The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPUD 06-12A; Robertson Ranch PA 16; Planned Development - Major Subdivision (PD)• • CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION FORM FOR CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION APPLICATION CITY USE ONLY Project Number: PROJECT NAME: Assessor's Parcel Number(s): 1 ~<Is .. 'b 1 c __ :)__ 5 . 1 l(o <( -37D -Lf :::L .1 flo~ · 3 r 0 -3 j Description of proposal (add attachment if necessary): C..~~.<...<f --fk ~ ~~t:.v...!'Vt.~ 'P le--±fv::) Lo+ s-f ~(MC, lA~ t-o lYe..~·, Lo-\-5'7 fr(!'W,_ ?:J& ~ ~~c.... Lo~ L}i{ ~~ \C..... -tc 3C-, G..cle~·s-~-< '~ ; o..pft=cDJe d C.oq:l1a.rdl tlfA..-L c+.s L Would you like to orally present your proposal to your assigned staff planner/engineer? Yes D No t'8l Please list the staff members you have previously spoken to regarding this project. If none, please so state. C~v\s Gav-c..ic._ OWNER NAME (Print): '1Sc-oo~'e_~._~ j2c,~..-\sm_ f)\$olU_ MAILING ADDRESS: \.2-S&S f-t.>1 r...~b~ .. lMg.ru '1)..1-1..2D6 CITY, STATE, ZIP: $e.{ N\o.r C.\ "].;1.o 1J TELEPHONE: ( ~5~) Lf <5/-& 5 C 0 EMAIL ADDRESS: 4-MgL 11&r'?~X_(~\cilw.w;_cQ.41... *Owner's signature indicates permission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal. APPLICANT NAME (Print)~obf-dd W Ma_.r'Bifik{kr..:( c.. MAILING ADDRESS: \2 ~~S" fh~k \.d M4-r(J'Py=i"-..,).()() CITY, STATE, ZIP: W M.JJ . .f cJs '/'dOl '=f. TELEPHONE: ( g:_s&")'7'1tf-(o ( ::2..(&, EMAIL ADDRESS: -\lMC..k u}-P bt?'<..+.-..Jd k~. . c~ I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND C ECT TO THE ST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ..:3-3 -(:::L DATE PLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE (Print): --re_ _ _._,...._r_,_', .......... &-=...:..~~lt-'\..._------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: S.O...VW 0-s. ~tl..€... CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL ADDRESS: I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND COR CT TO THE BES.y'i OF MY KNOWLEDGE. \ . . f--3 ' 3 -I ;,.._. DATE IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF TO INSPECT AND ENT TH PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. 1/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. tlfl' OPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE F REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: -~ lo(u ~I 2. ~ ·l ()._ RECEIVEDBY: ~~-~~-~~~~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- P-16 Page 2 of 2 Revised 07/10 Brookfield Homes .ieldHomes A member of Brookfield Residential 12865 Pointe Del Mar, Suite 200 Del Mar, CA 92014 March 7, 2012 Chris Garcia City of Carlsbad 1634 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Consistency Determination PUD 06-12 Dear Mr. Garcia: Tel: 85.8500 Fax: 858.259.6975 www.brookfieldhomes.com We are requesting a Consistency Determination to approve the following changes to ourPUD: 1) Lot 44: Replace Plan 1 C with a 3C 2) Lot 52: Revise 2A courtyard as approved previously 3) Lot 54: Replace Plan JAR with lXCR 4) Lot 57: Replace Plan 3A with !XC We are still seeing a strong demand for the IX plan and can't keep them "on the shelf'. We would like to meet buyer demand by increasing the number of IX plans available to them. We have not been able to sell the Plan 1 and have a number of them in inventory. Although not every Jot needed to be changed, the domino effect causes surrounding houses to be replotted when a plan type or elevation is changed on one or two. Please see the attachments for further clarification. Thank you for your consideration and please let me know if I can provide any additional information for your reference. Sincerely, ~ROOKFIELD HOMEJ .~ ( --~~ /:;-~·.~--A.~{ ' TeriMcHugh Director of Planning .... • • City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 IIMIIIM 11~1111111111111~ IIIII ~~ Applicant: BROOKFIELD DEL MAR BUILDERS INC Description Amount CD120003 663.00 3530 BUCK RIDGE AV CBAD Receipt Number: R0088708 Transaction ID: R0088708 Transaction Date: 03/08/2012 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 663.00 Transaction Amount: 663.00 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1206801-2 03/08/2012 98 Thu, Mar 08, 2012 02:55 PM Receipt Ref Nbr: R1206801-2/0035 PERMITS -PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 120680102 0035 0041 Trans/Rcpt#: R0088708 SET #: CD120003 Amount: Item Subtota 1 : Item Tot a 1 : ITEM(S) TOTAL: Check (Chk# 571654) Total Received: Have a nice day! 1 @ $663.00 $663.00 $663.00 $663.00 $663.00 $663.00 • **************CUSTOMER COPY************* • CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION FORM FOR CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION APPLICATION CITY USE ONLY Project Number: PROJECT NAME: Assessor's Parcel Number(s): Description of proposal (add attachment if necessary): $ee ~cL-c\ hc..l.)yl,Ui.J,.l.._-k._f\OlA....- Would you like to orally present your proposal to your assigned staff planner/engineer? Yes 0 No ~ Please list the staff members you have previously spoken to regarding this project. If none, please so state. UV\.~~<;; r\.J.._c..t sc; a-~ ~ r . She.\~~ <;l~lt\.()V...) 1 b 0\J\. "-Se...u c_lo.-.A.L c_~w.__ OWNER NAME (Printf~·eo~~ OJ'-\)~ lt, ~C.. MAILING ADDRESS: \2~(t,s '£3,~~ \...v.__~....-~ ~o CITY, STATE, ZIP: ~l i'\(\.o.f' cA az ~ \tf TELEPHONE: (9; ~~")'-{ ~ (-~ 6oo EMAIL ADDRESS: :\ VV\~\.u.J--0''-"-Q bmo\.£--eJ..~G, c <!V1-... *Owner's signature indicates permission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal. I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY. OWL GE. 4~ (t{. /( DATE APPLICANT NAME (Print)]3roo\cS-(-ci_c{ k( Mac~ lc~~ MAILING ADDRESS:___;~~=VltU-...;...._ ________ _ CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: (~c::;:r..'){qi.f-&; {'2-to EMAIL ADDRESS: -\"W\~lu..LA!? \orcc .. k .. -C-eJd h<SWg.s; .. ~ c~ I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND COR T TO THE B ST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. "{ -1 s--{I ~c.. DATE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE (Print): --.~\oloo-c:.....l.r-'~'--"k__,c.....="-U--t"'-=J'r-------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: Sc,...v\L.II- CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL ADDRESS: RECEIVED APR 2 2 2011 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF TO INSPECT AND ENTE HE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. IMIE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. 1/& If Y: FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: RECEIVED BY: P-16 Page 2 of 2 Revised 07/10 --DAOOKFIELD HOMES SAN DIEGO RIVERSIDE 12865 Pointe Del Mar Suite 200 Del Mar CA 92014-3859 Phone 858.481.8500 Fax 858.793.2395 www. braakfieldhames. cam April21, 2011 Chris Garcia City of Carlsbad 1634 Faraday A venue Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Consistency Determination PUD 06-12 Dear Mr. Garcia: We are requesting a Consistency Determination to approve the following changes to ourPUD: I) Lot 160: Replace Plan 2CR with 3AR 2) Lot 162: Replace Plan 3AR with 3CR 3) Lot 186: Replace Plan 2A with 1 B 4) Lot 187: Replace Plan IB with IXA 5) Lot 188: Replace Plan 3A with 3B 6) Lot 189: Replace Plan 2B with IXC 7) Lot 90: Replace Plan IXAR with IXCR 8) Lot 92: Replace Plan 2AR with IXAR 9) Lot 94: Replace Plan IBR with IAR 1 0) Lot 95: Replace Plan 2CR with IXBR 11) Lot 99: Replace Plan I A with I C We are seeing a strong demand for the IX plan and can't keep them "on the shelf'. We would like to meet buyer demand by increasing the number of IX plans available to them. We also had sewer and water conflicts with a number of the front walkways and replotting resolved those conflicts. Although not every lot needed to be changed, the domino effect causes surrounding houses to be replotted when a plan type or elevation is changed on one or two. Please see the attachments for further clarification. Thank you for your consideration and please let me know if I can provide any additional information for your reference. Sincerely, ~IELDHOMES Teri McHugh • City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 1111111111~ Ill~ 111111~ llllllllllli IIIII Applicant: BROOKFIELD DEL MAR BUILDERS Description Amount CD110006 656.00 Receipt Number: R0084214 Transaction ID: R0084214 Transaction Date: 04/22/2011 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 656.00 Transaction Amount: 656.00 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1111201-1 04/22/2011 98 Fri, Apr 22, 2011 12:29 PM Receipt Ref Nbr: R1111201-1/0047 PERMITS -PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 111120101 0047 0048 Trans/Rcpt#: R0084214 SET #: CD110006 Amount: Item Subtotal : Item Tot a 1: ITEM(S) TOTAL: Check (Chk# 566645) Total Received: Have a nice day! 1 @ $6.56.00 $656.00 $656.00 $656.00 $656.00 $656.00 ~~~~**:!'**~*~**~CUSTOMER COPY************* • • CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION FORM FOR CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION APPLICATION CITY USE ONLY Project Number: PROJECT NAME: 60 {\-OfJ- Assessor's Parcel Number(s): Description of proposal {add attachment if necessary): £ee__ -A-*cu:~d ~"L~\IWLII--~Cot---- (\) \._cr\ l£,6,: ~la.ce... 7.. 1\ u::. ~.\k IY..A j l0+ flo1 0(?\.u:c:-z.c._ wc-4... \XC....) lo+ t9~ '?ef\ac.e. 2Bie. QJ c_~O-IA..de.. ~Cyr-b,~ u..)u_\.ls. c-v.... v\o--v\. 2{)... ~ ~~ \au\-f~r a.~\ UJt-\(,... t'tB~ Would you like to orally present your proposal to your assigned staff planner/engineer? Yes D No ~ Please list the staff members you have previously spoken to regarding this project. If none, please so st~te. ~0-\e.~~ \ \ /" \ ~C!..Q...S.S4..r-l../ ~ <2\.Cl...irl~'ca._'""h S V\e..\ e..l..l ~ e_IJI...IAC::N'--, ~oiJ\ Ne..u 1 OWNERNAME(Print):~~£tJJ?0 ~~ ~1\\6 \..LL APPLICANTNAME(Print)]3ro0~_(~ ~(Ma-r~·,l¢k_ MAILING ADDRESS: \2 g-lo 5 Eh-:..11'-le \del N\o..c ll D I{ .¥.;lOG MAILING ADDRESS:_s::;::o.~(,.c.I..~!~IUI=(L....::::,__ _______ _ CITY,STATE,ZIP: J;Jd N\o..~ cJs. 4::;)..0\kf CITY,STATE,ZIP: TELEPHONE: ( f>_s~') :f ~ ( _ ~5O D TELEPHONE: EMAIL ADDRESS: ±vV\c....kJ\....Q bmo~{Zefd ~ W$ LCI)IL EMAIL ADDRESS: *Owner's signature indicates permission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal. I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MYKN~E-SIGN~ APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE (Print): I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND 0 ECT TO THE ST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ~~~---=-..::..:&::c~+L~_ .2-.r-If 1 11 \ DATE ·, 1014115 \,k c.... MAILING ADDRESS: _.....:S:,a_=-=-><\J-"'~=-----------------------:--------- CITY, STATE, ZIP: ~ TELEPHONE: EMAIL ADDRESS: FEB ' \ 2011 I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CO RE TO THE BEST F MY KNOWLEDGE. 