HomeMy WebLinkAboutPE 2.89.12; DONAHOE RESIDENCE; Engineering ApplicationApplication for Grading Permit
CITY OF.CARL.SBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
2075 Las Palmas Drive
'438-3550 Validation by Finance
Department
PE.NO.,
14
Building Permit Plan Chec k No.
FOR APPLICANT TO,FILL IN
Site Address 3876.Althea Lane Carl,sbad, CA
Surety Company Bond -No.
Legal Description Map No.
APN — 2 0 7— 12 0'— 6 4
Surety Address
Subdivision Name* Date Filed Recd by. -
Owner Phone
Kenneth & Cathy DeDn.ahoe .43.4 6706
Cash deposit Recd by Date, f 1 led
Owner's.Address
3 9 6,9 P a rlc Dr., Car.l,sbad, CA 92008
The following documents are required,and shall,be6ome a part
of the grading permit when they are approved.
Grading plans Specifications
Soil report ~Geologic Report
Drainage structures -Other
Compaction report
Pg&rHby)qigi4t~~'8erE~n-~,~in,erring. R.C.E.
Address Phone
4407 Manchester Encintas
Soil Engineer R~C.E. Phone
Grading Contractor Phone SPECIAL'CONDITIONS WHICH AR'"EMADE.
A PART OF THIS~PERMff
Address Authorized hours.of operation'
7:00 AM to Sunset, Monday - Friday;
Party responsible: for overall supervision
Haul routes are to be approved~ byCity Engineer.
Proposed Use of. grade site
Adequate provisions shall be made for erosion and siltation
control. Number of cubic yards
Cut Fill Import Waste All slopes shall be planted per City Code.
31 ()'-] Z6 n 7F j
'least 90% Al I f i I Is to be corripacted fd at of optimum
density unless noted otherwise.
Proposed Schedule of Start Finish
Operations (dates)
I hereby acknowledge that I have, read the application -and. state that
the informati on 1have. provided is correct,and agree to comply with
all.City ordinances and State laws regulating excavating and grading,
and the provisions and conditions of any permit issued, pursuant to
this application.
Signature of Permittee
Owner or authorized agent
140 th'is grading I Under-City Code, Sec. 11.06 S.
0 REGULAR GRADING- City Inspector_wjII make. inspections
listed below.
0 CONTROLLED GRADING grading engineer shall
observe work, coordinate tests, mak6.'reportt...
INSPECTION DATE INSP. 81ONATURE
Initial - site-prep..
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE;-
Date
EIA Log.No.
By
Rough - prior to drains,
Final - slopes planted
Compaction reports rec'd.
Grading permit fee $ Plan check fee $ 3's
Private engr. cert. rec'd. Permit Issued
by Uate. Copies- White-Off ice--. Green-Buildin-
Permit Expiration Date Yellow-Inspedtor; Pink-,Permittee; Goldenrod~Fiqance
THIS FO.RMWHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED ISA.PERMITTO DOTHEWORK DESCRIBED-
THIS,PERMIT IS~VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH'PERIOD
FEE:. $175.00
RECEIPT NO:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I
(To Be Completed by.APPL-ICANT)
CASE NO:
DATE:
Kenneth & Cathy,Donahoe
Applicant:
Address of Applicant: 3969 Park DR.. Carlsbad, CA 92008
619 434-6706 Phone Number:
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted'(i.f other than
Applicant):.*- SAME
GENERAL INFORMATI'ON:
Description of Project: Two single-family residence
Project Location/Address.-, 3660 Althea Lane, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Assessor Parcel Number: 207 120 65-
Zone of'Subj Coastal ect Property..
single family residence
Proposed Use of Site:
List all othec applicable applications related to this project:
N/A
Describe thei .activity areap includi
'
ng distiguishing-natural and man-m-ade.characteristic s; also provide precise slope analysis when
appropriate.
residential.nei.ghborhood containing therein two adjacent parcels
Describe energy cons ervation measures incorporated into the design
And/or .operation of the project-.
structures to conform with-city and county energy standards'
If residential,, -include the number of units, sched.ule of unit sizes,
range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected.
number units- two single family homes
size - 1900 sq.,ft. each
s . a 1 e ]~'r rc e - 250,_&OO
household size 2-6 occupants
S. If commArcial,' indicate the type, whether -neighborhood, city or
regionally oriented, square footage of sales area., and loading
facilities.
N/A
16. If industrial.,, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,.and.
loading facilities.
