HomeMy WebLinkAboutPIP 89-13; Mercotac; Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) (2)October 12, 7989
Gary Seward
PLANT & COOK
2385 Camino Vida Roble, #lo7
Carlsbad, CA 92009
SUBJECT: PIP 89-13 Pacific Analytical
Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department
has reviewed your Planned Industrial Permit, application no. PIP 89-13, as to its completeness
for processing.
The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information
which must be submitted to complete your application. All list item must be submitted
simultaneouslv at the Communilv Development Buildim counter. and to the attention of Erin
Letsch. A COPY of this list must be included with your submWs. No processing of your
application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is
issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to
make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete,
processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you
have six months from the date the application was initially filed, September 78, 7989, to either
resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application
or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed
to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn,
a new application must be submitted.
Please contact your staff planner, Eric Munoz, at (679) 438-1 167 ext. 4471, if you have any
questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL J. HOLYMILLER
Planning Director
MJH:ENMlkd
cc: Charles Grimm
Erin Letsch
Bob Wojcik
AngelinalCrystal
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 (619) 438-1 161
UST OF l7EM NEEDED
TO COMPLETE APPLIaTJON:
NO. PIP 89-13
PUWNING:
1. Need colored elevations
2. Employee eating areas does not meet all applicable requirements. Review Administrative
Policy No. 79 and Chapter 21.34.070 of the Zoning Code.
3. Site plan and landscape plan are significantly inconsistent.
lssuES OF CONCERN
1. Need more detail on floor plans. Inconsistencies belween proposed uses and uses
shown.
2. Give breakdown and percentage of compact vs. standard car spaces.
3. Break up rows of parking spaces in excess of 10. More landscaping required in parking
area.
4. No parking overhand allowed into setbacks.
5. Dimensions must scale out accurate&.
6. Trash enclosure area must be well screened from adjacent lot.
2
1. Label PIP 89-1 3.
2. Proposed sign on corner of Cone De La Pina and Corte Del Cedro is in the trees.
3. Include typical section of driveway.
4. Include AB and AC thickness on typical street section.
5. Drainage:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
9.
h.
Show existing storm drain and curb outlet which drains onto Corte De La Pina
near intersection of Corte Del Cedro.
Label line, inlet, and outlet to street for line shown at western boarder on Corte
De La Pina.
Drainage can not go onto Lot 1. Show how you will handle drainage from
parking lot passed fire access.
Clarify drainage near fire access.
Label drainage line shown under driveway (Corte Del Cedro).
Label all lines proposed or existing.
Drainage can not cross sidewalks or driveways (per Carlsbad Ordinance
21.#.080(11)).
Include proposed elevations.
6. Circulation:
a.
6.
C.
d.
e.
f.
9.
h.
i.
If you choose to pursue proposed diagonal loading, you’ll need to show sunken
loading wells on building plans and elevations. A deed restriction will also be
placed on the propew stating the depressed truck wells will be there.
Entire truck must fit in loading bay.
Show loading bay on floor plans.
Direction of loading bay shown on Site Plan does not agree with landscape plan.
There is a loading door shown on elevations, not shown on Tentative Map or
Floor Plans.
Loading doors shown on elevations are not large enough for proposed loading.
Proposed truck access through fire access:
1) Does not agree with site visit. Parking for adjacent Lot #I spaces are in
2) Need reciprocal access agreement or agreement for truck access to Lot
Fig. 407E cuts off compact spaces as shown on redlined site plan.
Can not use curved driveways. Design to act as an intersection.
proposed driveway.
1.
3
7. Show driveway location across the street and distance to centerline of driveway. And
show distance to center line of adjacent driveway.
8. Proposed parking spaces on northern boundary do not scale out.
9. Show entire driveway through adjoining Lot 1 to Yarrow Dr. to be sure fig. 407E
circulation works. Is this the intent, please clariw.
10. Title report calls out Pacific Telephone easement (Item #3). Submit site plan to them
and include their approval of building location prior to approval of Planned Industrial
Permit.
11. Include contours of slope or spot elevations at top of slope and bottom of slope.
12. Break average daily traffic into uses (ie. warehouse and office). Show square footages
used to calculate ADT.
4