The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPE 2.88.39; BARTLEY SEAWALL; Engineering ApplicationApplication for Grading Permit CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Drive 438-3550 P,e,o~e~ -,2 7" -'RE NO. Z U DD 1 ''Building Permit Plan Check No. Validation by Finance Department 04/13/90 o0ol 01. 05 FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN ..Site Address Surety Comp Bond No. 9489 nr-~!An St . Carl sbad., CA ~201718 Z74 Legal Description Map No. Surety Address Lot 5 1782 t,//A Subdivision Name Date Filed Rec'd by Granville Park 1A Owne'Helen & Charles Bartley Phone Carlsbad Cash deposit Rec'd by Date filed ..729-6S44 Z,377,60' 110-r, "in /6 - 1 -3 -,?? _$ Owner's Address 6520 E. Exetex, Scottsdale,AZ 85251 The following documents are required and shall become a part 7FT, (602)C)46_45_98 of the grading permit when they are approved. Plans by Civil Engineer R.C.E. George P. Iourisbury #21291 — Grading plans — Specifications — Soil report — Geologic Report Address Phone 1530 N. Elm, Escondido 743-6282- — Drainage structures — Other Compaction report Soil Engineer R.C.E. Phone Mark Hetherington #397 931-1917 Grading Contractor Phone' SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE A PART OF THIS PERMIT Address 1 . Authorized hours of operation: 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday. 'Party responsible for overall supervision Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. Oaarles Bartley or Keith Bartlg~y Yroposed use of grade site &yE%,,1rff ion has p~etajn Walj,T0 pre mmed) Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation osi Number of cubic yards control. Cut Fill Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per City Code. 58 T96 38 -0- Proposed Schedule of i. ediately Start Finish 5.1 All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum Operations (dates) after per . mi t S - density unless noted otherwise. I hereby acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading, and the provisions and conditions o any permit issued pursuant to Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: 0 REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections this application. listed below. 0 CONTROLLED GRADING - Private grading engineer shall Signature of Permittee observe work, coordinate tests, make reports. Owner or authorized agent INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE Initial - site prep. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - Rough - prior to drains Date 810 V EIA Log No.ioE. Z -'Ob .3 9 B ~ I- - y ,wc Final - slopes planted Grading permit fee $ Plan check fee $2 6 Compaction reports rec'd. Permit 17pd Private engr. cert. rec'd. - y ____ / — _- -1 - - OC Copies: White-Office; Green-Building; '~'~odi and-e' Per ~~(x piration Date Yellow-Inspector; Pink-Permittee; Goldenr THIS FO.RM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED IS APERMIT-TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD CITY. OF CARLSBAD' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND QEPQ5IIS WORKSHEET PREPARED BY: L PROJECT NAME: L-lj A LWL- DATE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FEE . . . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . ~j M A P FEE LOTSX PARCEL MAP/FINAL MAP NO. OF LOTS /v /A (EXPEDITED/NOT EXPEDITED) PARCEL MAP EXTENSION FEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ta IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK FEE: DEPOSIT WITH SUBMITTAL RECEIPT,NO. IMPROVEMENT DiSCItIPTION BONDED VALUE TOTAL: IMPROVEMENT*INSPECTION.FEE: ITEM TOTAL: PARK -IN-LIEU FEE (CIRCLE ONE): DWELLING TYPE: SF OR DUPLEX AREA: 1 - 2 3 4 NUMBER OF UNITS: STREET.LIGHT ENERGIZING: X - J, FERCENTAGE VALUE x /A PERCENTAGE MF (<4 UNITS) MF (? 4 UNITS) MH X AJ A AREA FEE/UNIT 5,800 LUMEN AT 81.00 = 9,500 LUMEN AT 111.06 = 16,000 LUMEN AT 152.10 = 20,000 LUMEN AT 169.38 = /4 TOTAL: ~j GRADING PLAN, FHECK FEE DEPOSIT 27 f 5 RECEIPT NO. PEDITEDI/NOT EXPEDITED) GRADING .PLAN CHECK FEE CUBIC YARDS), . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (9-7-7 GRADING CASH DEPOS IT . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . DUPLICATE.TRACING FEE . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . STREET SIGN DEPOSIT: AT AT AT 1A TOTAL: STREETSTRIPING DEPOSIT . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . /\j A FRONT LINE OR AREA FEES (TYPE ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . A/ 1A DRAINAGE AREA FEE (AREA NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . AJ /A TOTAL ACRES: X AREA FEE -LESS I)RAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AS NOTED IN m^bIER DRAINAGE PLAN DOCUMENTS MULTIPLIED BY CURRENT INFLATION FACTOR... LINE VALUE. X FACTQR AMOUNT X X X TOTAL: DRAINAGE FEE DUE: tj LA ADDITIONAL FEES: TYPE . . . . . . . . . ... . . . ... . TY P E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ej TOTAL FEES AND DEPOS ITS: (IN ADDITION, A GRADING PERMIT FEE OF $2-5 IS DUE UPON ISSUANCE OF THE GRADING PERMIT.) APPLIC&ON FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPENDIX..B LOCAL AGENCY REV-IEW FORM' 1SECTION A (To be completed by. appl'ica.ng Appl i cant ao/zi.F6 f. 44g-r4gf— POoz7~vea =,oda Yr, -Project description IMPROVEMMT OF MAJNMG WALL CN BEACH PROPERTY—"BAW—LEY SEATRAM-11 Location 2489 OCEAN sT.