Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MS 13-08; Tierra La Costa; Minor Subdivision (MS) (2)
C ITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION P-1 Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) Develooment Permits I I Administrative Permit I I Coastal Development Permit (*) [H Minor n Conditional Use Permit (*) I I Minor O Extension I I Environmental Impact Assessment Habitat Management Permit [U Minor 0 Hillside Development Permit (*) 1 I Planned Development Permit I I Residential Q Non-Residential I I Planned Industrial Permit I I Planning Commission Determination I I Site Development Plan I I Special Use Permit J7l Tentative Tract Maii/Parcel Maj: I I Variance Q Administrative (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) Legislative Permits I I General Plan Amendment I I Local Coastal Program Amendment (*) (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) /^~o/ I I Master Plan n Amendment I I Specific Plan O Amendment I I Zone Change (*) I I Zone Code Amendment South Carlsbad Coastal Review Area Permits I I Review Permit I I Administrative CH Minor Q Major Villaae Review Area Permits I I Review Permit I I Administrative CH Minor CH Major (*) = eligible for 25% discount NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: ZZ"^" C'p'O ~^ lM~(3<g> PROJECT NAME: <.r^A (Zo^U BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: L^V U,^C, ^/'^rU[y^^ ^c.A ll-ZO ^ I %^ U.. ^'^Cc^ LOCATION OF PROJECT: {/cryo^^p j £^fcr^ ( kW\\v /^..c^ ^.r^.r) STREET ADDRESS SIDE OF Ui!lA^A(3 ON THE: BETWEEN (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) (NAME OF STREET) AND (NAME OF STREET) C.a?i (NAME OF STREET) p-1 Page 1 of 6 Revised 11/12 09/30/2013 11:16 FTP IOMEGA FTP 1002/006 APPLICANT NAME (Print): (4^^^ G^^Avfry MAIUNG ADDRESS: ^^^^ J^^^r^ ^ri^ /l^rhfH^ OWNER NAME (Prim): Uo>V^ W •rr»^> MAILING ADDRESS: y^^^ C^:ni^^,r, U^r CITY. STATE. ZIP: .UW^ Ct< p^r^l TELEPHONE: EMAIL ADDRESS: CITY, STATE. ZIP: TELEPHONE: ^ ^f^- ^f/f EMAIL ADDRESS: ce&i INOWLEDGE 1 CEFrriFY THAT I AM THE UeOAL OWNER ANO THAT AU. THE A60V5 INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY SIQNA^ if A—KU. •vv.^a4r^ '.—r-H I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTAnVE OF THE OWNER AND TKAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION 1$ TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, DAT€ SIQNATURE DATE APPL•CA^^-S REPRESENTATIVE (Print): f^^..^/^^^^^/ ^ MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE. ZIP: TELEPHONE; EMAIL ADDRESS: T I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECUO TIJCnuSTOF MY KNOWLED6E. SIGNATURE OATE IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPUCATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. IflWE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. NOTICE OF RESTRICTION: PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRICTION BEING RECORDED ON THE TTTLE TO HIS PROPERTY IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. NOTICE OF RESTRICTIONS RUN WrTH THE UND AND BIND ANY SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST OWNER SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY RECEIVED OCT 21 m CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING mmrM DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY:, p-1 Page 2 of 6 Revise 11/12 ^ DISCLOSURE Development Services <J<r STATEMENT "~ Planning Division ^ CITY OF p 4/A\ 1635 Faraday Avenue PARI <;RAn (760)602^10 ^f\l\l-.JUr\l^ wvw.carlsbadca.gov Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social dub, fivtemal organization, corporation, estate, tmst, receiver, syndicate, in this and any otiier county, dty and county, dty munidpality, district or other political sutxiivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit.' ^ Agents may sign this document; however, tiie legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not ttie applicant's agent) Provide ttie COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in tiie application. If the applicant includes a corporation or paftnershio. include tfie names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a oublidv-owned corporation, include the names, tities, and addresses of ttie corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person <^rf^ ^^.,^^7^^) <af-» Corp/Paft ^/PcOCI'^'Tf-f/' Titie {p<ftHir>g Wf\<\yr I? Tltie_ Address ?^ (^y Address OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide tiie COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide ttie nature of the legal ownership (i.e., partnersNp, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership indudes a corporation or partnership, include ttie names, tities, addresses of all individuals owning more ttian 10% of ttie shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES. PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a put)liclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person Vf. Lur\A Fun^Tfu^V Corp/Part Title Oajfsi.r ^ Titie Address ^C>C-0 ^rccr^r^f Urv/- Address. P-1(A) Page lof 2 RtviMd 07/10 NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) at>ove is a nonprofit Ofqanization or a trust, list ttie names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of ttie non- profit organization or as tiustee or t)enefidary of ttie. Non Profit/Trust /o/^A Fb«v^ Titte Chir^U Address l(/:/b ^r.^^A^.i U>vc Address. Non Profltn"mst^ Titie Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any memt>er of City staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? • Yes 0 No If yes, please indicate person(s): NOTE: Attach additional stieete if necessary. I certify that ail the above infonnation is true and correct to the best of my Icnowiedge. Signature of owner/date Print or type name of owner 'Mature of appHcant/date ^^^^ ^'^^^•Z^^:^ Oc<^ \^IZe>\S Print-oF^pe name of applicant Signature of owner/applicanfs agent if applicable/date Printar type name of OM 2(x^ ?<g'/z«3(3 f owner/applicanfs agent P-1(A) Page2of2 Rmis«l 07/10 ^ CITY OF CARI SRAD PROJECT DESCRIPTION P-1(B) Development Services Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT NAME: /T'^ O f'U^)^rr}^/>^ <^^^^ ^ C^^f^y/d^^ Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: P-1(B) Page 1 of 1 Revised 07/10 09/30/2013 11:16 FTP IOMEGA FTP 1001/002 ^ c 1 r r Of CARLSBAD HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT P-1(C) Develooment Services Planning Uvision 1635 Faraday Avenue (760)602-4610 www.carlsbadca .gov Consultation of Lists of Sites Relsted to Hazardous Wastes (CartificaHon of Compliance with Govemment Code Section 65962.5) Pursuant to State of Califomia Govemment Code Section 65962.5, I have consulted the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites Ust compiled by the Califbmia Environmental Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one): The development project and any altematives pioposed In ttiis applicatiori are not contained on ttie lists compiled pursuant to Sectbn 65962.5 of ttie State Govemment Code. Q The development project and any altematives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Govemment Code. APPUCANT Address: 3 '-^ j,^ Cs,^ / ^ i f \t^\ C Phone mtti^r._^£±JM:Am. PROPERTYOWNER Name: Y-C jb^Li'\'=K fo'>^"Truit Address: /^tCiLA f/t<r /a^/- Phone Numt)er: Address of Ste: fyfi ^l ^ XX^ - ISO " Local Agency (City and County): Assessor's book, page, and parcel numt>er:_ Specify llst(s}: Regulatory Identiflcation Number.. Date of List Applicant Signature/Date Pr9perty Owner Signature/Oete The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites Ust (Cortese List) is used by the State, local agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements in pnsviding infonnation atiout the location of hazardous materials release sites. P-1(C) R«ylsodDZ/i3 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To be Compleled by AppHcant) Date Filed: ^/"S (To be completed by City) Application NuiT^r(s): General Information 1. Name of project: 2. Name of developer or project sponsor ^ S OP i <^/va. Address: City, State, Zip Code: Oicyi /A f2L\(o^ Phone Number <?^/- ^^f- 3. Name of person to be contacted conceming this project: ^/^f^ /^ar/J^eT/n Address: ^H(^Cf {ammo y\^/^A\f City, Slate, 25p Code: C^rlib<it) f^gfcPT Phone Number ^^1^ 4. Address of Project: £fkr^ \ UcA^c» /0<£. C!^rr\<,r Assessor's Parcel Number ^.'X'^" Z.^O~ iM List and descritM any other related pennits and ottier pMJbHc approvals raquired for tttn project, induding those required by dty, regional, stirte and federal agencies: 6. Exis^ General Plan Land Use Deeignation: PC ^^CAI^CQI/A/ Lau}-l\t^ r)- 7. Existing 2»ning district: 8. Existing land U8e(8): ^..t'.i^tAs^X U4- 9. Proposed use of site (Projed for which this ftxm is filed): ^4t<jdyl4iA/ \a\ Project Deeeriptlon 10. Site size: ^^^tM 11. Proposed Building square footage: h^ta^ 'iooo Ff ^ (^^podl 12: Number of floors of construction: 13. Amount of off-street paridng provided: % (^r'K'Y 14. Assodated projects: P-1(D) Page 2 of 4 RevfMd 07/10 15. If residential, indude the numt>er of units and schedule of unit sizes: 16. If commerdal, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, dty or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading fadlities: 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading fadlities: 18. If institutional, indicate ttie major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading fedlities, and community twnefits to t)e derived firom the project 19. If the projed involves a variance, oondKional use or rezoning applications, state this and indicate cleariy why the application is required: P-1(D) Page 3 of 4 Revised 07/10 Are the fbHomring items applicable to ttie pnsject or its effects? Disojss all items cfwcked yes (attactt additional stteets as necessary). Yes No 20. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, or hills, or substantial • alteration of ground contours. 21. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or • ^ roads. 22. Change in pattem, scale or charader of general area of project • ^ 23. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. • 0 24. Change in di»t, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vidnity. • ^ 25. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or • 0 alteration of existing drainage pattems. 26. Sut}stantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in ttie vkanity. • 0 27. Site on filled iand or on sk>pe of 10 percent or more. i 0i • 28. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxk: sut>stances, • jZ[ flammables or explosives. 29. Sut>stantial change in demand for munk»pal sennces (poltee, fire, water, sewage, • 0 etc.). 30. Sut>stantially increase fossil fuel consun4>tk>n (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). • ^ 31. Relationship to a larger projed or series of projects. • 0 Environmental Setting Attach stteets that inckide a response to the foKoiving questions: 32. Describe ttie projed site as it existe before ttie project induding Miormation on topography, soil statrility, plante and animals, and any cultural, histoiical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and ttie use oX the structures, /attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will tie accepted. 33. Descrit)e the surrounding properties, including information on planto and animals and any cutturai, historical or scenk: aspecto. IncHcate the type of land uae (residential, commerdal, ete.), intensity of land use (on»femily, i^jaitinent houses, shops, department stores, ete.), and scale of devetopment (height frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc). AHach photographs of the vk;inity. Snapshots or poteroki photos wiN be accepted. Certification I heret>y certify that tiie statemente fumished atx>ve and in the attadied exhitiite present the date and informatkMi required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that tiie fads, stetemento, snd infonmation presented are true and corred to tiie best of my knowledge and tielii Date: lt/li/l^\1> For ({P^£^^^/^J^^r'^/ P-1(D) Page 4 of 4 Reviaed 07/10 CITY OF CARLSBAD TIME LIMITS ON DISCRETIONARY PROJECTS P-1(E) Development Services Planning Division 1635 FaradayAvenue (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.gov PLEASE NOTE: Time limits on the processing of discretionary projects established by state law do not start until a project application is deemed complete by the City. The City has 30 calendar days from the date of application submittal to determine whether an application is complete or incomplete. Within 30 days of submittal of this application you will receive a letter stating whether this application is complete or incomplete. If it is incomplete, the letter will state what is needed to make this application complete. When the application is complete, the processing period will start upon the date of the completion letter. If you have any questions regarding application submittal requirements (i.e., clarification regarding a specific requirement or whether all requirements are necessary for your particular application) please call (7 Applicant Signatu Staff Signature: Date: ^r/vj/ 7<^f'?' To be stapled with receipt to the application P-1(E) Page 1 of 1 Revised 07/10 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP n.u.lnnm.nf C.r^.V.c ^r^m^-. Development Services WAIVER OF PROCESSING Planning Division AD D A Pk """'"^ LIMITS «35 Faradav A.anue L.AKL:>BAU P-I(F) www.carlsbadca.gov Proposed Minor Subdivision No.:^ ^ ^ 0^ Subdivision Map Act (SMA) Section 66452.1 sets a 50-day time limit for the Planning Division to process tentative parcel maps. Per SMA Section 66451.1, this time limit may be extended by mutual consent of the applicant and the city to allow for concurrent processing of related approvals or an environmental review of the project. By accepting applications for tentative parcel maps concurrently with applications for other approvals that are prerequisites to the map (e.g., Environmental Information Form, Environmental Impact Report, Condominium Permit, Planned Unit Development), the 50-day time limit is often exceeded. For the city to process a tentative parcel map application concurrently, the property owner or applicant must sign this agreement. If this agreement is not signed, the city will accept the tentative parcel map application only after all prerequisites to the map have been processed and approved. The undersigned acknowledges the processing time required by the city is expected to exceed the 50-day time restriction and hereby waives such time restriction for city planner action. ^ y J . Signer is (check one): ^ ^.'^^ /p^^.yj^r. /W DProperty Owner i^lApplicant Signature ,Bf^t Name Date Signature Print Name Date Signer is (check one): •Property Owner [IlApplicant P-1(F) Rev. 04/13 LEUCADIA WAJTEWATER DhTRKT LEADERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BOARD OF DIRECTORS ELAINE SULLIVAN, PRESIDENT DAVID KULCHIN, VICE PRESIDENT JUDY K. HANSON, DIRECTOR ALLAN JULIUSSEN, DIRECTOR DONALD F. OMSTED, DIRECTOR PAUL J. BUSHEE, CENERAL MANACER Ref: 14-3857 September 25, 2013 Chris Garcia City of Carlsbad Planning Department 1635 FaradayAvenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Apn # 2232501400 Venado Street Project Dear Mr. Garcia, The project Is in the Leucadia Wastewater District and there is sewer Capacity for this project. In order to receive proper approval by Leucadia Wastewater District (LWD), the Owner shall submit ail applicable plan check documentation stated herein, but not limited to the following: grading plans, sewer improvement plans, tract or parcel maps, and preliminary title reports, grease interceptor documentation, easement documentation, etc. Simultaneous with the submittal, the Owner shall complete a Development application form, deposit a plan checking fee, and establish a project location code for plan check. Further assistance can be provided by Frank Reynaga at (760) 753-0155. For additional information on the plan check application requirements, please refer to the LWD Standard Specifications, latest edition available for purchase at LWD or online at www.lwwd.orq. Sincerely, Frank Reynaga Field Services Specialist 1960 LACOSTA AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA 92009 • PHONE 760.753.0155 • FAX 760.753.3094 -LWWD.ORG - INFO LWWD.ORC ^ CITY OF CARLSBAD STORM WATER STANDARDS QUESTIONNAIRE E-34 Development Services Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov To address post-development pollutants that may be generated from development projects, the City requires that new development and significant redevelopment priority projects incorporate Pennanent Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMP's) into the project design per the City's Standard Urban Stonnwater Management Plan (SUSMP). To view the SUSMP, refer to the Engineering Standards (Volume 4, Chapter 2) at www.carlsbadca.Qov/standards. Initially this questionnaire must be completed by the applicant in advance of submitting for a development application (subdivision, discretionary permits and/or construction permits). The results of the questionnaire determine the level of stomi water standards that must be applied to a proposed development or redevelopment project. Depending on the outcome, your project will either be subject to 'Standard Stormwater Requirements' or be subject to additional criteria called 'Priority Development Project Requirements'. Many aspects of project site design are dependent upon the stonn water standards applied to a project. Your responses to the questionnaire represent an initial assessment of the proposed project conditions and impacts. City staff has responsibility for making the final assessment after submission of the development application. If staff detennines that the questionnaire was incorrectly filled out and is subject to more stringent stonn water standards than initially assessed by you, this will result in the return of the development application as incomplete. In this case, please make the changes to the questionnaire and resubmit to the City. If you are unsure about the meaning of a question or need help in detemining how to respond to one or more of the questions, please seek assistance from Land Development Engineering staff. A separate completed and signed questionnaire must be submitted for each new development application submission. Only one completed and signed questionnaire is required when multiple development applications for the same project are submitted concurrently. In addition to this questionnaire, you must also complete, sign and submit a Project Threat Assessment Form with construction pennits for the project. Please start by completing Step 1 and follow the instructions. When completed, sign the form at the end and submit this with your application to the city. >.^4> .c 'i^i^irr' l TO BE COMPLETEO FOR ALL PROJECTS-• - f. -'-, To determine if your project is a prionty development project, please answer the following questions; YES NO 1. Is your project LIMITED TO constructing new or retrofitting paved sidewalks, bicycle lanes or trails that meet the following criteria: (1) Designed and constructed to direct stomi water runoff to adjacent vegetated areas, or other non-erodible permeable areas; OR (2) designed and constructed to be hydraulically disconnected from paved streets or roads; OR (3) designed and constructed with permeable pavements or surfaces in accordance with USEPA Green Streets guidance? K 2. Is your project LIMITED TO retrofitting or redeveloping existing paved alleys, streets, or roads that are designed and constructed in accordance with the USEPA Green Streets guidance? A- If you answered "yes" to one or more of the above questions, then your project is NOT a priority development project and therefore is NOT subject to the storm water criteria required for priority development projects. Go to step 4, mark the last box stating "my project does not meet PDP requirements" and complete applicant Information. If you answered "no" to both questions, then go to Step 2. E-34 Page 1 of 3 Effective 6/27/13 ^ CITY OF CARLSBAD STORM WATER STANDARDS QUESTIONNAIRE E-34 Development Services Land Development Engineering 1635 FaradayAvenue 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov TO BE COMPLETED FOR ALU NEW OR REDEVELOPMENT PROJEQT^ . -. '. f i "-/ To determine if your project is a priority development project, please answer the following questions: Ygg 1. Is your project a new development that creates 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surfaces collectively over the entire project site? This includes commercial, industrial, residential, mixed-use, and public development projects on public or private land. X 2. Is your project creating or replacing 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site on an existing site of 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface? 7?7;s includes commercial, industrial, residential, mixed-use, and public development projects on public or private land. X 3. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a restaurant? A restaurant is a facility that sells prepared foods and drinks for consumption, including stationary lunch counters and refreshment stands selling prepared foods and drinl<s for immediate consumption. K 4. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface coiiectively over the entire project site and supports a hillside development project? A hillside development project includes development on any natural slope that is twenty-five percent or greater. >r 5. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a pari<ing lot. A parking lot is a land area or facility for the temporary pari<ing or storage of motor vehicles used personally for business or for commerce. 6. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a street, road, highway freeway or driveway? A street, road, highway, freeway or driveway is any paved impen/ious surface used for the transportation of automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, and other vehicles. 7. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates or replaces 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface collectively over the entire site, and discharges directly to an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA)? "Discharging Directly to" includes flow that is conveyed overiand a distance of 200 feet or less from the project to the ESA, or conveyed in a pipe or open channel any distance as an isolated flow from the project to the ESA (i.e. not commingles with flows from adjacent lands).* X 8. Is your project a new development that supports an automotive repair shop? An automotive repair shop is a facility that is categorized in any one of the following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes: 5013, 5014. 5541, 7532-7534, or 7536-7539. X 9. Is your project a new development that supports a retail gasoline outlet (RGO)? This category includes RGO's that meet the following criteria: (a) 5,000 sguare feet or more or (b) a project Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 100 or more vehicles per day. X 10. Is your project a new or redeveiopment project that results in the disturbance of one or more acres of land and are expected to generate pollutants post construction? X 11,1s your project located within 200 feet of the Pacific Ocean and (1) creates 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface or (2) increases impervious surface on the property by more than 10%? K If you answered "yes" to one or more of the above questions, you ARE a priority development project and are therefore subject to implementing structural Best Management Practices (BMP's) in addition to implementing Standard Stomi Water Requirements such as source control and low impact development BMP's. A Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) must be submitted with your application(s) for development. Go to step 3 for redevelopment projects. For new projects, go to step 4 at the end of this questionnaire, check the "my project meets PDP requirements" box and complete applicant Information. If you answered "no" to all of the above questions, you ARE NOT a priority development project and are therefore subject to implementing only Standard Stonn Water Requirements such as source control and low impact development BMP's required for all development projects. A Stomi Water Management Plan (SWMP) is not required with your application(s) for development. Go to step 4 at the end of this questionnaire, check the "my project does not meet PDP requirements" box and complete applicant information. E-34 Page 2 of 3 Effective 6/27/13 CITY OF CARLSBAD STORM WATER STANDARDS QUESTIONNAIRE E-34 Development Services Land Development Engineering 1635 FaradayAvenue 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov PRIORITY DEVELOPEMEh Complete the questions below regarding your redevelopment project: YES NO Does the redevelopment project result in the creation or replacement of impervious surface in an amount of less than 50% of the surface area of the previously existing development? If you answered "yes," the stmctural BMP's required for Priority Development Projects apply only to the creation or replacement of impen/ious surface and not the entire development Go to step 4, check the "my project meets PDP requirements" box and complete applicant information. If you answered "no," the structural BMP's required for Priority Development Projects apply to the entire development. Go to step 4, check ttie "my project meets PDP requirements" box and complete applicant information. . . .CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX ANB;i;.PMPt.ETg< My project meets PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (PDP) requirements and must comply with additional stonnwater criteria per the SUSMP and I understand I must prepare a Storm Water Management Plan for submittal at time of application. I understand flow control (hydromodification) requirements may apply to my project. Refer to SUSMP for details. My project does not meet PDP requirements and must only comply with STANDARD STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS per the SUSMP. As part of these requirements, I will incorporate low impact development strategies throughout my project. Applicant Information and Signature Box Address: Accessor's Parcel Number(s): Applicant Name:^ Applicant Title: Date: This Box for City Use Only City Concurrence: YES NO By: Date: Project ID: * Environmentally Sensitive Areas include but are not limited to all Clean Water Act Section 303(d) impaired water bodies; areas designated as Areas of Special Biological Significance by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments); water bodies designated with the RARE beneficial use by the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments); areas designated as preserves or their quivalent under the Multi Species Conservation Program within the Cities and County of San Diego; and any other equivalent environmentally sensitive areas which have been identified by the Copermittees. E-34 Page 3 of 3 Effecfive 6/27/13 07/09/2013 07:33 FTP IOMEGA FTP 1 001/007 !WMI. TBSTEES PO. Box 119; June 25.2013 Uke^id., Caiifo^u (619) 443-0060 Greg Goertzen 3466 Camino Michelle Carlsbad, Califomia 92009 SUBJECT: FileNo. 1J47JM3 SITE INSPECTION Proposed Lot Split and Residential Building Site North^ Comer of Venado Sti^t and Esfem Street •^iiyoi Carlsbad Dear Mr. Goertzen; SCOPE t«<=omnicndations for 1? ^msS T.i f ? '''' '"f ^^^^^^ engineering understanding that TlofLf^r^l'J^^ ^^'^^^^^ ^<^^- It: is ou? proposed for each lot ^ " """^ ^'^"^^^ ^ingle-fannly reside3ice flELD INSPECTION site, reviewed the near chaiacteristie-s. ^ ^^''^ ^^'^^^^^ strength and expansive SITE CONDITIONS 07/09/2013 0r.'3'3 MP Greg Goertzen FileNo.n47Jl-13 June 25,2013 inspection. In addition, native soils were loose and compressible to approximately 2 lo 3 feet in depth. Stockpiles containing boulders and large rock along with soils are located on titie northwesterly side ofthe site. SOIL CONDITIONS The soils encountered in Exploration Trench No. 1 on tbe southeast side ofthe site of the site were fill materials consisting of loose to fnro, grey to tan layers of silly sands with clay binder ajid gravel and rock to approximately 2.5 feet in depth in dqjth where native firm to medium dense, tan, silty. clayey sands were encountered. These clayey soils continued to the bottom of Ihe exploration approximately 4 feet in depth. In Exploration Trench No. 2, on the northeast side of Hit site, we encountered native, firm, grey, silly, clayey sands to approximately 2 feet in depth vfhsst firm to medium dense, grey siltstone was encountered to the bottom of the excavatiott, approximately three feet in depth. The clayey soils we encountered are considered to be highly expansive with respect to change in volume with change in moisture content and will require special foundation design to resist expansive soils. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Unless documentation to certify compaction ofthe existing fill soils, they are not suitable for supporting the proposed structures. In order to provide unifotnt support for the proposed .structure, the surfece soils in proposed buildmg areas should be excavated to firm natural ground, approximately two feet in depth at the rear of the site and four feet in depth at the fbont of the site. They should be replaced and recompacted to at least 90 percent compaction in accordance with the following Grading Specifications. The recompaction should extend at least 5 feet outside the proposed building footprints. Any organics or other deleterious material that may be encountered should be removed prior to recompaction. 2. A representati ve sample of the foundation soil was remolded to 90% of maximum dry density. Based on the following test results, a safe allowable bearing value of at least 2000 pounds per square foot may be used in designing the foundations and slab for the proposed structure. This value may be increased by one third for wind and/or seismic loadmg. Angle of intemal friction Cohesion Unit weight 2r 428 psf 106.2 pcf 07/09/2013 07:33 FTP IOMEGA FTP 1 003/007 Greg Goertzen Fiie No.l 147J1-13 June 25, 2013 Maxiraum Dry Density Optimum Moisture Content Expansion Index 117.9 pcf 13.4% 97 4. 5. adheredtoSoXto DiS^^^^^^^^ ^ ^""^^^ shouid be strictly effects ofexpa^Sve sX P^^P^^^'* -^^^^ures from adverse bra and underlam with a sand suE.T- ? • ^ ™" raiforcing meet this criteria. "^^^'^^ "^^^"^ «^«sh for 4" slabs wiU Thickened edges shjiu 8 i„cS Itt^f T '''^ * ^ rar .^f " ' -- IOMEGA FTP 1)004/007 07/09/2013 07:33 FTP Greg Goertzen PileNo.1147JM3 June 2,5,2013 edges and should be provided with thickened edges if this option is chosen. If wheel loads exceeding 1500 pounds or abnomial tire pressures are anticipated, we should be contacted to provide a heavier slab section. Spacing of weakened plane joints and expansion joints should not exceed 20 feet and 60 feet, respectively for interior slabs and 20 feet and 40 feet, respectively for exterior slabs. EXPANSIVE SOILS In addition to the special foundations recommended hereinbefore, the following details should be incorporated to reduce the probability of damage &om the expansive soils. The exijansive soil conditiOTs dictate the foundation and footing design. For any foundatior} or support jyst^,_tbe gtpansiyis f oils piust be nrs-satmated. Presaturation of expansive soils prior to placing conaetc is imperative if the probability and/or amount of damage j&om the expansive soils is to be reduced. The subgrade soils are saturated and expanded before the concrete is placed. Therefore, the clayey subgrade soils, especially below concrete flatwork should not be allowed to dty and should be sprinkled if necessaiy to insure they arc kept in a very moist condition. Soils underlying slabs should have a moL-rture content exceeding 4 percent above optimvnn moisture. Tbey should be tested for proper moisture from a depth of 2 feet not more than 24 hours before placing concrete. Allowance for soil expansion should be made vtdien setting subgrade elevations prior to presaturaling the soils. 