The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPE 2.85.77; MEADOWCREST; Engineering ApplicationD1 tLo1 z77 -L Application for Grading Permit CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Drive 438-3550 PE NO. CT ;-o6 Validation by Finance Department Building Permit Plan Check No, Surety Company Bond No. c'4E wc'E3 3 767 Surety Address - Date Filed Rec'd by Cash deposit Rec'd by Date filed $'20h 0a, 0 -0 -98 The following documents are required and shall become a part Grading plans Specifications V" Soil report Geologic Report Drainage structures ______ Other .1 Compaction report SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE ______________________ A PART OF THIS PERMIT Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday. Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation control. All slopes shall be planted per City "ode. All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum density unless noted otherwise. b.Cc -çip OF 2. No1c1 Wo To f'iZ-co and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to "t41didrt de Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections this application, listed below. (CONTROLLED GRADING. Privatad4 n'eçII observe work, coordinate4t1ake reprt s. 6 Signature of Permittee INSPECTION PATE INS SIG TURE Owner or authorized agent ire Initial - site prep. 4 ENV IRONMENTALLEARANCE - Cl !' Date -' —j Rough . prior to dra /- . Grading permit fee $ 4Q Plan check fee $ Compaction rep d. E IA Log No. By Finalsloeslantd ' ( Permit I Permit Expiration Date 3 (frDae 14Q A /J Copie s9rWhe; Green-Building; I) /1 / Yellow-Inspe p - ermittee Goldenrod- nance THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED ISA P RMIT TO O THE WORK DESCRIBED 04 THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SI (6LMONTH PERIOD ,, TQc-€. C7T4LL RoS FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN Site Address E,.,&J COREr. cF ALAbA k Le al Description Map No. oç ?A1?CFA_KAAFf40.154j 00 Subdivision Name -. C Owner Phone &Ac' .3 -0066 Owner's Address t'?z'(o . op. cI'2ot d9 12 Plans by Civil Engineer R.C.E :2764- Address Phone 11€)-2 g44-1 010 Soil Engine e1 R.C.E. Phone firdon 1'eertry Gradin Contractor ' , hone k,rc.i4nayt/ niLrc3ü (i) 21-Oz/4 Address I POlO Linda V,4 1 S'.t4 LO, Qjr. MorcoCA ?2t4 Party responsible for overall supervision k1t kirckrty Proposed use of grade site / RQc\ AL JP%V% efb LPT3 Number of cubic yards Cut Fill Import Waste (41W Proposed Schedule of Start Finish Operations (dates) I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws reaulatina eccavatina and oradinn _____________ of the grading permit when they are approved. ---------------------- ooVtxJcflot. CIA Eo09..EbL C 858 / t'uo 82 -01 POo)c51 : - *E: .100ic7?.Y77 RECEIPT NO: 'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To -Be Completed by APPLICANT) ,:• • CASE NO. DATE: February L. 1985 Applicant: Thé DAON Corporation Address of Applicant: 5150 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone Number: (619 931-1224 Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (i f o t h e r t h a n Applicant): I'r,. Jim Goff.,.:M'. Bill Hofman -931'-1224 ':• GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: 71 unit residential subdivision (Meadowrest) Project Location/Address: Southwest corner, of Alga Rd. an'd.Melrbse Ave. in La Costa. Assessor Parcel Number: 222 150 - 014 Zone of Subject Property: RD-M (Q) Proposed Use of Site: 71 single family detached residential housing units and recreation center. , List all other applicable applications related to this p r o j e c t s None 0 2. Describe theactiv area, including distiguishing natural and man- made characteristi -, also provide precise se analysis when appropriate. The eastern: portion of.. .the site consists of gently rolling to flat terrain covered -by a disturbed grassland community. A small south- easterly trending drainage area terminates at a manmade earthen dam. Standing water trapped by the dam currently supports a pond aquatic vegetative community. The western edge of the site rises steeply to abQut 500 ft (L) xcept in the northwestern corner of the site wher.e a lar stockpile CI earth. has been Dlaôed a1on2 AL2a. Road. 3.. DescrIbe energy conservation measures incorporate into the design• and/oroperationof the project. . . Where possible, energy-saving techniques will be included in the architectural design and the landscaping. Also, solar heating and insulation meeting State standards will be used. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. A total of 71 single family detached units are planned. Families, child- less couples, retired couples, semi-retired couples and single indiv- iduals are e•xpected to live here. Home prices would probably ..range from roughly $85,000 to $125,000, depending on square footage. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city.or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. . . . NA If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. NA If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,'.and community benefits to be derived from the project. . .. NA I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPA•ANALYSIS S Answer the following questions by placing a check in the a p p r o p r i a t e space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional s h e e t s a s necessary.:) YES .N0 Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? X Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? X Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? X Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? X Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? X Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? X Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not.found in other parts of the county, state or nation? X Could the activity significantly affect an historical or archaeological site or its settings? X Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Does the activity significantly affect the potential Use, extraction, or conservation of. a x scarce natural resource? Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? S X Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? Could the activity change existing features of S any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? X Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? S X Could the activity result in the erosion or S eliminationof agricultural lands? Could the activity serve to encourage development S of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develpp- ment of already developed äre'às? X YES . NO Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? Will the activity require certification, authoriz'a tion or tissuance of 'a permit by any local, state or .federal .environmentalcontrol agency? Will thd activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? 