HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.87.47; LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT 4 LOT 726; Engineering Application0 D L?
Building Permit Plan Check No.
Application for Grading Permit
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1200 Elm Avenue
438-6644 11T,'~_Z)
PE NO. r_,,,A,~7 - 4
AP0,21-5- 4 1.- 07
vw)& #- g e 1-/ -1
Validation by Finance
Department
FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN
Site Address Surety Company vvv~ Vuf VA. VJ-V.L V.Lut)r).d~qjb. 4VVVAVV
2622 Argonauta, Carlsbad, CA ()2QO9 C 200-00
Legal Description Map No. I Surety Address
Subdivision Name Date Filed Rec'd by
La Costa Meadows unit No. 4 /_/ Owner . Phone Cash deposit R 'd b D t filed
(7h,qY4~i--r r.ny~n . .$ 'Z,-,,1_11e_> =,k 01 JAA~
ThEFfollowing documents are required and shall bbc6me a part
of the grading permit when they are approved.
ZGrading plans Specifications
Soil report Geologic Report
Drainage structures Other
Compaction report
Owner's Address
Plans by Civil Engineer R.C.E. -
Helming Engineering, Tn(,- 23874
—
Address Phone 967-4300 1919 Am)le St..Suite B. Oceanside- CA q:)nr)4
Soil EngineerC. Christian R.C.E22330 Phone 746-4544
Grading Contractor Fh_ -o-n e
c. 6IFr 41,11-1 sr'ss
Address
145 VkL1_ 94- ITOS ORO CAN H4kcd
Party responsible for overall supervision
John Millett 438-8226
Proposed use of grade site
Single Family Residence -
Number of cubic yards
Cut Fill Import Waste 4 It... ~ .
JUN 1988 445 21800 2,355 "M Mt.—
fY -3 BAD Proposed Schedule of Start Cl URNARSN-0
Operations (dates) CARLSBAo, CA
I hereby acknowledge that I have read the appl i cat
ic the information I have provided is correct and agree§~
all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading,
and the provisions and conditiony6fany permit iss rl a to
this application.
Signature of Permittee
Owner or authorized i ent
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE -
--.Y --I al Date
E I A'Log NO. 1!!!~
By
SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE
A PART OF THIS PERMIT
1 Authorized hours of operation:
7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday.
Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer.
Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation
control.
All slopes shall be planted per City Code.
All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum
density unless noted otherwise.
Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is:
E) REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections
~Oted below.
grICONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall
observe work, coordinate tests, make reports.
INSPECTION DATE -INSP. S)13NeURE
Initial - site prep. -010 -1818 T..
Rough - prior to drains fo~ay 60
Final - slopes plantedO ZQ25 lk2 , V1yV_ZrZr~_
-
0 49 Plan check fee $ so
Compaction reports rec'd. tv
Private engr. cert. rec'd.
Date ry Copies: White-Office; Green-Building;
Yellow-Inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod-Finance
6 k- -7
THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED
THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD
Grading permit fee $
Permi I u .0
by oo
Permit Expiraltoon ate
ENBINEERING
n075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161
Office of the City Engineer.
19A)
TRU of Tarlsbab A6WW,,r.,.51,0w
t TO: DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES. &Z A4e"S 'Ve Y' 'A) 7*t'&
FROM:' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
2- .1417&1 577e,,,4-o0 Ale, PIO&V
DATE:
;~7
ROU
,
GH GRADING APPROVAL FOR PROJECT NO. 11"7 — _—.5 774-13416
(TRACT -or P.E. #) IV7491IC7 s4el__149' 101:1-/? IC11164AI
(PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS)
6p,*afo" 0_~Vlk_q_s aS. Qld <A.-, 1 )09
(DEVELOPER'S NAME AND ADDRESS) 0, CA -
-We have inspected the grading for lots or phase
of the Above mentioned project. 'In add e have received-rough grading n
certification from ug_ the Soils Engineer,
JL % g~ dated —S~~s4.36, Yq 0 and from - e rA
the Supervision Grading*Engineer, dated and are satisfied
that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with City standards.
