HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.88.10; PHILLIPS SEA WALL; Engineering ApplicationApplication for Grading Permit P E ~-N 0. 0
&PtJ CITY OF CARLSBAD
E.NG.INEERI,NG DEPARTMENT
1200 Elm Avenue
Validation by Finance 43&4"1 a-SYD Department
Building Permit Plan Check No.
FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN
Site Add 21,&~M%,47 M~F~ ST,
Surety Company Bond No.
Legal Description Map No. I Surety Address
urrs 179 1 E , Suz- A MAP )z2- j .0
Subdivision'Name Date Filed Rec'd by
wmes LANr-) (!cmPANYAcp7iVN TO eAQ_q~AD
Owner Phone Cash deposit Rec'd by Date filed
M JAtiL 1_:~7_ 2, ~ $
Owner's Address i?57R~7_ The following documents are required and shall becomer a part
1_3oq LA rz VieRA vz srEA of the grading permit when they are approved.
- Grading plans Specifications
— Soil report Geologic Report
Plans by Civil Engineer R.C.E.
WMD/ F~7. ENIZOWN 34're?o
Address Phone
5'Z7 W~ H WZ 101 1 saAmA EEAM 491 - 7 Ov 8 Drainage structures Other
Compaction report Soil Engineer R.C.E. ftone
94W J4MQZ1&4jTt)Nj -So4je6
Grading Contractor Phone SPECIAL CONDITIONS'WHICH ARE MADE
A PART OF THIS PERMIT
Address 1.~ Authorized hours of operation:
7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday.
Party responsible for overall supervision
2. Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer.
Proposed use of grade site .
R'PFZ4p Rp-eMe\r FO Z BEACH GEto Ctj aWr'FZL 3 Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation -
control. Number of cubic yards
Cut Fill Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per City Code.
Proposed Schedule of Start Finish All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum
Operations (dates) density unless noted otherwise.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that
the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply w. ith.
all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is:
and the
'
provisions and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to El REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections
this application. listed below.
0 CONTROLLEDGRADING - Private -grading engineer shall
Signature of.Permittee observe work, coordinate tests, make reports.
INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE
Owner or authorized agent
Initial - site prep.
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE -
Date Rough - prior to drains
E I A'Log No.
Grading permit fee $
'Permit Issued
hv
Permit Expiration Date
BY
Nnal - s opes p an e
Plan check fee $ Compaction reports rec'd.
Private engr. cart. rec'd.
Date Copies: White-Office; Green-Building;
Yellow-inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod-Finance
THISFORMWHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED ISAPERMITTODOTHEWORK DESCRIBED
THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD
M
M
FEE: $175.00
RECEIPT NO.:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I
(To Be Completed by APPLICANT)
CASE NO:
DATE: 2/11/88
Applicant: Jack Phillips
Address of Applicant: 9309 La Riviera Drive Ste A
Sacramento, California 95826
Phone Number: ( 916 362-1328
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other t - han
Applicant): Sowards and Brown Engineering 527 No Highway 101 Ste E
Solana Beach, CA 92075 (619) 481-7818
GENERAL INFORMATION:,
Description of Project: Construct rip-rap sea wall protection similar
to all other developed properties in the vicinity
Project Location/Address: 2665 and 2667 Ocean~ Street Carlsbad, CA
Assessor Parcel Number: 203-140-il3
Zone of*Subject Property: R-3
Proposed Use of Site: Existing 2-Unit residential with no proposed improvements
List all other applicable applications related to this project:
Grading Permit (City of Carlsbad)
Coastal Permit
0
FEE: $175.00
RECEIPT NO:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I
('To Be Completed by APPLICANT)
CASE NO:
DATE: 12/3/87
Applicant: Jack Phillips
Address of Applicante 9309~ La Riviera ~Drive Ste A
Sacramento, California 95826
Phone Number: ( 916 ) 362-1328
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than
Applicant) Sowards and Brown Engineering 527 No Highway 101 Ste E
Solana Beach, CA 92075 (619) 481-7818
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Description of Project: Construct rip-rap sea wall protection similar
to all other developed properties in the vicinity
Project Location/Addre,ss: 2665 and 2667 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA
Assessor Parcel Number: 203-1407:.13
Zone of Subject Property:
Proposed Use of Site: Existing 2-Unit residential with no proposed improvements
List all other applicable applications related to this project:
Grading Permit (City of Carlsbad)
Coastal Permit
Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man~
made character is-tics; also provide precise slope analysis when
appropriate.