20.) Will the activity involve 'the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? x I. x x x Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? ' ''. . X 23') Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or 'greater? 24)' Could the activity result in the generation of ' significant amounts of noise? 25) Could the activity result in: the generation of significant amounts of dust? 26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush,' trees, or other materials? . 27) Could the activity result in, a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air' or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) 28) Will the project substantially inôr'ea'se• fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? . X X I ' ) X X X Indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards: 95,000, of which £0,000 involves the aforementioned Percentage of alteration to the present . ' stockpile. land form: 70 % Maximum height of cut or fill slqpes: '• 20 ft. , Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? -' X Is the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? -4- ••• Signature STATEMEtT OF NON•GNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL •FECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but yoti .think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: The propo-sed development is in full conformance with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Planned Development Ordinance. The pro-posed residential use is fully compatible with existing and proposed developments in the vicinity of the site.. A biological survey report previously prepared on. this site determined that the loss of the pond aquatic habitat plus scattered individuals of Cal- ifornia adolphia is considered to be an adverse but non-significant effect of the project (see Appendix A). Noise and dust will be generated during the earthwork and construction phases, but this effect will be temporary. Landform impacts will be largely beneficial in that a large, highly visible stockpile of earth will be distributed over the site during grading operations. a COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION..! (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) . Fay 0. Round, Jr. Pay Round and Associates Date Signed February 4, 1,985 . . . . . -5- III. COMMENTS TO QUESTIONS IN SECTION 1 12) Scattered individuals of California adoiphia exist on both sides of the drainage area. This plant species currently carries no federal or state agency status but is designated by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) as rare in California, and common elsewhere (elsewhere normally means Baja California). The :loss of this disjunct population within the project site is considered adverse but not significant (See previously prepared Biological Survey Report contained in Appendix A). 24 and 25) During the construction period, noise and dust will be generated from the use of earthmoving and other equipment. Incidental noise will also occur throughout the building and construction phase, but only during the hours designated by the City. These effects will be temporary, lasting only for the duration of the earthwork and construction phases. 29) A large (roughly 60,000 cy) stockpile of earth was placed on the property during the construction of Alga Road and Melrose Avenue in 1981-83. This earthen mound will be removed and distributed over the site during the earthwork phases of the project. The net effect will be largely beneficial in that the resulting landforrn will conform more closely to the natural topography of the area. The steep hill immediately west of the development area has been excluded from the project. and will remain in its existing state. !1 S BIOLOGICAL -RECONNAISSANCE OF MEADOWS CREST INTRODUCTION A biological survey of a portion of the Meadows Crest project area in La Costa, Carlsbad was made to determine the existing flora, fauna, and habitat types. This report describes the general distribution and component plants of the vegetative associations and discusses wildlife habitat resources and their use. Particular attention during the survey was given to determining the presence or absence of significant biological features on oradjacent to the pro- perty. Significant biological features are herein considered floral or faunal-species of rare and/or endangered status, depleted or declining faunal species, and' species and habitat types of unique or limited distribution. GEOGRAPHICAL LIMITS OF THE STUDY AREA The project area, totaling ±15 acres is situated in the eastern portion of the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego. The future alignment of Melrose Avenue will form the eastern boundary of the property, which lies on the border between Carlsbad and unincorporated San Diego County. The northern property line will be defined by the future extension of Alga Road to intersect with Melrose Avenue. SURVEY ACTIVITIES AND DATES OF FIELDWORK A field survey of the study' area was conducted on 4 June, 1981 by WESTEC biologist Kathleen E. Mooers. Field- work, consisting of onsite review of biological resources, was conducted on foot throughout the entire project area. The survey took place in the morning under clear skies and warm temperatures. Faunal observations were made with the use of 10 x 50 binoculars. Extensive vegetative transect sampling and small mammal trapping were not undertaken for this reconnaissance survey. TA?.JTh T1P ' The project site is currently undeveloped open space which E has been previously used for agricultural or grazing purposes. A southeasterly drainage, which 'courses through. the property, has been dammed to form a catch basin. Property to the north is under development; the 'area to the south is the planned residential development known as Hidden Meadows. Property to the west remains natural and that to the east is occupied by a church and private residences. SOIL TYPES Soil types on the property include ATC (Altamont clay), EXE (Exchequer rocky silt loam), and HrC (Heuheuro loam) LU.S.Dept. Agriculture, 1973). FLORA. Two floral communities are present on the property: Dis- turbed Grassland and Pond -Aquatic (Thorne, 1976). The makeup and onsite distribution of these communities is discussed below. Floral nomenclature throughout the report follows Muñz (1974); common names for, the most part follow Higgins (1949). The disturbed grassland