HomeMy WebLinkAboutPIP 97-04; Cornerstone Corporate Centre; Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) (4),-
BRIAN PAUL &
ARCHITECTS
& PLANNERS
September 15, 1997
Mr. Christer Westman
Associate Planner
Crty of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009- I575
RE: Cornerstone Corporate Centre
PIP 97-04 / HDP 97-07 / PUD 97- IO
Dear Mr. Westman:
Attached please find revised plans and documents for the above referenced project. These plans address the
following Planning and Engineering comments deemed necessary to complete the PIP/HDP/PUD application:
PI.
P2.
P3.
P4.
P5.
El.
E2.
E3.
Sheet AI .2 calls out the location, improvements and amenities provided for Building D.
In addition, Sheet AI . I provides a breakdown of the outdoor eating areas provided for the entire project
Sheets C2 of the PUD and PIP drawings show street sections through all three adjacent streets.
Sheet A2.4 locates all roof mounted equipment and calls out the height of all equipment relative to the roof
parapet elevation of 4 I ’-0” above finish grade.
A revised PFF agreement is attached.
550 parking spaces require I IO parking lot trees. 74 trees are provided in the parking lot proper and 37 trees
have been provided along the perimeter. This provides a total of I I I trees.
Sheets C I of the PUD and PIP drawings indicates the bearing and distance along the Palomar Airport Road
property line.
Sheets C2 of the PUD and PIP drawings show street sections through all three adjacent streets.
Sheets C2 of the PUD and PIP drawings provide a schedule of easements referenced to the Title Report.
In addition, the revised plans address the following issues of concern:
P I. All references to signs on the plans have been removed.
P2. No parking spaces will overhang or project into required yards.
P3. A letter of approval from SDG&E is attached.
P4. The landscape architect for the project has been in contact with Mr. Larry Black to discuss this issue.
Jr .. ‘
PIP/HDP/PUD
September 15, 1997
E I , The ADT counts have been revised to reflect 20 trips per I ,000 square feet of net building area.
E2. The trash and mechanical enclosures for Buildings C and D have been relocated away from the ends of parking
E2. The parking layout has been revised to conform to the 5’ clear distance as noted in on the “redlined” drawings.
rows to increase sight lights.
In addition, the parking laid out along the outside curve at two locations has been deleted based on the
recommendation from Engineering that a 60’ turning radius is not required for fire access.
filtering system. Refer to note Number 5.
E3. Sheets C2 of the PUD and PIP drawings indicate NPDES requirements have been addressed with a fossil
E4. Turning radii have been reduced to 42’ as recommended.
We believe these revisions address the issues identified in Mr. Michael J. Holzmiller’s letter dated September 5,
1997. As requested, we are providing four (4) complete sets of plans and returning the three (3) “redlined”
drawings provided by the Engineering Department. Our office looks forward to hearing your comments regarding
this re-submittal. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
BRIAN PAUL & ASSOCIATES, Inc.
Leonard Zeg nki,
Attachment
cc: James Mc Cann, NCC
John Couvillion, NNC