Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPUD 03-05; CARLSBAD OFFICE PARK; Planned Unit Development - Non-Residential (PUD).,::: 1) D D D D D D D D D D ~~J D 2) 3) 4) • CITY OF CARLSBAD • LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES) {FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) Administrative Permit -2nd Dwelling Unit Administrative Variance Coastal Development Permit Conditional Use Permit Condominium Permit Environmental Impact Assessment General Plan Amendment Hillside Development Permit Local Coastal Plan Amendment Master Plan @ Planned Industrial Permit D Planning Commission Determination D Precise Development Plan D Redevelopment Permit D Site Development Plan [] Special Use Permit D Specific Plan D · Tentative Poreel Mop Obtain from Engineering Department ~.. Tentative Tract Map D Variance (FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY) Non-Residential Planned 0UDD3-05 Development D Zone Change Planned Development Permit ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: PROJECT NAME: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: D List other applications not specified Q. \ ~ -0 uz.\ -ZS- Lo...<\~'c~ ·c~~~ ?a... ..... ~ ::FJ \Je_. fwo-~+o~y o~~f ~_1vt~ Id; rvos. 11vi-t',.,\ fv'>r-k-in_' e71 J o'(l.,(. Jrw~wtt~. 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) r_., 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) r_ Af,2.L-S 6Alj> Co ~PoM-r"'c. ~ n' R / LP. c~~w~s~ Uevelo~_._-_en_t _______ ~--=~~o-~--~--\~~c~e~v_,_~-------- MAILING ADDRESS Sv-·,+e l OD CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE ZIP TELEPHONE cq4,q)'1&1 ,1~~ 5,z _::C~y_t_N_£~~~CA_-~_q_~_&_~_o~~~s-~~~~~-t-~~~~~l-~~-q_i_1>'1(;~"--~~~-~-o_o-i I I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. _/~~~ -~1-a5 .1 SIGNATURE DATE DATE 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~R.v ct:)03··-;;, 80 -"$ L.\ NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30 P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPLICATION BE FILED, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00 P.M. Form 16 /);) -f CJ PAGE 1 OF•2 ~-• 8) LOCATION OF PROJECT: ON THE BETWEEN 9) LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1 0) PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS itl 11) NUMBER OF EXISTING I ~, 12) PROPOSED NUMBER OF ~ RESIDENTIAL UNITS ~ RESIDENTIAL UNITS 13) TYPE OF SUBDIVISION 16) PERCENTAGE OF PROPOSED PROJECT IN OPEN SPACE 19) GROSS SITE ACREAGE 22) EXISTING ZONING I\N~ 114) 11.\t,l 17) 14 .02 I 20) jP\J\ 123) PROPOSED IND OFFICE/ r:::.:-::115) PROPOSED COMM SQUARE FOOTAGE ~ SQUARE FOOTAGE PROPOSED INCREASE IN I °170118) PROPOSED SEWER ADT USAGE IN EDU EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPOSED ZONING ~ 21) PROPOSED GENERAL ~ PLAN DESIGNATION 24) IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. I/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE ~~~4~---- SIGNATURE FOR CITY USE ONLY FEE COMPUTATION APPLICATION TYPE FEE REQUIRED TOT AL FEE REQUIRED DATE FEE PAID Form 16 MAY 1 2 2003 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT. DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED RECEIVED BY: RECEIPT NO. PAGE 2 OF 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT NAME: __ ...;:])=· ~,4_,.J...:;:J;.;..O_N;;_._;E~· N.;..;G;;;.:l.;..;N~IS;..:.5R-i~:..::N.Cat...-:!.;..;,N.;:.:C-:;:;..;,., ------ Please describe fully the proposed project. Include any det~ils necessary to aoec:.iate!y explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also ,ncluoe any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for. er appropriateness of, the applic~tion. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation. Lf4t, grre IS L,oC-A-tTe::t> ON -11+-6 No~..twe.s-r co<ZN6R. of CA-MINO V\bA tzogv&-4:Nb cofZ-rt:-.Pf:l~ NDGA-L, -m+6 p~o,S-6v'1 c.ON5i61'5 0-F SvtB t>P,-1 bLNG A j0E::.'Ger,J-p.y ,ApP(WV6-l> p~-aoe-··(, Of' .. FlVc. oF-F\0£. f;.LAli..btNG:S. f;AcH /9v!lL..DlNG IA,tl-i-.Bt-ON \"IS OWN \7A-f<..Gc-t,. WliH A (bt--,\tJ\ON 1.---AN't>SGA-P\NG A:Nt> PAfL/c.tNG (tr:.,f::A Fftf2...q;l-, ---CftB{0t:. (;..,1-1. . .-1_.. f;1c, oNe ?\2-IVEVvAY Ac<--ess off· c.oJZ--ns P6L-N6GAL w L-t+l- A·N e~\, {<..,£ .D/2-~Ve :rs:-u LooP .. Proj[)ee,:,tm, tity of ct.rlsbad I ii Fi ,1,11 ,i· I •JJ ·f i ;4, iiJ ,ii DISCLOSURE ST A TEME!\TT ~pplic~n(s stat~ment or disclosure of :enain ov.:nersh1p mterests on all_ applications which will require 1 , d1screuonary action on the pan of the City Council or any appointed Board. Commission or Commmee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submmal. Your proJect cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as "Any individual,-finn, co-partnership, joint venture, assoc1at1on, social club. fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate. in this and any other county. city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. 2. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporat10n or partnership. mclude the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SH.ARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publiclv-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) Person ,, [tM S:k~~-ri_ Title __ ..... V .... , ._P_. -------Title -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- Address S<;15 &:. ~ ~(» 6(.VO.Address 6°i.E-£, 't.of;fA L1NDA. B<-vb. ~Vcl-r< 2&" ,;f. Z,D'Z.. ,.:, "If). /,_ • • , i--h ,.., A q ~ 0-~ fl./t'c.eW'ftAr I Ck-, Z.~?o ft.--Jl:Ck•", \re '--'~ . tA::> r~· OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (NIA) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) (v-rl>hcu{ (o .. 1.v;:;.fe {,~ .. fe,1 if ~/. . ;.-. .,....,. ! " ..... ~' Person t;;;chaa1 I ?~?i~t.:., CI,tb Jfl Corp/Part -ft.el;! fbGS,=re, h:I I If' i(tO!"/vfE ... .''~~ Title &@,;,r?.-/ /aiD1.r-r Title _______________ _ Address c;e::;o D Tr.;r.J," .f £,;. . 5 .... Je /Ou Address 5£.-;c:c> "-"r-RA$\d.:D ,@..t>, .S vi' l Pc, :,z . .-, r .. c.1· --,; • ., ~ rV~ . /._ <( • 1 t--t; l. V I 1635 Faraday Avenue• Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 @ 3. NO~-PROFIT O~'lZATIO~ OR TRCST If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above 1s a nonprofit orgamzat1on or 3 trust. l1s: 1nc names and addresses of A.1'fi' person serving as an officer or director of the non-pror11 organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. Non Profit/Trust Non Profit·Trust ----------~ Title ____________ _ Title ---------------- Address -----------~ Address ---------~-~--- 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of Cny staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (:12) months: D Yes ~o If yes, pl~ase indicate person(s): ______________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my lmowledge. ·, ____ ,,..,,----,,--.... ~---~---"-? __ .,,_/c.._· --~~---;J--_:_ ... _) ?/t-=-; :/ -·-, ~ --:' 1,,.-L--:._..~ L Signature of owner/date I -Signature of applicant/date ·~ >., )1 IH ~-ti .~";'-"")'L Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent -~· H:ADMIN\COUNTER\DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 05/02/2003 08:32 7144299593 BOUR~~IUN D~V~LUf-'Mt:.N .. -.;j:;~,1, ~ .. ~.1402.92 ORDER NO. 1283514-22 \•.:,, -~~i"e' :. )lf,?:'l) ...... ,.A.ETA OWNER'S POUCY WE.STERN REGIONAL 'EXCEPTlONS MF SCHEDULE A POLICY NO. 12835 I 4-22 AMOUNT OF TNSURANCE $2,504,056.00 PREMIUM $2,253.00 DATE OF POLICY: OCTOBER 31, 2002 AT 11:40 A.M. I. NAME OF INSURED: CARLSBAD CORPORA TE CENTER, L.P. 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST rN THE LAND INSURED HEREIN JS: AFEE 3. TITLE TO THE ESTA TE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND IS VESTED IN: CARLSBAD CORPORA TE CENTER, L..P. 4. THE LAND REF.ER.RED TO IN TI-US POLICY IS DESCRIBED AS FOL.LOWS: SEE EXHIBIT ''I" ATTACHED HERETO PAG,E 1 05/02/2003 08:3~ e-· .. ·t ~. 1402.92 ORDER NO . .1283514-22 '-.{~\..• 1)9'-l) ""·•·, ... ··A'LtK"owNER ·s .POLICY WESTERN REGIONAL .EXCEPTIONS SCffEDULEB THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE (AND 11-lE COMPANY WILL NOT PAY COSTS, ATTORNEYS' FEES OR EXPENSES) WHICH AR1S£ BY REASON Of: PARTO.NE: I. TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS WHJCH ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LJENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY 11-IAT LEVlES TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTEREST, OR CLA1MS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT WHICH COULD BE ASCERTAINED 'BY AN .INSPECTION OF SAID LAND OR BY MAKING INQUIRY OF PERSONS IN POSSESSION THEREOF. 3. EASEMENTS, CLAIMS OF EASEMENT OR ENCUMBRANCES WHICH ARE· NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. . . 4. DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORT AGE IN A.REA, ENCROACHMENTS, OR ANY OTHER FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY WOULD D1SCLOSE, AND WHICH ARE NOT SJ-JOWN BY PUBLlC RECORDS. S. (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR TN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C) WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT THE MATTERS EXCEPTED UNDER (A), (B) OR (C) ARE SHOWN BY TIIE PUBLlC RECORDS. 6. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHI' TO A LIEN., FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL THERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IM.POSED BY LAW AND; NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. PAltTTWO: 1. GENERA.LAND SPECIAL TAXES fOR THE FISCAL YEAR2002-2003, FIRST INSTALLMENT: $5,482.18 FIRST JNSTALLMENT DELINQUENT. SECOND INSTALLMENT: $4,983.80 NOT YET DELINQUENT. COD.E AREA: 09018. A.P. NO.: 213-061-25-00. 2. THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.5 COMMENCING WlTH SECTION 75 OF THE CALlFORNJA REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. 3. SAID LAND LIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SPECIAL TAX ASSESSMENT DlSTRJCT(S) CREATED BYA "COMMUNllY FACILITIES DISTRICT" MAP RECORDED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF TIJE MELLO-ROOS ACT (STREETS AND HIGHWAY CODE SECTION 3100, ET SEQ.) OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE LEGISLATURE PAGE2 .OUUr<:C.:::> I Ul'l L/C. V C.L.U,J•IC:.l'i --' •• 1402.92 ORDER NO. l2835l4-22 1.!,Jfl) .~ .. · .. Iii..·· ·x: OWNER'S POLICY WESTERN REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS NOTE: UPON OFFlClAL FORMATION, POTENTIAL ADD1Tl0NAL TAX£S MAY BE AUTI-IORIZED AND LEVIED BY THE DlSTRICT WJ-lICH MAY BE INCORPORATED INTO THE REGULAR PROPERTY TAX B.TLL AND MADE A PART OF THE GENERAL TAX COLL£CT10N PROCESS. 4. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, ASSESSMENTS, LIENS, CHARGES, TERMS AND PROVISIONS IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER l, 1974 AS FILE NO. 74-263897 Of OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH PROVIDE THAT A VIOLATION THEREOF SHALL Nor DEFEAT OR RENDER INV AUD THE LIEN OF ANY FIRST MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST MADE IN GOOD F AlTH AND FOR VALUE, BUT DELETING ANY COVENANT, CONDITION OR RESTRICTION 1ND1CATING A .PREFERENCE, LIMITATION OR DISCRIMINATJON BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, HANDICAP, fAMJ.LIAL STATIJS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN TO THE EXTENT SUCH COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR R.ESTRJCTIONS VIOLATE 42 U.S.C. SECTION 3604(c) OR CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12955. LAWFUL RESTRICTIONS UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW ON THE AGE OF OCCUPANTS IN SENlOR HOUSING OR HOUSING FOR OLDER PERSONS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS RESTRICTIONS BASED ON FAMILIAL STATUS. NOTE 1: A DOCUMENT DECLARING MODIFICA TlONS TiiEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1974 AS FILE NO. 74-337587; JUNE 1, 1977 AS FILE NO. 77-212678; AND JUNE 27, 1977 AS FILE NO. 77-252979, ALL OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 5. 1"HE FOLLOWING RECITAL CONTAJNED ON MAP NO. 10062: NOTE.: THIS MAP HAS BEEN APPROVE UPON Tl{E EXPRESS CONDITION THAT BUILDING PERMITS SHALL NOT BE ISSUED FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT WITI-ON THIS FINAL MAP UNTU. THE CIJY MANAGER DETERMINES Tf.lA T SEWER SERVJCE IS AV Ail,ABLE FOR SUCH DEVELOPMENT. 6. AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INClDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED AUGUST 10, 1981 AS FILE NO. 81-252845 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. GRANTED TO: SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY. AFFECTS: THE SOUTIIWESTERLY 50.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEASTERLY 90.00 FEET OF THE SOUTIIEASTERL Y 8.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 4. 7_ THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE .DOCUMENT ENTITLED "AGREEMENT", EXECUIBD BY AND BETWEEN KROC, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ("KRDC"), PALOMAR TR!AD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ("PALOMAR"), AND GUY W. MCROSKEY, RECORDED APRIL 18, 1994 AS FILE NO. 1994-0253551 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PAGE3 ~uu~~~IUN V~V~LU/-'Ml:.N --. . • 1402.92 ORDERN0.1283514~22 :~:·.: , ... ~!.~) , .... ,. AElA' OWNERtS POLICY WESTERN REGIONAL EXCEPTIONS THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT .ENTITLED "AN ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF RIGHTS AND OBLlGA TIONS UNDER AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE REAL PROPERTY AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT", EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN GUY W. MCROSKEY ("ASSlGNOR"), AND GDC GROUP, lNC .• A CALIFORNIA CORPOMTION, RECORDED APRll. 18, 1994 AS F.lLE NO. 1994- 0253552 OF OFFlCIAL RECORDS. THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED lN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT'', EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN PALOMAR TRIAD, .lNC.., AND CARLSBAD ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED AUGUS1' 31, 1994 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1994-0523 t 02 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 8. THE EFFECT, IF ANY, OF RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 14523, WHICH SETS FORTH, OR PURPORTS TO SET FORTH. CERTAIN DIMENSIONS AND BE.A RINGS Of THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY. 9. THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED 1N THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "NOTICE OF RESTRJCTION ON REAL PROPER TY" RECORDED OCTOBER 18, 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2002-0913317 OF OFFlCIAL RECORDS. 