6. It is our opinion, based )jpon our te.st results, that fill slopes and natutal cut slopes will be stable at maximum inclinations of 2 horizontal to 1 vertical. Proposed structures and other improvements should be located at least 7 fiom the top of compacted fill slopes. If proposed foundations and footings ate located closer than 7 feet inside ths top of compacted fill slopes, they must be deepened so that the face of footing at the elevation of the bottom is at least 7 feet back ftom the face of slope at that level 7. Total and differential settlement is expected to be within industry adopted standards as long as the reconm:iendations presented in this report are adhered to. RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Proposed Residential Building Site Northca.st Comer of Venado and Esfera Streets City of Carlsbad GENERAL: Soil Testers and 'Engineer' are synonymous hereinafter and shall be employed 07/09/2013 07:33 FTP IOMEGA FTP 1 005/007 Greg Goertzen rj-i vr FileNo.l 47JI-13 ^ June 25, 2013 s. to the inspectfon., and KSryr^S'^Tl'^ ""-"I -"equate ami any unf„««n soU eondS *^ 'Wnsed of SlfomriSS^J adv^ weather, or Ae engineer will be cause for CS^ Z^X'^"^''''^^'^' ^t^ipn^ions of his services. ^ '^'^^^^^P^'^^^^tative to immcdiatd^ Devi^ons from the iBcommendations of the Soil Ren.^ fr. u , Specifications must be approved in writing h^ tit ll^ P^^^' ^^n^ Ihcse the engineer. ""^ contractor and endorsed by SOIL TEST METHODS: Maximutn Density & Opt Moisture ASTM D1557 70 Density of Soil In-Place AJ-mnJccJ'!? Soil Expansion ~ T r^?^?i^£?' ^^^^ ^^^^ 7 Shear Strength " 29-2 <3r«dation & Gmin Size " ^'^'l^ CjillaryMoistureTension IASSJSI 25 Organic Content t J^- D2325-68 - Weight loss after heating for 24 hours at 300" F and after deducting soil moisttire. LIMITING SOIL CONDITIONS- M-imum Compaction 90% for 'di.stt.bed' soils. (F,xisting fill r^^wly placed fill, plowed ground, etc.) «4 /o for natural, undistwbed soils 95 /o for pavement subgrade within 2' of Expansive Soils F™?^ ^ P^y^ent base course, msufficientfines tS^^o^'^^'f''' Oversized Particles ^OSI'T^^T^S B^S^I^Jl^i!' .^'' ^'^^ TO RECEIVE FILL. Brush, trash, debris and detrimeuial I.M 1 . Detrimental soils shall be removedto firm.!^^^ feared from the areas to receive fill Stepped uphill with benches W or gr^rmTdK^^* '^"^'^'''^ ^^''^ ^^«"1<^ Cf'rapact. ^ ^*^^'^^^^ea to receive fill to 6" depth and IOMEGA FTP 1 006/007 07/09/2013 07:33 FTP Gieg Goertzen FileNo.n47Jl-13 June 25,2013 FILL MATERIAL shall not contain insufRcient fine."!, oversized particles, or excessive organics. On-site disposition of oversized rock or expansive soil.s is to be at the written direction of the Engineer. Select fill shall be as specified by the engineer. All fills shall be compacted and tested. SUBDRAINS shall be instaUed if required by and as directed by and detailed by the engineer and shall be left operable and unobstructed. They shall consist of 3" plastic perforated pipe sa in a minimum cover of 4" of filter rock in a "vee' ditch to intercept and drain free ground from the mass fills. Perforated pipe .shall be schedule 40, Poly-Vinyl-Chloride or Acrylonitrile Butadienne Styrene plastic. Rock filter material shall confomi to ttie following gradation: Sieve size: %Passing: 3/4" 90-100 #4 25-50 #30 5-20 #200 0-7 Subdrains shall be set at a minimum gradient of 0,2% to drain by giavity and shall be tested by dye flushing before acceptance. Drains found inoperable shall be excavated and replaced. CAPPING EXPANSIVE SOILS: If capping expansive soils with non-cxpansive soil to mitigate the expansive potential is used, the cap should be compacted, non-expansive, select soil placed for a minimum thickness 3' over the expansive soil and for a minimum distance of 8' beyond the exterior perimeter of the structure. Special precautions should be taken to ensure that the non-expansive soil remains uncontaminated and the minimum thickness and dimensions around the structure are maintained. The expansive soils underlying the cap of non-expansive cap should be pre-saturated to a depth of 3' to obtain a degree satumtion exceeding 90% before any construction supported by the compacted cap. Thc non-expansive soil comprising the cap should confoim to the following: Minimum Compaction 90 % Maximum Expansion Index 30 Minimum Angle of Internal Friction 33 Deg Cohesion Intercept 100 psf UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS: Soil Testers assume no responsibility for conditions which differ from those described in the applicable current reports and documents tbr this property. Upon termination of the engineer's services for any reason, his fees up to the time of termination become due and payable. If it is necessaiy for the engineer to issue an unfavorable report concerning the work that he has been hired to test and inspect, the engineer shall not be held liable for any damages that might result ftom his 'unfavorable report*. 07/09/2013 07:33 FTP IOMEGA FTP 1 007/007 Greg Goertzen FileNo.n47J1.13 June 25,2013 Respectfiilly submitted. Chin C. Chen, RPE C34442 CCC/ss CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING. INC. m\ Mimiiti ROSS, SuiTE ns l ESCOMIDO, C* nm 176!ij48.<95s i m m.nt.sm PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED GORTZEN HOMES DEVELOPMENT NORTHEAST OF VENADO AND ESFERA STREETS (APN: 223-250-14) CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: GOERTZEN HOMES AND GS DEVELOPMENTS ATTENTION: MR. GREG GOERTZEN P.O. BOX 91335 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92169 Prepared by: CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. 1441 MONTIEL ROAD, SUITE 115 ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92026 CTE JOB NO.: 10-11657G December 16, 2013 SAH DIEQO I flIVERSlOE i VENTURA I MERCED ! TflACY I SACRAMfNTO i PASAOEHA 1 HA6ATHA, 6UAM QEOTECHNICAl I ENVIRONMENTAL | CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND TESTINS 1 CIVIL ENGINEIRINS I SURVEYIN6 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Scope of Services 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2 3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 2 3.1 Field Investigation 2 3.2 Laboratory Testing 3 4.0 GEOLOGY 4 4.1 General Setting 4 4.2 Geologic Conditions 4 4.2.1 Previously Placed Fill 4 4.2.2 Metavolcanic Rock 5 4.3 Groundwater Conditions 5 4.4 Geologic Hazards 5 4.4.1 Surface Fauh Rupture 6 4.4.2 Local and Regional Faulting 6 4.4.3 Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement Evaluation 7 4.4.4 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation 7 4.4.5 Landsliding 8 4.4.6 Compressible and Expansive Soils 8 4.4.7 Corrosive Soils 8 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 5.1 General 9 5.2 Site Preparation 10 5.3 Site Excavation 11 5.4 Subdrains and Fill Placement and Compaction 12 5.5 Fill Materials 12 5.6 Temporary Construction Slopes 13 5.7 Foundations and Slab Recommendations 14 5.7.1 Foundations 14 5.7.2 Foundation Settlement 15 5.7.3 Foundation Setback 16 5.7.4 Interior Concrete Slabs 16 5.8 Seismic Design Criteria 17 5.9 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures 18 5.10 Exterior Flatwork 20 5.11 Vehicular Pavements 20 5.12 Drainage 21 5.13 Slopes 22 5.14 Construction Observation 22 5.14 Plan Review 23 6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION 23 FIGURES FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 FIGURE 4 SITE LOCATION MAP GEOLOGIC/ EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP REGIONAL FAULT AND SEISMICITY MAP GEOLOGIC/EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP APPENDICES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D REFERENCES FIELD EXPLORATION METHODS AND BORING LOGS LABORATORY METHODS AND RESULTS STANDARD GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 1 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE QF SERVICES 1.1 Introduction This report presents the results of the preliminary geotechnical investigation, performed by Construction Testing and Engineering, Inc. (CTE), and provides conclusions and recommendations for the proposed improvements at the subject site located northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets in Carlsbad, Califomia. We have performed this work in general accordance with the terms of our proposal no. G-2897, dated June 28, 2013. CTE understands that the proposed development consists of grading the site to create two building pads to construct residential structures with associated improvements. Other associated improvements will likely consist of retaining walls, landscaping, utilities, and flatwork. Preliminary recommendations for excavations, fill placement, and foundation design for the proposed improvements are presented in this report. Reviewed references are provided in Appendix A. 1.2 Scope of Services The scope of services provided included: • Review of readily available geologic and soils reports. • Site Reconnaissance. • Excavation of limited access exploratory borings and track-hoe excavator test pits for soil sampling and observation. • Laboratory testing of selected soil samples. • Description of site geology and evaluation of potential geologic hazards. • Engineering and geologic analysis. • Preparation of this summary report. \\Esc_server\projects\ 10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical.doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 2 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets (APN: 223-250-14) in Carlsbad, Califomia (Figure 1). The site currently consists of an undeveloped building pad supporting bushes and trees as well as stockpiled rock and soil. Existing site conditions are illustrated on Figure 2. Based on reconnaissance and review of area topography, the slightly southwest sloping site is located at the base of an approximately 40-foot high 2:1 to 4:1 (horizontal: vertical) slope to the northeast with lesser slopes ascending up to Esfera Street to the southeast, Venado Street to the southwest and a residence to the northwest. Surface elevations at the site range from approximately 305 feet above mean sea level (msl) in the southern portion of the site to approximately 360 feet msl in the northern portion of the site. 3.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 3.1 Field Investigation CTE conducted the field investigations on November 25 and December 3, 2013. Investigations consisted of a visual site reconnaissance and excavation of three limited access exploratory borings followed by excavating two deep test pits with an excavator. The borings were excavated with a limited access tri-pod drill rig equipped with six-inch diameter solid-stem augers that were advanced to refusal at a maximum depth of approximately five feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). Bulk and relatively undisturbed driven samples were collected from the cuttings and by driven Modified Califomia sampler. \\Esc_server\projects\ 10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 3 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G After encountering significant rock fills in the borings and reviewing the previously prepared "Final Report on Compacted Filled Ground" (Benton Engineering, Inc. 1977), we mobilized a 15,000 pound track-hoe type excavator to better determine the limits of the rock fills. Our two test pit locations were based on the mapped rock fill areas presented on the figures in the referenced report. Test Pit T-1 in the southem portion of the site extended to a depth of approximately 22 feet bgs and Test Pit T-2 extended to a depth of approximately 20 feet bgs. Bulk samples were collected from the cuttings. The soils were logged in the field by a CTE Geologist and visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. The field descriptions have been modified, where appropriate, to reflect laboratory test results. Boring and Test Pit logs, including descriptions of the soils encountered are included in Appendix B. The approximate locations ofthe explorations are presented on Figure 2. 3.2 Laboratorv Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on selected soil samples for classification purposes and to evaluate physical properties and engineering characteristics. Laboratory tests included: Modified Proctor, Expansion Index, gradation, Atterberg Limits and chemical characteristics for corrosivity. Test descriptions and laboratory test results are included in Appendix C. \\Esc_server\projects\10-l 1657G\Rpt_Geotechnical.doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 4 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-116570 4.0 GEOLOGY 4.1 General Setting San Diego is located with the Peninsular Ranges physiographic province, which is characterized by northwest-trending mountain ranges, intervening valleys, and predominantly northwest trending regional faults. The San Diego Region can be further subdivided into the coastal plain area, a central mountain-valley area and the eastem mountain valley area. The project site is located within the coastal plain area, which ranges in approximate elevation from sea level to 1200 feet above mean sea level and is characterized by Cretaceous and Tertiary sedimentary deposits that onlap an eroded basement surface consisting of Jurassic and Cretaceous crystalline rocks. 4.2 Geologic Conditions Based on the regional geologic map prepared by Kennedy and Tan (2005), the surficial geologic unit underlying the site consists of Metavolcanic rock. However, based on our explorations, Quatemary Previously Placed Fill Soil was found to overlie the Metavolcanic bedrock. Descriptions ofthe geologic units are presented below. 4.2.1 Previouslv Placed Fill The Previously Placed Fill deposits were encountered in all the explorations and were observed to a maximum depth of approximately 22 feet below ground surface (bgs) in Test Pit T-1. Where observed, this material generally consists of loose to medium dense, dry to wet, light grayish brown to reddish brown, clayey fine to medium grained sand with gravel. The fill slope in the northem portion ofthe site appears to consist of a significantly deep rock fill with a thin layer of previously placed fill at the surface. Other rock fills would \\Esc_server\projects\ 10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical .doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 5 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G likely be encountered in isolated locations at depth throughout the site. In addition, an old channel that has been filled in appears to run through the near central and southeastem portion ofthe site with fill depths greater than 50 feet based on the previous report (Benton 1977). 4.2.2 Metavolcanic Rock Metavolcanic rock is anticipated at depth throughout the site and was encountered in Test Pit T-2 at a depth of approximately 19 feet. Where observed, this unit was found to consist of moderately weathered Metavolcanic rock that generally excavated to angular gravel and cobble sized clasts. 4.3 Groundwater Conditions Subsurface water, likely perched, was encountered at depths of approximately 19 feet bgs and 15 feet bgs in Test Pits T-1 and T-2, respectively. Subsurface water elevations are anticipated to fluctuate following periods of sustained precipitation or excessive irrigation. Perched groundwater conditions could also be encountered in other areas given the nature of the subsurface lithologies with variable permeability. Therefore, it is anticipated that subsurface water could require diversion or mitigation measures during grading operations. Due to the variable site conditions, it is generally recommended to install a subdrain beneath and across the proposed building pads. 4.4 Geologic Hazards Geologic hazards that were considered to have potential impacts to site development were evaluated based on field observations, literature review, and laboratory test results. Based on this information and the conditions observed during our study, it appears that the geologic hazards at the site are \\Esc_server\projects\10-l 1657G\Rpt_Geotechnical.doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 6 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G primarily limited to those caused by shaking from earthquake-generated ground motions. The following paragraphs discuss the geologic hazards considered and their potential risk to the site. 4.4.1 Surface Fault Rupture Based on the site reconnaissance and review of referenced literature, the site is not within a City-designated fault zone or State of California-designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Studies Zone and no known active fault traces underlie or project toward the site. According to the Califomia Division of Mines and Geology, a fault is active if it displays evidence of activity in the last 11,000 years (Hart and Bryant, revised 2007). Therefore, the potential for surface rupture from displacement or fault movement beneath the proposed improvements is considered to be low. 4.4.2 Local and Regional Faulting The Califomia Geological Survey (CGS) and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) broadly group faults as "Class A" or "Class B" (Cao, 2003; Frankel et al., 2002). Class A faults are identified based upon relatively well-defined paleoseismic activity, and a fault-slip rate of more than 5 millimeters per year (mm/yr). In contrast, Class B faults have comparatively less defined paleoseismic activity and are considered to have a fault-slip rate less than 5 mm/yr. The nearest known Class B fault is the Rose Canyon Fault, which is approximately 11.5 kilometers west of the site (Blake, T.F., 2000). The nearest known Class A fault is the Julian segment of the Elsinore Fault, which is located approximately 38.5 kilometers east of the site. Regional faults are presented on Figure 3. \\Esc_server\projects\ 10-1165 7G\Rpt_Geotechnical .doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 7 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16, 2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G The site could be subjected to significant shaking in the event of a major earthquake on any of the faults listed above or other faults in the southem Califomia or northem Baja Califomia area. 4.4.3 Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement Evaluation Liquefaction occurs when saturated fine-grained sands or silts lose their physical strengths during earthquake-induced shaking and behave like a liquid. This is due to loss of point-to-point grain contact and transfer of normal stress to the pore water. Liquefaction potential varies with water level, soil type, material gradation, relative density, and probable intensity and duration of ground shaking. Seismic settlement can occur with or without liquefaction; it results from densification of loose soils. The site is underlain by compacted fill and very dense Metavolcanic bedrock. Therefore, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction or seismic settlement at the site is low. 4.4.4 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation According to McCulloch (1985), the potential in the San Diego County coastal area for " 100-year" and "500-year" tsunami waves is approximately five and eight feet, or less. This suggests that there is a low probability of a tsunami reaching the site based on elevation above sea level. In addition, Califomia Emergency Management Agency mapping (San Onofre Bluff Quadrangle, 2009) indicates that the site is not susceptible to tsunami inundation. Oscillatory waves (seiches) are considered unlikely due to the absence of large adjacent bodies of water. \\Esc_server\projects\ 10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical. doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 8 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G 4.4.5 Landsliding According to mapping by Tan and Griffen (1995), the northeastem portion of site is considered "generally susceptible" to landsliding. However, no landslides are mapped in the site area. In addition, landslides were not encountered during our field exploration, and they were not indicated in the referenced report. Therefore, landsliding is not considered a significant geologic hazard within or adjacent to the site. 4.4.6 Compressible and Expansive Soils Based on observations and testing, the upper portion of the Previously Placed Fill is considered to be potentially compressible in its current condition. Therefore, it is recommended that these soils be overexcavated and properly compacted as recommended herein. Rock fills are not anticipated to be compressible. Based on the field data, site observations, and experience with similar soils in the vicinity of the site, the underlying Metavolcanic bedrock is not considered to be subject to significant compressibility under the proposed loads. Based on geologic observation, the near-surface materials generally have low expansion potential (El of 50 or less). Therefore, the presence of expansive materials is not anticipated to adversely impact the proposed improvements based on the recommendations provided herein. 4.4.7 Corrosive Soils Testing of representative site soils was performed to evaluate the potential corrosive effects on concrete foundations and buried metallic improvements. Soil environments detrimental \\Esc_server\proj ects\ 10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical .doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 9 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G to concrete generally have elevated levels of soluble sulfates and/or pH levels less than 5.5. According to the American Concrete Institute (ACI) Table 318 4.3.1, specific guidelines have been provided for concrete where concentrations of soluble sulfate (SO4) in soil exceed 0.10 percent by weight. These guidelines include low water: cement ratios, increased compressive strength, and specific cement type requirements. A minimum resistivity value less than approximately 5,000 ohm-cm and/or soluble chloride levels in excess of 200 ppm generally indicate a corrosive environment for buried metallic utilities and untreated conduits. Chemical test results indicate that near-surface soils at the site present a negligible corrosion potential for Portland cement concrete. Based on resistivity testing, the site soils appear to have a severe corrosivity potential to buried metallic improvements. As such, it would appear prudent for buried utilities to utilize plastic piping and/or conduits, where feasible. However, CTE does not practice corrosion engineering. Therefore, if corrosion of improvements is of more significant concem, a qualified corrosion engineer could be consulted. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS S.l General CTE concludes that the proposed development of the site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the recommendations in this report are incorporated into the design and construction of the \\Esc_server\projects\10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical.doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 10 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16, 2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G project. Recommendations for the proposed earthwork and improvements are included in the following sections and Appendix D. However, recommendations in the text ofthis report supersede those presented in Appendix D should conflicts exist. These recommendations should either be confirmed as appropriate or updated during or following rough grading of the site. 5.2 Site Preparation Following removal of the existing trees/shrubs and bmsh that are not to remain, the proposed improvement areas should be cleared of existing debris and deleterious materials. Objectionable materials, such as vegetation, and other deleterious materials not suitable for structural backfill should be properly disposed of off site. In areas to receive stmctures, expansive, surficially eroded, desiccated, burrowed, or otherwise loose or disturbed soils should be excavated to a minimum depth of four feet below existing grades or to the depth of suitable material, whichever is deeper. In the area of proposed retaining walls overexcavation should extend a minimum of two feet below and behind the wall footing(s) and suitable soil placed in the void. In addition, rock fill slopes should be capped with a minimum 12 inches of suitable soil. The attached Figure 4 shows the conceptual geometry for the recommended soil cap over the rock fill. Density testing should be performed on any Previously Placed Fill to remain in place in order to confirm that it meets the minimum recommendations presented herein. Excavations should extend laterally at least five feet beyond the limits of the proposed structures or the distance resulting from a 1:1 (horizontal: vertical) extending from the bottom outside edge of the footings, whichever is greater. \\Esc_server\projects\10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical .doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 11 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G Due to the anticipated need to generate compactable fill soils at the site, the aforementioned minimum overexcavation depths could be disregarded and instead all existing suitable soil across the site could be excavated and stockpiled for use as compacted fill. This should minimize the amount of import soils, if necessary. An engineer or geologist from CTE should observe the exposed ground surface or bottom of overexcavations prior to placement of compacted fill to verify competent underlying materials. After approval by this office, exposed soil subgrades should be scarified a minimum of six inches, moisture conditioned, and properly compacted prior to receiving fill. If encountered, existing below ground utilities should be removed or redirected around stmctures. Utilities that are to extend through the proposed footings should be sleeved and caulked to minimize the potential for moisture migration below the structure slab. Abandoned pipes exposed by grading should be securely capped to prevent moisture from migrating beneath foundation and slab soils. 5.3 Site Excavation Based on investigation observations, shallow excavations at the site should be feasible using well- maintained heavy-duty construction equipment run by experienced operators. However, oversized rock has been observed in our explorations and may be encountered throughout the site which may require special handling. Also, if excavations are to extend into the Metavolcanic rock, excavation should be very difficult and could require specialized equipment. \\Esc_server\projects\ 10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical.doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 12 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16, 2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G 5.4 Subdrains and Fill Placement and Compaction Due to the variable site conditions, it is generally recommended to install a subdrain beneath and across the proposed building pads. The subdrains should extend below and behind any retaining walls, and are envisioned to extend across and below the proposed building footprints. Retaining wall drains may be connected to the subdrains. The subdrains should outlet our daylight to a suitable storm drain or area as per the project civil engineer or record. Following recommended removals of any loose or disturbed soils, the areas to receive fills or improvements exposed soils should be scarified a minimum of six inches, moisture conditioned, and properly compacted. Exposed rock fill areas should be sufficiently flooded with sand to fill rock fill void space and proof rolled to the degree feasible prior to placing fills. Fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent at a moisture content of at least two percent above optimum, as evaluated by ASTM D 1557. The optimum lift thickness for fill soil will depend on the type of compaction equipment used. Generally, backfill should be placed in uniform, horizontal lifts not exceeding eight inches in loose thickness. Fill placement and compaction should be conducted in conformance with local ordinances. 5.5 Fill Materials Very low to low expansion potential soils derived from the on-site materials are considered suitable for reuse on the site as compacted fill. If used, these materials should be screened of degradable debris or organics and materials generally greater than three inches in maximum dimension. Irreducible materials greater than three inches in maximum dimension generally should not be used \\Esc_server\projects\l 0-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical.doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 13 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16, 2013 CTE Job No. 10-11657G in shallow fills (within three feet of proposed grades). In utility trenches, adequate bedding should surround pipes. Imported fill beneath stmctures and distress sensitive surface improvements such as pavements or flatwork should have an Expansion Index of 20 or less (ASTM D 4829). Imported fill soils for use in stmctural or slope areas should be evaluated by the soils engineer before importation to the site. Retaining wall backfill located within a 45-degree wedge extending up from the bottom of the heel of the wall foundation should consist of soil having an Expansion Index of 20 or less (ASTM D 4829) with less than 30 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. As such, some onsite soils may not be suitable for use as wall backfill. The upper 12 to 18 inches of wall backfill could consist of lower permeability soils, in order to reduce surface water infiltration behind walls. The project structural engineer and/or architect should detail proper wall backdrains, including gravel drain zone fills, filter fabric, and perforated drain pipes. 5.6 Temporarv Construction Slopes The following recommended slopes should be relatively stable against deep-seated failure, but may experience localized sloughing. On-site soils are considered Type B and Type C soils with recommended slope ratios as set forth in the table below. \\Esc_server\projects\ 10-116S7G\Rpt_Geotechnical doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16, 2013 Page 14 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G TABLE 5.6 RECO.MMENDED TEMPORARY SLOPE RATIOS SOIL TYPE SLOPE RATIO (Horizontal: vertical) MAXIMUM HEIGHT B (Metavolcanic rock) 1:1 (OR FLATTER) 10 Feet C (Previously Placed Fill) 1.5:1 (OR FLATTER) 10 Feet Actual field conditions and soil type designations must be verified by a "competent person" while excavations exist, according to Cal-OSHA regulations. In addition, the above sloping recommendations do not allow for surcharge loading at the top of slopes by vehicular traffic, equipment or materials. Appropriate surcharge setbacks must be maintained from the top of all unshored slopes. 5.7 Foundations and Slab Recommendations The following recommendations are for preliminary design purposes only. These recommendations should be reviewed after completion of earthwork to verify that conditions exposed are as anticipated and that the recommended structure design parameters are appropriate. 5.7.1 Foundations Continuous and isolated spread footings are suitable for use at this site. We anticipate that all building footings will be founded entirely in properly compacted fill derived from onsite materials as recommended herein with a low expansion potential (Expansion Index of 50 or less). Foundation dimensions and reinforcement should be based on allowable bearing \\Esc_server\proj ects\ 10- U 6 5 7G\Rpt_Geotechnical .doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 15 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G values of2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for minimum 15-inch wide footings embedded at least 24 inches below the lowest adjacent subgrade. The allowable bearing value may be increased by 200 psf for each additional six inches of embedment, up to a maximum value of 3,000 psf. However, if footings are deepened, the overexcavation depths should also be deepened in order to maintain a minimum two feet of properly compacted fill soil below the bottoms of all footings. The allowable bearing value may also be increased by one-third for short-duration loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces. An uncorrected subgrade modulus of 130 pounds per cubic inch is considered suitable for elastic foundation design. Minimum footing reinforcement for continuous or spread footings should be as per the structural engineer. However, we recommend continuous footing reinforcement consist of a minimum of two #5 bars near the top and two #5 bars near the bottom. The structural engineer should provide recommendations for reinforcement of any spread footings and footings with pipe penetrations. Footing excavations should generally be maintained at above optimum moisture content until concrete placement. 