onsite is made up of ruderal, adventitious species such as wild oats '('Avena sp.), foxtail chess "(BromuS 'rubens), rye '(Elymus sp.), 'and goldentop '(Lamar- ckia aurea). A few isolated chaparral species are present, particularly on the steeper western portion of the site. These include sugar bush '('Rh'us ovata), white sage '('S'a'l'via apia'na), laurel sumac '('Rhus 'Iau.r'ina), elderberry "(S'anthuc'us' mexicana), and California adôlphi'a '('Adô'l'p'hia 'c'a'li'f'orn'i'ca). The pond aquatic vegetative community present onsite con- sists of a variety of' aquatic plants such as spike rush (Eleochar'is sp.), cat-tail '(Typha sp..),.bu1rush '('Sc'i'rpus sp.), rush (Juncus sp.), curly dock '(Rumex 'cri'spus), and smartweed (Polygonum sp.). Many weedy, species are also present due to the disturbed 'nature of the 'sorrounding area. Black mustard (Brassi'ca flig'ra) is quite common, as well, as sweet fennel (Fo'eni'cu'l'um vulg'are) and castor bean '(Ri'c'in'us''c'omrnün'is). A total of 37 plant species were recorded during the field survey. Of these, 17 (46 percent) are nonnative, introduced ~J) species. A plant species list is provided as Attachment A. FAUNA - Because of the disturbed character of the site and the lack of cover, wildlife is expected to be limited compared to nearby natural areas. The catch basin onsite, ahabitat,nörmally attractive to wildlife for water, will lose much of its appeal as the adjacent property is developed. An exhaustive species of "expected" fauna was not developed for the site, those species observed or deemed of interest are discussed in the report. Small mammal trapping was not con- ducted. Wildlife observations were made with the aid of 10 x '50 binoculars. Faunal nomenclature within the report follows that of American Ornithologists' Union (AOU, 1957, as revised) for birds, Jones et al. (1975) for mammals, and Stebbins (1966) for reptiles and amphibians. The most noticeable faunal element onsite was the avifauna. Species observed are: western meadowlark (Sturnella neglect,3), common raven (Corvus corax, 1), bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus,2), Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna, 1), brown towhee (Pipilo fuscus, 1), red-winged-blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus, common), and Bewick's wren (Thryomanes bewickii, 1). Two desert cottontails (Sylvilagus audulionii) were the only mammals observed. There were no reptiles or amphibians observed during the survey, though several species are expected to use.the basin onsite. HIGH INTEREST SPECIES/HABITATS Plant and animal species and habitat types are considered of high interest if they are: Rare, endangered, or threatened Of depleted or declining status, limited distribution Endemic or of unique distribution Rare, Endangered, or Threatened No plant or animal species listed or proposed for listing as rare, endangered, or threatened by the U S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, 1980) or the California Department of Fish and ., . Game (CDFG, 1978;.1979) was observed onsite. No species listed by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS, 1980) as rare and endangered or rare but not endangered was observed onsite. One plant species observed onsite is listed by the CNPS (1980) as rare in California but common elsewhere. For plants in this category from the San Diego area, elsewhere usually means Baja California. California adolphia (Adolph'ia californica), a spinescent low scrub, is found as scattered clumps and indi- viduals in the northwestern portion of the drainage onsite. An estimated total of 35 plants occur onsite. This species is rela- tively common in the La Costa area. A number of high interest plant species have been recorded for the general area. These were all considered during the field survey although some are less likely to occur onsite as they are normally found closer to the coast, within a different habitat type than is present', or within a different soil type. High interest plant species which may be expected but were not ob- served are listed in Table 1. A few of the species listed are either annuals or herbaceôus perennials. Of these, Brodiaea filifolia and Acanthomintha ilicifolia are singled out because of their scarcity. Both species prosper in heavy clay soil which is, found in areas of the site. Acanthomintha ilicifolia had been previously reported just east of the eastern terminus of La Costa Avenue. Due to the disturbed nature of the entire site, the prob- ability of finding either of these species was considered low. Depleted, Declining Status,' Limited Distributions A depleted or declining 'faunal species is one that, although still occurring in adequate numbers for survival, has been heavily depleted and continues at a rate which gives cause for concern (Bury, 1971). Such species are declining because of heavy com- mercial exploitation and continuing destruction to their habitats. Two reptile species considered to be declining locally are the coast horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronatüm blainvillei) and the orange-throated whiptail (Cnemidophorus hyperythrus b'eldingi). The San Diego Herpetological Society (1980) considers t h e c o a s t horned lizard to be endangered and the orange-throate d w h i p t a i l to be threatened. Neither of these species was observ e d o n s i t e and neither species is expected, to be found because of t h e l a c k of general habitat requirements for the species. An additional declining reptile species which is expect e d in the general area is the two-striped garter snake (Thai n n o p h i s couchi h'ainmondi). This species is considered threat e n e d b y t h e San Diego Herpetological Society (1980) It is likely to be found along the major drainages in the area such as San M a r c o s Creek, Escondido Creek'and the San Dieguito River; how e v e r , t h e lack of rocks and cover onsite probably prevents th i s s p e c i e s from existing on the property. No bird species which appear on the Audubon Blue List (Arbib, 1979) or on Remsen's Species of Special Conce r n L i s t (Remsen, 1979) were observed onsite. Endemic, Unique Distribution No species endemic to San Diego County were observed o n s i t e . Adolphia calif'ornica is found in the United States only i n S a n Diego County, Although its range extends southward into B a j a California. DISCUSSION AND IMPACT CONSIDERATIONS Preliminary development plans for the site call for t h e c o n - struction of -oondominium units with onsite recreatio n a l f a c i l i t i e s . Most, if not all, of the property will be cleared d u r i n g t h e c o n - struction process. The loss of the onsite population -of Adolphia californica is considered an adverse 'though nonsignifica n t e f f e c t of the project. The onsite-population is generally isolated from any natural open space area and the population is small c o m p a r e d with known populations in the La Costa area in general . T h e current status of the species does not warrant specific ' p r e v e n - tion measures' for, the 'bns'i'te."population.