Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.86.41; SEAVIEW WAY; Engineering ApplicationApplication for Grading Permit RE NO. / CITY OF CARLSBAD DW. Na. 27'-7 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm Avenue . e5 •11 Validation by Finance Department Building Permit Plan Check No. FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN Site Address Surety Company Bond Legal Description. • Surety Address ____________________ Subdivision /Date J-Rec'd by Owner Phone g , Cash deposit Rec'd by Date filed . . $ Owner's Address ? ''?4 c/62E2 4 ,6c- The following documenare required and shalY'becoi'e a part the grading permit when they are approved. V' Grading plans I Specifications Soil reort Geologic Report V' Drainage structures . _____ Other Plans y Civil Engineer p V Compaction report. RC.E. Rho /f/. ;7%1:4 'f Phone SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE APART OF THIS PERMIT Address Authorized hours of operation: _____________________________ 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday. r Party Isponsi erall supevn Haul routes are to be aproved by City Engineer. Proposed use of grade site '<ë/ Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation Number of cubic yards control. Cut Fill Import Waste . All slopes shall be planted per City Code. //7 /94 /2o 7 Proposed Schedule of Start Finish !-lL 4.0 , 717 ,L All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum density unless noted otherwise. Operations (dates) I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with all City ordinances and State-laws regulating excavating and adding, Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: and the provisions and conditions of ny permit uedpuantto D REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections this application. sted below. CONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall - observe work, coordinate tests, make reports. 17 INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE Owner or authorized agent ENV IRONMENTAL.CLEARANCE - Date ________________________ Initial - site prep. Rough . prior to drains E I A Log No. 2r'------' Final . slopes planted By Grading permit fee $ . Plan check fee $ £ Compaction reports recd. • .. Permit Issued Private engr. cert. rec'd. by • Date . Copies: White-Office; Green-Building; Permit Expiration Date Yellow-Inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod-Finance THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED I TH1IS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD . EN GINEERING w pQc FEE: $175.00 - RECEIPT NO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM ---Part I (To Be Completed by APPLICANT) CASE NO 1E 2 DATE Applicant AZ4-6'L- Address of Applicant: Phone Number ó/e) Name, address and phone number fperson to be contacted (if other ,than Applicant) ec GENERAL INFORMATION '' "- -'- Description of Project - 15; Project Location/Address. 65/ Assessor Parcel Number Zone of Subject Property __Azefs _____________________________________ Proposed Use of Site List all other applicable applications related to this project Z_V/~ •.• $ • $ I $$ $ $ I 4 .• $ $ • S . Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man- made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. - Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project /46e 4.. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household si-ze expected. :3- If commercial, 'indicat4 the.type, whether neighborhood, city or .. regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. /&//,4 If industrial', indicate type, estimated employment per shift,and loading facilities. / /V/ If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project IV114 -2- : . 0 I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS ..: Answer.the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space.. (Discuss all items checked "yes".. Attach additional sheets as. necessary.) . 0 . . .. . . . . . YES . NO 1). Could, the project significantly change present ,. . • land uses in the vicinity of the activity?. Could the activity affect the use of a recreational. area, or area of important aesthetic value? . . Could the activity affect the functioning of an '. . established community or neighborhood?. Could the activity result in the displacement of . 0 community residents?' '5) Could the activity increase the number of low, and ' modest. cost housing units in the city? 6) Co,uld.the activity decrease the number of low and . -. modest cost housing units in the city? .7) . Areany'of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? . 