Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.88.41; KHADEM RESIDENCE; Engineering Application -Application for'Grading Permit CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Drive 438-3550 e PE NO. 2,86 q I VW(A 711 Building Permit-Plan Check No; Validation by Finance Department 2219 05/30/89 0001 01 05 - Mic;r 125-00 FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN Site Address Surety-Company Bond No. r-06afG grjZ67U=j AmegichJ A60TOR61- IM5. C-0, 3- SM-717- Legal Description Map No. Surety Address 659- 00 [Date LO 71. 85 0 2- LokK (5cove 1 U 4000 Subdivision Name 11 Filed Rec'd by LA Lv~ eK-rA-re AAga-TL4 -n, 903 41, &ait-5 Owner Phone Cash deposif Rec'd by Date filed taAA 164 AD LCM 144~ —141 r $ 173o.00 gcpr-* 9(,43Y M-Oaaks a mav 07 Owner's Address The following documents are required and shall become a i7art 4jaX 4 8114 204 4),4r., ~5Ava ZiG6o cA of the grading permit when they are approved. Plans by.Civil Engineer R.C.E.' X Grading plans Specifications X *Soil report Geologic Report Address -Phone 9F9 If 14 /4 Is-r/01i CT T40 la, 09 . _R~ - 4f f1i I Drainage structures Other Compaction report Soil Engineer R.C.E. Phone Grading Contractor Phone SPECIAL CONDITIONS WHICH ARE MADE KSVIN - -I F,991 CON25r. 4SI-1563 A PART OF THIS PERMIT Address 357 3 W. 50 MM05, 130 0 54~j Wero Authorized hours'of operation: Party responsible for overall supervision 7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday. K I- V i-Ai TERKY Proposed use of grade site Haul routes are to be approved by City Engineer. : %J ( - - 5 -7L6 Number of cubic yards Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation co6trol. Cut Fill Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per City Code. 6io Proposed Schedule of Start Finish Operations AV6 All fills to be compacted to at least 90% of optimum (dates) M,4y By ;09VOW density unless noted otherwise. I heret~y acknowledge that I have read the application and state that the information I have provided is correct and agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws r4gulating excavating and grading, and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued pursuant to Under City Code Sec. 11.06 170 this grading is: 0 REGULAR GRADING - City inspector will make inspections this application: listed below. ~RrCONTROLLED.GRADING - Private grading ~ngineer shall Signature of Permittee work, coordihate tests, make reports. Owner or authorized agent INSPECTION DATE INSP. SIGNATURE Initial - site prep. 6-,6-81 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE - Date Rough - prior to drai 9~ EIA Log No. 6:.. Z. %S Lo By Fi nal - slopes planted 1/-2- ?Vr 0 Grading, permit fee $ Plan 9,eck fe6j.,,_35 lo— go - r -a Compaction reports rec d. Permit Issued r rert rec'd by D t Copies~ White-Office; Green-Building; M Permit Expiration Date 4AX '"1024- - A Yellow-inspector; Pink-Permilgee; Gold inance Z-4A~1- Z A/4!;' FO.RMWt!p PROPERLY THIS VALIDATE(5 ISAPERMITTO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED57;ee 4 -2Z4--7S_1P0-4-P /'Ov-' —4;"'r T H I S P E R M I T I S V A L I D F 0 R A S 1 6) M WMR IOD Z_ FEE $175.00 RECEIPT NO: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To Be Completed by,APPLICANT) CASE NO: DATE: Applicant: 14 A-AIL 641 Address of Applicant: JJ 0 A-+ p1 J-2.0&J k~p(. 'rnm(an .,CAI Phone Number: Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if'other than Appli.can.t) Omz---nij zomov42or->i- /)96+'A M I -S C ( v K L ONOTEM CT. GENERAL INFORMATIM , .Description of Project: tikka C4"[)JhV4 Isoa S), 16 Lj~ ~:y ZC-Siornoin AL- PAn Proj.ect Location/Address- S 'T C- L- F Assessor Parcel Number: 4172 IS Zone of Subject Pro . per . ty: PC .Proposed Use of Site: .-:5, ri r4 ag: aw-Li aysu0E&rTzAi- List all otherapplicable applications related'to,this project: J6 PfA A T, F-61,Q(4 126-12011, i-u!~I*Dc- D6VC-Lo 2G" I T I Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and m a n - ' made characterilstics;. also.provide-preci,,Se slope analysis when appropriate. t9DT'l A-L - D . escribe energy conservation measures-incorporated'into ,the.design and/or operation of,- the project. If residential,,Jnclude the number of units,, schedule*of unit sizes,' range of sale prices or rents,.4nd type of-hbusehold *s.ize expected., oWA) i9e oOt jCD ..5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether-nOighborhood, city or area, and loading region_al,ly,oriented,-~.quare footage of sales facilities. If industrial, indicate*type, estimated employment per shift ! and loading facili'ties-. If institut*ional, indicate. the m-ajor fuhction"!estimated2employment per shift, estimated occupancy! loading -faci..lities, and co.mmuhity benefits to be derived f'rom the project., I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS. Answer the following questions by placing a check in the Appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as: necessary..) YES NO 11) Could the-project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? Could'the activity affect the use-of a.recreational area, or area ,of important aesthetic value? -Could.-the activity affect the function ing of an established community or.ne.ighborhood? Could the activity result 'in the displacement of community residents?- 5i Could the activity increase the number of low and'' modest cost housing units in the city? 6) Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest Post housing units in the city?, .1 7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in,the activity area unique, that is, not.found-in other parts of the county, state or nation?. -8) Could the activity significantly affect an hist'orical or archaeological site or its settings? Could the activity si~jnificantly affect the' potential*use, extraction., or conservation'of a scarce natural resource? 1Z Does the activity significantly affect.the potential',use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural ~esource? Could, the activity'-significantly~affect-fish,.' wildlife.or'plant life? Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area? Could the activity change existing features of any of thecity's"lagoons, bays, or t.idelands? 14Y Could the'-activi'ty-change existing features 6f any of the city's beaches? 