N/A
7. It institutional,'ind,i,cai,e the major function,, estimated employment per
shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benef.its
to be derived from the project.
N/A
I. -ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate
space. (Disd.uts all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessaryi)
YES NO
.1) Could the project significantly change present X land uses in the vicinity of the activity?
2). Could the activity affect the use of a recreational X area, or area of important aesthetic value?
Could the activity -affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood?
Could the activity result in.the displacement of
community residents?- X
Could the activity increase the number of low and X, modest cost housing units in the city?
Could the activity decrease the number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city? X
Are any of the~natural or man-made features in the X activity area unique,.that is, not found in other
parts of the county, state or nation?
.8), Could the activity significantly affect an X historical, or archaeological site-or its settings?
9)* Could the ac,tivity~siqnificantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a X
scarce natural resource?
10)..Does the~ activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction,-orconservatjon of a X
scarce natural resource?
Could the activity significantly -affect fish, X
wildlife or plant life?
Are there any rare or endangered plant species X
in the activity~area?
Could the acti vity change exi-sting features of. X
' any of the cityl,s lagoons, bays, or tidelands?
Could the-activity change existing features of X
any of the city's beaches?.
Could the activity result in the erosion or X
elimination of. agricultural lands?,
Could the activity serve to encourage development X of presently undeveloped areas orAntensify develop-'
ment l of already developed areas.?
YES NO.
17) Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water X noise,, etc.)?
is) Will the activity require certific.a tion, authoriza-
tion or issuance of a permit-by any local,, state or
federal environmental control agency?
19) Will:the activity require issuance of a variance X or conditional use permit by the.City?
10) Will-the activity,il nvolve the application, Use, or X disposal of potentially'haz&rdous materials?
Will tbe~activity involve const.ru.ctio"nl of X facilit-les in a flood plain?
22)~ Will the activity involve construction of X facilities in the area of an active fault?
Will the activity involve construction of X facilities on a slope of 25 percent.or greater?
Could the activity result. inthe generation of X significant amounts of noise?
Could the activity re
'
sult in the generation .of X significant amounts of.dust?
Will the activity involve the burning of brush, X trees,.or.ot-,her materialls?
Could the activity result in a significant change X in the qua
'
lity of any portion of the region's air
or water resources? (Should note surface,ground
water, off-shore.)
18) Will the project substantially increase..fue'l X
'consumption (electricity, oil t natural -gas,.etc.)?
29) Will there be a significant change to existing X
land form?
Indicate estimated grading-to be done in
cubic yards: AL/19 C-1 k/
Percentage o lalterati,6n' to the present
land form,: A~Ll)
Maximum heigh of cut or fill Slopes:
-41
30) Will the-activity result in substanti'al increases X in the use of ut-ilities, sewers, drains or streets?
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger.
project or series of projects? X
STATEMENT OF-NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
I f you have answered yes to',One or more of the questions in Section
I but YOU think the: actiVitY will have no signif icant environmental
effectst indicate yourireasons below:
N/A
COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY-OF THE-QUESWONS IN SECTION I
(if additional space is heeded for answering any questions, attach
additional sheets as -needed.)
Signature
(Person Completing Report)
Date Signed 01-~~F/
0
mi ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORK PART Il
(TO BE COMPETED BY THRPLANNINGDEPARTMENT)
CASE NO.- R.E. 2.89.12
DATE: March 2. 1989
BACKGROUND
APPLICANT: Kenneth and Cathy Donahoe
ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 3969 Park Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
(619) 434-6706
DATE CHECK*LIST SUBMITTED: ADril 6. 1989,
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written
under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
Unstable earth conditions
or in changes, in geologic
substructures?
Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering
of the soil?
Change in topography or ground
surface relief features7
The destruction, covering of
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or
off the site?
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel or a
river or stream or~the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
X
X —
X
- - X
X -
0
YES - MAYBE NO
X,
X
X
2. Air - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or a I ny
change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
3. Water - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters?
Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patters, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in Any water body?
Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to, temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or' through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Reduction in theamount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies?
