HomeMy WebLinkAboutPCD/GPC 90-13; Vista/Carlsbad Sewer Interceptor; Planning Comm Determ/Gen Plan Consis (PCD/GPC) (3)STATE OF CALIFORNIA W ^T PETE WILSON, Governor
GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH
1400 TENTH STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
Apr 29, 1991
ANNE HYSONG
CITY OF CARLSBAD
2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92009
Subject: VZSTA CARLSBA. SEWEK INTERCEPTOR -PCD/GPC 90-13/COP 90-3
SCH # 91031109
Dear ANNE HYSONG:
The State Clearinghouse -fitted the above
document to selected state agencies for «v« Thls letter _
closed and none of ^ state agencies have clearlnghouse review
JSSS^S" ^fdSft^nviSent 1 documents, pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act.
Sincerely
Assistance
City of Carlsbad
January 7, 1991
Planning Department
California Coastal Commission
Mr. Paul Webb
1333 Cam/no del Rio South, Suite, 125
San Diego, Ca. 92108
SUBJECT: VISTA CARLSBAD SEWER INTERCEPTOR PHASE III
Dear Paul:
We briefly discussed the subject public works project on the telephone a few weeks ago. The
project consists of the replacement of a sewer interceptor through downtown Carlsbad between
Buena Vista and Agua Hedionda Lagoons in Local Facilities Management Zone 1. The project
as proposed will be constructed completely within and under existing street and railroad rights
of way parallel to the existing interceptor and therefore will not encroach into any undisturbed
sensitive resource areas. Trench grading is required to bury the new sewer lines which are
required by the Growth Management Ordinance and the Local Facilities Management Plan for
Zone 1.
During our conversation, you indicated that a Coastal Development Permit will be required based
on the information supplied at that time. The Planning Department is requesting that you
reconsider this determination in the light of the review of more detailed project information. To
assist you in your review, I have enclosed plans for the new interceptor along with the following
information regarding the project:
The project is not growth inducing since the size of the interceptor is determined by the
projected demand for sewer service through buildout, and the demand projections are
based on existing General Plan density designations for the remaining undeveloped areas
within Zone 1.
2. The temporary construction impacts including noise and dust generation and traffic will
be minimized by standard mitigation measures imposed by the required grading permit.
3. Trench grading to accommodate the underground sewer interceptor will end at the
approximate boundary of the Agua Hedionda floodplain within the railroad right of way;
therefore, construction impacts to the Lagoon should be minimal.
Please call me if any additional information is needed. Thank you for your consideration.
S/m?ere/y,
1.
ANNE HYSOM
Assistant Plan,
c: Robert Green
Don Neu
Gary Kellison
Erin Letsch
File Copy
2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-4859 • (619) 438-1161
January 4, 1990
TO: Jim Davis, Associate Engineer
FROM: Gary Kellison, Associate Engineer
VISTA/CARLSBAD INTERCEPTOR, PCD/GPC 90-13, PROJECT NO. 3182
Attached is an updated print of the plans that you reviewed in your 12-13-90 transmittal,
which is also attached. Land Use Review Issue Nos. 1,2 and 5 are corrections that are
resolved by the new plans. The following issues are still to be resolved:
3. Gas line conflict from Sta. 69+53 to 73+40.
I've forwarded the plans to SDG&E for their review of this area as well as a portion of the
sewer main in Chestnut Avenue that has conflicts with existing natural gas lines.
Ultimately, the issue will be resolved by either adjusting the location of the sewer
interceptor or coordinating with San Diego Gas & Electric to move their lines during the
sewer construction.
4. Existing 8" sewer at Grand Ave. Sta. 79+10 not shown in profile.
The City's design consultant will add this to the plans and resubmit.
6. Details at northern end of Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor.
The force main that ties into the manhole at the northern terminus of the project (Sta.
117+24.34) consists of two 16" dia. pipes. The design consultant will add this to the
profile portion of the plans and resubmit.
7. Oak Avenue versus Grand Avenue route selection.
The existing Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor is either 27 or 36" dia. RCP in Grand Avenue. The
December 1987 Sewer Master Plan calls for 30" and 48" dia. pipes on the assumption that
the old interceptor would require replacement when the additional capacity is needed.
Because the original interceptor is in excellent shape and shows no corrosion, it was
possible to design a parallel line system that would be much easier to build. It would be
very difficult to replace the existing Vista/Carlsbad line with a larger diameter because the
central business storm drain was constructed across its path on Grand Avenue.
January 4, 1991
VISTA/CARLSBAD INTERCEPTOR
Page 2
The Sewer Master Plan was not intended to specify exact routes for expansion of future
lines. Your question of whether the Oak Avenue route bypasses enough sewer connections
in the downtown business district to cause a future capacity problem is valid. However,
the sewer mains in that area of downtown are too deep to connect directly to either the
old or new interceptor. Those mains drain to the Home Plant Pump Station. The new
Home Plant force main will dump into the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor at the intersection
of Laguna Drive and Jefferson Street. This is upstream of where the interceptors' routes
diverge, and the downtown flow can be balanced in the two pipes at this location.
If more information about the City's existing sewage system is needed, either Louie
Montanez or Dexter Wilson can provide it.
Hopefully, this memo clears up the major engineering issues related to the GPC application.
Some purely technical issues, such as interfering gas lines, remain. However, they are
being resolved in the plan check process, and should not be an impediment to issuance of
a GPC finding.
GARY KELLISON
Project Manager
GKrjkb
c: Municipal Projects Manager
Sanitation Supervisor
Project Planner, Anne Hysong
J| CITY OF CARLSBAD
HTGINEERING DEPARTMENT
LAND USE REVIEW DIVISION
TO: PROJECT PLANNER A 01 /ftJJgitM DATEy
FROM: .-J/M J5arrt\ PROJECT ID ^*
VIA: PRINCIPAL OV!L
PROJECT ISSUES STATEMENT
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the c-esubniittcd project
application for completeness and/or engineering issues. The Project application is now e
wag previously found complete for the purpose of continued Engineering review. .The
project application does contain some Engineering issues or concerns which remain to be
resolved by the applicant. All Engineering issues should be fully resolved or addressed
prior to resubmittal of the project for ottr review. The outstanding Engineering issues or
concerns are as follows: / . / / _
- ' '- " '- " '
f,g> &(s£>r-* /1 r^fptn<$/£?•{-^
"7 * U/tff d
LL. 1 7 s&PZc,?- Adji.,rY fZtr/z c.,-rf
•^1^The above noted issues are of normal concern. These concerns may be transmitted
to the applicant without benefit of a project meeting.
The above noted issues are of serious concern or of a sensitive nature. It is
suggested that a meeting be held with the applicant and the following Engineering
Staff members to discuss our concerns with the project: _
Also attached is a redlined check print of the site plan. This plan should be given
to the applicant for corrections and changes as noted. Please have the applicant
return the redlined print with the corrected site plan to assist us in our continued
review.