-,,cARLsBAD, CA 92008. Assessor's,Parcel Number'. 203-021-09 ISECTION B (To be, completed by 1 ocal pl anni ng or ~ui 1 di ng i.nspection departmenill Zoning designation du/ac General or Community Plan designation, RrY~J~ du/ac Local Discretionary Approvals' 0 Proposed development meets all zoning 'requi,r6ments and needs' no.local permits. other than-building permits. Proposed development needs local discretionary approvals noted below. Needed Receive 0 0 D6sign/Architectural review 0 0 Variance for .,0 0 Rezone from 0 'Tentative Subdivision/Parcel Map No.. Land Development Permit No.PE. Planned Residential/Commercial Development Site Plan Review 0 Condominium Conversion Permit 0 0 Conditional, Speciai,.or Major Use Permit No,, -0. 0 Other CEQA Status El Categori cal ly Exempt Class Item Negative Declaration'Granted NOV, F]-.Environmenta'l Impact-Report Requi'red,. Final Report certified Prepared for the City/Geuaty of Cq,--1s,&qd -v Date DE<_' q--L 75B T i t 1 e 1,44,1 e-CA4 ~C;AtJ M,~l State Clearinghouse, 1400 Tenth Street,.Rm. 121, Sacramento, CA 9584P!- 916/445-0613 IF NOTICE OF COMPLETION ANDtENVIRONMENTAL,.DOCUMENT FORK See NOTE Below: SCH # Project Title Seawall for Bartley Residence Lead Agency: City of CarLsbadt 3.--'Contact person: Eric Munoz 3a. Street Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr. 3b..City-, Carlsbad [It 3c. County: San Diego 3d. Zip: 92009 3e. Phone: (619) 438-1161 PROJECT LOCATION 4. County: 'San Diego 4a. City/Community: Carlsbad 4b.(optionat) Assessor's-Parcel No. 20302109 4c. Section: Twp. ___ Range For Rural, 5a. Cross Streets: Ocean St./Pacific Ave. — 5b. Nearest Community: Carlsbad 6. Within 2 miles of: a. State Hwy No. 1-5 b. Airports -N/A c. Waterways Pacific Ocean -7. DOCUMENT TYPE CEQA 01 NOP 02 _ Early Cons 03 X Neg Dec 04 Draft EIR 05 Supplement/ Subsequent EIR (if so, prior SCH # NEPA 06 Notice of Intent 07 Envir. Assessment/ FONSI 8. LOCAL ACTION TYPE 10. DEVELOPMENT TYPE 01 — General Plan Update 01 Residential: Units Acres 02 — New Element 02 Office: Sq. Ft. 03 — General Plan Amendment Acres — Employees 04 — Master Plan , 03 Shopping/CommerciaL: Sq.Ft. 05 — Annexation *Acres Employees 06 _ Specific Plan 04 Industrial: Sq. Ft. 07 Redevelopment Acres Employees 08 Rezone 05 Sewer: MGD 09 Land Division 06 Water:_MGD (Subdivision, Parcel Map. Tract Map, etc.) 07 Transportation: Type 10 Use Permit 08 Mineral Extraction: Mineral 08 — Draft EIS 11 — Cancel Ag Preserve OTHER 12 X Other Grading 09 information Only '10 Final Document 9 TOTAL ACRES: 11 Other: 11. PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT 09 — Power Generation: Wattage Type: 10 X -Other: Seawall Construction 01 — Aesthetic/Visual 08 — Geologic/Seismic 15 — Sewer Capacity 22 _ Water Supply 02 — Agricultural Land 09 — Jobs/Housing Balance 16 — Soil Erosion 23 — WetLand/Riparian 03 — Air Quality 10 Minerals 17 Solid Waste 24 Wildlife 04 — ArchaeoLogicat/Historical/ 11 — Noise 18 — Toxic/Hazardous 25 Growth Inducing Paleontological 12 — Public Services 19 — Traffic/CircuLation 26 Incompatible Landuse 05 X Coastal 13 — Schools 20 Vegetation 27 Cumulative Effects 06 — Fire Hazard 14 _ Septic Systems 21 Water Quality 28 Other 07 — FLooding/Drainage 12 FUNDING (approx.) Federal $ State $ Total $ 13 PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING: R-3 zoning/RMH General Plan designation 14 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of a 10 , high seawall on private-property to.protect residence of Charles Bartley. 15..SIGNATURE OF LEAD AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: Date: 11/15/88 NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects If a SCH Number already exists for a I project (e.g. from a Notice of Preparation or previous draft document) please fill it in. I I REVIEWING AK;ENCIES Resources Agency =A (CalTRPA) Air Resources Board TRPA (Tahoe RPA) Conservation Bay Conservation &IDevIt Com Fish arid Game Parks and Recreation. Coastal Coimnission Office-of Historic Preservation Caltrans District Native American Heritage Ccmm Caltrans - Planning State lands Carmn Caltrans - Aeronautics Public Utilities Carmn California Highway Patrol Eh _I:w -amm. Boating and Waterways Food and Agriculture Forestry Health Seridoes State Water Resoruces Control Statewide,Health Planning (hospitals) Board - Headquarters Housing and Community DevIt _Regional Water Quality Control C6rre~~ioris- Board, Region General Services Division of Water Rights (SWRCB) Office of local Assistance Division of Water Quality (SWRCB) Public Works Board Department of Water Resources Office of Appropriate'Tech. (OPR) Reclamation Board local Gaverrment Unit (OPR)' Solid Waste Management Board Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Colorado River Board Other FOR SCH USE ONLY Date Received at SCH Catalog Number Date Review Starts Proponent Date to Agencies Consultant Date to SCH Contact Phone Clearance Date Address Notes: FEE: $175~00 R/ 179 RECEIPT..NO: ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM.-^.PART I, (TO BE COMPETED BY THE APPLICANT) CASE NO. DATE: 0_= ju /3.4 f2- 7- Applicant: Or- 3-11pr /_0 C-,4 7- AO A',l T 4W q /A Address' of Applicant: etc 2_11c4we &qIzv Phone Number: Name,,address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other t h a n , a p p 1 i c a n t) 17-1-1 17/7p- rz -- #7 6~~ 4 5 134 P 44046?55 4',P1,eWe ;f1d, GENERAL INFORMATION: .De . scription of Project: 97-AlAIIAIC7 "L4 '510'e- Or LOC,4-rl,94, 7D R4,gl~~-Illr Project Location/Address: e~3n~xv Yr .Assessor Parcel'Number: 20-6-02-1 _0~ Zone of Subject Property: 7P, Proposed Use -of Site: AJ7 List all other applicable applications related ,to this roject: p ILVIA 1 1% Describe the act ' ivity.area,, including distinguishing natural and man-made~characteristics;.alslo provide precise slope analysis when t approprda e.... Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. rT -r If residential, include' the number of units f schedule'of unit-sizes t range of'sale prices or,rents, and .type of household size expected.. 5. If commercial,. indicate the,type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally ,oriented, s'qua're 'footage of sales area, and loading facilities.. If industrial, indicate type, estimated -employment per shift, and loading fa.dilities.1: .7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employ- ment, per shift,.e,stimated occupancy, loading facilities, and .community benefits.to be'derived from the project. -2- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS a t Answer-the following*questions by placing a check in ''~he:-'-appro-p---r- i. space. .:(Discuss 'all' items checked "yes".. Attach additio'n'al sheets' as necessary.). YES NO Co I uld the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? could the activity affect the use of a recrea.- tional area, or area of important aesthetic value? Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? Could the activity result in the displacement of residents? communi Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? . Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the country, state or nation? Could the activity significantly affect an historical, paleontological, or archaeological site or-its settings? 9j Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a , scarce natural resource? Does the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's-beaches? Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination of agricultural lands? -3 - Rev 7/88 I Ll_~' YES NO- Could the activity.ser-,~e to encourage.development of presently -undeveloped areas -1ntensiiy,1-..'deVe1op--ment of already developed areas? will the activity require a variance from CITY established environmental standards (air, water noise, etc-.)? 7",~k 1_. 6m Will the activity require certifiq'ation,.authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or.. federal environmental control agency? Will the activity require issuance of.-a variance or conditional use permit by the City?. Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? 2 2) Will the activity involve-construction of facilities~ in the area of an active fault? Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? Could the activity result in the ' generation of, significant amounts of noise?. Could the ' activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? V Could the activity result in.a. * signif ' icant change ..in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water i~esources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? Will there be a significant change to existing land form? Nc> Indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards: &P.ZKi -fo IA,),T,9A, JrS- R&TA1,41 WP04- 41A-LL, Percentage of -EI`teration to.the present'. land form:— Maximum height, of cut or fill slopes: ~71 L L-- -4- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM PARVII (TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. P.E. 2.88.39, DATE: November 8. 