HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.88.38; LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT 4 LOT 711; Engineering ApplicationApplication for Grading Permit
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
~075 Las Palmas Drive
438-3550
Building Permit Plan Check No.
PE NO. 2 Oia,-3
Uaj 0 W~ Z .9Z - 7,4
Validation by Finance
Department
C ( p-r 4 :515e kc . 6S743
FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN
Site Address
71!~AUTA 'WA.Y*
Legal Description Map No.
L61 '71/ '73(.'7
Subdivision Name
LA C-0 S-TA )s
Owner Phone
11) -7 -) A
_Z_
7
Owner's Addr
pf' Plans by Civil Engineer
1) [Z A L
Address !SAt,~CLrz_mF_Wr~_:,C_
139 A~l F_ r~ I DA ~JA'sIAREn
Soil Engineer R.C.E. W
Grading Contrbctor
A V\ A) C a r7--r 0 r-- r7 ir
Address
1i6,o,7_ La W E. - C2A 6A
Party responsible for overall supervision
-JAMES Na.~-116,141QWEK
'Proposed use of grade site
ByiL-D A Smi-CiLE. FAMILY. QWF.LLIW(~
Number of cubic yards
Cut Fill Import Waste
5~ 8
Proposed Schedule of Start Finish
Operations (dates)
I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that
the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with
all Citv ordinances and State laws re ul-in - — ; 4 A ;
R.C.E.
. Phone .
'14 - 451 -
Phone
Phone
61 ~ -7-2 7 -275-
Surety Company Bond No.
~a6cllln Vista kat,0101 Ae,~L L+1 I- re
Surety Address
138S f qs-t Vi sta 1A a~i Vi S'~G CA 12- 0 8 q
Date Filed ec'd bv
~)e C 17, :k__
Cash deposit Ac'd b . y Date filed
$1730 'LW D6C 12,1988
The following documents are required and shall become a part
of the grading permit when they a~e approved.
Grading plans Specifications
Soil report - Gleologic Report
Drainage structures Other
Compaction report
t
SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE
A PART OF THIS PERMIT
1.. Authorized hours of operation:
7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday.
Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer.
Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation
control.
All slopes shall be planted per City Code.
5.- All f ills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum
density unless noted otherwise.
to tj ~ a nto an g, a ng,
and the provisions
'
and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to
this application. t4-
Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is:
ffr—REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections
listed below.
Sighature of.Permittee Qw,,t~ 0 CONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall
observe work, coordinate tests, make reports.
Owner or authorized agent
9
INSPECTION DATE IN§PPSIGNATUqg~~
Initial - site prep. t --:;,/ ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARA'NCE`~
Rough - prior to drains
EIA Log NOPE. 2. J396-38
Date 0 CT 2,b jiss
By Final - slopes planted
Grading permit fee $ 3S. 00 Pd Plan check fee' $35.00 Compaction reports rec'd.
Permit
ssDd I by XZ44 A42~~_ Date IwL 14, 157SY
Private engr.- cert. rec'd.
Copies: White-Office; Green-Building,-0
Yellow-inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenrod-Finance
ci Permit Expiration Date 4~ A640716S '04-11s,
THIS FO.RM 'WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS APERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED
THIS PERMI
-
T IS'VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD 4. '711S /,Io A,5 - 10 0 1
TELEPHONE 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
(619)438-1161 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859
Office of the City Engineer
Titu of Tartabalb
TO: DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES—
FROM: ENGINEERING . INSPECTION DIVISION
DATE: 00
JECT NO.
(P. E. or TRACT #)
N CO UE 7~- 00 N A \J 7-;~ F-4 M I %1Y Ae.V- (Project- Name and Address)
S-IAE~,W (AIA y 1A <-..-7-.A CA (Developer's Name and Address)
We have inspected the grading for Lot s or Pha se
~4
4t
of the above- mentioned project. - In addition, we. have received rough grading
certification from --"-rVAEAc!!—JiQfJ t4l!1-3 Z:Ve- the Soils Engineer,
dated and from. <-~-At— AM/ 43
the-Supervision Grading Engineer, da ted and are satisfied
that the rough grading has been completed in accordance. with Standards.