Place 2 - Ton rock rip-rap at toe of existing slope
Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design
and/or operation of the project.
N/A
If residential, include the number of units, schedule of uni,t sizes,
range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected.
2 existing units with no proposed improvementsor construction
1 - one bedroom
1 - two bedroom
If commercial, indicate the type # whether neighborhood,-city or
regionally oriented, square footage of sale,s area, and loading
facilities.
N/A
If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and
loading facilities..
N/A
If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment Der
shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits
to be derived from the project.
N/A
- Z -
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate
space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional s~eets as
necessary.)
YES NO
Could the project significantly change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activity? X
Could the activity affect the use of a recreational
area, or area of important aesthetic Value? X
Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood? X
Could the activity result in the displacement of
community residents? X
Could the activity increase the number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city? X
Could the activity decrease the number of low and
modest cost hous:ing units in the city? X
Are any of the natural or man-made features in the
activity Area unique, that is, not found in other
parts of the county, state or nation? X
Could the activity significantly affect an
historical or archaeological site or its settings? X
Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource? X
Does the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural reso,urce? _X
Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life? X
Are there any rare or endangered plant species
in the activity area? X
Could the Activity change exi,sting features of
any of the, city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? X
Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches? X
Could the activity result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands? X
16). 'Could the activity serve to encourage development
of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop-
ment of already developed areas? X
-3-
Ll
0 0
YES NO
will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water,
noise, etc.)?
Will the activity require certification, authoriza-
tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state. or
federal environmental control agency? X
Will the activity require issuance of a variance
or conditional usepermit by the City?
Will the activity involve the application, use, or
disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
Will the activity involve construction of
faclilities in a flood plain?
Will the activity involve
facilities in the area of
construction of
' an active fault?
Will the activity involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 2.5 percent or greater?
Could the activity result in the generation of~
significant amounts of noise?
Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of dust?
Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
Could the activity result in a signif.icant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's air
or water resources? (Shouldznote surface, ground
water, o.ff-s,hore.)
Will th~e project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas.,-etc.)?
Will there be a significant change to existing
land form?
Indicate estimated grading to be done in
cubic yards: 85
Percentage of alterat.ion to the present
land form: .10%
Maximum height of cut or fill slopes:
5
import of approximately
85 cubic yards or rock
rip-rap
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
FIN
30)
31)
Will the activity result in substantiall increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets?
Is the activity carried out as part of a larger
project or series of projects?
-4-
J
0 0
STATEMENT OF-NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
'If you have answered yes to one or more of the:questions in Section
I but you think the activity will have no significant envimnmental
effects, indicate your reasons below:
The placement of rip-rap will be in conformance with all other developed
lots in the neighborhood while providing approximately the same beach
front area west of the rip-rap as other properties west of their
sea wall protection. The rip-rap construction requires obtaining
a Coastal Permit
COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I,
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach
additional sheets as needed.)
Signature /--<~ — 0 cti-n t,4. e-!;~, T&D (Person6 comp.eting Report)
'At aek-1
Date Signed_
0
0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. PE 2.88.10
DATE: March 7. 1988
2.
