Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.87.51; LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT 4 LOT 692; Engineering Applicationfl gel 1.4 Bui ding Permit Plan Check No. — Application for Grading Permit . 0 CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1200 Elm Avenue 438-954-t PE.NOTELPO'SL A 1,W -44 Validation by Finance Department Soil Engineer R.C.E. Phone Grading Contractor Phone Address Party responsible for overall supervision. Proposed use of grade'site Number of cubic yards Cut Fill Import Waste 2&4-0 1* 2,0~0 1 1 Proposed Schedule of Start Firvish Operations (dates) I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with I Surety Company Bond No. Surety Address Date Filed Rec'd by Cash deposit Rec'd by Date filed $ The following documents are required and shall become a part of the grading permit when they are approved. Grading plans Specifications Soil report Geologic Report Drainage structures Other Compaction report SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE A PART OF THIS PERMIT __J,._._AuthQdzed_.hoLWL0.f CiDeration: 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday. 2. Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation control. I slopes shall be planted per City Code. 5. Ail fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum density unless noted otherwise. FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN Site Address 0 13 FL,1 S, C 0 (3, ,,,, Legal De§ffription/ , , M No t4f=- Ir, Subdi4on Name Tw- Xe r, &2 ~2 Phone —5 Owner's Add s Al, *f AL/WJ C- ! _r .16" vwe Plans by Civil Engineer/ R.C.E. Address Phone all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: and the provisions and conditions f any permit issued pursuan o 0 REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections this application. listed below. 0 CONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall Signature of Permittee A observe work, coordinate tests,. make reports. INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE Owner or authorized agent Initial - site prep. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - EIA Log No Grading permit fee $ Permit Issued h%1 Permit Expiration Date Date Rough - prior to drains Final - slopes planted By Plan check fee $ Compaction reports rec'd. Private engr. cert. rec'd. Date Copies: White-Office; Green-Building; Yellow-inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod- F i nance THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD 6- ENIINEERING FE 9 $175. 00 a -7 AW-r—Lel -Nu: 'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM--'-Part I (To Be Completed by.APPLICANT) CASE.NO: e-7 _sv DAT i!' 1/- 4 V-7.1 ~A L F~: L A Applicarit Address .of Applicant: 17,4a6- 5 C N tn A*-Ak k, 72 Phone Number: gq Name,*address And phone number-of person%to be contacted (if other'than' Applicant):,-, GENERAL INFORMATION: Description,~of Project: Project Locat ion/Address:, LO -T- q -2, C,6'S_r;1+ FI) a w C -C-L45 C-I Q Assessor Parcel Number: Zone, of.. Subject'Property: Proposed Use of S i t e: List all othez applicable applications related to this.project. -Describe the activity-area r including (listiguishing.natura'l and man- made.,char,acteristics;,also proyide,precise slope analysis when appropriate. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or ,operation of the.project. CLA If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of-sale prices or rents, and -type,of household size expected. If'commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionallyoriented, square.foo'tage of sales area,,And loading facilities. If industrial,, indicate type,' estimated employment per shift,, and loading facilities. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,-loading'-facilities, and community benefits to.be derived 'from the project,. W I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessary..) YES NO Could the project significantly. change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? Could the activity decrease the number of low and . modest c.ost housing units in the city? Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found .in other parts of the county, state or nation? Could the activity significantly affect an historical or archaeological site or its settings? Could the activity significantly affect th e V/ potential use, extraction, or conservation of. a scarce natural resource? Does the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? V/ Are there..any rare or endangered p-1-ant species in the activity area? Could the activity change existing features of V/ any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? vx" Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? Could the activity result in the ' erosion or elimination of agricultural lands? Could the activity serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas orintensify develop- ment of already developed areas? -3- YES NO 17). will the~activity require a variance from established',environmental-standards (air, water, noise, etc,.)?'. Will- the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any -local, state or federal environmental control A~gency? Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit.by the-City? 'Will the activity invol ve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? Will the activity.involve construc tion of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? Could.the activity result in the generation of 'amounts significant of noise? Could the activ ity result in the generation of ' significant amounts of dust? Will -the activity involve the burning of brush,,' trees, or other materials? Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of Any -portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note'surface, ground water, off-shore.) .28) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Will there.be a significant change to existing 1 and form? Indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards: Percentage of altezationoto the.present land form: _VvtAA~A~~ Maximum hei4-htof cut or fill slopes: 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? 31) Is the activity. carried out as part of a larger ,proj'ect or'series.of projects? -4- STATEMENT OF-NON-SI~GUIFICANT tNViRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you ha4e answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activi'ty will have no significant envir.0nmental effectsu ind.icate' your reasons below: COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SE,CTI'ON I- (If additional space is needed for-answering any'question's, attach additional she as needed.) Signature erson. Co pleting Report) Date Signed ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM PART Il (TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)' CASE NO. P.E. 2.87.51 DATE: September 14, 1989 BACKGROUND 1. ~APPLICANT: Mr. & Mrs. Lowell Abeles 2— ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: (305)891-1229 12555 Biscayne Blvd. No. Miami, FL 33181 3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: November 10, 1987 Ii. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written .under Section III Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth Will the proposal. have significant results in: Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X *Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X The destruction, covering of modification of any unique physical features? X Any increase in wind or water erosion of-soils,, either on or off the site? X Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a, river or stream or the bed,of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES MAYBE NO 2. Air Will the proposal have significant results in: a,. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors?- X c Alteration of air movement,_ moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X ~3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in eithermarine or fresh waters?, X Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and "amount l of surface water runoff? X I .,c. Alterations to the course or'flow of flood waters? X Change in the amount of surface -water in any water body? X Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through' interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? :X -2- I CW J YES MAYBE NO 4. Plant Life Will the proposal have significant results in: Change in the,diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass" crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of1 plants? X Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or'in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X 5'. Animal Life Will the proposal have significant,results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? X Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or1 result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? X Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or,glare? X 8. -_Land Use Will the proposalhave significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X -3- YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources Will the proposal have significant results in: Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X 10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including" but,not'limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 117., PoT)ulation Will the proposal' signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- density,-or growth rate of the human population of an area? X, 12. Housing - Will the proposal signif * icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13, Transportation/Circulation Will the -proposal have significant results,in: Generation of additional vehicular movement? X Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand fornew parking? X Impact upon existing transportation systems? X 4.1 Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of.people and/or goods? X -Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to -motor vehicles, bicyclists or- pedestrians? X -4- YES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services Will the.proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? X Police protection? X C. Schools? X Parks or other recreational facilities? X Maintenance of public facilities, including,roads? X other governmental services? X 15. Energy - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of.substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b., Demand upon existing sources of energy,-or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: Power or natural gas? X Communications systems? X Water? X Seweror septic tanks? X Storm water drainage> X waste and disposal? X 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? -5- YES MAYBE NO Aesthetics Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal-result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x Archeological/Historical/Paleontoloctical Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or building? Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed Project such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. Phasing is not pertinent to single family projects. Proposed site design is adequate. Proposed scale of development is compatible with adjacent uses land consistent with applicable regulations. ~d) Proposed use is allowed for site. e) Development at this time is appropriate NA'. g) The project alternativiawould leave the site vacant. Development at this time is permitted and appropriate. -6- YES .22. Mandatory findings of significance Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the-environment, substantially reduce the habitat of-a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A~ short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive -period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) P. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection -with the effects of past projects, the effects of othei current projects, and I theeffects of probable future projects.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? F-1 MAYBE NO .III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION'. tarth - The proposed project.will not affect the geologic stability of the site or adversely impact the existing topography or soil conditions. The site is a pre-graded lot and the proposed grading is reasonable given the existing pad for a single family residence. Water - The project will not impact any physical properties-of any water resources., -7- 0 ~ DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) Plant and Animal Life - The proposed residence is for a - pre graded lot in an existing residential neighborhood. Impacts to plant or animal life will be minimal. Noise/Light and Glare - NA. Land Use - The proposed single family residence is allowed by the Zoning ordinance and consistent with the General Plan. No adverse impacts to land use-will result from this project. Natural. Resources, Risk of Upset, Population, Housing, Public Services, Fnergy. Utilities, Human Health, Aesthetics, Recreation - The single family residence, as proposed, will not adversely impact any of the environmental issues listed above. Archeological /Historical - The subject site is not located on any type of archeological or historical resource. In conclusion, the proposed single family residence will be constructed on an existed pre graded pad involving a reasonable amount of grading - roughly -1,040 cubic yards of cut and 3,370 cubic yards of fill on the .87 acre site in an existing residential area. Staff will prepare a Negative Declaration. Rev. 12/88 IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The,Planning Department) On the basis'of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. -I find that although the,proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this casel because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have . a significant'effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Signature ,Planning Director