10. A DEED OF TRUST TO SECURE AN INDEBTEDNESS OF $6,750,000.00, .RECORDED OCTOBER 31, 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2002.0965824 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. DATED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2002. TRUSTOR: CARLSBAD CORPORA TE CENTER, LP., A CALIFORNlA LIMITED PARJNERSHIP. TRUSTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE lNSURANCE COMPANY. BENEFICIARY: CITY NATIONAL BANK, A NAilONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION. PAGE4 BOURESTON DEVELOPMEN PAGE 06 -·-· .1402.92 ORDER NO. 1283514-22 .. ·V.~ ·AE:'fA OWNER•s POLICY WESTERN REGJONA.L EXCEPTIONS EXHIBlT "l" BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 4 OF CITY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 80-34, lN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DlJ:,GO, ST A TE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 10062, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON APRIL IS, 19&1 AS FILE NO. !H~J15130 OF OFFlCIAL RECORDS, ALSO BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL ''B" OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED APRIL&, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86-136023 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGlNNJNG AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 4 OF SAfD MAP NO. 10062; TIIENCE ALONG TRE SOUTHEASTERLY, SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4 THE FOLLOWING: sourn 32904'22" WEST, 421.99 FEET TO THE BEGrNNING Of A TANGENT 25.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO WE NORTH; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°59'24" A DISTANCE OF 39.27 FEET; THENCE NORTH S7°56' 14" WEST, 225.67 FEET TO TI-IE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 8 I 9.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH.EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CEN1RAL ANG.LE OF 06°09'51" A DISTANCE OF 88.11 FEET; TIIENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 4, NORTH 24°18'281' EAST, 70.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1I00S'2l" EAST, 66.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 32°04':22" EAST, 375.00 FEET TO A POINT ON TIIE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 OF SAID MAP NO. 10062; TI-fENCE ALQNG Ttffi NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAJD LOT 1 AND ll·IE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4, SOUTH 48°00'28" EAST. 377.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LAND IS FURTHER SHOWN AND DESClU:BED AS: PARCEL B OF THAT CERTAIN BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, BY AND BETWEEN PALOMAR TRIAD, INC. AND KRDC, INC., AS OWNERS, APPROVED AND ACC.EPTED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON MARCH 4, 1994 AND RECORDED IN ll·IB OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ON MARCH 7, l 994 AS FILE NO. 1994- 0150371 OF OfFICrAL RECORDS. FEBRUARY 04, l()02 I :32 PM OM PAG£5 .LI ~ L 2 Y) e ~ n SHT.3 D n ,... :",I ;:r 4.H AC ;:r l:J!I I ... @]> • :",I S,N DICtO CQ."tT Y) ~ll'SIIV D -213Na08 S) \~ i, . ..... . : ... ..... ~' 9 5 © " 7 © ASETO ,fJf.l.Z. 11 @ 4.l~AC. ,1~,.1.1. @ ro \.1 ~- .. ., MA?l0062-CARLS8AD TRACT N0.80-34 MAP1006I-CARLS8AD TRACT N0.80-33 ROS14523 . 213-06 1"·200' • PLEASE NOTE: Time limits on·the processing of discretionary projects established by state law do not start until a project application is deemed complete by the City. The City has 30 calendar days from the date of application submittal to determine whether an application is complete or incomplete. Within 30 days of submittal of this application you will receive a letter stating whether this application is complete or incomplete. If it is incomplete, the letter will state what is needed to make this application complete. When the application is complete, the processing period will sta·rt upon the date of the completion letter. Applicant Si·gnature: A~ ?~.£&4----: Staff Signature: --C-.,... /---------------.---- Date:· 5"'-7 --:-0 > To be stapled with receipt to application Copy for f i 1 e ----- PARKING STALL LEGEND LEGEND o---{J LIGHT POLE 0 0 DETEClOA CHECK ASSfMRLY •••••••• ACCESSIF!L[ PATH or TRAVfl • DOMESTIC WATEA 8ACl<fl0W PAf\/ENTEA AND WATEA METfR OECORAllVf ARCHll[CfUAAI I !(;HT FIXIURf t-,.,t ____ __, t -....-:..