• The loss of the open space grassland and catch'. basin o n s i t e .' . is also considered an adverse effect of project development. Aquatic, riparian, and freshwater marsh h'abi'tats.combined totalled less than two percent of county acreage in 1963 (CDFG, 1965). The catch basin, habitat, attractive to wild- - life for water and forage, is valuable resource which is rare in the dry San Diego region. The disturbed grassland for the most part does not support natural vegetation and undoubtedly supports a limited resident wildlife population i. It is probably used from time to time, however, by raptors for forage from the nearby woodland associated with 'San Marcos Creek to the south. The disturbed nature of the property itself, the construction taking place to the 'north,' and the planned development of the surrounding property to the south and east reduce the impact of project development. • ATTACHMENT A .,f. 'FLORAL SPECIES LIST MEADOWS CREST.. V r La Costa Family. Scientific Name Common Name V Dicotyledoneae Anacardiaceae - Sumac Family Rhus laurina Laurel Sumac Rhüs óvata Sugar Bush Apiaceae (Umbelliferae) - Carrot Family V V vulgare Sweet Fennel Asteraceae (Compositae) - Sunflower Family Ambrosia psilostachya - Western Ragweed var californica V - Gnaphalium beneolens V Everlasting Gnphalium californicu • V V California Everlasting. V Haplopappus squarrosus V Goldenbüsh, Hazardia V V ssp. grindelioides V V •• V Hemizonia fasciculata V V Tarweed V V Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) - Mustard Family • V V V V •V *Brassjca nigra V •, V Black Mustard Lepidium sp. V Peppergrass V *Symbrium alssiumum Tumble Mustard V Caprifoliaceae - Honeysuckle Family V V Sambucu mecaa • •. Elderberry •V V • Convolvulaceae- Morning-Glory Family • - V Calystegia sp. •' • Morning Glory introduced species. V V V . . Euphorbiaceae Spurge Family Eremocarpqs ktigerus Turkey Mullein, Dove Weed Ricinus communis Castor Bean Geraniaceae-Geran!urn Family *Ei.rjdjum sp. Storksbill Lamiaceae(Labiatae) - MintFamily *Mrubjum vulgar e • - Horehound Saiviáarianà • White Sage • Malvaceae - MallowFamily Malacothamnds densiflorus Bush Mallow Oleaceae - Olive Family *Olea europea Olive Piantaginaceae - Plaintain Family - • *pltagrJ sp. • Plaintain Polygonaceae - Buckwheat Family -: *Rum crispus Curly Dock Primulaceae -PrimrcseFamily • *Aflgnfl1s arvensis Pimpernel Rhamnaceae- Buckthorn Family . • *Acjolphja ca1ifonica - California Adoiphia Raceae - RcseFamily • *prunu ilicifolia V Holly-Leaved Chccry Non-native, introduced spe ci es. - -. . . Monocutyiedoneae Cyperaeeae - Sedge Family - *Elchjs sp. - Spike Rush *Scirpus sp. Tule Irid'áceae - Iris Family * Sisyrinchium beUum Blue-Eyed Grass Juncaceae- Rush Family Juncus sp. Rush Poaceae (Graminese)- Grass Family *Avenasp Wild Oats *Bromus moths Soft Chess rubens Foxtail Chess *Djgjt&ia sp. * Crabgrass Elymussp.* : Wild Rye *Lamarckia aurea Goldentop *po1yJgrJn monspeliensis Rabbi tfoot Grass Typhaceae - Cattail Family *Typhasp * Cat-tail sNonnative, introduced species; * _ REFERENCES CITED : American Ornithologists Union, 1957, Checklist of North American birds revised by 33rd supplement in 1976, 93:875-879. Arbib, R. 1977, The Blue List for 1978, Ainerican Birds 31(6):1087-1096. Bury, R. Bruce, 1971, Status report on Californi&s threatened amphibians and reptiles. California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Administrative Report No. 72-2. California Department of Fish and Game, 1965, California fish and wildlife plan. The Resources Agency, Volume 3(c):908. California Department of Fish and Game, 1978, At the crossroads: A report on Cali- fornia's endangered and rare fish and wildlife. The Resources Agency. California Department of Fish and Game, 1979, Endangered and Rare Plants of Califo- rnia. The Resources Agency, October 5. Califonria Native Plant Society, 1980, Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California, Edited by J.P. Smith, Jr., R.J. Cole, J.O Sawyer, Jr. in col- laboration with W.R. Powell. Special Publication No. 1 (2nd Edition). Everett, William T., 1979, Threatened, Declining and Sensitive Bird Species in San Diego County, San Diego Audubon Society, Sketches, June. Higgins, Ethel, 1949, Annotated distributional list of ferns and flowering plants of San Diego, California. San Diego Society of Natural History, Occasional Papers No. 8. Jones, J. Knox', Jr., D.C. Carter and H.H. Genoways, 1975, Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico. Occasional Papers Museum Texas Technical University 28:1-14. Munz, P.A., 1974, A flora of southern California, University of California Press, Berkeley. Remsen, Van, 1977, The species of special concern list: an annotated list of declining or vulnerable birds in California (preliminary), Western' Field Ornithologist, M useum of -Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley. San Diego Herpetological Society,. 1980, Survey and status of endangered and threatened species of reptiles natively occurring in San Diego County, prepared forFish and Wildlife Committee, San Diego Cunty Department of Agriculture. Stebbins, Robert C.,.1966,, A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston . . Thorne, Robert F.,. 