5.7.2 Foundation Settlement The maximum total static settlement is expected to be on the order of one inch and the maximum differential settlement is expected to be on the order of V2 inch. Due to the absence of a shallow stabilized groundwater table and the generally dense nature of \\Esc_server\projects\10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical.doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 16 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G underlying materials, dynamic settlement is not expected to adversely affect the proposed improvements. 5.7.3 Foundation Setback Footings for stmctures should be designed such that the horizontal distance from the face of adjacent slopes to the outer edge of the footing is at least 10 feet. In addition, footings should bear beneath a 1:1 plane extended up from the nearest bottom edge of adjacent parallel trenches and/or excavations. Deepening of affected footings may be a suitable means of attaining the prescribed setbacks. 5.7.4 Interior Concrete Slabs Lightly loaded concrete slabs should be a minimum of 4.5 inches in thickness. Minimum slab reinforcement should consist of #3 reinforcing bars placed on maximum 16-inch centers, each way, at above mid-slab height, but with proper concrete cover. In moisture-sensitive floor areas, a suitable vapor retarder of at least ten-mil thickness (with all laps or penetrations sealed or taped) overlying a two-inch layer of consolidated aggregate base or sand (with SE of 30 or more) should be installed. An optional maximum two-inch layer of similar material may be placed above the vapor retarder to help protect the membrane during steel and concrete placement. This recommended protection is generally considered typical in the industry. If proposed floor areas or coverings are considered especially sensitive to moisture emissions, additional recommendations from a specialty consultant could be obtained. CTE is not an expert at preventing moisture penetration \\Esc_server\proj ects\ 10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical .doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 17 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G through slabs. A qualified architect or other experienced professional should be contacted if moisture penetration is a more significant concem. Slabs subjected to heavier loads may require thicker slab sections and/or increased reinforcement. A 120-pci subgrade modulus is considered suitable for elastic design of minimally embedded improvements such as slabs-on-grade. Subgrade materials should generally be maintained near or above optimum moisture content until slab underlayment or concrete are placed. 5.8 Seismic Design Criteria The seismic ground motion values listed in the table below were derived in accordance with both the Califomia Building Code (CBC), 2010, and the ASCE 7-10 Standard that is incorporated into the Califomia Building Code 2013 (that are scheduled to take affect this coming January 1,2014). This was accomplished by establishing the Site Class based on the soil properties at the site, and then calculating the site coefficients and parameters using the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Java Ground Motion Parameter Calculator - Version 5.1.0 for the 2010 CBC values, and the United States Geological Survey Seismic Design Maps application for the 2013 CBC values. Results for each set of seismic ground motion values were based on the site coordinates of 33.0851 ° latitude and -117.2350° longitude. These values are intended for the design of structures to resist the effects of earthquake ground motions. \\Esc_server\projects\10-l 1657G\Rpt_Geotechnical.doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16, 2013 Page 18 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G TABLE 5.8 SEISMIC GROUND MOTION VALUES PARAMETER CBC 2010 CBC 2013 CBC REFERENCE Site Class D D Table 1613.5.2 Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, Ss 1.118 1.030 Figure 1613.5(3) Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, Si 0.420 0.399 Figure 1613.5(4) Seismic Coefficient, Fa 1.053 1.088 Table 1613.5.3(1) Seismic Coefficient, Fy 1.58 1.602 Table 1613.5.3(2) MCE Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SMS 1.178 1.121 Section 1613.5.3 MCE Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SMI 0.664 0.639 Section 1613.5.3 Design Spectral Response Acceleration, Parameter SDS 0.785 0.747 Section 1613.5.4 Design Spectral Response Acceleration, Parameter SDI 0.442 0.426 Section 1613.5.4 5.9 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures Lateral loads acting against stmctures may be resisted by friction between the footings and the supporting soil or passive pressure acting against structures. If frictional resistance is used, we recommend allowable coefficients of friction of 0.30 (total frictional resistance equals the coefficient of friction multiplied by the dead load) for concrete cast directly against compacted fill. A design passive resistance value of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of depth (with a maximum value of 1,250 pounds per square foot) may be used. The allowable lateral resistance can be taken as the sum of the frictional resistance and the passive resistance, provided the passive resistance does not exceed two-thirds of the total allowable resistance. \\Esc_server\projects\l 0-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical.doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16, 2013 Page 19 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G Retaining walls up to approximately eight feet high and backfilled using granular soils may be designed using the equivalent fluid weights given in Table 5.9 below. LQi:IVAI.I;NT FI.I IIJ i M r w LIGH I S WALL TYPE LEVEL BACKFILL SLOPE BACKFILL 2:1 (HORIZONTAL: VERTICAL) CANTILEVER WALL (YIELDING) 35 60 RESTRAINED WALL 55 80 Lateral pressures on cantilever retaining walls (yielding walls) due to earthquake motions may be calculated based on work by Seed and Whitman (1970). The total lateral thmst against a properly drained and backfilled cantilever retaining wall above the groundwater level can be expressed as: PAE = PA + APAE For non-yielding (or "restrained") walls, the total lateral thmst may be similarly calculated based on work by Wood (1973): PKE = PK + APKE Where PA = Static Active Thmst (given previously Table 5.9) PK = Static Restrained Wall Thrust (given previously Table 5.9) APAE - Dynamic Active Thrust Increment = (3/8) kh yrf APKE - Dynamic Restrained Thmst Increment = kh yrf kh = '/a Peak Ground Acceleration = '/2 (SDS/2.5) H = Total Height ofthe Wall y = Total Unit Weight of Soil 135 pounds per cubic foot \\Esc_server\projects\10-l 1657G\Rpt_Geotechnical.doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 20 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G The increment of dynamic thrust in both cases should be distributed trapezoidally (essentially an inverted triangle), with a line of action located at 0.6H above the bottom of the wall. These values assume non-expansive backfill and free-draining conditions. Measures should be taken to prevent moisture buildup behind all retaining walls. Drainage measures should include free- draining backfill materials and sloped, perforated drains. These drains should discharge to an appropriate off-site location. Any waterproofing should be as specified by the project architect. 5.10 Exterior Flatwork To reduce the potential for cracking in exterior flatwork caused by minor movement of subgrade soils and concrete shrinkage, we recommend that such flatwork measure a minimum 4.5 inches in thickness and be installed with crack-control joints at appropriate spacing as designed by the project architect. Additionally, we recommend that flatwork be installed with at least number 3 reinforcing bars on maximum 24-inch centers, each way, at above mid-height of slab, but with proper concrete cover, or with other reinforcement per the project consultants. All subgrades should be prepared according to the earthwork recommendations previously given before placing concrete. Positive drainage should be established and maintained next to all flatwork. Subgrade materials shall be maintained at, or be elevated to, above optimum moisture content until just prior to concrete placement. 5.11 Vehicular Pavements It is anticipated that the proposed development will include paved vehicle drive and parking areas. The upper 12 inches of subgrade and any base materials beneath pavement areas should be \\Esc_server\proj ects\10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical .doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 21 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16,2013 CTE JobNo. 10-116S7G compacted to 95% relative compaction in accordance with ASTM D1557, at a minimum of two percent above optimum moisture content. Based on site soil conditions, it is recommended that concrete pavements be a minimum of five inches in thickness where subject to typical automobile and light pickup tmck traffic. Thicker sections could be warranted for large vehicles such as RVs or similar could be routinely driven or parked. Concrete paved areas should be designed and constmcted in accordance with the recommendations of the American Concrete Institute or other widely recognized authority, particularly with regard to thickened edges, joints, and drainage. Concrete pavements should have minimal reinforcement as per the recommendations for flatwork in Section 10 or, altematively, they could be unreinforced with expansion/contraction or constmction joint spacing no more than 24 time the pavement thickness in nearly square patterns. 5.12 Drainage Surface runoff should be collected and directed away from improvements by means of appropriate erosion-reducing devices and positive drainage should be established around the proposed improvements. Positive drainage should be directed away from improvements at a gradient of at least two percent for a distance of at least five feet. However, the project civil engineers should evaluate the on-site drainage and make necessary provisions to keep surface water from affecting the site. Generally, CTE recommends against allowing water to infiltrate building pads or adjacent to slopes. We understand that some agencies are requiring the use of storm water cleansing devices and encouraging the use of storm-water infiltration devices. Use of infiltration devices tends to increase \\Esc_server\projects\10- U 657G\Rpt_Geotechnical doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 22 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16, 2013 CTE JobNo. 10-11657G the possibility of high groundwater and slope instability. If storm water cleansing devices must be used, then we generally recommend that they be underlain by an impervious barrier and that the storm water be collected via subsurface piping and eventually discharged off site. 5.13 Slopes Based on anticipated soil strength characteristics, fill slopes should be constructed at slope ratios of 2:1 (horizontal: vertical) or flatter. These fill slope inclinations should exhibit factors of safety greater than 1.5. Although properly constmcted slopes on this site should be grossly stable, the soils will be somewhat erodible. Therefore, mnoff water should not be permitted to drain over the edges of slopes unless that water is confined to properly designed and constructed drainage facilities. Erosion-resistant vegetation should be maintained on the face of all slopes. Typically, soils along the top portion of a fill slope face will creep laterally. CTE recommends against building distress-sensitive hardscape improvements within five feet of slope crests. 5.14 Construction Observation The recommendations provided in this report are based on preliminary design information for the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions observed in the exploratory borings. The interpolated subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during construction to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Foundation recommendations may be revised upon completed improvement plans. \\Esc_server\projects\l 0-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical.doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 23 Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16, 2013 CTE JobNo. 10-116S7G Recommendations provided in this report are based on the understanding and assumption that CTE will provide the observation and testing services for the project. All earthwork should be observed and tested to verity that grading activity has been performed according to the recommendations contained within this report. The project engineer should evaluate all footing trenches before reinforcing steel placement. 5.14 Plan Review CTE should be authorized to review the project grading and foundation plans before commencement of earthwork to identify potential conflicts with the intent of the recommendations provided. 6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION The field evaluation, laboratory testing, and geotechnical analysis presented in this report have been conducted according to current engineering practice and the standard of care exercised by reputable geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made regarding the conclusions, recommendations and opinions expressed in this report. Variations may exist and conditions not observed or described in this report may be encountered during construction. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the \\Esc_server\projects\10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical.doc Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Goertzen Homes Development Northeast of Venado and Esfera Streets, Califomia December 16, 2013 Page 24 CTE Job No. 10-11657G findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years. CTE's conclusions and recommendations are based on an analysis ofthe observed conditions. If conditions different from those described in this report are encountered, our office should be notified and additional recommendations, if required, will be provided. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service on this project. Ifyou have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. Dan T. Math, GE #2665 Principal Engineer Aaron J. Beeby, CEG #2603 Certified Engineering Geologist AJB/DTM:nri \\Esc_server\proj ects\ 10-11657G\Rpt_Geotechnical .doc U ^jjCP2WEJ2r» T-2 r^gi B-3-0- Jsp LEGEND APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION QUATERNARY PREVIOUSLY PLACED FILL OVER JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ROCK FILL (OBSERVED AND INFERRED BY CTE) APPROXIMATE MAPPED LOCATION OF ^Q. ROCK Htt"(AS-GfiADED MAPS BENTON, 1977) 1 inch = 40'ft. CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ' PLANNING . CIVIL ENCINEEHINS - LAND SUAVEVING . GEOTECHNICAL C 1411 UDHTIEL ROAD, SUITE IIS ESCONDIDO CA. S2D2fi. PH.{76}] 74B-4S&S GEOLOGIC/EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP FBOFOSED eOERTZEN HOMES DETEU)F1IENT VDUDO SIRBT iMD N. Of ESRU SIIBET CiUdSBAD, CAUNRNU POBTIIS 10-11S576 1" = 40' 12/13 ff LEGEND U I ESFERA STREET i ^ IE. 318,73 "\i •1/W T-2 [S] APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION B-3 ^ APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION Qppf QUATERNARY PREVIOUSLY PLACED FILL OVER jgp JURASSIC SANTIAGO PEAK VOLCANICS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ROCK FILL (OBSERVED AND INFERRED BY CTE) APPROXIMATE MAPPED LOCATION OF ROCK FILL <AS-GRADED MAPS BENTON. 1977) 20" 40" 1 inch = 40" ft. vrrmw CONSTRUCTION TESTINGS ENGINEERING, INC. PLAKNING . CIVIL ENGINEERINe-UND SURVEYING • GEOTECHNICAI 1441 MONriEL SCAD. SUIIE I'S ESCONC DO CA. I2lli6. PH 17891 74S-4SSi GEOLOGIC/EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP PROPOSED GOERTZEN HOMES DEVELOPMENT VENADO STREET AND N. OF ESFERA STREET CARI2BAD, CAUFORNU 10-11B57G nrr 1' ' 40 —wmr 12/13 I 2 24" MINIMUM SLOPE PER GRADING PLAN -BENCHING ?4"MINJ I , 2% MIN CLEAN SAND SHOULD BE FLOODED INTO EXPOSED ROCK FILL SLOPE PRIOR TO PLACING FILL KEY-DIMENSION PER SOILS ENGINEER (4' MINIMUM) DIMENSIONS ARE MINIMUM RECOMMENDED CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. PLANNING -CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING - GEOTECHNICAL 1441 MONTIEL ROAD, SUITE 115 ESCONDIDO CA. 92026, PH:{760) 746-4955 PROPOSED SLOPE DETAIL PROPOSED GOERTZEN HOMES DEVEU>PMENT VENADO STREET AND N. OF ESFERA STREET CARISBAD, CAUFORNU SCALE: NOT TO SCAlf CTE JOB NO.: 10-116576 DATE: 12/13 nCURE: 4 APPENDIX A REFERENCES REFERENCES 1. ASTM, 2002, "Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort," Volume 04.08 2. Benton Engineering , Inc., 1977, Project No. 74-5-2D, Final Report on Compacted Filled Ground, La Costa Vale Unit Nos. 3 and 4, Carlsbad Tract Nos. 72-20 and 76-3, Carlsbad, Califomia, dated February 4. 3. Blake, T.F., 2000, "EQFAULT," Version 3.00b, Thomas F. Blake Computer Services and Software. 4. California Building Code, 2010, "Califomia Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2," Califomia Building Standards Commission, published by ICBO, June. 5. Califomia Division of Mines and Geology, CD 2000-003 "Digital Images of Official Maps of Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fauh Zones of Califomia, Southem Region," compiled by Martin and Ross. 6. Hart, Earl W., Revised 1994, Revised 2007, "Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in Califomia, Alquist Priolo, Special Studies Zones Act of 1972," Califomia Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42. 7. Jennings, Charles W., 1994, "Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas" with Locations and Ages of Recent Volcanic Eruptions. 8. Kennedy, M.P. and Tan, S.S., 2005, "Geologic Map ofthe Oceanside 30' x 60' Quadrangle, Califomia", Califomia Geological Survey, Map No. 2, Plate 1 of 2. 9. McCulloch, D.S., 1985, "Evaluating Tsunami Potential" in Ziony, J.L, ed.. Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region - An Earth-Science Perspective, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1360. 10. Rick Engineering Company, 1974, Grading Plans for Carlsbad Track No. 72-20 (La Costa Vale) Unit No. 3, Sheet 3 of 19, Drawing No. 176-2A. 11. Seed, H.B., and R.V. Whitman, 1970, "Design of Earth Retaining Structures for Dynamic Loads," in Proceedings, ASCE Specialty Conference on Lateral Stresses in the Ground and Design of Earth-Retaining Stmctures, pp. 103-147, Ithaca, New York: Comell University. 12. Tan, S. S., and Griffen, G., 1995, Landslide Hazards in the Northem Part of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, San Diego County, Califomia, Rancho Santa Fe Quadrangle Landslide Distribution Map - Plate 35E. 13. Wood, J.H. 1973, Earthquake-Induced Soil Pressures on Stmctures, Report EERL 73-05. Pasadena: Califomia Institute of Technology. APPENDIX B EXPLORATION LOGS CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING. INC. Mt; HDitmt nut. imn i istmm. CA $tm i m.ui-tm DEFINITION OF TERMS PRIMARY DIVISIONS SYMBOLS GW i§>f M GP ^ SECONDARY DIVISIONS z < ^ n 1^ td as < O o < > s < <^ 2 d e z H < GRAVELS MORE THAN HALF OF COARSE FRACTION IS LARGERTHAN NO. 4 SIEVE SANDS MORE THAN HALF OF COARSE FRACTION IS SMALLER THAN NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN GRAVELS < 5% FINES WELL GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURE! LITTLE OR NO FINES POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES LITTLE OF NO FINES GRAVELS WITH FINES ;.;iiWfi:ii ;.i!-i CLEAN SANDS < 5% FINES SANDS WITH FINES SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-SILT MIXTURES NON-PLASTIC FINES CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES PLASTIC FINES WELL GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR N( FINES POORLY GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES SILTY SANDS, SAND-SILT MIXTURES, NON-PLASTIC FINE; CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-CLAY MIXTURES, PLASTIC FINE! d o cc w s i SILTS AND CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT IS LESS THAN 50 INORGANIC SILTS, VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILT' OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS. SLIGHTLY PLASTIC CLAYEY SILT INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY GRAVELLY, SANDY, SILTS OR LEAN CLAY! ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICIT SILTS AND CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT IS GREATER THAN 50 INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SANDY OR SILTY SOILS. ELASTIC SILT! INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOIL! GRAIN SIZES BOULDERS COBBLES GRAVEL COARSE FINE SAND COARSE MEDIUM FINE SILTS AND CLAYS 12" 3" 3/4" CLEAR SQUARE SIEVE OPENING 10 40 200 U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE ADDITIONAL TESTS (OTHER THAN TEST PIT AND BORING LOG COLUMN HEADINGS) MAX- Maximum Dry Density GS- Grain Size Distribution SE- Sand Equivalent EI- Expansion Index CHM- Sulfate and Chloride Content, pH, Resistivity COR - Corrosivity SD- Sample Disturbed PM- Permeability SG- Specific Gravity HA- Hydrometer Analysis AL- Atterberg Limits RV- R-Value CN- Consolidation CP- Collapse Potential HC- HydrocoUapse REM- Remolded PP- Pocket Penetrometer WA- Wash Analysis DS- Direct Shear UC- Unconfined Compression MD- Moisture/Density M- Moisture SC- Swell Compression 01- Organic Impurities FIGURE:! BLl A. CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. Wl mmm tm. um iii i (scsmigii. zt nut i m.ut mi PROJECT: CTE JOB NO: LOGGED BY: DRILLER: DRILL METHOD: SAMPLE METHOD: SHEET: of DRILLING DATE: ELEVATION: Q BORING LEGEND DESCRIPTION Laboratory Tests 7 "SM" Block or Chunk Sample Bulk Sample Standard Penetration Test Modified Split-Barrel Drive Sampler (Cal Sampler) Thin Walled Army Corp. of Engineers Sample Groundwater Table Soil Type or Classification Change V 7 — Formation Change [(Approximate boundaries queried (?)1 Quotes are placed around classifications where the soils exist in situ as bedrock FIGURE: | BL2 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING. INC. CedftCHiiiCM I ttdSTiteGtioi) EiieiNEE«iiie Ttsiiiis mtPtttioit IMI Mtmici suo, swt lis I [stMiiBo. u am t m ttt tm PROJECT: GORTZEN HOME DEVELOPMENT CTE JOB NO: 10-11657G LOGGED BY: AJB DRILLER: DRILL METHOD: SAMPLE METHOD: MANSOLF SOILD-STEM AUGER BULK, RING, AND SPT SHEET: I of 1 DRILLING DATE: 11/25/2013 ELEVATION: -330 FEET 03 Q BORING: B-l DESCRIPTION Laboratory Tests SM QUATERNARY PREVIOUSLY PLACED FILL (Qppf): GP Loose to medium dense, dry to slightly moist, reddish brown, silty fineto medium grained SAND. Poorly graded rock fill, clasts fo approxiamfely 18" in diameter. Total Depth: 3' (Refusal on Gravel) No Groundwater Encountered -5- 40- -15- •20- -25- B-1 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING. INC. StOTCOmittl I CttlilllirCTIOli EKStUEEIIIIIS TtSTlHI iNSPtCtlDII i4« mmm mt. sum m s tstcMien. u tmt i m.m.im PROJECT: GORTZEN HOME DEVELOPMENT CTE JOB NO: I0-11657G LOGGED BY: AJB DRILLER: DRILL METHOD: SAMPLE METHOD: MANSOLF SOILD-STEM AUGER BULK, RING, AND SPT SHEET: 1 of 1 DRILLING DATE: 11/25/2013 ELEVATION: -316 FEET o s Q D BORING: B-2 DESCRIPTION Laboratory Tests SC QUATERNARY PREVIOUSLY PLACED FILL (Qppf): Loose to medium dense, dry to slightly moist, light grayish brown, clayey fine to medium grained SAND with angular gravel. -5-Total Depth: 4' (Refusal on Gravel) No Groundwater Encountered 40- 45- 50- '25- B-2 CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. setntcHNicM I cotiotiiciiati EKtiHceaiHe TESims «NO iKSPECTioN i4«i Mwiti tut, swn ti$ t [scDiitiiio. c« tm< im.tn.mi PROJECT: GORTZEN HOME DEVELOPMENT CTE JOB NO: 10-11657G LOGGED BY: AJB DRILLER: DRILL METHOD: SAMPLE METHOD: MANSOLF SOILD-STEM AUGER BULK, RING, AND SPT SHEET: 1 DRILLING DATE: ELEVATION: of 1 11/25/2013 -308 FEET « Q Q BORING: B-3 DESCRIPTION Laboratory Tests -0-SC QUATERNARY PREVIOUSLY PLACED FILL (Qppf): Loose to medium dense, dry to slightly moist, light grayish brown, clayey fine to medium grained SAND with angular gravel. MD, AL -5- Total Depth: 5' (Refusal on Gravel) No Groundwater Encountered 40- 45- 50- -25- B-3 t/ l-V- CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENG ^P*""" "••""'"'•''P'* tEOtEtBNICM I C«»SHOC1IO)1 EltBI<IE£«t«S TESIINIi *«0 IdSPl INEERING. INC. PROJECT: GORTZEN HOME DEVELOPMENT CTE JOB NO: 10-11657G LOGGED BY: AJB DRILLER: DRILL METHOD: SAMPLE METHOD: MANSOLF SOILD-STEM AUGER BULK, RING, AND SPT SHEET: 1 DRILLING DATE: ELEVATION: of 1 12/3/2013 -308 FEET o Q BORING: T-1 DESCRIPTION Laboratory Tests -5- 45- 50- sc QUATERNARY PREVIOUSLY PLACED FILL (Qppf): Loose to medium dense, dry to slightly moist, light grayish brown, to reddish gray, clayey fine grained SAND with angular gravel. MAX, EI, CHM Becomes reddish brown, fine to medium grained SAND with increased clay content. Approximately 20% angular gravel to 3" in diameter. GS CL Stiff, moist, reddish brown, fine to medium grained sandy CLAY. Approximely 20-30% angular gravel to 6" in diameter. AL GC/CL Medium dense, moist, reddish brown, clayey GRAVEL/ sandy CLAY with gravel. Approximately 40-60% angular gravel to 6" in diameter. CL Stiff, moist to wet, reddish brown, fine to medium grained sandy CLAY with gravel. Approximately 20% angular gravel to 6" in diameter. Groundwater seepage encountered at 19' Total Depth: 22' Groundwater Seepage Encountered at 19' -25- T-1 rTTp^ CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. ^ ^ i4«i MMHU M«». swt (IS i iKemiim. c» t»»« im,f4««s» PROJECT: GORTZEN HOME DEVELOPMENT CTE JOB NO: 10-11657G LOGGED BY: AJB DRILLER: DRILL METHOD: SAMPLE METHOD: MANSOLF SOILD-STEM AUGER BULK, RING, AND SPT SHEET: 1 of 1 DRILLING DATE: 12/3/2013 ELEVATION: -316 FEET Q 00 o •J BORING: T-2 DESCRIPTION Laboratory Tests -0-SC QUATERNARY PREVIOUSLY PLACED FILL (Qppf): -5- Loose to medium dense, dry to slightly moist, light grayish brown, to reddish gray, clayey fine grained SAND with angular gravel. Boulder to approximately 3' in diameter encountered Becomes reddish brown, fine to medium grained SAND with increased clay content. Approximately 20-30% angular gravel to 10" in diameter. At approxiamtely 6-9' discontinuous concentration of rock to 12" in diameter. 40- 45-Groundwater seepage encountered at 15' CL Stiff, wet, brown, fine to medium grained sandy CLAY with gravel. Approximely 30-40% angular gravel to 3" in diameter. GP 50- METAVQLCANIC ROCK: Moderately weathered metavolcanic rock, oxidized. Total Depth: 20' Groundwater Seepage Encountered at 15' 55- T-2 APPENDIX C LABORATORY METHODS AND RESULTS APPENDIX C LABORATORY METHODS AND RESULTS Laboratorv Testing Program Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to detect their relative engineering properties. Tests were performed following test methods of the American Society for Testing Materials or other accepted standards. The following presents a brief description ofthe various test methods used. Classification Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Visual classifications were supplemented by laboratory testing of selected samples according to ASTM D2487. The soil classifications are shown on the Exploration Logs in Appendix B. In-Place Moisture and Density To determine the moisture and density of in-place site soils, a representative sample was tested for the moisture and density at time of sampling. Modified Proctor To determine the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, a soil sample was tested in accordance with ASTMD-1557. Expansion Index Expansion testing was performed on selected samples of the matrix of the on-site soils according to ASTM D 4829. Atterberg Limits The procedure of ASTM D4518-84 was used to measure the liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of representative samples. Chemical Analvsis Soil materials were collected with sterile sampling equipment and tested for Sulfate and Chloride content, pH, Corrosivity, and Resistivity. CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. StDTCCHIIICIII. I CDIISIIIUCtllia EnilDKEKIIII! tESIINS iKV iKSffCltan 1441 ttamitniMii. s«iii It! I tjeoiHiiso, c»«}«» IIM.N» 4M» EXPANSION INDEX TEST LOCATION DEPTH (feet) ASTM D 4829 EXPANSION INDEX EXPANSION POTENTIAL T-1 0-6 44 LOW IN-PLACE MOISTURE AND DENSITY LOCATION DEPTH (feet) % MOISTURE DRY DENSITY B-3 3 SULFATE 14.8 81.7 LOCATION DEPTH (feet) RESULTS ppm T-1 0-6 CHLORIDE 118.8 LOCATION DEPTH (feet) RESULTS ppm T-1 0-6 p.H. 199 LOCATION DEPTH (feet) RESULTS T-1 0-6 5.2 LOCATION RESISTIVITY CALIFORNIA TEST 424 DEPTH (feet) RESULTS ohms/cm T-1 0-6 1080 ATTERBERG LIMITS LOCATION DEPTH (feet) LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX CLASSIFICATION B-3 T-1 3 13-15 45 39 30 21 CL CL LOCATION MODIFIED PROCTOR ASTM D 1557 DEPTH MAXIUM DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE (feet) (PCF) (%) T-1 6-10 113.8 14.4 LABORATORY SUMMARY CTE JOBNO. 10-11657G U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS Sample Designation T 1 Sample Deplh (feet) AID Symbol Liquid Limit (•/.) Plasticity Index Classification f /' ij-V- CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING. INC. i-l 0 O- lU 0 • 0 0 0 CTE JOB NUMBER: 10-11657G FIGURE: C-1 LABORATORY COMPACTION OF SOIL (MOD.) ASTM D 1557 Project Name: Goertzen Homes Ttiree-Lot Development Tested By: RJP Date: 12/4/13 Project No.: 10-11657 Calculated By: RJP Date: 12/4/13 Lab No.: 24175 Sampled By: AJB Date: 12/3/13 Sample No. : T-1 Depth (ft.) 6-10 Sample Description: Light Brown (Tan) Silty Sand Moisture Added (ml) 0 50 100 -50 TEST NO. 1 2 3 4 Dry Preparation Method: Moist X Wt. Comp. Soil + Mold (g) 3891 3940 3929 3801 Dry Preparation Method: Moist Wt. of Mold (g) 1971 1971 1971 1971 Net Wt. of Soil (g) 1920 1969 1958 1830 Mechanical Rammer X Manual Rammer Wet Wt. of Soil + Cont. (g) 143.2 163:7 128.4 150v3 Dry Wt. of Soil + Cont. (g) 126.5 142.0 109.4 135.0 Hammer Weight: 1 10.01b. { Wt. of Container (g) 0^ 0^^ ^00 Moisture Content (%) 13.2 15.3 11.3 Drop:| 18 in. ] Wet Density (pcf) 127.1 130.4 129.6 121.2 Mold Volume (ft.