BACKGROUND
APPLICANT: -Jack Phillips
ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 9309 La Riviera Drive,
Suite A, Sacramento,. California 958.26
DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: February 11, 1988
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written
under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth - Will. the proposal
have significant results in:
Unstable earth.conditions
or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering
of the soil? X
Change in topography or ground
surface relief features? X
The destruction, covering of
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features? X
Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or
off the site? _.X
Changes in deposition or erosion
of,beach sands, or changes in
siltation,,-deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel or a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
YES MAYBE NO
2. Air - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? X
The creation of objectionable
odors? X
Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally? X
3. Water - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters? X
Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patters, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff? X
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters? X
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body? X
Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to, temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? X
Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters? X
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations? X
,h.. Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies? X
-2-
0 0
YES MAYBE NO
4. Plant Life - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants? X
Introductio~n of new species of plants
into an area, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species? X
Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop? X
5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)? X
Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? X
Introductionof new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of
animals? —X
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly
increase existing noise levels7 X
7. Light andGlare - Will the proposal sig-
nificantly produce new light or glare? X
8. Land Use - Will the proposal have
significant results in the alteration of
the present or planned land use of an
area? X
~3-
YES MAYBE NO
9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources? X
Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource? X
10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident
or upset conditions? X
lie Population - Will the proposal signif-
icantly alter the location, distribu-
tion, density, or growth rate of the
human population of an area? X
Housing - Will the proposal signif-
icantly affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? X
Transportation/Circulation - Will the
proposal have significant results in:
Generation of additional vehicular
movement? X
Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking? X
Impact upon existing,transportation
systems? X
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? X
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic? X
Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? X
V
-4-
0
YES MAYBE NO
14. Public Services - Will the proposal have
a significant effect upon, or have signif-
icant results in the heed for new or
altered governmental services in any of
the following areas,:
Fire protection? _X
Police protection? X
Schools? X
Parks or other recreational
facilities? — X
Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? X
other governmental services? X
,15. Energy - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? X
Demand upon existing sources of
energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy? X
1,6. Utilities - Will the proposal have
significant results in the need for new
systems, or alterations to the following
utilities:
a., Power or natural gas? X
b. Communications systems? X
Water? X
Sewer or septic tanks? X
Storm water drainage? X
Solid waste and disposal? X
17. Human Health - Will the proposal have
significant results in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health
hazard (excluding mental health)? X
-5-
0 0
YES MAYBE NO
Aesthetics - Will the Proposal have
significant results in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal result in
creation of an aesthetically offensive
public view? X
Recreation - Will the proposal have
significant results in the impact upon
the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? X
Archeolocrical/Historical - Will the
proposal have significant results in
the alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site,
structure, object or building? X
Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed protect such as:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs,
c), alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter-
nate sites for the proposed, andg) no project alternative.
The proposed rip rap sea wall, is the least obtrusive measure to protect
the cliff and provide a sea barrier. The alternatives such as block
wall, timber, retaining wall, or granite are more aesthetically disruptive
than the proposed rip-rap..
The alternative of no project allows no protection of the bluff face from
the sea. It would also prevent the owner from building a patio such as is
enjoyed by many neighbors.
CM
0 El
Ll 0
YES MAYBE NO
22. mandatory findings of significance -
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, or curtail the diversity
in the environment? - X
Does the project have thepotential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) - X
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A
project may impact on two or more
separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is
significant.) — X
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? X
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
1. Earth II-1b. 1c, lf
The existing bluf f is covered with Carpobrotus ice plant. The proposed
rip rap will cover the existing bluff face, and prevent erosion of the
bluff or deposit of the existing bluff-face material on the beach.
3. Water 3b
The proposed rip-rap with filter fabric will alter the absorption/run-off
pattern, but will not necessarily add to the amount of surface water run-
off, since the uneven rip rap surface will hold water and slow down run-
off.
-7-
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
4. Plant Life 4a
The elimination of the existing ice plant will not change the diversity of
plant species since this is a common bluff face plant.
18. Aesthetics
The proposed rip rap wall may not, be as aesthetically. pleasing to many
viewers as the existing green bluff. However, the rip rap itself is a
natural product and will blend with the rocky beach and is compatible with
other sea walls in the area.
Evaluation
The proposed rip rap wall will protect the bluff and allow the owner to
build a concrete patio. The height of the wall at 10 feet will cover
only the lower portion of the slope, and the existing planted slope will
remain at the higher levels. The proposed gradient of 1.5:1 is similar to
the existing slope-.
Many neighboring properties have erected similar sea-walls, and the
adjacent property to the south has a block wall built to the same property
line setback. The proposed wall conforms to the existing protective
structures on this part of the shoreline and will provide protection to
the bluff from erosion by wave action.
A permit from the Coastal Commission is required for this structure.
IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
on the basis of this initial evaluation:
X —I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
—I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been,added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will beproposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
~~ z 4Q z fe-s~ C=g"z - Date sl~'hatare /
-8-
~,.a it ta : St-i r - ogmus a. i;,- 3 -,en 'n ~ ret -'.n. a cramen :.a. c A 4 iee :,6,:E iei~w
NOTICE WPLETIC14 AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FORM
SCH #
Project Title: Rip RaI2 Sea Wall.
