The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPE 2.88.13; MCMAHAN REALTY COMPANY; Engineering ApplicationApplication for Grading Permit CITY OF. CARLSBAb . ENGINEERING DERARTIVIENT 2075 Las PAImas, Drive 438-3550 PE N 8-13 APO .461".W-0 Validation by Finance Department 1_A-tTww ~4- CA4-bi7- FOR'APPLICANT TO FILL IN Site Address Loker Ave.,,'Carlsbad 9200-8 Surety,Compan wi;s ry ~Wsw'w @P4bV_88.-000MJL?109V0QA44,Aj Legal Description Map No. 2 372 Mot .1.0 Surety-A dire RISC 260-00 SA D 'eo C41ZL,56M, CA o ca 1-k 200? Subdivision Name F b DIFiled JUCA shic d Tr&Ct No. 74-21 'Carl -i Owner Ph, ,..McMahan Realty Company q 110 Ca y bate.filed. 5k4~ 7 J'a Owner's Address g clocurnen red.;ind shall become a part 2333-Statd. Street-, Cat:1sbad.i. CA'92008 of Ahe grading permit when they' are approved. Grading plan % s Specifications Plans by.Civil. Engineer R.C.E. .Charles R. De6k 31757- --"Soil reppi-t Geologic, Report. ~~Drain'a ge t ____~~Other -s ructures _A~f_ Address Pacif iC Land Surveyinghonie, 2 20A Garnet Avenue, S e. 103,'~'_- 270-4918 _A~Compaction report Soil, Engineer* R.C.E. Phone Anth ny _F.1 Belfast- 58.7-0250 SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE'. 'Graclin~I, C' n- actor Phone 7Z i LLAM QiST !42 1 (06~s_ -':A PART OF THIS PERMIT Address wall C LJL, vt 20 11, sk 1 Authorized hours of operation: a eo (A 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday.. -Party responsi4le. fdr-bverall striSehision 2., Haul routes are to be approved by,City Engin . eer. Proposed us# of,gracle site *V- 2 story,.Corporate Headquarter",s 3.- Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siftition Number of cubic yards control. Cut Fill Import Waste .4. All slopes shall be plarited per City Co cle. 4203 4100-2 _7 2-2 0 1':- Proposed Schedule of Start Finish 5. All fills.to,be compacted to, at least 90%.of,optimum. Operations. (dates) density unless noted,otherwise. I hereby acknowledge that I have read, thiapplication and'state that the information I have provided is correct and aigree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavatirig.and grading, Un.der'City Code Sec.-11.06 170-this grading is: and the provisions and conditions',of any permit issued pursuant to .0 REGULAR GRADING - City inspector wi I(. make'll nspect ions this applicapon. listed,.belo' W.- CONTROLLED GRADING Private grading engineer shall Signature of Peimittee observe work; coordinate tests, make reports. 73 IN.SPECTIoN DATE INSP. SIGNATURE _QoAmr.~w authorized agen C_~ Lancl. initial - site prep. 1~8 -ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - Date ~3' Rpugh - prior to drains --:>//- e- 96 EIA Log No. t,)3 Final - slopes planted BV y Compaction reports rec'd.' 11 Grading p I ermit fee $ -00 Plan: check feel $. r te-engr. cert. r6c'd. a ue Permit lj~ d Ar by 6e_KrE7~1~ Uate. I -,oTF4_-5 C pies:. Whit&-Of . fice; Green-Building; Permit Expiraitio6af. Yello'w-lnipecidr; Pink-Perm,ittee,- Goldenrod-Finance THISFORMWHEN PROPER'LYVALIDATED IS APER,MJTTO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED THIS PERMIT IS'VALID FOR A SIX (6)'MONTH PERIOD 6 FEE: $175.00 RECEIPT NO: 81800 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To ~Be Completed by APPLICANT) CASE NO: DATE: 3/11/88 Applicant: McMahan Realty Company Address of Applicant: 2333 State Street, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone Number: ( 61.9) 458-0440 Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): Mr- Charles.Deck, Paciftc Land Surveying, 2204 Garnet.Avenue, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92109 (619) 270-4918 GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: -Two story office building with 165 'parking spaces Project Location/Addresz: Lot~t of Carlsbad Tract No. 74-21 of Map No. 10372 on Loker Avenue. Assessor Parcel Number: 859 -' 021 - 74-75 Zone of Subject Property: . PM Proposed Use of Site: 'Commercial Office Building List all other applicable applications related to this project: None IP 67-89 F ~Jz. f-, le PEz.j3J')J Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man- made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. Existing graded flat pad. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. As required by City code and UBC (see Architect's drawings for details). If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. N/A If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. Regionally - Corporate Headquarters.. 3,000 s.f. of office space with 1 loading dock If industrial, indicate type, estimated,employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived,from the project. N/A -2- I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessary.) YES NO 1) Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? X ~2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? X Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? X Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? X Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? X Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? X Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity.area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? X Could the activity significantly affect an historical or archaeological.site or its settings? X Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? X Does the activity significantly Affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Could the-activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? Are there Any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays,, or tidelands? Could the activity change existing features of .any of the city's beaches? . Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination of agricultural lands? Could the activity serve to e ' ncourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed areas? M-C X R. X X X X 91 YES NO Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? X W ' ill the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? X Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? X Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? X Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? X Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? X Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? X Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? X Will the activity involve the burning of-brush, trees, or other materials? X 27) Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground X water, off-shore.) 28) Will the project substantially increase fuel X consumption (.electricity,oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Will there be a significant change to existing X land form? Indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards: 5358 CY Percentage of alteration Fo—the present land form: 24% Maximum hei-gUt—of cut or slopes: 41 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utiliti'es, sewers, drains or streets? X 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? X -4- STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in;Section I but you think the activity will have no.significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION.I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions t 'attach additional sheets as needed.) Signature (Person / F1 C 4,1., p 1 i"t 'in g por , - ;ZCE 3:3 7.'97 Date Signed -7 /11 119* -5- 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORK - PART II (TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. PIP 87-2. PE,2.88.13 DATE: May 4. 1988 APPLICANT: — Pacific Land Surveying ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2204 Garnet Avenue, Suite 103, San Diego, California 92109 DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: March 9. 1988 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanatio - ns of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in: Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? x Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? x Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x The destruct' -ion, covering of modification of any unique geologic or physical features? x Any increase in wind or water i erosion of soils, either on or off the site? x f.' Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x 0 YES MAYBE NO 2. Air - Will the proposal have~ significant results in: Air emissions or deterioration of'amb.ient,air quality? X The creation of objectionable- odors? X Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X Alterations to the courseor flow of flood waters? X Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X Discharge into surface waters, or in any .alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals,or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X -2- 0 0 YES MAYBE NO 4. Plant Life Will the proposal have significant results in: Change inthe diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, micro.flora and aquatic plants)? X Reduction of the'numbers of any unique, rare ok,endangered species of plants? X Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X 5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish ,and shellfish, benthic-organisms, insects or microfauna)? X Reduction.of the numbers of any unique., rare or endangered species of animals? X Introduction of new'species of animals into an,area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Noise ' - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? RP 7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly producenew light or glare? 8. Land Use - Will the proposal have ,significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? : —X X -3- YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal have,-significant results in: Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X 10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 11. PORulation - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? - X 12. Housing - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13. TrAnsRortationZCirculation Will the proposal have significant results in: Generation of additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? Impact upon existing transportation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? — X X — X - X — X — — X 0 YES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services .- Will the proposialhave a significant effect up'on,'or have signif- icant results in -the need for new or altered-governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? X Police protection7 X Schools? X Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X Other governmental services? X 15. Ene M - Will the proposal have significant results in: Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — X Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems., or alterations to the following utilities: Power or naturalgas? X Communications systems? X Water? X Sewer or septic tanks? X Storm water drainage? X Solid waste and disposal? X 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X -5- YES MAYBE NO Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction . of Any scenic vista or view open to t he public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X Archeological/Historical - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a,signif.icant. archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X