HomeMy WebLinkAboutPP 04; CITY OF CARLSBAD CANNON RD; Precise Plan (PP)C H E C K LIS T
A. Geology:
{"'I o t1
·0 CJ
:~:l n; o
fJ ::,.
u t1
;J
~
(j
k]'
C/)
C4 f..l., 0., q 0
[J e-,
I. NATURAL SYS'l'EHS: 1
r-----~r---------~
1. S.qil s tabili ty 0 .0 n . 'n I
2.. Soil expansive 0 T + + -I
3 •. '. D.:;c1rock s tLlbil~ ty .. (dil?/s~ope·?) 0 0 I 0 . 0 I
_ 4 • Hazards: faul t~ng, se~sml.C 0 0 ,01 : __ ·~O,---___ -+
susceptibili ty !-e 5. Hc;zard: subs.idencc, mudflO\v 0 t i + +
6. Economic or. subeconomic mineral 0'0 \ 0 o ..•
resource (oll, gold, etc.) I" ---I
7. Economic or subeconomic non-mineral 0 0 i 0 0
resource (gravel, geot11ermal, etc.) i
8. Er03ion potential, .(beach .erosion, 0 + ,+ + ' -
channel, slope, sheet?) _____ !--------;'-----:1-'------4
B. Hydrology: . '
-I
1. Flood plain 10-50-100 ·yr. 0 O. . Q 0 I
(Indicat'c on !--1ap' C) .
2. Aqni fer I aquifer recharge, • 0 'D 0 . I l.J I
p0rcolationl impermeable surface? _~ I I
3. Drainage and runoff, increase from --I e impcl."1r.eabte ~u::;face? . . 0 ------1
4. cha.nn01 s tu.bl.ll. ty 0 0 0 a ,
5. \'7 a ter resources _ fresh + 0 -.} '6 It II 1 . + + + I • .,... sat I 0 0 0 --0-1
7. It ,. brackish Q" 0 o. _.,---" -t
8. • II \I irrigation 0 -" 0 I n .,~--g--
9'-II II industrial 0 0 o· I 0
10. .. . 1\ do:ne s tic .. 0 0 0 1 0
==={
• 12. \I .. ch(:m~cal .. ',... u .l 0 l±0 . 0
13. .. II biologic U I 0 L~___ 0 ._ 0 -ll~. Pollution e::.;:isting 0 . J 0 0 J' o· 1
15. Pollu tio~ cxp~ctE:d I~. 0 . 0 I 0 I 0 '---1
• 16. Otho~r efZccts (Improve Dra.inage) _ + * I t !I--...;+~-----+
, . • Attachment No.1.
Page 2 . ____ -_--_""""'-__________ ....:.... __ ..l..--.---.:....~. ~~ ___ ~_
•
e
,~ ","-' 'I
t" •• ,; _
0'
t'
c. Climate:
1.
2.
3.
4.
,5.
,6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Air resources
Inversion
basin'
J\ir ,quality -CO I CO, NG .. , 50,1
Hydrocarbon, org~nic, par~iculates,
Pho tochemical smog j' Smog ,
Clarity
"lea ther
"
II
II ..
Noise
d 'f' t' 0 mo 1. :Lca'1.on:T
II Precipitation
II Humidity
/I vlind
" Other
D. Ecology: '
1. Flora:
", 2~ Fauna:
4
Phytoplankton--~\) red' .. JOod
Vegetativ~ cover
E,conor:'lic specie s
Endemics ,
Scientifically valuable
Pest species
Sucessional change
Other
::..
zooplankton~ elk ~r:. , I ! ..... '
Economic species . '.
etc.
Endemic sDccicS ' ;
Scicntifi"Cally valuable, :::1:'''-,:'cs
Pest species, vecto~s '
Other
3. Ecosystem stability
'4. 'PClcific
5.' Habit~t Suitabl1ity
6. 'Other
" "
e .<;;. ,I .. -
" """---~-.,...,---~......-....-.-.,. .. ~ ...... ,-.. .,..
"
i "
~ !:1 o
8
"C
o
o
o
o o
o
o
o
o
o
r. u
0
0
0
, r.
~
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,0
0
0
0
0
0
0
~' o f;}
~
/:,l
'r.::/
,
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Attachme'nt No.
\; t:
!$ '0 &
o .
o -.
o
o
0,
o o ..
o
o o
0
0
0
(j
0
0
0
0
0
'0
0
0
,0
0
0
0'
0
0,
0
Page 3
I !