1976, The vascular plant communities of California, in June Latting (editor) Symposium proceedings - plant communities of southern California, Cali- fornia Native Plant Society, Special Publication No. 2. - U.S.Department of Agriculture, 1973, Soil Survey - San Diego area, California United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 1980, Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants Review of plant taxa for listing As endangered or threatened species, Federal Register 45(242):82480-82509, Monday, December 15. / 65 Table 1 HIGH INTEREST SPECIES WHICH MAY BE EXPECTED BUT WERE NOT OBSERVED Species Habitat Requirements Status AcanthOmintha ilicifolia Clay soils. CNPS: Rare and Endangered San Diego Thornmint Ambrosia pumila Dry exposed areas, grassland usually CNPS: Rare and Endangered San Diego Ragweed on a floodplain; herbaceous species with a June-September flowering season. Sandy mesas, eroded bluffs. Lowland drainages, north-facing slopes. Coastal mixed chaparral. Heavy clay soils. Moist areas, about seeps. Sandy places and sea bluffs. Heavy soil, open grassy, slopes.: Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. crossifolia Del Mar Manzanita Artemisia palmeri Palmer Sagebrush flaccharis vonessae Encinitas Baccharis Brodiaea filifolia Thread-leaved Brodiaea Brodiaea orcuttii OrcutVs Bródiaea Calandrinia maritima Seaside Calandrinia Calochortus catalinae atalirwr.azipoa Lily None. CNPS: Rare in California, common elsewhere CNPS: Rare and Endangered CNPS: Rare and Endangered CNPS: Rare and Endangered CNPS: Rare in California, common elsewhere. CNPS Rare but not endangered - I ;C-12-. • • • Table 1 (Continued) Species Habitat Requirements Status Ceanothus verrucosus Chaparral; dry hills and mesas. CNPS: Rare in Califonria, Coast White Lilac common elsewhere Chorizantheorcuttiana Sandy places; coastal sage scrub; CDF&G: Endangered Orcutt's Chorizanthe March-April flowering season. CNPS: Rare and Endangered Comarostaphylis diversifolia Summer-Holly Corethrogyne filainifolia ssp.Iinifolia Del Mar Mesa Sand Aster Dichondra occidentalis Western Dichondra Dudleya viscida Sticky Dudleya Iva hayesiana San Diego Marsh- Elder Monardella linoides ssp. viminea Poway Mint Muilla clevelandii San Diego Golden Star Mixed chaparral, generally on north- facing slopes. Coastal bluffs and brushy slopes. In brush or under trees; coastal sage scrub and chaparral; herbaceous species with a March-May flowering season. Steep rocky canyons usually on north- facing slopes. Drainage bottoms. Rocky washes. Dry hillsides and mesas, heavy soils. CNPS: Rare but not endangered CNPS: Rare and Endangered CNPS: Rare in California, common elsewhere CNPS: Rare and Endangered CNPS: Rare in California, common elsewhere CDF&G: Endangered CNPS: Rare and Endangered CNPS: Rare and Endangered Scingindila cinernscens -Mesas and south-facing slopes, open CNPS: Rare in California, Pygmy Spike-Moss - chaparral and coastal sage scrub. common elsewhere . . APPENDIX B Detailed Archaeology Survey (NOTE: This survey was prepared in 1981 on a project known as Hidden Meadows North; the project-area remains- the same, but the name of the. project is now Meadowcrest ) . O . EXISTING CONDITIONS On June 4, 1981, WESTEC Services, Inc. conducted an archaeological survey of the proposed 15-acre Hidden Meadows North. development. The project area was tra- versed on-foot using standard archaeological procedures. Visual inspection of the project site revealed no cultural resources,, either prehis- toric or historic Any cultural debris located within the study area appears to be associated with the abandoned dwelling immediately, south of the project site (circa 1930-1960). A review of previously recorded sites within the study region, as recorded with local archaeological clearing houses at the Museum of Man and San Diego State University, was also negative. . . . . It should be noted that even though visual inspection of .the project site was as thorough as possible; dense grass cover hindered visibility. fl IMPACTS • . . . . Lack of cultural resources within the proposed Hidden Meadows North develop-, ment area precludes possibility of adverse impacts by such a development. MITIGATION. S •. . . ' Because no cultural resources were located within the proposed project area, no archaeological mitigation measures are proposed or required .• . F.WIROMNENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part II (To te Completed By The PLANNING DEPAR'lMENT) CASE NO. DATE:_____________ 1. BACKGROUND I 1 APPLICANT /' e #/9C7/'' 6"0 ypr 4/'C,v 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NiJBER OF APPLICANT:' c/co /6'a' c 77co 3 DATE CHECKLIST SUBMITrED 2/ S II ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (EXPLANATIONS OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE ANSRS ARE TO BE WRITTEN' UNDER Section III - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION) • Yes Maybe No 1. Earth Will the proposal have signi- ficant results' in:- a: Unstable earth conditions or in in changes geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, corn- . paction or bvercovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground : • - surface relief features? -: ' d. The destruction,. covering or - modification of any unique geologic • : • or physical features? Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off . the site" Changes in, deposition or eró- • sion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion' I which may modify the channel, of a river or or the bed of the .stream ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? -I I. •I •' •1 • N)2 S.: Yes Maybe No 2.. Air: Will the proposal have signi- : results in: a. Air emissions or deterioration. of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement,,.•'• mositure or temperature, or any • change in climate, either-locally. ,. or regionally? '• • _____ _____ _____ S. Water Will the proposal have sigi- ficant results in a Changes in currents, or the course or direction P water move- 'merits 'in either. marine or fresh •' • waters? b Changes in absorption rates, - ' drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff' c.' Alterations to the course or flow waters? ' of ,flood Ix th Change in the amount of' sur- . ' ' face water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in' any alteration of surface water. 'quality, including 'but not.. limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ' • ' _____ ',)c ' : f. Alteration of the direction ' ' ' ' or rate of flow of ground waters? ' ' - • ' ' g Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through • '• ' ' - ' ' direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts .or excavations? h. Rduction 'in the amount of ' , " ' • ' 0 • ' water otherwise available for , ' - 0 , public water supplies? - -- 0 , , _____ _____ • _____ -2- .'. . Yes Maybe No 4 Plant Life Will the )r6posa1 have signi- ficant results in change in the diversity of . .. . species, or numbers of any species . of plants (including trees., shrubs, . .. grass, crops, microflora and . . . aquatic plants)?. . . Reduction of the numbers of . . . . - .. .- .. any, unique, rare or endangered . . . species of plants? . . . . I •. Introduction of new species . . of pints into an area, or in a . . . . . barrier to the normal replenish- .. . ' . ment of existing species? Reduction in acreage of any • . .. . . agricultural crop? . . ... •• S 5.. Animal Life-. Will the proposal have signi- ficant results in a. ..Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds,.land animals V . including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, .benthic organisin, insects or microfauna)? •. ____- . V b. Reduction of the numbers of . any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? c Introduction of new species . of animals into -an area, or result V V V in a barrier to the migration or V movement of animals? - d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Noise. Will-the proposalV signi-' V ' ficantly increase existing. noise V levels? ht and Glare Will the pro- .. V posal significantly produce new light or glare? Land Use. Will the proposal have signifiEant results in the alteration V V of the present or planned land use of V an area? '' • . . S -3- • . • . Yes Maybe No .9. Natural Resources. Will the'pro- posal .have significant results in: . . • Increase in the rate of use . . of any natural resources? . Depletion of any nonrenewable . . '. natural resource? . . 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal . involve a sijnificant risk of an . . . . explosion or the release of haz- ardous substances (inluding, but S not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset . conditions? . •. . _____ .. ii. Population.. Will the pr0p0s41 .. . • significantly alter the- location, distribution, density, or growth . . . . . -. rate of the human population of . . an area? •.• .. ..- . .• . .. . •', Housing. Will the proposal signi- ficantly affect existing housing, .. . . or create a demand for additional . housing? . . •. . •• TransportatiOn/Circulation. Will the proposal have significant re- sults - • • .. - . • • a. Generation of additional . . vehicular, movement? . . . . . . .b Effects. on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? Impact upon existing. trans-. portation systems? • • . • . . . . . d. Alterations to present • • patterns of-circulation or move- ..... • ment of people and/or goods? I. • e Alterations to waterborne, . . rail or air traffic? •• . •• _____ X f. 'Increase in traffic hazards . , . •... to motor vehicles, bicyclists or : pedestrians? . • . . _____ _____ -_ -4- S Yes Maybe No 14. Public Services. Will the pro- posal have a significant effect . • upon, or have significant results . in the need for new or altered governmental, services in any of the following areas: . . . . Fire protection? . •• . S _____ _____ _____ Police prOtection? . . ____ -___ •• . c Schools? . Parks or other recreational . . . . facilities? •Mainténance of public facili- . . ••• ties, including roads? '• . . . . _____ Other gbvernmeirtal services?' . . S. 15. Energy." Will the proposal have. . . . significant results in:* -. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? • Demand upon existing sources . . . of energy,, or. require the develop- ment of new sources of energy? •. . . •• . . . •16. Utilities.' Will, the propoai have . . • significant results in the need for • . • • . . • new systems,' or alterations ,to the • . . S • following utilities: S S . S a Power or natural gas? b . Communications systems?. . • • S , . c, Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? ' . ' S • • e Storm hater drainage?. - f. Solid waste and disposal? • • •': • . '' 17 Ihunan .11eaith. Will the proposal ' . . S •. have. sitniTcant results in the . . . . creation of any health hazard or , I S , -• S 'potential health hiznrd: (excluding ' '. S • ' mental health)? Yes Maybe No 18.: Aesthetics. Will the proposal. have - , : significant results in the obstnic- . . . tioii of any scenic vista or view' . open to the public, or will the pro- posal in the creation of an . . • aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . •• . . . _____ . 19. Recreatón. Will, the proposal have -. significint results in the impact upon the qua] ity or quantity of . existing recreational opportunities? 20 Archeological/Historcal Will the • propbsal have significant results . in the alteration of a significant . ' archeological or historical sit,. structure', object or building? • 21.. . , ANALYZE VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO ThE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: • a) PHASED DE'ELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT; b) ALTERNATE SITE DESIGNS; c) ALTERNATE SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT; d) ALTERNATE 0 -. 'USES FOR TI-IE SITE; e) DEVELOPMENT AT SOME FW1JRE TIME RAThER • THkN NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR TI-IF PROPOSED USE; g) NO - PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ' .' . -.6- ' - .•••••• 0 Yes Maybe No 22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE THE POTEN- TIAL 10 DEGRADE THE QUALITY OF THE ENVIRO[ENT, OR CURTAIL THE DIVERSITY IN WE ENVIRONMENT? b) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE THE POTEN- TIAL TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERM, TO THE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG-TERM, ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS? (A SHORT- TERM IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT IS ONE WHICH OCCURS IN A RE- LATIVELY BRIEF, nEFINITrvE. PERIOD OF TIME WHILE LONG-TERM IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL INTO THE FUTURE.) c) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS WI-IICH ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITED, BUT CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE? (A PROJECT MA.Y IMPACT ON TWO OR MORE SEPARATE RESOURCES WHERE THE. IMPACT ON EACH RE- SOURCE IS RELATIVELY SMALL, T BUT WHERE THE EFFECT OF THE TOTAL OF THOSE IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.) d) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON- MENTAL EFFECTS WHICH WILL CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS, - EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY? -Ill.- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUTION rojt 55- 7/si, 4 e' :" 'T''i ,/ /4,7% ,6A •• -. c$It// & , Pf0 )7e( / ' 9ooa 6ic o/14 i /a tpiov rc71h1 • IV DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY 111E PLANNING DEPARTivfiT) On the basis of this initial evaluationi. I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will • be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could havea significant effect on the environment, there will not be• a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A conditional negative declaration will • will be prepared. 0 • 0 a • 0 • - - I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effec on the environment, and an a7VIROM'1ENTAL IMPACT REPORT • is required. - • Date:______________ /) 0•• -• 0 • 0 • • • Signature • • 0 • V MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) -.