The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPE 2.84.73; PALISADES; Engineering ApplicationApplication for Grading Pe PE NO. 9-4, 7.3 0 rmit CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm Avenue PI,V6. NO, -2 4 9. -4-' 438-5541 Valid~tion by Finance -1,'10~000 MC Building Perrhit'Plan Check No. B5 Tl 0'00 % FOR APPLICANT TO FI LL IN Site Address Weu Ave- ekai"40*0 Surety Company- Bond No. Lega escripgon Map No. 110 1pf 'Poe- WT 17, fboct? Surety Address IM Subdivision Name ?A & I/A V15'17 Date Filed Rec'd by Owner _T Phone C Cash dep Rer'd by Date filed Owner's Addr2§s 1?4_~ L) The following documents are required and shall become a part of the grading permit when they are approved. I`/ Grading plans Specifications Soil report Geologic Report Drainage structures Other Compaction report n r Plans by Qiv E gi e R.C.E. 0 Address ,7g, OW1 to ;AP"hone 4;~ [- Va Soil Engip - efi r R.C.E. Phone if 4:~F,a bo .96 *z4 Grading Contractor Phone -5ii k*1 0A6 SPECIAL CONDITION . S WHICH ARE MADE A PART OFTHIS PERMIT Address ra:fox UWA 1 . Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday. Party relponsiple,for overaltiopervision Im n Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. Proposequse of grade she kp!~ygf~T-4 Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation co ntrol. Number of cubic~yards Cut Fil I I Import Waste All slopes shall be planted.per City Code. Proposed Schedule of Start i_&,~ Finishg_6~ Operations (dates) All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimurn density unless noted otherwise. I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct.and agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, and the provisionsand conditi~ f this application. Signature of Permittee . Jan~ permit. issyed_Rursuant to Owner or authorized agent 'I _?WK1_1P031_ Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: Fy_]~R G U LAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections sl sted below. C CONTROLLED GRADING - Private: grading engineer shall C observe work,. coordinate tests, make reports. INSPECTION DATE~ INSP. SIGNATURE Initial - site prep. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - P"A KhrZf,&7rN6 V95C. Dat OgNo. By !Rough - prior to drains Final - slopes plainted Compaction reports rec'd., I Grading permit fee Plan check fee $ 4W 4:Vn Private engr. cert: rec'd. I Permit lssue,,d)~ A j I- -I:::- - a C::~- by Date _j Copies: White.-Office; Greeh-Building; Permit Expiration Date 0 - g5 Yellow-Inspector; PinktPermittee; Goldenrod-Finance THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED ISA PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD 0 1 E60 ve is DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND LAND USE CODES DIVISION San Die Office North County Office 5201 Ruff in Road, Suite 83 334 Via Vera Cruz RETURN TO: San Diego, CA 92123 San Marcos, CA 92069 565-5920 741-4236 Project Location A,:~.46* wwors Name of Permittee R5'04 VfVF-L0'1 2MflT Grading Permit No.. -7 This report form for a 'hinor" grading project is to be completed and signed by the Registered Civil Engineer (or Architect) who has been designated on the Grading Plan and Permit as the Engineer who will furnish the compaction report for work authorized by a grading. permit issued by the Department of Planning and Land Use. The intent of the -format is to provide information to the Department of Planning and Land Use as to grading compliance with the approved Grading Plan and,Permit. Where the questions below refer to location, configuration or quantity of cut and/or fill areas, it is understood that your response will not normally be based on an actual land survey or detailed earthw.ork quantity calculations. -It should be noted, however, that the Department is particularly concerned where there are possible infractions with respect to over- steepened slopes, encroachments of required setbacks ' uncompacted fills placed, or where the quantity of fill placed differs substantially from that authorized. The Department -of Planning and land Use requires that all fills authorized by a Grading Permit be compacted to a minimum of 90A of maximum density with the exception that not more than 12" of uncompacted and untested fills may be dispersed over the land parcel. The need to compact all fills that are beyond the present limits of the present proposed construction is to insure that future proposed construction of room additions or swimming pools or similar structures will not require that uncompacted fills be removed or recompacted, or that extensive foundation work be installed. Compaction reports will not be accepted unless this form is completed and signed by the registered person. COMPATIBILITY WITH GRADING PLAN AND PERMIT Was the compacted fill placed only in the approximate locations designated on the grading Yes / No—plan as areas to be filled? Did the quantity of fill material placed approximately conform to the grading plan? Yes —V-" No- 5. bid the toe of fill or the top of cut appear to meet the prescribed property line setback, Yes v" No— (l.S1 for fill.~ 3.01 for cuts)? Y", Were the f inished f ill slopes equal to or less than 2 horizontal to 1 vertical.?-` Ye S. If the fill material was obtained by cuts on the site, were the cuts madej'n' 'the' ;.prqpe;r,,-..,j . No location and to the proper slope approximately as shown on the approved giad'ing,'plan? — 6. Were brow ditches constructed approximately as shown on the grading pla. n? Yes -No LOCATION AND AMOUNT OF COMPACTION TESTS 1. Have you attached a sketch and data showing the location and relative eIeVaiioTft:for all Y es No— .Y comDaction tests? Was a compaction test made so that there is at least one test in each 21 thick-1 ens of Yes .;0 commacted material? S. As indicated by inspections, observations and compaction test results, was the fill, Yes--/ No excluding the top 1.01, compacted,to at least 90% of maximum dry density? — QUALITY OF FILL COMPACTION OPERATION Was the area to receive fi,ll properly prepared in terms of brash removal, benching, Yes V1 No wetting, removal of noncompacted fill or debris and'related items? Was all detrimentally epa-~. soil placed in the fill at 31 or more below finish grade? Yes No- Yes V/ Have you attached a coc of your curve showing.the relat;onship between optimum moisture y ~:O content and maximum density? .1. :-~as all material used as fill (earth, rocks. gravel) smaller than I:" in size? Yes V, ~;:c_ Ar e a. 11 areas of the fill SuLtable f3i' SUDDOrt Of SCr'1C-u-e57 es V/ ,;er e -1, exis-:ing fills )n the sire recomnacted in accordance with ~Ihe rrovisicns of -he % =s ,ra~;ng ordinance.' L D. STATISTICAL DATA . . ,9-4 -7 Dates the grading work-was performed: Dates your representative was on site and number of hours. on site for each date, and name of representative. 'o, - 0 1-6, 1-1 1-11 - ?,~ k-9-11 441 r~_l E. AS-BUILT DATA If the fill placement a in accordance with the approved grading plan, did you notify Yes No 'I the permittee to o=~n ~appo for deviation from the plan before proceeding with additional fill placement? 2. If the approved grading Plan d eflect the actual location,. depth and type of fill, Yes No !0,9~~t r have you submitted for review and.approval an as-built plan? RBMKS: I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the information provided in this certification- is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature _"~z Date (To be sign '-find dated by g istered Engineer or Architect) ~6f -:~ 17 Regis 7on or Certific t7in Number Address qk)y 16 1 CM rM Telephone Number L5 I — 1,~ W rn W. No. 32728 ~ 44, — 'g-zi-06