^):| 0.03330 | Dry Density (pcf) 112.3 113.1 110.4 108.8 PROCEDURE USED Procedure A Soil Passing No. 4 (4.75 mm) Sieve Mold: 4 in. (101.6 mm) diameter Layers: 5 (Five) Blows per layer: 25 (twenty-five) May be used if No.4 retained < 20% Procedure B Soil Passing 3/8 in. (9.5 mm) Sieve Mold; 4 in. (101.6 mm) diameter Layers: 5 (Five) Blows per layer: 25 (twenty-five) Use if + #4 > 20% and + 3/8" < 20% Procedure 0 Soil Passing 3/4 in. (19.0 mm) Sieve Mold: 6 in. (152.4 mm) diameter Layers: 5 (Five) Blows per layer: 56 (fifty-six) Use if + 3/8 in >20% and + % in <30% 125.0 1S.0 Moisture Content (%) 25.0 OVERSIZE FRACTION Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 1138 Total Sample Weight (g): | Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 1138 Weight Retained (g) Percent Retained Optimum Moisture Content (%) 14.4 Plus 3/4" Rock Correction Applied per ASTM D 4718 Maximum Dry Density (pcf) N/A Plus 3/8" Maximum Dry Density (pcf) N/A Optimum Moisture Content (%) N/A Plus #4 Optimum Moisture Content (%) N/A Proctor 24175 APPENDIX D STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Appendix D Page D-1 Standard Specifications for Grading Section 1 - General Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. presents the following standard recommendations for grading and other associated operations on construction projects. These guidelines should be considered a portion of the project specifications. Recommendations contained in the body of the previously presented soils report shall supersede the recommendations and or requirements as specified herein. The project geotechnical consultant shall interpret disputes arising out of interpretation of the recommendations contained in the soils report or specifications contained herein. Section 2 - Responsibilities of Proiect Personnel The geotechnical consultant should provide observation and testing services sufficient to general conformance with project specifications and standard grading practices. The geotechnical consultant should report any deviations to the client or his authorized representative. The Client should be chiefly responsible for all aspects of the project. He or his authorized representative has the responsibility of reviewing the findings and recommendations of the geotechnical consultant. He shall authorize or cause to have authorized the Contractor and/or other consultants to perform work and/or provide services. During grading the Client or his authorized representative should remain on-site or should remain reasonably accessible to all concemed parties in order to make decisions necessary to maintain the flow of the project. The Contractor is responsible for the safety of the project and satisfactory completion of all grading and other associated operations on construction projects, including, but not limited to, earth work in accordance with the project plans, specifications and controlling agency requirements. Section 3 - Preconstruction Meeting A preconstruction site meeting should be arranged by the owner and/or client and should include the grading contractor, design engineer, geotechnical consultant, owner's representative and representatives of the appropriate governing authorities. Section 4 - Site Preparation The client or contractor should obtain the required approvals from the controlling authorities for the project prior, during and/or after demolition, site preparation and removals, etc. The appropriate approvals should be obtained prior to proceeding with grading operations. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 1 of 26 Appendix D Page D-2 Standard Specifications for Grading Clearing and grubbing should consist of the removal of vegetation such as brush, grass, woods, stumps, trees, root of trees and otherwise deleterious natural materials from the areas to be graded. Clearing and grubbing should extend to the outside of all proposed excavation and fill areas. Demolition should include removal of buildings, structures, foundations, reservoirs, utilities (including underground pipelines, septic tanks, leach fields, seepage pits, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, etc.) and other man-made surface and subsurface improvements from the areas to be graded. Demolition of utilities should include proper capping and/or rerouting pipelines at the project perimeter and cutoff and capping of wells in accordance with the requirements of the goveming authorities and the recommendations of the geotechnical consultant at the time of demolition. Trees, plants or man-made improvements not planned to be removed or demolished should be protected by the contractor from damage or injury. Debris generated during clearing, grubbing and/or demolition operations should be wasted from areas to be graded and disposed off-site. Clearing, grubbing and demolition operations should be performed under the observation of the geotechnical consultant. Section 5 - Site Protection Protection of the site during the period of grading should be the responsibility of the contractor. Unless other provisions are made in writing and agreed upon among the concemed parties, completion of a portion of the project should not be considered to preclude that portion or adjacent areas from the requirements for site protection until such time as the entire project is complete as identified by the geotechnical consultant, the client and the regulating agencies. Precautions should be taken during the performance of site clearing, excavations and grading to protect the work site from fiooding, ponding or inundation by poor or improper surface drainage. Temporary provisions should be made during the rainy season to adequately direct surface drainage away from and off the work site. Where low areas cannot be avoided, pumps should be kept on hand to continually remove water during periods of rainfall. Rain related damage should be considered to include, but may not be limited to, erosion, silting, saturation, swelling, structural distress and other adverse conditions as determined by the geotechnical consultant. Soil adversely affected should be classified as unsuitable materials and should be subject to overexcavation and replacement with compacted fill or other remedial grading as recommended by the geotechnical consultant. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 2 of 26 Appendix D Page D-3 Standard Specifications for Grading The contractor should be responsible for the stability of all temporary excavations. Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant pertaining to temporary excavations (e.g., backcuts) are made in consideration of stability of the completed project and, therefore, should not be considered to preclude the responsibilities of the contractor. Recommendations by the geotechnical consultant should not be considered to preclude requirements that are more restrictive by the regulating agencies. The contractor should provide during periods of extensive rainfall plastic sheeting to prevent unprotected slopes from becoming saturated and unstable. When deemed appropriate by the geotechnical consultant or goveming agencies the contractor shall install checkdams, desilting basins, sand bags or other drainage control measures. In relatively level areas and/or slope areas, where saturated soil and/or erosion gullies exist to depths of greater than 1.0 foot; they should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill in accordance with the applicable specifications. Where affected materials exist to depths of 1.0 foot or less below proposed finished grade, remedial grading by moisture conditioning in-place, followed by thorough recompaction in accordance with the applicable grading guidelines herein may be attempted. If the desired results are not achieved, all affected materials should be overexcavated and replaced as compacted fill in accordance with the slope repair recommendations herein. If field conditions dictate, the geotechnical consultant may recommend other slope repair procedures. Section 6 - Excavations 6.1 Unsuitable Materials Materials that are unsuitable should be excavated under observation and recommendations of the geotechnical consultant. Unsuitable materials include, but may not be limited to, dry, loose, soft, wet, organic compressible natural soils and fractured, weathered, soft bedrock and nonengineered or otherwise deleterious fill materials. Material identified by the geotechnical consultant as unsatisfactory due to its moisture conditions should be overexcavated; moisture conditioned as needed, to a uniform at or above optimum moisture condition before placement as compacted fill. If during the course of grading adverse geotechnical conditions are exposed which were not anticipated in the preliminary soil report as determined by the geotechnical consultant additional exploration, analysis, and treatment of these problems may be recommended. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 3 of 26 Appendix D Page D-4 Standard Specifications for Grading 6.2 Cut Slopes Unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant and approved by the regulating agencies, permanent cut slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 (horizontal: vertical). The geotechnical consultant should observe cut slope excavation and if these excavations expose loose cohesionless, significantly fractured or otherwise unsuitable material, the materials should be overexcavated and replaced with a compacted stabilization fill. If encountered specific cross section details should be obtained from the Geotechnical Consultant. When extensive cut slopes are excavated or these cut slopes are made in the direction of the prevailing drainage, a non-erodible diversion swale (brow ditch) should be provided at the top of the slope. 6.3 Pad Areas All lot pad areas, including side yard terrace containing both cut and fill materials, transitions, located less than 3 feet deep should be overexcavated to a depth of 3 feet and replaced with a uniform compacted fill blanket of 3 feet. Actual depth of overexcavation may vary and should be delineated by the geotechnical consultant during grading, especially where deep or drastic transitions are present. For pad areas created above cut or natural slopes, positive drainage should be established away from the top-of-slope. This may be accomplished utilizing a berm drainage swale and/or an appropriate pad gradient. A gradient in soil areas away from the top-of-slopes of 2 percent or greater is recommended. Section 7 - Compacted Fill All fill materials should have fill quality, placement, conditioning and compaction as specified below or as approved by the geotechnical consultant. 7.1 Fill Material Oualitv Excavated on-site or import materials which are acceptable to the geotechnical consultant may be utilized as compacted fill, provided trash, vegetation and other deleterious materials are removed prior to placement. All import materials anticipated for use on-site should be sampled tested and approved prior to and placement is in conformance with the requirements outlined. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 4 of 26 Appendix D Page D-5 Standard Specifications for Grading Rocks 12 inches in maximum and smaller may be utilized within compacted fill provided sufficient fill material is placed and thoroughly compacted over and around all rock to effectively fill rock voids. The amount of rock should not exceed 40 percent by dry weight passing the 3/4-inch sieve. The geotechnical consultant may vary those requirements as field conditions dictate. Where rocks greater than 12 inches but less than four feet of maximum dimension are generated during grading, or otherwise desired to be placed within an engineered fill, special handling in accordance with the recommendations below. Rocks greater than four feet should be broken down or disposed off-site. 7.2 Placement of Fill Prior to placement of fill material, the geotechnical consultant should observe and approve the area to receive fill. After observation and approval, the exposed ground surface should be scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches. The scarified material should be conditioned (i.e. moisture added or air dried by continued discing) to achieve a moisture content at or slightly above optimum moisture conditions and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent ofthe maximum density or as otherwise recommended in the soils report or by appropriate govemment agencies. Compacted fill should then be placed in thin horizontal lifts not exceeding eight inches in loose thickness prior to compaction. Each lift should be moisture conditioned as needed, thoroughly blended to achieve a consistent moisture content at or slightly above optimum and thoroughly compacted by mechanical methods to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum dry density. Each lift should be treated in a like manner until the desired finished grades are achieved. The contractor should have suitable and sufficient mechanical compaction equipment and watering apparatus on the job site to handle the amount of fill being placed in consideration of moisture retention properties of the materials and weather conditions. When placing fill in horizontal lifts adjacent to areas sloping steeper than 5:1 (horizontal: vertical), horizontal keys and vertical benches should be excavated into the adjacent slope area. Keying and benching should be sufficient to provide at least six-foot wide benches and a minimum of four feet of vertical bench height within the firm natural ground, firm bedrock or engineered compacted fill. No compacted fill should be placed in an area after keying and benching until the geotechnical consultant has reviewed the area. Material generated by the benching operation should be moved sufficiently away from STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 5 of 26 Appendix D Page D-6 Standard Specifications for Grading the bench area to allow for the recommended review of the horizontal bench prior to placement of fill. Within a single fill area where grading procedures dictate two or more separate fills, temporary slopes (false slopes) may be created. When placing fill adjacent to a false slope, benching should be conducted in the same manner as above described. At least a 3-foot vertical bench should be established within the firm core of adjacent approved compacted fill prior to placement of additional fill. Benching should proceed in at least 3-foot vertical increments until the desired finished grades are achieved. Prior to placement of additional compacted fill following an ovemight or other grading delay, the exposed surface or previously compacted fill should be processed by scarification, moisture conditioning as needed to at or slightly above optimum moisture content, thoroughly blended and recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of laboratory maximum dry density. Where unsuitable materials exist to depths of greater than one foot, the unsuitable materials should be over-excavated. Following a period of flooding, rainfall or overwatering by other means, no additional fill should be placed until damage assessments have been made and remedial grading performed as described herein. Rocks 12 inch in maximum dimension and smaller may be utilized in the compacted fill provided the fill is placed and thoroughly compacted over and around all rock. No oversize material should be used within 3 feet of finished pad grade and within 1 foot of other compacted fill areas. Rocks 12 inches up to four feet maximum dimension should be placed below the upper 10 feet of any fill and should not be closer than 15 feet to any slope face. These recommendations could vary as locations of improvements dictate. Where practical, oversized material should not be placed below areas where structures or deep utilities are proposed. Oversized material should be placed in windrows on a clean, overexcavated or unyielding compacted fill or firm natural ground surface. Select native or imported granular soil (S.E. 30 or higher) should be placed and thoroughly flooded over and around all windrowed rock, such that voids are filled. Windrows of oversized material should be staggered so those successive strata of oversized material are not in the same vertical plane. It may be possible to dispose of individual larger rock as field conditions dictate and as recommended by the geotechnical consultant at the time of placement. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 6 of 26 Appendix D Page D-7 Standard Specifications for Grading The contractor should assist the geotechnical consultant and/or his representative by digging test pits for removal determinations and/or for testing compacted fill. The contractor should provide this work at no additional cost to the owner or contractor's client. Fill should be tested by the geotechnical consultant for compliance with the recommended relative compaction and moisture conditions. Field density testing should conform to ASTM Method of Test D 1556-00, D 2922-04. Tests should be conducted at a minimum of approximately two vertical feet or approximately 1,000 to 2,000 cubic yards of fill placed. Actual test intervals may vary as field conditions dictate. Fill found not to be in conformance with the grading recommendations should be removed or otherwise handled as recommended by the geotechnical consultant. 7.3 Fill Slopes Unless otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant and approved by the regulating agencies, permanent fill slopes should not be steeper than 2:1 (horizontal: vertical). Except as specifically recommended in these grading guidelines compacted fill slopes should be over-built two to five feet and cut back to grade, exposing the firm, compacted fill inner core. The actual amount of overbuilding may vary as field conditions dictate. If the desired results are not achieved, the existing slopes should be overexcavated and reconstmcted under the guidelines of the geotechnical consultant. The degree of overbuilding shall be increased until the desired compacted slope surface condition is achieved. Care should be taken by the contractor to provide thorough mechanical compaction to the outer edge of the overbuilt slope surface. At the discretion of the geotechnical consultant, slope face compaction may be attempted by conventional construction procedures including backrolling. The procedure must create a firmly compacted material throughout the entire depth of the slope face to the surface ofthe previously compacted firm fill intercore. During grading operations, care should be taken to extend compactive effort to the outer edge of the slope. Each lift should extend horizontally to the desired finished slope surface or more as needed to ultimately established desired grades. Grade during construction should not be allowed to roll off at the edge of the slope. It may be helpful to elevate slightly the outer edge of the slope. Slough resulting from the placement of individual lifts should not be allowed to drift down over previous lifts. At intervals not STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 7 of 26 Appendix D Page D-8 Standard Specifications for Grading exceeding four feet in vertical slope height or the capability of available equipment, whichever is less, fill slopes should be thoroughly dozer trackrolled. For pad areas above fill slopes, positive drainage should be established away from the top-of-slope. This may be accomplished using a berm and pad gradient of at least two percent. Section 8 - Trench Backfill Utility and/or other excavation of trench backfill should, unless otherwise recommended, be compacted by mechanical means. Unless otherwise recommended, the degree of compaction should be a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density. Within slab areas, but outside the influence of foundations, trenches up to one foot wide and two feet deep may be backfilled with sand and consolidated by jetting, flooding or by mechanical means. If on-site materials are utilized, they should be wheel-rolled, tamped or otherwise compacted to a firm condition. For minor interior trenches, density testing may be deleted or spot testing may be elected if deemed necessary, based on review of backfill operations during constmction. If utility contractors indicate that it is undesirable to use compaction equipment in close proximity to a buried conduit, the contractor may elect the utilization of light weight mechanical compaction equipment and/or shading of the conduit with clean, granular material, which should be thoroughly jetted in-place above the conduit, prior to initiating mechanical compaction procedures. Other methods of utility trench compaction may also be appropriate, upon review of the geotechnical consultant at the time of construction. In cases where clean granular materials are proposed for use in lieu of native materials or where flooding or jetting is proposed, the procedures should be considered subject to review by the geotechnical consultant. Clean granular backfill and/or bedding are not recommended in slope areas. Section 9 - Drainage Where deemed appropriate by the geotechnical consultant, canyon subdrain systems should be installed in accordance with CTE's recommendations during grading. Typical subdrains for compacted fill buttresses, slope stabilization or sidehill masses, should be installed in accordance with the specifications. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 8 of 26 Appendix D Page D-9 Standard Specifications for Grading Roof, pad and slope drainage should be directed away from slopes and areas of structures to suitable disposal areas via non-erodible devices (i.e., gutters, downspouts, and concrete swales). For drainage in extensively landscaped areas near stmctures, (i.e., within four feet) a minimum of 5 percent gradient away from the structure should be maintained. Pad drainage of at least 2 percent should be maintained over the remainder of the site. Drainage pattems established at the time of fme grading should be maintained throughout the life of the project. Property owners should be made aware that altering drainage pattems could be detrimental to slope stability and foundation performance. Section 10 - Slope Maintenance 10.1 - Landscape Plants To enhance surficial slope stability, slope planting should be accomplished at the completion of grading. Slope planting should consist of deep-rooting vegetation requiring little watering. Plants native to the southem Califomia area and plants relative to native plants are generally desirable. Plants native to other semi-arid and arid areas may also be appropriate. A Landscape Architect should be the best party to consult regarding actual types of plants and planting configuration. 10.2 - Irrigation Irrigation pipes should be anchored to slope faces, not placed in trenches excavated into slope faces. Slope irrigation should be minimized. If automatic timing devices are utilized on irrigation systems, provisions should be made for interrupting normal irrigation during periods of rainfall. 10.3 - Repair As a precautionary measure, plastic sheeting should be readily available, or kept on hand, to protect all slope areas from saturation by periods of heavy or prolonged rainfall. This measure is strongly recommended, beginning with the period prior to landscape planting. If slope failures occur, the geotechnical consultant should be contacted for a field review of site conditions and development of recommendations for evaluation and repair. If slope failures occur as a result of exposure to period of heavy rainfall, the failure areas and currently unaffected areas should be covered with plastic sheeting to protect against additional saturation. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 9 of 26 Appendix D Page D-10 Standard Specifications for Grading In the accompanying Standard Details, appropriate repair procedures are illustrated for superficial slope failures (i.e., occurring typically within the outer one foot to three feet of a slope face). STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF GRADING Page 10 of 26 BENCHING FILL OVER NATURAL 5" MIN 2' MIN SURFACE OF FIRM EARTH MATERIAL FILL SLOPE 4" TYPICAL 2% MIN 10' TYPICAL 15' MIN. (INCLINED 2% MIN. INTO SLOPE) BENCHING FILL OVER CUT SURFACE OF FIRM EARTH MATERIAL FINISH FILL SLOPE FINISH CUT SLOPE :\Ti^ 2% MIN 10' 4" TYPICAL TYPICAL'' 15' MIN OR STABILITY EQUIVALENT PER SOIL ENGINEERING (INCLINED 2% MIN. INTO SLOPE) NOT TO SCALE BENCHING FOR COMPACTED FILL DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 11 of 26 TOE OF SLOPE SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN FILL MINIMUM DOWNSLOPE KEY DEPTH 10' TYPICAL BENCH 4' WIDTH VARIES COMPETENT EARTH MATERIAL TYPICAL BENCH HEIGHT PROVIDE BACKDRAIN AS REQUIRED PER RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOILS ENGINEER DURING GRADING WHERE NATURAL SLOPE GRADIENT IS 5:1 OR LESS, BENCHING IS NOT NECESSARY. FILL IS NOT TO BE PLACED ON COMPRESSIBLE OR UNSUITABLE MATERIAL. NOT TO SCALE FILL SLOPE ABOVE NATURAL GROUND DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 12 of 26 CO > z a > 33 a CO •D 13 m D3 O CD _i o GO > 2.5 N) Z 0) CO -n o 33 Q 33 > • Q REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL, COLLUVIUM, AND CREEP MATERIAL FROM TRANSITION CUT/FILL CONTACT SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN CUT/FILL CONTACT SHOWN ON "AS-BUILT" NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY CUT SLOPE* FILL 2% MIN 15' MINIMUM 4' TYPICAL 10' TYPICAL BEDROCK OR APPROVED FOUNDATION MATERIAL 'NOTE: CUT SLOPE PORTION SHOULD BE MADE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL NOT TO SCALE FILL SLOPE ABOVE CUT SLOPE DETAIL SURFACE OF COMPETENT MATERIAL TYPICAL BENCHING SEE DETAIL BELOW DETAIL REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL INCLINE TOWARD DRAIN AT 2% GRADIENT MINIMUM MINIMUM 9 FT' PER LINEAR FOOT OF APPROVED FILTER MATERIAL MINIMUM 4" DIAMETER APPROVED PERFORATED PIPE (PERFORATIONS DOWN) 6" FILTER MATERIAL BEDDING MINIMUM FILTER MATERIAL TO MEET FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION OR APPROVED EQUAL: APPROVED PIPE TO BE SCHEDULE 40 POLY-VINYL-CHLORIDE (P.V.C.) OR APPROVED EQUAL. MINIMUM CRUSH SIEVE SIZE PERCENTAGE PASSING STRENGTH 1000 psi 1" 100 PIPE DIAMETER TO MEET THE 1" 100 FOLLOWING CRITERIA, SUBJECTTO %" 90-100 FIELD REVIEW BASED ON ACTUAL GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS ya-40-100 ENCOUNTERED DURING GRADING rn. 4 25-40 LENGTH OF RUN PIPE DIAMETER NO. 30 18-33 INITIAL 500' 4" NO.S 5-15 500'TO 1500' 6" NO. 50 0-7 > 1500' 8" NO. 200 0-3 NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 14 of 26 CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAILS TYPICAL BENCHING SURFACE OF COMPETENT MATERIAL SEE DETAILS BELOW REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL INCLINE TOWARD DRAIN AT 2% GRADIENT MINIMUM TRENCH DETAILS 6" MINIMUM OVERLAP OPTIONAL V-DITCH DETAIL MIRAFI 140N FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUAL 24" MINIMUM MINIMUM 9 FP PER LINEAR FOOT OF APPROVED DRAIN MATERIAL MINIMUM 9 FP PER LINEAR FOOT OF APPROVED DRAIN MATERIAL •MIRAFI HON FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUAL APPROVED PIPE TO BE SCHEDULE 40 POLY- VINYLCHLORIDE (P.V.C.) OR APPROVED EQUAL. MINIMUM CRUSH STRENGTH 1000 PSI. 60° TO 90° DRAIN MATERIAL TO MEET FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION OR APPROVED EQUAL: SIEVE SIZE 1X2" 1" 3/4" %" NO. 200 PERCENTAGE PASSING 88-100 5-40 0-17 0-7 0-3 PIPE DIAMETER TO MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, SUBJECT TO FIELD REVIEW BASED ON ACTUAL GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED DURING GRADING LENGTH OF RUN INITIAL 500' 500'TO 1500' > 1500' PIPE DIAMETER 4" 6" 8" NOT TO SCALE GEOFABRIC SUBDRAIN STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 15 of 26 FRONT VIEW CONCRETE CUT-OFF WALL" SUBDRAIN PIPE 24" Min. 6" Min. 6" Min. 6" Min. SIDE VIEW CONCRETE CUT-OFF WALL SOILD SUBDRAIN PIPE 12" Min. 6" Min. 6" Min. PERFORATED SUBDRAIN PIPE' l^lMSlF 3 NOT TO SCALE RECOMMENDED SUBDRAIN CUT-OFF WALL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 16 of 26 FRONT VIEW SUBDRAIN OUTLET PIPE (MINIMUM 4" DIAMETER) 24" Min. SIDE VIEW ALL BACKFILL SHOULD BE COMPACTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. COMPACTION EFFORT SHOULD NOT DAMAGE STRUCTURE NOTE: HEADWALL SHOULD OUTLET AT TOE OF SLOPE OR INTO CONTROLLED SURFACE DRAINAGE DEVICE ALL DISCHARGE SHOULD BE CONTROLLED THIS DETAIL IS A MINIMUM DESIGN AND MAY BE MODIFIED DEPENDING UPON ENCOUNTERED CONDITiONS AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL SUBDRAIN OUTLET HEADWALL DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 17 of 26 15'MINIMUM 4" DIAMETER PERFORATED PIPE BACKDRAIN 4" DIAMETER NON-PERFORATED PIPE LATERAL DRAIN SLOPE PER PLAN FILTER MATERIAL -BENCHING AN ADDITIONAL BACKDRAIN AT MID-SLOPE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR SLOPE IN EXCESS OF 40 FEET HIGH. KEY-DIMENSION PER SOILS ENGINEER (GENEF^LLY 1/2 SLOPE HEIGHT, 15' MINIMUM) DIMENSIONS ARE MINIMUM RECOMMENDED NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL SLOPE STABILIZATION FILL DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 18 of 26 # 15'MINIMUM 4" DIAMETER PERFORATED PIPE BACKDRAIN 4" DIAMETER NON-PERFORATED PIPE LATERAL DRAIN SLOPE PER PLAN FILTER MATERIAL BENCHING ADDITIONAL BACKDRAIN AT MID-SLOPE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR SLOPE IN EXCESS OF 40 FEET HIGH. KEY-DIMENSION PER SOILS ENGINEER DIMENSIONS ARE MINIMUM RECOMMENDED NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL BUTTRESS FILL DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 19 of 26 FINAL LIMIT OF EXCAVATION DAYLIGHT LINE 20' MAXIMUM OVERBURDEN (CREEP-PRONE) TYPICAL BENCHING LOCATION OF BACKDRAIN AND OUTLETS PER SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST DURING GRADING. MINIMUM 2% FLOW GRADIENT TO DISCHARGE LOCATION. EQUIPMENT WIDTH (MINIMUM 15') NOT TO SCALE DAYLIGHT SHEAR KEY DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 20 of 26 NATURAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADING _2_ 1.5. 1.5 COMPACTED FILL "W" BASE WIDTH "W" DETERMINED BY SOILS ENGINEER PROVIDE BACKDRAIN, PER BACKDRAIN DETAIL. AN ADDITIONAL BACKDRAIN AT MID-SLOPE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR BACK SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 40 FEET HIGH. LOCATIONS OF BACKDRAINS AND OUTLETS PER SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST DURING GRADING. MINIMUM 2% FLOW GRADIENT TO DISCHARGE LOCATION. NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL SHEAR KEY DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 21 of 26 FINISH SURFACE SLOPE 3 FT' MINIMUM PER LINEAR FOOT APPROVED FILTER ROCK* CONCRETE COLLAR PLACED NEAT 2.0% MINIMUM A-" 4" MINIMUM DIAMETER SOLID OUTLET PIPE SPACED PER SOIL ENGINEER REQUIREMENTS DURING GRADING TYPICAL BENCHING 4" MINIMUM APPROVED PERFORATED PIPE** (PERFORATIONS DOWN) MINIMUM 2% GRADIENT TO OUTLET BENCH INCLINED TOWARD DRAIN DETAIL A-A TEMPORARY FILL LEVEL MINIMUM 12" COVER DOMPACTEC BACKFILL 12" " MINIMUM MINIMUM 4" DIAMETER APPROVED SOLID OUTLET PIPE "APPROVED PIPE TYPE: SCHEDULE 40 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (P.V.C.) OR APPROVED EQUAL. MINIMUM CRUSH STRENGTH 1000 PSI *FILTER ROCK TO MEET FOLLOWiNG SPECIFICATIONS OR APPROVED EQUAL: SIEVE SIZE 1" %" NO.4 NO. 30 NO. 50 NO. 200 NOT TO SCALE PERCENTAGE PASSING 100 90-100 40-100 25-40 5-15 0-7 0-3 TYPICAL BACKDRAIN DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 22 of 26 FINISH SURFACE SLOPE MINIMUM 3 FT' PER LINEAR FOOT OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE* TAPE AND SEAL AT COVER CONCRETE COLLAR PLACED NEAT MINIMUM 4" DIAMETER SOLID OUTLET PIPE SPACED PER SOIL ENGINEER REQUIREMENTS TYPICAL BENCHING MIRAFI MON FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUAL 4" MINIMUM APPROVED PERFORATED PIPE (PERFORATIONS DOWN) MINIMUM 2% GRADIENT TO OUTLET BENCH INCLINED TOWARD DRAIN DETAIL A-A TEMPORARY FILL LEVEL MINIMUM 12" COVER POMPACTEd BACKFILL 12" •NOTE: AGGREGATE TO MEET FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS OR APPROVED EQUAL: MINIMUM SIEVE SIZE 1/2" 1" %" %" NO. 200 PERCENTAGE PASSING 100 5-40 0-17 0-7 0-3 MINIMUM 4" DIAMETER APPROVED SOLID OUTLET PIPE NOT TO SCALE BACKDRAIN DETAIL (GEOFRABIC) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 23 of 26 SOIL SHALL BE PUSHED OVER ROCKS AND FLOODED INTO VOIDS. COMPACT AROUND AND OVER EACH WINDROW. •EQUIPMENT WIDTH STACK BOULDERS END TO END. / DO NOT PILE UPON EACH OTHER. FILL SLOPE /... ••' \ / / \ COMPETENT MATERIAL >•/ STAGGER ROWS NOT TO SCALE ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 24 of 26 FINISHED GRADE SLOPE FACE 5' MINIMUM OR BELOW DEPTH OF DEEPEST UTILITY TRENCH (WHICHEVER GREATER) BUILDING NO OVERSIZE, AREA FOR FOUNDATION, UTILITIES AND SWIMMING POOLS —o o p •1 WINDROW TYPICAL WINDROW DETAIL (EDGE VIEW) GRANULAR SOIL FLOODED TO FILL VOIDS HORIZONTALLY PLACED COMPACTION FILL X———————————X \i——^ 4 PROFILE VIEW ———V NOT TO SCALE ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 25 of 26 GENERAL GRADING RECOMMENDATIONS CUT LOT 5' TOPSOIL, COLLUVIUM AND WEATHERED BEDROCK UNWEATHERED BEDROCK •ORIGINAL GROUND 5" MIN ^—^ 3' MIN OVEREXCAVATE AND REGRADE CUT/FILL LOT (TRANSITION) COMPACTED FILL UNWEATHERED BEDROCK ORIGINAL •GROUND "S'MIN 3'MIN OVEREXCAVATE AND REGRADE NOT TO SCALE TRANSITION LOT DETAIL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRADING Page 26 of 26 Chicago Title Company 2365 Northside Drive, Suite 500, San Diego, CA 92108 Phone: (619)521-3500 • Fax: Issuing Policies of Chicago Title Insurance Company ORDERNO.: 12202449-996-U50 GS Development / Goertzen Homes Po Box 91336 San Diego, CA 92109 ATTN: Greg Goertzen Email: greggoertzen@hotmail.com Ref: Esfera and Vemado PROPERTY: VENADO STREET, CARLSBAD, CA Escrow/Customer Phone: (619) 521-3500 Title Officer: CyrA'otel (SD/BS) Title Officer Phone: (619) 521-3555 Title Officer Fax: (619) 521-3608 Title Officer Email: Cyr-Votel@ctt.com PRELIMINARY REPORT In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Chicago Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of title insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Chicago Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska Corporation. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the land. Countersigned: Authorized Signature CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) Page 1 • Chicago Title Company 2365 Northside Drive, Suite 500, San Diego, CA 92108 Phone: (619)521-3500 • Fax: PRELIMINARY REPORT SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: September 20, 2013 at 7:30 a.m. The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is: Std. Owner's Policy 1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A FEE 2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: Yuan-Cheng Fung and Luna H. Fung, Trustees of The Y.C. & Luna Fung Trust, dated June 13,1990 3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) Page 2 PRELIMINARY REPORT YOUR REFERENCE: Esfera and Vemado Chicago Title Company ORDERNO.: 12202449-996-U50 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 456 OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20 LA COSTA VALE UNIT NO. 3, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7950. FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL MINERALS, MINERAL RIGHTS, OIL, OIL RIGHTS, NATURAL GAS RIGHTS, PETROLEUM, PETROLEUM RIGHTS, OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES, GEOTHERMAL STEAM, ALL UNDERGROUND WATER, AND ALL PRODUCTS DERIVED FROM ANY OF THE FOREGOING, IN OR UNDER OR WHICH MAY BE PRODUCED FROM THE PROPERTY WHICH UNDERLIES A PLANE PARALLEL TO AND 500 FEET BELOW THE PRESENT SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY TOGETHER WITH THE PERPETUAL RIGHT OF DRILLING, MINING, EXPLORING AND OPERATING THEREFORE, AND STORING IN AND REMOVING THE SAME FROM THE PROPERTY OR ANY OTHER LAND, INCLUDING THE RIGHT OF TO WHIPSTOCK A DIRECTIONALLY DRILL AND MINE FROM LANDS OTHER THAN THE PROPERTY OIL, WATER OR GAS WELLS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS INTO, THROUGH OR ACROSS THE SUBSURFACE OF THE PROPERTY, AND TO BOTTOM SUCH WHIPSTOCKED OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED WELLS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS UNDER AND BENEATH OR BEYOND THE EXTERIOR LIMITS THEREOF, AND TO REDRILL, RETUNNEL, EQUIP, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, DEEPEN, AND OPERATE ANY SUCH WELLS OR MINES, WITHOUT, HOWEVER, THE RIGHT TO DRILL, MINE, STORE, EXPLORE AND OPERATE THROUGH THE SURFACE OR THE UPPER FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET OF THE SUBSURFACE, AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM DAON CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, RECORDED JANUARY 20, 1982 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 82-016443 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN: 223-250-14 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) Page 3 PRELIMINARY REPORT YOUR REFERENCE: Esfera and Vemado Chicago Title Company ORDERNO.: 12202449-996-USO SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS AT THE DATE HEREOF, ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AND EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Property taxes, which are a lien not yet due and payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2013-2014. 2. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (Commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of Califomia. 3. An assessment by the improvement district shown below: Series: District: For: Bond issued: 96-1 San Diego City Olivnhain Water 96-1 October 4, 1996 Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as delineated or as offered for dedication, on the map of said tract/plat; Map 7950 Purpose: Affects: public utility and tree planting as shown on said map Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, source of income, gender, gender identity, gender expression, medical condition or genetic information, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is pennitted by applicable law, as set forth in the document Recording Date: Recording No: December 8, 1976 76-411224 of Official Records Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat the lien of any mortgage or deed of tmst made in good faith and for value. Modification(s) of said covenants, conditions and restrictions Recording Date: Recording No: Febmary 23, 1977 77-064347 of Official Records Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Purpose: Recording Date: Recording No: Affects: improve and replace utilities January 20, 1982 82-016443 of Official Records The exact location and extent of said easement is not disclosed of record Matters contained in that certain document Entitled: Recording Date: Recording No: Notice of Assessment Olivenhain Municipal Water District Reassessment District No. 96-1 July 23, 2007 2007-0492327 of Official Records CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) Page 4 PRELIMINARY REPORT YOUR REFERENCE: Esfera and Vemado Chicago Title Company ORDERNO.: 12202449-996-U50 SCHEDULE B - EXCEPTIONS (Continued) Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. 8. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records. 9. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in possession thereof This office must be notified at least 7 business days prior to the scheduled closing in order to arrange for an inspection of the land; upon completion of this inspection you will be notified of the removal of specific coverage exceptions and/or additional exceptions to coverage. 10. Any rights of parties in possession of said land, based on any unrecorded lease, or leases. This Company will require a full copy of any unrecorded lease, together with all supplements, assignments, and amendments for review. END OF ITEMS CLTA Preliminary Report Fonn - Modified (I I/I7/06) Page 5 PRELIMINARY REPORT YOUR REFERENCE: Esfera and Vemado Chicago Title Company ORDER NO.: 12202449-996-U50 NOTES Note No. 1: Section 12413.1, Califomia Insurance Code became effective January 1, 1990. This legislation regulates the disbursement of funds deposited with any title entity acting in an escrow or sub-escrow capacity. The law requires that all funds be deposited and collected by the title entity's escrow and/or sub-escrow account prior to disbursement of any funds. Some methods of funding may be subject to a holding period, which must expire before any funds may be disbursed. In order to avoid any such delays, all funding should be done via wire transfer. Funds deposited with the Company via wire transfer may be disbursed upon receipt. Funds deposited by cashiers checks, certified checks, and teller's checks is one business day after the day deposited. Other checks may require hold periods fi-om two to five business days after the day deposited, and may delay your closing. The Company may receive benefits fi-om such banks based upon the balances in such accounts. Such benefits will be retained by the Company as part of its compensation for handling such funds. Note No. 2: The charge where an order is cancelled after the issuance of the report of title, will be that amount which in the opinion of the Company is proper compensation for the services rendered or the purpose for which the report is used, but in no event shall said charge be less that the minimum amount required under Section 12404.1 of the Insurance Code of the State of Califomia. If the report caimot be cancelled "no fee" pursuant to the provisions of said Insurance Code, then the minimum cancellation fee shall be that permitted by law. Note No. 3: Califomia Revenue and Taxation Code Section 18668, effective January 1, 1991, requires that the buyer in all sales of Califomia Real Estate, withhold 3-1/3% ofthe total sales price as Califomia State Income Tax, subject to the various provisions of the law as therein contained, and as amended. Note No. 4: Your application for title insurance was placed by reference to a street address or assessor's parcel number. Based upon our records, we believe that the description in this report covers the parcel that you requested. To prevent errors, we require written confirmation that the legal description contained herein covers the parcel that you requested. Note No. 5: The plat, (map), which is attached to this report, is to assist you in locating land with reference to streets and other parcels. While this plat is believed to be correct, the Company assumes no liability for any loss occurring by reason of reliance thereon. Note No. 6: The policy of title insurance will include an arbitration provision. The Company or the insured may demand arbitration. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or other obligation. Please ask your escrow or title officer for a sample copy ofthe policy to be issued if you wish to review the arbitration provisions and any other provisions pertaining to your Title Insurance coverage. Note No. 7: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than the amount, if any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Note No. 8: Acceptance of the offer to insure provided for in this preliminary report constitutes the proposed insured's agreement that the sole and only liability of the company (and the title insurer) related to their actions in recording the documents provided to it for the closing of the contemplated transaction and the disbursing of funds acting in the function of a subescrow shall be that contained in the policy of title insurance that is to be issued by the company. The proposed insured understands and agrees that neither the underwritten company nor the title insurance company can guarantee or represent the condition or status of title or any physical condition existant with respect to real property. It is understood that no writing or instmction inconsistent with this understanding will have any force or effect or impose any liability against the underwritten company or the title insure in the contemplated transaction. CLTA Preliminary Report Fomi - Modified (11/17/06) Page 6 PRELIMINARY REPORT YOUR REFERENCE: Esfera and Vemado Chicago Title Company ORDERNO.: 12202449-996-U50 NOTES (Continued) WIRE INSTRUCTIONS When fiinds are wired to Chicago Title Company, please use the instmctions below: Union Bank 1980 Saturn St. Monterey Park, CA 91756 ABA (Routing) Number: 122000496 Account No.: 0010425492 Account Name: Chicago Title Company Please credit Chicago Title Company and reference our Order No. 12202449-996-U50 to avoid retum of funds. Funds received by Chicago Title Company via wire transfer may be disbursed upon receipt. Funds received by this company via cashier's check or tellers check may be disbursed on the next business day after the day of deposit. If escrow funds (including shortage checks) are disbursed to this company other than by wire transfer, cashier's check or teller's check, disbursement and/or closing will be delayed 3 to 7 business days. Questions conceming deposit and/or disbursement of escrow and sub-escrow funds and recording should be directed to your title officer, escrow officer or loan payoff officer. Outgoing wire transfers will not be authorized until we have confirmation of our recording and one (1) of the following: A we have received confirmation of the respective incoming wire. B. Collection of a deposited check. PAYOFF INFORMATION NOTE: This company DOES require current beneficiary demands prior to closing. If the demand is expired and a current demand caimot be obtained, our requirements will be as follows: If this Company accepts a verbal update on the demand, we may hold an amount equal to one monthly mortgage payment. This hold will be over and above the verbal hold the lender may have stipulated. If this Company cannot obtain a verbal update on the demand, we will either pay off of the expired demand, or wait for the amended demand, at the discretion of the escrow. NOTE: to avoid delays at the time of closing, if the above deed of trust is an Equity Line/Line of Credit, it will be necessary that all checks, passbooks, credit cards together with instructions to close the account be submitted to the Company prior to the close of tWs transaction. In order to expedite compliance with the above, please do the following: Borrower (s): a) b) Settlement: a) b) Sign and return the Equity Line/Credit Line Affidavit provided with the report, Request that the account be frozen. Obtain a statement from the lender that no advances have been made after the issuance of the demand for payoff, and Upon delivery of the payoff check, a full reconveyance must be obtained. Please be advised that the difference between the principal balance on an issued demand and the maximum principal allowed may be held for up to 10 working days if the above requirements are not met. END OF NOTES Cyr/Votel (SD/BS)/gp CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) Page 8 PRELIMINARY REPORT YOUR REFERENCE: Esfera and Vemado Chicago Title Company ORDERNO.: 12202449-996-U50 NOTES (Continued) Note No. 9: The Company will require either (a) a complete copy of the tmst agreement and any amendments thereto certified by the tmstee(s) to be a tme and complete copy with respect to the hereinafter named tmst, or (b) a Certification, pursuant to Califomia Probate Code Section 18100.5, executed by all ofthe current tmstee(s) of the hereinafter named trust, a form of which is attached. Name of Trast: Yuan-Cheng Fung and Luna H. Fung, Trustees of The Y.C. & Luna Fung Trust, dated June 13,1990 Note No. 10: Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, are paid. For proration purposes the amounts were: Tax Identification No.: 223-250-14-00 Fiscal Year: 2012-2013 1st Installment: $820.06 2nd Installment: $820.06 Exemption: None Code Area: 09045 CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06) Page 7 Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Privacy Statement Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("FNF") respect the privacy and security of your non-public personal information ("Personal Information") and protecting your Personal Information is one of our top priorities. This Privacy Statement explains FNF's privacy practices, including how we use the Personal Information we receive from you and fi-om other specified sources, and to whom it may be disclosed. FNF follows the privacy practices described in this Privacy Statement and, depending on the business performed, FNF companies may share information as described herein. Personal Information Collected We may collect Personal Information about you fi-om the following sources: • Information we receive from you on applications or other forms, such as your name, address, social security number, tax identification number, asset information, and income information; • Information we receive from you through our Intemet websites, such as your name, address, email address, Intemet Protocol address, the website links you used to get to our websites, and your activity while using or reviewing our websites; • Information about your transactions with or services performed by us, our affiliates, or others, such as information conceming your policy, premiums, payment history, information about your home or other real property, information from lenders and other third parties involved in such transaction, account balances, and credit card information; and • Information we receive fi-om consumer or other reporting agencies and publicly recorded documents. Disclosure of Personal Information We may provide your Personal Information (excluding information we receive trom consumer or other credit reporting agencies) to various individuals arid companies, as permitted by law, without obtaining your prior authorization. Such laws do not allow consumers to restrict these disclosures. Disclosures may include, without limitation, the following: To insurance agents, brokers, representatives, support organizations, or others to provide you with services you have requested, and to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure in connection with an insurance transaction; To third-party contractors or service providers for the purpose of determining your eligibility for an insurance benefit or payment and/or providing you with services you have requested; To an insurance regulatory authority, or a law enforcement or other govemmental authority, in a civil action, in connection with a subpoena or a governmental investigation; To companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or to other financial institutions with which we have joint marketing agreements and/or To lenders, lien holders, judgment creditors, or other parties claiming an encumbrance or an interest in title whose claim or interest must be determined, settled, paid or released prior to a title or escrow closing. We may also disclose your Personal Information to others when we believe, in good faith, that such disclosure is reasonably necessary to comply with the law or to protect the safety of our customers, employees, or property and/or to comply with a judicial proceeding, court order or legal process. Disclosure to Affiliated Companies - We are permitted by law to share your name, address and facts about your transaction with other FNF companies, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate service providers to provide you with services you have requested, for marketing or product development research, or to market products or services to you. We do not, however, disclose information we collect from consumer or credit reporting agencies with our affiliates or others without your consent, in conformity with applicable law, unless such disclosure is otherwise pennitted by law. Disclosure to Nonaffiliated Third Parties - We do not disclose Personal Information about our customers or former customers to nonaffiliated third parties, except as outlined herein or as otherwise permitted by law. Confidentiality and Security of Personal Information We restrict access to Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard Personal Infonnation. Access to Personal Information/Requests for Correction, Amendment, or Deletion of Personal Information As required by applicable law, we will afford you the right to access your Personal Information, under certain circumstances to find out to whom your Personal Information has been disclosed, and request correction or deletion of your Personal Information. However, FNF's cunent policv is to maintain customers' Personal Information for no less than vour state's required record retention requirements for the purpose of handling future coverage claims. For your protection, all requests made under this section must be in writing and must include vour notarized signature to establish vour identitv. Where permitted by law, we may charge a reasonable fee to cover the costs incuned in responding to such requests. Please send requests to: Chief Privacy Officer Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32204 Changes to this Privacy Statement This Privacy Statement may be amended fi-om time to time consistent with applicable privacy laws. When we amend this Privacy Statement, we will post a notice of such changes on our website. The effective date of this Privacy Statement, as stated above, indicates the last time this Privacy Statement was revised or materially changed. Privacy Policy Effective Date: 5/1/2008 Notice of Available Discounts Pursuant to Section 2355.3 in Title 10 of the Califomia Code of Regulations Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("FNF") must deliver a notice of each discount available under our current rate filing along with the delivery of escrow instmctions, a preliminary report or commitment. Please be aware that the provision of this notice does not constitute a waiver of the consumer's right to be charged the field rate. As such, your transaction may not qualify for the below discounts. You are encouraged to discuss the applicability of one or more of the below discounts with a Company representative. These discounts are generally described below; consult the rate manual for a full description of the terms, conditions and requirements for each discount. These discounts only apply to transaction involving services rendered by the FNF Family of Companies. This notice only applies to transactions involving property improved with a one-to-four family residential dwelling. FNF Underwritten Title Companv FNF Underwriter CTC - Chicago Title Company CTIC - Chicago Title Insurance Company AvaUable Discounts CREDIT FOR PRELIMINARY REPORTS AND/OR COMMITMENTS ON SUBSEQUENT POLICIES (CTIC) Where no major change in the title has occurred since the issuance of the original report or commitment, the order may be reopened within 12 months and all or a portion of the charge previously paid for the report or commitment may be credited on a subsequent policy charge within the following time period fi'om the date of the report. FEE REEDUCTION SETTLEMENT PROGRAM (CTC and CTIC) Eligible customers shall receive $20.00 reduction in their title and/or escrow fees charged by the Company for each eligible transaction in accordance with the terms of the Final Judgments entered in The People of the State of Califomia. DISASTER LOANS (CTIC) The charge for a lender's Policy (Standard or Extended coverage) covering the financing or refinancing by an owner of record, -within 24 months of the date of a declaration of a disaster area by the govemment of the United States or the State of Califomia on any land located in said area, which was partially or totally destroyed in the disaster, will be 50% of the appropriate title insurance rate. CHURCHES OR CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS (CTIC) On properties used as a church or for charitable purposes within the scope of the normal activities of such entities, provided said charge is normally the church's obligation the charge for an owner's policy shall be 50% to 70% of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. The charge for a lender's policy shall be 40% to 50% of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. EMPLOYEE RATE (CTC and CTIC) No charge shall be made to employees (including employees on approved retirement) of the Company or its underwritten, subsidiary title companies for policies or escrow services in connection with financing, refinancing, sale or purchase of the employees' bona fide home property. Waiver of such charges is authorized only in coimection with those costs which the employee would be obligated to pay, by established custom, as a party to the transaction. CA Discount Notice Effecfive Date: 1-10-2010 Notice You may be entitled to receive a $20.00 discount on escrow services if you purchased, sold or refinanced residential property in Califomia between May 19,1995 and November 1, 2002. If you had more than one qualifying transaction, you may be entitled to multiple discounts. If your previous transaction involved the same property that is the subject of your current transaction, you do not have to do anything; the Company will provide the discount, provided you are paying for escrow or title services in this transaction. If your previous transaction involved property different from the property that is the subject of your current transaction, you must inform the Company of the earlier transaction, provide the address of the property involved in the previous transaction, and the date or approximate date that the escrow closed to be eligible for the discount. Unless you inform the Company of the prior transaction on property that is not the subject of this transaction, the Company has no obligation to conduct an investigation to determine if you qualify for a discount. If you provided the Company information conceming a prior transaction, the Company is required to determine if you qualify for a discount. Effective through November 1, 2014 PRELIMINARY REPORT YOUR REFERENCE: Esfera and Vei Chicago Title Company ORDERNO.: 12202449-996-U50 Request for $20.00 Discount - CA Settlement Use one form for each qualifying property. To: Chicago Title Company, 2365 Northside Drive500 Date: From: (name) Current Address: I believe that I am qualified for the $20.00 discount pursuant to the coordinated stipulated judgments entered in actions filed by both the Attomey General and private class action plaintiffs. I have not previously received a cash payment or a discount fi-om another Company on the property described below: Signed: Date: Address of qualifying property: Approximate date of transaction THIS SECTION IS FOR COMPANY USE ONLY • The above referenced party is entitled to receive a $20.00 discount on escrow services or title insurance pursuant to the coordinated stipulated judgments entered in actions filed by both the Attomey General and private class action plaintiffs. OR • The above referenced party does NOT qualify for the $20.00 discount pursuant to the coordinated stipulated judgments entered in actions filed by both the Attomey General and private class action plaintiffs for the following reason: • • The party has previously received credit for the transaction described above. The transaction described above did not occur in the time period allowed by the stipulated judgments—May 19, 1995 to November 1, 2002. Fax this response to: Escrow No.: 12202449-996-U50 Escrow Officer: Fax Number: ATTACHMENT ONE AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Govemmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or govemment regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulafions conceming: • land use • improvements on the land • land division • environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless: • a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the Policy Date In addition to the Exclusions, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and the expenses resulting from: 1. Any rights, interests, or claims of parties in possession of the land not shown by the public records. 2. Any easements or liens not shown by the public records. This does not limit the lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks. • the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking. 3. Title Risi<s: • that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you • that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date—unless they appeared in the public records • that result in no loss to you • that first affect your title after the Policy Date—this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your title. 5. Lack of a right: • to any land outside the area specifically described and refened to in Item 3 of Schedule A OR • in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks 3. Any facts about the land which a conect survey would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. This does not limit the forced removal coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks. 4. Any water rights or claims or titie to water in or under the land, whether or not shown by the public records. Attachment One (07/26/10) ATTACHMENT ONE (Continued) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1990 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or exf)enses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or govemmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, (b) Any govemmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date ofPolicy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occuned prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: 5. (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date ofPolicy); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or tmth in lending law. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. SCHEDULE B, PART I EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: PARTI 3. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a conect survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material not shown by the Public Records. Attachment One (07/26/10) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) FORMERLY AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10-17-92) WITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT-FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or govemmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, (b) Any govemmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date ofPolicy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding fi-om coverage any taking which has occuned prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the 7. priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or tmth in lending law. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine or equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions fi-om Coverage, the Exceptions fi-om Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 2. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the public records. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a conect survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance Attachment One (07/26/10) thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material not not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by shown by the Public Records, the public records. M ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) 2006 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded fi-om the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or govemmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or govemmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (fa) Any govemmental police power. This Exclusion 1 (b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13 or 14); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by govemmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b). The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions fi-om Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of 2. 3. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing 4. liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or 5. not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons 6. in possession of the Land. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Titie that would be disclosed by, an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records, (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material not shown by the Public Records. Attachment One (07/26/10) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) FORMERLY AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10-17-92) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE (b) (c) (d) (e) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage 3. of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or govemmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement 4. thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date ofPolicy. (b) Any govemmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occuned prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. The above policy form may be issued to affbrd either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions fi-om Coverage in a Standard Coverage Policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; attaching or created subsequent to Date ofPolicy; or resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. (i) (ii) This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company of 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a conect survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material not shown by the Public Records. Attachment One (07/26/10) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) 2006 AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or govemmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or govemmental regulations. This Exclusion 1 (a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any govemmental police power. This Exclusion 1 (b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by govemmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown in the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and that are not shown by the Public Records, (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor or material not shown by the Public Records. Attachment One (07/26/10) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03) ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Govemmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or govemment regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and regulations conceming: a. building b. zoning c. Land use d. improvements on Land e. land division {. environmental protection This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14, 15,16,17 or 24. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constmcted in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless: a. notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date; or the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they appear in the Public Records. b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date—this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d., 22, 23, 24 or 25. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any Land outside the area specifically described and refened to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 18. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows: • For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16, and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Our Maximum Dollar Your Deductible Amount Limit of Liabilify Covered Risk 14: 1% of Policy Amount $10,000.00 or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 15: Covered Risk 16: Covered Risk 18: 1 % of Policy Amount or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) 1 % ofPolicy Amount or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) 1 % of Policy Amount or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $5,000.00 Attachment One (07/26/10) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (02-03-10) ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (02-03-10) EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attomeys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Govemmental police power, and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or govemment regulation conceming: a. building; b. zoning; c. land use; d. improvements on the Land; e. land division; and f environmental protection. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 23 or 27 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date—this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.e., 25, 26, 27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right; a. to any land outside the area specifically described and refened to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21. 7. The h-ansfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows: • For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19, and 21 Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liabilify Your Deductible Amount Covered Risk 16: 1 % of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A $ 10,000.00 or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 18: 1 % of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A $25,000.00 or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 19: 1% ofPolicy Amount Shown in Schedule A $25,000.00 or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 21: 1% of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A $5,000.00 or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) Attachment One (07/26/10) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTL\L LOAN POLICY (10/13/01) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded fi-om the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvements now or hereafter erected on the Land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or areas of the Land or any parcel of which the Land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or govemmental regulations, except to the extent that notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14 and 16 of this policy, (b) Any govemmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public Records a Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occuned prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (this paragraph does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 8, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceabilify of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inabilify or failure of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the inabilify or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceabilify of the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, except as provided in Covered Risk 27, or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Real properfy taxes or assessments of any govemmental authorify which become a lien on the Land subsequent to date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 7, 8(e) and 26. 7. Any claim of invalidify, unenforceabilify or lack of priorify of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to advances or modifications made after the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8. 8. Lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to each and every advance made after Date of Policy, and all interest charged thereon, over liens, encumbrances and other matters affecting the title, the existence of which are Known to the Insured at: (a) The time of the advance; or (b) The time a modification is made to the terms of the Insured Mortgage which changes the rate of interest charged, if the rate of interest is greater as a result of the modification than it would have been before the modification. This exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8. 9. The failure of the residential stmcture, or any portion thereof to have been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at Date ofPolicy. Attachment One (07/26/10) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTL\L LOAN POLICY (07/26/10) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded fi-om the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or govemmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or govemmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 6, 13(c), 13(d), 14 or 16. (b) Any govemmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5, 6, 13(c), 13(d), Mor 16. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11,16, 17,18, 19, 20,21,22, 23, 24,27 or 28); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceabilify of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inabilify or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing- business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidify or unenforceabilify in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 26. 6. Any claim of invalidify, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to Advances or modifications made after the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by govemmental authority and created or attaching subsequent to Date ofPolicy. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11(b) or 25. 8. The failure ofthe residential structure, or any portion of it, to have been constructed before, on or after Date ofPolicy in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 5 or 6. 9. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 27(b) of this policy. Attachment One (07/26/10) TitleReport-VenadoSlreet,Carlsbad,CA p t3 0. tg O n o •. o I IT'S tt a • tt o H s •d to a n rr I ip a tt IP "9 223-25 i I". IOO' 1^ CHANGES •u OlD|NIW r KCVT 1 ESFERA MAP 7950 • CARLSBAO TRACT NO 7^-20 INtT NO :> - LOTS m3-M2l. H7fl-M8M City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1402401-4 01/24/2014 98 Fri, Jan 24, 2014 01:40 PM Receipt Ref Nbr; Rl402401-4/0005 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 140240104 0006 0005 Trans/Rcpt#; R0099465 SET #: HMP14001 Amount: 1 @ $544.00 Item Subtotal: $544.00 Item Total: $544.00 1 !rEM(S) TOTAL; $544.00 .heck (Chk# 008251) $544.00 Total Received; $544.00 Have a nice day! **************CUSTGMER COPY************* city of Carlsbad 163 5 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 II Applicant: GOERTZEN GREG Description HMP14 001 7481 ESFERA ST CBAD Amount 544.00 Receipt Number: R0099466 Transaction Date: 01/24/2014 Transaction ID: R0099466 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 8251 544.00 Transaction Amount: 544.00 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1402401-4 01/24/2014 98 Fri, Jan 24, 2014 01:40 PM Receipt Ref Nbr: Rl402401-4/0007 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr; 140240104 0007 0007 Trans/Rcpt#; R0099457 SET #: HDP14001 Amount: 1 @ $2,476.00 Item Subtotal; $2,476.00 Item Total: $2,476.00 1 ITEM(S) TOTAL: $2,476.00 '^heck (Chk# 008252) $2,476.00 ioidl Received: $2,475,00 Have a nice day! **************CUSTOMER COPY************* City of Carlsbad 163 5 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA llilllllllllllllllllllllll 92008 Applicant: GOERTZEN GREG Description HDP14001 74 81 ESFERA ST CBAD Amount 2,476.00 Receipt Number: R0099467 Transaction Date: 01/24/2014 Transaction ID: R0099467 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 8252 2,476.00 Transaction Amount: 2,476.00 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1329401-1 10/21/2013 149 Mon, Oct 21, 2013 10:52 AM Receipt Ref Nbr: Rl329401-1/0028 PERMITS - PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 132940101 0028 0029 Trans/Rcpt#; R0097586 SET #: MS130008 Amount: 1 @ $3,847.90 Item Subtotal: $3,847.90 Item Total: $3,847.90 1 ITEM(S) TOTAL: $3,847.90 Check (Chk# 008152) $3,847.90 Total Received: $3,847.90 Have a nice day! **************CUST0MER COPY************* city of Carlsbad 163 5 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA lllll 92008 Applicant: GS DEVELOPMENT CORP, Description MS130008 Amount 3,847.90 Receipt Number: R0097686 Transaction Date: 10/21/2013 Transaction ID: R0097686 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 3,847.90 Transaction Amount: 3,847.90 State of California—Natural Resources Agency f^SA JF ^ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE wliy Qf Caflsharl 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT JUN 11 2014 SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE. TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY Community &Ecof?Qm/c Dcv'siopnfeiifo^artmem RECEIPT* SD2014 0361 STATE CLEARING HOUSE #(lfapplicable) LEADAGENCY CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION DATE 05/05/2014 COUNTY/STATEAGENCYOF FlUNG SAN DIEGO DOCUMENTNUMBER *20140361* PROJECTTITLE MS 13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01 TIERRA LA COSTA PROJECTAPPLICANT NAME PHONENUMBER GS DEVELOPMENT GORP-GREG GOERTZEN 858-449-8419 PROJECTAPPLICANT ADDRESS CTTY STATE ZIPCODE PO BOX 91335 SAN DIEGO CA 92169 PROJECT APPLICANT (Check appropriate box): Q Local Public Agency Q School District • other Special District Q State Agency S Private Entity CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: Q Environmental Impact Report (EIR) • Negative Declaration (ND)(MND) Q Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) Q Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs (CRP) El County Administrative Fee O Project that is exempt from fees H Notice of Exemption • CDFW No Effect Determination (Form Attached) • Other PAYIVIENT METHOD: • Cash • Credit El Check • Other OHK: 8352 $3,029.75 $ $2,181.25 $ $850.00 $ , $1,030.25 $ $50.00 $ , $50.00 TOTALRECEIVED $ $50.00 SIGNATURE K C. Duenas Tmi Deputy lllll ORIGINAL - PROJECT APPLICANT COPY - CDFW/ASB COPY-LEADAGENCY COPY - COUNTY CLERK FG763,5a (Rev 11/12) NOTICE OF EXEMPTION I I? D DL [1 © To: SD County Clerk From: CITYOFCARLSBAD KmeaJ Dronenburg. Jr. Recorder County Clerk Attn: James Scott Planning Division 1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260 1635 Faraday Avenue MAY 05 Z014 PO Box 121750 Carlsbad, CA 92008 OR San Diego, CA 92101 (760) 602-4600 BVLLC—^ ^^SRjft^ Subject: Filing of this Notice of Exemption is in compliance with Section 21152b of the Public Resources Code (California Environmental Quality Act). Project Number and Title: MS 13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01 - Tierra La Costa Project Location - Specific: The north east corner of Esfera Street and Venado Street Project Location - City: Carlsbad Project Location - County: San Diego Description of Project: The subdivision of an existing 1.02 acre parcel into two parcels approximately one-half acre in lot area each. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Citv of Carlsbad Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: Citv of Carlsbad Name of Applicant: GS Development Corp - Greg Goertzen Applicant's Address: PO BOX 91335. San Diego, CA 92169 Applicant's Telephone Number: 858-449-8419 Exempt Status: (Check One) • Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); 15268); • Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); • Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); 15269 (b)(c)); ^ Categorical Exemption - State type and section number: Minor Land Divisions - State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 and In-Fill Development Projects - State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 • Statutory Exemptions - State code number: • General rule (Section 15061(b)(3)) Reasons why project is exempt: The proiect consists of the division of four or fewer parcels in an urbanized area zoned for residential and does not have an average slope over 20%. Furthermore, the proiect site is not more than 5 acres and consistent with the general plan and zoning. Lead Agency Contact Person: Chris Garcia Telephone: 760-602-4622 DON NEU, City Planner Date Date received for filing at OPR: MAY 0 5 20U MAY 0 5 2014 JUN 0 5 2014 JUN 0 5 2014 C Duefias W. Revised 05/13 E^est J. Dronenburg, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 103 San Diego, CA 92101-2480 Tel. (619) 236-3771 * Fax (619) 557-4056 www.sdarcccom RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE 1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260 P.O.Box 121750* San Diego, CA 92112-1750 Tel. (619)237-0502 * Fax (619)557-4155 Transaction #: 318088020140505 Deputy: CDUENAS Location: COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 05-May-2014 16:43 City of Carlsbac MAY 0 8 Z014 Planning Division FEES: 50.00 Qty ofl Fee Notice ofExemption for RefW 2014 0361 50.00 TOTAL DUE PAYMENTS: 50.00 Check 50.00 TENDERED SERVICES AVAILABLE AT OFFICE LOCATIONS * Tax Bill Address Changes * Records and Certified Copies: Birth/ Marriage/ Death/ Real Estate * Fictitious Business Names (DBAs) * Marriage Licenses and Ceremonies * Assessor Parcel Maps * Property Ownership * Property Records * Property Values * Document Recordings SERVICES AVAILABLE ON-LINE AT www.sdarcccom * Forms and Applications * Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) * Grantor/ Grantee Index * Fictitious Business Names Index (DBAs) * Property Sales * On-Line Purchases Assessor Parcel Maps Property Characteristics Recorded Documents 0^ CITY OF ^CARLSBAD —Gommunity & Economic Development a FILE www.carlsbadca.gov NOTICE OF AN INFORMAL HEARING SCHEDULED FOR A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP. MINOR HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND MINOR HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN PERMIT A Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Hillside Development Permit, and Minor Habitat Management Plan Permit have been applied for to allow a two lot subdivision on property generally located at the north east corner of Esfera Street and Venado Street, Carlsbad, California, and more particularly described as: Lot 456 of Carlsbad Tract No. 72-20 La Costa Vale Unit No. 3, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 7950, filed in the office of the county recorder of San Diego County June 3,1974. This project proposes to subdivide an existing, vacant 1.02 acre parcel into two lots approximately one-half acre in lot area each. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map and associated permits are subject to the approval bythe City Planner. Pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Title 20, Section 20.24.115 Minor Subdivisions "Notices", an informal hearing shall take place if a request for an informal hearing was submitted. A request for an "administrative hearing was submitted within 10 calendar days after the Notice of Request for a Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Hillside Development Permit and Minor Habitat Management Plan Permit were mailed out. This notice is hereby given to inform the requestor(s) and the applicant of the informal hearing date, time and location as noted below. Please contact Chris Garcia at 760-602-4622 or email Chris.Garcia@carlsbadca.gov if you have any questions. INFORMAL HEARING SCHEDULE HEARING DATE: Monday, March 24, 2014 HEARING TIME: 4:00pm - 5:00pm HEARING LOCATION: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Room 173A, Carlsbad, CA 92008 CASE NO.: MS 13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01 CASE NAME: TIERRA LA COSTA DATE NOTICE MAILED: March 17, 2014 CITY QF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION Planning Division 163S Faradav Avp. rarkhad. CA 97008 I 760-602-4600 760-602-8558 fax Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge™ AVERY® 5160® I DAVID & DEBIgaRK 3 322_3ZEN?dXr'ST CARLSBAD, CA 92 009-784 9 •FRED & SHI1^4E¥-T3ANIEL 3332 3iEa«CS0 ST CARCSBAD, CA 92009-7849 LEE A & Di;^Jp?WOOD 3336 VEN^BOST CARLSBAD, CA 9200 9-784 9 RAMESH C & SUpE^^^ JAIN 3342 VENApe''^ CARLSBA^TcA 92009-7849 MCCREADY 3352 VEN^D©-^T CARLSBADT CA 92009-7849 ROBERT J PARADOWSKI 3329 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 MARC A DUXBURY 3 327 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 MARBREY 3325 PI^ftCSUA ST CARLSB^, CA 92009-7842 SPRAGUE 3323^IKSGUA ST CARfSBAD, CA 92009-7842 HAROLD L & VIJ^IAN GANO 3321 PIR^fl«?CsT CARLSBJ^T CA 92009-7842 MICHAEL D & MICHELLE SENGER 3319 PIRAGU2 CARLSBAErT^ 92009-7842 MAXWELL S & LIJJBA COLON 3317 PIRAGIWf^ CARLSSAETTCA 92009-7842 ABOLGHASEMJSeROUDI 3315 PJR^cdllA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 DALE W & CHA lOfffiALL 3313 PIRAG^a^'gr CARLSBAB^CA 92009-7842 RICHARD & CLATOift BARBOUR 3311 PIRAGUA-^ CARLSBAETTCA 92009-7842 DAVID J & Aim^^INTZ 3314 PIRAPI»CST CARL5S?d5T^ CA 92009-7841 FORD 3318 PI^ASTJA ST Ci^tS^AD, CA 92009-7841 ANDREW & LORI^IENCINSKY 3320 PIRA^tK^T CARLSBJa?; CA 92009-7841 DAVID A & KIM^RLY CLARKIN 3322 PIR^fi3E3?CST C^JifiSfiAD, CA 92009-7841 RONALD J & RO^I?I ISRAEL 3324 PIRAC3I»CST CARLSB?£l5; CA 92009-7841 RONALD Sc JUpy BOLTON 3326 PI^ASfJA ST CARtS^M, CA 92009-7841 ROY WISE 3 328,..J>«?AGUA ST RLSBAD, CA 92009-7841 MARK & CANDACE WE] 7461 ESFERA ST CARLSBADj^-e?C^ 2 0 0 9 - 7 8 2 4 FARIBA & NAJ3BSIJ SALEHI 7451 E^PeltA ST CARiiS^AD, CA 92009-7824 RICHARD & VALERIE„^RLESS 743 6 TRIGO CARiSBAirr^A 92009-7845 JAMES A & KIRSTEN RECCE 7442 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7845 SHEERMAN 7446 TRiper^N CARLSBM^r CA 92009-7845 DAVID MAS 7452 T^IGCTLN CARESBAD, CA 92009-7845 THOMAS CHYNCES,--^ 74 56 TRIGO^W"'^ CARLSBAJX^A 92009-7845 SIMS 74 62 TRIGO, CARLSBSDTCA 92009-7845 Etiquettes faciles d peler Utilisez le aabarit AVERY® 5160® Sens de -I Repliez k la hadiure afin de | r^v^ler le rebord POD-UD™ ! vwww.avery.com LRnn-nn-AVFRv A notice hasbeen fnH&eAjo aaSSlperty owners/occupants OF * * nFILE ^ CARLSBAD i^i i^-^ Community & Economic Development www.carisbadca.gov NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN PERMIT Notice is hereby given that a Tentative Parcel Map, Hillside Development Permit, and Habitat Management Plan Permit have been applied for to allow a two lot subdivision on property generally located at the north east corner of Esfera Street and Venado Street, Carlsbad, California, and more particularly described as: Lot 456 of Carlsbad Tract No. 72-20 La Costa Vale Unit No. 3, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 7950, filed in the office of the county recorder of San Diego County June 3,1974. This project proposes to subdivide an existing, vacant 1.02 acre parcel into two lots approximately one-half acre in lot area each. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map and associated permits are subject to the approval by the City Planner. If you have any objections to the granting of this tentative parcel map or wish to have an administrative hearing to discuss the requested tentative parcel map, please notify the Planning Division, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008, in writing within 10 days of the date of this notice. If you have any questions, please call Chris Garcia in the Planning Division at 760-602-4622 or by email at Chris.Garcia(S)ca rlsbadca.gov. CASE NO.: MS 13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01 CASE NAME: TIERRA LA COSTA DATE: February 4, 2014 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION Planning Division "^-^ 1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-4600 I 760-602-8558 fax Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge™ AVERY® 5160® I HSBC BANK USA NA SERIES 200 7- PO BOX 2301 BUFFALO, NY 14224 FRANK N & ERI BALES 4413 BANFF ST ANNANDALE, VA 22003-4512 LOUIS W & TRACY ROSGEN 13310 COLCHESTER FERRY PL WOODBRIDGE, VA 22191-1241 DAVID L TREPANIER PO BOX 28315 PANAMA CITY, FL 32411-8315 MICHAEL C COWEN *B* 106 MAX HURT DR MURRAY, KY 42071-7847 SUNG-TAO KO 42 BAYBROOK LN HINSDALE, IL 60523-1638 ROBERT & ANNE PARIS PO BOX 22173 PHOENIX, AZ 85028-0173 JEFFREY COHEN 201 E ANGELENO AVE 309 BURBANK, CA 91502-2955 ADAM & DASA GUZIK 1374 WINDSOR RD CARDIFF, CA 92007-1347 MAUREEN E TAYLOR 3570 DONNA DR CARLSBAD, CA 92008-2761 2012 THOMSON 3110 DORADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009 R M 7668 EL CAMINO REAL 104-4 CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7932 HUDSON 1997 2 616 LA GOLONDRINA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4322 JULIE A JOHANSEN 7597 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7704 MARIA J CEFARATT 7595 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7704 PATRICIA J KNUDSEN 75 93 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7704 ROBERT L & LENORE MCKINN 7591 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7704 •M* STEVEN P ROTENBERG 758 7 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7704 LESLIE J Sc DEBRA ARMSTRONG 7583 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7704 MIGUEL A MATA 7581 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7704 CORONA 7579 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7704 JACK SMYER 7577 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7704 LINDA C SWENSON 7580 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7703 JON M & DANA CAMPBELL 7582 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7703 MICHAEL A ROSS 7584 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7703 LARRY A Sc JENNIFER MULLINS 7586 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7703 GARY & MICHELLE MCCLELLAN 7588 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7703 RANDALL K PATRYLA 75 92 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7703 ELIZABETH J MACKINNON 7594 DEHESA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7703 ERIC J Sc MEGAN KNUTSEN 3342 CUESTA PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7715 Etiquettes faciles ^ peler Utilisez le aabarit AVERY® 5160® A Sens de Repliez h la hadiure afin de | reveler le rebord POD-UD™ \ www.avery.com i.Rnn.(;n.A\/PRV Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Paper Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge™ AVERY® 5160® CAROLINE BAKER 3344 CUESTA PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7715 CINDY A SHAMSHOIAN 3346 CUESTA PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7715 ARTURO MANCILLA 3347 CUESTA PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7715 FRANK & J PISKOR 3345 CUESTA PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7715 IDA M HORD *M* 3343 CUESTA PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7715 JOHN & AURA CARUTHERS 3341 CUESTA PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7715 JOHN PICURI 333 9 CUESTA PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7715 KATHERINE E DOMINICK 3337 CUESTA PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7715 BRETT R & CHANDANI MCINTIRE 3335 CUESTA PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7715 GENE ROMAN 3343 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 RYAN S Sc KATRINA CLYNCH 3337 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 VIRGINIA D DENT 3333 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 HOSSEIN AJEDEH 33 31 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 EVELYN E HAKANSON 3329 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 MARY E MOORE 3325 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 ALBERT G EDWARDS 3323 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 WAYNE E & CHERYL PAGES 3319 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 WHITTINGTON 3317 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 CHRISTA B CASAREZ 3315 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 TERRILL L FLANAGAN 3313 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 PHILIP J REMINGTON 3311 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 CHRISTOPHER LENA 33 07 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 BOLANDPARKE COMMUNITY PROPERS 33 05 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 ARSLANIAN 33 03 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7713 MICHAEL A & RAMONA BERRIER 3342 VIVIENDA CIR 70 CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7712 YEN LY 334 0 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7712 HEATHER H SHELDON 33 38 VIVIENDA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7712 JEFF ADAMOFF 32 02 CARVALLO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7702 CATHERINE NERENBERG 3204 CARVALLO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7702 HANCOCK 3206 CARVALLO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7702 Etiquettes faciles h peler Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160® • Sens de Repliez h >a hachure afin de j reveler le rebord PoD-un™ ! www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® ii Bend along line to j. expose Pop-up Edge™ ' AVERY® 5160® THOMAS M & JACQUELINE SOULLII 3208 CARVALLO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7702 KATHLEEN A SCHRADER 3210 CARVALLO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7702 H Sc ELLEN HAINES 3212 CARVALLO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7702 DAN EARLY 3217 CARVALLO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7702 CIMICATA 3215 CARVALLO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7702 L SARGENT 3213 CARVALLO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7702 JOHN F MACDONALD 32 09 CARVALLO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7702 DAVID R HILTON 3207 CARVALLO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7702 BARRY J NIMAN 7585 DELGADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7705 JOSEFINA L KATZ 7583 DELGADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7705 MARJORIE ACQUISTAPACE 7579 DELGADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7705 DIANA KLEIN 7577 DELGADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7705 PHILIP & PAULA KACSIR 7573 DELGADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7705 JENNIFER MARUN 7571 DELGADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7705 DON W & JUDITH LOBB 7599 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 CONCEPCION GARCIA 7597 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 EADY FRED L JR & ANNE I 7595 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 CRED: CASEY D LARSEN 7591 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 STEVEN E Sc JAMIE CRUZ 7589 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 MITSUHIRO & TOMOKO UCHIMURA 7587 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 LYDIA PETROFF 7583 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 ROBERT L FELL *B* 7581 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 MARILYN MARTINEAU *M* 7575 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 GREGORY J & REBECCA CARR *B* 7573 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 ROBERT W Sc TAMARA KEEFE 75 71 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 SUSAN K SHAW 7569 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 NICHOLAS SERINIS 7567 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 JERRY S & SHERYL PORTNOY 7565 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 GREG NORRIS 7563 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 ANTHONY C & CHERYL NENKO 7561 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 Etiquettes faciles ci peler Utilisez le qabarit AVERY® 5160® ^Sens de Repliez h la hachure afin de | reveler le rebord POD-UD'" 11 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Feed Paper Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge™ AVERYf 5160® BRENDAN W & MAYLIN GRIFFITHS 7559 CALOMA CIR 41 CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 MARILYN A SHERTZ 7557 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 ESTRELLITA & ESMERALDA RODRIC 7555 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 SUBHASH & SURBALA NANGIA 7578 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 SCOTT L & SHERRI MERRY 7580 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 BRIAN & TENNILLE AL-AZZAWI 7582 CALOMA CIR CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7714 WILLIAM L & SUSANNE KING 7565 AGUA DULCE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7701 YU PAI 7561 AGUA DULCE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7701 ANDREW & KAREN MALKIN 7559 AGUA DULCE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7701 DEBRA A PATANBLLA 7557 AGUA DULCE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7701 LOWELL E GATES 7555 AGUA DULCE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7701 KEITH R SHERMAN 7553 AGUA DULCE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7701 MARY L CAMPBELL 7551 AGUA DULCE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7701 RUSSELL KURTZ 7550 AGUA DULCE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7701 RUBINS 7552 AGUA DULCE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7701 DOUGLAS W & EMILIE MCBAIN 7554 AGUA DULCE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7701 SCOTT & HEATHER KILLEN 7556 AGUA DULCE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7701 DAVID A CHRISTIE 7558 AGUA DULCE CT 118 CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7701 STANLEY D JONES 3308 DORADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7706 JANET E BROWN 3314 DORADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7706 LOUIS A Sc CLAUDIA STORROW 3316 DORADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7706 JANE S BEVERIDGE 3318 DORADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7706 ROBERT & BARBARA ONEILL 3320 DORADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7706 ANDREW M & JEANINE ROWE 3321 DORADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7706 AMY Sc HUGH MARTIN 3317 DORADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7706 NIXON 2 008 3315 DORADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7706 KATHERINE S MISSELL 3309 DORADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7706 SHANNON C SMULL 3305 DORADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7706 LAURA A GARVER 3301 DORADO PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7706 JOHN SELLS 3336 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7815 Etiquettes fadles k peler Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160® A Sens de Repliez h la hachure afin de j reveler le rebord Pop-up'" 1 