• -9- •... . .• -77 FEE: $175.00 / RECEIPT NO: ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT'-ASSES SMENT FORM - Part I?€5 (To Be Completed by APPLICANT) CASE NO: DATE: Applicant: U;. /o Address of Applicant: 2521 So. JSTR W A q 5 -rf. 2a. (A cr 3-DO Phone Number: (61j ) i-43-j Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): A Yoa • GENERAL • INFORMATION: • Description of Project: I • Project Location/Address: s/J co . •? LJJUE Assessor Parcel Number: 2 OIL( • Zone of Subject Property: •Rçm' Proposed Use of Site: 7o I ti F-nu. WJ,TS PPcdI01.t5tv S •• List all other applicable applications related to this project: Pi 2. Describe the' activity area, including distiguishing natural and man- made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate.; Pr ou51 r'c& (J r--- SID J ke. I)1t T. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the, design and/or operation of the project. • . . ' If resLdentlal, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents,. and type ofhousehold .size'expected. l4jlpt - If. comrciàl, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. '• • .• . . . AJ(A If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.- If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project tJfct -2- a I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessary.) S YES NO Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? Could the activity affect the functioning of an . established community or neighborhood? . . Could the activity result in the displacement of . community residents? 0 . . . . )( Could the activity increase the number of low and . . modest cost housing units in the city? 6) Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? . ) .7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the . • activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? 8.) Could the activity significantly affect an . historical or archaeological site or. its settings? Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction" or conservation of a . scarce natural. resource? Does the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? S S Could the activity significantly affect.. fish, wildlife or plant life? 0 • • • S 5 12) Are there any rareor endangered.plant species • in the activity area? . . 55• • 5 X _______ Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? .5 0 >< Could the activitychange existing features of anyof the city's beaches? • .5 Couldthe activity result in the erosion or S • S elimination of agricultural 1ands' Could the activity serve to encourage development S of presently,undeveloped areas or. intensify develop- S ment of already developed areas? S • S S S -3- 5 SS YES NO 17)' Will the activity requi'rea variance from 0' , • ' standards (air, water, • noise, etc.)? . ' Will the activity require certification, authoriza- • tion or issuance of a permit by 'any local, state or • federal environmental control agency? Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? 20). Will the.activity' involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? ' Will the activity involve, construction of •'''' facilities in a. flood, plain? Will they activity involve construction of ,facilities in the area of -an active fault? Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25,peräent or greater?.. - Could the' activity result in the generation of significant amounts of n'oise? ' Could. the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? . '26) Will the' activity 'involve the burning' of brush,' trees, or other materials? Could the activity, result in a significant change in the. quality of any 'portion of the 'region's air' or water resou,rces? (Should note surface, ground water', 'off-shore.) Will the project substantially increase fuel, consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? '29) Will there be a, significant change to existing ' • land form? • 0 ' • ' _' Indicate estimated gradingbe done',in -to cubic yards: •. 1(~1 000 ' 0 ; Percentage Ofaltration to the present 0 land form': loo (c). Maximum-height of cut or fill slopes. .: ,, • ' ' • -t- IiY ' F:l L( /7' ,' ' ' . ' • s 6d,d •. 0 ' Will the activiyresu3lt in substantial increases in the useof utilities, sewers, drain's or streets? ' Is the activity carried out as part of. 'a larger • • ' project or series of projects? 0 , ' ' • 0 ' -4- 'H S II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your, reasons below:' ccccJ d urtu4c —ff cç OrLQtc.d1OVs( 1c.J-Q'/ wR . t4. 4D c oS wey Ij I -t .'-- LA 0-1- ---c'- 1L9,6 -t-- c.h-'15 rcJi orU'ce- L'-cl TL,-g, 4ettk)€- Ac1ttt5 f kJC& . 'q) / I p, ' A1&,1 a-i O- OL. 0(J(OLA)(y (i&F-QcIL - 3) -r cGq 15 . tO (9 , ,1 'S IT d ' 4;) 7C) (LV'(5 / C J AA Cr /600 cA;c: ' C,st-- cl III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE 'QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional ,space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) S Signature (Peron Completing Report) 'S S Date Signed ///7/ (2) It, c j 5 ecs( . . -.••: L14i eL&S Sct1-tc c,1[U1'oL.kf ' si t _W C-CL11 -5-. . . . O ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT. FORM - PART II (To Be Completed by the LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE) . . CASE NO. 0 DATE: I. BACKGROUND APPLICANT:• U.S.• . . . . . . ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF.APPLICANT:252/F2. 114- /'ZZ C,et$'5Qo Cf3921A ' '• . (tq) 727 4534 3 DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED II ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers, are to b Written Under: Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) MAYBE ' NO 1. Earth, --Will the proposal have significant results in: : Unstable' earth conditiorisor in, changes in geologic substructures? Disruptions, displacements, corn- paction or'overcovering of the soil? c., 'Change in topography or ground surface relief features? - d. The destruction, covering or' modification of 'any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water- erosion of soils, either on or off the site? ' -• f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes 'in- siltation, deposition or.erosion which may modify the channel or a - river 0r stream or the bed of the, ocean. or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO 2. Air - Will the proposal have significant results in: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable - I odors? 0 C. Alteration of air movement, -. moisture or temperature, or any • change in climate, either locally S or regionally? 3. Water -: Will the proposal have significant results in: . a. Changes in currents, or the course. - or direction of water movements, . in either marine or fresh waters? • • • • b. Changes in absorption rates,. 