HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.87.44; PALOMAR OAKS; Engineering Applicationj1k)
Building Permit Plan Check No.
Application for Grading Permit
Cl TY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1200 Elm Avenue
438-55411 3S'~YO
—*"!r
PE NO.
,JPAJ.21.3-01f1-11DV' "'
.20 - oel'? qyWS-,
Validation by Finance
Department
FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN
Site Address Surety Company f- o~& Bond No.
PALOMAR OAKS WAY, CARLSBAD, CA. d4!iW-BURN1w+e&ffQQ/21 01'0r_%ftk!!~~
Legal Description Map No. Surety Address A-&-77-E-19 1-'- &-141*
LOTS 9 - 19 (CARLSBAD TRACT 80-38) MAP NO. 1o198 -1,61e, WES- AS" SX., SAN BIEG9-,-"_ 92301-
Subdivision Name Date Filed Rec'd by
MADISON SQUARE DEVELOPMENT f~ eO, 'L65 4(,:;L ~- 3 —.* -7 111Pt1`;*
Owner Phone Cash deposit Rec'd by Date filed
MADISON
%
SQUARE DEVELOPMENT 11 (619) 560-7622. $3336-57 /0-/.(/ / ;X -g-e 7
Owner's Address i: The following documents ~re required and shall become a part
4223 PONDEROSA AVE., SAN.DIEGO, CA. 92123 of the grading permit when they are approved.
Grading plans Specifications Plans by Civil Engineer HENRY WORLEY, R.C.E.
HENRY WORLEY ASSOCIATES #18673 Soil report Geologic Report
Drainage structures Other Address 7875 CONVOY COURT,. SUITE A-PlIone
SAN DIEGO, CA. 92111 — (619) 571 -7728. Compaction report
Soil Engineer R.C.E. Phone
ACTION-GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS. (714)6307,9334
Grading Contractor Phone SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE
MADISON SQUARE 56o-7622 A PART OF THIS PERMIT
Address Authorized hours of operation:
4223 PONDEROSA AVE. SAN DIEGO, CA. 92123 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday.
Party responsible for overall supervision
Haul routes are to be approvedby City Engineer.
Proposed use of grade site
INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL OFFICE SITE Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation
control. Number of cubic yards ()
Cut Fill Import Jvaste 4~5
4, All slopes shall be planted per City Code.
No 6 1-,o Z. . .4,9_40f I _frj,~'d JACJ
4a, 000 45;11000 0 Lo 1997 A A"'C 4-114 Alf a:: .4;p- ew
Proposed Schedule of ~ia`irt pj)~ ~4. Finish f~? 1 ~ ~0 V I 8
5. All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum
Operations (dates) NO 7 iVJ/1~41#'/O'AN !8P~/ density unless noted otherwise.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state tha
e, Iv \11Z - 'it "it - the information I have provided is correct and agree,to comply~vv h ~<~Z 9 ti,%; ->-
Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavati'ng-and,grading,
and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to 0 REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections
this application. ji1ted below.
ErCONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall
Signature of Permittee rA observe work, coordinate tests, make reports.
INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE
Owner or authorized agent
Initial - site prep.
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE -
Rough drains - prior_to Date 2"
EIA'Log No.?,C 871~+
-F (P By A;Z . Final - slopes p -
compaction reports rec'd. Grading permit fee $ 3d-, 4 Plan check fee $ 15,9
Private engr. cert. rec'd. Permit Issued A
by of. Date a!~- 74".,7 - I— een-Building; V Copies: White-Office; Gr
Permit Expiration Date Yellow-inspector; Pink-Permittee; Gold2Knce
,=7X
TH IS FORM WHEN PROPER LY VALI'DATED IS A PERM I~ TO'DO TH E WOR K DESCR I BED
THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD
MINORING
F;7 z
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM PART II
(TO BE,COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. PIP 87-3
2 -3(0 - S X DATE:
BACKGROUND
APPLICANT: Madison ScruAke Development
ADDRESSAND PHONE.NUMBER OF APPLICANT': 4223 Ponderosa Avenue A
San Diego, CA 92123
DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: March.21, 1968
II. -ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers'are to be,written under Section III Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAYBE NO
1 Earth Will the proposal
have significant results in:
,a. Unstable earth conditions
or in changes in.*-ge6logic. substructures? X
Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering
of the soil? X
Change in topography or ground*
surface relief features? _X
The destruction,. covering of
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features? X
e.-Any increase iri wind or water
erosion of soils,'either on or.
