HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.86.09; LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT 4; Engineering ApplicationO . . FEE: $175.00
RECEIPT NO: %573S7
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I
(To. Be Completed by APPLICANT) . .
CASE NO: PJc2/pO9
DATE: 1-2.0-86
Applicant: . Jerry Hacker ö/o Carlsbad Security. Tnr
Address of Applicant: 6992 El Camino Real #104
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone Number: (619 )438-1499
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than
Applicant): Brian Smith Engineers., 'Inc. . 4619) 729-8981 - Tr'rgn Wrf1Ud
GENERAL INFORMATION: .
Description of Project: grading for a. single family lot
Project Location/Address: 2710 Arónauta Street, Carlsbad, CA (La Costa)
Assessor Parcel Number:
Zone of' Subject Property:
215 - 400 _15
Residential
Proposed Use of Site: grading for a single family residence
- List all other applicable applications related to this project:
'Obtaining grading permit from the rity of Ca1ba
Environmental Impact Assessments for grading permits must be accompanied
with a grading plan and grading profile. . '.
(D
'2.' Describe the activity area,'including distiguishing natural and man-
made characteristics; also provide, precise slope analysis 'when
appropriate.
No distinguished natural and manmade characteristics
Established residential area -see grading plan
Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design,'
and/or operation of the project.
'
N/A - grading permit only
If residential, include the number of units, schedule of 'unit sizes,
range of sale prices or rents, and type of household, size expected.
single family residentia1 - 3,000 sq. ft. Price unknown.' •'
4 bedrooms
If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or
' regionally' oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities.
, N/A-
.6. If industrial, indicate type, 'estimated employment per. shift, and' '
loading facilities. " •
N/A • ' ' -
• ''
7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per
' shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits
to be derived from the project.
N/A
-2-.
•
'
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate'
space. (DisctlSS all items'cheçked "yes". Attach additional. sheets as
necessary.)
1) Could.'the project significantly 'change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activity?
2) Could the activity affect the use of 'a recreational
area, or area of important aesthetic value?
3) Could the activity 'affect the functioning of an
'established community or neighborhood?
Could the activity result in the displacement of
community, residents? '
x
Could the activity increase the number of low and '
modeSt cost housing units in the city? ' X
Could the activity decrease the number of: low and ,
modest cost housing units in the city?
Are any of the natural or man-made features in the
activity area unique, that is, not found in other
parts of the county, state or nation?
Could the activity. significantly affect an
historical or archaeological site or its settings?
Could the activity significantly, affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource? '
Does the a'ctivity'significantly affect, the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
'Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life?
Are there any rare or endangered plant species
In the activity .area?
Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands?
Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches?
Could the activity -result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands?
Could the activity serve to encourage development
of presently 'undeveloped areas or intensify develop-
ment of already developed areas? x
4)
'5)
-3-
. . 7
X
x
X
X
x
X
2-3)
24)
S
YES NO
Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water,
noise, etc.)?
Will the activity' require certification, authoriza-
tion-or issuance of a permit by any local, state or
federal environmental control agency?
Will the activity require issuance of a variance
or conditional use permit by the City?
Will the activity involve the application, use, or
disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain?
Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault?
Will the activity, involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of noise?
Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of dust?
'Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees,' or other materials?
X
X
27) Could the activity result in a significant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's air
or water resources? (Should note surface, ground
water, off-shore.) '
X
28) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)?
X
29) Will there be a significant change 'to existing
.
land form?
Indicate estimated grading to be done in
cubic yards: 6,800 (import)
Percentige of alteration to the present
land form:. 50%
'Maximum height of cut or fill slopes:
22 feet
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities,, sewers, drains or streets? . X
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger
project or series of projects? .
.
x
-4- 11
Signature
Date Signed
STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section
I but You think the activity will have no significant environmental
effects, indicate your reasons below:
In grading the lot we are creating two flat areas with.slope
between them for a split level house with a rear 2:1 slope to
daylight. . *
By following the City Standard for grading and slope planting
this should have no significant environmental effect.
COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach
additional sheets as needed.)
W__
S...
;..
O S :..
ENVIRONMENTAL .IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(To Be Completed by the LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE)
CASE NO...PL
- S DATE: / ø/
1. BACKGROUND 0
1. APPLICANT: J1)/ ckf?r do Ckbèr SOLK'+
2.' ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: (Car
.. 7-OC
3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED:______________________________________
II. 'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to b Written Under
Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth - Will the proposal have
5 5 significant results in:. S
a. Unstable earth-conditions or in : 0
Changes in geologic substructures?
b.. Disruptions, displacements, corn- 0 • S
paction or overcovering of the soil?
• c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or • - • 0
modification of anyunique geologic 0
or physical features? 0 •
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils,either on or off
the site?.
•
• •
0 •
0 • S
; f. Changes in deposition -or erosion •
0
of beach sands, or changes in .
.5 • siltatiOn, deposition or erosión -• 0 • • •
which may modify the channel or a •
river or stream or the bed of the.
5 •• • S • ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 55
YES MAYBE NO
2. Air - Will the proposal have
iijnificant results in:
a. • Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? • : ______ _____ ______
•b. The creation of objectionable
•
odors?
- C. - Alteration air movement,; of
moisture or temperature, or any
- change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
3. Water --Will the proposal have •
significant results in: • • -
a. Changes in currents, or the course • • -
or direction of.water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters?
______ _____ •______
b. Changes in -absorption rates, •
drainage patterns, or the rate and • • - amount •of surface water runoff?
•
c. Alterations to the course or flow ••
- - of flood waters?> -
d. Change in the amount of surface -
water in any water body? • '-•
e. Discharge into surface waters, ••
or in any alteration of surface -
water quality, including but not
limited to, temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
•
• _____ ______
f. Alteration of the direction or • •
rate of-flow of ground waters?
______ •
-
g. Change in the quantity of ground - •
-
waters, either-through direct - - -
• additions or-withdrawals, or through --
•
•
- interception of an aquifer by cuts • • • or excavations?
•
- - • • • ••
h., Reduction in the amount of water : • -• -
otherwise available, for public •
1
• • -.
' water supplies? •
• • • - ______ _____ ______•
-2- • •• •
. . YES MAYBE NO
4. Plant Life -.Will the proposal have
• significant results in:
Change in the diversity of species,
• or numbers of any species of plants
(including, trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
• unique, rare or endangered species -
of plants?
C. Introduction of new species of plants
into an area, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
d.
•
Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
(
'5.: Animal Life - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Changes in the' diversity of species, 0
• or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish and shellfish, benthicorganisms,
insects 'Dr microfauna)? • •
Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
• - rare or: endangered species of animals?
C. Introduction of new species of animals •
0
into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of
Animals?
0 -.
0 •
d. Deterioration to ex-isting fish or , S
wildlife habitat? ••
_____ ______
6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly • -
increase existing noise levels?
• )c
7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig- • • •
• nificantly produce new light or glare?-
.8. Land Use - Will the proposal have •
significant results in the alteration of • 0
the present or planned land use of an •
• area? '•
0
• •
0 _______ I.
-3-
YES MAYBE NO
9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal
have significant results in: S
Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources?
Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset Does the proposal
• involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the release of haz.ardous .. substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident
- or upset conditions?•'
11. Population - Will the proposal signif-
icantly alter the location, distribu-
• tion, density, or growth rate of the
human population of an area?
12. Housing - Will the proposal signif- • • S
• icantly affect existing housing, or • S
• create a demand for additional housing? • • S •)&
13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the • • .
