HomeMy WebLinkAboutPS 89-72; Carlsbad Cadillac; Sign Permits/Programs (PS)'i
State of California, George Deukme j ian 8 Governor.
California Coastal Commission
1333 Camino Del Rio S., Suite 125
'San Diego, Ca 92108
i
(619) 297-9740 '. .
This. is to certify that this location andlor proposed project has been reviewed by the
staff on the San Diego Coast District Commission. A coastal development permit is not
necessary because of the itm(s) checked below. Appropriate local permits may AOW be
obtained. ... : ...... ". .... .. _. "
,r .... I. . e. .. The site is not located within ,the coastal permit area as adopted in 'the California
Coastal Act of 1976 and effective January 1, 1977, +nd modified effective.January 1
1980. c
,.
The proposed development is included'in Catagorical Exclusion No.
adopted by the California.Coasta1 CO~SS~OA.
The' proposed development is judged to .be repair or maintenance activity not
resulting in an addition to or enlargement or expansion of the object of such ;
.. .. ...... .... .-,.
. activities (Section 30610(dI of Coastal Act).
... : ..
The proposed development is an improvement to an -existkg single family
residence (Section 30610(c) of the Coastal Act) gnd not located in the area
between the sea and first coastal road or 300 feet (whichever is greater)
(Section 13250(b) (4) of Administrative Regulations) .
The proposed development is an improvement to an existing single family
residence and is located in the area between the sea and the first coastal
road or 300 feet (whichever is greater) but is not a) an increase of 10% or
more of internal floor area, b) the construction of an additional story, or
c) a significant non-attached structure (Sections 30610 (a) of Coastal Act
and Section 13250(b) (41 of Administrative Regulations).
The proposed development is an interior modification to an existing use with . no change in the density or intensity of use (Section 30106 of Coastal Act). .
The proposed development is an improvement to 8.: stryctiie other than- a single
rarnily residence or public works facility and is not included in excluded . .
catagories of development (Section 13253 of Administrafive Regulati?ns).'
The proposed development' is the rebuilding of a structyre, other a
public works facility , destroyed by. datkal ' disaster .' ' The replacement
conforms to all of the requirements of Coastal Act Section 30610($). ..
The proposed developme& is exempt Mer Section of the
Commission's "Interpretive Guideline on Exclusions .from Permit Requirements."
Other: ..TmF&.i<... I . . I\. * ..$hi M.ibti1lJi.d
. -. .< ,. f I .'
..i . ,. :' ; .. ,.
.$ *' , I., 1 . .l . * * : ', .
1,
..
,!
....
...
.... ... .... .,, . , . .. ............ ... ... ..... ..... .... .... ....
This certification is based on information provided by the;recipient of this letter. ..
If, at a later date, this information is found to be incorrect, this letter will
become invalid, and any development occuring must cease until a coastal development
permit is obtained.
....
Charles Dam -
District Director
.. I. ..