HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.88.05; LEMOND RESIDENCE; Engineering ApplicationApplication for Grading Permit PE NO2AS-"S
00 It-1-0 -7
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1200 Elm Avenue
438 SSS-D Validation by Finance
Department
Building Permit Plan Check No. 0014 06/10 0101 01AC4.880 I CXj. 00
FOR APPLICANT TO IF1 LLIN 004 4 06410 0101 Ga-miqr-
Site Address Surety'Company
I Bona-
BAKCAL- A 1400 66#Wo&w or.
Legal Description Map No.
V.?NxZCAt_
Surety; Address
Subdivision Name Date Fil Rec'd by
Owner Phone Cash deposit Rec'd by Date filed
HAS~l L-46#KOPt 4-3b $ ! 'no Z;>
Owner's Address The following documents are required and shall become a part
47b D&L-AAf- at, c,4 17-o74 of the grading. permit when they a7roved.
Plans by'Civil Engineer R.C.E.
-Q-VW C-otjv/411 Grading plans Specif ications
__V'Soil report Geotogic Report
V Drainage Other , structures Address Phone
1-55- "04"VOL, bA~j r4rtwlt4c Compaction report Soil Engineer . R.C.E. Phone
PrAl"OL-6k 3!6037 ;Z1j0 At73 7~ I
Grading Contractor Phone SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE
5_r&V&_ 6t9ACV_& qAz- _3q A PART OF THIS PERMIT
Address
T-0 VOY- 18Vq 01~;VA, CA 1 . Authorized hours of operation:
7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday.
Party responsible for overall supervision
Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. 'r.c_ ci,%IBW-f 0mice.,-(
Proposed use of grade site
COV6VOLL-10-wo or- o . F. Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation
control. Numberof cubic yards
Cut Fill Import Wast All slopes shall be planted per City Code.
4,G-0 I 10-7 I A",
Proposed Schedule of Start inifto ~i 6 )
All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum
Operations (dates) / IR-8 im density unless noted otherwise.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read the applicati d state that
W
the information I have provided is correaand agree t ly with
Nn all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavati g a
,and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to
this application,
Signature of Permittee
Owner or authorized agent
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE -
Date
E I A'Log No. FE p .05. '\ -
By UAj=6=A;k- Do IZO A-
Grading permit fee $ 61P — Plan check fee $ '16,00
Permi ssu
by Date
Permit ~) iration Date
d
THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED
THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MbNTH.PERIOD
Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is:
2 REGULAR GRADING, - City inspector will make inspections
listed below.
El CONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall
observe work, coordinate tests, make reports.
INSPECTION D~TE INSP. -SIGNATUQV)
Initial - site prep.
Rough - prior to drains
Final - slopes planted -A
Compaction reports.rec'd.
Private engr. cert. red'd.
Copies' White-Office; Green-Building;
Yellow-Inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod- Finance
FEE: $175.00
RECEIPT NO:
ENVIRONM'ENTA-L.IMPACT AS'SESSMENT FORM - Part I
(To Be Completed by APPLI.CANT)
CASE NO:
DATE: Uzuob
Appl i cant MV, L--S- M 10 fib
Address of Applicant: 4-7~ D6LA"
q7-O-Z+
Phone Number:. ( 6tq ) 4~;6-63-4S-
Name, addres:s and phone number of per,son 'to be contacted (if other than
F-31 - lt240
Applicant)i 6q6o 5AiL)bc,+ST1-fi t>R,, cAij~ws&Ab,e-14. qzooq
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Description of Project.: :3000 SQ, P=I-. C.1,k) &, Lj< I L-,f , 1/-/k
VaAI-46 C006"~-Pwcr 1W.
Project Location/Address: ~'M JAA00 <CAVICK-~ WY-
Assessor Parcel Number: `0 70 -
Zone of Subject Property: L-tk
Proposed Use of Site: *> 1600to ox-
4
J
i
List all other applicable applications related to this project:
J
0 9
Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man-
made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when
appropriate. I 5_L_OPC 'T - LO ~AA_
'Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design
and/or operation of the project.
P~O~Z_ JA1PJMV#-\ spce(~,X I-OSSM&S ilk) '(~fs T>66141U.
-If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes,
range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected.
~L S F~ b -
If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or
regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities.
If indu~strlal, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and
loading facilities.
O/A
If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per
shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits
to be derived,from the project.
O/A
-2-
I - - 0 0
9. . I . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate
space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as
necessary.)
YES NO
Could the project significantly change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activit-y? )4
Could the activity affect the use of a recreational
area, or area of important aesthetic value?
Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood?
Could the activity result in the displacement of
community residents! Y-
Could the activity increase the number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city?
Could the activity decrease the number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city?
Are any of the natur,al or man-made featu res in,the
activity area unique, that is, not found in other
parts of the county, state or nation?
Could the activity signi,ficantly affect an
historical or archaeological site or its settings?
Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
Does the activity signifi
'
cantly affect :the
potential usei extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
C'ould the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life?
Are there any rare or endangered plant species
in the activity area?
Could the activity change existing feat,ures of
any of the city's lagoons# bays, or tidelands?'
Could,the activity change existing features of
any of the city"s beaches? X
Could the activity result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands? —)<
Could the activity serve to encourage development
of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop-
ment of already developed areas? X
-3-
YES NO
17). Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water,
noise, etc.)?
Will the activity require certification, authoriza-
tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or
federal environmental control agency?
Will the activity require issuance of a variance
or conditional use permit by the, City?
Will the activity involve the,application, use, or
disposal of .potenti,ally hazardous materials?
Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain?
Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault?
Will the activity involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of noise?