- . proposal have significant results in: S
Generation of additional vehicular S S
movement?. S
Effects on existing parking facilit- -
ies, or demand for new parking? • 0
C. Impact upon existing transporation
systems? S S
S
d. Alterations to present-patterns of
5 S circulation or movement of people • •• S -
• and/Or goods? S • S • • S
•
e.,.-Alterations to waterborne, rail or • .
air traffic? . . •______ 0
S f• Increase in traffic hazards to • • • S . • motor vehicles, bicyclists or.. 0 0 • • S 0 pedestrians?
S 0 • -4- S
YES MAYBE NO
14. public Services -: will the proposal have .
a. significant effect upon, or have signif-
icant results in the need for new or -
'altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
Fire protection? .
.
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks or other recreational . .
facilities?
Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
Other governmental services?
.
15. Energy -. Will the proposal have signif-. .
icant results in: . . .
Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
Demand upon existing sources of S
energ'y,or require the development
-
of new sources of energy?'
.
. I"-
16.. Utilities - Will the proposal have .
significant- results in the need for new -. • .
• - systems,. or alterations to the following S
utilities: . • . S • -
a. Power or natural gas?
-
:
- S. - b. Communications systems?. ,
Water?
Sewer or septic tanks? .
-
. . .
Storm water drainage?
f Solid waste and-disposal?
17. Human -Health - Will-theproposal have S
significant results in. the creation of . S ' •
any health hazard or potential health . .-
hazard: (excluding mental health)? . .
•
S
.
.
.
- -5- -
YES MAYBE NO
18. AeVsthetics Will the proposal have . V significant results in-the obstruction ; • V of -any' scenic vista or view open to the • V V public, or will the proposal result in
V creation of an aesthetically offensive
public view?. V • V
19. Recreation - Will the proposal have V V significant results in the impact upon V the quality or quantity of existing
V
V
recreationalopportunities?
V V 20. Archeological/Historical - Will the V V
V proposal have significant results in V .
•
. . .
the alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site,
V structure, object or building? V
V V
V
21. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as: •
a ) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs,. V
C) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site,
V
. e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alternate
V V sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative..'
V . V
a) rñ5
7) Bco ca. yarcs 41L A CA
1 1
rov ir - iaki
V
•
V:V .
\\
V
.22.
ai1 C
owe1 IO 3 +h G'i) iJi
-6-
S
YES MAYBE NO
22. :Mandatory Findings of SignificancVe
a. Does, the project have the potential V
V
to degrade the qualityVof the .. V
V environment, or curtail the diversity V V in the environment? V V
V V
b. Does the project have theV potential
V V to achieve short-term, to the Vdis-
V advantage of long-term, environmental V V V V
V V goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a V •
V V
V
V relatively 'brief, definitive period of V
V
V V
V V V time while Long-term impacts will V V
V V V V V endure well into the future.) • V
V
_____ ______V
c. Does the project have impacts which V VV V
V
V
V
V
V are -individually limited, but V V
V
V V
V
V cumulatively considerable? (A V
V
V
V
V
V
V project may impact on two or more V V
V V V V separate resources where the impact V V V V
V V • V V V
V V on each resource iSV relativelyV smalVi,
V V V V • but where the effect of theVt,otal of V those impacts on the environment is V V
V V
V
V
V
significant.,)
V d. Does the project have environmental V V V V V V V V V
effects which will cause 'substantial V V
V
V V V
V adverse effects on human beings, V V
V V V
V
V
V V V V either directly or indirectly?'.
VIII DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
10
hoi T Gth c,$ic yaccs
I 4o i's 2
IV DETERMINATION (To Be Completed by the Land Use Planning Office)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:. . .
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a. significant •
effect on the environment, there will not be.
,
significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project.. A Conditional Negative
• : Declaration will be proposed. •. • • • ••
I find the. proposed 'project MAY have a significant effect on. the .,environment, arid an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. • •.
Date Signature
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
• •.•• • •. • • • '. • • ••• • •
• • -9--. • • • •
-10-