The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPE 2.83.49; LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT 1 LOT 136; Engineering Application0 Application for Grading Permit 035-3 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPAR-TIVIENT AA:~'7- 1200 Elm Avenue 438-5541 Building Permit Plan Check No. -93 - Z-93.4-9 VajiA nance t,.) - 911P Depar 'eri FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN ed ress Sit d Surety Company a ZAwd"No Am egal escription 4.4 C,0.577-4' Map No. - 01 --A~-, / 6800 Spegy Address Jjr W00,01,&*Q -ttILLS ~CA,? S6.bdivisi I on NaTe~ - Date Filed Recd by r,,W-4 Owner Phone VAe~, g Iq Cash d Wit R 'd b y filed PF j Ke 1$1 13,91 , 'L 1~i 114 Owner's Address op— Ay Thefollowing documents are required and shall .- become a part 6 f- theqgrading permit when -they are arpp(o ~ a. Wd kf""-~Gracling plans — Specif ications Soil report — Geologic Report Drainage structures Other Plans by Civil Enyier k. R.C.E. 49X CIOZZ~ 3130 Address Phone WY101 49.,r4 # Compaction report Soil Engineer R.C.E. Phone A,LF0tjSQ 3/ IV&IS a844..P 7 q, 0 1 Grading Contractor Phone SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE A PART OF THIS PERMIT Address 1. Aut ' horized h - ours of operation: 7:60 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday. Party4PSponsible for oyerall supervision 2_. Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. 4,/ -1475VIE (V,*< Pro posed use, of grade ske Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation Number of cubic yards control. Cut Fill Import Waste, All slopes shall be. planted perCity Code. 6,00 ;z Proposed Schedule of Start. Finish All fills to be compacted to at7lea~t 90% of optimum Operations (dates) density unless noted otherwise. I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with all City ordinar~ces and State laws regulating excavating and gradin ~91 Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: and the provisions and.conditions of any permit issued pursuant to 0 REGULAR GRAbING' w City inspector will make inspections this application. li>ted below. V15ONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall Signature of Permittee observe work, coord(nate tests, make ~reports'. Ov%~ner or authorized agent INSPECTION DATE INSP-SIGNATURE Initial - site prep. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - Date. 884- Rough - prior to drains Final -,slopes planted E I ALog No. By ja Compaction reports rec'd; Grading perm.it flee $ RO PI an check fee, $ 20 Private engr. cert. reed. Permit Issu4d 1P I 10. ge 75 7A' d— Uy UOLU, Copies: White-Office; Green-Building; Permit Expiration Date A:g ~XOA(1-4 Agom g7jo Ago Yellow-inspector; Pi-Kk-) rmit e;: Goldenrod-Finance THIS FORM WHEN P ROPERLY VALIDATED IS A PERMIT T31 DO THE WOR9 DE 111) THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD County of San Diego DepartmOt of Planning and Land fe 9150 Chesapeake Drive San Diego, CA 92123 565-5920 (Zenith 1.0898) 325 South Mefrose Drive Vista, CA 92083 758-6111 (Zenith 7-2001) 200* - L East Main El Cajon, CA 92020 0 579-4511 (Zenith 7-1398). Projecz Location V15Pt9tA P4AC4E Name o . f Permictee elZ Z04 TA 9-Cj 6ee CA& 1- 5 &4D Grading Permit Ia.. 40r- /56 This report fare for a *~%inoe IraAing project is to be comipliied 3Lnd signed by the Registered Civi , L Engineer (or Architect) who has been designated on the Grading Plan inid, Permit as the Engineer who will furnish the compaction report for work authorized by a grading permit issued by the Department of Planning and Lard Use. The intent of the format is to provide information w the Department of Planning and , , Land Use as 'to jr3ding compliance with the approved Grading Plan and Permit. Where the questions below -refer to Location, - configuration or quantity of cut aWor fill ireas, it is understood that your response will not ior-nally be based on an actuaL land survey or detailed earthwork quantity calcuLatiahs. It should be noted-i however, that the Department is particularly concerned where there are possible infractions rWith respect to over- teeponed slopes. encroachments of required setbacks, uncompacted fills placed. or where the quantity of fill laced differs substantiilly from that authorized. The Department of Planning and Land, Use requires that all fills authorized by a Grading,'Permit be compacted to a aininum Of M of maximuis density with the exception that not nor* than IVI of-uncompact~ and untested ftlls may be dispersed over the land parcel. The need to compact all fills that are beyond the present limits of the present proposed construction is to insure that future proposed construction of room additions or swimming 2oots or similar structures will not require that uncomimcted fills be removed or recompacted. or that extensive foundation work be installed. Compaction reports will not be accepted unless this form is completed and signed by the registered person. A. COMPATIBILITY WITH CRADDS PLAM AND PERMIT Was the compacted f ill placed only in the approximate locations designated on the grading Yes 0/ S. plan as areas to be filled? " Did the quantity of fill material placed approxizarely conform to the,grading pLan? Yes b/ No Did the too of fill'i or the top of cut appear to meet the prescribed property Line setback Yes Lo~ No (1.51 for fill; ;.01 far cuts)? 4. Were the finished fill slopes equal to or less than 2 hari--outal to L vertical? Yes V/ No— S. If the fill zatertat was obtained by cuts on the site, were the cuts made in' the proper Yes 40 Location and to the proper slope approximately as shown on the approved. grading plan? 6. Were brow ditches constructed approximately &s.shown on the grading plan? Yes— No S. LOCATIORAND MOUW, OF CWACTIOV TESTS 1. Hav*.you attached a sketft arA.data showing the location and relative elevation for III Yes No compaction tests? — Was a coaWtion test made, so that there is at least one test in each, 2' thick len2 of Yes go compacted mstarlal? 3. AS indicated by inspections. observatiom and compaction test results, was the fill.. Yes NO . excluaing the top l.,0% compacted to at least 90% of maximm dry density? C. QUALM OF FILL COMPACTION OPEUTIO2.4 I_ Was the ares, to receive fill properly prepared in terms of brush removal. benching.. Yesov, *40 watting. removal of nonc*apacted fill Or debris and retated'items? rgr AC0tAAX5 was-all detrimentally ex;mmive sail placed in the fill at 3' or -acre below finish grade? Yes I/ No 3- Hz%-* you attached a :*;y of your curve showing -the relationshi-it betweenoptimun moisture Yes A,-'- ~,-O_ . content. And maximLa donsitv? 4.. lias all =teriaL.used is .ill (earth. rocks. gravel) smaller than 1:" in. si:e.; Are all 2rwm of the, tit; suitable for sup rz. of *trucru.-W Yes'A po Na a. %are At existi-Il MIS in tho sits ricomeac:ad la iccord4nce with the provisions at the.- Yes No ;r2ding 121L .-~J: 1tv. . . . . . . . . . . =7 -7