2-tl-1( DATE OWNER SIGNATURE FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: ~(.P50/ ~-ll-t I . RECEIVED BY: P-16 Page 2 of2 C\TV OF CARLSBAD ~li\NN\NG DEPT QB\1 Ol.P011 Revised 07/10 r ' . DAOOKFIELD HOMES SAN DIEGO RIVERSIDE 12865 Pointe Del Mar Suite 200 Del Mar CA 92014-3859 Phone 858.481.8500 Fax 858.793.2395 www. brookfieldhomes. com • • RECEIVED February 11, 2011 Shelley Glennon City of Carlsbad FEB 11 2011 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT 1634 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 Re: Consistency Determination PUD06-12 Dear Ms. Glennon: We are requesting a Consistency Determination to approve the following changes to ourPUD: 1) Lot 166: Replace Plan 2A with a 1XA 2) Lot 169: Replace Plan 2C with a 1XC 3) Lot 184: Replace Plan 2BR with a 1XBR 4) Lot 176: Redesign front courtyard on the 2A 5) Lot 181: Redesign front courtyard on the 2A 6) Lot 186: Redesign front courtyard on the 2A Items 1-3: We currently have 7 homes that are not sold. Of those 7 homes, 6 of them are Plan 2's. We are seeing a strong demand for the 1X plan and can't keep them "on the shelf'. We would like to meet buyer demand by increasing the number of 1X plans available to them. We have kept the same elevations that were plotted with 2 plans. Items 4-6: We would also like to redesign the front courtyard of the 2A in order to meet buyer demand by enhancing the front elevation. Potential buyers have told us they don't like the lack of privacy provided by the current design. Therefore, we are considering a solid wood gate between the pilasters. The gate details have not yet been determined. We would also like to keep the arched window as a focal point by removing the wall that is currently partially blocking it and adding a pot shelf. Please see the attachments for further clarification. Thank you for your consideration and please let me know if I can provide any additional information for your reference. Sincerely, ~OO~IELD HOd/M· ES ~~4 \--- TeriMcHugh Assistant Project Manager ~ ~ ~ TD.f'l...AlE Sn>::GO T0.5F. T f'LA"l"f;- LEFT EI...EVATION "A" .,._.,.. <EKTB< a' J.-BOXr~·~fi£USH ~·DR.i-£1. V/JMJE56Y"f\Xll.flE FfWNT GOURTY.ARD EI..EYATION "A" i ~ '"-~ TO. PLATE 51UCGO ~ ~ TC.5f'. L T.O.f'l..A FRONT EI...EVATION "A"-MISSION r.o.f'l...Are ----------~2L~~~~ __________ JQ~~~~~ T.O. :re --""'-""---"~ _;[g_E!..'!!L.j.~ G-tnE '!>t\N'-s \O -:BE ~~f_~i-l.1We~ 539 s. Cedros A¥9., Solana lloach, CA 92075 858.350.05« 858.350.0540""" ROCKROSE AT THE FOOTHilLS IN CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA BY BROOKFIELD HOMES EXTERIOR EI...EVATION NOTES I. SEEDEr. VNJJ f'OR 1YPIG.'L R..ASI4tlS AT ""-1.. ~IN6S. 2. SEE DET. 3/I>DJ c 4/I'DJ FOR T'f"PIG.AL K4il. Pa£1RA.T10N5. 3. SEE R..OoR f'L.N45 f'OR 6lAZtf6 ~llOtl 4. TOP Of' GHit'-tel' 5tWJ.. BE A HIMIH.M OF 7<1" .-.eowE Wf ROOF ~THIN 10'-<T' OF Gi-ltft:T'. tsa= 20o1 cac 21e.<0 5 ~AHISHSHAU..eE. B..E'/Al1oti4A", 11&" 3 GoAT"511JGG00/111RE t-E9-I0/60 HlK ~ 'P' E!1.11...DttSo PN'ER (2 LA'I'lRS OF 60 MN 6fUrOE 'D' BA1.D1N6 PN'ER REGI.IIRfV AT-sGll..IO~"ORSI-E.trRI"W..15J fLEVATlOM "5", 118" 3 c;o,.\T 51UGCO Of 1'IIRE tESH 0/60 H1N 6fVDE '0' BJlDINIS PAPER (2 L.Al'ERS OF 60 HN 61UVE 'D" 8.11DtN1S PN'fR ~ AT~ BoiOJNLS" OR st6'R NrU.SI NV ROeiN.SOH. ntH eFUGK. (~ "ltBfiflJ ~ EQ.I.AL ltST~ f'Bt Mo'H.FAG11ftR'S Sf'EG.S. NV Sff: GOl..I::IR SGt£tE FOR AWtliCT NHlERHC>CG'l.C« H.EV.-.TIOM "t", 118" 3 c;o..\T51UGGO 0/i"WW:E teitl 0/60 Mit 6RJoDE '0' .ElJI.DIN6 PN'Ut (2 LA~ OF 60 HN 6RADE 'D' 8.III..DIMS PHII:R R'EI::iiJIRED AT"SClllo~40RstEM.Jo'W..L.S.) a.. OORAPO 5TOIE(~ VBfiRI OR Ea.W... INST,trU. PER MAN.F.4G-n.RRS SPECS. ND SEE: GOLOR sc:.t£tE FOR f'RODUC.T NHlER I>HD COLOR b. ct.A5S A FL)Of KTR1.. 01301' fB..T OI.SOUD SHT"6. StW..1. BE: H.EV.-.llON "A" • •c;•, ~ -s·lllE E<'6<£0R""""- ICBO' a<-<660 R...AT~Tll.E 6'6U'OR""""-IG80'E><--4060 1. ~ 1£'0 H36HTS Nl1! 16 FOI...1.t::lt'6 A~Tf\..CIOR, f'J'-<T(IJ.O.MJ SfGOtV fl...OOR, T--6'" (U.OJrlJ • '/4.' .C 'G' 1')'-<f(!J.O.N.J. "8' PI..AN :2 EXTERIOR EI...EVATIONS "A" SG.X.E. V-4" ,. 1'...0' f'l.ar1ED, :21V20U PA~, J,\i4'f'.O~\C.V\DEL.TA4\2\:2Id<IO_IDG5 -=-=''-:"-':'=-------SHEET JOB NO. , ... 025 DRAWN N'/r:JP OIECK SIS . Jt2.8 DATE CTI-<12-<71 Of City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 IIIII !I 1111111111111 11111111~ 1111 Applicant: BROOKFIELD DEL MAR BUILDERS INC Description Amount CD110002 656.00 Receipt Number: R0083178 Transaction ID: R0083178 Transaction Date: 02/11/2011 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 656.00 Transaction Amount: 656.00 City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 1104201-2 02/11/2011 98 Fri, Feb 11, 2011 03:25PM Receipt Ref Nbr: R1104201-2/0058 PERMITS -PERMITS Tran Ref Nbr: 110420102 0058 0058 Trans/Rcpt#: R008317B SET#: CD110002 Amount: Item Subtota 1 : Item Tot a 1: ITEM(S) TOTAL: Check (Chk# 565691) Total Received: Have a nice rl<w! 1 @ $656.00 $656.00 $656.00 $656.00 $656.00 $656.00 ********~*****CUSTOMER COPY************* . -... CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE REVIEW APPLICATION 1) APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: {CHECK BOXES) ·(FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY) 0 Administrative Permit [8] Planned Development Permit f\J 0(J/p tJI ?.A. Amendment 0 Administrative Variance D Planned Industrial Permit 0 Coastal DevelOpment Permit 0 Planning Commission Determination 0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Precise Development Plan 0 Condominium Permit D Redevelopment Permit 0 Environmental Impact Assessment D Site Development Plan 0 General Plan Amendment 0 Special Use Permit 0 Habitat Management Plan Permit ·o Specific Plan 0 Hillside Development Permit 0 +aRiali¥e PaFsal Map Obtain from Engineering Department D Local Coastal Program Amendment D Tentative Tract Map D Master Plan 0 Variance 0 Minor Conditional Use Permit D Zone Change '· 0 0 Non-ResldenUal. Planned Development List other appl19atlons not specified 2) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 168-050-47 3) 4) PROJECT NAME: PA 16 Robertson Ranch PUD 06-12 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 85 lots on Planning Area 16 within Robertson Ranch 5) OWNER NAME (Print or Type) 6) APPLICANT NAME (Print or Type) Calavera Hills II, LLC Calavera Hills II, LLC MAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRE$S 2750 Womble Road 2750 Womble Road CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE CITY AND STATE ZIP TELEPHONE San Dieqo, CA 92106 (619)794-1286 San Diego, CA 92106 (619)794-1286 EMAIL ADDRESS: iaates@mcmillin. com EMAIL ADDRESS: jqates@mcmillin. com I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT All THE ABOVE I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATNE OF THE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND 90RRECT TO THE BEST OF MY OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND KNOWLEDGE. g/z.7 (o7 CORRECT TO 'fHE-BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. g/z7/ol . e7/_., q~ z SIG~_ DATE S~wKE DATE an: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPL~~Jl.ED, MUST BE SUBMIT'TED PRIOR TO 3:30P.M. PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE APPUCATION Fl , MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00P.M. Form 14 Rev. 06101 PAGE 1 OF 4 \Xv owol4 ,.. • 7) BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION Portions of Lots D & E of Rancho Agua Hedionda, City of Carlsbad 6) LOCATION OF PROJECT: County of San Diego, State of CA, Map No 823, November 16, 1896 Robertson Ranch Planning Area 16 9) STREET ADDRESS ON THE J North I SIDE OF I Cannon Rd. (NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, WEST) !NAME OF STREETt BETWEEN r El Camino Real (NAME OF STREET) AND I College' Blvd. !NAME OF STAEETI IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPUCATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. 1/WE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. 10) PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRICTION FILED ON THE PROPERTY TITLE IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. CERTAIN APPROVALS (SUCH AS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) RUN WITH THE LAND AND BIND ANY SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. c::-..~-- WNER SIGNATURE Form 14 Rev. 06(07 RECEIVED AUG 31 2007 CITY OF CARLSBAD DATfs'rNrJ~"'~IceiVED RECEIVED BY: PAGE 2 OF4 ec. lty e of Carlsbad IQFihhi.i·'•'4·ifi41 .. 1§.11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission or Committee. The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print. Note: Person is defined as ".Any individual, firm, co·partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner must be provided below. 1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent) 2. Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a comoration or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON- APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW If a publicly-owned corooration. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) see t{ fh; wJ Person Corp/Part See attached Title ___________ _ Title. _____________ _ Address __________ _ Address ____________ _ OWNER (Not the owner's agent) Provide the COMPLETE. LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal ownership (i.e, partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, title, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON·APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly- owned corporation. include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.) S.u! £A lf-~ckJ Person ___________ _ Corp/Part. __ s_e_e_a_t_t_a_ch_e_d _____ _ Title, ___________ _ Title ______________ _ Address __________ _ R~r&ID:!t------- AUG 3 1 2007 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 @ 3. NON·PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST If any person identified pursuant to ( 1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the. NonProfiVTrust. ______________ __ Non Profit/Trust. __________ _ Title. ___________ _ Title. _____________ _ Address. ___________ _ Address. ________________ _ 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelv:~ (12) months? 0 Yes ~No If yes, please indicate person(s): _______________ _ NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary. I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Ja51-(UA ~. Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent H:ADMIN\COUNTER\OISCLOSURE STATEMENT 5/98 Page 2 of 2 1. Applicant 2. Owner Disclosure Statement Calavera Hills ll, LLC 2750 Womble Road San Diego, CA 92106 N/A McMillin Companies, LLC 2750 Womble Road San Diego, CA 92106 N/A Brookfield Tamarack, LLC 12865 Pointe Del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 N/A Calavera Hills ll, LLC 2750 Womble Road San Diego, CA 92106 • Joint Venture between McMillin Companies, LLC and Brookfield Tamarak, LLC N/A McMillin Comp~es, LLCI, LLC 2750 Womble Road San Diego, CA 92106 Joint Venture with Brookfield Tamarak, LLC N/A Brookfield Tamarack, LLC 12865 Pointe Del Mar Del Mar, CA 92014 Joint Venture with McMillin Companies, LLC N/A PROJECT DESCRIPTION/EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME: PA 16 PUD Amendment APPLICANT NAME: _c_a_la_v_e_ra_H_i_lls_l_l ,_L_L_c ______ .....;__. _' ------.,.... Please d~scribe fully the P,roposed project by application type. lndude any details necessary to adequately explain the scope· and/or operation. of the proposed project. You may also include any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary. Description/Explanation: The proposed project involves the approval of architectural design for 85 existing single family lots within Planning Area 16 of the Robertson Ranch East Village. The architecture proposed involves four floor plans. Plan One contains a 2,246 sf floor area in a single story plan. Plan One X is 2,992 sf, with a primarily single story, plus partial bonus second story. Plan Two contains 3,192 sf in a two story design. And Plan Three contains 3,380 sf in a two story design. All four product types allow for a Spanish, English Country or Italian elevation style. .. Project Description 1 0/96 RECEIVED AUG 9 1 2007 CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPT Page 1 of 1 t .. City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 111111111 ~Ill ~ 111m 1111~ 1~111~111111~ ~1111~ Ill Applicant: CALAVERA HILLS II, LLC Description Amount PUD06012A 94.30 2424 CANNON RD CBAD Receipt Number: R0066275 Transaction ID: R0066275 Transaction Date: 08/31/2007 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 94.30 Transaction Amount: 94.30 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 1111~~'"1111111m ~1m 11~111111111~ 1111111~ Applicant: CALAVERA HILLS II, LLC Description Amount PUD06012A 7,200.00 2424 CANNON RD CBAD Receipt Number: R0066273 Transaction ID: R0066273 Transaction Date: 08/31/2007 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 7,200.00 Transaction Amount: 7,200.00 • • • City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 111~11~ Ill~ 1111111111111~1111~ II Applicant: CALAVERA HILLS II, LLC Description Amount PUD06012A 320.04 2424 CANNON RD CBAD Receipt Number: R0071654 Transaction ID: R0071654 Transaction Date: 09/02/2008 Pay Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 320.04 Transaction Amount: 320.04 City of Car·lsbad Faraday Center Faraday Cashiering 001 0824601-1 09/02/2008 75 Tue Sep02,2008 12:05 PM PERMIIS -PERMITS $320.04 Tran Nbr: 082460101 0027 0028 Trans/Rcpt#: R0071654 SET #: PUD06012A IIEM(SJ: TOTAL: $320.04 Check (Chk# 0227) $320.04 Total Rece1ved: $320.04 Have a nice day! -0 1 ' 6 8 5 Notice of Determination To: Office of Planning and Research P.O. Box 3044 From: Sacramento, CA 95812-3044[F ~ ~ [Q) SO County Clerk Gregory J. Smlth,~corder /County Clerk Attn: Anthony J. Consul Mail Stop A-33 1600 Pacific Highway San Diego, CA 921 0 1 ·sEP 2 4 2008 BY_-J.4'.