Analyze viable alternatives to the RroRosed Rroject such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a) The project consists of one building, and does not permit phasing. b) Alternate site design would have little effect since the pad is pre-graded. C) Proposed grading will have little visual effect and is designed to accommodate the building and provide adequate slope for the parking area. Since area is zoned for industrial use in an existing industrial park, and the pad is already graded for this type of building and use, thereis no viable alternate use. Later development would leave a pre-graded pad with no aesthetic or environmental value. YES MAYBE NO 22. Mandatory findings of significance Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, Or curtail the diversity in the environment? X Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term-impacts will endure well into the future.) X Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1) Earth: Grading is proposed to allow construction of the proposed'office buildings. The pad is already rough-graded, and the proposed grading requires no removal or import of soil. There will be no significant impact to the soil since it is already disturbed. Water: Construction of buildings and paving will affect absorption rates and run-of f patterns. However, the required provisions for drainage, and the irrigation of landscaped areas will offset any adverse impacts. Plant Life, 5) Animal Life: Some natural vegetation has been removed, an ' d the area contains no signifcant plant or animal life. Ornamental plants will be introduced in the landscaping area. Landscaping plans will. be reviewed by the Planning Department to ensure compatibility with existing conditions and vegetation,on and offsite. mm 0 0 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) Light and Glare: -Incremental increase will, occur, since -the property is currently . undeveloped. However, since the surrounding area is -zoned for' similar use, there will not be any adverse impact.- Hou sing: Job opportunities offered by new industrial development may cause an-increaseddema~nd for--.'housing. The City of Carlsbad General -Plan has allocated areas for residential development within the City which will provide sufficient additional housing. Transportation/Circulation: The project will result in increased traffic and parking requirements. The Engineering Department conditions require . that all necessary street improvements and parking be provided prior to occupancy. Public Services, 16) Utilities: The Local Facilities Management Plan -for the zone ensures, that all public and gover I nmental services will be available when required. The incremental impacts on public facilities will be offset by fees prior to building permit issuance. The site is in an Industrial Subdivision (CT 74-21). The project provided rough-graded pads*for custom built.industrial buildings. The proposed project is in conformance with all requirements of the General Plan and City Ordinances,, and all impacts have been assessed and mitigated by the -conditions of the Local Facilities Management Plan and the individual project fees. -8- IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department.) On the basis of this initial,evaluation: -I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. -I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the,mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. -I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. e -~-~Date Signat;rr , MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable) 0 .0 MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE,ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO'THE PROJECT. Date Signature -10- CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGIAEERIN6 DEPARTMENT FEES AND DFPOSITS VORKSHEET PREPARED BY: PROJECT MARE: Q In DATE: 9 - Y--Fe TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FEE . . . '* . . . . . . . . . qr, MAP FEE LOTSXPARCE~ MA;/;I;A~ ;AP* NO. OF L;T; —)s (EXPEDITED/NOT EXPEDITED) PARCEL MAP EXTENSION FEE . . . . . . . . IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK FEE: DEPOSIT WITH SUBM,ITTAL RECEIPT NO. —NT DESCRIPTION BONDED VALUE TOTAL: X A/ /A PERCENTAGE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION FEE: I= TOTAL: -- ----x --J /A PERCENTAGE PARK-IN-LIEU FEE (CIRCLE ONE): DWELLING TYPE: SF OR DUPLEX AREA: 1 2 3 4 NUMBER OF UNITS: STREET LIGHT ENERGIZING: MF (<4 UNITS) MF (> 4 UNITS) NH X AREA FEE/U—NIT 0 AJ-1A 5,800 LUNEN AT 81.00 - 5,500 LUNEN. AT 111.06 = 16,000 LUNEN AT 152.10 = 20,000 LUNEN AT 169.38 = 1A TOTAL: GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE DEPOS.IT RECEIPT NO. (EXPEDITED/NOT EXPEDITED) GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE (10-203 CUBIC YARDS) GRADING CASH DEPOSIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DUPLICATE TRACING FEE . . . . . . . . . . . . STREET SIGN DEPOSIT: AT AT AT TOTAL' STREET STRIPING DEPOSIT . . . . 0 : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FRONT LINE OR AREA FEES.(TYPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DRAINAGE AREA FEE (AREA NO. — 0 0 0 0 0 * a 1 0 , 0 6 0 o TOTAL ACRES:— X AREA FEE LESS VALUE OF MASTER, IDPAIAAAF IMPROVEMENTS AS NOTED IN mmifERDRAIN4F PLAN.DOCUNENTS MULTIPLIED BY CURRENT INFLATION FACTOR. LINE VALUE, X FACTOR AMOUNT X X TOTAL: DRAINAGE FEE DUE: ADDITIONAL FEES: ,TYPE: TYPE: .,o -T;TA,L8 FE9ES9 A6NDQ D*EP9OS'l"T9S:' (IN ADDITION, A GRADING PERNlTfEE OF *-2, iS-DUE UPON ISSUANCE OF THE GRADING'RERMITJ