U'
{;j
fleJ
o
o
o
o o •
0, g_
O o
,0
0
0 , 0
0
0
0
ge
0
0
0
0
0
0
'0
0
0
0
• r I f J ' , • , 4:.., :~ 0' .... )
"t {f: ~ 0 CtJ 0 f...I r .• }j ~ ~ 0 &. 5:: ~ ~' ~ fj & ~
II. SOCIAL SYS'l'El-1S:
A. Human Ecology:
1. Physical health + -+ .1 t ,+ . +
,2. 1,lental health '+ ' + + + , ,
3. Emotional hcalth. ., +' + + +
4., l,>os the tics -scenic views, ',+' + + +
design acceptibility tit s. ]l.rchcologic site!:? 0 0 0 0 '.
6. Historical sites 0 0 0 0 ' 'I,
7. Services -public, 'private
general
fire prQtection +' + + +,
police protection + +.' -+ +
heal th facilities + + +, + (, . schoots + + + .+
libraries + 7 + +
wuter O' 0 0 0
., sC'-.'.:1.9 0 + + + +
electricity + + +. +
gas + + + ' +
solid waste' + + ~ +
te 1 ophone " + + + . + ' e 0 the r ( 1 i g h t i ng) + . + ' + +
8. Recreation -pZlrks' , , + . + , + + ·e·
bi}:.e I foo t trails 0 ,0 0 0
playgrounds 0 0 . 0 0
ORV areas 0' 0' 0 0
• opcn, sp<J.ce ' + + .+ +
" \vilclcrness €) 0 0 ' 0
plt:lying fields ." ' 0 0 0 0
other
9. Land \.\S13 -recrc:u tion ,0 0, 0 0 ,
<:l.g i,-icu J. tural
industrial + + + +
co;mncrcial .' + .+ + + 9
ins t:i tu tional 0 0' 0 0 -:-'., ~. 1 • rCS1(\en\...~a
'-urban + -+ + + Attachment No.1 Page 4 o~h~~ _ 10 ..
II. SOCIAL SYSTEHS (Con tinued)
..
: :-
~'.-."
. -" .-., .
A. Human Ecology·
10. Circulation
11. Pa1:'king
12. Safety '-
13. Economy
."
•
Attachment No. 1 Page 5
foot
bike
car
bus
.truck
train
air
water
bicycle
motorcycle
car ,
bus & truck
camper
tri1iler
other
fire
flood
earthquake
accident
disease
radiCltion
noise
toxic wastes
other
tux on site
II off II
"
service costs on ~it~
II II off I:
ossessed valuation
unc·rnploymcn t
cmploymcn t nv<ti 10.hi
II .. tlcccnsib
type
'spending generated
industrial dem~~d tourism
{) , .. ,"1 c. \-~ __
" ~ . :"'J .-""_.
f i f.I /;J y.
8'
~
+
+
+
+
+.
+
o·
+ o o·
+
+
·0
o
o
+
+ o
+:
o
o
o
o
o
o
..j..
o
o
o
G
+
+
+ ...
. I .' -,.. ~. .a r..~ §,
'0 q
'+
.}
+
+
+
+
() ....
+. o
o
+
+ o o
o
+.
.' + o·
t
o· o·
o .
o
o
o
+
o o·
o
o
+ ..
+
+
'"
J t7
~.
~ o
+
+
+
+.
+
.+
.0
+ o
'0
+
+
o
o
o
.+
+ o
-t. o o
o.
o
o
o
+ o
o o
n v
+.
+
+
b' o
G.,
':1')'
i
+ +.
+ .+ •
,+
+ o
+ o
o
+
+
" 0 o
o
+
+ o .+
.0 o
o·
o
.0
o
+
.'0
·0
O·
o
+
. +. +.
e·
"
.'
e.
.~
II. SOCIAL SYS'l'EI'~S (Can \:inued) . , '
A. Ellil1an Eco iogy
14. population size '.
densi.ty
'distribution
racial balance -., II distribution .
ethnic II
age II
" ·sex &I
.r: '1 . J:0.nn y S l.ze
ot11cr
15 .. Housing -supply
ucmand
cost
quality
type
• density , ..
ttvu ilabili ty
other
16.. Commt].ni ty structure e rclocution
(). t ti tudes
boundaries
. .. . unily
other
17. Ed~c~tion availability •
,~ cost
-qua.lity • variet.y ." •
<.kmand
other
..
