The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPE 2.87.09; BROOK OLSEN/HOOVER; Engineering ApplicationS L ,4iw' /A1 'va. 7- Building Permit Plan Check No. FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN Application for Grading Permit CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm Avenue 43&5544- PE NO. e Validation by. Finance Department <I Site Address ..Sth'eteUmparry Bond No Hoover St. and Adams St • 77f,6- Legal Description Map No. £tteP' Address Lot 1, Block A of Bella Vista 2152 ,g J,,F? Subdivision Name Minor Subdivision No. 730 / PUD-255 Date Filed Rec'd by 1j,g1 q87 Owner Phone asb-ec,it Rec'd by Date filed Brook D. Olsen 4340036 Owner's Address The folloing documents are required and shall become a part 3910 Sierra Morena, Carlsbad, CA 92008 of the grading permit when they are approved. I"' Grading plans Specifications "Soil report Geologic Report V Drainage structures _____ Other Compaction report Plans by Civil Engineer R.C.E. . Joseph K. Lukoski, P.E. 27542 Address Phone 729-4340 P.O.Box 1733, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Soil Engineer R.C.E. Phone Herald R. Lantis, 33220 741-0533 Grading Contractor Phone SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE A PART OF THIS PERMIT Address /1/0 f. Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday- Friday. Party responsible for overall supervision Brook D. Olsen Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. Proposed use of grade site Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation control. Three (3) building pads Number of cubic yards Cut Fill .. Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per City Code. 2,800 1,900 . 900, All fills to be A0 J Proposed Schedule of Start Finish Operations (dates) - density unless noted otherwise. I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have proiided is correct and agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, and the provisions-and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: - - LI REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections this application. listed below. CONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall Signature of Permittee ( observe work, coordinate tests, make reports. A&M INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE Owner or authorized Initial - site prep. ENVIRONMENTALCLEARANCE - Date 4/ /B1 EIA Log No. - 3-7-09 By Rough - priortodrains 7/1/77 & Final - slopes planted Compaction Compaction reports rec'd. , Grading permit fee Plan check fee $ Private engr. cert. rec'd. _________________________________ _______________________________________________________ Permit Issued - - — . n — .!-1 - by ________________________________ uate ' ' ' Copies: White-Office; Green-Building; (I / Permit Expiration Date 7- e7 Yellow-Inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod-Finance THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD 15 Sewer Capacity 16 _Soil Erosion 17 -Solid Waste 18 Toxic/Hazardous 19 Traffic/Circulation 20 _Vegetation - 21 Water Quality 22 Water Supply 23Wetland/Rlparlan 24 Wildlife 25 Growth Inducing 26 Incompatible Landuse 27 Cumulative Effects 28 Other csau to: b-tate LIer!IgflOuse, Luu !enn treet, oii. iL, Sacramento, CA 95814 -- 916/445-0613 See NOTE Below NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND ENVIRONME.'crAl. DOCUMENT FORM SCH Project Title: M5730/PUD255 -Lead-Agency: __('.1 ty nf Ca rl sbc1 Contact Person:Edward Ruiz 3a. Street Address: -2075 LaG -Pa1ma 3b. city:Car-lsb-ad 3c. County: San Diego 3d..Zip: 92009 3e. Phone: __(619)_438-1161 PROJECTL0CATt 4. County:San Diego . Carlsbad 4b.(optional) Assessor's Parcel No. /7 0 0 / 4c. Section %p. Range________________ 5a. Cross Streets: ii f PAM .S - 5b. For Rural, Nearest Community: 6. Within 2 miles of: a. .State Hwy No. _5 b. Airports c. Waterways________________________ I. DOCUMENT TYPE 8. LOCAL ACTION TYPE 01 General Plan Update Dl NOP 02 New Element 02 Early Cons 03 _General Plan Amendment 03 XNeg Dec - 04 _Master Plan 04 Draft EIR _ 05 _Annexation 05 _Supplement/ 06 Specific Plan -. Subsequent EIR (if so, prior SCH 07 _Redevelopment 08 _Rezone NEPA- - - - 09 Land Division TBi1vision, Parcel Map, 06 _Notice of intent - Tract Map, etc.) 07 Envir. Assessment/ 10 Use Permit FONSI 11 Cancel Ag Preserve 08 Draft EIS - - .. 12 X. Other PUD OTHER 09 Information Only - 9. TOTAL ACRES: 10 Final Document 11 Other_____________________ 11. - PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT- 01 Aesthetic/Visual 08 Geologic/Seismic 02 _Agricultural Land 09 _Jobs/Housing Balance 03 _Air Quality 10 Minerals 04 __Archaeological/Histor1cal 11 _Noise 05 _Coastal 12 Public Services 06 Fire Hazard 13 _Schools 07 Flooding/Drainage - 14 Septic Systems 10. DEVELOPMENT TYPE - - 01 Residential: Units Acres - 02 Office: Sq.Ft. - Acres -. Employees__________________ 03 Shopping/Commercial: Sq.Ft._____________________ Acres Employees________________ 04 Industrial: Sq.Ft. - - Acres _Employees_______________ 05 Sewer: MGD______________________________________ 06 - Water: MGD _-- 07 Transportat1on: Type 08 Mineral Extraction: Mineral_______________________ 09 Power Generation-. Wattage. Type: ---- -- - 10 Other: FUIIDING(approx.) Federal State S Total S PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING: ooO - - 14. PROJECT •JESCIPTiON: A four unit minor subdivison requiring 3,700 -cubic yards of -,grading (2-1 800 cubic yards cut, 900 cubic yards fill. - 15. SIGNATURE OF LEAD AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: Date - - NOTE: Clearinghouse ill assigr identification numbers for all new projects. If a SC.9 Number already exists for a project. (e.g. from a Notice of Preparation or previous draft cocc1ent) please fill It in. 0 FEE: $175.00 RECEIPT NO: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To Be Completed by APPLICANT). CASE NO: DATE: Jan. 28, 1987 Applicant: Brook D. Olsen A. Address of Applicant: 3910 Sierra Morena, Carlsbad, CA 92008 - Phone Number: ( 619 ) 3-0036 - Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: 3 Lot PUD Project Location/Address: S.W. corner of Hoover and Adams Street. Assessor Parcel Number: 206 -. 170 - 01 Zone . of Subject Property: .R-1-35,000 Proposed Use of Site: 3 single family dwellings Li-TLLI List all other applicable applications related to this project: Coastal PexitAppliat±on' # 6-86-407 • c / 2.. Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man- made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. Natural slope approx. 10% to 12% to be cut into 3 building pads. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. Dual glassing and insulation of building If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 3 D.U., approx.;.3000s.f., owner occupy, $350,000, family size ' to 5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. N/A , If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and 'loading facilities. • ' 'N/A ' 7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated. occupancy,' loading facilities, and community benefits to bederived from the project. ' N/A •, -2- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessary.) YES NO Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? 