The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPE 2.88.21; ROBERT HICKS SINGLE FAMILY HOME; Engineering ApplicationH I. Application for Grading Permit CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7— 2075 Las Palmas Drive 438-3550 Building Permit Plan Check No; FOR APPLICANT-TO FILL IN 4k PENO. Validation by Finance Department Site AddMss L&y'4c.1 Surety Company 2732 10/27/88 000qi' N005 A*6WET SU1ETy llJ444 Co. I/07 Legal cription -. -e-cL (4' Map No. I IL/bOo I Surety Address P0 go)( 45,00),i..JooDi*l RILLS CA. 9135 Caubdivision Name -- Date Filed Rec'd by 0wn Phone - Cash deposit' Rec'd by Date filed $ 1818.20 Owners.Ad1ress P-10 - '7W'YtSJ, .I:i_;, .~ - The following documents are required and shall become a part of the grading permit when they are approved. / Grading plans Specifications PIa Civil Engineer - R.C.E. - / Soil report Geologic Report Drainage structures _____ Other Compaction report Phone Address ,( , -•t- . 79 Soil En eer R.C.E. Phone Phone . Grading tractor - SPECIALCONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE A PART OF THIS PERMIT Address 0 Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday- Friday. Party re ' L Z or overall supervision t_ Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. - Proposed f grade site - Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation 'control. Number of cubic yards Cut Fill - Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per Guy Code. Proposed Schedule of Operations (dates) Start i'I. Finish 5. ,,_' - All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum density unless noted otherwise. I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that - - the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with' all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, and the provisions and conditions of any permitissued pursuant to this application. Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: D'REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections listed below. Signature of Permittee ________________________________________ El CONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall observe work, coordinate tests, make reports. Owner or authorized agent INSPECTION - DATE INSP. SIGNA - site prep. Initial ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - Date O-.t•?- ., EIA Log No. ____________ ______ y , B L Rough - prior to drains - Final - slopes planted Grading permit fee $ - Plan check fee $ 350 Compaction Permit ijodt 'd. o by A "" '" ____ yate Copies: White-Office;. Green-Building; Permit Expiration Date - Yellow-Inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod-Finance I b-NI--' " THIS FO-RAWHEicj PTOIERLYVALIDATED IS A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED - THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD Z 1b V7 I CITY OF CARLSBAD EN6INEERIN6 DEPARTMENT FEES AND DEPOSITS WORKSHEET PREPARED BY: ,4f,ad54-5 PROJECT NAME:. I1iCK5 7R4I1J6' PZ,4iV DATE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FEE ... . . . . . . . . • . . . . .... ... • • . ., MAP FEE ( LOTS)(PARCEL MAP/FINAL MAP NO. OF LOTS (EXPEDITED/NOT EXPEDITED) PARCEL MAP EXTENSION FEE . . . . . . . . . . IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK FEE: DEPOSIT WITH SUBMITTAL RECEIPT NO. IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION BONDED VALUE TOTAL: X PERCENTAGE IMPROVEMENT INSPECTION FEE: ITEM VALUE TOTAL: _________________ X PERCENTAGE PARK-IN-LIEU FEE (CIRCLE ONE): DWELLING TYPE: SF OR DUPLEX MF (<4 UNITS) MF (> 4 UNITS) MH AREA: 1 2 3 4 NUMBER OF UNITS: X AREA FEE/UNIT STREET LIGHT ENERGIZING: - 5800 LUMEN AT. 81.00 9,500 LUMEN •AT 111.06 16,000 LUMEN AT 152.10 20000 LUMEN AT 169.38 TOTAL: GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE DEPOSIT RECEIPT NO. 80105 H"'/NOT EXPEDITED) 00 GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE (_3o CUBIC YARDS) . . . .. . . . . 7. GRADING CASH DEPOSIT • • • . .•. . . wioo .). . DUPLICATE TRACING FEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . STREET SIGN DEPOSIT: AT AT AT TOTAL: = STREET STRIPING DEPOSIT .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FRONT LINE OR AREA FEES (TYPE ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DRAINAGE AREA FEE (AREA NO. . . . . . . . . . . ........ TOTAL ACRES: ________ X ________ = • AREA FEE LESS VALUE OF MASTER DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AS NOTED IN itR DRAINAGE PLAN DOCUMENTS MULTIPLIED BY CURRENT INFLATION FACTOR. LINE VALUE.. X FACTOR AMOUNT ____ ___ X x _____ ___ X TOTAL: DRAINAGE FEE DUE: ADDITIONAL FEES: . . . _________________________ TYPE: ________________________________ • . . . . . . . . . . . . TVDC. . __________________________________ I • I I I I I I I . TOTAL FEES AND DEPOSITS: . . . . • (IN ADDITION, A GRADING PERMIT FEE OF IS DUE UPON ISSUANCE OF THE GRADING PERMIT.) * AssessorParcel Number: / 1 - Cl/Cl - Zone of Subject Property: '-4- /c Proposed Use of Site: • FEE: $175.00 RECEIPT NO: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To Be Completed by APPLICANT) CASE NO: 'PE 2'.2.j DATE: Applicant: c_ks Address of Applicant: '( 446 5 eA2S1?.41. e4 Phone Number: ()q)I3I/57 Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: /41 iei List all other applicable applications related to this project: / /11/14 Oc 7S PE 017- g'. 7- . . Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man- made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. - Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. 404e) c 7/e, 'd'ec If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. cWe 644 If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. -2- I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessary.) - YES NO Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? Could the activity significantly affect an historical or archaeological site or its settings? Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Does the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination of agricultural lands? Could the activity serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed areas? -3- YES NO 17) Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? 18.) Will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? . Could the activity result in the generation of V/ significant amounts of dust? Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? 