Could the activity result in,the~generation of
significant amounts of dust? Y,
Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials? X
Could the activity result i
-
n a significant change
in the quality ot any portion of the region's air,
or water resources? (Should note surface, ground
water, off-shore.)
28) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)?
29) will there be a significant change to existing
land form?
Indicate estimated grading to,be done in
cubic yards: _-Ks Percentage of alteration to the present ,on land form: 0%-/
Maximum height of cut or fill slopes:
7 F1-- 0
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or street,s?
31) Is the activity carried out aspart of a larger
project or series of projects?
-4-
STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section
I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental
effects, indicate your reasons below:
A"b I P~ I k1tilHAL. OPL~~< 0 PC-
'35-0 Cv. YD-s- 1C. FIROTC)'51-Cb .
0 P) -'\ Lo v.) is &A-Svo-Ai- '~VzAsst'5 -to
COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach
additional sheets as needed.)
s.igna'ture
erson CoU(pdetiGq-jWp—O-rt
Date Signed
-5-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE N04 PE 2.88.05
DATE,: May 26, 1988
I. BACKGROUND
APPLICANT: . Mark Lemond
ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 476 Delage Court,
Encinitas, California 92024, (619) 436-6545
DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: May 26, 1988
Ii. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written
under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAYBE NQ
1. Earth - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
Unstable earth conditions
or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering
of thesoil? X
Change in topography or ground
surface relief features? X
The destruction, covering of
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features? X
Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soills, either on or
off the site? X
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, orchanges in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel or a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
0 0
YES MAYBE NO
2. Air - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? X
The creation of objectionable
odors? X
Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature., or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally? X
3. Water - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters? X
Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patters, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff? X
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters? X
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body? X
Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to, temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? X
Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters? X
Change in the quantity of ground
waters., either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquiferby cuts
or excavations? X
Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies? X
-2-
YES MAYBE NO
4. Plant Life - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any.species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants? X
Introduction of new species of plants
into an area, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species? X
Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop? X
5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)? X
Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? X
Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result 'in a barrier
to the migration or movement of
animals? X
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly
increase existing noise levels? X
7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig-
nificantly produce new light or glare? X
8. Land Use - Will the proposal have
significant results in the alteration of
the present or planned land use of an
area? X
-3-
0 0
YES MAYBE NO
9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources? X
Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource? X
10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident
or upset conditions? X
11. Population - Will the proposal signif-
icantly alter the location, distribu-
tion, density, or growth rate of the
human population of an area? X
12. Housing - Will the proposal signif-
icantly affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? X
13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the
proposal have significant results in:
Generation of additional vehicular
movement? X
Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking? X
c., Impact upon existing transportation
.systems? X
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? X
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic? X
Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? X
-4-
0 0
YES MAYBE NO
14. Public Services - Will the proposal have
a significant effect upon, or have signif-
icant results in the need for new or
,altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
Fire protection? X
Police protection? X
Schools? X
Parks or other recreational
facilities? X
Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? X
Other governmental services? X
15. Energy - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? X
Demand upon existing sources of
energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy? X
16. Utilities - Will the proposal have
significant results in the need for new
systems, or alterations to the following
utilities:
Power or natural gas? X,
Communications systems? X
Water? X
Sewer or septic tanks? X
Storm water drainage? X
Solid waste and disposal? X
17. Human Health - Will the proposal have
,significant results in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health
hazard (excluding mental health)? X
-5-
0 0
YES MAYBE NO
Aesthetics - Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal result in
creation of an aesthetically offensive
public view? x
Recreation - Will the proposal have
significant results in the impact upon
the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? x
Archeological/Historical - Will the
proposal have significant results in
the alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site,
structure, object orbuilding? x
Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter-
nate sites for the proposed, and g) no projectalternative.
N/K. Phased development of project is not necessary since
grading only consists for one single family dwelling unit.
Alternate site design is possible, but applicant has
designed project to have a minimal impact on this site.
C. N/A. Scale of development is consistent with General
Plan.
N/A. Proposed use is consistent with General Plan. and
Zoning Ordinance.
Development at some future time would leave the lot
vacant. The proposed site is zoned for development of a
single family residence, and development at this time
would be appropriate.
Grading was specifically designed for the proposed site~.
An alternate site would require a change in grading.
A "no project" alternative would leave the lot vacant.
M M.
7
YES MAYBE NO
22. Mandatory findings of significance -
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, or curtail the diversity
in the environment? x
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals.? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) x
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but
cumulatively,considerable? (A
project may impact on two or more
separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is
significant.) X,
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human.beings,
either directly or indirectly? x
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The proposed project consists of approximately 350 cubic yards
of grading for development of a single family residence. The
proposed project is harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood
and will nothave a significant impact on the environment.
The proposed 350. cubic yards of grading will not significantly
change the topography of the site. The grading is in
conformance with the City's Hillside Development Ordinance.
The proposed project is an infill project and will not
significantly affect any plant or animal life at the site.
Previous development in the area would have already disturbed
the habitat.
The project is in conformance with the General Plan and Zoning
designations for the site and will not significantly impact
traffic or housing. All public facilities needed for the site
are available and have been accounted for in the Local
-7-
0 0
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
Facilities Management Plan Zone 1.
Overall, staff feels that the proposed project will not have a
significant negative impact on the environment and feels
comfortable in issuing a Negative Declaration.
-8-
1]
DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X -I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
-I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measuresdescribed on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
-I find the proposed project MAY have a significant,effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
- 5)'-~ (9 16 ~)
Date sl~ppatur6
Date Planning Director
MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
0 0
VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date signAure
-10-