off the site? X
f.,Changes~in deposition 'or-erosion
of beach,sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify.the channel or a
river or stream;or the bed of the,
ocean or any bay - inlet or lake? X
YES MAYBE NO
2. Air Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a.Air emissions.or deterioration
of'ambient air quality? X
bl. The creation of objectionable
odorsl X
c. Alteration of air movement,
moisture ortemperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally? X
3. Water Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Changds in currents, or the course
or direction of,water movements,
in either marine.or fresh waters? X
Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patters, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff? X
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters*5 X,
Change'in the amount of surface
water in any water body?' X
Discharge into surface waters,,
or*in any alteration of'surface
~water qualityl.including but not
limited to, temperature,,~dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? X
Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters> -X
Change.in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations? X
h.~ Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies? X
-2"
YES MAYBE' NO
.4 Plant Life Will,the'proppsal
have significant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
Pr numbers of any species. of plants
Oncludin4 trees, shrubs, grass,
crops t micr6florA.-and aquatic plants).?
., x
b.-,Reduction of the numbers of'any unique,, rare or endangered species
of plants?
x
C.. Introduction of newspecies of 'plants
into.an area, -or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species?
x
d. Reduction,in acreage of~any,'
agricultura1crop?
x
5. Animal Life Will the proposal'have
significant results in:
Changes in the diver*ity.of species,.
or numbers of any species.of-animials Abirds, land. animals including reptiles:,- .fish and shellfish', benthic*organisms,
,',, insects or microfauna)?
x
Reduction-of the -numbers of any.uniqu6,,
rare or,6ndangered species of animals?
x
c..Introduction of hew species of animals
into an'area,,orresult.in abarrier ,. to the migration or movement of
animals?
x
d. Deterioration to existing, fish'or —wildlife habitat?
6. Noise will :the proposal significantly
increase existing'noise levels?
x
7. Light And Glare --Will the proposal'sig-
nificantly produce new light or glare7 x .8. Land Use, Will the proposal have
significant.results in-the alteration of the . -present, or planned land.use of an~ area?,
x
-3-
YES MAYBE NO
9.- Natural Resources Will the propo!~al
have significant results in
a. Increase'in,the rate of use of,any
natural resources? X
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable'
natural resource?,, X_
Risk of Ups6t - Does the proposal
involve a,significant risk of an
explosion or the release,of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pestic*ides~.-chemicals or
radiation) in the event-of an accident
or upset conditions? X
Population - Will the proposal signif—
icantly alterthe location, distribu-
tion, density, or growth rate of.the
human Population of an area? X
~Housing Will the proposal signif-
icantly affect existing housing, or
create a demand for.additional housing?, _X
Trans~ortationlCirculatio'n Will the
proposal -have'significant results in:
a. Gen6rationof additional vehicular
movement? X
b. -Effects on existing parking faQ'ili-
ties, or demand for n.ew'parking? X
c. Impact upon existing transportation
systems' X
d. Alterations to present*patterns of
circulation or movement.of people
and/or goods? X
e. Alterations to waterbornet rail or
air traffic?- X
f._Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? X
-4-
.
.
0
YES MAYBE .-NO
-14. Public Services Will the-proposal have. a significant'effect upon, or have slignif-icant.-resuits inthe need for new or
altered governmental services in any of
the following'areas:
a. Fire protection?
b.. Police protection?
Schools?
Parks or.other recreational
facilities?