-~1 -,,k orr1c[ B BUl!OING OFFICE E BUILDING ,,; 1 r ~ I I J ·----c::e,::,,"'·'" i PARTIAL SITE PLAN 0\ '---~~~'-----"'-~// ___ ;-________ _ C" _1' ' '-·~::_: ., . --+-·"'--------- A All DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCFIEIE F SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR Pl.ANTING /\NO WAll F/\CE QF CONCRFTE CUA.0. P?OP€P.l'< IRA.IG>\l10N llNF OR CENfERllNF OF <>ARYING STALL SHll>'ING, UNO B PROVIDE POSITIVE OJ:IAINAGE AWAY FROM G SEE ELf:CTRICAl DRAWINGS FOR SITE tlGHTING REOUIRFMENfS 8UILDING Slff CIVIL QP;AWINGS M ACCESS DRIVEWAYS WILL BE DESK>NE"D PER C FOR sire GRADING. PAVING. STi:tlP!NG THE CITV OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS DRAIN.AGE UltLITIES. ANO HQRIZONTAl ALL OUTDOOR UGKTINO SHALL BE DESIGNED CONTROL DIMENSIONS SEf CIVIL ORAW!NGS AND tNSlAtLED SO TKAT ALL DIRECT RAYS ARE CONFINED TO THE sne AND fHAT 0 SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR POINT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE LIIIIITED TO CONNECTIONS TO OFF.SITE IJHLITIES THE HOURS OF 700 AM TO DUSK WEEl<DAYS CONTRACTOR TO VERll'Y ACTUAL UTILITY LOCATIONS J A PIPE WILL "lOT SE BUILT THf:IOUGH OR 01/ER THE STREET HEDGE FROM THE 8ACKFLOW E CONCRETE WALKS SHALL RECEIVE EXPANSION PREVENTERS TO THE LOOP ROAD WHERE ~g:~~~ :~ ~5 ~O OOCC :~~~~~ /:,;~~N°s~~ROL APPUC~~ JOINT'.,. LINO K REFER TO SHEET A91 FOR FIRE~~~ 1 ASS~:_._~~-~-~ , PARklNG $PACE REQUIREMENTS ZONED PM (PLANNED INDVSHllAI ! I SPACE/250 Sf GROSS AREA 148.730 I 2501 TOTAL REQUIRED -------;--195~- 2 ACCESSl0LE P/\AKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS UBC SECTION !1299. TABLE 119-1 ACCESSIBLE 1301 600 SPACES! 8 SPACES VAIi/ ACCESSIBLE 1/8 ACCESSIBLE SPACES NOTE All AD.-.. ACCESSIBLE PARklNG SPACES /\RE TO BE JD!'NTlftFD BY RFOUIRED SIR1PING AND SIGN/\Of:. 1 PARKING SPAU" D1SfRIHl>Ti0'l ~19,1<,1 B STANDARD 18 ~ ,nn C COMPACT I~ 115 25'1. MAX I O ACCESSIEll( !!~ ,1q) F. VANAo.::rsSIBLFm·,1q1 •STANDARD NQf tfSS T<-1AN <'>% 'Jr All <,1i•Jr1i;-,r, ',PA',f', NOTES THIS NOif LIST APPLlfS TO <:;HffJ A1! Qf\JLY ('.) ~~~~UA~I\~ pp:~~~ W~~~N~t .. ~~HCOllltl ADDED COLOR CG !1 AOOtif TAN BY SCHOFIElD !CHAOM~ /\[)MIXIIJAFI {JJ CONCRETE CURB RAMP SH CIVIL OWG'> CD ~~ ... )~~~0 ;i:i1Ng(rc~~=~"11 srr or1A11 8 LANDSCAPING SU LANOSCAPf DRAWINGS (D CONCRETE cuAB sre c,1111 OAAWING.S CT) PROPERTY t1Nf srr c1v11 DflAWINGs (_,J ~~T~~~~~NbAA~l~G~V~\:~~ ~IRF "SLUE REFLECflYF MARKER IN THI' AOAO INDICATING HYOAANI LOCATION Fon All EXISTING AND PROPOSED HYQRANlS f'fP rtRf DEPARTMENT STANDARD CD ~~~r'!~~!ls~~~~u~l o;:~1;<;~~~ov1m CD ~-f~~1~u~~~~ tvrnmnr I Yl'fCAt srr 0 :~::~iRN;~~~~~~ ~~Tf~ p;:~E~~ID P/\!NTED GALV M(TAI GATF 11/A!ll CB LINE OF CANOPY AB0Vf (ll) 0 CURB FOR HANOlf AP ACCF.S<; ~rf --: CIVIL DRAWINGS GD ~~NNCR~~:rz~~F~MAAL: ';",li\~;~;:t flNl<;H C~iJ ~~~~S:e~~Mf~=o Wll;fl 1rr~::;Rl~;t1 DR/\WINGS c~ ;;/c:l~S~f~~ ~~~:i;~~Nlt~f O~~[A ?i~l~AII 0 ~4'':A~'j0 r!1~T~~i:,ci' ,}i'ft~ e:r~F.gt~::LY IIIOUNTEO FAG!NG THf Dlflf:Cl10N 01 TRAVEt ANO CLEARl.Y VISlf!l[ TO ONCOMING !RAI F!C fNffPING THE DESIGNATED AREA ',l(lN<; <;HAL! Rf Of A DURABLE MAlfRIIIL AN[) INSTAL(Ffl Prl< GUIDFUNES f OR SIGN MOUNTIN(, ('!) :i;~E~~N~ A~~i/1 SH;i~Jl~ ~;~~~D 0',H/\ SIIFF.lY Rf{) TIRf I ANf N:) PARVIN(, SHALL BE PAINff:.I..J ON TOP OF f:VRB IN WHITE LET!FfllNG 1 IN(;HrS HIGH AND SHAU Bf SPACED .lO {) 0,, ffNIFR rm r-0R110N lHEfltOI 1•:rr111m qo1 urc 1'!'!61 SFE OF fAlt )~ !A11 OD ~1:L\;r.R~~!~fil/~)/,Mn~, :;i~'rT~,~~~t,· I< LANDSCAPIIJr. . (,,] CJ;) tA~~i~~·~l~f ~.~~:~: .• t:,f,_'' ;, Ci~! ~':ir~1;i:'.;','i, y ••PFRC[NfA(;I 'Jr T~JT A\ PAl'li<ltl'", ',>'~';f'. L----------------------------------------------~-------' D z ,c( ..J Q. w ... iii II! ~: ... ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM-PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT) CASE NO: ------DATE: ------- BACKGROUND 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. CASE NAME: C,{\tz,vSfb.f.\l>-o.f'f-'lGf_ "PA:!!..k. cA12..1._,S BA\> CO~Po AA1·e CsNTt;,'<: , i.-P. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS~/o Bou.e.cs-rvN To vewP./vleJi"" 550o -r,<?..ABt,1CO ~ S:t,tl--Q: 101" ,:C:t:,ilJ~ C-A qi.cu2t:. CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: "i<-IC~l\'2P T. Bo1A!<'...G-s10N (94-q)3~7'-fh05 PROJECT LOCATION: Ot.J --r-l-1-~ NW eofl...Nt>IZ OF C-A-k1N'O V11::A Roe.i,t;. ANl> C..Oe-r-c:: ~ No6A-'l...- PROJECT SPONSOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS: VAN-JON b~G.~NloEtz-.tNG. :ftJc. 8'15 t-, t{o~ C1N.l)A. l3i,,V1>. Svt1,-r-e:. ?-O'J- GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: t'1...ANN5p .:'.!NblA..()1.e-1-A.L ~E:: 8. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (i.e., permits, financing approval or participation agreements): ---------------- 9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: Ct>N~-re;11.v-rv0N OF TIV£ eif-Fic:,c B,\,qi..,t::-1Nc; s !Ll"ftt CoNVet-rrioNA:\.-S'1.--A.S-of'i ... Gt?A-l>c, fo\ANbAc""f\.ON ~1'.i;M, .::C"'r w1u. +\.A\/€ .Asf'HAL--r/wNUlG-r6 P1\~MENT+i:>R PA-t.,JoNG A{\/t, \.l-ltRt>SvA-~ ANt:> lAl\l~cAf'IN C=>. "Tl4~ l,{Ai.;1-f;;t€. ONG, .l>R,.l b6Wl\;'f • -,:J.H:; SI~ 1.s ~A~ me P-AwMA-~ ldf'.-Poe:..