HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.10.4; CARLSBAD POINTE LOTS 10-17; Engineering ApplicationS 'PERMIT No.PE2,/O,1/
plication for Grading Permit (letter code + number
CITY OF CARLSBAD Llot
PUBLIC WORKS & BUILDING DEPARTMENT S=subdivision
1200 Elm Avenue
729-1181
- - fpI ,
FOR APPLICANT TO Fill IN
Site Addes
tP t (30 Surety Bond Bond No.
Legal Description Map No.
r_/0_-/7_e,1,y ale c Id
Surety Company
_,ø_/52
Subdivision Name
9q4_
Surety Address
Owner Phone
,//4, 106-
Date Filed Rec'd by
Owner's Address
--5-- 60,5- LLI5
Cash deposit Rec'd by Date filed
$
Plans by Civil Eng),neer R.C.E. The following documents are required and shal
become a part of the grading permit when they
are approved.
plans Specifications
,Soil report Vicinity map
Drainage structures ,Retaining walls
Compaction report Other
Address Phone
-/56 _Grading
Soil Engeer R.C.E. Phone
.
;rading Contractor Phone
ddress Check if supervised
grading -'5
SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE
A PART OF THIS PERMIT
'arty jsponsible for overall supervision
I. Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 AM to
'roposed use of grade site 5:00 PM, Monday-Friday.
Haul routes are to be approved by City
lumber of cubic yards
Cut Fill import Waste
Engineer.
Adequate provisions shall be made for
erosion and siltation control.
All slopes shall be planted per direction I -_---------- of Parks & Recreation Director. Total
V P -A1- Compacted fills (yes or no)
45-06 0 Proposed Schedule of Start Finish
Operations (dates) Lj
I hereby acknowledge that I have read the applica-
tion
tion and state that the information I have provide
is correct and agree to comply with all City
ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and
grading, and the provisions and conditions of any
permit issued pursuant to this application.
Signature of Permittee
Owner I
Pl
I
anting & drainage
INSPECTION INSPECTOR'S DATE SIGNATURE
Ground preparation
Rough grading
Compaction report
Final certification rec'd. L
Grading permit fee $ 7f C) 46,00 =fgj~~67 work compieTea
Surety bond released
Permit Validation
by/4/c1 Date 6 7'4 7
Permit Expiration Date _tZy4-7S
THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED BY SIGNATURE IS A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED
THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD
vi
PFE 'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT.-ASSESSMENT FORM :
Receipt. No._383 EIA NO.___
Date:
Name of Applicant: Naimco Corporation do Donald Agatep
Addre:; P.O. _Box 590, Carlsbad, Ca, 92008
Permit Appl 'ieü Fr ; Grading Permit,..
Case Nos.:.
Location of Proposed Activity: East side of the 209 .bJock..qf Ocean St.,'
Carlsbad, Calif., Lots 10-17 inclusive, Granville Park, Mapa82, recorded Feb. 213
1924, and also 1iawñ as Assessor Parcel 203-022-10
BACKGROUND.INFORMATION
1.. Give a brief description of the proposed activity (attach
any preliminary development plans). S
Construction of 3 four-bedroom and 3 three-bedroom single family residences
and 2 duplexes. Each duplex unit will have three bedrooms. The building
sites vary in size between 5000 and 6900 sq. ft. each.
= 2. Describe the activity area, including distinguishing
natural and manmade characteristics; lso provide precise
slope analysis when appropriate.
The subject site is an irregular shaped parcel Of land with the eastern portion
nearly level and the rest of the site sloping .approximately 2 towards the wet
and northwest. The topographical features of the site are all natural in origin.
660 cu. yds. of cut and 550 cu. yds. of fill will be required to ready theo eight
building sites for Construction.
.5
.5
3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into
the esign and/or operation of the project.
-see attached sheet specthg water and energy facilities-
..
EN' IRONMENTAL . IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM
II. Environmental Impact Analysis...
Answer the-following questions.. by placing a cheek in the appropriate
space. . . .
Yes. No
Could the project.significarftly change present land uses
in the Vicinity of the activity? . . . S X
Could the activity afFet the use of a. recreational . . . .
area, or area of important aesthetic value? . . X *
3 Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood? . ., X
Could the activity result in the displacement of
community residents? . . .
X
Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity.
. . area unique, that is, not found in other par.ts of the
County, State, or nation? . . .
6. Could the activity sighificantly affect a historical or
archaelogical site or .it setting?
7 .
.
Coitid the activity significantly affect the potential
. use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural res -
ource?
.
. . .
. S.
• . . . S. X
Does the activity area serve as habitat, food source
nesting place, source of water, etc. for rare or endangered
wildlife orfi.sh species? . . . . .
0
X
Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildli-fe or . plant life?
.10. Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the
activity-area?. .
.,
. • .
11. Could the activity change existing features of any.of
the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? . •
.
U. Could the activity change eisting features of any of
the City's beaches?
Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination
•
. of agricultural lands? ..
.• .
.• . . S -
X.
_____
Could the. activity serve to encourage development of
..presently undeveloped areas or intensify developmeht
0 .
• .
S . of already developed areas?
WilT the activ,ty require a variance, from established environmental
• standards (air, water, noise, -etc)'? •: ., . '' ,
,•
_____
• Will the activity require certification, authorization or issuance . . . .
of apermit by any, local, State or Federal environmental control
• * agency? . . . . . .