Based on these certifications and our observation, we take no exceptia6 to the
issuance of a building permit fdr,lots or phase of
proj6ct from a grading aa A A-, NJ standpoint. This release, however, is not 'intended to certify the project from ,
other engineering concerns including site. development, water or sewer'
availability, or final'grading.
Prior.to the issuance. of a certificate: of occupancy, we need.to be advised so
that 'we can verify that final grading and, landscaping has been 6om'pleted. in
accordance with the approved plans for the.project.'
APPROVED:
Project GradidVinspector Srgon'stru'ction 4spector
roject Engineer
c: Developer
-7
ENGINEERIN'6
FEE: $175.00
RECEIPT NO:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I
(To Be Complete'd -by APPLICANT)
CASE NO: C2
DATE:
Applicant: CHARTER -qF-M7TM C-'MPnRArTTTW
Address -of Applicant: g, ag No. ~g,4L, oTrrTR Pnp A RT sg a T) PA gppng
Phone Number: 619 08-8226
Name,,-,address and phone number of person-to be-contacted.(if other than
Appl icant) DOUG HEIPUNG1 HRTMrNG FNC1TMFFRTMr1. TMr 1@lg APPLF, S7RFFT, S1JTTR R
OCEANSIDE, CA 92054 (619)967-43bo GENERAL INFORMATION:
Description of Pro ject: CONSTRUCTION OF SINCIMF FAMTTY LOT WTTH MATFT) PAr)-
'Project Location/Address: STTg IS T iOCATED ON TUR MogrPH qTT)F. QR AgrnTSTATITA QITRFFrp
AT INTERSECTION WITHI~ OB1 CQ-~PCARQL~ (2622 AR oNmr2g sTRF.F.T) G
Assessor Parcel Number: 215 461) 07
Zone of Subject.' Property: R-1-15
Proposed Use of Site: SINGLE FAy1ILy MSTpENCF
List all other applicable applications related
GRADING MRMIT
to this.project:
-Z~ -Describe.the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man-
made characteristi6s; also pr~vide'.precise slope analysis when
appropriate.
LOT IS CURRENTLY VACANT-; THE TERRAIN - SLOPES AWAY FROM ARGONAUrA. THERE
IS AN-EXISTTNG RESIDENCE ON-LOT 725 TO THE WEST. I LOT 127 ON THE EAST -IS ALSO
V~dANT AT THIS TIME. SEWER IS IN AN EASEMENT ALONG THE NORTH S
.
IDE`OF THE PR
I
OPERTY.
WATER IS AVAILABLE IN ARGONAUTA ON THE SOU.M.
Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design
and/or operation.of the project.
RESIDENCE WILL HAVE APPROPRIATE ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES IN
ACCORDANCE'WITH LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES.
If re-sidential, include-the number of-unilts, schedule of un
I
it sizes',
range of sale prices or rents,.a'nd type of househ6ld size expected..
ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TOTALTNG -2..,254~ Sq. Feet; ESTIMATED
SALES PRICE $24,500.00
.5. If commercial, indicate the-type,, whether-neighborhood, city or
regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities.
N/A
6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and
loading facilities.
N/A'
7.. If in,stit.u*ti.onal, indicate th*e -major. function, estimated empl oyment per
shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and ccimmunity-benefits
to be derived from the project.
N/A
-2-
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate
space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as
necessary.)
YES NO
1) Could the project significan'tly.ch.ang.e pr . esent
land uses in the vicin.ity of the activity? X
2. Could the activity affect the use of a recreational
area, or area of important aesthetic value? X
3). Could the activity affect the functioning of.an-
established community or neighborhood? X
Could the activity result in the displacement of
community residents? X
Could the activity increase the.number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city? X
6.) Could the activity decrease the number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city7 X
Are any of the natural or man-made features in the
activity area, unique, that is, not found in other
.parts,of the county, state or'nation? X
Could the activity significantly affect an
historical or archaeological site or its settings? X,
Could the activity significantl.y'affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource? X
Does the activity significantly affect the
potential use, ;extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
11*)' Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life?
12) Are ther
'
e any rare or endangered plant species
in the activity area? X
13), Could the ac
'
tivity-change existing features of
any of.the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands?
Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches? X
'Could the activity result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands?
Could the activity serve to encourage development
of presently..undeveloped areas or intensify develop-
ment of ,already developed areas?