, ( ~J G' l...., I'( 6; t1 f!l '0
b ;;j ff Cr :::::. 0 /;t)' & ,;q q
. ·0 o. ' 0
0 0(, 0 : Q. ot 0.,
. o. .0 Of . '.
' .• 0'" 0 ~ . :" . '0:
o . 0 o. o· O' 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0" 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
O. 0 0
0 ·0 0 O· 0 0
0 0 O.
0 0 0
0 b ·0·
Q. b· o ;
O· .0 O.
0 '0 ·0
0 .0, 0 0 .
o· . o· 0
O. o· o ,
0 . O. . i o !
0 0, o .
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 .a 0
Attachment No. 1
. Pa·ge 6
U
.4J
CI')
& ~
'0
0
0
0
, ..
. '. .. . :0 • . .
o. e. '0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,
.0
0 .....
0
0 ·e.
'0.
0
'0 .
0
0
0
0
0
~
, I U ' , I) t-i ~ I-f if; f-i 0
/!j 0 i !;j .. ~ f;}
Of· ~ ~ ~ 0 Ai tJ., ,~ q
.II. SOCIAL SYSTEHS (continued)
A. Huma."1. Eco logy
. i8. Govern!,\ent city + + + +
special distri9t ,0 0 0 0
county -I-: + + :I-
regional +' + :+: + . ' e' " state " +-+ + +
federal ,+ , + + + e, qutllity 0·· 0: 0 0
efficiency 0 0 ,0 0
Clcccssibility 0 0 0 0
19. Planning conformu.nc~ 'vitn goals,
policies or actuu~ plans of:
city + -t-+ +
county + + + ,+
regional + + + +
state + + + +
nation +-+ + +~
.'
e .'_ ....
. .
'.
" Attachment No.1
Page 7-.
~.
• '. {J)
II. Assessment of Environmental Impact
Answer the follO\dng questions by placing a check in the appropriate space •
1. Could the project significantly change present uses of
the project area? (See Notes)
2. Could the project affect the use of a recreational area
or area of important aesthetic·value?
3. Could the project affect th~ functioning of'an establish-
ed co~~unity? (See Notes)
4. Could the project result in the displacement of community
residents?
5. Are any of the natural or man-made' features in the project
area unique, that is not found in other parts of the
County, State, or nation? (See Notes)
6. Could the proj ect significantly affec't a historical or
archaelogical site or its setting? (See Notes)
7. Could the.project significantly affect the potential
use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural
resource? (S~e Notes)
8. Does the project area serve as a habitat, food source,
nesting place, source of water, etc. for rare or
endangered wildlife or fish species?
9. ,Could the project significantly affect fish, wildlife,
or plant life?
10. Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the
project area?
l~. Could the project change existing features of any of the
region's lagoons, bays, or tidelands?
12. Could the project change existing features of any of the
region's beaches?
13. Could the project change existing features of any of the
region'~ desert areas?
14. Could the project result in the erosion of agricultural
lands?
15. Could the project serve to encourage development of
presently undeveloped areas or intensify development
of already developed areas? (Sec Notes)
. ' Yes No
x
x .
x
x
x
x
x
x -
x
x
x -
x
x
x
\
I.
16. • • \'lill the project require a variance from established
environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)?
17. Will the project requirc certification, authorization
or issuance of a permit by any local, Statc, or Federal
environmental control agency? . (See Notes)
18. Will the 'project require issuance of a special use
permit by. the County?
19. lqill the project involve the application, use, or disposal
or potentially hazardous materials?
20. Will the proj eet involve cOllstruction of facilities in'
a flood plain?
21. Will the project involve construction of facilities
on a slope of 25 per cent or greater?
22. Will the project involve construction of facilities
in the area of an active f~ult?
23. .,Could. the proj eet result in the generation of significant
amounts of noise?
24. Could the project result in the generation of significant
amounts of dust?
15. Will the project involve the burning of brush, trees,
or other ·materials?
26. Could the project result in a significant change in the
quality of any portion of the region's air or water
resources? (Should note surface, ground ''later, off-
'shore)
Yes
x
x
x
x
x
' ..
x
x ---
x
x
x
• I I I. Statement of No Significant Environmental Effects
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in
Section I t, but still think the project will have no significant
environmental effects, indicate your reasons below.
The use of Recreational Areas will be improved due to
improved access.
The Project will allow the implementation of zoning on
existing parcels which do not presently have access.
