The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPE 2.86.02; LA COSTA VALE UNIT NO. 3; Engineering ApplicationPal Building Permit Plan Check No. g' Application for Grading Permit CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm Avenue 438.5541 PE NO. 2.8G°2 tc Validation by Finance Department IOT'78 41,TT7aG 2T5 ta 0O TI FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN Site Address 3352. Ve.ncao s-b Legal Description Map No. LOT 457 Subdivision Name ',&,4iT ,4p.. Owner Phone 4 ,__ - Owner's Address 33S1 \Iv1c4o '. Cts&( Plans by Civil Engineer R.C.E. RA-LP M. VIt4E Address Phone 47, w vsisr 126 Soil Engineer R.C.E. Phone RPLPI-I -M 727-11e Grading Cdntractor . Phone - - Address El CM o R&t1 Party responsible for overall supervision Proposed use of grade site d31LE 4=AMiuy r2es%b&jxz of cubic yards Cut Fill Import Waste 34oô34op Proposed Schedule of Start Finish Operations (dates) Lpr.f APR iI_- I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to this application. Signature of PermitteC" 4 1j)_s Owner or authorized agent ( Date //,z , Aga ElALogNo. ,OE S-P. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - By Grading permit fee $ -/J Plan check fee sa 0,41,0 Permi(ioed.. by Date Perm ixpiration Surety Company 0 1 9•, 575• Bond No. _4-4' -,JT JSM 6jgn, .57 Surety Address Date Filed Rec'd by Cash deposit Rec'd by Date filed $ £/ 7 5 The following documents are required and shall become a part of the grading permit when they are approved. Grading plans Specifications ' Soil report Geologic Report Drainage structures ______ Other Compaction report SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE A PART OF THIS PERMIT 1. Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday. - 1 2. Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation control. All slopes shall be planted per City Code. All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum density unless noted otherwise. Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: U REGULAR GRADING . City inspector will make inspections listed below. CONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall observe work, coordinate tests, make reports. INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE Initial - site prep. Rough - prior to drains Final - slopes planted 919-17 5 01 Compaction reports rec'd. Private engr. cert. rec'd. pies: White-Office; Green-Building; Yellow-Inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod-Finance THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED ISA PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD 0/ FEE: $175.00 RECEIPT NO: ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To Be Completed by APPLICANT) CASE NO:. -2- DATE: Applicant: tD%y\S 1fl*(iS . I Address of Applicant: 33St 'Je a.cLcs &i. VS Phone Number: (ot' Name, address and.phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant) flAMS 6-714240 GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: Project Location/Address. "Jj\c4o ck. Lth •4S? L ..OS4G \Jt *6. 3 Assessor Parcel Number: .- - Zone of Subject Property: Proposed Use of S it e c. vJtI, d List all other applicable applications related to this project:. S. ..2. ..Describe the activity area, 'including distiguishing natural and man- made characteristics;' also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. .' S 3. Describe energy conservation measUres incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. 4.. If residential, include the number of units, schedule ofunit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household -size expected. 5. If comercial, indicatethe type, whether neighborhood,- city or regionally oriented, square footage of, 'sales area, and loading facilities. S •' S ' S - 6.1 If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. S S 7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading-facilities, and community benefits to be 'derived from the project. S S S S •, S - -: S S -2- w V. . .• I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessary.) . . . YES NO Could the land uses project significantly change present in the vicinity of the activity? Could the activity affect'the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? Could the activity increase the number of low and . modest cost housing units in the city? Could the activity decrease the number of low and . modest cost housing units in thecity? Are any of the. naturalorman-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? . Could the activity significantly affect. an historical or archaeological site or its settings? Could the activity significantly affect the . . potential use, extraction, or conservation of a . Does the activity signifiàantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? Could the activity changeexisting features of any of the city's beaches? Could the activity result in the erosion or . . elimination of agricultural lands? . . . 16)' Could the activity, serve to -encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment'of already developed areas? . . -3- scarce natural resource? • .. S YES NO 1.7) Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water,, noise, etc.)? . Will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? Will the activity involve the application, use,or disposal'of potentially hazardous.materials? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in flood a plain? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? S Could the activity result in the generation of . ,1 significant amounts of noise? 25) Could.the activity result in the generation of ' significant-amounts-of dust? 26) Will the activity involve the burning of biush, .. . trees, or other materials? . . . 27) Could the, activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the.region's air or' water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) . S S• 28) Will the projectsubstantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Will there be a significant change to existing. land form? 'Indicate estimated grading to be done in 'cubic yards: 34ca • ' ' ' Percentage of alteration to the present land form: Maximum height of cut or fill slopes: S 30) ' Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? ' 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? -4- .. ,.. Gt) II.. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think, the activity will have no. significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) Signature Report) Date Signed t4 4 • . ) ENVIRONMENTALIMPACT. 'ASSESSMENT __FORM - Part II (To Be Completed By The: PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NOE2_c3(,O2 DATE:, I. BACKGROUND ' 0 1. APPLICANT: is 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 331_V @t 3V)L 3 DATE CHECKLIST SUBMITTED- 1/ 14 k II. ':ENVIRONMENTAL _IMPACTS . (EXPLANATIONS OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE ANSWERS ARE TO BE WRITTEN .UNDER • Section III - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION) 0 0 Yes ''Maybe 'No 1. 'Earth Will the proposal have signi- •ficant results in: , • 'a. UnStable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? 0 ' ' ' b. Disruptions, displacements, corn-' ' 0 , paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground ' ' surface, relief features? d.. The destruction,covering or modification of'any'unique geologic or physical features? ' ,' 0 ' ''' ' ''' H'' O ' e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of'soils, either on or off ' the site? 0 - ' '0 0' 'eo f., Changes in deposition or ero-' sion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion ' •' ' which may modify the channel of a' , river or stream or the-bed of the •: , ' •• ocean 'orany bay, inlet or lake? • .'. ' ' 0 • ' ND2 S / 0 Yes Maybe No 2., Air: Will the proposal have signi- , ??u1ts in: '. a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? '• ____ •'• b. Thecreation-of objectionable ' 7< odors? c. Alteration of air movement, • •, mositure or temperature, or any . . change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water: Will the proposal have ,sii- ficant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the' course or direction of water move- ments, in either marine or fresh waters? , b. Changes 'in absorption rates, . drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? . ' ; Alterations to the course or, flow 'of flood, waters? d.. Change in the amount of sur- face' water in any water body? , ' e. Discharge into surface waters,' or in any alteration of surface' ' water' quality, including but not • ' limited to temperature, dissolved ,: • ' - 'oxygen or turbidity? ' ' • _____ ' ' ' ' ' f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? • g. Change in the quantity of'' ' ground waters, either through , 0 • ' direct additions or withdrawals, ' • ' ' 0 or through interception of an ' • • ' • ' aquifer by cuts or excavations? ' 0 '"' ' '• h. Reduction -In the amount of • • ,0 water otherwise available for '• ' ' 0 0 public water supplies? /7 / Yes ' Maybe No 4.. Plant Life. Will the proposaihave signi- ficant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, inicroflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any uni4ue, rare or endangered species of,plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5,. ''Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi'- ficarit results in: a, Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds., land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthit organisms, insects or, inicrofauna)? ' b. Reduction of the numbers -of- any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ' Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? Deterioration' to existing fish or wildlife habitat? • Noise, Will the proposal signi- ficantly increase existing noise ieveis , • • : _____ ''Light'ad Glare. Will the pro- posal significantly produce new light or glare? ' Land Use. Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned. land use Of an area? • ' . ' -3- Yes Maybe • • - 9. Natural Resources. Will the pro-' posal have significant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use 01 any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of haz- ardous substances (including, but Pot limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation). in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Population. Will the proposal significantly alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Housing.. Will the proposal signi- ficantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? TranspOrtatIOn/Circulation. Will the proposal have significant re- suits in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b Effects onexistingparking facilities, or. demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing trans- portatiofl systems? d Alterations to present patterns of circulation or ove- ment of people and/or goods? e Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? L Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?' Yes". . Maybe No 14. Public Services. Will the pro- po.sal have a significant effect upon, or have significant results in the need fornewor altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools?. Parks or other recreational, facilities? Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will the proposal have significant results in: Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Demand upon existing sources.. of energy or require the develop- ment of new sources of energ'? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal have significant results in the need: for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b., Communications systems? 'Water? Sewer or septic tanks? e.• Storm water drainage? • f. Solid waste and disposal?. 17 Hthiañ Health.. Will the proposal have signigi.cant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)7 _s_ Yes 18. Aesthetics.. Will theproposal have significant results in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open S to public view? Recreation. Will the proposal have fi.ant 'results in the impact - - upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, . . structure, object or building? _____ • _____ _____ ANALYZE VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) PHASED DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT; b) ALTERNATE. SITE DESIGNS;. c) ALTERNATE SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT; d) ALTERNATE USES FOR THE SITE; e) DEVELOPMENT AT SOME FUTURE TIME RATHER THAN NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR THE PROPOSED USE; g) NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE. • • a) pi b)1Esa (M jqcek( C) v\edeo± ctQd3 O) cavkca 'sI\€ titch i1*€crà\Jes ) co .•. • + VI\Q c3 b\a b* \Jiab(E f. •' fl Yes Maybe No 22. MANDATORY:FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. • a) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE THE POTEN- TIAL TO DEGRADE THE QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, OR CURTAIL THE DIVERSITY IN THE ENVIRONMENT? . DOES THE PROJECT HAVE THE POTEN- • TIAL TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERM, TO • THE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG TERM : 0 ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS? (A 0SHORT TERM. IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT • IS. ONE WHICH OCCURS IN A BE-. 'LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE . I PERIOD OF TIME WHILE LONG-TERM IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL INTO • THE . FUTURE.) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS . WHICH ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITED, • BUT CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE?. (A PROJECT MAY IMPACT ON TWO , . .. OR MORE SEPARATE RESOURCES . :. WHERE THE IMPACT ON EACH BE- ••. . S SOURCE IS RELATIVELY SMALL) . . . . BUT WHERE THE EFFECT OF THE . . TOTAL OF THOSE IMPACTS ON THE . . 0 • ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.) . . .. d) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON- MENTAL EFFECTS WHICH WILL . . • CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE . • EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS, EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY? III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUTION . . yards 01 0 ck/ 3 . I . IV 'DETERMINATION. (TO BE COMPLETED .BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT). On the basis of this initial evaluation I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a, Significant 'Neffect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will beprepared. - I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effectôn the. environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A conditional negative deçlarátion will will be prepared I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required • 41/ __ ignatre V. MITIGATINCMEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) • • •: 1200 ELM AVENUE TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5541 Office of the City Engineer - Citp at CarLbab TO: BUILDING DEPARTMENT FROM: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL FOR PROJECT NO. (Tract or P.E. #) /,q sr4 1tC Imr 3 (Tract Name) J)Ew,vis /9715 3351 S7 ()I/ZL&4P (4 ?ZOOa (Developer's Name &Address) 0y41) We have inspected the grading for lots or phase /-QJ6C.7 of the above mentioned project. In addition, we have received rowih grading certification from iiV i1'E,i4 - , the Soils Engineer, dated 6,13/8(' , and from 19t/ the Supervising Grading Engineer, dated 613 and are satis- fied that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with City standards. Based on these certifications and our observation, we take no exception to the issuance of a building permit for lots 47 or phase of project LA (-b sm I,4I.E iJyir 3 - from a grading standpoint. This release, however, is not intended to certify the project from other engineering concerns including site development, water or sewer availability-,..or final grading. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, we need to be advised so that we can verify that final arading and landscaping has been complet- ed in accordance with the approved plans for the project. APPROVED: • • 7 Pect Grading Ins ctor h Quality Control cc: Developer