8) Could the activity.significantly affect an . historical or . archaeological site or its settings? 9). Could the activity'significantly affect the . potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Does the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of.a •' . scarce natural resource? 0 Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? 12).. 'Are there any. rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? . Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? , Could the activity change existing features of . 0 any of, the 'city's beaches? .15). Could the. activity result in the erosion or elimination of agricultural lands? 16) , Could the'activity serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ' 0 merit of already developed areas? '• . ' 0 . 0 . . YES NO 17) Will theactivity require a variance from 0 established environmental standards (air, water, . . . - noise, etc.)? Will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? . . Will the activity require issuance of a variance S or conditional use.permit by the City? Will the activity involve the application, use, or - - disposal of potentially hazardous materials? Will the activity involve construction of. S S facilities in a. flood plain? 2.2) Wilithe activity involve construction of facilities in the aréaof an active fault? . 23): Will the activity involve constructi6n 'of . . .5 facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? 24.) Could the activity result in the generation of S significant amounts of noise? Could-the activity result in the generation of S significant amounts of dust? •.. S ________ -- S Will the activity involve the burning of brush, - ... trees, or other materials?.., Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground S S water, off-shore.) S • S ________ _______ Will the project substantially increase 5 fuel S S S consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? Will there be significant change to existing - .• - S • - • - S • 5 land form?. - S - • S __ 0 (a) Indióate estimate4gradi'ng to -be done in. ••0 S S • cubic yards: Percentage of alteration to .thepresent, . 0 5 land form: 2c 7L S • S S Maximum height of cut or fill slopes: 301 Will the, activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets' 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a1arger S - • project or series of projects?- S -4- .VVV VV VVVT Yes Maybe. No V V 2 Air Will the proposal have signi- 'V results in V . V a Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? . b. The creation of objectionable V odors? c Alteration of air movement, V V V mositure or temperature, or any V V • V V V change in climate, either locally V V V V V V V V V or regionally? 3. Water: . Will the proposal have sigi- . ficant results in: V V ' V V• V V V V a. Changes in currents, or the V V course or direction of water move- V V V V V ments,. in either marine or fresh V V V V V V V waters?V V : . V V V •V V VçV . V V V V Vb. Changes in absorption rates, V V V V : drainage patterns, or the rate and V • V V VV •. amount of surface water runoff? •' V V V V _____V V V .V V V •. V V c. Alterations to the course or, V•• : . V VV V V V flow of flood waters? . .' d. Change in. the V amount Of sut V V V• V V • V . face water in any water body? V V V : V •. . V ' V .e. Discharge into surface waters, or jflV any alteration. of surface V V V V . water quality, including but not V V V V V .. limited to temperature; dissolved • V •• • • V V V V •. oxygen or turbidity? •V . V • _____V V ,V V v" V V V V . V f• Altèration Of the direction V. ' V V V V . ' V V V V • V : or rate of flow ,of ground waters? V V • VVV •< V • V V gr. ChangCVin the quantityoi • V V V V V V V • V V V V V ground waters, either through.. V direct additions or withdrawals, V V V or through interception of an •• .. V V V V V V aquifer by cuts or excavations9 h. Reduction in the amount of • V . V V , V V water otherwise available for • V V V public water supplies? V V V V V V V VVVVVVV:VVV : - V V V V VV •• V • V V • V 12- • V V . VVV V V Yes Maybe No 4 Plant Life Will the proposal have signi- ficant results in a. Change in the diversity of 'species, or 'numbers ofany species • of plants (including .trees, shrubs,' . '•. . grass, crops, microflora and. ..• . . •• ''.• . ' aquatic plants) b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? •. . '. . . . "_.; . , .. c. . Introduction of new species •' ' ' . . . ' ,. : •. '. of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- , . . . . . . . • . . -• '. ment of existing species? d Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?'