The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPE 2.84.85; BALLATORE APARTMENTS; Engineering ApplicationBuilding Permit Plan Check No, •- 0 Application for Grading Permit 0 PE No.2.84* 85 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm Avenue '438-5541 i- 2-52--\ Finance 1,00 Sit' 00 nc Qo IL FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN Site Address 31_714sJ331 4citc,iAVE Surety Company Bond No. Legal Description Lo B 1 FL 6F r4L%cc Map No. i&o.3 Surety Address Subdivision Name Date Filed // Rec'd by Owner iôSE4't4 L&J.TOI.E Phone (c,)4a7- 7Z,Lf Cash deposit / Rec'd by Date filed $ Owner's-Address I?-'1.S' 37r[E -AI'.LY'o?I f-0I4p4 oi''1' The following documents are required and shall become a part ' of the grading permit when they are approved. Grading plans Specifications Soil report Geologic Report Drainage structures ____ Other Compaction report Plans-by Civil ngineer R.C.E. tK t4A Ni, A t'i4 2.55 Address Ph)ne 'j-c Cii Zr.-! 1Ec-c.c- Soil Engineer R.C.E. PIoe ii. L a'+t3 '32.2-O C'1) 741-o533> Grading Contractor Phone SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE A PART OF THIS PERMIT Address Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday• Friday. Party responsible for overall supervision M\(. ARMA 2. Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. Proposed use of grade sit A 10 Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation control. Number of cubic yards Cut Fill Import Waste 9 All slopes shall be planted per City Code. 1500 1So0 Proposed Schedule of Operations (dates) Start Finish 5.All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum density unless noted otherwise. I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, and the provisions and an suant to this appli ti caon. (1 Signature of Permittee - .j.PJJ...ZI5&'JLt CONTROLLED Owner or authorized 2~~ ecuet::Fg ~p e:44 ( Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: REGULAR GRADING - City inspectorwill make inspections ,listed below. GRADING - Private grading engineer shall ' observe work, coordinate tests, make reports. INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE Initial . site prep. 7// 0% 4&Z _, VZ ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - ElALogNo.Pcb_ ((&7 fq S Date _____________ By a.. '71A .1n_.u._i Rough - prior to drains.-/ i7//, Final - slopes planted V Compaction reports rec'd / Grading permit fe,,$ 94_— Plan check fee $ Private engr. cert. rec'd. v Permit i)(') J ( f) - by Date ' '' '' . Copies: White-Office.6ieen-Building;' (' Goldenrod-Finance Permit Expiration Date — Yellow-Inspector; Pink-Permittee THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD 'UUIlLy Vi J4II IJIcV Departnt of Planning and LaröUse 9150 Chesapeake Drive 32.5 South Melrose Drive San Diego, CA 92123 Vista, CA 92083 565-5920 (Zenith 1-0888) 158-6111 (Zenith 7.2001) 'I 1• 200 . L East Main El Cajon, CA 92020 579-4511 (Zenith 7.1398) Project Location -3/,9 4C,4C,'l. -s f Same of Permittee I3'4CI TO/r 3,4-i) Grading Permit No.. This report form for a "iinor" ;redlng project is to be completed and signed by the Registered Civil Engineer (or Architect) who has been designated on the Grading Plan and Penal; as the Engineer who will furnish the compaction report for work authorized by a grading permit issued by the Department of Planning and Land Use. The Intent of the format Is to provide Information to the Department of Planning and Land. Use as to grading compliance with the approved Grading Plan and Permit. there the questions below refer to location. configuration or quantity of cut and/or fill areas, It is understood that your response will not normally be based on an actual Land survey or detailed earthwork quantity calculations. It should be noted, however, that the Department is particularly concerned where there are possible infractions with respect to over- steepened slopes, encroachments of required setbacks, unco.psctad (ills placed,, or where the quantity of fill placed differs substantially from that authorized. The Department of Planning and Land Use requires that all fills authorized by a Grading Permit be compacted to a minimum of 901 of naximum density with the exception that not more than 12" of uncoupacted and untested fills may be dispersed over the land parcel. The need to compact all fills that are beyond the present limits of the present proposed construction Is to Insure that future proposed construction of room additions or swimming pools or similar structures will not require that wscospacted tills be removed or re cam pacted. or that extensive foundation work be Installed. Compaction reports will not be accepted unless this form is completed and signed by the registered person. A. COMPATIBILITY WITH GRJ.DL4 PLAN AND PEP..'4IT I. was the compacted fill placed only in the approximate locations designated on the grading Yes, No plan as areas to be filled? Did the quantity of fill material placed approximately conform to the grading plan? Yes No Did the toe of fill or the top of cut appear to not the prescribed property line setback Yes .40 — (1.51 for fill; 3.0' for cuts)? Yes ' Were the finished fill slopes equal to or less than 2 horizontal to 1 vertical? No_ S. If the fill material was obtained by cuts on the site, were the cuts made In the proper Yes No____ Location and to the proper slope approximately as shown on the approved grading plan? 6. Were brow ditches constructed approximately as shown on the grading plan? Yes,,_ No__ B. LOCATION AND AN(IJiT OF COMPACTION TESTS Have you attached a sketch and data Viowino the location and relative elevation for all Yes No — compaction tests? Was a compaction test made so that there is at least one test in each 2' thick lens of Yes compacted material? As indicated by Inspections, observations and compaction test results, was the fill, Yes No__, excluding the top 1.01, compacted to at least 90% of maximum dry density? C. QUALITY OF FILL COMPACTION OPERATION 1. Was the area to receive fill properly, prepared In terms of brush removal, benching, Yes No___ 4ett1ng, resoval of noncoapacted fill or debris and related 'items? 2, Was all detrimentally expansive soil placed in the fill at 3' or mare below finish grade? Yes 4o,__ 3. Have you attached a cov of Your curve showing the relationship between optimum moisture Yea No__ content and msaimi.a density? 4. Was all uterta1 used as fill (earth, rocks, gravel) sesIsr than 1" in site? Yes_ Xo S. Are all areas of the itti suttabi* for support of structures? Yes No, 6. ere rU existing fills an the site rècoapactad in accordance with the provisions of the y5_' %o rading ordinance? 9 I S 0 aTATISTICAl. DATA . 'I I. Dates the grading work was performed. 2 z?, 126.-S s- 2. Dates your representative was on site and number of hours on site for each dais, and nase of r.presentaiiv.: ?-2-7,2-1 8 --89' 3-1-85 //,4t. £,4 M - E. AS-BUILT DATA If the fill placement was not In accordance with the approved iriding plan, did you notify Yes the pernittee to obtain approval for deviation an the plan b.fore proceeding with additional fill placement? If the approved ;radlng plan does riot reflect the actual location, depth and type of fill. Yes No have you submitted for review and approval anu-built plan? '- • REMARKS: .5é 5011-5 /v'es Dcfe 3'( 74f) 27e Oc 7-; 3,/28 '/ ),47,e'it( '6V. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the Lnrf atitprovlded in thloeortification is true to the best of ay knowledge and belief. Slnature Herald R. Lkitis - Date 3 3 (To' be signed and dated by a Registered Engineer or Architect) Registration or Certification *srèsr C33220 Mdress 1525 S. Escondido Blvd., EscondLdO 3,C8. Telephone Number 619-741-0533 U L. Land DevLopm.zit 4 . .. '-' " ••