The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPE 2.87.36; LA COSTA ESTATES NORTH LOT 26; Engineering ApplicationSoil Engineer 5'4 rn Grading Contractor R.C.E. Phone Phone AdP V . ~a S Party responsible for overall supervision Proposed use of grade site Number of cubic yards Cut R7eJd Import Zdl* Waste 0,0 Fill Proposed Schedule, of Start Finish Operations (dates)* _VA.el Owner one ~2 — Owner's Address Olans by Civil Engine , 6r kol/ Aw. Address , . A.C.E. i5594"C' - Phone . ' 1#1 -46'9-37 oil Application for Grading Permit PENO.:2-62,3. CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APN .Ak Building Permit Plan C heck No. i zuu cirn Avenue 438,6644 -a SZTZ) Validation by Finance - Department 0008 10/22 0101 Misc. 215-00 Site Address 9f119 W14A~ Legal Description Z-0 T Ze, i Subdivision Name FOR APPLICANT TO FILL I Map No. -f -30 7, QUICLY 1,U111pally e'*4 - 'f2V?17 Surety Address Date Fil ed Cash'deposit Recd by Datefile'd 165-0 10-7 The following documents are required and shall Acome,a part of the grading permit when they are approved. Grading plans _Z7SI:iecificatio~s :3~oil report, Geologic Report _Slrainage structures Other Compaction' report SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE A PARTOF THIS PERMIT 1. Authorized hours o opera on: 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday. 2.:.*- Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. Adequate provisions shall be made. for eros ion zifid siltation control. All slopes shall be planted per City Code. All fills to be compacted t o at -least 90% of optimum density unless noted otherwise. I hereby. acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to complywith all City ordinances and State.laws regulating excavating and grading, Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to 0 REGULARGRADING - City inspector will make inspections r this application. listed below. XCONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall. Signature of Permittee observe work, coordinate tests, make reports. Owner or authorized. ageL004el, INSPECTION PAffJ;~-9-9 —,—_-,LN Sp. S N AT U R E Initial - site prop.. ENVIRONMENTAL KJ ARANCE.- Date le9AW11,f Rough - prior to drains EIA Log.N6. PZ- 2. 3 7Z__ 1 - I Final -'slopes planted By Compaction reports rec -Gradin ermit fee $ Plan chj?~.fq,e $ 0~0 'L W _.. IF C 7 rec'd. Permit Private -engr.,cert. b r)atp 7 Copies: White-Office; G ree Perm i4/Xpi r;ation =Dato Yelliow-Inspe' ctor; Pink-Permittm Goldenrod- F i nance 16 Aft-WXY 406V77Z_1 THIS FORM WHEN15,ROPEF1e0VALIDATtD ISA PERMITTO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED THIS PERMIT IS,VALID FOR A:SIX.(6) MONTH PERIOD 1200 ELM AVENUE TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1969 (619) 4384ul Office of the City Engineer Car of Carlobab TO: BUILDING DEPARTMENT- FROM: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: -7 7. 3 ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL FOR PROJECT NO. (TRACT or P.E. #) ,Nf c6i 5. F D. 291-1 I-1ax-aa&tx Fl. (PROJECTNAME AND ADDRE9) A;qccl -74-3-3 'Sn~zno (DEVELOPER'S NAME AND ADDRESS) We have inspected the grading for loV 10 9302- - or phase of the above mentioned project. In addition, we.have received rough grading certification from 14 L La ii 111A tne 4-- the Soils Engineer, dated /Vey. 2.1987 , and from ///..., and are satis- the Supervising Grading Engi,neer,, dated NoV, &Z fied that the rough grading has been 'completed in accordance with City standards. Based on these certifications and our observation, we take no exception to the issuance of a building permit for lotfi 2,6 or phase of project P, 6 from a grading 2,,97.3 standpoint. This release, however, is not intended to certify the project from other engineering concerns fncluding site devel.opment, water or sewer availability, or final grading. Prior to the issuanceof a certificate of occupancy, we need to be advised so that we can verify that final grading and landscaping,has been complet- ed in accordance with the approved plans for the project. APPROVED: Project G~/ading I-nspector Sr. Construction Inspector cc: Developer ENGINEERING FEE: $175.00 RECEIPT NO: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To Be Completed by APPLICANT) C ASE NO: Y 7 DATE: 9-2/47 Applicant: z2o't/ /'sz <-- - - Address of Applicant: Z.5f.?',j -5- P h o n e N u m b e r Name, address And phone-number of person to be contacted (if.other than Applicant): GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project,: Project Location/Address: Assessor Parcel Number": Zone of Subject Property: Proposed,Use of Site: List all other applicable applications related to this.project: Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man- made characteri.stics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. e,-'e ,,,, '9':~ Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the.design and/or operation of the project. vezr,6z;c -1,4z. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. / - e/) 4117' If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, 'and loading facilities. If ind ' ustrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. If institutional, indicate the.major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,, and community benefits to be derived from'the'project. -2- 0 0 9 1 . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer,the following questions by placing a check in the . appropriate space . (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessary.) YES NO Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in.the city? Are any of the natura1 .or man-made, features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county,. state or nation? V Could the activity sign-ificantly affect an historical or archaeological site or its settings? Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a. scarce natural resource? Does the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? Are there any rare or endangered plant species J_ in the activity area? Could the activity change existing features of , any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? Could the activity result in the erosion or .elimination of agricultural lands? Couid the activity serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed-areas? -3- 1 ) 0 YES NO Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, f . noise, etc.)? Will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the -City? Will the activity invol - ve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? Will the activity involve -construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? Could the ac ' tivity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? Could the activity result in the generat-ion of significant amounts of dust? Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? Could the activity result in.a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water,resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) .28) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity,'oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? Indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards: 2_7.1~pla Percentage of a Iteration to the present land form: Maximum height of cut or fil-1 slopes: ~2 - 1. -5&0010 .3 - , 4 Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? Is the activity carried out as part of a larger . project or series of projects? - W_~; " 4-- -4- _: 05- STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICA14T ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you thi,nk the activity will have no significant envir-onmental effects, indicate your reasons below: E COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) Signature( (Person Completing Report Date Signed- -2~f —;5"2 - C;- COLJFTY OF SAN Dlr&GO DEPARTMENT Or PLANNING AND LAND USE 'T 1'N Zo ic- C, 0 'a) C E C CODES DIVISION SAN DIEGO OFFICE NORTH COUNTY OFFICE RETURN M: 5201 Ruffin Road, Suite B3 El 334 Via Vera Cruz San Diego, CA 92123 San Marcos, CA 92069 565-5920 741-4236 Project Location "&9)S "NAGUA 'PLACE Name of Permittee ; DAN IEL 1312 CA 1Z Lee BA D AA_ Grading Permit No. 'Fliis report form for a "mitior" grading project is to be completed and signed by tile Registered Civil Engineer(or Architect) who has been designated oil tile Grading Pian and Permit as the Eiigincer who will furnish the.compaction report for work authorized by a grading permit issued by the Depart'nient of Planning and Land Use. 'I'lie intent of (lie formal is to prov ' ide infornialion lo-the Department of Planningand Land Use as to grading compliance with the approved Grading, ['fail and Perniii. Where the questions below refer to location, configuration or quantity of cut and/or fill areas, it is understood that your response will not normally be based op all actual land survey or detailed earthwork quantity calculations. It should be noted, however, Iliat tile Department is particularly concerned where there are possible infractions with respect to over-steepened slopes, encroachments of required setbacks, unconipacted fills placed, or where the quantity of fill placed differs substantially from that authorized. 'I'lle Department o[Planningand Land USC FCqUlres that all ' fillsauthorized bya Grading Permit becompacted toa minimumof 90% ofmaxinium density with the exception I hill not more than 12" of uncompacted and untested fills may be dispersed over the land parcel. "I'lie need to compact if[ lills that are beyo nd lite present limits ofthe present proposed construction is to insurethat Ititure proposed construction of rooln additions or- swimming pools or similar structures will not require that-uncompacwd fills be removed or recompacted, or that extensive foundation work be installed. Compaction reports will not be accepted unless this form is completed and signed by the registered person. A. COMPA'FIBILITY WITH GRADING PLAN AND PERMIT I . Was the compacted fill placed only in tile approximate locations designated oil tile grading'pian as areas to be filled'? Yes No Did tile quantity of' fill material placed approximately conform to lite grading plan? Yes J-' No- Did the toe of' fill or lite top of cut appear to ineet the prescribed property line setback ( 1.5' lot- fill; 3.0' for cuts)? Yes No Were lite finished fill slopes equal to or less than 2 horizontal to I vertical'? Yes No If' the fill material was obtakied 1)), cuts oil the site, were the cuts made in tile proper location and to lite proper slopeapproxiinalcly.as shown oil tile approved grading piall? Yes, No Were brow ditches constructed approximately its shown oil the grading plan? Yes k"' No, B. LOCAI'10N AND AMOUNI' 01-- COMPACTION 1-ESTS Have you attached a sketch and data showing the location and relative elevation for all compaction tests'? Yes No Was a compaction test made so that (here is at least one test in each 2' thicklens of compacted material'? Ye s No- As indicated by inspections, observations and compaction test results, was the fill, excluding the top Iff, compacted. to at least 90% of' maximum dry density'? Yes No— C. OUALFFY Ol~ IALL COMPACI ION OPERA'FION Was the area to receive fill properly prepared in terms of brush removal, benching, wetting, removal of noncompacted fill, or debris and related items? 2. Was all detrimentally expansive soil placed in the fill at 3' or more below finish grade? Have you attached a copy Ofyollf CUrve showing (lie relationship between optimum moisture content and maximum density'? Was all material used as fill (earth, rocks, gravel) smaller than 12" in size'? Are all areas of the fill suifablefor support of'structures? Were all existing fills on lite site recompacted in accordance widi the provisions of the grading oidinance? Yes No— Yes No -AW 1eJFA0l41Zkt Yes No— Yes P-' No Yes ~-' No Yes I--' No