Mai ntenance of public facilitiesi including roads?
Other governmental services?
15. Energy Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Use of substantial-amounts of fuel
or energy?
Demand upon existing sources of
,energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
1 A TT+- i I i +. Wi I I +.h= naml hAXT=
significant results in the need for new
systems, or alterations to the'.following
utilities:
a.'Power or natural gas?.
communications systems?
c Water?
Sewer or septic tanks?
Storm water drainage?
Solid waste and disposal?
17. Human Health Will'the proposal have
significant results in.the creation of
any health hazard or potential health
hazard (excluding mental health)?
X
X
-5-
YES MAYBE NO
.18. Aesthetics Will the proposal.have
significant results in the'obstruction'
of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the'proposal result in'
creation of an aesthetically.offensive
public view? X
Recreation - Will
-
the proposal'have
significant results in the impact upon
the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? X
Archeological/Historical Will the.
proposal have significant results,in
the alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site..
structure,.object,or building? X
21., Analyze viable alternatives to the 'Proposed project such.as: J
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, _c) alternate scaleof development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate~sites for the proposed-I and g) no project alternative.
Project cannot be phased.
Project will undulate manmade slopes to blend with natural
slopes*as required by Hillside Development Regulation 21.95.
N/A *
N/A
Would expose slope to failure in the,interim.,,
N/A
Would expose slope to failure.
: M.
E 0
YES MAYBE NO'
22. 'Mandatory findinas of significance
Does the project have-the potential
to'degrade the quality of the
environment, or curtail the diversity
in the environment?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve-short-term, to the dis-'
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure lwell into the future,.)
.c. Does the project have impacts which -,
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A
project may impact on two'or more ,.separate resources where the impact,
on each.resource is relatively small,
but.where the effect of the.total of
those impacts'on'the environment is
.Significant.)
d Does the project have environmental
effects which will'cause substantial
adverse.effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONME14TAL EVALUATION
la. In the short-term maybe. The proposal will
eliminate a potentially unstable geologic-condition
landslide for the long-term.
1b. The proposal will remove and reco m~pabt soil. on a slope.
4. The proposal will remove 'naturalized landscaping
and replant with' hyproseeding similar landscape
materials.
18. The proposal will disturb A highly visible landscape hillside As. conditioned, landscaping_
will.guarantee aesthetic mitigation.~
.20. The proposal will intrude into an are
'
a of potential
paleontological significance. As. conditioned,
impacts on -paleontological resources will be
mitigated.
-7-
I
x
x
—X
r_%
IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Compl6ted By-The Planning Department)
on the basis of this initi~i evaluation:'
I 'find the propos ed project COULD NOT have'a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X I'find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment,.there will not.be a significant*eifect in
this-case because the mitigation measures described on an attached,
sheet h , ave .be;Bn added,to-the project'.. A Condi tional Negative Declaration will be proposed.
I find the,pr6posed project MAY have' a significant effect on'the
environment, and.an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTREPORT is required.
I
F~_7_9_S6, --*.r-
* Date . I
%. ,Signature
0
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
1. Prior to the certificati6n,of final grading, the P I lanning Director or his representative shall field inspect slope grading to assure
all, grading operations ha
'
ve been conducted as proposed and that
the finished slope grading -conforms to plans submitted 3/21/88, and Carlsbad's Hillside Development Regulations.
2.~ Both prior to c6rtiiication of the.landscaping 'system adjacent
to lots 12-17 of CT 82-4/PIP 87-3, and prior to issuance of occupancy permits for buildings located on lots 12-17 of CT 82-4/PIP 87-3, the Planning Director or his' representative shall
conduct a f ield, investigation to assure the -landscaping on the
bu~tress slope areas (outlined in yellow on Exhibit "A", received 3/21/88,) has taken and , is in a thriving and healthy condition.'
