominium permit (CP 95-01) and the existing tentative map must be amended (CT 90-09(A)). Three plan types are proposed ranging in size as follows: Plan 1, 2,290 square feet (sq. ft.); Plan 2, 2,350 sq. ft.; and Plan 3, 2,716 sq. ft. All units have a two car garage. Contemporaiy concrete tile and stucco wall architecture is proposed with adequate articulation and roof line variation. Maximum building height proposed is 26 feet. The proposed building elevations for the three plans are shown on Exhibits "E" - "J". The proposed floor plans for the three plans are shown on Exhibits "K" - "M". MP 177(P)/LCPA 95-ll/cA-09(A)/CP 95-01 ^ AVL\RA PA 5. WESTERN PACIFIC NOVEMBER 15,1995 PAGE 3 Each unit features a 15 by 15 foot minimum rear yard area. Several units exceed this minimum. The common active recreation area requirement for this project is satisfied via the two proposed active recreation areas. As shown on the tentative map (Ediibits "B" and "C) Euid landscape exhibit (Exhibit "O"), one active area provides a shuffieboard court and another active area provides a swimming pool. Ediibit "N" depicts the proposed elevations and floor plans for the pool equipment room/restroom facility. A balanced, finish grading concept is proposed for the development of the mass graded site which involves 25,900 cubic yards of cut and fill. Affordable housing requirements for the development of this planning area have already been satisfied at a master plan scale. IV. ANALYSIS The project is subject to the following analysis and/or regulations: A. Is the proposed master plan amendment and related product type and development standard modifications consistent with Chapter 21.38 (Planned Community Zones, which require master plans) of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the intent and purpose of the Aviara Master Plan? B. Is the proposed local coastal program amendment consistent with the City's coastal regulations and local coastal program segments? C. Is the proposed tentative map revision consistent with Titie 20 (Subdivision Ordinance), the Aviara Master Plan and the City's General Plan? D. Is the proposed condominium pemiit consistent with Chapter 21.45 (Planned Development Ordinance) of the City's Zoning Ordinance? E. Is the proposal consistent with the City's Growth Management Program? A. Master Plan Amendment - MP 177(P) A master plan amendment is required because a new product type (clustered single family) and new development standards for PA 5 are proposed. Currently up to 189 multi-family dwelling units are allowed; 131 clustered single family units are proposed. The new development standards appear as master plan text changes which are attached as Exhibit "X" to the resolution for MP 177(P), Planning Commission Resolution No. 3833. These development standards allow the proposed product type. The allowance for a 24 foot wide driveway to serve four units or less is a departure from current Planned Development Ordinance allowances, yet has been allowed in the City in certain master plan areas. This is consistent with the code because, where a conflict in regulation occurs, the regulations specified in the approved master plan shall control per Chapter 21.38.030(d). All other Planned Development standards and guidelines apply. The components of the new standards/proposed master plan amendment are summarized below: MF 177(P)/LCPA 95-ll/C^-09(A)/CP 95-01 ^ AVIARA PA 5, WESTERN PACmC NOVEMBER 15, 1995 PAGE 4 • The allowance for a 24 foot wide courtyard/driveway to serve a maximum of four units (30 feet is the current minimum driveway/street width per the PD Ordinance). The requirement of a 15 by 15 foot minimum dimensioned private passive recreation area per unit. A 32 foot wide private street with guest parking allowed on one side (currently allowed by PD Ordinance). Establishment of setbacks and building separation requirements (consistent with Planned Development provisions). Elimination of attached multi-family residential units as an allowed use. Elimination and reduction of 35 foot height limit to 30 feeV2 stories for the single family style product type proposed. Garification of PA 5's trail constmction requirement relative to the granting of occupancy for units in PA 5. Correction of location maps for PA 4 and 5 in the Aviara master plan; the SDG&E powerline easement currentiy is incorrectiy shown as a part of PA 4. This master plan amendment will correct this and show the SDG&E easement within PA 5. In addition, a graphic is proposed for the master plan text (also attached to Resolution No. 3833) which depicts a typical four unit single family cluster layout. The proposed master plan amendment qualifies as a major master plan amendment per Chapter 21.38 (PC Zone) of the Zoning Ordinance. All applicable provisions of the PC zone are complied with. The intent and purpose of the Aviara Master Plan with regards to PA 5 was to accommodate up to 189 multi-family residential units; the existing approval is for 147 multi-family units. The proposal still involves a residential development at a similar density (147 vs. 131 units). The primaiy change is the product type shift which is more desirable to the property owners; and acceptable to staff as proposed and conditioned. Therefore, the basic intent and purpose of the Aviara Master Plan for residential development at the proposed density on PA 5 is maintained by the proposed project and related master plan amendment. B. Local Coastal Program Amendment - LCPA 95-11 Located within the Mello I segment of the City's LCP, the project site has already been approved for development. Coastal Deed Restricted areas area noted on the tentative map e?