27) Could the activity result in .a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) 28) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? I V/ Indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards: 30 Percentage of alteration to the present land form: XAtF5 74%i,tl Jo q Maximum height of cut or fill slopes: 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? ____ 31) Is, the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series,of projects? -4- II. STATEMENT OF-NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have 'answered yes to one or mote of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) Signature on Completing Report Date Signed ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PORN - PART II (TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. PE 2.88.21 DATE: October 3, 1988 I BACKGROUND 1 APPLICANT Robert Hicks 2: ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: P.O. Box 4656 - Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 438-4957 3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: September 15, 1988 II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE Rue 1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in: Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? Disruptions,, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? Change in topography 'or-ground ', surface relief features? The destruction,coveringof. modification àf any 'unique- geologic or physical features? Any increase in wind .or water • erosion of soils, either on or off the site? Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion 'which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X X x H: x x I x x X x X YES MAYBE NO S 2. Air - Will the proposal have significant results in: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: Changes in currents, Or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters,? Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and, amount of surface water runoff?. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Change in the amount ofsurface water in any water body? ... Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? - -2- NO x - . YES 4. Plant Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Reduction in acreage-of any. , agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life.- Will the proposal have, significant resu1ts in: Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals. (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? 7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X X X X X X -3- . YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources' - Will the proposal have significant results in: 0 Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x Depletion of any nonrenewable ' natural resource? - , X 10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal , involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? x 11. Population - Will the proposal signif-y ' icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the ' human population of an area? X , 12. Housing - Will theproposa-1 signif- icantly affect existing-housing, or create a demand for additional housin? x 13. Transportation/Circu16tjon' - Will the proposal have significant results in: Generation of additional vehicular movement? X Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? x Impact upon existing transportation systems? - X , Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? ' X Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? x -4- .' YES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: 'V Fire protection? Police protection? C. Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Other governmental services? 15. Energy - Will the proposal have significant results in: Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: Power or natural gas? Communications systems? C. Water? Sewer or septic tanks? - V Storm water 'arainage? V Solid waste and disposal? - 17. Human Health -,Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X X X X -5- Aesthetics - Will the.proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Archeological/Historical/Paleontoloqical YES MAYBE NO - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or building? - x Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather-than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a) N/A. Phased development of project is not necessary since grading only consists for one single family dwelling unit. b) Alternate site design is possible, but applicant has designed project to have a minimal impact on this site. C) N/A. Scale of development is consistent with General Plan. N/A. Proposed use is consistent with General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. -, Development at some future time would leave the lot vacant. The proposed site is zoned for development of a single family residence, and development at this time would be appropriate. Grading was specifically designed for the proposed site. An alternate site would require a change in grading. A "no project" alternative would leave the lot vacant. S S YES MAYBE NO 22. Mandatory findings of significance - a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? b.Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The proposed project consists of approximately 300 cubic yards of cut and 200 cubic yards of fill for the construction of a single family dwelling. The proposed project is harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood and will not have a significant impact on the environment. The proposed project is an inf ill project and will not significantly affect any plant or animal life at the site. Previous development in the area would have already disturbed the habitat. The project is in- conformance with the General Plan and zoning designations for the site and will not significantly impact traffic or housing. All public facilities needed for the site are available and have been accounted for in the Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1. - .- - - -7- • DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) In summary, it appears that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and staff feels comfortable in issuing a Negative Declaration. - -8- IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date 10/5jtg Date V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable) H MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) ., . • k- i ••- SI VI. APPLICANT APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date si~nature (OS -10-