1988 BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Charles and Helen Bartley 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 6520 E. Exeter Blvd. Scottsdale, ~AZ 85251 (619)729-5644/(602) 946-4558 3.' DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: October 12, 1988 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all—Affirmative Answers are to,be written biscu ssioft of'E under Section III nvironmental,Evalu'ation) ~YES MAYBE' NO 1. Earth Will the proposal, have significant results in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X Disruptions, displacements,- compaction or overcoverinq of the soil? X Change-in topography or ground surface relief features?. X The destruction, covering of modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either,on or,7 off the site? X Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of.the ocean,or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES MAYBE NO 2. Air Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b.. The creation of objectionable odors? X Alteration of-air~movement moisture or temperature, or any change in-c1limate, either:-,locally or regionally?, X 3.- Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: changes in currents', or'~the Course or direction of water movements, in either marine,or fresih~waters? X 'Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, ~or the.rate and amount of surface water runoff? X Alterations to the cour'se'or-flow of floodwaters? X Change in the'amount of surface 'water in any water body? X e. Discharge 'into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface , water quality ' including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f.'Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g.~ Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X -2- YES MAYBE NO 4. 'Plant Life Will'the proposal have significant results in; Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants, ' (including trees, shrubs, grassf crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X , Reduction of the numbers of any, unique, rare or,endangered species of plants? X Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X Reduction in acreage of any agricultural ,crop? X 5. Animal Life Will the proposal have signi 1 ificant results in:, Changes in the diversity of speciesi or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles! fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, -insects or microfauna)? X Reduction of the numbers of any uniquef rare or endangered species of animals? Introduction of new species of -animals into an area, or result in a barrier to,the migration or movement of' animals? X Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig- n ificantly produce.new light or glare? 8. Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of ,the present or planned land use of an~ area?, X -3- YES MAYBE NO Natural Resources Will the proposal have significant results in': a.. Increase in the rate of use'o f any", natural resources.? X b., 'Depletion',of any -nonrenewable natural resource?.' X Risk-of Uvset -'Does the proposal involve a significant,risk,of an explosion or the' release of hazairdous—'_ substances (including, but not limited , toi oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation); in the event of an-'accident or upset conditions-? X Population Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location,,distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the, human population of an area? X_ Housinq - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing,' or 'create a demand for additional'housing?.' X Transportation/Circulation Will the proposal have significantresults in: Generation of additional vehicular movement? _X Effects~on existing parking facili- ties, ordemand for new parking? X Impact upon existing transportation systems? X Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people. and/or goods? X Alterations to waterblorne, rail or -- air traffic? X f., Increase in traffic hazards,to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X -4- 14. Public Ser-~rices'-Will.the ,proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results.in the need,for new~or-_ altered governmental,services in any of - the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Other governmental services? 15. Energy - Will the proposal have significant results in: Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or-alterations to the following utilities: Power or natural gas? Communications systems? Water? :d. Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have .significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health - hazard (excluding mental health)? 0 YES MAYBE NO X X X X X X X _X X X X X X X X _5" YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics— Will the proposal have' significant results -iii the obstruction of any scenic,v'l ista -or view"open to the, public, or~will-th.6 proposal result -iin creation of,an aesthetically offensive public view? X Recreation Will the proposal have significant results in the,impact upon -the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X 20. Archeological/Historical/Paleontological Will,the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure,,, object or building?. X 21,. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as: a)'Phased development-of the project,.b)lalternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d),:alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a) Dueto the small scale of the proposed seawall,, phasing is not necessary; it should be constructed without a phasing schedule. Alternate site designs are ' not necessary since t ' he proposed seawall will follow site specific geotechnical ' recommendations regarding the seawall construction and location. c) The scale of development is compatible, with adjacent shoreline protection structures,and is sufficient to withstand moderate to severe storm,waves. d & e) There are.no real alternate uses for the site. Presently it is exposed to,extreme ocean forces, and will undergo,further erosion if, a shoreline protection structure is- developed at some,future time. N/A A no project alternative, will leave the site vulnerable to damaging storm waves. YES MAYBE NO 22. Mandatory findings of significance a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? X b-.-Does the project have the potential , to achieve shor~~-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental' goals? .(A short-;~term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief'o~~definitiv6',Period~~o,f time while long"teirm impacts'wi-il endure well, into the future~) X Does the,project~have impacts which are individually limited,, but, cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on,two or,1 more separate resources wherd the-impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the efivironmeritis significant.) X Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Earth The proposed residential seawall will not adversely affect any existing geologic, topographic or soil features of the site. In acting as a solid barrier between . storm waves and the subject property, the seawall may prevent some onshore sand movement and deposition. The scale of this sand movement alteration is 'small and is in no way threatening to the local beach sand supply. Air: N/A DISCUSSION -OF-ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) Water The proposed seawall will nlotl affect the quantity or quality of surface or ground water in the area. Extreme wave wash run up onto the site will be ,lessened by the shoreline protection structure. The wave energy will be redirected and reflected to protect the site. No signif icant adverse impacts will result from' the intended,functions of the seawall relating to the water environment. Plant Life: N/A Animal Life: N/A Noise: N/A Light and Glare: N/A Land Use' Similar sites on adjacent properties are used for'the locations of shoreline protection structures. The 1 d.~seawall, at this,site is, compatible with ?roRose surrounding land uses. Natural Resources: N/A Risk of Upset: N/A Pop lation: N/A Housing: N/A Transportation/Circulation:. N/A Public Services: N/A Energy: N/A Utilities: N/A Human Health: N/A Aesthetics: N/A Recreation: N/A DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) Archeological/Historical: V/A' In conclusion, the propos ' ed seawall-is appropriate and necessary to protect the subject propert~yl froxi, fur~h6r, erosion' and bluff recession due to episodic storm waves. The seawall would be on private property, out of the public right-of-way, and would be compatible in size and scale to adjacent shoreline protection structurie~s. ..!The proposed seawall would eliminate a gap in the existing, otherwise uniform line of shore *protection structures. The applicant has complied with Local Coastal 'Program policy by submitting a detailed geotechnical - report focusing on design and location recommendations for an appropriate seawall atthe subject site. This project will have no adverse environmental impacts and staff is confident in issuing a Negative Declaration. IV.- DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) on the basis of this initial.evaluation: x I find the proposed project COULD NOT'have a significant effect on, the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 'I find that although'the proposed project could have a significant m - -~"th " -be a significant effect in effect on the enviroh'entj~ ere ' 'will riot this case because-'thelmitigation measures desciibed on-an attached sheet have been added to the project~. A Conditional Negative Declaration, wil"I be proposed., project,.MAY have~'a signifidant,effect on the environment,,,and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is-required, -November,8. 1988 O.X, Date signature 11 _C6t3 V Date Planni bir&2_6tor V. MITIGATING MEASURES,-(If Applicable), MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) 0 In VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE-ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND .CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature