HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.87.51; LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT 4 LOT 692; Engineering Applicationfl
gel 1.4
Bui ding Permit Plan Check No. —
Application for Grading Permit
. 0 CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1200 Elm Avenue
438-954-t
PE.NOTELPO'SL
A 1,W -44
Validation by Finance
Department
Soil Engineer R.C.E. Phone
Grading Contractor Phone
Address
Party responsible for overall supervision.
Proposed use of grade'site
Number of cubic yards
Cut Fill Import Waste
2&4-0 1* 2,0~0 1 1
Proposed Schedule of Start Firvish
Operations (dates)
I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that
the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with
I
Surety Company Bond No.
Surety Address
Date Filed Rec'd by
Cash deposit Rec'd by Date filed
$
The following documents are required and shall become a part
of the grading permit when they are approved.
Grading plans Specifications
Soil report Geologic Report
Drainage structures Other
Compaction report
SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE
A PART OF THIS PERMIT
__J,._._AuthQdzed_.hoLWL0.f CiDeration:
7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday.
2. Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer.
Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation
control.
I slopes shall be planted per City Code.
5. Ail fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum
density unless noted otherwise.
FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN
Site Address 0 13 FL,1 S, C 0 (3,
,,,,
Legal De§ffription/
,
, M No t4f=- Ir,
Subdi4on Name
Tw- Xe r, &2 ~2
Phone —5
Owner's Add s Al, *f AL/WJ C- ! _r .16" vwe
Plans by Civil Engineer/ R.C.E.
Address Phone
all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is:
and the provisions and conditions f any permit issued pursuan o 0 REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections
this application. listed below.
0 CONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall
Signature of Permittee A observe work, coordinate tests,. make reports.
INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE
Owner or authorized agent
Initial - site prep.
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE -
EIA Log No
Grading permit fee $
Permit Issued
h%1
Permit Expiration Date
Date Rough - prior to drains
Final - slopes planted
By
Plan check fee $ Compaction reports rec'd.
Private engr. cert. rec'd.
Date Copies: White-Office; Green-Building;
Yellow-inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod- F i nance
THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED
THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD
6- ENIINEERING
FE 9 $175. 00
a -7 AW-r—Lel -Nu:
'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM--'-Part I
(To Be Completed by.APPLICANT)
CASE.NO: e-7 _sv
DAT i!' 1/- 4 V-7.1
~A L F~: L A Applicarit
Address .of Applicant: 17,4a6- 5 C
N tn A*-Ak k,
72
Phone Number: gq
Name,*address And phone number-of person%to be contacted (if other'than'
Applicant):,-,
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Description,~of Project:
Project Locat ion/Address:, LO -T- q -2, C,6'S_r;1+ FI) a w
C -C-L45 C-I Q
Assessor Parcel Number:
Zone, of.. Subject'Property:
Proposed Use of S i t e:
List all othez applicable applications related to this.project.
-Describe the activity-area r including (listiguishing.natura'l and man-
made.,char,acteristics;,also proyide,precise slope analysis when
appropriate.
Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design
and/or ,operation of the.project.
CLA
If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes,
range of-sale prices or rents, and -type,of household size expected.
If'commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or
regionallyoriented, square.foo'tage of sales area,,And loading
facilities.
If industrial,, indicate type,' estimated employment per shift,, and
loading facilities.
If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per
shift, estimated occupancy,-loading'-facilities, and community benefits
to.be derived 'from the project,.
W
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate
space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as
necessary..)
YES NO
Could the project significantly. change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activity?
Could the activity affect the use of a recreational
area, or area of important aesthetic value?
Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood?
Could the activity result in the displacement of
community residents?
Could the activity increase the number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city?
Could the activity decrease the number of low and .
modest c.ost housing units in the city?
Are any of the natural or man-made features in the
activity area unique, that is, not found .in other
parts of the county, state or nation?
Could the activity significantly affect an
historical or archaeological site or its settings?
Could the activity significantly affect th e V/ potential use, extraction, or conservation of. a
scarce natural resource?
Does the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life?
V/ Are there..any rare or endangered p-1-ant species
in the activity area?
Could the activity change existing features of V/ any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands?
vx" Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches?
Could the activity result in the
'
erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands?
Could the activity serve to encourage development
of presently undeveloped areas orintensify develop-
ment of already developed areas?
-3-
YES NO
17). will the~activity require a variance from
established',environmental-standards (air, water,
noise, etc,.)?'.
Will- the activity require certification, authoriza-
tion or issuance of a permit by any -local, state or
federal environmental control A~gency?
Will the activity require issuance of a variance
or conditional use permit.by the-City?
'Will the activity invol ve the application, use, or
disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain?
Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault?
Will the activity.involve construc tion of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
Could.the activity result in the generation of
'amounts significant of noise?
Could the activ ity result in the generation of
' significant amounts of dust?
Will -the activity involve the burning of brush,,'
trees, or other materials?
Could the activity result in a significant change
in the quality of Any -portion of the region's air
or water resources? (Should note'surface, ground
water, off-shore.)
.28) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)?
29) Will there.be a significant change to existing
1 and form?
Indicate estimated grading to be done in
cubic yards:
Percentage of altezationoto the.present
land form: _VvtAA~A~~
Maximum hei4-htof cut or fill slopes:
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets?
31) Is the activity. carried out as part of a larger
,proj'ect or'series.of projects?
-4-
STATEMENT OF-NON-SI~GUIFICANT tNViRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you ha4e answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section
I but you think the activi'ty will have no significant envir.0nmental
effectsu ind.icate' your reasons below:
COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SE,CTI'ON I-
(If additional space is needed for-answering any'question's, attach
additional she as needed.)
