Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPIP 00-04; Carlsbad Airport Center Lot 24; Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) (6)*’ City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM March 5,2001 TO: Mike Grim, Planning n / FROM: Jeremy Riddle, Engineering SUBJECT: SECOND REVIEW OF CRC LOT 24, PIP 00-04 The Engineering Department has completed a review of the above subject. We have reviewed the application against our 1“ review comments. From our review of the revised submittal the following are a list of remaining issues the applicant must address prior to Engineering staff making a final determination: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. IO. On the 1‘‘ sheet of the exhibit, revise the title of the sheet to state “site plan”, not “conceptual landscape planting plan”. Refer to 1 st review comments. On the conceptual grading plan, revise the design the existing sewer lateral is abandoned and a new one is installed. Sewer laterals are not permitted in driveways per City Standards. The preparation of a Hydrology/Hydraulics report will be included as a condition of approval for the PIP per your request. On the conceptual grading plan, include the approximate quantities of anticipated remedial earthwork (refer to soils report). On the conceptual grading plan, revise the legend to identify the proposed public water main and irrigation service. On the conceptual grading plan, identify why drainage from lot 24 appears to be routed to lot 23 near the southwest corner via a new storm drain. Storm water in this location historically drained to Dryden Place via an existing 18-inch RCP. Please clarify why drainage is being changed. On the conceptual grading plan, revise the location of the irrigation service so that it is located along Dryden Place right-of-way. This will allow for a “switch-over” once recycled water lines are installed in this area. Add a note to the preliminary grading plans stating “This project will include minimum IO-foot vertical curves on all driveway approaches to Dryden Place to soften grade breaks”. Add the driveway slope on the easterly proposed driveway. On the site plan, add EDU’s (sewer), GPM (potable), and GPM (recycled) generated or required by the project. There is sufficient project data (R&D, manufacturing, warehouse) to estimate these figures. * c CRC Lot 234 March 5,2001 Page 2 of 2 11. Address minor redline comments as noted on the returned site plan and conceptual grading plan. 12. A redlined check print is enclosed for the applicants use in making the requested revisions. This check print must be returned with the plan revisions to facilitate continued staff review. If you have any questions, please call me at 602-2737. Attachment c: Skip Hammann, Senior Civil Engineer (w/o attachment) File