3. The - landscape plan shal , 1 be amended as shown on Exhibit 11 B;1 received 3/21/88.
4i Pri,or. to the issuance of the grading permit, the applicant shall submit*a letter of credit-or certificate of -deposit made out to the City of Carlsbad from a financial institut~ion subject to regulation.by the state or federal government f or the,following amount and valid for the following term:
Amount -.$60;000
Term 4 years from the date of'grading,permit,,isi.-uance
At the' end of the term or if after two years and - the landscaping has taken hold, is healthy and thriving to the ~atisfaction'to both the Planning-Direc'tor and City Engineer,
MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued)
the applicant can submit aleitter requesting 4 letter from both the' Planning Director and the City Engineer quit claiming the
letter of credit or certificate of.deposit. If during~the t
e
r
m
of the 'letter of credit or certificate of -,deposit the ,landscaping is not to the ~atisfaction of the Planning Dir
e
c
t
o
r
and.'City Engineer,," the Planning Director and City Engineer shall 'have sole authority to -cash the letter of credit or cert-ific9t.e, of deposit .to , co'*rrec,t this unsatisfactory landscaping..
5. A. qualified :pa leo'ntoiogical'. monitor shall. be present at a pregrading, conference, -with- the-. developer, grading., cont'ractor, and the
environmental. review coordinator. The purpose of this meeting will be to consult and coordinate the
role of the paleontologist in the' grciding of the
s *te i
*
"A qualified paleontologist is an.individual
with, adequate knowledge 'and experience with
fossilized remains likely to be Present to identify
them in the field and is adequately experienced to
remove the resources for further study.
B.' A paleontologist.' or designate .4shall be present''." during those r6lative phases of. grading as determined :at the pregrading conference.*- The monitor. shall :have' the authority to temporarily' direct, divert or ,halt grading,to allow recovery.of.
fossil' remains ,- (primarily marine mammals). At .the discretion of the monitor,-- recove
'
ry may inclu
'
de. washing and picking of.- soil samples 'for microvertebrate
'
bo
'
ne and teeth. .. The developer, shall authorize the deposit of any resource'si.found on the pr~oject site in' an institution staffed
by qualified paleontologists as_may
'
'be determined by the Planning Director.' The contractor -shall be aware of the' random nature of fossil occurrences
and the possibility of -a discovery of remains -of '. such scientific-and/or educational importance which,
might warrant. a long term salvage operation 'or preservation. Any conflicts regarding the role of
the paleontologist and/or recovery times shall be ,resolved by the Pl.anning-D.irector.
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS.TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED-THE ABOVE.MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF T MEA RES TOI THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
LBS: af
Vi.
get
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989
Office of the City Engineer
C itp of Carlobab
TELEPHONE
(619) 438-5541
TO,~ BUIL[)111115
FROM:, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DATE:
ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL FOR PROJECT NO. 7,4-~
(TRACT or P.E.
(PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS)
L5 00 _1~a vW Y~, &42~Y-QSC~ APS1.4',
(DEVELOPER'S NAME AND ADDRESS) 6CA q Z
We have inspected the grading .'for, lots -7 or phase
of the above menti'O"'ned project. In-addition, we have received rough
the Soils grading certification.from 16~_44.cl el .-/14.
Engineer, dat~d m L -and fro 171e?~~k r-le y
the Supervi s i ng Gradi.n'g,- Engi n6er, dated and are.satis-
fied that the~'.rough gradin'g- -has" b'e'e'n completed in accordance -w-ith City
01 standards'.-" "s J
7" a P?d
Based . on these certi,fications 'and.our observation, we take no,exception to
the issuance of a building per:mit'for lots z or phase
of project, from a grading
standpoint. This release, however, is not intended to certify the project
from other engineeri,ng concerns including site development., water or sewer
availability, or f.inal grading.
Prior ,to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, we n.eed,to be advised
so that we can verify,that final 'grading and landscaping has been complet-
ed in accordance with the'approved plans for-the project.'
APPROVED:
--- /~O"M
7- Prodect Gracring Inspector /Sr.~/jnstruction/Insp:ector
cc: Developer