X —
X
X —
X
X
X
-2-
YES MAYBE 140
4. Plant Life - Will-the proposal.
have significant results in:
Change in the diversity of species,
.or numbers of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops,, microflora and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique,, rare or endangered species
of plants? X
Introduction of new species of.plants
into an area, or in a barrier to the'
normal replenishment of existing
species? X
Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop? X
5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptilest fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)? X
Reduction of the numbers,of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? X
Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration.or movement of
animals? X
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat? X
6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly
increase existing noise levels? X
7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig-
nificantly produce new light or glare? X
8. Land Use - Will the proposal have
significant results in the alteration of
the present or planned land use of an
area? X
-3-
YES MAYBE 140
9. Natural Resources - Will theproposal
have significant results in:,
Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources? X
Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource? X
10. Risk of URset - Does the proposal
involve a significant ri
'
sk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident
or upset conditions? X
11. Por)ulation - Will the proposal signif-
icantly alter the location, distribu-
tion, density, or growth rate of the . human population,-of an 'area? X
12. Housing - Will the proposal signif-
icantly affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? X
13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the
proposal have significant results in:
Generation of additional vehicular
movement? X
Effects on existing parking facili-
ties,- or demand for new parking? X
Impact upon existing transportation
systems? X
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? X
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air tra-flic? X
Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? X
-4-
YES- MAYBE NO
14. Public Services - Will the proposal have
a significant effect upon,-or have signif-
icant results in the need for new or
altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
Fire protection? X
Police protection? X
Schools? X
Parks or other recreational
facilities? X
Maintenance of public -facilities,
including roads? X
Other governmental services? X
15. Energy - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? X
Demand upon existing sources of
energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy? X
16. Utilities - Will the proposal have'
significant results in the need for new
systems, or alterations to the.following
utilities:
Power or natural gas? X
Communications systems? — X
Water? — — X
Sewer or septic tanks? X
Storm water drainage? — — X
Solid waste and disposal? X
17. Human Health - Will the proposal have
significant results in the. creation of
any health hazard or potentialhealth
hazard (excluding mental health)? X
-5-
0
YES MAYBE NO
Aesthetics - Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal result in
creation of an aesthetically offensive
public view? X
Recreation - Will the proposal have*
significant results in the impact upon
the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? X
Archeological/Historical/Paleontological
- Will the proposal have significant
results in the alteration of a significant
archeological, paleontological or
historical site, structure, object or
building? _X'
Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter-
nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
CM
0 0
YES MAYBE* NO
22. Mandatory findings of significance -
Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
level
-
s, threaten-to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered,plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
Does the,project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well,-into the future.
Does the project have the possible
environmental effects-which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the . effects of probable future projects.)
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,,
either directly or indirectly?
X
X
— — X
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION,
The proposed project consists of approximately 340 cubic yards of grading
for development of a single family residence. The proposed project is
harmonious with thezurrounding neighborhood of single family residences and
will not have a significant impact on the environment. The site is one of
two remaining undeveloped lots on Althea Lane.
Rev. 12/88
-7-
bISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION(Continued)
The site is located in Local Facilities Management Zone 1, and the. approved
Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 has guaranteed the adequacy of
public facilities for proposed development within the zone.
-8-
0
iV...DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X I - find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the -envirorment,,and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although theproposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project, A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
April 10, 1989
Date
iq little- 177
Date,
A ' AMN ~T~ S, -
Si4n,#-ure
V.MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
-9-
40
AITIGATING'MEASURES (Continued.)
VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT IHAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
-10-
CITY OF CARLSBAD - GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
CITY PROJECT NO& 2-- fty ;.- c.rry PROJECT NAME
CITY DRAWING NO. A,9f,.r CITY PROJECT ENGINEER
B. T FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE INCLUDED 'IN EACH, RESUBMITTAL:
17 TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM ENGINEER OF WORK LISTING ALL ITEMS BEING SUBMITTED.
COPY OF PREVIOUS TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM THE CITY.
X LA I ~—e THREE (3) SETS OF BLUEUNES OF THE CORRECTED GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL P NS SEALED AND S GNED
JlY THE ENGINEER OF WORK AND THE SOILS ENIGINEEFL pamBuTION: I PLANCHECKEA, I FILE. I PLANNING). 4.,qAf4WC-(2) SETS OF BOUND DRAINAGE REPORT SEALED AND SIGNED By THE ENGINEER OF WORK CORRECTED AS
,,,NECESSARY.
TWO (2) SETS OF BOUND SOILS REPORT SEALED AND SIGNED. BY THE SOILS ENGINEER CORRECTED AS NECESSARY.