{;,.L4'-/.j:.1 :::;D:;EP:::UTY:.:_ CITY OF CARLSBAD Planning Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 602-4600 Project No: PUD 06-12(A) and UD 06-4(A) Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Robertson Ranch P A 16 and P A 18 Project Title 2004051039 City of Carlsbad, Barbara Kennedy State Clearinghouse No. Lead Agency, Contact Person North of Cannon Road and west of College Boulevard Carlsbad, CA (San Diego County) Project Locations (include County) oc1 Name of Applicant: Calavera Hills II, LLC . n-,.,~rtment p11nn•r.Q -"• · Applicant's Address: P. 0. Box 85104 San Diego, CA 92186-5104 cyol Applicant's Telephone Number: 619-794-1252 CaflsLad Project Description: Request for approval of Planned Development Permit Amendments for building elevations and plotting for the development of 85 single-family detached homes within Planning Area (PA) 16 J and 110 single-family detached homes within PA 18 of the East Village of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan. The project was described in the Program EIR for the Robertson Ranch Master Plan and the proposed activities will have no effects beyond those analyzed in the Program EIR. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on September 17, 2008, and has made the following determination regarding the above described project. 1. The project will have a significant effect on the environment 2. [8] An Environmental Impact report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 0 A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 0 This project was reviewed previously and a Negative Declaration was prepared pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project. 5. A statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project. 6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions ofCEQA. This is to certify that the final Robertson Ranch Master Plan Program EIR 03-03 with comments and 'r4::' 5-t of project approval is available to the General Public at THE CITY OF;~;;:~8' DON NEU, Planning Director FILED IN THE OFFICE OF I HE COON I Y CLERK Date San Diego Coun!Y on StP 2 4 2008 !MJ Date received for filing at OPR: Posted SEP 2 4 ZOOB ~m,qv~d D.C I 2 4 Oc 1 ~ ~ ZOCJ Returned to agenGy on . _ .. __ .. .. -· .. . Deputy ___ . Revised December 2004 FJ!J y STATE OF CALIFORNIA· •• tE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT OFG 753.5a (8·03) • 278874 Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad Date: 11/16/2006· County I State Agency of Filing: San Diego Document No.: 13868 Project Tille: Robertson Ranch Master Plan and Robertson Ranch East Village Master Tentative Map Project Applicant Name: McMIUian Land Development (Brian Mfllch) Project Applicant Address: PO Box 85104, San Diego, CA 92816-5104 Phone Number: {619) 794-1308 Project Applicant (check appropriate box): Local Public Agency lZJ School District D Other Special District 0 State Agency O Private En!lly O CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: (.,') Environmental Impact Report ( ) Negallve Declaration ( } Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) ( ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs (.,') County Admlnlstralive Fee $850.00 s $1,250.00 $ $850.00 $ $850.00 $ $25.00 $ 850.00 25.00 ( ) Project that is exempt from fees . /J /TOTAL RECEIVED $--=-__ 8_7_5_.0_0_ ~ A. Consul oeputy Signature and Iitle of person receiving payment: WHITE· PROJECT APPUCANT YELLOW· OFGIFASB PltiK • LEAD AGENCY GOLDENROD· STATE AGENCY OF FlUNG • PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010 8t 2011 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Diego I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of North County Times Formerly known as the Blade-Citizen and The Times- Advocate and which newspapers have been adjudicated newspapers of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, for the City of Oceanside and the City of Escondido, Court Decree number 171349, for the County of San Diego, that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: September osth, 2008 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at OCEANSIDE, California Jane Allshouse NORTH COUN1Y TIMES Legal Advertising This space is for t~ounty Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of PublicatiOil of .... SEP 2008 Planr·· e FfLE COFi ~ 9-3·~ City of Carlsbad I ALl,.,.,,,. I •14 .,.,I I ·*411 M NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, September 17, 2008, to consider a request for the following: CASE NAME: PUBLISH DATE: PUD 06-12(A) -Robertson Ranch PA 16 and PUD 06-14(A) - Robertson Ranch PA 18 September 5, 2008 DESCRIPTION: Request for a determination that the projects are within the scope of the previously certified Robertson Ranch Master Plan Final Program EIR and that the Program EIR adequately describes the activities for the purposes of CEQA; and approval of Planned Development Permit Amendments for building elevations and plotting for the development of 85 single-family detached homes within Planning Area (PA) 16 and 110 single-family detached homes within PA 18 of the East Village of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan, generally located north of Cannon Road, west of College Boulevard, and east of future Wind Trail Way in Local Facilities Management Zone 14. Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project. Copies of the staff report will be available online at http://www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us/pdfdoc.html?pid=295 on or after the Friday prior to the hearing date. If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Barbara Kennedy in the Planning Department at (760) 602-4626, Monday through Thursday 7:30a.m. to 5:30p.m., Friday 8:00a.m. to 5:00p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. APPEALS The time within which you may judicially challenge these projects, if approved, is established by State law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing. o Appeals to the Citv Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission. Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402. CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!) SITE MAP Rancho Carlsbad • N NOT TO SCALE Robertson Ranch PA's 16 and 18 PUD 06-12(A) and PUD 06-14(A) ATTACHMENT "2" CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I certify that the "Notice of Project Application" has been posted at a conspicuous location on the site on 8 sept. 2008 (DATE) PRINT NAME: Seth Schulberg PROJECT NAME: Robertson Ranch PA 16 and PA 18 PROJECT NUMBER: PUD 06-12(A) PUD 06-14(A) LOCATION: Sign 1 on Cannon and Hiltop and 1 at College on north end of Project. RETURNTO: ___ B_a_rb_a_r_a __ K_en_n_e_d_Y ____________ __ (Planner) CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 NOTlCE OF PUBLIC HEARI.N DIEGO COUNTY CLERK of.OARD OF sR~~y Mail to: Public Notice Hearings, Mailstop A-45, Room 402, 1600 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA 92101 "r· /41.05 Response must be received by: September 15. 2008 Public Hearing Date: September 17. 2008 Public Hearing Place: 1200 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE. CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA. 92008 Public Hearing Time: _6~:~0.!!.0~.m~.,__-------------------------------- Project Title: PUD 06-12(A) and PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH PA 16 and PA 18 Lead Agency: CITY OF CARLSBAD -PLANNING Contact Person: _ ___,B=ar=bar=a=K=e=nn=e=d,.....y _________ _ Street Address: 1635 FARADAY A VENUE Phone: ""'(7""'6~0).....,6=0=2-_,4=62=6'------------------ City: CARLSBAD Zip: 92008 County: SAN DIEGO COUNTY "P"R:o:JEci"L"oc·A'Ti<l'N~ ..... _ ....................................................................................... _ ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... .. County: SAN DIEGO COUNTY City/Nearest Community: ""C""'IT,._Y"--"'0""-F_,C~A-""RL=S,..,B:<.O.AD~-------------- Cross Streets: North of Cannon Road. west of College Boulevard and east of future Wind Trail Way Total Acres: 45.18acres Assessor's Parcel No. Portion of 168-050-47-00 Section: __ Twp. __ Range: __ Base: __________ _ Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: 1-5 Waterways: Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Pacific Ocean Airports: McCLELLAN/PALOMAR Railways: NCTD Schools: Carlsbad Unified School District ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: CEQA: 0 NOP 0 Supplement/Subsequent 0 Early Cons [8] EIR (Prior SCH No.) __ #"-"2""'00""4,0..,_51...,0""39~------- 0 Neg Dec 0 Other:------------------0 DraftEIR LOCAL ACTION TYPE: 0General Plan Update 0 0General Plan Amendment 0 0General Plan Element 0 Ozone Code Amendment 0 DEVELOPMENT TYPE: Specific Plan Master Plan Planned Unit Development Site Plan [8]Residential: Units _1!,.<9~5 _______ _ Ooffice: Sq. Ft.---------- Ocommercial: Sq. Ft.---------- 0Industrial: Sq. Ft.----------0 Recreational: 0 Rezone 0 UsePermit 0 Land Division (Subdivision, Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) Acres 45.18 Acres------ Acres------ Acres------ 0 Annexation 0 Redevelopment 0 Coastal Permit [8] Other: PUD Amendments ··································································································································-······································-····--........................................................................................................ --········-······-······················· .............................................. . PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT: [8]AestheticNisual [8] Flood Plain/Flooding 0 Schools/Universities [8] Water Quality [8]Agricultural Land 0 Forest Land/Fire Hazard 0 Septic Systems 0 Water Supply/Ground Water [8]Air Quality [8] Geological/Seismic D Sewer Capacity [8] Wetland/Riparian [8]Archaeological/Historical D Minerals D Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading [8] Wildlife Ocoastal Zone [8] Noise D Solid Waste [8] Growth Inducing 0Drainage/ Absorption [8] Population/Housing Balance [8] Toxic/Hazardous [8] Land Use 0Economic/Jobs [8] Public Services/Facilities ~ Traffic/Circulation [8] Cumulative Effect 0Fiscal D Recreation/Parks [8] Vegetation [8] Other:Hydrology .. P"~~s·~~'t''ia·~·d .. us~: .. va~a.ni!iifli'CieCi ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .. Zoning: P-C-Planned Community General Plan Land Use: RM-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dulac) Project Description: A request for approval of Planned Development Permit Amendments for building floor plans, elevations, and plotting for 85 du's on 19.16 acres within Planning Area (PA) 16 and 110 du's on 26.02 acres within PA 18 of the Robertson Ranch Master Plan. The lots were previously subdivided under CT 04-26, PUD 06-12, and PUD 06-14. The project is within the scope ofthe previously certified Robertson Ranch Master Plan Final Program EIR 03-03. Where documents are located for Public Review: Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 August 2006 I PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: e Cit EARLY PUBLIC NOTICE Robertson Ranch PA's 16, 17 and 18 PUD 06-12(A)/PUD 06-13(A)/PUD 06-14(A) This early public notice is to let you know that development applications for the plotting and architecture of 314 single-family residences near your neighborhood were submitted to the City of Carlsbad on August 31, 2007. The project applications are undergoing initial review by the City. LOCATION: North side of Cannon Road, west of College Boulevard and east of future Wind Trail Way. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The development proposals are for the plotting and architectural review of 314 single-family residences located within a 73.45 acre site identified as Planning Areas (PA) 16, 17 and 18 of the East Village of Robertson Ranch. The tentative tract map for the site (CT 04-26}, which was previously approved, created 314 residential lots that have a minimum lot size of 5,000 sf, with the exception of lots adjacent to Cannon Road which may have a minimum lot size of 4,500 sf. Each Planning Area includes four unique floor plans and three architectural styles as outlined on the following page. The conceptual plotting plan and floor plans of the residences are available for review at the City of Carlsbad Planning Department. Please keep in mind that this is an early public notice and that the project design could change as a result of further staff and public review. A future public hearing notice will be mailed to you when this project is scheduled for public hearing before the Planning Commission. CONTACT INFORMATION: If you have questions or comments regarding this proposed project please contact Barbara Kennedy, Associate Planner at bkenn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us, (760) 602-4626, City of Carlsbad Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. I 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us {i) PA 16 #of units Stories Square Feet #of bdrm/bath Plan 1 15 1 story 2,632 sf 3 bdrm 12 bath Plan 1X 9 2 story 2,730 sf 4 bdrm +opt bdrm 513 bath Plan 2 32 2 story 3,050 sf 3+ opt bdrm 4 I 2 % bath Plan 3 29 2 story 3,180 sf 4 bdrm + bonus rm I 4 % bath Total Units: 85 units PA 17 #of units Stories Square Feet # of bdrm/bath Plan 1 18 1 story 2,005 sf 3 bdrm +opt bdrm 412 bath Plan 1X 13 2 story 2,648 sf 4 bdrm +opt bdrm 5 & 613 bath Plan 2 39 2 story 3,045 sf 4 bdrm + opt bdrm 5 12 % - 3 bath Plan 3 39 2 story 3,287 sf 4 bdrm +opt bdrm 5 +loft 14 bath Total Units: 109 units PA 18 #of units Stories Square Feet # of bdrm/bath Plan 1 17 1 story 2,010 sf 3 bdrm 12 bath Plan 1X 12 2 story 2,560 sf 4 bdrm +opt bdrm 513 bath Plan 2 40 2 story 2,795 sf 4 bdrm +opt bdrm 513 bath Plan 3 41 2 story 2,805 sf 4 bdrm +opt bdrm 513 bath Total Units: 110 units PA 17: McMillin Homes PA 16 & 18: Brookfield Homes SITE MAP • N NOT TO SCALE Robertson Ranch PA's 16, 17 and 18 PUD 06-12(A) I PUD 06-13(A) I PUD 06-14(A) City of Carlsbad Robertson Ranch PA's 16, 17 and 18 PUD 06-12(A) I PUD 06-13(A) I PUD 06-14(A) N A 0 1,200 --==-~:::::J-----Feet 300 600 Map created by the City of Carlsbad GIS. Portions of the DERIVED PRODUCT contain geographic information copyrighted by SanG IS. All Rights Reserved • DATE : MARCH 8, 2012 CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO PROJECT NO(S): {lii12-03 J REVIEW NO: c-1 :;t ~----------------------------------- PROJECT TITLE: ROCKROSE ------------------------------------------------------~ APPLICANT: BROOKFIELD DEL MAR BUILDERS, INC./TERI McHUGH TO : [anCf Development Engineering-Terie Rowley D Police Department-J. Sasway D Fire Department-Greg Ryan D Building Department-Will Foss D Recreation-Mark Steyaert D Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque D Water/Sewer District D Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA D School District D North County Transit District-Planning Department D Sempra Energy-Land Management D Caltrans {Send anything adjacent to 1-5) D Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM : PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the NNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by J[ID12. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. COMMENTS: __ +//Ic)~;....._· ----'~-4.L.L~~~ ... ~-----,-~-------Thank you f ;' ~ > ~:=n:zk t Signature Date PLANS AD ACHED Review & Comment 03/10 • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO • ctJVJbe# DATE: APRIL 22,2011 @ 4/~s- ~-----------=~--------------------------------------------~----~ PROJECT NO(S): [Co 11.-.06 . REVIEW NO: (:1--:, =-------~--------------------------- PROJECT TITLE: ROCKROSE ROBERTSON RANCH APPLICANT: BROOKFIELD DEL MAR BUILDERS/TERI McHUGH TO: [:83 land Development Engineering-Terie Rowley D Police Department -J. Sasway D Fire Department-James Weigand D Building Department-Will Foss D Recreation -Mark Steyaert D Public Works Department (Streets)-Nick Roque D Water/Sewer District D Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA D School District D North County Transit District-Planning Department D Sempra Energy-Land Management D Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) D Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the lNG TRACKING DESK in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, b~ 5/20/11. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Signature Date PLANS ATIACHED Review & Comment 03/10 CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 2011 PROJECT NO(S): C.CD~ll-02 REVIEW NO:CI:J ~----------------------------------- PROJECT TITLE: ROBERTSON RANCH PA14 & PA16 APPLICANT: BROOKFIELD DEL MAR BUILDERS, INC./TERI McHUGH TO: D D D D D D D D Police Department-J. Sasway Fire Department-James Weigand Building Department-Will Foss Recreation-Mark Steyaert Public Works Department (Streets)-Thomas Moore ________________ Water/Sewer District Landscape Plancheck Consultant-PELA School District --------------0 North County Transit District-Planning Department 0 Sempra Energy-Land Management 0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) D Parks/Trails-Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please review and submit writ n comments and/or conditions the PI:ANNING TRACKING DESK in the Planning Department at .ay_ Avenue..ll¥ 11. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know. Signature PLANS ATTACHED __-- Review & Comment Date 03/10 ~ft city of Carlsbad Engineering Development Services August 7, 2008 To: Barbara Kennedy, Project Planner From: Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer SUBJECT: ROBERTSON RANCH PA 16, PUD 06-12(A) The Engineering Department has completed its review of the project. The Engineering Department is recommending that the project be approved, subject to the following conditions: Engineering Conditions NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the approval of this proposed development, must be met prior to approval of a building or grading permit whichever occurs first. General 1. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. 2. Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections and driveways in accordance with City Engineering Standards and City Landscape Manual. Grading 3. Supplemental grading plans are required for precise grading associated with this project. Developer shall prepare, and submit for approval, grading plans for the precise grading as shown on the Site Plan all subject to City Engineer approval. 4. Developer shall apply for and obtain a grading permit from the City Engineer. Developer shall pay all applicable grading permit fees per the City's latest fee schedule and shall post security per City Code requirements. 5. Developer shall comply with the City's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices C :\DOCUME-1\Bkenn\LOCALS-1 \Temp\XPgrpwise\Conditions-of-Approval PUD 06-12A.doc Page: I include but are not limited to pollution treatment practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. 6. Developer shall complete and submit to the City Engineer a Project Threat Assessment Form (PT AF) pursuant to City Engineering Standards. Concurrent with the PTAF, Developer shall also submit the appropriate Tier level Storm Water Compliance form and Tier level Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as determined by the completed PTAF all to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. Developer shall incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) design techniques, on all final design plans submitted to the City, to reduce the amount of run-off by mimicking the natural hydrologic function of the site by preserving natural open- spaces and natural drainage channels, minimizing impervious surfaces, promoting infiltration and evaporation of run-off before run-off leaves the site. Developer shall incorporate LID techniques using current County of San Diego Low Impact Development Handbook (Stormwater Management Strategies). LID techniques include, but are not limited to: vegetated swale/strip, rain gardens, and porous pavement, which can greatly reduce the volume, peak flow rate, velocity and pollutants. Code Reminders The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including but not limited to the following: 9. Developer shall pay traffic impact and sewer impact fees based on Section 18.42 and Section 13.10 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, respectively. The Average Daily Trips (ADT) and floor area contained in the staff report and shown on the Site Plan are for planning purposes only. C :\DOCUME-I \Bkenn\LOCALS-I IT emp\XPgrpwise\Conditions-of-Approval PUD 06-I 2A.doc Page: 2 • July 14, 2008 TO: Barbara Kennedy, Associate Planner Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist PLANNtNG DEPT TRACK\NG DESK REC'D:J p\JjCJg. FROM: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -2"d Review Robertson Ranch PA 16, PUD06-12A Robertson Ranch PELA file: 331-Robertson Ranch PA16 ~ Con2 Landscape Architect: GMP, Phone: (858) 558-8977 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. REPEAT COMMENTS 1-4 Completed. 5. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans for the next submittal. NEW COMMENTS 1A. Please revise mulch to a 3" layer (typical all notes). PROJECT NAME: Date: CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Protection Services PLAN REVIEW REPORT Robertson Ranch PA 16 05/28/08 Project Number: Planning: PUD 06-12A Staff Planner: B. Kennedy Engineer: Initial review: (Note: This commentary identifies fire protection issues associated with the project, and/or prescribes specific corrections or information needed to achieve Fire Department approval.) Fire department has reviewed this project submittal and has no comments or conditions for approval. GR May 11, 2008 TO: Barbara Kennedy, Associate Planner Michele Masterson, Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist FROM: RE: Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -1st Review Robertson Ranch PA 16, PUD06-12A Robertson Ranch PELA file: 331-Robertson Ranch PA16-Coni Landscape Architect: GMP, Phone: (858) 558-8977 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements ofthe City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. 