HomeMy WebLinkAboutPIP 97-04; Cornerstone Corporate Centre; Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) (13)06/12/1997 16:88 6194531913 ., /
BRIAN PAUL ASSOCIATE - PAGE 81
URI'AN PAUl 6
,, A,SSOCIATE5 '\ , 4
P PZANNCUS
4RCNITECTS
June 1 1,1997
MEETING NOTES
Re: Cornerstone Corporate
Present: Terri Woods, CPD
Ken Quon, CPb
James McCann, NNC
john Couvillion, NNC
Mark Rowson, L33
Don Ueno, KTU +A
Brian Paul, BPA
Len Zegarski, BPA
Meeting Date: 10 June 1997
Centre PIP
Location: Carlsbad Planning Department
Purpose: Review design alternatives in response to Planning Department comments.
I. IC introduced the project team and presented design alternatives in response to comments
and direction received from the Planning Department. The alternatives and options focused
on the following locations:
A. Palornar Airport Road frontage.
1, Option I: Re-grade the entire 85-foot of frontage between PL and top of pad with an
undulating slope varying between 3:l and 1.5:l. Install new plant material as
existing vegetation will be removed.
incorporated a series of 1.5:l slopes and 7-foot high planted retaining walls, Install
additional plant material to supplement existing landscaping.
photographs of the site were provided to describe the design options.
2. , Option II: Maintain the first 50-feet of frontage including vegetation and
3. Grading plans, landscape plans, 3-D computer models, site sections and
B. East property line, adjacent to Lat 9, open space.
1. A site plan was presented with the following changes:
a, All building setbacks were increased by &feet to meet zoning requirements for
buildings exceeding the 35-feet allowable height limit. Parking is located 16-
66/12/1997 16: 88 6194531913 - - BRIAN PAUL ASSOCIATE PAGE 02
MTG NOIXS:
June 1 1,1997
feet from the front yard setback at Wright Place and 16-feet from the rear yard
setback at Lot 9.
b. The pool and spa facility was moved outside the 31-foot rear yard setback.
c. Mechanical equipment enclosures for Building C and D are located within the
rear yard setback but located16-feet back from the PL. Surrounding walls are 6-
feet above adjacent grade.
outside all building setbacks.
some parking exceeds the 300-foot maximum travel distance to the building.
maximum oflO-feet above adjacent grade with a 2:l slope bank from the top of wall
to top of pad.
3. A site plan, grading plan, landscape plan and site section were provided to describe
the design alternative.
d. Trash enclosures for Buildings C and D are located within the parking lot well
e. The parking ratio of 1 car per 250 GSF of building was maintained. However,
2. The revised parking and drive aisle at the east PL reduced retaining wall height to a
C. West property line, adjacent to Lot 12, vacant lot.
1. The revised setback at the west PL reduced retaining wall height to a maximum of 8-
2. A site plan, grading plan, landscape plan and site section were provided to describe
feet above adjacent grade with a 2:l slope bank from the top of wall to top of pad.
the design alternative.
II. After presentation of the design alternatives TW and KQ indicated the following:
A. Overall circulation and access looks good. Some minor engineering issues exist.
B. Although retaining wall height has been reduced by 60% the walls still exceed 6-feet in
Engineering will respond with written comments.
height. Approving this is a policy issue and must be addressed at a higher administrative
level. TW will try to review the revised plan with Gary Wayne and/or Michael Holzmiller
by end of this week.
1. Encroachment into 50-foot slope bank.
2. Environmental analysis for Lot 9.
3. Height of entry walls at main entry.
4. Number of parking lot trees along the pad edge fronting Palomar Airport Road.
5. Status of cut and fill.
C. Other concerns raised by TW and KQ:
D. TW indicated parking distance will not be a problem under a PUD application.
Ill. JM stressed the time critical nature of the project in order to meet the TriTeal move in date
of April 1998.
please review and respond within five (5) days if content is incomplete or incorrect.
Prepared by: Len Zegarski for Brian Paul & Associates.
Revised by:
Copy: All present
Scott Merry, NCC