=6. TWO.(2) SETS ENGINEER'S qOST TE FOR BONDING PURPOSES CORRECTED AS NECESSARY SEALED AND SIGNED
BY THE ENGINEER:OF
5
k-7, TWO (2) SETS OF THE. EA RK QUANTITY CALCULATIONS CORRECTED AS NECESSARY, SIGNED AND SEALED BY
ENGINEER OF WORK
Ei IMINAF ,Vr)k~~ SETS OF THE Ry TITLE REPORT.
9. ALL PREVIOUS CHECKPFIINTS OF PLANS, REPORTS, CALCULATIONS AND ESTIMATES.
=lo. ITEMS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THE COPY OF tHE PREVIOUS TRANSM17TALfROM THE CITY.
111. ~ CONCURRENT RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING: FINALIPARCEL MAP_ IMPROVEMENT PLANS, LANDSCAPE AND 44~4 NTS L IRRIGATION PLANS, AND EASEMENT DOCUME CORRECTED AS NECESSARY WHEN SUCH MAP, PLANS, AND
DOCUMENTS ARE,REQUIRED.
PLAN BLUEUNES FOLDED TO 9 INCHES BY 12 INCHES.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS REQUIRED
C. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL OF THE PLANS:
TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM ENGINEER OFWO,RK LISTING ALL ITEMS BEING SUBMITTED.
COPY OF PREVIOUS TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM THE CITY.
ALL PREVIOUS CHECKPRINTS OF PLANS, REPORTS, CALCULATIONS.AND ESTIMATES.
TWO (~) SETS OF THE CORRECTtD BLUELINES OF THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN.
ORIGINAL MYLARS OR PHOTO MYLARS OF THE PLANS SEALED;AND SIGNED BY THEENGINEER OF WORK AND SOILS
ENGINEER. THE MYLARS MUSTALSO BE SIPNEDBY THE OWNERAND OTHER SIGNATURES AS PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED.
(NO STICKY BACKS ALLOWED AND AUL,SIGNATURES, MUST BE ORIGINAL AND IN PERMANENT BLACK INK)
GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION COMPLETED, CURRENT AND SIGNED BY THE OWNEIVAPPLICANT.
HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENTFOR DRAINAGE FULLY EXECUTED AND NOTARIZED.
a. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL BOND,, CASH SECURITY, AND,AG,REEMENT.
CONCURRENT APPROVAL OF THE EROSION CONTROL SHEETS WITH GRADING PLAN.
CONCURRENT APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING: FINALIPARCtL MAP, IMPROVEMENT PLANS, LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION
PLANS AND EASEMENT DOCUMENTS WHEN SUCH MAP, PLANS, AND, DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED.
ITEMS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THE COPY OF THE PREVIOUS TRANSMITTAL FROM THE CITY.
PLAN BLUEUNES FOLDED TO 9 INCHES BY 12 INCHES.
PAYMENT OF THE BALANCE OF GRADING PLANCHECK FEE AND ANY FEE PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS
SUB11111111TAL COMPLETE. CHECKED BY DATE
COMMENTS:
NOTE: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE REQUIRED AFTER C17Y ENGINEER APPROVAL OF THE PLANS AND ON
OR BEFORE GRADING PERMIT ISSUANCE:
THREE (3) SETS OF BLUEUNES OF THE APPROVED PLANS (DISTRIBUTION: I FILE. 2 INSPECTOR).
APPROVED HAUL ROUTE APPUCAT16N (IF APPLICABLE).
APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN AND A VAUD RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT (IF APPLICABLE).
VAUD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT IF WITHIN THE COASTAL ZONE.
A COPY OF THE LETTER OF COMPLETION OF GRADING PLANCHECIV DATED.,
ITEMS,REQUIRED AND SHOWN ON THE *LETTER OF COMPLETION OF GRADING PLANCHECIC.
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE.
a. GRADING PERMIT FEE (rO BE PAID AT PERMIT ISSUANCE) AND ALL OTHER FEES LISTED ON THE *LETTER:OF COMPLETION OF
GRADING PLANCHECK!
9. ADDITIONAL ITEMS REQUIRED:
SEE REVERSE SIDE PAGE: 2 OF 2
P:\DOC%CHKLST\GRAERO.CHK
Revision Date 01/25/91
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
CITY PROJECT NO. CITY PROJECT NAME
CITY DRAWING NO. CITY PROJECT ENGINEER
,PLEASE NOTE:
TO INSURE THE TIMELY PROCESSING OF PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE CITY THOSE SUBMITTING PLANS FOR CITY REVIEW SHOULD CHECK THEIR SUBMITTAL PACKAGti FOR COMPLETENESS AND COMPLIANCE TO THE FOLLOWING CHECKLIST. APPLICANTS ARE REQUIRED
TO ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETENESS BY INITIALING THE SPACES PROVIDED FOR EACH ITEM. CITY STAFF WILL INVENTORY THESE ITEMS UPON SUBMITTAL
UNLESS SPECIFICALLY MARKED *NlAm (NOT APPLICABLE) AND INITIALED BY THE CITY PROJECT
ENGINEER ALL ITEMS LISTED ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED.