1. Architectural plans provide for 3 themes (Mission, English Country and Italian Tuscany) on each of the different architectural plans. Landscape plans provide one theme plan for each of 4 architectural house plans. It is recommended that the plants proposed for each of the 3 themes be used to coordinate with the particular architectural theme as appropriate. It is assumed this is the applicant's intent. Please clarify the intent with a note on the plans. See comment number 5 below. If to be maintained by an HOA, concept plans are needed per the Landscape Manual. 2. Please indicate where the accent vines are to be used. 3. Please indicate who will be responsible for maintenance ofthe front yards. Is this to be homeowner or HOA maintained? 4. Please provide general notes for the irrigation design. Address hydrozones, provide a written description ofwater conservation features including addressing xeriscape principles, overspray, weather controls, etc. 5. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans for the next submittal. DATE: MAY 8, 2008 CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO REVIEW NO: 3 TO: ~ Engineering, Development Services-Terie Rowley D Police Department-J. Sasway FROM: ~ Fire Department -Greg Ryan ~ Building Department -Will Foss D Recreation -Mark Steyaert D Public Works Department (streets)-Thomas Moore D Water/Sewer District ~ Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA D School District D North County Transit District -Planning Department D Sempra Energy -Land Management D Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) D Parks/Trails -Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): PUD 06-12A PROJECT TITLE: ROBERTSON RANCH PA 16 APPLICANT: CALAVERA HILLS II LLC PROPOSAL: 85 LOTS ON PA 16 Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON, Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 05/29/2008 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact BARBARA KENNEDY , at X4626 . Thank you COMMENTS: ___ tJ_() __ am. __ m_t?iV7 __ -____________ _ wru.-~ PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 e e ......... " o&PJ CITY OF CARLSBAD TMCCIIIG ~ REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO MC'D: ) I UICB DATE: TO: FROM: JANUARY 3, 2008 REVIEW NO: 2 [8J D [8J [8J D D D D D D D D D Engineering, Development Services-Terie Rowley Police Department-J. Sasway Fire Department -Greg Ryan Building Department-Will Foss Recreation -Mark Steyaert Public Works Department (streets)-Thomas Moore ___________ Water/Sewer District Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA ___________ School District North County Transit District -Planning Department Sempra Energy-Land Management Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) Parks/Trails -Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT N PROJECT TITLE: ROBERTSON RANCH EASTVILLA~D 18 APPLICANT:~M=C=M=IL=L=IN~------------------- PROPOSAL: 85 LOTS ON PA 16, 110 LOTS ON PA 18 Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON, Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 01/24/08 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact BARBARA KENNEDY , at X4626 . Thank you COMMENTS: ___ ~~~~~~~--------------------------------- PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 09/07 DATE: e • CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO JANUARY 3, 2008 REVIEW NO: 2 TO: [8J Engineering, Development Services-Terie Rowley D Police Department-J. Sasway FROM: [8J Fire Department -Greg Ryan [8J Building Department -Will Foss 0 Recreation -Mark Steyaert 0 Public Works Department (streets)-Thomas Moore D Water/Sewer District D Landscape Plancheck Consultant -PELA D School District D North County Transit District -Planning Department D Sempra Energy-Land Management D Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5) 0 Parks/Trails -Liz Ketabian *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO: PUD 06-12A I PUD 06-14A PROJECT TITLE: ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA 16 AND 18 APPLICANT:___:.:.M.:..::C=M=IL=L=IN~------------------- PROPOSAL: 85 LOTS ON PA 16. 110 LOTS ON PA 18 Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON, Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 01/24/08 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact BARBARA KENNEDY , at X4626 . Thank you COMMENTS: I • WO fAI'r(.J Cbll0tTtt51VS z. CoNS r~UA,c rc.d"W q 1/Ahl s St(IIU. U?rAtp'=f WJ/14 ~l PLANS ATIACHED Review & Comment 09/07 • • City of Carlsbad ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM October 2, 2007 TO: Barbara Kennedy, Planning FROM: Jeremy Riddle, Engineering SUBJECT: FIRST REVIEW ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE, PA 16 [PUD 06-12 (a}] Engineering Department staff has reviewed the application as to its completeness for processing. Based on staff review, the application is complete, as submitted. Below we have identified the· issues: 1. Revise the exhibits to include the current the application number in the upper right hand corner (typical). Refer to red lines for clarification. 2. Revise the legal description to list the recently recorded map no for CT 02-16. 3. Revise the water quality note to specify PA 20 contains the vegetated swale. 4. Revise the exhibits to address the discrepancies in driveway locations as compared to driveways shown on CT 04-26. Refer to redlines for clarification. Staff hopes to understand which location is correct. 5. Revise the TM to address the discrepancy in lot line configuration as compared to CT 04-26. Which is correct? Refer to red lines for clarification. 6. Address redlines as noted on the returned exhibits. Please be advised, this check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. If you have any questions regarding the engineering issues, please contact me at 760-602-2737. -e PLANNING DEPT CITY OF CARLSBAD REVIEW AND COMMENT MEM~~t1~i~ DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 2007 REVISED PLANS D TO: C8J ENGINEERING, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES -TERIE ROWLEY 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT-J. SASWAY IZJ FIRE DEPARTMENT-GREG RYAN IZJ BUILDING DEPARTMENT-WILL FOSS 0 RECREATION -MARK STEYAERT 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (STREETS) -THOMAS MOORE 0 WATER/SEWER DISTRICT 0 LANDSCAPE PLANCHECK CONSULTANT-PELA 0 SCHOOL DISTRICT 0 NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT-PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 SEMPRA ENERGY-LAND MANAGEMENT D CAL TRANS (send anything adjacent to 1-5) 0 PARKS/TRAILS-LIZ KETABIAN *ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ON PROJECT NO(S): PUD 06-12(A) PROJECT TITLE: PA 16 ROBERTSON RANCH APPLICANT: CALAVERA HILLS II LLC PROPOSAL: 85 LOTS ON PA 16 Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to MEGHAN JACOBSON, Senior Office Specialist in the Planning Department at 1635 Faraday Avenue, by 09/21/07 . If you have "No Comments", please so state. If you have any questions, please contact Barbara Kennedy , at x4626 . THANK YOU COMMENTS: fLA1Jc;: tV I~ /Pft, tf(;vl{fk)lf'o WI:IPIJ t'c.t0t1 , r 1l?b ?Y'-: Pwnv C!ft?(;IL , t~ s PLANS ATTACHED Review & Comment 01/07 PROJECT NAME: Date: Project number: Staff Planner: • CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Prevention Division Land Use Review Report Robertson Ranch PA 16 09/23/07 PUD 06-12(A) B. Kennedy Engineer: PLANNING DEPT TRAC~:JNG DESK REC'D: CJ·2.5 (Jj Project conditions: (Note: The following identifies specific conditions necessary to achieve Fire Department approval.) Fire Department has reviewed this application and would comment or ask the following questions. 1. Are these street designed to a "Livable Streets" standard as outlined in Ordinance NS- 603? 2. If not, what design standard was used that incorporates the use of 'chokers' at the intersections and at some mid-block points? Fire is strongly suggesting that given these designs that residential fire sprinklers are warranted throughout this project, unless an acceptable remedy to the traffic calming features is provided. GR ,-• Af~_A. CITY OF VcARLSBAD Planning Division May 10, 2011 Brookfield Del Mar Builders, Inc. Attn: Teri McHugh 12865 Pointe Del Mar Way, Suite 200 Del Mar, CA 92014 • SUBJECT: CD 11-06-ROCKROSE ROBERTSON RANCH PA16 www.carlsbadca.gov The Planning Director has completed a review of your Consistency Determination application for building modifications to the Planned Development Permit Amendment (PUD 06-12(A)) for Robertson Ranch Planning Area 16 generally located north of Cannon Road and west of College Boulevard in Local Facilities Management Zone 14. The proposed building modifications include: • Lot 90: Replace Plan 1 XAR with 1 XCR; • Lot 92: Replace Plan 2AR with 1 XAR; • Lot 94: Replace Plan 1 BR with 1 AR; • Lot 95: Replace Plan 2CR with 1 XBR; and • Lot 99: Replace Plan 1A with 1 C. • Lot 160: Replace Plan 2CR with 3AR; • Lot 162: Replace Plan 3AR with 3CR; • Lot 186: Replace Plan 2A with 1 B; • Lot 187: Replace Plan 1 B with 1XA; • Lot 188: Replace Plan 3A with 3B; • Lot 189: Replace Plan 2B with 1XC; In order for a Discretionary Permit Consistency Determination to be approved, all of the following findings must be made: 1) No project condition, feature, facility or amenity is changed or deleted that had been considered essential to the project's design, quality, safety or function. 2) The request represents an upgrade in overall design features and or materials and improves upon the project's compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. 3) The proposed revision does not change the density or boundary of the subject property. 4) The proposed revision does not involve the addition of a new land use not shown on the original permit. 5) The proposed revision does not rearrange the major land uses within the development. 6) The proposed revision does not create changes of greater than ten percent provided that compliance will be maintained with the applicable development standards of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 7) The proposed change will not result in any significant environmental impact, and/or require additional mitigation. 8) The proposed change would not result in any health, safety or welfare impacts. 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 T 760-602-4600 F 760-602-8559 CD 11-06-ROCKROSE RIERTSON RANCH PA16 May 10, 2011 Page 2 • 9) There were not any major issues or controversies associated with the original project which would be exacerbated with the proposed change. 