-r -A,,Jl> StTlAA-,Gl> 1N .ft e,wsiNE=ss fA-a, -r~ Sr,~ \S UNJ~·Nt~l> ANl> tM5 5-GE:N ff:.Evl<>'vl-g'l.,\J M,,kSS b~i:;:,,, ~ s~ \S ~~4-.l>-BY GM~.t> sz.,of'ES ~ ?--·, I 1,{.A-m-It: J\.1.-A-.x1JAuwl ~ IG..tt' Of' ~o 1, 4'1'16 S10f6 s -1\(lG u-, ve~ 1,v,-m-I t::.,r-. \GA:---rGt> t.A:N t>.sc+-Ft;.1> V-6Gt-T-A-nctJ wrm .hfl.Al,N-AGG 'SWAU:;;S ii;> (UN"rf-c,1-S'IA~Aot {t.WJOf':[. s. \IB ts: Co\J6/Ujl:> \v\11:\ S.r~SG-VBSST-A:--rtvN ftNl> -k f#'x I Mv1M ~. Of". -f'-IJ..-L Of A-f:,ovt,, ~ \ ::fttc:::r:, 1 Rev. 07/26/02 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," or "Potentially Significant Impact Uniess Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. D Aesthetics D Agricultural Resources D Air Quality D Biological Resources D Cultural Resources D Geology/Soils 0Noise D Hazards/Hazardous Materials D Population and Housing D Hydrology/Water Quality D Land Use and Planning D Mineral Resources D Mandatory Findings of Significance 2 D Public Services D Recreation D Transportation/Circulation D Utilities & Service Systems Rev. 07/26/02 i ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not significantly adverse, and the impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significantly adverse. • Based on an "EIA-Part I", if a proposed project could have a potentially significant adverse effect on the environment, but all potentially significant adverse effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required. • When "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant adverse effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant adverse effect on the environment. • If there are one or more potentially significant adverse effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce adverse impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. 3 Rev. 07 /26/02 • An EIR !!!!!fil be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant adverse effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant adverse impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the adverse impact to less than significant; or ( 4) through the EIA-Part I analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts, which would otherwise be determined significant. 4 Rev. 07/26/02 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) I. AESTHETICS -Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light and glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTRAL RESOURCES -(In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model-1997 prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the ex1stmg environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY -(Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? 5 Potentially Significant Jmpact D D D D D D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant No Impact Impact 0. D D D D D D D D Rev. 07/26/02 ,\ . - Issues (and Supporting Inform!n Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by California Department offish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? t) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? g) Impact tributary areas that are environmentally sensitive? 6 Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D .otentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D No Impact Rev. 07/26/02 l, Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be refened to and attached.) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -Would the project: a) Cause a substantial -adverse change m the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the sign.ifi- cance of an archeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy ·a unique paleontologi- cal resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those intened outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soils, as defined in Table 18 -1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? 7 Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant No Impact Impact D D D D D D D D D D D Rev. 07/26/02 Issues (and Supporting Inform'" Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) e) Have soils incapable of adequately suppo1iing the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or environment? e) For a project within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? 8 Potentially Significant lmpact D D D D D D D D D D 'tentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D Rev. 07/26/02 No Impact .. e Issues (and Supporting Information Sources) . (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with ground water recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local ground water table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Impacts to groundwater quality? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off- site? e) .Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the flow rate or amount (volume) of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off- site? f) Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? h) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? i) Place within 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? k) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 1) Increased erosion (sediment) into receiving surface waters. m) Increased pollutant discharges ( e.g., heavy metals, pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic organics, nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances and trash) into receiving surface waters or other alteration of receiving surface water quality ( e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? 9 Potentially Sign1ficant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D 'tentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D No Impact Rev. 07 /26/02 . e Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) n) Changes to receiving water quality (marine, fresh or wetland waters) during or following construction? o) Increase in any pollutant to an already impaired water body as listed on the Clean Water Act Section 303( d) list? p) The exceedance of applicable surface or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? IX. LANDUSE AND PLANNING -Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? · X. MINERAL RESOURCES -Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? XI. NOISE -Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbourne vibration or groundboume noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 10 Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D ltotentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D Rev. 07/26/02 No Impact Issues (and Supporting lnforrna'n Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING -Would the project: a) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension ofroads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction ofreplacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction ofreplacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, a need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, m order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? v) Other public facilities? XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project neighborhood and recreational facilities deterioration of the accelerated? increase the use of existing regional parks or other such that substantial physical facility would occur or be 11 Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D tltotentialJy Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D Rev. 07/26/02 No Impact Issues (and Supporting Informa~on Sources). (Supplemental documents may be refe1red to and attached.) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in insufficient parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation ( e.g., bus turn- outs, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS -Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 12 Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D .,otentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D D D D D D D Less Than Significant Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D Rev. 07/26/02 No Impact ,) . e Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). (Supplemental documents may be referred to and attached.) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumula- tively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects?) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? xvrn. EARLIER ANALYSES Potentially Significant Impact D D D D D D tlttentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated D D D D D D Less Than Significant Impact D / D D D D D No Impact Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program BIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier BIR or negative declaration. Section 15063( c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 13 Rev. 07/26/02 • ~'. e e DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AIR QUALITY-Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Impact. The project site is located in the San Diego Air Basin which is a federal and state non-attainment area for ozone (03), and a state non-attainment area for paiticulate matter less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter (PM10). The periodic violations of national Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB), particularly for ozone in inland foothill areas, requires that a plan be developed outlining the pollution controls that will be undertaken to improve air quality. In San Diego County, this attainment planning process is embodied in the Regional Air Quality Strategies (RAQS) developed jointly by the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) and the San Diego Association of Governments (SAND AG). A plan to meet the federal standard for ozone