^ibits and no encroachment or grading into these areas is proposed/allowed. No changes to coastal zone goals, policies or objectives are proposed; only development standard changes to PA 5 to allow the new product type. An amendment to the LCP is required MP 177(P)/LCPA 95-ll/C:ft-09(A)/CP 95-01 AVIARA PA 5, WESTERN PACIFIC NOVEMBER 15, 1995 PAGE 5 . since the Aviara Master Plan, as a coastal zone master plan, is the implementing ordinance for this segment of the LCP. The product type change and new development standards for PA 5 to allow the proposed detached, clustered single family product type qualifies as an amendment to the LCP to maintain consistency with the City Zoning Ordinance (Aviara Master Plan) and General Plan. After final City approval, the project will be submitted to the Coastal Commission for processing of the LCP amendment. C. Tentative Map Revision - CT 90-09(A) The proposed subdivision of PA 5 involves 20 residential lots, two active recreation area lots, and eleven open space lots. The 20 residential lots will acconmiodate 131 air space ownership units. The residential lots as shown on Exhibits "B" and "C equate with a potential phasing of development with each lot typically containing at least one cluster of four units. The open space lots cover SDG&E easement area, and common open space and slope areas. Maintenance for these areas is the responsibility of either the planning area Homeowners Association (HOA) or the Aviara Master Plan Master HOA as noted on the water conservation plan exhibit, Exhibit "P". As proposed, the tentative tract map amendment meets the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance - Titie 20, and all applicable Engineering standards. The development of PA 5 with 131 residential dwelling units and the proposed product type will be consistent with the Aviara Master Plan (pending concurrent approval ofthis project's master plan amendment, MP 177(P)). By implementing an approved master plan, this project is therefore inherentiy consistent with the City's General Plan. Continued buildout of the Aviara Master Plan is a goal of General Plan. D. Condominium Permit - CP 95-01 A condominium pemiit is being proposed for the development of 131 air space ownership units pursuant to the City's Planned Development (PD) Ordinance. The project complies with the applicable regulations of the PD Ordinance including residential parking requirements, guest parking requirements, building height, private street widths, setbacks, building separations and recreation area requirements as noted in the Master Plan analysis section. One standard is different from the PD Ordinance with regards to a courtyard/driveway to serve a four unit cluster which can be 24 feet in width. This is a primaiy component of the new development standards proposed for PA 5 and is covered in the master plan amendment discussion above in Section A. The design criteria of the PD Ordinance is satisfied because vehicle and pedestrian circulation is accommodated while not proposing a dominant intemal street system. Recreation facilities are located to be accessible to all residents. The overall site design implementing the four unit cluster in addition to the proposed landscape concept is appropriate for the site. The provision for required parking is made and guest parking spaces are adequately dispersed throughout the project to serve all units. Being a part of an approved master plan, there will be no dismptive elements introduced into the MP 177(P)/LCPA 95-ll/cAo9(A)/CP 95-01 AVIARA PA 5, WESTERN PACIFIC NOVEMBER 15,1995 PAGE 6 community by the proposed project. Architectural harmony can be achieved and maintained within the planning area and master plan in general and the proposed development will be compatible with existing and planned surrounding developments in the Aviara Master Plan. E. Growth Management The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 19 in the Southwest Quadrant. The impacts created by this development on public facilities and compliance with the adopted performance standards are summarized as follows: FACILITY IMPACTS COMPLIANCE City Administration 485 square feet Yes libraiy 259 square feet Yes Waste Water Treatment 131 EDU Yes Parks N/A Yes Drainage N/A Yes Circulation 1310 ADT Yes Fire Station Nos. 2 & 4 Yes Open Space N/A Yes Schools CUSD Yes Sewer Collection System 131 EDU Yes Water 28,820 GPD Yes The project is 13 dwelling units below the Growth Management Growth Control Point allowance and 58 units