10) The proposed change would not be readily discernable to the decision makers as being substantially different from the project as originally approved. After careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding this request, the Planning Director has determined that the application qualifies for a consistency determination with the approved permit and therefore, approves the changes to the project based on Planning Division Administrative Policy No. 35. Please submit two (2) blueline copies (24" X 36") of all applicable exhibits for the project file and a reproducible 24" X 36" mylar copy of the amended site plan. The mylar must be submitted, stamped "Consistency Determination," and signed by the Planning Director prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. The Consistency Determination Title Block stamp, and other Title Block stamps, can be downloaded from the City's website at http://www. carlsbadca. gov/services/departments/planning/Pages/applications. aspx. The Title Block (stamp) is located under "Resources" on the right side of the page. [O)tBAD DON NEU, AICP Planning Director DN:CG:bd c: Principal Planner, Chris DeCerbo Senior Planner, Van Lynch Project Engineer, Stephen Bobbett File Copy Data Entry e e fiLE COPY ld).JS·Otr. City of Carlsbad I A 61 ,, ,, I 1141 •J§ ·filii; .tg;t M December 15, 2008 Brookfield San Diego Builders, Inc. Attn: Terri McHugh 12865 Pointe Del Mar Street #200 Del Mar Ca, 92014 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF RESTRICTION-PUD 06-12(A) -ROBERSTSON RANCH PA 16 Dear Applicant: Please find the enclosed Notice of Restriction that needs to be signed, notarized, and returned for recordation. This is to fulfill a condition of approval of the Planned Development Permit Amendment. Please ensure the following items are addressed prior to returning the Notice of Restriction: ../ Correct Notary Acknowledgement Required (Effective January 1, 2008, all Certificates of Acknowledgement used by a California notary on a document that will be recorded in the State of California must NOT HAVE "PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME" in the acknowledgement. (Assembly Bill 866, Chapter 399)) ../ Document must be properly notarized . ../ Name on signature page and name on Notarial Acknowledgement must match . ../ Property owner's signatures/initials must be the same as on Notary Acknowledgement. ../ Notary Seal cannot be blurry/too light (County will not record the document if any portion of the Notary Seal is blurry or too light) ../ Include property owner's name in the designated space aboye the owner's signature . ../ Please pay particular attention to the signature requirements at the bottom of the signature page. It is our goal to assist you in getting the Notice of Restriction recorded expeditiously as possible. If you have any questions or need additional assistance, please call Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst at (760) 602-4615 or via email at mmast@ci.carlsbad.ca.us. c: Senior Management Analyst File Copy 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FP.X (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ September 18, 2008 Calavera Hills ll, LLC 2750 Womble Rd. San Diego, CA 92106 • • FILE "OPY a r I s b ad 9,.~0~ City of C 1¥1JFIIIIII.t•i•J§.iiiii•i§IIM PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF DECISION SUBJECT: PUD 06-12(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH PA 16 & PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCHPA 18 At the Planning Commission meeting of September 17, 2008, your application was considered. The Commission voted 6-0-1 to APPROVE your request. The decision of the Planning Commission will become final on September 27, 2008. The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the Planning Director, Don Neu, Secretary of the Planning Commission, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. · If you have any questions regarding the final dispositions of your application, please call the Planning Department at (760) 602-4600. DONNEU Planning Director DN:BK:lt cc: Data Entry File Enclosed: Planning Commission Resolution No. 6461, 6462 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!) • FILE COPY City of Carlsbad IQfhhhlh.i•i§.tiit;•I§IJM August26,2008 Mr. Paul Klukas Planning Systems 1530 Faraday Avenue, Suite 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: PUD 06-12(A) & PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH PA 16 & PA 18 The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be sent to you via email on Wednesday, September 3, 2008, after 8:00 a.m. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on September 8, 2008. A twenty (20) minute appointment has been set aside for you at 10:00 AM. If you have any questions concerning your project you should attend the DCC meeting. It is necessary that you bring your required unmounted colored exhibit(s) with you to this meeting in order for your project to go forward to the Planning Commission. Your colored exhibits must be submitted at this time to ensure review by the Planning Commission at their briefings. If the colored exhibits are not available for their review, your project could be rescheduled to a later time. If you do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s) here by the scheduled time above. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your Planner ~ra M"tnedy at (760) 602-4626. [e~ DON NEU Planning Director DN:BK:sm c: Mr. Norm Drury, Brookfield Homes, 12865 Pointe Del Mar, Suite 200, Del Mar, CA 92014-3859 File Copy Project Engineer Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us <i) I FILE COPY "5 •)'-/·0<:(. bad • • City of Carls IQFIIIIIIII.i•A§·Fiiii•i§iiM August 14, 2008 Mr. Paul Klukas Planning Systems 1530 Faraday Avenue, Ste 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: PUD 06-12(A) and PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH PA 16 and PA 18 Your applications have been tentatively scheduled for a hearing by the Planning Commission on September 17, 2008. However, for this to occur, you must submit the additional items listed below. If the required items are not received by August 25 2008, your project will be rescheduled for a later hearing. In the event the scheduled hearing date is the last available date for the City to comply with the Permit Streamlining Act, and the required items listed below have not been submitted, the project will be scheduled for denial. 1. Please submit the following plans: A} Three full-size copies ·of your site plans, plotting plan, building elevation plans, floor plans, front yard landscape concept plans, on 24" x 36" sheets of paper, stapled in complete sets folded into 9" x 12" size. B) 10 sets for Planning Commission as follows: i} Full-size Engineering drawings. ii) Full-size (24" x 36") colored plotting plan. iii) Full-size front yard landscape concept plan. iv) 11" x 17" reductions of the building elevations and floor plans. C) One 8%" x 11" copy reduction of your plans. These copies must be of a quality which is photographically reproducible. Only essential data should be included on plans. Please note that minor redline corrections are needed on the plans. Please make these corrections before preparing the final sets of plans. 2. As required by Section 65091 of the California Government Code, please submit the following information needed for noticing and sign the enclosed form: A) 600' Owners List - a typewritten list of names and addresses of all property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property, including the applicant and/or owner. The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest equalized assessment rolls. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us <!) . .. • PUD 06-12(A) and PUDY-'14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH PA 16 and PA 18 August 14, 2008 Pa e 2 B) Please include mailing labels for all residents of the Colony. C) Mailing Labels -two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600 foot radius of the subject property. For any address other than a single-family residence, an apartment or suite number must be included. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes -PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. Acceptable fonts are: Arial11 pt, Arial Rounded MT Bold 9 pt, Courier 14 pt, Courier New 11 pt, and MS Line Draw 11 pt. Sample labels are as follows: ACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith 123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3 Carlsbad,CA 92008 ACCEPTABLE (with APN) 209-060-34-00 MRS JANE SMITH APT3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 D) Radius Map - a map to scale, not less than 1" = 200', showing all lots entirely and partially within 600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots should be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owner's list. The scale of the map may be reduced to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale is impractical. E) Fee - a fee shall be paid for covering the cost of mailing notices. Such fee shall equal the current postage rate times the total number of labels. Cash check (payable to the City of Carlsbad) and credit cards are accepted. Sincerely, ~~ Barbara Kennedy, AICP Associate Planner BK:It Attachment C: File Data ' • FfLE COPY City of Carlsbad IQFIIIIIIII·i•J§.iiiii•I§IIM June 27, 2008 Mr. Paul Klukas Planning Systems 1530 Faraday Avenue, Ste 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: PUD 06-12(A) -ROBERTSON RANCH PLANNING AREA 16-CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) APPLICABILITY/ PROCESS DETERMINATION This is to advise you that after reviewing the application for the project referenced above, the City has determined that the following environmer.ttal review process (pursuant to CEQA) will be required for the project: The project is subject to the provisions of CEQA; however, the potential environmental effects of the project were adequately analyzed by the previously certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Robertson Ranch Master Plan (EIR 03-03), dated April 2006, BRG Consulting, Inc. No additional environmental review is required. Please be advised that the City is required to file a Notice of Exemption form with the County Clerk's Office. The County requires a $50 filing fee, which the City collects from the applicant. Two weeks prior to the Planning Commission hearing , please submit a check for $50 payable to San Diego County Clerk to Barbara Kennedy, project planner. For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination, please contact the project planner~'Kennedy, at 760-602-4626 or bkenn@ci.carlsbad.ca.us. Sincerely, /"'\ / .'f . t' 'vut DON NEU Planning Director DN:BK:sm c: Brookfield Homes, Mr. Norm Drury, 12865 Pointe Del Mar, Ste 200, Del Mar, CA 92014- 3859 Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (i} Memorandum Date: June 25, 2008 To: Barbara Kennedy City of Carlsbad's Planning From: James Reviczky -Project Manager Gillespie Moody Patterson, Inc. Re: Robertson Ranch East Village P A-16 Job No. 08-058 (PUD 06-12(A)) Planning a.) Consolidate the conceptual landscape plans on fewer sheets, if possible, by deleting the colored photographs and reducing the size of the site plans. It would be helpful to see the conceptual site plans arranged as a typical street scene. Per your request we have consolidated the plans on fewer sheets and arranged a typical street scene shown on sheet L-1. b.) Include a typical corner lot condition for each Plan. Please refer to sheet L-3 for a typical corner lot condition for each Plan. c.) Specify a concrete mow edge between the turf and shrub areas. Per our phone conversation and e-mail the client will install a shovel cut mow curb for the front yard delineation between turf and shrub areas. d.) Specify a minimum of 2" layer of shredded bark mulch in all planter areas. We have included a note to the planting legends. e.) Do not use Pennisetum in residential areas that are near the open space preserve areas. Per conversation with Mike Elliott, Pennisteum Setaceum 'Rub rum' is a sterile plant that cannot spread by seed or runners and is not considered an invasive species. f.) Please avoid using turf in areas less than 5 ' in width or depth (for example on Plan IX and Plan 3 between the driveway and front walkway). Per your request we have removed the turf in areas less than 5' in width or depth. g.) Please show concept plans for the three alternatives for Plan 2. Please refer to sheet L-2. Coordinate the location of decorative entry walls and the sideyard walls with the Engineer and Architect. Specify if the courtyards will be developer or owner installed. Location of decorative entry walls and sideyard walls have been verified. A note has also been added to specify that the courtyards will be developer installed. page 1 , . Memorandum Date: June 25, 2008 To: Barbara Kennedy City of Carlsbad's Planning From: James Reviczky -Project Manager Gillespie Moody Patterson, Inc. Re: Robertson Ranch East Village P A-16 Job No. 08-058 (PUD 06-12(A)) Landscape Plans(PELA) 1.) Architectural plans provide for 3 themes (Mission, English Country and Italian Tuscany) .... We have clarified on the plans that each planting style is to be used for its corresponding Architectural style. Please refer to plans. 