Based on these certifications and our observation, we take no exception to the
issuance of a building permit for' Lots or Phase of
project from a grading
standpoint. This release, however,, -is not intended to certify the project from
other engineering concerns including -site development, water or sewer availa-
bility, or final grading.
We will need to be advised prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
so that we -can verify that final grading and landscaping has been completed
i. n accordance with the approved plans for the project.
APPRO
lope
7~/ Mfv? K;~, A P-Y
Project Grading InspecItor Sr. Construct nspector
- 47e -
Cl TY OF CARLSBAD
G R A D 1 N G IkSPECTION . CHECKLIST ,,'
FOR-PA'RTIAL SITE RELEASE
PROJECT'INSPECTOR': DAT E.:
PROJECT ID: GRADING PERMIT NO.:
LOTS-REQUESTEDFOR RELEASE: _S A
N/A = Not Applicable
= Complete
0 = Incomplete or'unacc'eptable,
1 at. 2nd,.'
1 . Site 'access,to requested lots-adeqyate and.logically grouped
'Site. erosion control me asures ade.qua~ e,
Overall site adequate for',healthv *s'afety and welfare of public'
Letter of request for partial release.submitt6d
~J/A. 6-1-/211 '11'11 X' site plan'showin~.requested lot's submitted
Compaction .report from sails .en§ineer,submitted
Engineer-of-work certification of'work done and pad, elevations Ajl B. Geologic engineer's letter if unusual geologic or subsurface
conditions exist
9. Project conditions ,of ,approval checked for confl'16ts
10.. Can water service be'installed prior to bringing building
combustibles on site.
Partial release.of grading for the above stat6d~llots is approved
for the purpose:of building pefmit~issuance. I SsUance of building
' permits is still subject to all normal City requirements required
pursuant to the building permit process. t
Partial release of the site'is denied for'the following reasons:
3L
x PRO T INSPEQM DATE PROJECT ENGINEER DXTE
SENIOR INFvPOCTOR. -DATE
el
'00 FEE: $175.
RECEIPT.NO:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORK -PART I
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE APPLICANT)
CASE NO.
DATE:
Applicant: 5A NA -r~ S \d. H To W E_ W_
Address of Applicant- 0 B.0 >~ 739 V) L-A q7D 93
Phone Number: '721 1-7 -7 4
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (
i
f
o
t
h
e
r
than applicant):,
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Description of Project: 6jf?40usl!~~ PLAx-A E~10_ S11\JC=1 Lr_-- EA(\1hLV
Project Location/Address: -7/56 AJZC~7 0LJAUTA \AZA)~
Assessor Parcel Number: 2- j5 457o
Zone of Subject Prqperty:
Proposed Use of Site:- BUILD A S i N_ ca L iL,,/' DWFLLIN4
List all other applicable applications related.to this pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
5;iZADit,141 PE!Z 0A IT P E, .1, -96. 3 8
9
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following'questions by placing a check in the'appropriate space. (Discuss*all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessary.)
YES NO Could the project significantly change present
land -uses in the vicinity of the activity?
Could the activity affect the use of a recrea-
tional area, or area of important aesthetic
value?
Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood?
Could the activity result in the displacement of
community residents?
Could the activity increase the number of low and
modest cost housing units in.the city?
Could the activity d
-
ecrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city?
Are any of the natural or man-made features in the
activity area unique, that is, not found-in other
.parts of the country, state or nation?
Could the activity significantly affect an
historical, paleontological, or archaeological
site or its settings?
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
.0) Does the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of
a scarce natural resource?
.1) Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant'life.?
Are there any rare or endangered plant species
in the activity area?
Could the activity change existing.features of, any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands?
Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's-beaches?
Could the activity ,result in the erosion or elimination of agricultural lands?
-3-
Rev 7/88
YES NO
16) Could the activity-serve to encourage development
ot presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop-
of already developed areas?
17). Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water
noise, etc.)?
Will the activity requiro.certific'ation, authoriza-
tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? V
Will the activity require issuance of a variance . or conditional use permit by the City?
Will the activity involve th e application, use,. or disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain?
Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault?
23)_ Will the activity involve construction of
. I facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of noise?
Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of dust?
Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
Could the activity result in a significant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's air
or water -i:esources? '(Should note surface, ground
water, off-shore.)
-..128) Will the project substantially increase fuel , consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)?
29) will there be a significant change to existing
land form?
Indicate estimated grading to be done in
cubic yards: 1P,_;5P
Percentage of altera~lon to the present
land form:
Maximum height of cut or fill slopes:
101' tLL el C-U-r
11~
11~
V-1"
-4-
YES NO
Will the activity.result in substantial increases
in the use of utiliti,es, sewers, drains or
streets?
Is the activity carried but-as part of a larger -project or'series of projects?
STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you ,have answered yes to one or more of the questions in
Section I but you think the act.ivity will have,no signifi'-cant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below:.
-II. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed ,for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.)
;ignature Q4171~~
(Person pleting Report) I IVM
Date Signed 1? -3 9W
-5-
'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM,-- PART II
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE 90. PE 2.88.38
DATE: October 20,, 1988
I. BACKGROUND
1. APPLICANT: Dicarlo/Hi4htower~".
2.1" ADDRESS AND,PHONE I NUMBER.O APPLTCANT~;,,, ~P.~-O,.,"Box- 1738
Vista, CA' 92083
19) 7 2'1 -~-1774
DATE CHECKLIST SUBMITTED,:,,, October 6,11988
Ii. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative',- Ains,4ers.are to be written
under Section III Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAYBE NO
1.'Earth Will the proposal
have significant results in:,,
Unstable earth.conditions
or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
Disruptions.- displacement's
compaction or overcoviering
of the soil'? X
Change in,topography or ground
surface relief features7 X
The destruction,,covering,of
modification of,any unique
geologic or physical features. X
Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or
off the site? X
f . Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, orIchanges in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may,modify the channel or.a
river or,stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?,, X
YES MAYBE NO
2. Air Will the proposal.have
significant results in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
b., The creation,of objectionable
odors? X
c. Alteration of air movement'.
moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally? X
Water Will the'.proposal have -
significant results in:
changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters?. X
Changes,in absorption rates,
drainage patters,, or the rate and
,amount of surface water runoff? X
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters? X
Change in'the amount of surface
water in any water body?, X
Discharge,into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to, temperature,.dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? X
Alteration of the direction o r
rate of flow of ground waters? X
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an-aquifer by cuts
or excavations?- X
h., Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies? X
-2-
YES MAYBE NO
4. Plant Life - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any-species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,,'
crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants?
c.. Introduction of new species of plants
into an area, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life - Will~the,proposal have
significant results,ih:
a. Changes in the diversity'.of species
or numbers of any species~of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,,
insects or microfauna)?
bl. Reduction of the numbers of anyunique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result -in a barrier
to the.migration or movement~of
animals?
Deterioration to 'existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
6,. Noise - Will the proposal significantly
.increase existing noise levels?
Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig-
nificantly produce new light or glare?
Land Use - Will the proposal have
significant results in the alteration of
the present or planned land use of,an
area?
-3-
,X
X
X
X
X —
X
X -
YES MAYBE NO
9. Natural Resources Will the proposal
have significant results in:
~a. Increase in the rate 'of use of any
natural resources'~' X
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource? X
Risk of Upset - Does the"proposal
involve a significant risk of an.
explosion or the release of hazardous,
substances (including, but not limited,
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event,of'an accident
or upset conditions? X
'11. Population Will the proposal signif-
icantly alter the,location, distribu-
tion, density, or growth rate.of the,,.