below the maximum allowed by the master plan for PA 5. Required facilities and services will be available to serve the build-out of the Aviara Master Plan including the development of the subject planning area. All required Growth Management findings are contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3835 for CT 90-09(A). V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed revisions to the approved development project within Planning Area 5 were reviewed with respect to their potential environmental impacts, pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQA Guidelines, and Titie 19 - the City's Environmental Protection Ordinance. The project site has undergone two previous environmental reviews: the certified Environmental Impact Report for the Aviara Master Plan and master tentative map for Aviara Phase I, CT 85-35, Unit C (EIR 83-02(A)), and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 147 unit, multi-family development currentiy MP 177(P)/LCPA 95-ll/C^-09(A)/CP 95-01 AVIARA PA 5, WESTERN PACIFIC NOVEMBER 15,1995 PAGE 7 approved for Aviara Planning Area 5 (CT 90-09/PUD 90-12). Upon review of the current proposal, it has been determined that this is a reduced project and that there will be no additional significant effects that were not analyzed in the previous environmental reviews. The current proposal conforms to the parameters established through the previous reviews and all adjustments necessaiy to reduce impacts to a level of insignificance have already been implemented or are incorporated into the project design. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required with this proposal. With regard to air quality and circulation impacts, the City's MEIR found that the cumulative impacts of the implementation of projects consistent with the General Plan are significant and adverse due to regional factors, therefore the City Council adopted a statement of overriding consideration. The project is consistent with the General Plan and as to these effects, no additional environmental document is required. Considering the adequacy of the previous environmental review on the site, the project qualifies as a subsequent development as identified in Section 21083.3 of the CaUfomia Environmental Quality Act. Therefore, the Planning Director issued a Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance on September 27, 1995, a copy of which is attached to this report and on file with the Planning Department. ATTACHMENTS 1. Plaiming Commission Resolution No. 3833 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3834 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3835 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3836 5. Location Map 6. Environmental Impact Assessment Form, Part II dated September 20, 1995 7. Notice of Prior Environmental Compliance dated September 27, 1995 8. Disclosure Form 9. Background Data Sheet 10. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 11. Reduced Exhibits "A" - "Q", dated November 15, 1995 "A" -"C: Tentative Map Exhibits "D": Typical Ouster Site Plan "E" -"J": Plan 1/2/3 - Elevations "K" -"M": Plan 1/2/3 - Floor Plans "N": Pool BIdg. - Elevations/Floor Plans "O": Landscape Concept Plan npn. Water Conservation Plan "Q" Wall and Fence Plan/Details. ENM:BWH:MWG:kr October 17,1995 ARPORT Illll' SITE -h m •11 • llild^ < oc •••••tio*:: BATIQUITOS LAGOON LA AVIARA PLANNING AREA 5 CT 90-09(A)/CP 95-01/ LCPA 95-11/MP 177(P) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART U (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. CT 90-O9(AVCP 95-01/MP 177fP)/LCPA 95-11 DATE: September 20. 1995 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Aviara Planning Area 5 2. APPLICANT: Westem Pacific/Culbertson. Adams & Associates 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 85 Argonaut. Suite 220. Aliso Vieio. California 92656: (714) 581-2888 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: August 14.1995: Complete application: September 19.1995 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Amendment to an existing tentative map for PA 5 in the Aviara Master Plan to replace 147 multi-family units with 131 detached, clustered single family units. To allow single family residential with the product type proposed requires a master plan amendment. Since a coastal zone master plan is involved, a Local Coastal Program Amendment is also required. A new Condominium Permit is also required for this project. The proposed project is essentially a product type change with a slightly reduced density than what is already approved for the subiect site. The master plan currently allows up to 189 dwelling units. The PA 5 site currently sits as a series of three pre-graded pads ready for development: to be served by existing and future infrastructure associated with the Aviara Master Plan. Grading required for this proiect involves approximately 25.900 cubic yards of cut and fill. The existing project (CT 90-09) was approved with a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The only mitigating measure was the provision