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge™ j|| AVERY® 5160® I OLSON FAMILY 3338 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7815 JOHN DELAND *M* 3350 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7815 SCOTT & DARCY FELD 33 52 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7815 CHARLES M Sc SANDRA BERNS *B* 3354 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7815 JON P Sc TISHA DORE 3353 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7816 DEBRA L WILSON-AIZIKOVITZ 3351 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7816 BRIAN BOWMAN 3349 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7816 JOSEPH G CHAREST 3347 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7816 VIGEN ZARIFIAN 3343 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7816 JORDAN Sc JUNKO SCHUCKIT 3 341 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7816 VITAL Sc JAYNE OSEGUEDA 3339 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7816 MURPHY FAMILY 3337 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7816 WENDELL H BEVERIDGE 3335 DEL RIO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7816 JOAN MIRINGOFF 7551 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7707 DENNIS 7521 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7827 JAMES Sc ROSALIND RICHARDS 3 34 0 BAJO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7801 TASHA RUIZ 7310 MUSLO LN CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7853 MICHAEL WENGLER 7314 BORLA PL CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7802 KENNETH S Sc ANGELINA LAKE 724 0 CARPA CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7812 BRADLEY F & LAURIE OWEN 3310 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7841 ISAK KHANIS 3312 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7841 HOWARD & TERRI WIEDRE 7441 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7824 ZINES 3319 CABO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7803 GIHBSSON 3 315 CABO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7803 EDWARD & PATRICIA CERDA 3 314 CABO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7803 MICHAEL S Sc CYNTHIA GRAY 3316 CABO CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7803 KENNETH C & SARA WAHL 7421 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7823 THOMAS E Sc SHERRYL MAXWELL 3341 VENADO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7850 PAUL J STEVENS 333 5 VENADO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7850 JEAN P OLMSTED 3331 VENADO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7850 Etiquettes faciles d peler j Utilisez le qabarit AVERY® 5160® ! Sens de Repliez h la hachure afin de j r^v^ler le rebord POD-UD™ ! www.avefy.com 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 5160® Ned Paper Bend along line to j expose Pop-up Edge™ ^\ AVERY<| 5160® I DAVID & DEBI CARR 3 322 VENADO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7849 FRED Sc SHIRLEY DANIEL 3332 VENADO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7849 LEE A Sc DIANE WOOD 3336 VENADO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7849 RAMESH C Sc SUDHA JAIN 3342 VENADO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-784 9 MCCREADY 3352 VENADO ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7849 ROBERT J PARADOWSKI 3329 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 MARC A DUXBURY 3327 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 MARBREY FAMILY 3325 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 SPRAGUE 3323 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 HAROLD L Sc VIVIAN GANO 3321 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 MICHAEL D & MICHELLE SENGER 3319 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 MAXWELL S Sc LINDA COLON 3317 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 ABOLGHASEM DOROUDI 3 315 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 DALE W Sc CHA KIMBALL 3313 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 RICHARD & CLAUDIA BARBOUR 3311 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7842 DAVID J & ANNA MINTZ 3314 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7841 FORD 3318 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7841 ANDREW & LORI MENCINSKY 332 0 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7841 DAVID A Sc KIMBERLY CLARKIN 3322 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7841 RONALD J Sc ROBIN ISRAEL 3324 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7841 RONALD & JUDY BOLTON 3326 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7841 ROY WISE 3328 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7841 MARK Sc CANDACE WEISS 7461 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7824 FARIBA Sc NATHAN SALEHI 7451 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7824 RICHARD Sc VALERIE CORLESS 743 6 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7845 JAMES A Sc KIRSTEN RECCE 7442 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7845 SHEERMAN 7446 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7845 DAVID MAS 7452 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7845 THOMAS CHYNCES 7456 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7845 SIMS 7462 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7845 Etiquettes faciles k peler Utilisez le aabarit AVERY® 5160® Sens de Repliez h la hachure afin de | reveler le rebord POD-UO™ ! www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel® Labels Us§ Avery® Template 5160® I 1« Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge™ J|^^ AVERY® 5160® 1 1 LASKI 333 9 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7844 JOANN PYNES 333 7 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7844 BRYAN M BURKE 3335 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7844 REBEKAH R PRICE 33 34 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92 009-7843 RICHARD D & JULIE KOCH 333 6 PIRAGUA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7843 MAN ALBERT K 7445 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7846 DIANE M KAATS 74 35 TRIGO LN CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7846 WILLIAM H Sc FELECIA HAYS 3327 CABO WAY CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7852 SUSAN B YORK 3323 CABO WAY CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7852 DONALD J BURTON *M* 7450 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7825 DIANNE L VENNARD 74 60 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7825 WILLIAM Sc BONITA ANDERSON 7466 ESFERA ST CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7825 JAMES P Sc JUDY PINPIN 8 057 PASEO ARRAYAN CARLSBAD, CA 92009-6963 CLYDE S RICHARDS 858 VIOLET CT CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3859 PRICE PO BOX 23175 ENCINITAS, CA 92 023 ROBERT A STINE 971 HYGEIA AVE ENCINITAS, CA 92024-1768 GEORGE Sc ELIZABETH WALKER 1048 HYGEIA AVE ENCINITAS, CA 92024-1708 KERNS 1844 HAYMARKET RD ENCINITAS, CA 92 024-1017 DANIEL A BINER 14 83 TENNIS MATCH WAY ENCINITAS, CA 92024-2940 Y C Sc LUNA FUNG 2660 GREENTREE LN LA JOLLA, CA 92037-1148 RYAN Sc MALISSA MORAN 4036 ALTO ST OCEANSIDE, CA 92056-4617 GERALD E Sc THELMA CHURCH 1035 SLEEPING INDIAN RD OCEANSIDE, CA 92057-1504 CAMERON R Sc MARNI BUSHELL PO BOX 2424 RANCHO SANTA , CA 92067-2424 JAMES B HASSELBERG PO BOX 1640 SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-7640 ROB & GREGORY KEPPLER *B* 12 03 SAN PABLO DR SAN MARCOS, CA 92078-4816 DAMON R Sc TAMERA WE I SSER 14 05 SCHOOLHOUSE WAY SAN MARCOS, CA 92078-1012 ARKINZADEH 50 06 AUGUST ST SAN DIEGO, CA 92110-1203 POOYA DARUGAR 112 04 WESTERN GAILES ROW SAN DIEGO, CA 92128-3640 SCHUYLER D GRANT 3 982 SAN MARTINE WAY SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-2266 LINKOGLE DORIAN S EXEMPT 41720 CALLE CABRILLO TEMECULA, CA 92592-9201 Etiquettes faciles k peler Utilisez le aabarit AVERY® 5160® A Sens de Repliez h la hachure afin de | reveler le rebord POD-UO™ I www.avery.com 1-ROO-GO.AVFRY I Easy Peel® Labels • — Bend along line to A\#Bnv(^ xen® i UseAvery®Template5160® ^^^eedPaper exposePop-5pEdge™ ^ AVERY^ 5160® ^ TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA DEBORAH NAVARRO MIKE M FARSHCHI 8105 IRVINE CENTER DR 1450 9140 LARKSPUR DR 1231 PROMONTORY TER IRVINE, CA 92618-4935 WESTMINSTER, CA 92683-7325 SAN RAMON, CA 94583-1572 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS ROXANNE P CORNEJO *** 23^ Printed *** 5918 STONERIDGE MALL RD 2533 THISTLE CREEK ST PLEASANTON, CA 94588-3229 SANTA ROSA, CA 95404-7739 Etiquettes fadles ll peler | ^ Repliez ^ la hachure afin de j www.avery.com Utilisez le aabarit AVERY® 5160® ! .•.-!!?!_?_-. reveler le reboni POD-UD™ ! 1-80n.GO-AVFRV APN 223-250-1400 Biological Resources Letter Report November 2013 Biological Resources Letter Report Single Family Home Development APN 223-250-1400 November 18, 2013 Presented to: City of Carlsbad Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 Under Contract with: Mr. Greg Goertzen, Directing Manager/Owner GS Development & Goertzen Homes PO Box 91335 San Diego, CA 92109 APN 223-250-1400 Biological Resources Letter Report Report The purpose of this report is to document the biological resources present in the vicinity of the proposed and construction of one single-family house and a guest house at the comer of Esfera Street and Venado Street in Carlsbad, Califomia. The property is found at Assessor's Parcel number 223-250-1400. The 1.04-acre property occurs at the corner of Esfera Street and Venado Street, is in a highly developed neighborhood of single-family homes. The project site is bounded by Esfera Street to the south, Venado Street to the west, and single family homes to the north and east (Figure 1). The calculations of habitat impact are given for the entire property; this assessment will cover the permanent development of a single family home and guest house and all necessary construction buffers. In order to inventory biological resources at the proposed project site, a site visit was conducted on September 19, 2013 by biologist Kyle McCann and Scott Snover. The two biologists spent approximately 1 hour conducting wandering transects through the entire property, recording all plant and wildlife observations and creating a map of the existing vegetation communities. The weather conditions were sunny and hot, with a clearing marine layer nearly dispersed for the day. Vegetation/Flora Table 1 and Figure 1 present the results of the vegetation mapping. Four vegetation communities (classified according to Holland 1986) were found to occur on the property: Coastal Sage Scrub, Disturbed; Non-Native Grassland; Eucalyptus Woodland; Disturbed/Barren. The central portion of the property consists of Disturbed Coastal Sage Scrub habitat. The area was dominated by typical coastal sage scrub plants including: coastal sagebrush, black sage and California buckwheat. Non-native grassland covers 0.18 acres of habitat on the western edge of the property adjacent to Venado Street. This habitat was dominated by tocalote and foxtail chess. Eucalyptus woodland separates the non-native grassland habitat and the disturbed coastal sage scrub. An extremely small portion of habitat was also found in the southeast corner of the property. Blue gum eucalyptus was dominant throughout this habitat type. The eastem portion of this property has a steep gradient increase leading up to the property on the eastem boundary. It appears to be fill soil from the building up of the foundation for the adjacent property. The habitat on this hillside leading up to the adjacent property was classified as disturbed because it contained very minimal vegetation and did not contour to the land. For a complete list of floral species (and Latin names) please refer to Appendix B. Vegetation Community Acres Coastal Sage Scrub, Disturbed 0.31 Non-Native Grassland 0.18 Eucalyptus Woodland 0.34 Disturbed/Barren 0.18 Ice plant 0.04 Table 1: Vegetation Communities found at APN 223-250-1400 APN 223-250-1400 Biological Resources Letter Report APN 223-250-1400 Biological Resources Letter Report November 2013 Zoological Resources-Fauna Fauna observed at the site were typical for an urban area. No mammals or mammal sign (scat, burrows, fur) were observed on site. Generally, biological activity was low. Observed avian species on and/or near the project site included: bushtit, house sparrow and American crow. For both the western fence lizard and side-blotched lizard a single specimen was observed. For a complete list of fauna species (and Latin names) please refer to Appendix B. APN 223-250-1400 Biological Resources Letter Report Prepared by: Elizabeth M. Kellogg Tierra Data Inc. 10110 W. Lilac Road Escondido, Califomia 92026 Elizabeth M. Kellogg, CEQA Consultant All maps were compiled by TDI, except if noted, using data believed to be accurate at the time ofpublication. However, a degree of error is inherent in all maps. The maps are distributed "AS-IS, " without warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, warranties of suitability to a particular purpose or use. No attempt has been made in either the design or production of the maps to define the limits or jurisdiction of any federal, state, or local government. The maps are intended for use only at the published scale. Detailed on- the-ground surveys and historical analyses of sites may differ from the maps. APN 223-250-1400 Biological Resources Letter Report APN 223-250-1400 Biological Resources Letter Report November 2013 Appendix A: Vegetation Map Vegetation Community Coastal sage scrub, disturbed Non-native grassland I Eucalyptus woodland Ice plant Disturbed I I Property boundary Vegetation Communities 4. I Meters 10 S 0 10 I Feet 20 10 0 20 40 60 Figure 1: Vegetation C ommunities of APN 223-250-1400 Appendix A: Vegetation Map A-1 This Page Intentionally Blank A-2 Appendix A: Vegetation Map APN 223-250-1400 Biological Resources Letter Report November 2013 Appendix B: Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Species Name Common Name Plants Aptenia cordifolia Baby Sun Rose Carpobrotus chilensis Sea-Fig Malosma laurina Laurel Sumac Schinus molle Peruvian Pepper Tree Foeniculum vuigare Sweet Fennel Ambrosia psilostachya Western Ragweed Artemisia californica Coastal Sagebrush Baccharis sarothroides Broom Baccharis Centaurea melitensis Tocalote Isocoma menziesii Spreading Goldenbush Osteospermum verticosum Senecio mikanioides German-Ivy Sonchus oleraceus Common Sow-Thistle Unknown forb Hirschfeldia incana Short-Pod Mustard Raphanus sativus llliilllllliilllllllilll^^ Opuntia ficus-indica Mission Prickly-Pear Opuntia littoralis Coast Prickly-Pear Salsola tragus Russian-Thistle, Tumbleweed Erodium sp. Filaree Salvia leucophylla San Luis Purple Sage Salvia mellifera Black Sage Eucalyptus globulus Blue Gum Eriogonum fasciculatum Appendix B: Plant and Wildlife Species Observed B-1 Anagallis arvensis Scarlet Pimpernel Tribulus terrestris Puncture Vine Washingtonia robusta Mexican Fan Palm Bromus madritensis Foxtail Chess Cynodon dactylon Bermuda Grass Pinus sp. Pine tree, seedling Fish, Amphibians and Reptiles Sceloporus occidentalis Western Fence Lizard Uta stansburiana Common Side-blotched Lizard Birds Carpodacus mexicanus House Finch Corvus brachyrhynchos American Crow 1 Mimus polyglottos Northern Mockingbird Passer domesticus House Sparrow Psaltripams minimus Bushtit Sayornis nigricans Black Phoebe B-2 Appendix B: Plant and Wildlife Species Observed <# CITY OF ^ CARLSBAD Memorandum-1 November 4, 2013 To: Chris Garcia, Project Planner From: Steve Bobbett, Project Engineer Via: Jason Geldert, Senior Engineer Re: PROJECT ID: MS 13-08; PROJECT NAME: GOERTZEN RESIDENCE APN: 223-250-14 FIRST COMPLETENESS & ISSUES REIEW Land Development Engineering staff has completed a review ofthe above-referenced project for application completeness. The application and plans submitted forthis proposed project are currently incomplete due to the lack of a geotechnical report. The proposed project has been preliminarily reviewed and the following comments are provided. Additional comments may need to be addressed following review ofthe geotechnical report. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: 1. The preliminary title report dated Sept. 20, 2013 submitted with the application, in Schedule B, Item 4 notes a public utility and tree easement per Map 7950. Show the location ofthe easement on the tentative map. No grading or private improvements should be constructed within this area, other than private underground storm drains to the public storm drain in the street. 2. The preliminary title report dated Sept. 20, 2013 submitted with the application, in Schedule B, Item 6 notes an easement to improve and replace utilities. Provide a copy of the easement document and make note of same on the tentative map. 3. A preliminary geotechnical report is required. A qualified geotechnical engineer shall provide slope stability, grading and retaining wall recommendations. The slope stability recommendation should address the potential for surficial slope failure on Parcel 2. 4. Only the grading concept should be shown as a part ofthis application. The building footprints should be removed. Future building locations should conform to the required dwelling setback from the retaining wall / slope to the building, per City of Carlsbad Standard Drawing GS -15 for both Parcels 1 and 2. 5. Show any existing walls or fences along the north project boundary adjacent to Lot 455. 6. Show the existing pool and other hardscape improvements on Lot 455 adjacent to the project boundary. 7. Show top of wall, and finish grade elevations along the proposed retaining walls at the Community & Economic Development 1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 I 760-602-8560 fax I www.carlsbadca.gov MS 13-08, Tierra La costa Nov 4, 2013 Page 2 ends, angle points, BCs, EC, or changes in wall heights as needed to represent the wall height. 8. The brow ditch along the northwest top of slope of Parcel 2 should be intercepted and routed to the area drain on Parcel 2. 9. Show a 10' wide "Proposed Easement for Drainage for the Benefit of Parcel 2" over the storm drain in the northeast corner of Parcel 1. 10. Show the existing curb inlet at the ECR of Venado Street. 11. Sanitary sewer service in this area is provided by the Leucadia Wastewater District. Contact the district at 1960 La Costa Ave. or by phone at (760) 753-0155 regarding their requirements for service. 12. Potable water service in this area is provided by the Olivenhain Municipal Water District. Contact the district at 1966 Olivenhain Rd. or by phone at (760) 753-6466. Coordinate the size ofthe service line and water meter with Carlsbad Fire Protection Services, see below. 13. Revise the construction notes as needed to indicate that the existing water lateral and sewer service for the benefit of Parcel 1 are per OMWD and LWD respectively. 14. Revise the construction notes as needed to indicate that the proposed water lateral and sewer service for the benefit of Parcel 2 are per OMWD and LWD respectively. Obtain OMWD and LWD approval forthe location ofthe water service and sewer lateral to be located in the driveway. 15. Revise construction note 5. Delete the reference to the city standard. 16. Fire protection services in this area are provided bythe Carlsbad Fire Department. Each lot will be required to install a 1" water service and a 1" water meter to serve each residential fire sprinkler system. Fire Protection Services can be reached at 1635 Faraday Ave. or by phone at (760) 602-4665. 17. Show all fire hydrants within 300' ofthe project boundary. 18. Show the existing driveways to the north of the project on Venado Street and across the street from the project on Venado Street. 19. Show Del Rio Court on Esfera Street. 20. Maintain the corner sight distance requirement of the city landscape manual. No landscape elements over 30" in height are allowed in this zone from a point 25' along the curb face from the BCR of Esfara Street to a point 25' along the curb fact from the ECR on Venado Street. The proposed fill slope within this area needs to be revised to meet this standard. 21. Show the construction of sidewalk along Venado Street from the ECR to the existing driveway to the northwest. MS 13-08, Tierra La costa Nov 4, 2013 Page 3 Soils Report Comments 22. The "Site Inspection" document prepared by Soil Testers (assumed soils report) that was submitted is incomplete. Please provide a new and complete geotechnical report. The following are items to be included or addressed, along with previously provided information, as part ofthe new report. Note that additional comments may be forthcoming when a complete report is submitted and reviewed. 23. Due to the nature ofthe project, the geotechnical report shall be additionally signed and stamped by a State of California Certified Engineering Geologist or a separate geology report signed and stamped by a California Certified Engineering Geologist may be submitted. 24. Please provide a complete description ofthe proposed project. Include heights of cut/fill slopes, retaining walls and anticipated cuts and fill depths, etc. 25. Provide a location map with reference north, scale, etc. 26. Provide boring/test pit logs. Logs should include soil/bedrock descriptions with depth, type and depth of sampling, elevations (real or assumed), ground water conditions. 27. Provide a description ofthe lab tests performed, referenced test methods (ASTM, EPA, etc.) and lab data. 28. Provide soluble sulfate testing results. 29. Please provide an earth materials section that includes: a. Description and designation of geologic units (surficial soils and bedrock, including depth and thickness) b. Geologic structure (bedding, fracturing, faulting of bedrock material) c. Description of regional geologic conditions (including reported trends of bedding and faulting 30. Provide a seismicity section that includes: a. General description of regional and local faulting (The following are per section 1613 ofthe 2010 California Building Code) b. Site class c. Mapped spectral acceleration parameters (Ss,Si) d. Site Coefficients (Fa, Fv) e. Design Spectral Acceleration Parameters (SDS, SDI) f. Seismic Design Category 31. Discuss the following geologic hazards mapped or otherwise: a. Seismically induced landsliding b. Expansive soils c. Ground water d. Soluble Sulfate e. Liquefaction f. Slope creep MS 13-08, Tierra La costa Nov 4, 2013 Page 4 g. Surficial slope instability h. Total and differential settlement (provide values) 32. Provide a scaled geotechnical map that includes, but not limited to, the following: a. Existing topography and improvements b. Proposed topography and improvements c. Location of subsurface exploration d. Geologic contacts e. Geologic structure 33. Provide scaled geologic cross-sections that include, but not limited to, the following: a. Existing topography and improvements b. Proposed topography and improvements c. Location of subsurface explorations d. Slope setbacks e. Temporary cuts f. Slope benching 34. Please provide recommendations for foundations placed next to utility trenches 35. Please address potential fill/bedrock transition areas and any necessary mitigation. 36. If the foundations recommendations are intended to mitigate expansive soils, please provide the necessary calculations in accordance with section 1808.6.2 ofthe 2010 California Building Code. Otherwise, clarify that the recommendations are minimums and that the foundations system should ultimately be designed in accordance with section 1808.6.2 ofthe 2010 California Building Code. 37. Please provide minimum width of footings. 38. Please the coefficient of friction and lateral bearing values. 39. Please provide slope setbacks for improvements. 40. Provide soluble sulfate mitigation. 41. Provide retaining wall recommendations. 42. Soils that have an expansion index of 20 or greater are considered expansion and require mitigation. Please review the recommended criteria for non-expansive soil for capping. An expansion index 30 was recommended. Please revise as necessary to conform the California Building Code. If you or the applicant has any questions, please either see or contact me at 760-602-2747 or by e-mail at steve.bobbett@carlsbadca.gov. Steve Bobbett, P.E. Associate Engineer Land Development Engineering CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: OCTOBER 21, 2013 PROJECT NO(S): MS 13-08 REVIEW NO: 1 PROJECTTITLE: TIERRA LA COSTA APPLICANT: GS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/GREG GOERTZEN TO: Land Development Engineering-Steve Bobbett • Public Works (Storm Drain) - Clayton Dobbs • Police Department-J. Sasway • Public Works (Wastewater) - Don Wasko Fire Department - Greg Ryan • Public Works (Water) - Jase Warner Building Division - Will Foss • Water/Sewer District • Parks & Recreation (Parks/Trails) -Liz Ketabian • Landscape Plancheck Consultant - PELA • Parks & Recreation (Trees & Medians) - Mike Bliss • School District • Public Works Department (Streets) - Nick Roque • North County Transit District - Planning Dept. • Public Works Department (Traffic) -John Kim • Sempra Energy - Land Management • Public Works Department (Design) - Bill Plummer • Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DIVISION Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the PLANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Division at 1635 FaradayAvenue, bv 11/11/13. Ifyou have "No Comments," please so state. If vou determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediatelv contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Thank you COMMENTS: ' Date PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 03/13 C/faJ CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Discretionary Review Checklist PROJECT NUMBER: MS 13-08 BUILDING ADDRESS: VENADO & ESFERA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LOT SPLIT AND CONSTRUCTION OF (?) SFR'S ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 223-250-14-00 FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore, any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of penmit to build. By: G. RYAN Date: 11.13.2013 DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with (El. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: By: By: Date: Date: Date: ATTACHMENTS: See notes on page 2. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON NAME: ADDRESS: 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad.CA 92008 PHONE: (760) 602-4665 FIRE SPRINKLERS • 2ND1 • • 1. Automatic fire sprinkler systems are required for each of the dwellings: • • • 2. Provide notes on all plans submitted for review that indicate that fire sprinklers are required. WATER METERS • • • 4. You will be required to install a one inch (1") or greater water service and water meter. This is to ensure that there is adequate water provided in the event of a fire sprinkler activation during periods of other uses and/or demands, e.g. irrigation. Vc ARLSBAD LJTILL Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov May 13, 2014 Greg Goertzen 3466 Camino Michelle Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF RESTRICTION - MS 13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01 - TIERRA LA COSTA Dear Applicant: Please find the enclosed Notice of Restriction that needs to be signed, notarized, and returned for recordation. This is to fulfill a condition of approval of the Tentative Parcel Map, Hillside Development Permit and Habitat Management Plan Permit. Please ensure the following items are addressed prior to returning the Notice of Restriction: ^ Correct Notary Acknowledgement Required (Effective Januarv 1, 2008. all Certificates of Acknowledgement used by a California notarv on a document that will be recorded in the State of California must NOT HAVE "PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME" in the acknowledgement. (Assembly Bill 886, Chapter 399)) ^ Document must be properly notarized. ^ Name on signature page and name on Notarial Acknowledgement must match. ^ Property owner's signatures/initials must be the same as on Notary Acknowledgement. Notary seal cannot be blurry/too light (County will not record the document if any portion of the Notary Seal is blurry or too light) Include property owner's name in the designated space above the owner's signature. ^ Please pay particular attention to the signature requirements at the bottom of the signature page. It is our goal to assist you in getting the Notice of Restriction recorded as expeditiously as possible. If you have any questions or need additional assistance, please contact Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst at (760) 602-4615 or via email at michele.masterson@carlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, CHRIS GARCIA Junior Planner Michele Masterson, CED Senior Management Analyst File Copy Planning Division 1635 FaradayAvenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ^>CAi<LSBAD Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov April 3, 2014 Greg Goertzen 3466 Camino Michelle Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: MS 13-08 / HDP 14-01 / HMP 14-01 - TIERRA LA COSTA Dear Mr. Goertzen, Your project was deemed complete on February 21. 2014. There are issues of concern with the project that remain to be resolved. The issues are listed on the attached page(s). All remaining project issues must be addressed by May 5, 2014. If all project issues are not resolved by the date listed above, you may formally request a one-time 90 day application extension. Otherwise, you will need to withdraw the application. Please contact me at 760-602-4622, ifyou have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, CHRIS GARCIA Junior Planner Attachment CG:fn c: YC Luna Fung Trust, 2660 Greentree Ln, La Jolla, CA 92037 GS Development Corp, PO Box 91335, San Diego, CA 92169 Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Steve Bobbett, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® |«|||^ ll«8/|l|i|4-01/HMP 14-01 -TIERRA LA COSTA me, ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please revise the landscape plans to incorporate the comments date March 13,2014. 2. Please submit two sets of the revised plans, including the landscape plans, to the Planning Division. Engineering: 1. Second review requested CalTrans available sight distance. Revise the site plan to show 150' 'stopping sight distance' measured from the observation points shown to a vehicle traveling in the westbound lane of Esfera. Distance should not be measured to centerline. Revise the site plan to show 220' 'stopping sight distance' measured from the observation points shown to a vehicle traveling in the eastbound lane of Esfera. Distance should not be measured to centerline. MS 13-08 / HDP 14-01 / HMP 14-01 - Tierra La Costa - Administrative Hearing March 24, 2014 4:00PM - Sign-In Sheet Name Address Phone Email 4. •CARLSBAD COPT Community & Economic Development www.carisbadca.gov March 19, 2014 Greg Goertzen 3466 Camino Michelle Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: MS 13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01 - TIERRA LA COSTA - CAUFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) APPUCABILITY/PROCESS DETERMINATION AND TARGET DECISION DATE CEQA Determination: This is to advise you that after reviewing the application for the project referenced above, the City has determined that the following environmental review process (pursuant to CEQA) will be required for the project: The project is exempt from the provisions of CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Categorical Exemption for Minor Land Divisions - State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 and In-Fill Development Projects - State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. No environmental review is required forthe project. A Notice of Exemption will be filed after approval of the project with the San Diego County Clerk's Office which involves a filing fee. Please submit a check to the project planner in the amount of $50.00 made out to the San Diego County Clerk. The check should be submitted approximately one week prior to the City Planner decision date. Target Decision Date: In the interest of expeditiously processing your application consistent with the State Permit Streamlining Act (California Government Code Section 65950), an administrative decision to approve or deny the project should be determined by May 19, 2014. Therefore, in the interest of achieving that decision date/hearing date, all remaining project issues must be addressed by May 5, 2014. If all project issues are not resolved by the date listed above, you may formally request a one-time 90 day application extension. Otherwise, you will need to withdraw the application. For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination or should you have any questions regarding an application extension or would like to withdraw your application, please contact Chris Garcia at 760-602-4622 or by email at Chris.Garcia@carlsbadca.gov. Sincerely, DON NEU, AlCP City Planner DN:CG:fn c: Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner Steve Bobbett, Project Engineer Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® Chris Garcia From: Chris Garcia Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:03 AM To: 'Marc Duxbury' Cc: erin@countylawcenter.com Subject: RE: Case No. MS 13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01; Tierra La Costa Mr. Duxbury, I am willing to meet with you to go over the proposed projects and hear your concerns. The following comments are a brief response to your questions you asked in your letter dated February 12, 2014. 