human population of an area? X
Housing - Will the proposal signif-
icantly affect existing-housingi,,,,or
create ,a demand for additional housing? X
Transportation/Circulation -,Will'the,
proposal have significant results in:
a. Generation of additional vehicular
movement? X
b.. Effects on'existing parking/ facili-
ties, or demand for new parking? X
c. Impact upon existing transportation
systems?,' X
d.,Alterations to present patterns of,
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? X
Alterations to.-waterborne, rail l'or
air traffic? X
f.'Increase in traffic hazards-.t- 01
motor vehicles, bicyclists or'
pedestrians? X
YES MAYBE NO
14 Public Services Will the,proposal,have
a significant -effect uporif , or have sighif-',
icant resultsl in the need for new or
altered governmental 'services, in._,,,,alny of ,the following areas-
Fire protection? X
Police protection? X,
Schools? X
Parks or other recreational
facilities? X
of public facilitiest 'Maintenance
including .roads? X
Other governmental' services?- X
15. Energy -Vill the proposal have
significant results in:
.a. Use of substantial amounts,of fuel,
or energy? X
b.'Demand,upon existing sources of
energy, or require the development
of new sources of energ"> Y_ X
16. Utilities Will the proposal have
' signific
'
ant results in the need for new
systems, or alterations to the ,following
utilities:
Power or natural gas?-- X
Communications systems? X
Water*'~ X
d. Sewer or septic tanks? X
e . Storm water drainage? X
f . Solid waste and disposal? X
17. Human Health —Will the proposalhave
,significant results in the creation~of
any health hazard or potential health,
hazard (excluding mental health)?. X
-5-
YES. MAYBE NO
Aesthetics Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal result in
creation of an aesthetically,offensive
public view? x
19. Recreation - Will the proposal have
significant results in the impact upon,
the quality or quantity of,existing
recreational opportunities?. x
2 G. Archeolocfical/Historical/Paleontologica1
Will the proposal have significant
results in the alteration of a significant'
archeological, paleontological or
~historical sitel structure,~object or
building? x
21. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such a's:,
a) Phased development of the project,,b),alternate~site designs,
c) alternate scale of development, d)'alternate'uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter-
nate sites for the proposed, And g),no,project alternative.
a) N/A I Phased development'of projectis not necessary since-grading
only consists for one -single family dwelling unit.
b) Alternate site design is possible, but applicant has designed
project to have a minimal impact on-this site.
c) N/A. Scale of development is consistent with General Plan.
d) N/A. Proposed use is consistent with General Plan and Zoning
ordinance.
e),:Development at some future time would leave the lot vacant. The
proposed site is zoned for development of a single family
residence,and development At this time would be appropriate.
Grading was specifically designed for the proposed site. An
alternate site would require a change in grading.
A "no project" alternative would ,leave.the lot vacant.
76-
0
YES MAYBE NO
22. Mandatory findings of significance -
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, or curtail the diversity
ih,'~th4 environment? X
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term,, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term,limpact I on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) X
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A
project may impact on two or more
separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is
significant.) X
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,. -either directly or indirectly? X
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The proposed project consists of approximately 1,238 cubic yards of cut
and fill for the construction of a single family dwelling. The proposed
project is harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood and will not
have a significant impact on the environment.
The project is an infill project and'will not significantly affect any
plant or animal. life at.the site. Previous development in the area
would have already disturbed the habitat.
The project is in conformance with the General Plan and Zoning
designations for the site and will not significantly impact local
traffic or housing. All public facilities needed for the site are
available and have been accounted for in the local Facilities Management
Plan Zone 6.
-7-
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
In- -summary, it appears. that the proposed project will not have a
significant impact on the environment, and staff feels comfortable in
issuing,a.Negative'Declaration.
-J 4'A
IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
on the basis of this- initial evaluation:'
X I'find the proposed project COULD NOT have,a significant effect on
the environm6nt,,and a -INEGA, VE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have'a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the,mitigatibn measures described,on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional -Negative
Declaration will be propose ' d_-
I find the proposed project MAY have a I significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTREPORT is required.
10/20/88
Date Signature
*4 AAA00—
Date PlAnningDir6dtor
V.MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)