LeadAgency: City of Carlsbad Planning Dept. Contact Person- Murray FulfoFd-
3a. Street Addrqss: 2075 Las Palmas Drive - 3b. City:. Carlsbad
3c. County: San Diego 3d. Zip: 92009 3e. Phone: (619) 438-11,61
PROJECT L6CAT,-.:'-`4 IL- -County: San Diego -- 4a. Cl.ty/Cofirtunity: Carlsbad
4b.(Optioral) Assessor's Parcel No. 203-140-13 4c. Section Twp. Range
Sa. Cross Streets: Beech/Del Mar Ave. Sb. rFor Rurkl .
Nearest Community:
within 2 miles of: State fty No. 1 -5 b. Airports c. Waterways Pacific Ocean
OCCUMENT TYPE S. LCCAL ACTION TYPE Id. DEVELOPMENT TYPE'
CEQA 01 General Plan Update 01 X Units 2 Acres
01 Mop 02' New Element 02 __jffice. Sq.Ft.
02 Early Cons 03 General Plan Amenc!ment Acres
03 -114@9 Dec 04 ___!taster Plan 03 Shopping/Commercial: Sq.Ft.
04 -Sraf t EIR as Annexation Acre -Emplayees
05 Suppleftent/ 06 Specific Plan 04 Industrial: Sq.Ft.
—Subsequent EIR
(if so, prior SCH 07 Redevelopment Acres -Employses_
as Rezone 05 —Sewer: No
NEPA 09 Land Division do Water: MG0
TTubdivisian. Parcel Map.
06 ---.Potice of -,ntent Tract map. etc.) 07 Transportation: Type
07 Envir. 'Assessment/ 10 Use Permit 08 Mi neral Extraction- Mineral
—1FOKS1
11 Ag Preserve --Sancel 09 Power Generation: Wattage
08 Draft EIS
12 xOther Grading Permit Type,:
OTHER 10 her:
09 Infnrmation Only
9. TOTAL ACRES: 30 cu. yds.
10 Final Document
11 Other
11. PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT
01 XAesthetiC/VrJ3UaI 08 ---Pool ogi CAM smi c A Sewer Capacity 22 Water Supply
02r Agricultural Land og _-:)obs/Housing Balance 16 X Soil.Erosion 23 Wetland/Riparian
03 kir.Quality 10 Minerals 17 Solid waste 24 wildlife ' '.
04 Archaeological/Historical 11 Noise - 18 Toxic/Hazardous 25 Growth Inducing
05 XCoastal 12 Public Services 19 Traffic/Circulation 26 - Incompatible Landuse
'06 Fire Hazard 13 Schools 20 Xvegetation 27 Cumulative Effects
07 Flooding/Drai,nage 14 Septic Systems 21 Water Quality 28 Other
12. FUNDING approx.) Federal S state S Total S
PRESENT LAND USE ANO ZONING:
Residential - R-3
'PROJECT OESCRIPTION-
Construction of a rip rap sea wall, similar to others on adjacent properties.
SIGNATURE OF LEAD AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: -2aacea iaaldae f- Oate Airet/-- & 19d
,40TE: 0earingnouso will issign identification numbers. !or all new projects. If a SC4 Number already exists for a prolect
(g.g. from a. Notice of Preparation or previous draft aoc=e"t) ploase fill it in.
Resources Agen~y CTRPA (CalTRPA)
Air Resources Board TRPA (Tahoe RPA)
Conservation Bay Conservation & Dev't Cow
Fish and Game Parks' and Recreation
Coastal Commission Office of Historic Preservation
Caltrans District Native American Heritage Comm
Caltrans - Planning State Lands Comm
Caltrans - Aeronautics Public Utilities Comm
California Highway Patrol Energy Cam
Boating and Waterways-- Foo4 and Agriculture
Forestry Health Services
State Water Resources Contro'l Statewide Health Planning (hospitals)
Board - Headquarters Housing and Community Dev't
Regional Water Quality Control Corrections
Board, Region General Services
Division of Water Rights (SWRCB) Office of Local Assistance
Division of Water Quality (SWRCB) Public Works Board
—,Department of Water Resources Office of Appropriate Technology (OPR)
Reclamation Board Local Government Unit (OPR)
Solid Waste Management Board ,Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy
Colorado River Board Other
FOR SCH USE ONLY
Date Received at SCH Catal.og Number
Date Review Starts Proponent
Date to Agencies Consultant
Date to SCH Contact Phone
Cl,earance Date Address
Notes:-