of a sound wall. This project incorporates a noise wall into the design of the proiect as reflected on the project's approved exhibits. The noise wall design is based on a detailed noise study done for the amended PA 5 development. Otherwise, this project has been adequately designed and/or conditioned so that no significant impacts to the environment will occur: and no impacts beyond those already assessed with the original approval of CT 90-09 will occur. Rev. 3/28/95 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involvmg at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact", or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning Population and Housing Geological Problems Water X Air (Quality X Transportation/Circulation Biological Resources Energy and Mineral Resources Hazards Noise Mandatory Findings of Significance Public Services Utilities and Service Systems Aesthetics Cultural Resources Recreation Rev. 3/28/95 DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency). On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. • I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the envirotmient, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. • I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. • I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the enviromnent, but at least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remam to be addressed. • I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to tiiat earlier MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measiues that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. B Planner Signature Date Planning Director Signature / Date Rev. 3/28/95 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and hiunan factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects Uke the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. Based on an "EIA-Part II", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the envuronment, but aH potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration ptu^uant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, includmg revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measiues required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the enviroiunent. Rev. 3/28/95 • If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EER pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part n analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measiu-es appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. Rev. 3/28/95 Issues (and Siq)parting Infonnaticn Sources): I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source #1 ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (Source #1) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (Source #1) d) Affect agricultural resoiu-ces or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (Source #1) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established commimity (including a low-income or minority community)? (Sotu*ce #1) n. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (Source #1) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (Soiu-ce #1) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (Source #1) ni. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would die proposal resuh in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fauh rupture? (Source #1) b) Seismic ground shaking? (Source #1) c) Seismic ground failure, includmg liquefaction? (Source #1) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X Rev. 3/28/95 Issues (and Siq)poTting Informaticiii Sources): d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (Sotffce #1) e) Landslides or mudflows? (Source #1) f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (Source #1) g) Subsidence of the land? (Source #1) h) Expansive soils? (Source #1) i) Unique geologic or physical features? (Soiu'ce #1) IV. WATER. Would the proposal resuh in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amoimt of siuface runoff? (Source #1) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (Source #1) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quahty (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (Source #1) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (Source #1) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (Source #1) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (Source #1) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (Source #1) h) Impacts to groundwater quaUty? (Source #1) PotentiaUy Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact JL X JL JL JL X JL X Rev. 3/28/95 Issues (and Sqiporting InformatioD Sources): i) Substantial reduction in the amotmt of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (Source #1) V. AIR QUALITY. Would die proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Source #2) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (Source #1) t Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (Source #1) d) Create objectionable odors? (Source #1) JL X VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (Source #2) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (Source #1) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (Source #1) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (Source #1) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (Source #1) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting altemative transportation (e.g. bus tumouts, bicycle racks)? (Source #1) g) Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts? (Source #1) JL X Rev. 3/28/95 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Vn. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result m impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or theh habitats (including but not lunited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? (Source #1) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (Source #1) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (Source #1) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vemal pool)? (Source #1) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (Source #1) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Vni. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (Source #1) X b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (Source #1) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (Source #1) IX. HAZARDS. Would tiie proposal mvolve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation? (Source #1) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Source #1) X Rev. 3/28/95 Issues (and Siqjporting Informatioo Sources): Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? (Source #1) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (Source #1) e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brash, grass, or trees? (Source #1) X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (Source #1) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (Source #1) XL PUBLIC SERVICES. Would Uie proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (Source #1) b) Police protection? (Source #1) c) Schools? (Source #1) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (Source #1) e) Other govemmental services? (Source #1) Xn. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (Source #1) b) Communications systems? (Source #1) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (Source #1) No Impact JL JL JL JL X X 10 Rev. 3/28/95 Issues (and Stqipocting Informatioo Sources): d) Sewer or septic tanks? (Source #1) e) Storm water drainage? (Source #1) f) Solid waste disposal? (Source #1) g) Local or regional water supplies? (Source #1) Xm. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (Source #1) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? (Source #1) c) Create light or glare? (Source #1) XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would tiie proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (Source #1) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (Source #1) c) Affect historical resources? (Source #1) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultiu^l values? (Source #1) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (Source #1) XV. RECREATION. Would tiie proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (Source #1) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (Source #1) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X JL X X JL JL JL JL X X X 11 Rev. 3/28/95 Issues (and Supporting Informatioa Sources): XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) X c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directiy or indirectly? XVn. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. All pertinent earlier analyses have been identified at the beginning of the Discussion of Environmental Evaluation which follows on page 14. The Source Documents identified have been cited as appropriate in the checldist and environmental discussion. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. 12 Rev. 3/28/95 Air Quality and Circulation Impacts: Statements of Overriding Considerations made with the City's General Plan Master EIR (Source Document #2). c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. No mitigation measures are involved with this project. 13 Rev. 3/28/95 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION SOURCE DOCUMENTS CITED (All source documents are on file in tiie Planning Department located at 2075 Las Pahnas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009; (619) 438-1161). 1. Aviara PA 5, CT 90-09, Mitigated Negative Declaration published August 30, 1990 and corresponding Environmental Impact Assessment Form Part n dated August 15, 1990. 2. City of Carlsbad General Plan Final Master EIR 93-01 as approved and certified by City Council Resolution No. 94-246. PROJECT BACKGROUND/OVERVIEW OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project site for PA 5 currently has an approval for 147 multi-family units. This project will amend the existing tentative map, as well as the master plan and local coastal program to allow a detached, clustered single family product type to be developed with 131 units. A balanced grading concept is proposed involving approximately 25,900 cubic yards of cut and fill. No sensitive environmental resources or conditions exist on the site which is a series of three pre-graded pads. No enviroiunental impacts will occur beyond those already assessed in conjunction with the existing approval of CT 90-09 which included the approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The proposed project for PA 5, as designed and/or conditioned, will not have a significant effect on the environment. AIR QUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage altemative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non- attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, mcluded a "Statement Of Overridmg Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent 14 Rev. 3/28/95 projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quaUty impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 fiill and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop altemative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. 15 Rev. 3/28/95 LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) N/A ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM OF APPLICABLE) N/A 16 Rev. 3/28/95 City of Carlsbad Planning Department PUBUC NOTICE OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Please Take Notice: The Planning Department has determined that the environmental effects of the project described below have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, no additional environmental review will be required and a notice of determination will be filed. Project Tide: Aviara PA 5 - Western Pacific Project Location: Planning Area 5 within the Aviara Master Plan Project Description: Amendments to an existing tentative map Master Plan and Local Coastal Program, and a new condominium permit to change an existing approval of 147 multi-family units to 131 detached, clustered units on PA 5. Justificadon for this determination is on file in the Planning Department, Community Development, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in wridng to the Planning Department within ten (30) days of date of publicadon. DATED: CASE NO: SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 GT 90-09(A), GP 95-01, MP 177(P), LCPA 95-11 y MICHAELJ. HOLZMI Planning Z)irector APPUCANT: WESTERN PACIFIC PUBUSH DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 EM:kc 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 • (619)438-1161 cSitV of C^rl5^h;=iH C3 me DISCLOSUR£ ST.ATE.ME.NT i?=UCANrS STATHMENT OP OlSCLCSURE OP Cc.^TTAIN OWNEfSHIP INTHPESTS ON ALI. APPijCATlONS WHICH WILL secuiPE ClSCSETlONAflY ACTION ON THE PAST CF THE C.TV COUNCIL. OB ANY APPQINTzQ SCA^^O. COMMISSION OP COMWrrTEE. 1 (Please Print) Tha fcllowing information must be disclosed: 1. Applicant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Aviara Land Associates Limited PartnershiB 2011 Palomar Airport Road Suite 206 Carlsbad. CA 92009 2. Owner Ust the names and addresses of ail persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Aviara Land Associates Limited PartnershiB 2011 Palomar Airport Road Suite 206 Carlsbad. CA 9?.nn9 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and addresses of ail individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-proftt organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. FRM00013 8/90 2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009-4.859 - (619) 438-1161 isciosure Statement Page 2 Have you had more than S25Q worth of business transacted w.th any member of City staff, ccar.s CommL^ons, Committees and Counoiiwithin the past twelve months? ^^^^ No JL 1^ yes. please indicate persan(s). »,,oci«non ,oo«l dud. fT«Wfn«i ofsmncmtion. corsofttion. «jtat.. tr-st. somoinaiion acting u « untt" Owner: Applicant: Aviara Land Associates Lunited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership By: Aviara Land GoSipany, a Delaware "coiperation, (general Partner L. Clemens/Vice President By: By: Scott M. Medansky/Asst. Secrej( Date: 8/10/95 Aviara Land Associates Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership By: Aviara Land^mpany, a Delaware iratioi/General Partner 'Scott M. Medansky/Asst. Secr^^ Date: 8/10/95 By: Republic Development Co., a Califomia cofpivation, ?gTrei*l Pa/tner Date: ^/Vo/9S By: Republic Development Co., a Califomia corndf^tion, Date 8/10/95 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CT 90-09(AVCP 95-01/LCPA 95-11/MP 177(P) CASE NAME: Aviara Plannmg Area 5 APPLICANT: Westem Pacific Housmg REQUEST AND LOCATION: Proposal to amend the existing tentative map, master plan and local coastal program approvals of a 147 unit multi-familv project to allow a detached, clustered single family product type with a reduced unit total of 131 units. A new condominium pemiit is also reauhed and being processed. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 95. 96. 97 and 98 of Carlsbad Tract 85-35. Aviara Phase 1 Unit C. in the Citv of Carlsbad. Countv of San Diego. State of Califomia. accordmg to Map No. 12411. filed m the Office of the Countv Recorder of San Dieeo Countv on June 29. 