2.) Please indicate where the accent vines are to be used. We have indicated locations of accent vines. Please refer to plans. 3.) Please indicate who will be responsible for maintenance of the front yards. Is this to be homeowner or HOA maintained? All front yards are to be privately maintained. We have included a note to plans. 4.) Please provide general notes for the irrigation design. Address hydrozones, provide a written description of water conservation features including addressing xeriscape principles, overspray, weather controls, etc. Irrigation notes have been added to plans. page2 e e FILE COPY City of Carlsbad I Q Ll ;t II I It~ I •X§ ·til I I; .t§ II M June 4, 2008 Mr. Paul Klukas Planning Systems 1530 Faraday Avenue, Ste 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: 3rd Review for PUD 06-12(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA 16 The items requested from you earlier to make your Planned Development Permit Amendment, application no. PUD 06-12(A), complete have been received and reviewed by the Planning Department. It has been determined that the application is now complete for processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. Please note that although the application is now considered complete, there may be issues that could be discovered during project review and/or environmental review. Any issues should be resolved prior to scheduling the project for public hearing. In addition, the City may request, in the course of processing the application, that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. Please contact your staff planner, jarbara Kennedy,, at (760) 602-4626, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, DON NEU Planning Director DN:BK:sm c: Brookfield Homes, Mr. Norm Drury, 12865 Pointe Del Mar, Ste 200, Del Mar, CA 92014- 3859 Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us (!} PUD06-12(A)-ROBER.N RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA 16 June 4, 2008 Page 2 ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please revise the conceptual landscape plan as follows: • a. Consolidate the conceptual landscape plans on fewer sheets, if possible, by deleting the colored photographs and reducing the size of the site plans. It would be helpful to see the conceptual site plans arranged as a typical street scene. b. Include a typical corner lot condition for each Plan. c. Specify a concrete mow edge between the turf and shrub areas. d. Specify a minimum 2" layer of shredded bark mulch in all planter areas. e. Do not use Penisetum in residential areas that are near the open space preserve areas. f. Please avoid using turf in areas less than 5' in width or depth (for example on Plan 1 B between the driveway and front walkway). g. Please show concept plans for the three alternatives for Plan 2. Coordinate the location of decorative entry walls and the sideyard walls with the Engineer and Architect. Specify if the courtyards will be developer or owner installed. Landscape Plans (PELA): Please make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of the comment concern. 1. Architectural plans provide for 3 themes (Mission, English Country and Italian Tuscany) on each of the different architectural plans. Landscape plans provide one theme plan for each of 4 architectural house plans. It i.s recommended that the plants proposed for each of the 3 themes be used to coordinate with the particular architectural theme as appropriate. It is assumed this is the applicant's intent. Please clarify the intent with a note on the plans. See comment number 5 below. If to be maintained by an HOA, concept plans are needed per the Landscape Manual. 2. Please indicate where the accent vines are to be used. 3. Please indicate who will be responsible for maintenance of the front yards. Is this to be homeowner or HOA maintained? 4. Please provide general notes for the irrigation design. Address hydrozones, provide a written description of water conservation features including addressing xeriscape principles, overspray, weather controls, etc. 5. RETURN REDLINES and provide 3 copies of the landscape concept plans for the next submittal. .. PUD 06-12(A)-ROB.ERT. RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA 16 • June 4, 2008 Pa e3 Engineering: No additional comments. Fire: No comments or conditions for approval. Building: No comments at this time.· -· April28, 2008 Don Neu Planning Director CITY OF CARLSBAD 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 LAND USFJCOASTAL PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCJDTECTURE • LA3900 POUCY AND PROCESSING ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION RE: ROBERTSON RANCH PLANNING AREAS 16 & 18 REQUEST FOR MASTER PLAN REVISIONS Dear Mr. Neu: fn my position as agent for Calavera Hills II, LLC the developer of the Robertson Ranch East Village development, please consider this letter a request by the development applicant for official revisions to the Robertson Ranch Master Plan. These revisions would affect Planning Areas 16 and 18, and as a result of the requirement that PA 14 development with the" Alternative Use" comply with requirements of adjacent PA 16, they would also affect the Alternative Use development of PA14. We are requesting three minor revisions to the wording of the Master Plan. These revisions are listed, and justification provided for each, as follows; 1. Include a Dco.ign Criteria which would eliminate any requirement for 25% t~f the garages to be E'et back 3U feet behind the frmzt property line; Justification: We are informed that the City is expected to eliminate this standard from the next iteration of the Planned Development (P-D) Ordinance due to the fact that the advantages which accrue from implementation of the requirement do not outweigh the disadvantages and costs associated with it. The proposed revision would bring the Master Plan into compliance with the proposed, new P-D Ordinance. 2. Include a Design Criteria which would eliminate any requirement for 25% of the units to be designed with Pasadeua drive·ways; Justification: Similarly to Request n above, we are informed that this requirement is also expected to be eliminated from the proposed P-D Ordinance, and thus the requested revision would bring the Master Plan into compliance with the new P-D Ordinance. 3. Revise the Master Plan design criterion i.L1hich requires at least one elevationlplmz to include a two-car garage with two separate garage doors facing the street. 1530 FARADAY AVENUE • SIDTE 100 • CARLSBAD, CA 92008 • (760) 931-0780 • FAX (760) 931-5744 • info@planningsystems.net Don Neu April 28, 2008 Page2 Justification: This requirement of the Master Plan should be removed because; (a) substantial evidence exists that home purchase customers prefer a single door because the two, small-door alternative is more difficult to maneuver a vehicle into and out of; (b) the two, small-door alternative results in increased difficulty for homeowner pedestrian access into and out of the garage between cars; (c) the two, small-door alternative results in a need for increased garage width, which makes it more difficult to de-emphasize the garage portion of the architecture; (d) the perception by the homeowner customer is that the two, small door alternative adds cost without value to the house, and (e) neither the existing nor the proposed P-D Ordinance includes this provision. In consideration of the above justifications, we request your approval of the referenced revisions, and anticipate that the revisions can be considered an "Administrative Adjustment" per Section V(D) of the Master Plan, and thus will be assessed and approved administratively. Attached are specific revised pages of the Master Plan which we request to replace the existing referenced pages. Please let me know if you need any further information on this matter. u~-y~ Paul j. Klukas Director of Platming cc: Brian Milich David Poole Dale Gleed Don Mitchell Attachments-Proposed Amendment to Text Pages ROBERTSON RANCH MASTER PLAN PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO TEXT PAGES PLANNING AREAS 16 & 18 CALA VERA HILLS II, LLC APRIL 28, 2008 DELETE (Strike-Out) ADD (Bold) III. DEVELOPMENT AND Robertson Ranch REGULATORY PROVISIONS Minimum Lot Size The minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet, except for lots within Planning Area 18 which abut Cannon Road where a minimum lot size of 4,500 square feet shall be permitted. Minimum Lot dimensions Setbacks Minimum lot width at the front setback line shall be 50 feet, except along cul de sacs where the minimum lot width shall be 35 feet, measured at the curb. Minimum lot depth shall be 90 feet as measured pursuant to section 21.04.255 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. A 40-foot structural setback shall be provided from the right-of-way on Cannon Road. A 40-foot structural setback shall be provided from the right-of-way on College Boulevard. A minimum of 7 5 percent of the required setback that is located closest to Cannon Road and 50 percent of the required setback that is located closest to College Boulevard shall be landscaped to enhance the street scene and buffer the homes from traffic on adjacent arterials. Project perimeter walls shall not be located in the landscaped buffer. RV Parking R V Parking shall be provided concurrent with development as required by the Planned Development Ordinance and shall be provided in either P A 2 or as provided for in Master Plan Section II.E.5. Affordable Housing The Inclusionary Housing requirements for Planning Areas 16, 1 7 and 18 shall be provided in Planning Areas 14 and/or 15, or in any other Planning Area approved by the City of Carlsbad, concurrent with the schedule established by an Affordable Housing Agreement for the East Village. Special Design Criteria 1. Planning Areas 17 and 18: A supplemental acoustical analysis shall be provided with the discretionary applications demonstrating compliance with the City's Noise Guidelines Manual for Interior and Exterior Noise Levels. 2. Each planning area shall have a separate Planned Unit Development Permit and shall be designed with unique floor plans and architectural design. Robertson Ranch Master Plan April 28, 2008 Page III-97 III. DEVELOPMENT AND Robertson Ranch REGULATORY PROVISIONS 3. At least 20 percent of the homes in these planning areas shall be designed as single- story. Single story is defined as a maximum plate-line of 15 feet and a maximum <' building height of 20 feet. Lofts are permitted subject to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.04.330. Alternatively, a total of 25 percent of the homes in each neighborhood shall be designed as either single-story or modified single story homes, provided that no fewer than 15 percent of the of the homes in the planning area are designed as single-story homes. Homes designed as modified single story homes shall conform to the following criteria: • Modified Single Storv. To qualify as a Modified Single-Story homes, the structure must comply with the following criteria: A minimum of 60 percent of the area of the roof shall be single story. A two-story element may be added in the central portion of the front and rear elevation. For modified single story, the livable space on the second floor shall not exceed 25 percent of the first floor lot coverage. The single story or Modified Single-Story units are intended to be strategically located in the lotting scheme, and distributed throughout the village. 