Signature
erson. Co pleting Report)
Date Signed
ENGINEERING
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM PART Il
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)'
CASE NO. P.E. 2.87.51
DATE: September 14, 1989
BACKGROUND
1. ~APPLICANT: Mr. & Mrs. Lowell Abeles
2— ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: (305)891-1229
12555 Biscayne Blvd.
No. Miami, FL 33181
3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: November 10, 1987
Ii. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written
.under Section III Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth Will the proposal.
have significant results in:
Unstable earth conditions
or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
*Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering
of the soil? X
Change in topography or ground
surface relief features? X
The destruction, covering of
modification of any unique
physical features? X
Any increase in wind or water
erosion of-soils,, either on or
off the site? X
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel or a,
river or stream or the bed,of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
YES MAYBE NO
2. Air Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a,. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? X
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?- X
c Alteration of air movement,_
moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally? X
~3. Water - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in eithermarine or fresh waters?, X
Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patters, or the rate and
"amount l of surface water runoff? X
I .,c. Alterations to the course or'flow
of flood waters? X
Change in the amount of surface
-water in any water body? X
Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to, temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? X
Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters? X
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through'
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations? X
Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies? :X
-2-
I CW J
YES MAYBE NO
4. Plant Life Will the proposal
have significant results in:
Change in the,diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass"
crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of1 plants? X
Introduction of new species of plants
into an area, or'in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species? X
Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop? X
5'. Animal Life Will the proposal have
significant,results in:
a. Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)? X
Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? X
Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or1 result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of
animals? X
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat? X
6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly
increase existing noise levels? X
Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig-
nificantly produce new light or,glare? X
8. -_Land Use Will the proposalhave
significant results in the alteration of
the present or planned land use of an
area? X
-3-
YES MAYBE NO
9. Natural Resources Will the proposal
have significant results in:
Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources? X
Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource? X
10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including" but,not'limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident
or upset conditions? X
117., PoT)ulation Will the proposal' signif-
icantly alter the location, distribu-
density,-or growth rate of the
human population of an area? X,
12. Housing - Will the proposal signif *
icantly affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? X
13, Transportation/Circulation Will the
-proposal have significant results,in:
Generation of additional vehicular
movement? X
Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand fornew parking? X
Impact upon existing transportation
systems? X
4.1 Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of.people
and/or goods? X
-Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic? X
f. Increase in traffic hazards to
-motor vehicles, bicyclists or-
pedestrians? X
-4-
YES MAYBE NO
14. Public Services Will the.proposal have
a significant effect upon, or have signif-
icant results in the need for new or
altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
Fire protection? X
Police protection? X
C. Schools? X
Parks or other recreational
facilities? X
Maintenance of public facilities,
including,roads? X
other governmental services? X
15. Energy - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Use of.substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? X
b., Demand upon existing sources of
energy,-or require the development
of new sources of energy? X
16. Utilities - Will the proposal have
significant results in the need for new
systems, or alterations to the following
utilities:
Power or natural gas? X
Communications systems? X
Water? X
Seweror septic tanks? X
Storm water drainage> X
waste and disposal? X
17. Human Health - Will the proposal have
significant results in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health
hazard (excluding mental health)?
-5-
YES MAYBE NO
Aesthetics Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal-result in
creation of an aesthetically offensive
public view?
Recreation - Will the proposal have
significant results in the impact upon
the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? x
Archeological/Historical/Paleontoloctical
Will the proposal have significant
results in the alteration of a significant
archeological, paleontological or
historical site, structure, object or
building?
Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed Project such as:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter-
nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
Phasing is not pertinent to single family projects.
Proposed site design is adequate.
Proposed scale of development is compatible with adjacent uses land
consistent with applicable regulations.
~d) Proposed use is allowed for site.
e) Development at this time is appropriate
NA'.
g) The project alternativiawould leave the site vacant. Development at
this time is permitted and appropriate.
-6-
YES
.22. Mandatory findings of significance
Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the-environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of-a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A~ short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive -period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
P. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
-with the effects of past projects, the
effects of othei current projects, and
I theeffects of probable future projects.)
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
F-1
MAYBE NO
.III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION'.
tarth - The proposed project.will not affect the geologic stability of the
site or adversely impact the existing topography or soil conditions. The
site is a pre-graded lot and the proposed grading is reasonable given the
existing pad for a single family residence.
Water - The project will not impact any physical properties-of any water
resources.,
-7-
0 ~
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
Plant and Animal Life - The proposed residence is for a - pre graded lot in
an existing residential neighborhood. Impacts to plant or animal life will
be minimal.
Noise/Light and Glare - NA.
Land Use - The proposed single family residence is allowed by the Zoning
ordinance and consistent with the General Plan. No adverse impacts to land
use-will result from this project.
Natural. Resources, Risk of Upset, Population, Housing, Public Services,
Fnergy. Utilities, Human Health, Aesthetics, Recreation - The single family
residence, as proposed, will not adversely impact any of the environmental
issues listed above.
Archeological /Historical - The subject site is not located on any type of
archeological or historical resource.
In conclusion, the proposed single family residence will be constructed on
an existed pre graded pad involving a reasonable amount of grading - roughly
-1,040 cubic yards of cut and 3,370 cubic yards of fill on the .87 acre site
in an existing residential area. Staff will prepare a Negative Declaration.
Rev. 12/88
IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The,Planning Department)
On the basis'of this initial evaluation:
X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
-I find that although the,proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this casel because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have . a significant'effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Signature
,Planning Director