IV. Conclusions
Place a check in the appropriate box
[X) It has been determined that the project will not have
significant environmental effects.
[ ] It has been determined that the· project could have sig-
nificant environmental effects. An environmental impact
statement will be submitted on (approximate date)
! • STAFF REPORT/M.EMORAND~UM • October 24, 1972
.,'
TO: PLANN I N:G COMM I SSI ON
f
FROM: . PLANNI NG DEPARTME.NT
SUBJECT: ·~:E~~~.~~D O~ M~~·~.M~~·~~~l~Np~~N~cf~~6~ O~O~~ T~~R.g~~~~~~ T ION
APPL I CANT: City of Cad-s.bad .. -' .... --~ -... -_ .. --.. --_ ...... -_.---_ .... -_ ... "---- -..... ---"',-'-... --_ ...... --,--.. ~ -... _ ..... ~ .. --.... --
Repo.rt s u.bm i t ted· by.: City Manager, Building, Fire, Parks & .
Recreati.on, 'Eng i n,eer i ng and P·lc;l,hh (ng bepa rtments'
-------------.-~---~-----------------~----------~--~--~-~-------~-
Gener:a 1 Di scuss ion:
The 'Property owners have reque·sted the City to construct Cannon Road
from Carlsbad Blvd. to Interstate 5 Freeway by formation of an
Asse$smeRt District.
Thi 5 roadwa y is shown on the ,c I reu 1 a t i on element of the adopted
G e n era 1 P 1 ~H1 a san art e ria 1 r oa dW8 y 1 02 lin wid t h •
Exis·t'irig zoni'r;g is Publ ic Util'lty on North s"ide, Residential on.:
th~ South side between Car l:s.b·ad Sou l·eva.rd and 1-5 Freeway. The
N/W and SjE quadrants of the Jr:eeway ti;lre zoned commercial (specific
plan). . .
Recomrnenda t ions:
, -1.-.. . The staff recommends that .R,esolution No. 850, reporting on the
conformfty of this project ~ifh the General Plan, be approved.
Reasons for AjDprova 1:
1. The s.ubject project conforms with the General Plan.
2. An .E.nvi ronmental Impa.ct Assessment has been subm'itted to the
Planrti og Department.
Cond i dons of Ap:p rova 1.: .
1 ~ "hat 'the Planning DepEi.rtment concur with tne G.ol1clusio8 of
Er')V.ironmentallmpact Assessment determining insignificant
af'fecton t'he 'envi ronme:nt.
.D.A~ AGATEP, irector
: -,-l ,", '; . ,' ~ ~ '.1 .
• ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
CANNON ROAD IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION
This project involves the widening and improvement of existing
Can non R 0 ad, (f rom 60 Ito 79' rig h t 0 f way), bet \tv e e n Car 1 s bad
Boulevard and El Arbol, a length of approximately 1/6th of a mi Ie,
and the open i ng and consitructi on of Cannon Road, (102' right of
way), from El Arbol to east of Interstate 5, a length of approxi-
mately 1/2 mile. The circulation element of the General Plan provides
that Cannon Road will eventually extend east across El Camino Real
and connect to a major road in the Oceanside-Vista Area.
The construction involved in the project wil I involve grading,
paving, underground util ities, street I ighting, storm drains, and
sanitary sewers. This construction is the first phase in the
development of Cannon Road as a,major component of the City's
circulation system. It provides a vital link by connecting old
Highway 101 with the Interstate 5 Freeway across the AT&SF Railroad.
The total cost of this project is estimated at $300,000, of which
10% will be financed by publ ic funds and the remainder will be
assessed to benefiting property owners fronting on the street.
At the present time the Cannon Road interchange and the railroad
crossing are officially closed to publ ic traffic. However, the
route is presently being used by residents in the area, as well
as the publ ic util ity company, as access to the Interstate 5 Free-
way.
The short range land uses in the area will be affected by this
project as follows:
1) Between Carlsbad Blvd. and the AT&SF Railroad there will
be no effect on land use.
2) Between the AT&SF Railroad and the easterly end of the
project, there will be a significant effect on three of
the four freeway quadrants. Two of the quadrants are presently
zoned commercial (under specific plan), and are vitally
dependent on this .project for access. A third quadrant is
zoned RA-10,000, but could potentially develop as a freeway
oriented site. The fourth quadrant will not be affected, in
as much as the present p.O. zone Master Plan designates
this quadrant as open space. 1
IJ.