-3-
YES NO
17) Will the activity require a variance from
established 'environmental, standards (ait, water,
noise, etc.),? x
18),'Will the activity requi re. certification, authoriza-
tion or issuance of'a permit by any local, state .or. federal -environmental control agency? x
'Will the activity require issuance-of a variance
or conditibnal use permit by the City? x
Will the activity'involv'e the application, use,. or. disposal of-potentially hazardou.s materials? x
'Will the activity'involv
.
e.construction'of
facilities in a flood plain? x
Will the activity -involve construction of
facilities in the area of an' act.iv'e,fault?
Will the 'Activity involve construction,of
facilities on-a slope of 25 percent or greater?
Could the activity result in the,generation of
significant-amounts of~noise? x
Cbuld-the activity result in the.generation of
significaht amounts of dust?,- x
Will the activity inv6lve-the burning of bru.sh,
-trees, or'other materials?
271 ), Could the activity result in-a si.gnificant change
in the qua.lity of-any portion of the region's'air
or water.resources? ~Should note surface, ground
water, off"shore.). x
~128) Will'the project
-
substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? x
29) Will there be a significant change 'to existing
land-. form?
'Indi
'
cate estimated grading to be done in
cub,ic yards: 2 000
Percentage of alteration to the presdnt-
land
'
form: 60%
.(c)' Maximum,height of 3HA_-.ar fiffslopes:
27 .~aet
30) Will, the activity result in substantial increases
in'the use of Utilities, sewers, drains or streets?
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger
project or series of projects?
STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions *in Section I but yo.0 think-the activity will have no significant environmental.
effectsi indicate your reasons below:
III.- COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION-I
(If additional -space is needed for answering any questions, attach
additional -sheets as needed.).
Signature_41/4~0
i
~l (Pers6n Compl g Report)
'7 Date Signed—
ENOINEENING
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM PART'II
(TO BECOMPLETED BY THE PLANNING' DEPA:P.TMENT)
CASE'NO -07. L~7-
DATE,- I _z Z
BACKOROUND
1. ''APPLICANT:—. Sev y/ C (f '(;rp
2 ADDR ESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT:
3 DATE,.'CHECK LIST SUBMITTED:
Ii. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(-Expl'anations',,,of all .Affirmativel Answers are~to be written under
Section III Discussion.of Environmental Eval'uation)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth 7 Will the proposal,have
sig.nif,icant results' in:,
Unstable earth conditions -or in'
.,changes in-geologi,c substructures?
Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or oVercovering of the soi
in t'pogr.aphy or ground Change 0
.,surface relief. features')
-The destruction., covering or
modification of any.-unique geologic
or physical .featur6s?
Any increase in wind or water -
erosion of soils, either on or off
the s e.
f Changes in deposition or .erosion
of beach sands, or.changes in
siltd.tion, depositioni.or erosion
which may 'modify ~he channel.or a
river. or stream or,the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES MAYBE NO.
2., Air Will the proposal have
significant'results in:,-
a., Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air'quality?
The, creation of.objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement f
moistur.e *or temperature, or any
change-,in.climate, either locally
or.regionally?
3. Water Will, the proposal have'
significant results in:
a-. Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh.,w'aters?
Changes in absorption-rates,'
drainage patterns*, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff?
C. Alte.rat,ions.to the course or flow
of f lood, waters.?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body>.
Discharge:into surface Naters,
or in any alteration of surf ace
water quality, inoluding,but not
limited to, temperature,.dissolv,ed
oxygen or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or
rate of'flow of ground waters?
Change in the quantity of ground
waters,, either through dire~ct ,
additions or withdrawals,, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts'
or excavations?
'Reduction in the:amount of water
otherwise available f or, public*
water supplies?
'2-
if
YES MAYBE, No
Plant Life Will the proposal have
significant results i 6:
a., Change in -the diversity of species,
~or numbers,,of any species,of plants,,
(..including trees,. shrubs,, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?-
b.. ..Red uc.t ion of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of -plants?
C. Introduction of new species of plants.
into,an area, or in a barrierto the.
normal-replenishment of existing,
species?
d. Reduction in acrea'ge'of any
agricultural crop?