1. The lot will generally be split in half and will be approximately 120' x ISO' in dimension for each lot. Both homes are proposed to be accessed from Esfera Street. 2. One single family residence on each lot is proposed at this time. One of the lots is proposing a smaller Second Dwelling Unit which is permitted by right under state law for lots containing a single family residence. However, the design of the homes are not a part of these permits. The proposed homes will be required to meet all development standards such as building height and lot coverage and will be reviewed during the building permit process. The proposed pad elevations are 312' for the "lower" lot and 321' for the "upper lot". Please note that your home located at 3327 Piragua Street has an approximate pad level of 360' elevation. 3. As stated previously, the closest proposed home pad level is approximately 40' beiow your lot. Single family homes in this area are permitted to be constructed up to 35' to the roof peak. Therefore, the home will sit below the pad elevation of your lot. In addition, the buildable area on the "upper lot" is located approximately 85' from your property line which is a significantly greater distance that the 10' required setback for the lot. Please also note that the City of Carlsbad does not have a view preservation ordinance and does not protect any private views. 4. The "upper lot" will require a new retaining wall up to 6' in height and some additional regarding ofthe existing slope. No grading is proposed within approximately 50' from your property line. The Engineering Division will ensure that any grading does not negatively affect your property. Field inspections occur after a grading permit is issued. 5. Trees will be removed on the subject property. However, additional trees and landscaping will be added to the site. A conceptual landscape plan has been submitted and is available to be reviewed at the city office. It is unclear if you are requesting an administrative hearing or if you wanted to wait until a response to your questions was received. Ifyou wish to request an administrative hearing, please let me know by email or mail before February 20th. I can meet with you at your convenience to go over the plans. If I am unavailable, the plans are still able to be reviewed at the Planning Counter. The Planning Division is located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carisbad, CA 92008 on the first floor. The business hours are Monday - Thursday from 7:30am - 5:30pm and Fridays from Sam - 5pm. If you wish to schedule a meeting with me, please contact me by email at Chris.GarciaPcarlsbadca.gov or by phone at 760-602-4622. Sincerely, CITY CARLSBAD Planning Division Chris Garcia Junior Planner City ofCarlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carisbad, CA 92008 www.carlsbadca.gov P: 760-602-4622 F: 760-602-8559 chris.garcia(5)carlsbadca.gov From: Marc Duxbury [mailto:marc(5)countylawcenter.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:52 PM To: Chris Garcia Cc: erin(5)countylawcenter.com Subject: Case No. MS 13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01; Tierra La Costa Dear Mr. Garcia, Please see attached letter regarding Tierra La Costa. Very truly yours. Marc Duxbury V (CARLSBAD Community & Economic Development www.carlsbadca.gov February 21, 2014 Greg Goertzen 3466 Camino Michelle Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: 2ND REVIEW FOR MS 13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01 - TIERRA LA COSTA Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Tentative Parcel Map, Hillside Development Permit and Habitat Management Plan Permit, application nos. MS 13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01, as to its completeness for processing. The items requested from you earlier to make your Tentative Parcel Map, Hillside Development Permit and Habitat Management Plan Permit complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Division. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. At this time, the City asks that you provide two (2) complete sets of the development plans so that the project can continue to be reviewed. The Citv will complete the review of vour resubmittal within 25 davs. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Chris Garcia, at 760-602-4622, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: Land Development Engineering Division: Steve Bobbett, Associate Engineer, at 760-602-2747. Fire Department: Greg Ryan, Fire Inspections, at 760-602-4661. Sincerely, /UU> CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:CG:fn c: YC Luna Fung Trust, 2660 Greentree Ln, La Jolla, CA 92037 GS Development Corp, PO Box 91335, San Diego, CA 92169 Don Neu, City Planner Steve Bobbett, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File Copy . DataEntry. Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 ® 8/iJDaJ4-01/HMP 14-01 - TIERRA LA COSTA ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please add all project numbers to the top right corner of the plans (MS 13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01). 2. Please add or provide the gross lot area for each lot. 3. Please remove the vegetation areas shown on the constraints map. The map and information provided in the biology letter report is sufficient. 4. The slope legend only adds up to .46 acres of land. Please correct the legend to show all of the 1.02 acres of the site. 5. The net area for calculating density shall include all slopes 0-25% and 40% and up. However, only 50% ofthe area of slopes 25-40% can be counted. Please update the density ofthe project based on the updated slope constraints. Engineering: 1. A preliminary geotechnical report was recently received, but not adequate time was not available to provide comments at this time. The report should address slope stability, grading and retaining wall recommendations. The slope stability recommendation should address the potential for surficial slope failure on Parcel 2. See attachment for additional elements that should be addressed. 2. Revise construction note 10. Refer to storm drain cleanout. 3. Relocate construction note 18 (water meter) to the correct location for Parcel 2. 4. Show available CalTrans sight distance for vehicles turning right from both driveways. Landscape: 1. Landscape comments provided under separate correspondence. Marc & Erin Duxbury 3327 Piragua St. Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 479-0620 City of Carlsbad FEB 1 4 2014 Planning Division February 12,2014 City of Carlsbad Planning Division 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Via email to Chris. Garcia@carlsbadca.gov RE: Case No. MS 13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01 Tierra La Costa To whom it may concem: This letter is in response to your correspondence of Febmary 4, 2014 regarding the above case number (letter attached for your reference). I am writing to object to the granting of this parcel split. I need clarification and have questions regarding the following: 1. How is this lot that is 115' wide at its narrowest point going to be split? 2. Will there be two (2) single family residences eventually built on the two lots? If so, how/where will the houses be built, i.e. side by side facing Venado? Side by side facing Esfera with one home on the low part of the slope and the other home farther up the slope? 3. Will these homes obstmct my current view as my property sits directly behind this lot(s) on Piragua Street? If so, an obstmction of my view will severely decrease the value of my home and I vehemently object to that. 4. If the current slope of the lot has to be graded in any way in order to build a residence on, how is that going to affect my property? 5. Will any trees be removed, if so which ones? The removal of trees could severely curtail the use and enjoyment of my property as it stands now as well as decrease the value of my home. If these questions and concems warrant an administrative hearing, then I respectfiilly request one. I have serious concems about this lot split and how it will affect the value of my home City of Carlsbad Febmary 12, 2014 Page 2 as well as the safety of its current fotmdation if there will be slope grading in the future. Please feel fi-ee to contact me any time at my home (760) 479-0620 or on my cell phone (760) 521-5321. Very tmly y Marc A. Duxbury Chris Garcia From: Chris Garcia Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:08 AM To: 'rparadowsk@roadrunner.com' Subject: Tierra La Costa - Response to Comments Mr. Paradowski, I am willing to meet with you to go over the proposed projects and hear your concerns. The following comments are a brief response to your questions asked in your letter received on February 11, 2014. 1. One single family residence on each lot is proposed at this time. One of the lots is proposing a smaller Second Dwelling Unit which is permitted by right under state law for lots containing a single family residence. Both homes are proposed to be two stories. However, the design ofthe homes are not a part of these permits. 2. The lot will generally be split in half and will be approximately 120' x 150' in dimension for each lot. Your lot at 3329 Piragua Street is approximately lOO'xllS' with the existing home covering about a 55' x 55' area. The proposed buildable area forthe "upper lot" is approximately 78' x 95' with the "lower lot" having a larger buildable area. The one half acre lots are similar to lots fronting on Esfera Street to the south and provide a good transition to the smaller lots located to the east on Esfera Street. The proposed homes will be required to meet all development standards such as building height and lot coverage and will be reviewed during the building permit process. 3. As stated previously, the lots will be approximately 120' x 150' each. I do not have a calculation of the lot size excluding the slope, but the buildable pad area is proposed to be about 7,400 square feet. 4. Both homes are proposed to be accessed from Esfera Street. 5. A two-car garage is required for the homes. However, I believe that at least one of the homes is proposed to have at least a three-car garage. Again, the homes are not part of these permits and are reviewed for compliance will all development standards during the building permit process. 6. The hillside development ordinance and guidelines permit up to a six foot retaining wall to be cut into the slope. The "upper lot" will require a new retaining wall up to 6' in height and some additional regarding ofthe existing slope. No grading is proposed within approximately 50' from your property line. The Engineering Division will ensure that any grading does not negatively affect your property. Field inspections occur after a grading permit is issued. 7. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will not be prepared for this project. Although an environmental determination has not yet been made on the project, it is anticipated to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 which exempts minor land divisions into 4 or fewer parcels if the project is consistent with the city's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 8. The proposed pad elevations are 312' forthe "lower" lot and 321' forthe "upper lot". Please note that your home located at 3329 Piragua Street has an approximate pad level of 360' elevation. Single family homes in this area are permitted to be constructed up to 35' to the roof peak. Therefore, the home will sit below the pad elevation of your lot. In addition, the buildable area on the "upper lot" is located approximately 85' from your property line which is a significantly greater distance than the 10' required setback for the lot. Please also note that the City of Carlsbad does not have a view preservation ordinance and does not protect any private views. The City of Carlsbad does not take into account property values when making a determination on a Tentative Parcel Map, Hillside Development Permit or Habitat Management Plan Permit. Traffic impacts for this project would be negligible and therefore not a significant impact. The proposed project does not propose any multi-family units. 9. Trees will be removed on the subject property. However, additional trees and landscaping will be added to the site. A conceptual landscape plan has been submitted and is available to be reviewed at the city office. 10. CC&R's can be more restrictive, but not less restrictive than city codes. However in general, CC&R's are a private matter and are not enforced by the city. I can meet with you at your convenience to go over the plans. If I am unavailable, the plans are still able to be reviewed at the Planning Counter. The Planning Division is located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 on the first floor. The business hours are Monday - Thursday from 7:30am - 5:30pm and Fridays from Sam - 5pm. If you wish to schedule a meeting with me, please contact me by email at Chris.GarciaPcarlsbadca.gov or by phone at 760-602-4622. Sincerely, CITY OF CARLSBAD Planoing Division Chris Garcia Junior Planner City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 www.carlsbadca.gov P: 760-602-4622 F; 760-602-8559 chris.garcia@carlsbadca.gov City of Carlsbad Planning Division re: Tierra La Costa 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RJ Paradowski 3329 Piragua Street Carlsbad, GA 92009 rparadov^fskta roadrunner.com 760.436.5122 City of Carlsbad FEB 11 2014 Planning Division Dear Planning Commission, I have a number of questions regarding the granting of the Tentative Parcel Map, Hillside Development Permit and Habitat Management Plan Permit for a lot split action proposed at the north east corner of Esfera Street and Venado Street, Carlsbad, California described as: Lot 456 of Carlsbad Tract No. 72-20 La Costa Vale Unit No.3, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Califomia, according to map thereof No. 7950, filed in the Office of the county recorder of San Diego County June 3,1974. A recent call to the planning department after I observed surveying activity provided assurance that the planned construction was to be a single family detached house. This action is requesting a lot split in a neighborhood of large lots and/or single family detached homes. While the size of the lot is listed at 1.02 acre, the actual buildable allowing for pool sized backyards is much smaller. Items at issue: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Is the permit for 2 single family detached houses? Single story or multi story? Lot 456 appears to be only ~115' wide at narrowest point. My lot (455) is 110' wide and has a single 2,990 sq. ft. house. It seems that two single family detached houses matching the neighboring aesthetics would not fit. Has this been addressed? Size of each lot after split excluding hillside? Driveway access? Venato and/or Esfera? Minimum garages on Venato are 3. Does this plan allow for 3 garages/house? Does this permit allow incursion into the slope? Has an EIR been performed? What was the outcome? Has the impact to neighbors, traffic and property values if this lot split allows for multifamily units and more than a 2 story structure(s) been evaluated. Will the trees be spared? 10. Does this impact compliance with any pre-existing CC&Rs? Robert Paradowski Carlsbad Resident Since 1985 Chris Garcia From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Recce@sbcglobal.net Monday, February 10, 2014 10:26 AM Chris Garcia Kirsten at Black Whale Lighting lot subdividing Case MS13-08/HDP 14-01/HMP 14-01 Dear Mr. Garcia, I am against the proposal for subdividing the lot 456 Tract # 72-20 located at the north east comer of Esfera Street and Venado Street in southem Carlsbad. Currently this lot and the lots along Venado Street are of similar size. Subdividing this lot will dismpt the overall continuity of this area. There is no reason except from a financial gain that requires subdividing this lot which 1 feel is not a good justification for granting this request. 1 respectively ask that this request be denied. Sincerely, Alan Recce 7442 Trigo Lane Carsbad, CA. CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING. INC. t44t MOITIEl R0», SIITE IIS I ESCOXBItO. CA lllll I 7II.74I.4IM I FM 711.741.1111 January 22, 2013 Attn: Chris DeCerbo Planning Division 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Tentative Parcel Map, Application No. MS 13-08 1st Review for MS 13-08 - Tierra La Costa: Dated November 7, 2013. In response to the above referenced 1 st Review comments Construction Testing & Engineering, Inc. (CTE) revised & updated the proposed Tentative Parcel Map to comply with all of your comments. The following is provided per your request & for clarification: To help facilitate review, the following sequence of responses coincides with the comments received. Issues of Concem: Planning 1. Project number has been updated to MS 13-08, HDP 13-XX and HMP 13-XX. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 2. Changed the dwelling units proposed from three to two. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 3. Changed the proposed density of the project to be 1.96du/ac. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 4. Changed the school district from Carlsbad Unified to Encinitas / San Dieguito. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 5. Property line dimensions are added in the revised Tentative Parcel Map. 6. Required front, side and rear yard setbacks are added to each proposed parcel. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 7. Elevations are called out along the proposed walls. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 8. Biology letter report and associated maps are updated. See updated biology report. Issues of Concem: Engineering 1. Public utility and tree easement are called on the plan. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 2. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 3. A preliminary geotechnical report is provided with this re-submittal package. 4. The building footprints are removed from the plan. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 5. Any existing walls or fences along the north project boundary adjacent to Lot 455 are shown on the revised Tentative Parcel Map. 6. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 7. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 8. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 9. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 10. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 11. Sanitary Sewer service availability letter will be submitted. 12. Potable water service availability letter will be submitted. 13. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 14. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 15. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 16. Fire Protection service availability letter will be submitted. 17. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 18. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 19. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 20. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. 21. See revised Tentative Parcel Map. If you have any questions please call me at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. Daniel T. Math, RCE Principal Engineer <£^^ CITY OF W\«".\^<a nH)l3 ^^CARLSBAD FILE COPY Community & Economic Development www.carisbadca.gov November 7, 2013 Greg Goertzen 3466 Camino Michelle Carlsbad, CA 92009 SUBJECT: 1ST REVIEW FOR MS 13-08 - TIERRA LA COSTA Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed your Tentative Parcel Map, application no. MS 13-08, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. The second list is project issues of concern to staff. In order to expedite the processing of your application, the "incomplete" items and your response to the project issues of concern to Staff must be submitted directly to your staff planner; therefore, please contact your staff planner directly to schedule a re-submittal appointment. As part of your re-submittal package, please prepare and include with your re-submittal: (1) a copy of these lists, (2) a detailed letter summarizing how all identified incomplete items and/or project issues have been addressed; and (3) five (5) sets of revised plans. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted, the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, October 21, 2013, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. In order to expedite the processing of your application, you are strongly encouraged to contact your Staff Planner, Chris Garcia, at 760-602-4622, to discuss or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may also contact each commenting department individually as follows: • Land Development Engineering Division: Steve Bobbett, Associate Engineer, at 760-602-2747. • Fire Department: Greg Ryan, Fire Inspections, at (760) 602-4661. Sincerely, CHRIS DeCERBO Principal Planner CD:CG:fn c: YC Luria Fung Trust, 2660 Greentree Ln, La Jolla, CA 92037 GS Development Corp, PO Box 91335, San Diego, CA 92169 Don Neu, City Planner Steve Bobbett, Project Engineer Chris DeCerbo, Principal Planner File Copy Data Entry Planning Division 1635 FaradayAvenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 MS 13-08 - TIERRA LA COSTA 12013 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: 1. A minor Hillside Development Permit is required for this project. Please submit for a minor Hillside Development Permit with the re-submittal of this application. Please be sure to include the cross sections and other required information listed in Planning Division application P-5 and pay the current application fee of $2,476.00. 2. A minor Habitat Management Plan permit is required for this project. Please submit the required information in Planning Division application P-17 and pay the current application fee of $544.00. 3. Applications can be found on the City of Carlsbad's website at: http://www.carlsbadca.gov/services/departments/plannine/Pages/applications.aspx Engineermg: 1. A preliminary geotechnical report is required. Please see comment #3 under the engineering issues section below. t . MS 13-08-TIERRA LA COSTA November 7, 2013 Page 3 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please put the project numbers at the top right corner of the plans; MS 13-08, HDP 13-XX, HMP 13- XX. 2. Change the number of dwelling units proposed from three to two. 3. Change the proposed density of the project to be 1.96 du/ac. 4. Change the school district from Carlsbad Unified to Encinitas / San Dieguito. 5. Add the property line dimensions for each proposed parcel. 6. Add the required front, side, and rear yard setbacks to each proposed parcel. Front yard and rear yard setbacks are 20' and the side yard setbacks are 10' for both parcels. Please note that the front yard of Parcel 1 is measured back from Venado Street, while the front yard of Parcel 2 is measured back from Esfera Street. 7. Show a top of wall/bottom of wall elevation for several points along any proposed walls including the worst case / tallest wall. Walls shall be limited to a maximum six feet in height. 8. The biology letter report and associated maps appear to be inaccurate. One example being that the existing ground cover along Esfera Street is depicted as disturbed Coastal Sage Scrub. Please verify that the vegetation mapping and biology letter report are accurate. Engineering: 1. The preliminary title report dated Sept. 20, 2013 submitted with the application, in Schedule B, Item 4 notes a public utility and tree easement per Map 7950. Show the location ofthe easement on the tentative map. No grading or private improvements should be constructed within this area, other than private underground storm drains to the public storm drain in the street. 2. The preliminary title report dated Sept. 20, 2013 submitted with the application, in Schedule B, Item 6 notes an easement to improve and replace utilities. Provide a copy of the easement document and make note of same on the tentative map. 3. A preliminary geotechnical report is required. A qualified geotechnical engineer shall provide slope stability, grading and retaining wall recommendations. The slope stability recommendation should address the potential for surficial slope failure on Parcel 2. 4. Only the grading concept should be shown as a part of this application. The building footprints should be removed. Future building locations should conform to the required dwelling setback from the retaining wall / slope to the building, per City of Carlsbad Standard Drawing GS -15 for both Parcels 1 and 2. 5. Show any existing walls or fences along the north project boundary adjacent to Lot 455. MS 13-08 - TIERRA LA COSTA November 7, 2013 Page 4 6. Show the existing pool and other hardscape improvements on Lot 455 adjacent to the project boundary. 7. Show top of wall, and finish grade elevations along the proposed retaining walls at the ends, angle points, BCs, EC, or changes in wall heights as needed to represent the wall height. 8. The brow ditch along the northwest top of slope of Parcel 2 should be intercepted and routed to the area drain on Parcel 2. 9. Show a 10' wide "Proposed Easement for Drainage for the Benefit of Parcel 2" over the storm drain in the northeast corner of Parcel 1. 10. Show the existing curb inlet at the ECR of Venado Street. 11. Sanitary sewer service in this area is provided by the Leucadia Wastewater District. Contact the district at 1960 La Costa Ave. or by phone at (760) 753-0155 regarding their requirements for service. 12. Potable water service in this area is provided by the Olivenhain Municipal Water District. Contact the district at 1966 Olivenhain Rd. or by phone at (760) 753-6466. Coordinate the size ofthe service line and water meter with Carlsbad Fire Protection Services, see below. 13. Revise the construction notes as needed to indicate that the existing water lateral and sewer service for the benefit of Parcel 1 are per OMWD and LWD respectively. 14. Revise the construction notes as needed to indicate that the proposed water lateral and sewer service for the benefit of Parcel 2 are per OMWD and LWD respectively. Obtain OMWD and LWD approval forthe location ofthe water service and sewer lateral to be located in the driveway. 15. Revise construction note 5. Delete the reference to the city standard. 16. Fire protection services in this area are provided by the Carlsbad Fire Department. Each lot will be required to install a 1" water service and a 1" water meter to serve each residential fire sprinkler system. Fire Protection Services can be reached at 1635 Faraday Ave. or by phone at (760) 602- 4665. 17. Show all fire hydrants within 300' ofthe project boundary. 18. Show the existing driveways to the north ofthe project on Venado Street and across the street from the project on Venado Street. 19. Show Del Rio Court on Esfera Street. 20. Maintain the corner sight distance requirement of the city landscape manual. No landscape elements over 30" in height are allowed in this zone from a point 25' along the curb face from the BCR of Esfara Street to a point 25' along the curb fact from the ECR on Venado Street. The proposed fill slope within this area needs to be revised to meet this standard. 21. Show the construction of sidewalk along Venado Street from the ECR to the existing driveway to the northwest. ATTACHMENT "1" I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES. p^Tjz -7/-Zi/iZ APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER APPLICANT OR APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE BY: A-ti^/iZx CJ DATE: RECEIVED BY DATE: P-21 Page 3 of 6 Revised 07/10 8 09 ^/H—SmO LIMA PM 20982 ROS 12915 SAN DCGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S HAP 223-05 I 1" = 400' J a/05/13 • — MGC CVL A .NO r JbiKS KK mami mwmi curm cso UtJO sm* srtr « mnn snsf-* m X ft Oi KOBB sunt* srast 04 ssa srasB II SS37 u 1007 1* CTRL#10293 NSP NSP CARLSBAO TCT NO 08-03 LA COSTA yam SQUARE - REStDENtlAL 2* CTRLf10292 NSP CARLSBAO TCT NO 01-09 LA COSTA TOWN SQUARE - COMERQAL 3* CTRL|10444 NSP CARLSBAO TCT NO 12-05 LA COSTA RESIDENTIAL J 09 I* CONDO SHADY HOLLOW-PHASE IE DOC78-82643 (SEE SHT 3) 2* CONDO SHADY HOLLOW-PHASE Ht DOC78-82644 (SEE SHTS) 3» CONDO „ SHADY HOLLOW-PHASE IZ DOC78-82645 (SEE SHT 4) O o t <n N N e SAN DIEGO COUNTY USESSQirS MAP BQbK-2a3 PAGE 20 SHT I 0F4 THSMAPWASmffABBDrcRASSESSMBfTPUBPOSESOHLT. NOt«gUTYB ASSlWa)FOHTI£ ACCURACY Cf THE OATA SCWK ASSESSOR^ARCBLS MAT m COMPLY WITH VXH. SUBOMSCM OR BULOtC OROMANCE& 223-20 SHT 1 OF 4 1"=400' ® 9/25/02 JGRO y CHANGES MAP 7950 - CARLSBAD TRACT NO 72-20 UNIT NO 3 tlK OLD NEW^ rn CUT i~ts ; S3 / 77 1377 1 16 7B CANC I 7S 37^ /<& 79 /s 73 327 ^*a: 73 .923 223-20 SHT 2 NOTE: EACH SUB I.D. INCLUDES AN UND. 1/46 INT. IN COMMON AREA CONDOMINI UM SHADY HOLLOW- PHASE I DOC 77-516487 MAP 7950 - CARLSBAD TCT 72-20 UNIT NQ3-L0TS 4878,486 •AN Ditto COUNTY MOCMOrt NAP 111223 Pt20-SHT 2 MAPPED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY § E ASSESSMENT PAR. NUMBER 223 - 200-15 SUB ID-foQ- NOTE: EACH SUB I D. INCLUDES AN UND. 1/32 INT. IN COMMON AREA ASSESSMENT PAR. NUMBER 223 -200-16 SUB LD-ETJ-t^ NOTE: EACH SUB I.D. INCLUDES AN UND. 1/26 I NT. I N COMMON AREA 223-20 SHT 3 NO SCALE LEVANTE ST CONDOMINIUMS ,, , OT AAQ SHADY HOLLOW-PHASE II-LOT 489 SHADY "HOLSW-PHASE 111-LOT 490 DOC 78—82644 MAP 7950-CARLSBAD TCT 72-20 UNIT NO 3-LOTS 489A490 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSORS MAP BO0X223PA6E *e MAPPED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY SHT 3 I ( 223-20 SHT 4 S^LE ASSESSMENT PAR. NUMBER 223 -200-32 SUB I .0.1511-1371 NOTE: EACH SUB I.D. INCLUDES AN UND. 1/47 INT. IN COMMON AREA SAN DIEGO COUNTV ASSESSORS MAP BO0K.223PAGE 2P "HAPPED FOR ASSESSMFNT PURPOSES ONLY SHT 4 CONDOMINIUM SHADY HOLLOW-PHASE DOC 78- 82645 MAP 7950-CARLSBAD TCT 72-20 UNIT NO 3-L0TS 49IA492 I «n 01 SHT. 2 223-24 SAN DtEGO COUNTY ASSESSORS MAP B00K223. PAGE. 2.4 'MAP 7950 - CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20 UNIT 395-H>^H22-H27. HHl-HHS 1 I* e I CHANCES A Eaciaiirsiii Ml III IITI HH HH HH HH mill HH Hi BH HH HH HH HH HH HH HH HH HH HH mi HH HH HH HH HH HH HH HI HH HH HH mn HH ••1 HH HH HH HH HH HH HH HH 3 - LOTS 338-3m. 223-25 I"* 100' SAN OIEGO COUNTY ASSESSORS MAP BOOKZ23PAGE. MAP 7950 - CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20 UNIT NO.3 - LOTS 413-421, 478-484 » - OPEN SPACE ESMT. SUBJECT TO SPECIAL USE PERMIT I 223-28 SHT 2 OF 2 I"- 100' I CHANGES J 7! SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSORS MAP B00K223.PAGE 28 MAPPED F(^R ASSESSMENT PllRPcSCS ONLV SHT 2 OF 2 MAP 8583 - CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 76-3