0 0; drainage patterns, or the rate and • 0 amount of surface water runoff - c. Alterations to the course or. flow of flood waters? •. • 0 d.• Change inthé anount.of surface water in any'water body? ______ • A • e,. Discharge into surface waters, . •• 0 0• or in any alteration of surface • 00 water quality, including but not. limited, to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? - - 0 .f. Alteration of the direction or • • rate of flow of ground-waters?- g. Change in the quantity of ground 0• '- .5 waters, either through direct •. 0 additions,or withdrawals, or through 0 0 interception of an aquifer by cuts 0 • • or excavations? 0 • . ___ ____ h. 0 • ,0 Reduction in the amount of water • , . otherwise available for public 0 0 water supplies? . 0 • • 0 • 0 . -2- H. .. 4 YES MAYBE 4. Plant Life Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the diversity.of species, or numbers of any species of plants . (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? a. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural, crop? 5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animáls.including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,' . - . insects or microfauña)? b. Reduction of the numbers-of-any unique, ;• rare or endangered species of animals? Introduction of new species of animals into an area,, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? • ______ _____ 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly " increase existing.noise levels? 7. • Light and Glare - Will the 'proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? 8. • Land Use - Will the proposal have ' significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an • • . • • area? ': • • . - _______ _____ -3-' :>ç 'x. 11 YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources. - Will the proposal . . have significant results in:. Increase in the rate of use of any . natural resources? Depletion of any nonrenewable . ••. natural resource? . . . . . 10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous . ... . . . . substances (including, but not limited. . . . . to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? • . . .11.. Population - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- . tion, density, or growth rate of the • human population of an area? 12. Housing - Will the proposalsignif- • • icantly affect-existing housing, or • •• . • create a demand-for-additional housing? • 13.. Transportation/Circulation -,Will the . S • proposal have significant results in S S • Generationof additional vehicular .,- movement? S S • Effects on 'existing parking, facilit- ies, or demand for new parking? S • S C. Impact upon existing transporation - S S • systems? S S S • S S _______ d. Alterations to present patterns of . • circulation or. movement of people • • • • : • S • • and/or goods?- e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or • • S 5 .5 S • air traffic? . ,S • • •. 5 - S 5 5 5 5 5 f. Increase in traffic hazards to • • S motor vehicles, bicyclists or • 5 S pedestrians? S S S • 5 S • • ______ S • • 5 5 4 . . .. .V, ,.V YES: MAYBE NO 14. Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or ' altered governmental services in any of the followi-ng areas: Fire protection? 'Police. protection? Schools? Parks or'other recreational V facilities? V e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Energy - Will the proposal have signif- icant results in: V a. Use of substantial amount's of fuel -. or energy?. 'b. Demand upon existing sources of V energy, or require •the development ' '• V ', - of new sources of 'energy?' 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new V systems, or alterations to the following ' utilities: Power or natural gas? V ' Comthunications systems? Water?' V d'. Sewer or septic tanks? V Storm water drainage? V '• V ' ' _____ ______ , Solid waste and disposal? V V V V V 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have V significant results' in the creation of any 'health hazard or potential health V hazard '(excluding mental health)? V V V V -5- V V ' ES MAYBE • NO 18. Aesthetics-will the. proposal have significantresultsin the obstruction . of any scenic, vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in . creation of an- aesthetically offensive public view?, . • . _____ ______ • 19. Recreation - Will the proposal have • . significant results in the impact upon • . • the quality or quantity of existing - • ' recreational opportunities? • . ("i Archeological/Historical - Will the : proposal have significant results in . the alteration of a significant • . . : archeological or historical site, ,' • y- . • structure, object or building? .(\ Analyze viable alternatives to the 'proposed project such as: • a) Phased development of the project,. b) alternate site designs, • '. C) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, ' e) development at some future time.rather than now, f) alternate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative., • • • , -6- S 22. Mandatory Findings of Significance a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the ' environment, or curtail the diversity. in the environment? •' b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one' which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure -well into the 'future.) C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively' considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is signi'ficant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse'effects on'human beings,. either directly; or, indirectly?, III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION q—&S-&,-WA5 oLI'iINAty V014 D51cL - 1' 000 cu t 3/c y.4IZOJ of ,g - ' oi Ocioe' ' /c, q85 7%' PC4J,H-d(7 0/1 1a/t , V/51i KY 10 76 O(Q,,i4L-1G1. 174/s €LWS/CA/ 'EQQ,/'9 Af'/ ///Oot CU6 /C 4ip o 3 Q/'j 0'- Moo • t.) A4 0 ICAf /it) L4, IOVeQ 17/L) 4X 1'40eq, fZi -o-i :'L)IIz60 ', :Oic6 Iwo rn- ZL) -t XA (LL' i4df c iA)/ P ,4cmi/IO) .4 ive ' • , -7- Iv. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed-by the Land Use Planning Office) On the basis of this initial evaluation: __I find the proposedproject COULD NOT have a significant effect on \the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could' have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect, in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. - S I find the proposed project MAY have asig'nificant effect on the environment,-and an;ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. S Date ( / V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)' -. ;