was developed in 1994 during the process of updating the 1991 state- mandated plan. This local plan was combined with plans from all other California non-attainment areas having serious ozone problems and used to create the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP was adopted by the Air Resources Board (ARB) after public hearings on November 9th through 10th in 1994, and was forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. After considerable analysis and debate, particularly regarding airsheds with the worst smog problems, EPA approved the SIP in mid-1996. The proposed project relates to the SIP and/or RAQS tln·ough the land use and growth assumptions that are incorporated into the air quality planning document. These growth assumptions are based on each city's and the County's general plan. If a proposed project is consistent with its applicable General Plan, then the project presumably has been anticipated with the regional air quality planning process. Such consistency would ensure that the project would not have an adverse regional air quality impact. Section 15125(B) of the State of California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains specific reference to the need to evaluate any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable air quality management plan. Transpo1tation Co_ntrol Measures (TCMs) are part of the RAQS. The RAQS and TCM plan set forth the steps needed to accomplish attainment of state and federal ambient air quality standards. The California Air Resources Board provides criteria for deternlining whether a project conforms with the RAQS which include the following: • Is a regional air quality plan being implemented in the project area? • Is the project consistent with the growth assumptions in the regional air quality plan? The project area is located in the San Diego Air Basin, and as such, is located in an area where a RAQS is being implemented. The project is consistent with the growth assumptions of the City's General Plan and the RAQS. Therefore, the project is consistent with the regional air quality plan and will in no way conflict or obstruct implementation of the regional plan. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Less Than Significant Impact. The closest air quality monitoring station to the project site is in the City of Oceanside. Data available for this monitoring site through April, 2002 indicate that the most recent air quality violations recorded were for the state one hour standard for ozone (one day in both 2000 and 2001) and one day in 2001 for the federal 8-hour average for ozone and one day for the 24-hour state standard for suspended particulates in 1996. No violations of any other air quality standards have been recorded recently. If there is grading associated with the project, the project would involve minimal short-term emissions associated with grading and construction. Such emissions would be minimized tln·ough standard construction measures such as the use of properly tuned equipment and watering the site for dust control. Long-term emissions associated with travel to and from the project will be minimal. Although air pollutant emissions would be associated with the project, they would neither result in the violation of any air quality standard (comprising only an incremental contribution to overall air basin quality readings), nor contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Any impact is assessed as less than significant. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? 14 Rev. 07/26/02 J" . ..... Less Than Significant Impac~he Air Basin is currently in a non-attainment lne for. ozone and suspended fine particulates. The proposed project would represent a contribution to a cumulatively considerable potential net increase in emissions throughout the air basin. As described above, however, emissions associated with the proposed project would be minimal. Given the limited emissions potentially associated with the proposed project, air quality would be essentially the same whether or not the proposed project is implemented. According to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 (a)(4), the proposed project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considered de minimus. Any impact is assessed as less than significant. EARLIER ANALYSIS USED AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES The following documents were used in the analysis of this project and are on file in the City of Carlsbad Planning Department located at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California, 92008. 1. Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the City of Carlsbad General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01). City of Carlsbad Planning Department. March 1994. 15 Rev. 07/26/02