The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPE 2.86.44; CARLSBAD GREENPARK ONE; Engineering Application*27cI.-? Building Permit Plan Check No. Application for Grading Permit CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm Avenue 438.5541 PE NO. ______ Validation by Finance Department FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN Site Address Surety Company Bond No. 5E. CoRi)E OF PRIESTLy c. 4 tAEAD.4 ,4U(-. Legal Description Map No. Surety Address T124C1 9 1 -' o, 1_oT 6 LOT I I Subdivision Name Date Filed Rec'd by 4(LB,4D JJ,4g OIUE Owner Phone &(4J Cash deposit Rec'd by Date filed P,4L0M,1f 74fR1gai) A%ofATe 55 3—P // $ Owner's Address Cf 0 C,4L4 DG)E1.0pM (?U T, ZIVC . The following documents are required and shall become a part i83 op \jOA) 4 '44A) 4J St.)i r& 72.o of the grading permit when they are approved. Plans by Civil Engineer 4i IJC.E.'. 7 i7(2T &A),t AIT5 f=L 7 Grading plans Specifications Soil report Geologic Report Address I 4 JAIL -r. Phone (i iJfeRT iseA-CH.. nA. Drainage structures _____ Other Compaction report Soil Phone 657o Grading Contractor Phone SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE A PART OF THIS PERMIT Address Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday- Friday. Party responsible for overall supervision Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. Proposed use of grade site Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation control. Number of cubic yards Cut Fill Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per City Code. 72o 0 720o Proposed Schedule of Oc-T., Start jrLyI 79 Finish All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum Operations (dates) density unless noted otherwise. I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to 0 REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections this application. - listed below. S U CONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall Signature of Permittee observe work, coordinate tests, make reports. o 4.%J0VYO( T INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE Owner or authorized agent D"VAQ.i T. tCj!oj F Initial - site prep. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - Date 8,Vz../86 Rough- prior to drains EIA Log No. /::2..1 ;;4i__ By 9~ Final - slopes planted - Compaction reports rec' d. Grading permit fee $ Plan check fee $ Permit Issued Private engr. cert. rec'd. uy LJdt Copies: White-Office; Green-Building; S - Permit Expiration Date Yellow-Inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod-Finance THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED ISA PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD $ * J24 C 9" 0 ENGINEERING FEE: $175.00 - RECEIPT NO: 3f27 - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To Be Completed by APPLICANT) CASE NO: DATE: AUgust 6, 1986 Applicant: Greenpark Pacific Associates do Caliber Development, Inc. Address of Applicant: Attention: James R. Bosler 18300 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 720- Irvine, California 92715 Phone Number: (714 ) 553-9117 Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than ?pplicant): GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: Construct athree-story,.50,000 SF office building as the first phase of a master-planned development. Project Location/Address: Southeast corner of Priestly Drive and Faraday Avenue on Lots 6 & 11 of Tract 81-10. 212- 061 - 08 Assessor Parcel Number: 212 - 061 - 03 Zone of Subject Property: Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan Proposed Use of Site: Office building with at-grade parking areas, landscaping, and pedestrian walkway. S. - List all other applicable applications related to this project: Grading Permit Application Environmental Impact Assessments for grading permits must be accompanied with a gradina plan and qradinq Profile. 2. Describe the activityrea, including disti I guisho natural and man- made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate.; - The project site is presently vacant, and generally flat with a 1 - 2% gradient across both Lot 6 and Lot 11. The site was originally graded as part of the improvements for the Carlsbad Research Center, Tract 81-10. 3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. Reflective exterior building finishes Off-hour switch controls to limit use of lighting C. State of the art HVAC systems 4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. NOT APPLICABLE 5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. The 50,000 SF building will be occupied with offices. No retail sales areas or loading facilities are proposed. 6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. NOT -APPLICABLE S . 7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. NOT APPLICABLE -2- QSV I I. ENVIRONMENTAL Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (DISCUSS all items checked "yesTM. Attach additional sheets as necessary.) YES. NO Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? X Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? X Could the activity result in the displacement of. community residents? Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? X Could the activity decrease the number of low and . modest cost housing units in the city? Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? Could the activity significantly affect an . historical or archaeological site or its settings? Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? '.' . X Does the activity significantly affect the . potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? . X Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? . X Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activityarea? . . X Could the act-ivity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? . X Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? . . X Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination of agricultural lands? Could the activity serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed areas? -3- YES NO will the activity require a variance from established, environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? _______ will the activity require certification, authoriza- tionor issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environinental.control agency? x will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? x Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? X will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? X Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? X 23) Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? X 24) Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? X 25) Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? X 26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other matrials? X 27) Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) X 28) will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? X 29) Will there'be a significant change to existing X land form? Indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards: Percentige of alteration to the present land form: Maximum heig _ ht of cut or fill slopes: 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger x project or series of projects? -4- STATEMENT OF NON- NIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ACTS If you have-answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: 16. The construction of' this building could encourage development of some support uses such as restaurants and office supplybusinessés. Such developments would serve much more than this building, so it is not significant by itself. Also, any development within Tract 81-10 must come under the requirements of the Carlsbad Research Center Specific Plan.- 31. The three-story office building to heconstructed is the first of 5 two lots. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) Signature (Person Completing Reporj Emmei' Be'kery - Director, Development Engineering Date Signed August 6, 1986 -5- S. S ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES 1401 Quail Street Newport Beach, California 92660-2748 Costa Real Municipal Water District Engineering Department (619) 438-3367 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Revised February 12, 1987 December 15, 1986 JN 23521/L4 Page 1 of 1 CARLSBAD GREENPARK WATERLINE EASEMENT That portion of.Lot 6 of Carlsbad Tract No. 81-10, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, as shown on a map thereof filed as Map No. 10330 in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, California, describedas follows: PARCEL 1 A strip of land 15.00 feet wide, the centerline of which is described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on a curve in the northwesterly line of said Lot 6, said curve being concave northwesterly and having a radius of 742.00 feet, said point being distant along said curve northeasterly 2.13 feet through a central angle of 0°09'53 from the northwesterly corner of said Lot 6, a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 27°37'36 West; thence South 71031I22u East 31.90 feet; thence South 39030l48u East 230.23 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point A°; thence continuing South 39°30'48 East 126.50 feet. Also, beginning at the aforementioned Point "A"; thence North 50°29'12" East 40.50 feet; thence North 39030'48" West 19.50 feet. Said first described strip of land shall be lengthened or shortened so as to terminate northwesterly in the northwesterly and southwesterly lines of said Lot 6. PARCEL 2 A strip of land 10.00 feet wide, the northeasterly line of which is described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on a course in the northwesterly line of said Lot 6 shown as "North 50029'12" East 135.10 feet" on said map, said point being distant along said course South 5002911211 West 3.00 feet from the northeasterly terminus thereof; thence South 39°30'48" East 8.00 feet. SUBJECT TO all Covnants, Rights, Rights-of-Way and Easements of Record. EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. LAND So~~ e€ J Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 * I' 'I k \ EXHIBIT 'B' SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CARLSBAD GREENPARK WATERLINE EASEMENT. 6R.gbezl cBeizl,cWilliampzest , ç.54ssociatcs PROFESSIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS A PLANNERS P.O 805 2590 • IOI OUAL STREET. NEWPORT DEACII, CALIFORNIA 92663 A 7I2 833.0070 RV 2/i2/7 DATE SCALE FIELD BOOK JOB NO. DEC. ,986 1 1 23521 CITY OF CARLSBAD .1 ENGINEERING. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND DEPOSITS WORKSHEET S •. PREPARED BY: PROJECT NAME P1 E. 2 .. 8 44 DATE tO - Z4,- TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FEE MAP FEE ( _. LOTS)(PARCEL. MAP1FINAL MAP NO. OF LOTS _____)•. , . __________________ (EXPEDITED/NOT EXPEDITED) PARCEL MAP EXTENSION FEE . . . . . . . • . __________________ IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK FEE DEPOSIT WITH SUBMITTAL RECEIPT NO IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION BONDED VALUE TOTAL X 0 PERCENTAGE - IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION FEE ITEM VALUE TOTAL X PERCENTAGE PARK-IN-LIEU. FEE (CIRCLE ONE): . .• • . • - . S . DWELLING TYPE: SF OR DUPLEX MF (<4 UNITS) MF. (>4 UNITS) MH AREA: .1 2.3 4 NUMBER OF UNITS X AREA FEE/UNIT STREET LIGHT ENERGIZING : 5,800 LUMEN: AT 81.00 = . S 9.500 LUMEN AT 111.06 = 16.000 LUMEN AT 152.10 20,000 LUMEN AT 169.38 . TOTAL: GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE DEPOSIT RECEIPT NO. (EXPEDITED/NOT EXPEDITED) . . . GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE ( ___00 CUBIC YARDS) . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .:. 2. GRADING CASH DEPOSIT. . . . . . . • • • • • . • . . . . . . ... .. DUPLICATE TRACING FEE . . STREET SIGN DEPOSIT: . . . . . .5 . .. AT. AT •=. . . AT TOTAL: . . ... = . . STREET STRIPING DEPOSIT . . •. . . ... . . . . ... . . • • . • . . . • . FRONT. LINE OR AREA FEES (TYPE. ) . . • ... .5 .. . . • .. • • . DRAINAGE AREA FEE (AREA NO. .... • . • . . • . . . . . . • • • • TOTAL ACRES: ________ x AREA FEE S. LESS VALUE OF MASTER DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS . AS NOTED IN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN DOCUMENTS • . . . . MULTIPLIED BY CURRENT INFLATION FACTOR. . LTNc VI hF X FACTOR = AMOUNT x ____ = ____ .. •. X S TOTAL DRAINAGE FEE DUE ADDITIONAL FEES: TYPE - • • • , ______________________________ TYPE___________________________________________ , • • • . TOTAL FEES AND DEPOSITS • . ___________________ (IN ADDITION, A GRADING PERMIT FEE OF JS .DUE UPON ISSUANCE OF THE GRADING PERMIT.) . . . S •