- 17. Will the activity require issuance of a varianc:e or conditional .
use nermit by the City? '• .. . . . . x
18. Will the activity involve..-.th 'ppltction, use, or disposal of :.
potentially hazardous materials? ' . ' . ..
X
19. Will the activity ihvolve construction of facilities i,na- flood
• 'plain? . . .
20. Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of x 25 percent or greater? . . •:'
21. Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the
• area of an active fault?
. . . . X
.22. Could the activity result in the generation of significant . • amounts of noise?
Could the activity result ij. the generation of significant
amounts, of dust? . . . . X *
Will the activity involve the burning ofbrush, trees, or ' ' • other materials? X
25. Could the activity result in a significant change:in the
quality of any portion of the region's air or--Water resources? . x . (Should note surface, ground water,off-shore). . • . _____ _____
26. Will there be a significant change to existing land form? . • , X
(a) indicate estimated grading to be done' in cubic yards. 660 . .t
•
•
550. cu. Ycis.' fill
percentage of alteration to the present land form.
• maximum height of cut or fill slopes. ' • 3
.27; Will the activity resultin substantial increases in the use of utilities,
sewers, drains or streets? ' • • - X *
III. State of No Significant Environmental Effects • • • •
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section II but you.
think the activitywill have no significant environmental effects, indicate your
reasons below: •
. : -
• * see at+,ached sheet for Environmental Impact Analysis Comments • : ••
A
. .
IV: Comnints or Elaboratibns to Any of the Questions. in Section, II. . .
(If additional space is.-needed for answering any questions, attach additional.
sheets as may be needed.) ..
Sign at uir Z
(Person c 1pleting report)
Date Signed: ° --
Conclusions (To be completed by the Pl.nning Director). Place a check
in the appropriate box.. .
() Further information is required.
(/( It has been determtned that the project will not have significant
environmental effects. ( ) Youmust submit a preliminary environmental
impact statement by the following date _. ( ) You
should make an appointment with the Planning Director to discuss
further processing of your project, in accordance with Chapter 19.04
of the Municipal Code.
S • S '5
DATE RECEIVED: .. S • . S
BY:_____ • S
Planning Director, or,
Revised 713/74-
FORM PLANNING 40 . 55
• S S
•
• S
. . Discussion '
The subject site to be graded is approximately one acre. A total of 660 yards '
of cut and 350 yards of fill is proposed. This is equivalent to less than 6"
of excavation over the, entire site. The lot 'is fairly flat now and will be
fairly flat when the project is' finished; the natural slope will be altered
only slightly. A short retaining wall, 'less than 2' high, will bisect the
property. This will allow pads on the east side of the wall to be approx-
imately 2.5 to 3 higher than pads west of the retaining wall. Slopes are
fairly flat. Most are 5 to 1 or flatter. A.-few slopes are approximately 3 to
1 but they are less than 2 feet high. It appears that the site has been graded
before. There is no significant vegetation on the'site. A few eucalyptus ' S
trees exist' but they are in .poor condition. It appears obvious that this
grading project could not adversely affect the environment. '
Recommendation ' • '
It is recommended that this project be found to be, exempt from CE9A per Section
15060 of the State EIR Guidelines (copy attached).
Justification
The grading proposed is minimal, a total of 660 yards over the entire area.
The change to the natural topography will be slight. The proposed grading
will cause no drainage' problems.
No steep or high slopes will result from the grading, thus erosion and
slope failure will not be problems.
The property contains no structures, significant vegetation, or unique
natural features that would be 'impacted.
Section 18060 of the State EIR Guidelines clearly exempts such projects:
"Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that
the, activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment,
the activity is not covered by the requirements set forth in CEQA,. and
these guidelines concerning the evaluation of projects, and the preparation
and review of environmental documents do'not apply." This is such a ,
project because of the four previously stated reasons.
The discussion, recommendation, and justification was prepared by Don.L. Rose, '.
Associate Planner, City of Carlsbad, on March 8, 1978. This is a result of
examination of the grading plans, the EIA,on-site investigation, and dis-
cussion with the current development section of the Engineering Department,
City of Carlsbad.
I declare that I have examined the information for the subject project as sub-
mitted by the applicant and planning department staff. On the basis of all
the information, It is my determination that there is no possibility of this
project having a signifiáant impact on the environment and is therefore exempt
from C.E.Q.A and Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code pursuant to Section
18060 of the State EIR Guidelines.
DATE
- Yames C Hagan /
Planning Director ,
•
Nainco Corporation EIA. NO._______
II Environmental Impact Analysis-.Comments
2. The subject property is'currently vacant. The proposed one and two-story
residential units will be similar in height and bulk to the existing structures
in the immediate area.
]14.The subject property is in the City of Carlsbad's infill area as designated
by Carlsbad's Sewer Allocation Plan and the California Coastal Commission.
16.The property site is in the California Coastal Zone and the proposed project
received a Coastal Permit (F6190) on October 21, 3977.
.No significant long term noise impacts will occur as 'a result of this project.
Short term ioise impacts will occur during the grading and construction phases of the proposed project.
23.In the long term no significant âmo.imof dust will be generated by the project.
c In the short term dust will be generated during the grading of the property site.
27-No significant increase in the use, of utilit1esw1U occur as a result of the
addition of 10 EDUto the existing sewer system. The. project will provide
sidewalks , curbs and gutters on the east side, of Ocean 'St. and on the west
iside of Garfield St..
Note: The applicant has received a Ministerial Exemption from the requirements.
of the Carlsbad Environmental-Protection Ordinance ,of 3972 in Sept. 19779 - for the proposed development of 10 residential units,