'Could the activity resul't in the erosion or elimination of agricultural lands? Could the'activity.sery ' e'to encourage development of pre~ently,undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of Already developed areas? -3- YES NO Will the a ' ctivity.require a variance from established environmental standards.(air, water,- noise, etc.)? will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any.local, state -or federal.environmental control agency? 19). Will the activity require issuande of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? 20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of pot'ent-ially haiz'ardo.us materials? 21') Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a-flood plain? 2Z) Will the activity involve construction of .facilities in the area of an.active fault? Will the activity involve cons'truction of facilities on a slope of"25 percent or greater5. Could the activity* result in- the generation of significant amounts'of noise? Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? Will the,activity involve the burning o,f.brush,,'. trees, or other materials? Could the activity result in a'significant change in the quality:of any portion of'the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) .28) Will the,project substantially increase-fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.-)? Will there be a significant ,change to existing land form? (a) Indicate estimated grading to.be done.in cubic yards: 60T (.S571 RLL_ (.8-0 (b)-. Percentage of altetation to the present land form:. (c). Maximum height of cut or fill slopes: Will the activity result in substantial'increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets?. 'Is the activity carried out ' as part of a larger project or series of projects'~ F, 'STATEMENT OF.NON-SIGNIFICANT.ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS- If you have answerea yes to one or more,of the question s i n S e c t i o n I but you think the activity will-,.have no-significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons,below: COMMENTS OR'ELABORATIONS TO ANY 00 THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (if additional, spade is needed for' answ~ring any ques,tions, attach additional sh eets as needdd.). Signature. (Person Completing Report). Date Signed ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT-FORK PART 11. (TO-BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. P.E. 2.88.41/HDP 88-18 DATE: January 5_1989 BACKGROUND APPLICANT: jiOSSEIN ZOMORRODI 2. ADDRESS AND PAONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: (619Y 295 -4442 7§84 11H11 Mission Center Court -San Diego, CA 92108 3-. DATE CHECX LIST SUBMITTED: December 2,,1988 II.- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section III Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth Will the proposal have significant results in: Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X Disruption s, displacements, ' compaction or overcovering of ' the soil? X C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X The destruction, covering of modification of Any unique geologic or physical features? Any increase in wind or.water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f Changes in.deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltatilon, deposition or erosion',.. which may modify.the channel or a river'or stream or the bed'of the ocean or.any )Say, inlet or lake?*- X YES MAYBE NO 2. Air Will the proposal have significant results in: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air',quality? X, The creation of objectionable odors? X C. Alteration*of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally' or regionally? X 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: ,a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements', .in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates,, drainage patters., or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X- Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X Change in the amount of surface. water in any water body? —X Discharg'e.into surface waters, or in any alteration of-surface water quality, including but not limited,to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground.waters? X Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer, by cuts or excavations? X Reduction in the amount of water , otherwise available for public. water supplies? X -2- YES MAYBE NO 4. Plant Life Will the proposal have significant results in: Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of,a ny species.of plants ' (including trees t shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X Reduction of the,numbers of any unique,'rare or endangered species of plants? X Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?' X Reduction in.acreage of'any agricultural crop? X—' 5. Animal Life - Will the-proposal have significant'results in: -a. 'Changes .in the diversity of species, or numbers o ' f any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish -and shellfish, benthic..organisms, insects or microfauna)? X Reduction of the numbers.of any unique, tare or .endangered species of animals? X Introduction of new species of animals ..into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise -:- Will the proposal significantly~. increase existing noise 1-evels? X 7. Light and Glare - Willthe proposal sig- nificantly produce newlight or glare? X 8., Land Use - Will'the proposal have , significant results inthe alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X -3- YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources Willthe proposal have.significant results in: Increase in the rateof use of any natural resources? X Depletion of,any nonrenewable natural-resource? X 10. Risk-of Upset Does the proposal invo,lve -a significant risk of'an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,. but not,limited to, oil,- pesticides,,chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident .or.upset conditions> X 11.. Povulatio_n~ - Will the.proposal..S~ignif- icantly-alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate,of the human.population of.an,area? X Housing Will the proposal signif— icantly affect existing housing, or .create-'a demand 'for additional,l ho-using? X Transoortation/Circuiation Will -the proposal have significant results in: Generation of additional vehicular movement. X Effects on existing.parking facili_. ties, or demand for new parking? X Impact upon existing transportation systems? X Alterations to present ,patterns of circulation or movement of people' and/or goods? X Alterations to *waterborne,.rail or ..air' traf f ic>' X f.- Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyqlistP or pedestrians? X -4- x x x 0 MAYBE NO YES el 14.~ Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon,'or have signif- icant results inthe need for new or' altered governmentall services in any of. the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? c.. Schools? Parks or other recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, Other governmental services? 15. Energy ' Wi 11 the proposal have significant results in:- Use of substantial amounts of fuel ,or energy? Demand upon'existing- sources of: energy, or require the development of new sources of,energy? 16. Utilities - Will the*proposal have significant results in the need ,fdr,ne,.V systems,, or alterations to the following utilities: a.-Power or -natural gas? b.-Communicati6ns systems? C. Water? Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? solid waste-and disposal?. 17. Human Health - Will the proposal halve .significant results in the.creation of' any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding.mental health)? -5- x x x x 18.. Aesthetics -.Will the proposal have - significant results in the obstruction. of any scenic vista or view open to the~ public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aestheticallyoffensive public view? X 19. Recreation - Will the'proposal have' significant results in the.impact upon the,quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? .20. Archeological/Historical/Paleontologica1 Will the proposal have significant results in th ' e alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or building? X 21. Analyze viable'alternatives to the*proposed Project such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. N/A. Phased development of,project is not necessary since grading .-is only for one single family dwelling unit. Alternate site design is possible, but applicant has designed p r o j e c t to have a minimal impact on this.site. N/A. Scale of development is consistent with General Plan. N/A. Proposed use is consistent with General Plan and Zoning ordinance. Development at some future time would leave the lot vacant. The proposed site is . zoned for development of a single family residence, and development at this time would be appropriate. F.- Grading was specifically designed for the. proposed sit e . An alternate site would require a -change in grading. G. A "no project" alternative would-leave the lot vacant. 0 22. Mandatory findings of signifi cance Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of'the environment, or curtail -the diversity in the environment?. Does the project have the,potential to ac ' hieve short--~term, to the,dis7 advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is*one which occurs in a relatively brief, ' definitive period of time while-long-term impacts will endure well into the future.). Does the project have impacts'which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?,- A' project may impact*on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) Does the-project have envir6nmentall, effects which will cause.substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION III. X X EARTH .The proposed grading for the single.family residence will not alter or disrupt any existing geologic features, or' soil conditions. Grading' of the. half acre site, as proposed,,will not-adversely impact the area. .AIR N/A WATER N/A PLANT LIFE AND ANIKA'L LIFE Any sensitive or endangered plants,or animals in the area.would have already been identified in the subdivision,process which created the subject lot. The general area consists of several custom lots which are being developed over time. While the site is covered with typical low lying ,shrubs and vegetation, development of the lot f or. -a single f amily residence wi'll. not adversely impact -any plant or animal life. -7- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATI0N,,..(C0NTINUEQ): NOISE N/A, LIGHT AND GLARE N/A LAND USE Th . e proj-ect site has A General'Plan-aesig"nation 'of Residential Low Density. The proposed proj ect is consistent with the current' land use designation and compatible with adjacent residences. NATURAL-RESOURCES N/A RISK OF UPSET N/A POPULATION HOUSING N/A TRANSPOATATI'ON/CIRCULATION .The project site is 'located off .*of El. Fuerte~Stre6t, an. existing circulation element public street sei!ving* the gei~e'ral area. 'The proposed single fami l y residence 'Will. not adversely'impact,any transportation or,circulation aspects...- PUBLIC SERVICES.A_ND UTILITIES The project is located in Local Facilitie's Management Zon~eji 6.~ The proposed residence will.'not adversely impact any fAcilities-requirem6nts as outlined by the Local Facilities Management PlanforZone 6., HUMAN HEALTH N/A AESTHETICS N/A RECREATION 7 N/A ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICALZPALEONTOLOGICAL' -N/A The proposed ,project involves grading a .56,.acre lot. to accommodate a 'single family residence on El Fuerte Street in Local Facilities Management'Zone 6. The project has undergone Hillside Development'review (HDP 88-18) and has no major. problems. In.conclusion, it is determined. that 'no significant environmental impacts will xesult, from this project,. Staff will. p . repare a, -Negative Declaration. IV'. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The,Pl.anning Department) on the basis of.this initial evaluation: x I find the proposed project COULD NOT have azignificant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could, have'a significan t effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effectin this case because.the mitigation measures described on-an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional-Negative Declaration will -be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, And an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. DAte Signature -D a-e Planning birector V. MITIGATING MEASURES. (If Applicable)