HomeMy WebLinkAboutPIP 93-03; Knorr's Beeswax; Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) (2)f
January 11, 1994
Ken Smith
Structureform
435 West Bradley Avenue, Suite C
El Cajon, CA 92020
SUBJECT: PIP 93-03 - KNORR'S BEESWAX
Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department
has reviewed your Planned Industrial Permit, application no. PIP 93-03, as to its completeness for
processing.
The items requested from you earlier to make your Planned Industrial Permit, application no. PIP
93-03 complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Department. It has been
determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of
your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the
date of this communication.
Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that
could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be
resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in
the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement
the basic information required for the application.
Please contact your staff planner, Jeff Gibson, at (619) 438-1161 extension 4455, if you have any
questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application.
GEW:JG:Ih
C: Michael J. Holzmiller
Chris DeCerbo
Bobbie Hoder
Bob Wojcik
File Copy
Data Entry
Marjorie/Rich
Steve ffiorr
14906 Via de la Valle
Del Mar, CA 92014
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009-1 576 - (61 9) 438-1 161 @
A
ISSUES OF CONCERN
No. PIP 93-03 - Knorr's Beeswax
ENGINEERING:
Traffic and Circulation
1. Thank you for indicating the truck well percent grade in your letter to staff, however, as
previously requested, please indicate this gradient on the Site Development Plan (SDP).
Additionally, on the conceptual grading plan, please change the 84.7 feet Top of Wall (TW)
elevation designation to Bottom of Wall (BW).
Drainaze
2. Discrepancies exist between the SDP and grading regarding the existing modified type "F"
catch basin. Is this existing basin going to remain? If so, please show it on the grading
plan. Or, is the new catch basin, which is shown on the grading plan, actually the existing
catch basin relocated; or, is the existing basin removed and salvaged and the new catch
basin constructed? Please verify and show consistent drainage designs on both the SDP and
grading plan.
3. The grading plan still indicates that a D-25 curb drain is intended to be utilized for drainage
purposes, however, your letter to staff states that this will be deleted. Since existing
underground storm drain can still be utilized to drain the site, again, please delete this D-25
curb drain.
4. Regarding National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) criteria, thank you for
labeling the area where a vegetated swale will be located to help mitigate urban pollutant
runoff. However, the City currently requires a functional design to actually be shown on
the SDP. For this project, please show the following on the SDP:
0 Show actual vegetated swale.
0 Show a cross-section of the vegetated swale.
0 Show drainage patterns from the parking area to the vegetated swale.
0 Show how'runoff will flow into the vegetated swale, i.e., curb cuts, drains, etc.
Additionally, the NPDES additions to the SDP should also be consistently shown on the
landscape and grading plans. The current plan indicates that ru,noff will not be directed
into the vegetated swale. Please revise these plans.
Land Title
5. As previously requested, please provide copies of Preliminary Title Report (PTR) Item Nos.
5 and 6, PTR Item No. 4 does not have to be provided, and plot any associated easements.
Indicate the easements future disposition on the SDP. Referring staff back to the PTR is
unacceptable.
Attached is a second set of redlined check prints. These check prints MUST BE RETURNED with
the revised plans to facilitate continued review.