94 Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? X Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? x COuld the activity result in the displacement of community residents? . . x Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? . X Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? x Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? . x Could the activity significantly affect an historical or archaeological site or its settings? X Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? . ' x Does the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? . . X Could the, activity significantly affect fish,, wildlife or plant life? , X Are there any rare 'or endangered plant species in the activity area? X Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? x Could the 'activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? X 15), Could the activity result in the erosion or , elimination of agricultural lands? X ' 16) Could the activity serve to encourage development ' of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed areas? -3- H ... YES.NO 17) Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? X 18) Will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? x 19) Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? x 20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? x 21) Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? X 22) Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? . X 23) Will the activity involve construction of . facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? X 24) Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? . . . X' 25) Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? X 26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? . X 27) Could the activity result in a significant change • in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water; off-shore.) . . X 28) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? X 29) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? X. -. Indicate estimated grading to be done in . cubic yards: C-2,800, F-900 Percentage of alteration to the present land form: .90 %. . (C) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes: . Cut 9 1 ,, incl. exist. slope max. 16' . 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains-or streets? . X ' 31) Is the activity carried out as'part of a larger . project or series of projects? . , X -4- I STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or moreof the questions in Section L but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: NONE COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN -SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) - Signature I//U / V (Person Completing Report) Josfph K. Lukoski, P.E. Date Signed Feb. _6,1987 . S 5•5 • .5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. B7. DATE: I. BACKGROUND 5 . APPLICANT: __cbck ADDRESS AND PHONENUMBER OF APPLICANT: DATE CHECKLIST SUBMITTED: 2-7 _________________________________ II.. ENV IRONMENTALIMPACTS (Eplanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section III Discussion ofEnvironmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE • NO 1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? Disruptions,displacernents, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? Change in topography or ground • surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a S river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? . S • LV J H' • YES MAYBE NO 2. Air *-Will the proposal have significant results in: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature., or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? . 0 ' 0 Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Discharge' into surface waters, ' or 'in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature', dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ' Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quaritityof ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals,.or, through • interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public 0 water supplies? ' -2- YES MAYBE NO. 4. Plant. Life Will the proposal have significant results.iri: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? . . Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?¼ - Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioratjon.to existingfish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing. noise levels? x 7. Light -and Glare - Will the proposal sig- .nificantly produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use - Wilithe proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? . . f . . YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources- Will the proposal have significant results in: Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the releaseof hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)in the eventof an accident Or upset conditions? 11. Population.- Will the. proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or H create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation -Will the proposal have significant results in: Generation of additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parking facilit- ies, or demand for new parking? C. Impact -upon existing transporation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? . f. Increase in traffic hazards to • motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 4 S YES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? C. Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Other governmental services? 15. Energy - Will the proposal have signif- icant results in: Use of substantial amounts of fuel or. energy? Demand upon existing sources of energy, or. require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: Power or natural gas? f.. Communications systems? C. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e.. Storm water drainage? • f. Solid waste and disposal? . 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have . significant results in the creation of . any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? -5- • 0~ S YES MAYBE NO Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Archeological/Historical Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs-, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alternate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. ç\or\ 3 * b rec di,s -m CO 51 - Ld P1e $& 4be o -\ vb c3sn foy c c X\c if cq Uic ec) J(i J~ 60Q (70'of\ I (\61 presecH )r-d&ec3 cot b+j 62C1 bu 'nc ôre c cr • +n Cac t j t -6- . YES MAYBE NO 22. Mandatory.Findings of Significance - Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? . Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) . V C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?. (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) • d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION a 3cad ct 24B eubc c,c -- 9c0kc . ëo \L -e WA))cX? c\h\1Q $WOJOS Q_Oc-~-,~yr ! m.dc uethkc bi ded b te oPn CL) $Li 1\ci eibcck o4c) CC61TS oç cdy tHth* DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) a h\ -c pleoc a-cs t'fl. Thm& al'oj Ile &~el tjtC9-A+ SOi1 d 4he ca e U [e-o i t CCA ( 1SCQS. 1c \&dcce p\c ecl+ V~ -the ji-a d tsar ±h 'i 04 tx? S Ill b i des Adic1/y Ij Ib1CtId e cp4Ao- 4-S -Ae 4a- 1 is Al I 7/7 p or4i-i I c77 0(7 ( ,dLd frd , e -8- DETERMINATION (To Be Completed by the Land Use Planning Office)' On the basis of this initial evaluation: find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on TTTthe environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project 'could have 'a significant ''effect on the environment, there will not be a significanteffect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have' been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,' and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable) - - -9- - * *