'Animal Life.- Will the' proposal have
significant,,results in:
a Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers, of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish.and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects' or m.icrofauna)?
b'. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?'
c. Introduction of new,species of 'animals
into an,
-
area, ot' result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of
animals?
d Deterioration to eic.i'sting fish or~
wildlife habitat?,
6-. No i-s e, Will the proposal significantly
increase existing noise levels?
T. L'i.ght'and Glare will the .proposal',sig-
produce new light,or glare?
8'.. Land Use Will the proposal have
significant results in-the alteration of
the pres6nt or planned land.use bf ,an
area?
-3-
~ . MAYBE . NO YES
9.* Natural Resources Will the proposal
have significant results in:
Increase in the.rate of use of any
natural resources?
Depletion of any -nonrenew'ab,le
natural resource?
10.. Risk of Upset Does the proposal
involve a si—gnificant risk of,-an.
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not-limited
to, oil, pesticides,-chemicals or'
~radiation) in the event of an-accident
or upset conditions?
Population Will the proposal -signif-
icantly alter the location; distribu-
tio'n',,density, or growth rate of .the
human population of an area?..
Housing Will the proposal signif-
icantly affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional -housing?
Transportation/CircUlation --Will the
proposal have significant results in:
Generation of ,additional vehicular -
movement?.
Effects on existing parking facilit-
ies, or'demand for new parking?
Impact upon existing transporation
s I ystems?
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or ,fffovement of people
and/or goods?
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
Increase in.traffic hazards to.
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
'pedestrians?
'1~
-4-
IS
YES MAYBE NO
141.' Public Services Will the proposal have
a signi—ficant effect upon, or have signif-
icant results in the need for new or
altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a~. Fire protection?
-b..-Police.,protection?
c. Schools?
A. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
MAi.ntenance of public facilities,
including roads?
Other governmental.services?
'Energy Will the proposal have signi-f-
Jcant results in:
~a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
b.- Demand, upon existing sources of
energy,, or require the development
of new sources of'energy?
Utilities - Will the proposal have
significant results in the need for new.
systems., or alterations to the following
utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b.~ Communications systems?
c., Water?.
A. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?,
Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health - Will the proposal -have
significant results in the creation of
any-health hazard or potential health
hazard (excluding mental health)?
—5-
YES MAYBE NO
Aesthetics Will the,proposal have
significant results in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or vi-ew open to the
public, or will the proposal result in
creation of an aesthetically offensive
public view?
Recreation Will the.proposal have
significant results in'the impact upon
-the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
Archeological/H'istorical - Will the
proposal have signiFi-cant results in
the.alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site,,
structure, object or building?
Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as:
a),Phased, development of the project,.b) alternate sitedesigns,
c.),alternate scale of development, d) alt'e'rnate uses for the 'site,
e) development at some future time, rather than now, f) alternate
sites for the proposed, and- g) no project alternative.
YES MAYBE NO
22. Mandatory Findings of Significance
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, or curtail the diversity
in the environment?
Does the project have the potential
to-achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term,, environmental
goal's? (A short-term impact*on,the
environment is one which occurs in'a
~relatively brief, definitive period of
time ,while long-term impact*s will
endure -well into the future.)
C., Does the project have impact.s 1which
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A
project may impact on two or more
separate re.sou'rces where the impact
on each resource is relatively small,
but where the effect.'of the total'of
those impacts on the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly.?
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
li
e
C_ CLJ'7
red 27 a'~Iff 'ic U111f, 7 4du~~?'f d civ4d //,/^ 1 17 1~
L441)1-J -44
a/
-7-
if
,.IV..,- DETERMINATION (To Be Completed by the'Land Use.,P.1arining,,Office)
on the basis of this initial evaluation-.*
I find the ,proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the enVironment.,,and a.NEGATIVIE.DECLTRATION will be ,prepared'*.
I find that although. the proposed-project coul d have a significant
effect on the environment, there will no
'
t be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures de.scribed on.an attac hed
sheet have been added to the project— A Conditional Negative.
De'claration will be- proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on -the environment, and.an ENVIRONMENTAL, IMPACT REPORT is required.
'Signature at 94
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
-9-