Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPIP 00-04; Carlsbad Airport Center Lot 24; Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) (7)- City of Carlsbad March 7,2001 Michael J. Durkin 4660 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 1080 San Diego CA 92122 SUBJECT: PIP 00-04 - CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 24 Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your resubmittal of the Planned Industrial Permit, application no. PIP 00-05, as to the issues of concern to staff You should also be aware that some issues still remain. These issues, listed below, must be addressed before a final determination can be made on the application. In addition, the City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information required for the application. Please contact your staff planner, Michael Grim, at (760) 602-4623, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, MICHAEL JT HC~~MILLER Planning Director MJH:MG:mg C: Chris DeCerbo Jeremy Riddle File Copy: Steve Hall, Chapo and Hall Architects 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 (760) 602-4600 FAX (760) 602-8559 www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ P ISSUES OF CONCERN NO. PIP 00-04 - CARLSBAD RESEARCH CENTER LOT 24 Planning: 1. As stated previously, the proposed indoor employee eating area must be identified on the floor plans or the permit holder must accept a condition that requires the entire indoor eating area to be constructed with the first tenant improvement. Since the site plan indicates the amount of indoor eating area but the floor plan does not indicate where the eating area is, the project will be conditioned to require the entire indoor eating area simultaneous with the first tenant improvement. 2. As mentioned in the January 8, 2001 correspondence from the Planning Department, lot 23 of Carlsbad Research Center is located within the over 75 dBA CNEL noise contour for the McClellan-Palomar airport. According to the existing Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the airport (CLUP), the proposed uses are not allowed uses within that noise contour. Staff from the City, County, SANDAG and the airport are investigating this inconsistency and will apprise you of the outcome once derived. Engineering: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. On the first sheet of the exhibit, revise the title of the sheet to state “site plan”, not “conceptual landscape planting plan”. Refer to first review comments. On the conceptual grading plan, revise the design the existing sewer lateral is abandoned and a new one is installed. Sewer laterals are not permitted in driveways per City Standards. The preparation of Hydrology/Hydraulics report will be included as a condition of approval for the PIP per your request. On the conceptual grading plan, include approximate quantities of anticipated remedial earthwork (refer to soils report). On the conceptual grading plan, revise the legend to identify the proposed public water main and irrigation service. On the conceptual grading plan, identify why drainage from lot 24 appears to be routed to lot 23 near the southwest corner via a new storm drain. Storm water in this location historically drained to Dryden Place via an existing 18-inch RCP. Please clarify why drainage is being changed. On the conceptual grading plan, revise the location of the irrigation service so that it is located along Dryden Place right-of-way. This will allow for a “switch-over” once recycled water lines are installed in this area. Add a note to the preliminary grading plans stating “This project will include minimum IO-foot vertical curves on all driveway approaches to Dryden Place to soften grade breaks.” Add the driveway slope on the easterly-proposed driveway. c 10. On the site plan, add EDU's (sewer), GPM (potable), and GPM (recycled) generated or required by the project. There is sufficient project data (R&D, manufacturing, warehouse) to estimate these figures. 11. Address minor redline comments as noted on the returned site plan and conceptual grading plan. 12. A redlined check print is enclosed for the applicant's use in making the requested revisions. This check print must be returned with the plan revisions to facilitate continued staff review.