. •, . ..... . ...... . " .'' S. Animal Life Will the proposal have signi- ficant results in a. Changes in the diversity of species.,' or numbers of, any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, bènthic , organisms, insects or inicrofauna)? b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or ,endangered . . . . .. .".. " . . . species of animal's.? ' . ' ' .• .:' . , • '.('. c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result : • • ' ' , .. in a barrier to the migration .or • , '• 5 '.' movement of animals? c. 'Deterioration to existing . S • '•' •.' ,,;5 ., ,. .., .5 fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise Will the proposal signi- 'f'icantly increase existing noise levels? 7 Light and Glare Will the pro- posal significantly produce new • S ': ' • ' , light or glare? 8 Land Use Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? -3- Yes Maybe No 9. Natural Resources. Will the pro- . ôsal Tave significant results in '. a. Increase in the rate of use. .• . . . •; . . . . of.any natural resources? . . . . b. Depletion,df any nonrenewable . . . natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal . . . . : involve a significant risk of an '• explosion or the release of haz- ' ardous substances (including, but not,liinited to, oil, pesticides, .. chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? .• ' , . , . ' . ' ' . 11. Pbpulätion. Will the propoal . .• ., •.•. , ' ' ' . 'significantly alter, the location, distribution, density, or growth • . . ' ' . rate of the human population of an area? . .'.. .'H •, Housing. Will . the proposal signi-' • .' .. ' . . •, ficantly affect existing housing, , .• •. or, create a demand for additional • ' . . ' ' housing , -- :TanspOrtat16n/c1u1ation. Will The proposal have significant re- ' ' • . ' ,sults in: ' ' . ' ' . .• •. - ' a..' Generation of additional. . vehicular movement? . . ' . . .• . b Effects on existing parking . ', • • • ' facilities, or demand for new' ' •.. . ' parking? ' C. Impact upon' existing trans- • . .portatioñ systems? •' ' • •' ' _'• • ' . ' d. Alterations to present • . ' . '' . . . patterns of circulation or move- ment of people and/or goods' e Alterations to waterborne, • ' . ' ' ' ' . • rail or ,air traffic? . , • :: ___,: •. ' ' ' • ' Increase in traffic hazards ' ' . . ' . . ' • • - , to motor vchiclesj bicyclists or. , ' . . '• ' ' '. pedestrians? ' • -4- Yes Maybe No 14 Public Services Will the pro- posal have a significant effect upon, or have significant results in the need for new or altered . governmental services in any of.-. the following areas a Fire protection' b Police protection? c Schools? S d. - Parks or other recreational . . . -. facilities?. . .. . .- . e Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? . f. Other governmental services? 15 Energy Will the proposal have significant results in a; Use of substantial amounts of . fuel or energy? • b. Demand upon existing sources . .. . of energy, or require. the develop- ment of new sources of energy? 16 Utilities Will the proposal have . . . significant results in the need for : • new systems, or. alterations to the - -- S •• - - S following utilities a Power or natural gas' b Communications systems' c, Water? d Sewer or septic tanks? e Storm water drainage'?.K f S61 id waste and disposal?.. 17 Human Health Will the proposal S • - have signigicant results in the S - - . 5 S • creation of any health hazard or . - 5 .5 - f5 - S•55 : • - .5 - S - potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? -5- . . ) Yes Maybe No 18 Aesthetics Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruc- tion of any scenic, vista or view 0 open to the public, or will the pro- . posal result in the creation of an . . . aesthetically offensive site open . . . 0 •. 0 to public, view? 19 Recreation Will the proposal have 0 , significant results in the impact' .. ,. 0 • 0 ' upon the quality or. quantity of, existing recreational opportunities?- 20. Archeo16ica1/Histori'cãl. Will the .. I proposal have significant results. 0 0 0 0 in-the alteration of a significant . archeological or historical site,''0 0 " :• structure, object or building? 21 ANALYZE VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS a) PHASED DE\'EJ OPMI N 1 01 THE PROJECT; .b),, AL"TRNATE SITE 0 0 0 •• 0 DESIGNS;. c) ALTERNATE SCALE OF .DEVELOPMENT; d) ALTERNATE 0 •. . USES FOR THE SITE; 'e). DEVELOPMENT AT SOME FUTURE TIME RATHER 0 0 0 0 • 0 • 'THAN NOW; f) 0 ALTERNATE-SITES FOR THE PROPOSED USE; g) NO • • PROJECT ALTERNATIVE (s ar scc~ ' .d4Sonty -6-