PLEASE Db NOT DETACH THIS CHECKLIST WHEN ATfAcHED To THE PLANS. THIS CHECKLIST IS A PART OF THE PLAN CHECK COMMENTS.
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY PROJECT ENGINEER AT 438-1161,
EXTENSION
A. THE FOLLOWING. ITEMS MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL:
TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM ENGINEER OF WORK LISTING ALL ITEMS BEING SUBMITTED.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (E.I.A.) FORM PART I COMPLETED AND SIGNED OR- COPY OF PREVIOUS
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE By CITY I.E. NEGATIVE DECLARAT16N ETC. (IF GRADING EXCEEDS 250 CY). SEE CURRENT
FEE SCHEDULE FOR ACCOMPANYING FEE.
GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION FORM COMPLETED AND SIGNED BY OWNERIAPPLICANT.
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMMAPPLICATION COMPLErEDAND SIGNED OR PROOF OPHILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
APPROVAL (IF PROPERTY CONTAINS OVER IS% SLOPE OR ELEVATION DIFFERENCE OF IS FEET).
THREE (3) SETS OF BLUELINE PRINTSOF THE GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLANS SEALED AND SIGNED BY THE
ENGINEER OF WORK AND THE SOILS ENGINEER. (D ISTRIBUTION: I PLANCHECKER, 1 FILE, 1 PLANNING).
TWO (2) SETS OF BOUND DRAINAGE REPORT SEALED AND SIGNED BY ENGINEER OF WORK
TWO (2) SETS OF BOUND SOILS REPORT SEALED AND SIGNED BY SOILS ENGINEER. (IF REPORT IS MORE THAN 6
MONTHS OLD, IT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BYA LETTER FROM THE SOILS ENGINEER STATING THAT (A) THE CONDITIONS
ON THE SITE HAVE NOT CHANGED SINCETHE REPORT AND (B) ALL OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS MADE ARE STILLVALID
AND IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT CITY CODE).
S. TWO (2) SETS OF ENGINEERS COST ESTIMATE FOR BONDING PURPOSES SEALED AND SIGNED BY ENGINEER OF WORK
TWO (2) SETS OF EARrHWORK QUANTITY CALCULATIONS SIGNED AND SEALED BY ENGINEER OF WORK
TWO (2) SETS OF PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT DATED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF SUBMITTAL IF OFFSrrE GRADING IS
PROPOSED A SEPARATE TITLE REPORT IS REQUIRED FOR THE OFFSITE PROPERTY.
ONE (1) SET OF THE CrlYS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (IF APPLICABLE).,
-12. ONE (1) SET OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CONDITIONS IF WITHIN THE COASTAL ZONE.
a ONE (1) SEr OF BLUELINtS OF THE APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP OR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PREVIOUSLY SIGNED BY
PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS WHEN SUCH MAP ARE REQUIRED -BY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ONE (1) SET OF REFERENCE MAPS OR DRAWINGS.
A LETTER OF PERMISSION TO GRADE FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER (IF GRADING ENCROACHES INTO
ADJACENT PROPERTY).
INCLUSION OF THE EROSION CONTROL SHEETS WITH GRADING PLAN.
CONCURRENTSUBMITTALOFTHE FOLLOWING: FINAL/PARCEL MAP, IMPROVEMENT PLANS,LANDSCAPEAND IRRIGATION
PLANS AND EASEMENT DOCUMENTS (WHEN SUCH MAP, PLANS AND DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED).
PLAN BLUELINES FOLDED TO 9 INCHES BY 12 INCHES.
PLANCHECK DEPOSIT (SEE FEE SCHEDULE). BALANCE OF PLANCHECK FEE TO BE PAID PRIORTO SIGNING OF PLANS.
SUBMITTAL COMPLETE. CHECKED BY DATE
COMMENTS
- SEE REVERSE SIDE - PAGE: I OF 2
P:\DOCS\CHKLS'T\GRAERO.CHK.
RwAsion Date 01/25/91
Green Paper