1989. APN: 215-592-12/13/14/19 Acres _24^ Proposed No. of Lots/Units 33 lots/131 units (Assessor's Parcel Number) GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation RM Density Allowed 4-8 du's/ac Density Proposed 5.4 du's/ac Existmg Zone P-C Proposed Zone P-C Surroimding Zoning and Land Use: Zoning Land Use Site PC Vacant/Graded Pads North PC Alga Road South PC Single Family/Agriculture East PC PA 4 - Vacant Graded Pads West PC Batiquitos Drive PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Unified Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 131 EDU's Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated August 10. 1995 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Other, A Notice of Prior Compliance was issued on September 27. 1995 with supporting documentation on file in the Plannmg Department. CITY OF CARLSBAD ^ GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: PA 5 - Westem Pacific CT 90-09(A)/CP 95-01/LCPA 95-11/MP 177fP) LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 19 GENERAL PLAN: RM ZONING: P-C DEVELOPER'S NAME: Westem Pacific Housmg ADDRESS: 18001 Cowan Street. Suite H. h-vme. CA 92714 PHONE NO.: (714) 442-6199 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 215-592- 12/13/14/19 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC, SQ. FT., DU): 24 acres/131 du's A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage = 485 B. Library: Demand in Square Footage = 259 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) D. Park: Demand in Acreage = N/A E. Dramage: Demand in CFS = N/A Identify Drainage Basin = C (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Ckculation: Demand in ADTs = 1310 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fhe: Served by Fhe Station No. = 2 & 4 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided - N/A I. Schools: N/A (Demands to be determined by staff) J. Sewer: Demand in EDUs - 131 Identify Sub Basm - N/A K. Water: Demand m GPD - 28.820 L. The project is 13 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. AMENDED TENTAnVE MAP & CONDOMINIUM PLAN AVIARA PLANNING AREA 5 THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CAUFORNIA yicinmr MAP ARCHITECTURE SUMMARY LOCAL STREET •MW1BHOC<CPOVt«T.*M PRIVATE OMVE PVT.aN. X-.f. IT --IT. --V •Shi I u, —mini id. ^^^^ BUILDING COVERAGE SUMMARY COLLECTOR STREET Msastojumeaima PRIVATE STREET PARKING SUMMARY '.DVFUeC SPACFSUNIl PccmwutfTYFi I I ! uaUTr^WT 111 PRIVATE ENTRY STREET PVT. WT. -h-lpm-i •Q'tpor.K -Q- MOtCMI LOT SUMMARY III ill TYPICAL COURTYARD DRAINAGE DETAIL n G s-»V *~ BJ HCsiocMm LEGEND •nCABOUNOADV PROJECT SUMMARY rOTM sm AMA I.OWJM SF 24 . t AC STREET COVERAQE-II 3.440 SF 400 AC MUMtO COVE WOE lee I30SF 37» AC tCTIVE RECRCATKM LOTS II ZZ" tS«Q Sf 1 0 3& AC XUUON OPEN SPACE LOTS 23 M 340.MO SF f 12 AC ' nttWATE PASSIVE OS (IS • IS MM ) ».«WSF OM AC 4EIMMMO PmVATE PASSWE O S M EXCESS 3F IS • ts MM • REMAMmOCCMMWOS nS430SF • SS AC CT 90-09 (A) CP 95-01 GENERAL NOTES lOTAI SITE AREA ?« I ACRES TOTAL NO OMTS Til OEIACHEOCIUSTEREDSMQIE FAMKV TOTAL NO LOTS 33 | 20 RE SUE NT Ml 7 RECREATION II OPEN SPACE) ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER ;IS SU I? 13 14 S IS EKISIINa«>nOf>OSED QENERAL PLAN RM [tlDU'S'ACI ExisTiNa«>noposeD zomna PC. GROSS OENSirv 5 4DU S.AC (131 DUS^4 I ACRES] LFMP 70NE ZONE 19 AVERAQE DAa.V nWFFIC I.HO TOTAi aUKDMO COVERAOE 3« AC GENERAL DESIGN NOTES ALL STREET DESIGNS STREET LIOMTS ANOFME HYDRANTS TO CONFORM TO CITV OF CARLSBAO DESM3H STANDARDS AND AS REOumEO BT THE CITY ENOMEER EASEMENTS AS REQURED BY THE CIT> CNGMEEH PUAC UTIIIICS ANO OIS1RCTS AIL PfK}POSEDUIi.lTtE5IOBE UNOEROROUND CONTOUR INTERVALS Z/IOFEET TOPOQRAPMV PREPARED BV SAN LO AERIAL SURVEYS DATED I IfSaW FMSHEDOAADES ARE APPROKRIATE CM V AND SUBJECT TOCNANOE W FINAL DESION CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY S SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE APPROKNaMIEURAOINaaUANTIIES J CUT TS «00 C T M FK.k nSOOCY • SOUS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM SOUS REPORTS BV ICQ INC V DATED JANUARY ig IBOO ~ A GENERAL UTKIIV ANO ACCESS EASFMENT WH I BE ESIABIISHEO OVER IHE PRIVATE STREETS ANO DRIVES LANDSCAPING AND IREF PIANTMG AS REOUIftEO BY IME CARLSBAO LANDSCAPE MANUAL CUT ANOFN.I SIOfESNOT TO EXCEED I • TYPICAL iOTORAINAaE PERCITY OF CARLSBAD SID MO GS IS4D WOOEL UMTS MAV BE BUH1 PRIOR TO FINAL MAP RECOROAIION THIS PBOJECl IS A Ultl IlPVt TJNII- SUeOIVISIOH H IS TME »*1ENT TMAT MinriPLE FINAL MAPS BE FN Et) F^RSUANT TO SECIION M4Se I OF THE SUBDIVtSION MAP AC r IHE FINAL MAP MAV CONSIST OF ONE OR MORE MULTIPLE LOIS AS SHOWN ON THIS lENTATIVE MAP AN AODITIONAt 3 S urn^lIV EASEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED AOJACENI TO PRIVATE SIREETSFOR JOINI TRENCH UTH ITIES THIS IS A MAP OF A CONDOMINIUM PROJEC I AS DFTINEO IN SECTION 1350 OF THE CIVIL coot OF IHE STATE OF CAIIFORNIA AND IS flEO PI N MAP ACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION lO'S 9S 9« 9' AND M t> CARISBAD IRACI SS K A CI'V OF CARlSBAd COUNIY OF SAN WFCJ) SIAIEC IlfE MAP THEREOF NO >/4M FUEO IN THE OFTICF n SAN DIEGO COUNTV JUNE?BIWS lARA PHASE I tWII C IN IHE CALIFORNIA ACCOFttMNQ TO IHE COUNTY RECORDER OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AND DISTRICTS c^s ANOEiftTRn: WAIEH SEWER STORM DRAIN SANOieC.O(iAS ANOELtC IBIC PACIFIC BEll TELEPHONE CARLSBAO MUNICIPAI WATER DIST CAHISBAOMUNICIPAI WATER DISI CUV OF CAHtSBAO LIU DF CAR! SBAD niVOF CABl SBAD CAHlSBADIINiriFDSCHOOl DISI AVIARA LAND ASSOCIATES iP A [DELAWARE LriMIIED PARTNERSHIP 2011 PALOMAR AIRPORT HOAO SUITE ?06 CARLSBAO CA 9?00» |eiB|S3l 1190 WE S rE RN PACIf IC HOUSING laOOl COWAN STREET Si;iIE H IRVINE CA »7t4 I714J442 6199 PREPARED BV: jnsaturr- REVISIONS I DATE I BY AMENDED TENTAUVE HAP AND CONDOMMHIH PLAN AVIARA PLANNING AREA 5 SHEET 1 OF 3 OCT 2 3 m EXHIB T "A' NOVEMBER 15, 1995 CT 90-09 (A) CP 95-01 SCALE IN FEET OCT 7. 3 TO AMENDED TENTATIVE MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PLAN AVIARA PLANNING AREA 5 TM»CnYOI'C«HH««D,C«lJHlHA SHEET 2 OF 3 EXHIBIT "B' EASEMENT NOTES o 0 o o 0 0 0 0 A ISO 00 EASEMENT FOR EfTHEM OR BOTH POLE CMCS UHDEMWOUND CONDUITS ANO MC»EMTAl PURPOSES TOOETHER WTIM T>« RUKT OF INGRESS AMD EQRCSS M FAVOR C SAM D«OOOAS WO ELECTRK: COMPANY BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER IM M BOOK CIOI PAGE IKOF OFFiruu RECOROS (TITIE REPORT ITEM Ml AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC STREET PURP08CS FOI ORAMAOE PURPOSES FOR SOEWAIK PURPOSES ANO MCOENTAl PUnPOSES H FAtfOR OF TW Cirv OF CARISBAD. RECOROEDMMB AS FtE NO •BJWnHOE omCM RECORDS ITIIIE REPORT ITEM 114) AN EASEMENT FOR DRAMAOE AND MCOENTAL PUflPOSES AS DELMEAIEO ANO OESIONAIED ON MAP MO I24M SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS ANO c:aNOITIONS CONIAMCD THEREIN (TnLE REPORT ITEM • IB) AN EASEMENT FOR OPEN SPACE AND MCOENTAL PURPOSES AS OELME ATEO ANDDFSXINATEDONMAPNO 12411 SUBJECT TO ANY TERMS AND CONDIIIONS CONTAINED IHEREM (TITLE AN EASEMENT FOR GENERAL UIILIIY ANO ACCESS ANO MCIDENIAL PURPOSES AS DELINEATED ANO DE8IONATEDONMAP IMM AFFECTMOA PORTION OF LOT BI SUBJECT IO ANY TERMS ANO CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN (riTlE REPORT AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SDGAE FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAMTENANCE Of UNDEROROUNO AND ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES WITHIN A STRIP Of LAND 1000 FEET IN WIDTH ADJACENT lOALOAROAD RECORDED 2I30W AS FH.E NO 90 0MI3ri OF OFFCIAI RECORDS (TITLE REPOni ITEM • 211 A NON PLOT!ABLE EASEMENT AND COVENANT BE TWfEEN AVIARA LAND ASSOCIATES AND DANIELS CABLEVISION INC REGAROMd CABLE TV SERVICE RECORDED Afim AS FILE NO 'S OF OFFICIAI RECORDS (IIIIF REPORT HEM • Tfl) AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SOGAE FOR CONSTRUCTION AMD MAMTENANCE OF UNDEROHOliNO AND ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES WIIHW A STRIP OF lAND ttOO FEET t* WIDTH (AFFECTMO A PORTION OF LOT S7 0FMAP IMII) RECORDED a«V1 AS FILE NO 01 03B3MI OF OFFICIAL RECORDS I'lUE REPORT IIFMB 301 THt LDCATIOH SHOWN HKMON • APMOXMIATt ONLY CITY QF CARISBAO rC[ 9'^j,^<3»y^ CT 90-09 <A) CP 95-01 SCALE IN FEET RECEIVED OCT 2 3 1995 t.-'COASTW. ' OEEO , RCSTMCTED ( AREA LOT 321 AMENDED TENTAUVE MAP AND CONDOMmniM PUM AVIARA PLANNING AREA 5 IMC orr OF cARLnm CAUPOMu EXHIBIT "C 91 L.oof> sTxeej CLUSTER SITE PLAN AVIARA - P.A. 5 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING Ft f- ,., ^ > U... V.., ARCHIIECTS a . z 5 an li! EXHIBIT "D' Ui CD X X UJ FRONT ELEV. lA FRONT ELEV. IB Plan 1 AVIARA - P.A. 5 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING OQ X X Ui RIGHT REAR Plan 1 AVIARA - P.A. 5 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING FRONT ELEV. 2A o t CD X X Ui FRONT ELEV. 2B FRONT ELEV. 2C Plan 2 AVIARA - P.A. 5 '^:':ZD WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING X X Ui •A' Plan 2 AVIARA - P.A. 5 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING m FRONT ELEV. 3D (EXPOSED TO STREET r --^ .--^ 2 3 Plan 3 AVIARA - P.A. 5 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING CO X X Ul '~>;.:?-.iirv<V:; eg X X Ui RIGHT Plan 3 AVIARA - P.A. 5 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING m ffi X X UJ f- Kf EN K—a 55^- FAMILY m PLAN 1 1870 SF AVIARA- P.A. 5 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING m ARCHITECTS P • L 0 . "1 Z < z < ffl X X Ui PLAN 2 1930 SF AVIARA - P.A. 5 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING m ARCHITECTS TM-1400 B-2-9S CCI 2 3 r:^ z 5 a: 8 z < ffi X X UJ PLAN 3 2293 SF AVIARA - P.A. 5 WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING ARCHITEaS 1J0-1400 e-2-95 C"" 2 3 1^ •I' z < z Q. MJtlAKE F(K)rA(,l: -idll S.F. imill)IN(,) 2Ji) SI. IIOWFK «, TRFIIIS ARIAl floor (ilan front AVIARA - P.A. 5 POOL BUILDING WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING EXHIBIT "N' AVIARA VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN WESTERN PACIFIC HOMES IORM\ FXHIRIT "O" r:T 2 3 r^'i AVIARA WATER CONSERVATION PLAN WESTERN PACIFIC HOMES , roRivt\ EXHIBIT "P" Fl EVAI IONS lliilllll n:.:z':.:'/:D 0"T 2 3 r^T AVIARA WALL AND FENCE PLAN WESTERN PACIFIC HOMES FXHIBIT "Q"