4. Doors, porches, balconies and walkways should face the streets, to the extent possible, to promote social interaction along the streetscape. 5. Porches shall have a minimum depth of 6 feet and a minimum width of 10 feet. 6. Building elevations visible from the surrounding roadways shall feature enhanced elevations. 7. Side-loaded garages are encouraged to vary the street theme. 8. Three-in-a-row car garages that directly face the street shall not be allowed. 9. (DELETE) At least eae elez,•atiea/f!laa shall iaelt!ele a PNe ear garage with twe sef!arate gaFage eleefS faeiag the street. 10. Single-story and modified single-story homes shall be considered as two separate floor plans. 11. The use of perimeter roadways which form a buffer between residential and open space land uses shall be encouraged. Where this situation occurs, a pedestrian trail is recommended along the open space side of the roadway. 12. Recreation facilities shall be integrated into the trail system and should be sited to take advantage of views where feasible. 13. Pedestrian connections shall be included to facilitate access to bus stops and adjoining neighborhoods. Robertson Ranch Master Plan April 28, 2008 Page III-98 III. DEVELOPMENT AND Robertson Ranch REGULATORY PROVISIONS 14. Traffic calming elements shall be incorporated into the design of internal drives within / this Planning Area in order to reduce the speed of through traffic and enhance pedestrian safety. Examples of traffic calming elements that are appropriate for this planning area include the use of traffic circles at intersections, "T" intersections, reduced-width streets, and/or the incorporation of medians, enhanced paving, and/or landscape elements at pedestrian crossings (Figures IV-3 and IV-4, Traffic Calming Details). 15. A 5-foot wide landscape buffer area shall be provided between side or rear fences and adjacent roadways. 16. Planning Area 18: An enhanced 10-foot landscape buffer shall be provided along the east side of Street "0". This area shall be designed as a primary community sidewalk/trail for pedestrian use and will provide a connection between Street "0" and the Community Recreation area in PA 19. Building setbacks shall be measured from the edge of the landscape buffer closest to the residences. 17. Landscape focal points should be provided at the end of cul-de-sac streets and "T" intersections. 18. When noise walls over 6 feet high are required, a combination of berm and maximum 6- foot high noise wall shall be used to mitigate noise impacts. 19. Optional entry treatments, as depicted on Figure III-36, Conceptual Neighborhood Entry Plan, and Figure III-37, Conceptual Neighborhood Entry Elevation, may be provided at the entrances to Planning Areas 16, 17 and 18, as depicted on Figure III-30, Key to Entries, Signs and Edge Conditions. 20. Special monumentation may be provided at the intersection of Cannon Road and College Boulevard and/or at the northeastern comer of Planning Area 17, as depicted on Figure III-30, Key to Entries, Signs and Edge Conditions, and Figure III-31, Community Entry Feature. 21. The Master HOA shall maintain landscaping within the parkways, recreation areas, and fuel modification zones. 22. A Fire Protection Zone, as defined in Section III.B.4.(e) (Figure III-48, Fuel Modification Plan) of this Master Plan shall be provided. 23. Landscaping in areas adjacent to open space areas (Planning Area 23D) shall be compatible with preserved native vegetation. 24. Lighting adjacent to the Open Space areas (Planning Area 23D) shall be selectively placed, shielded, and directed away from conserved habitat. Robertson Ranch Master Plan April 28, 2008 Page III-99 III. DEVELOPMENT AND Robertson Ranch REGULATORY PROVISIONS 25. The 20 feet behind the face of curb on the north side of Cannon Road is designated as a pipe zone for the 84-inch storm drain and no planting of trees is allowed. However, the i planting of shrubs and the placement of the meandering sidewalk and an increase of grade of 2 feet above the top of curb will be allowed in the pipe zone. The project wall along the north side of Cannon Road is to be placed at 40 feet from the face of curb (30 feet from the right-of-way) and trees are allowed in the 20-to 40-foot zone behind the face of curb. 26. In addition to the standards listed above, the Design Guidelines provided in Section IIIB of this Master Plan also shall apply. 27. (ADD NEW WORDING AS FOLLOWS) Small lot single family development proposed in Planning Areas 16 and 18 shall comply with the applicable development standards of the Planned Development Ordinance (21.45.070) except as otherwise allowed in this Master Plan, including (a) no requirement that an additional 25 percent of aU units include garages that are located a minimum of 30 feet behind the front property line, and (b) no requirement that 25 percent of all driveways must be designed as "Pasadena" driveways with grass or enhanced pavement in the middle. Robertson Ranch Master Plan April 28, 2008 Page III-100 R.£frrJV Ff' p,~ uP o~fA}ve • FILE COP\ City of Carlsbad I #j 6 I; I; I I; t.I•X§ ·II I I I .t§; I M February 20, 2008 Mr. Norm Drury Brookfield Homes 12865 Pointe Del Mar, Ste 200 Del Mar, CA 92014-3859 SUBJECT: 2ND REVIEW FOR PUD 06-12(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA 16 All of the items requested of you earlier have not been received and therefore your application is still deemed incomplete. Listed below are the item(s) still needed in order to deem your application as complete. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans. No processing .of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decisioh on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, August 31, 2007, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Barbara Kennedy, at (760) 602-4626, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, ~/t DON NEU Planning Director DN:BK:sm c: Chris DeCerbo, Team Leader Glen Van Peski, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us i) --------------~--------------------------------- ·. i:>Lo o6c 12(A) -ROBE.ION RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA 16 • February 20, 2008 Page2 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: (new comments are in BOLD) ..; 1. 2"d request: Please submit drawings for the enhanced side elevations of the homes that face street sideyards and on elevations facing circulation element roadways, recreation areas, or open space . ./ 2. 2"d Request: For each Planning Area, please provide a colored plotting plan showing how the various architectural styles will be plotted (provide a separate . coiT!posite for each PA). v 3. "2"d request: The architectural design is required to comply with the Planned Development Ordinance, City Council Policy 44 and City Council Policy 66, except as modified by the MP (Please contact your staff planner for a template of these tables). Items that do not appear to meet the standards are as follows: ./A. Please provide documentation demonstrating compliance with the Planned Development Ordinance-Table D. . " 1. Please show compliance with the current Planned Development Ordinance requirement for 25% of the floor plans to have a garage that is setback a minimum of 30 feet from the property line. ad,..,~" 1'-'P ll~ ..... tJ-..,;:9 ~ B. Master Plan: • 1. Porches shall have a minimum depth of 6 feet and a minimum width of 1 0 feet (not including entryway to front door). Plan 1 and 1X do not qualify. Please change the word "PORCH" to "ENTRY" on the floor plans . ../ 2. At least one elevation/plan shall include a two-car garage with two separate garage doors facing the street. None comply.-Please submit an application for a Minor MP amendment. C. City Council Policy 44 2"d request: Please provide documentation demonstrating compliance with City Council Policy 44 (Please contact your staff planner for a template of these tables). Areas of concern are as follows: 1. Demonstrate compliance with the "Single-story Requirements" (Items 7, 8, 9). 2. Demonstrate compliance with "Multiple Building Planes" (Items 10, 11 and 12). 3, Fifty percent (50%) of the homes shall be designed with a covered front porch, open courtyard (visible from the street) or balcony located at the front of the building (Item 15). Plan 1 does not comply with this requirement. Plan 1X does not meet this requirement, but could be redesigned with a balcony on the second floor. Plan 2, Lots 44, 63, 160, 173, 189, and Lot 89 (if reversed) could be designed to meet this requirement (see comments under issues of concern). Plan 3 complies with this requirement. Currently, with the e PUD 06-12(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA16 February 20, 2008 Page 3 suggested modifications to Plan 2, only 35 homes (41%) would meet this requirement. 4. Seventy-five (75%) of the homes must have a front entry to the home that is clearly visible from the street (Item 16). All of the Plan 1, Plan 1X, and Pbm 3 meet this requirement. Plan 2 on Lots 44, 63, 160, 173, 189, and Lot 89 (if reversed) could be designed to meet this requirement. Currently, with the suggested modifications to Plan 2, only 59 homes (69.4%) would meet this requirement D. City Council Policy 66 2"d request: Please provide documentation demonstrating compliance with City Council Policy 66 (Please contact your staff planner for a template of these tables). Areas of concern are as follows: 1. Building Facades, Front Entries and Porches -building entries and windows should face the street. Front porches, bay windows, courtyards and balconies are encouraged. 3. New Comment: Please include landscape plans for the front yard landscapjng. The fencing plans may need to be modified relative to the structures. Please coordinate between the Architect and Landscape Architect. Engineering: None. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. New comment: The plotting plan has been revised so now, two-story homes are located on the majority of the corner lots. Please revise the site plan to a layout that is more consistent with the previous plan. Using one-story plans (or modified single-story) adjacent to the corner lots reduces the visual impact of the buildings along the street. It is recommended that the Plan 1 should be used adjacent to the pocket park wherever possible. 2. 2"d Request: The proposed architectural designs do not appear to incorporate the design elements shown in the MP to a level of detail which fully captures the architectural themes. Recommendations include the following: a. Incorporate the accent building materials (stone, brick, etc) into the rear elevation and as a more prominent part of the front fac;ade. b. Emphasize the front entry elements. Incorporate true porches into the Plan 1 or add a second floor balcony to Plan 1X. c. Garage doors should be unique to each architectural style. PUD 06-12(A)-ROBER,ON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA16 • February 20, 2008 Page4 d. Please refer to the 11 x 17 redlines plans for additional comments related to the architectural design. Please return all redlines with your next submittal. 3. 2"d request: Residences should be plotted so that rooms with exterior views and/or exterior access are oriented towards the larger sideyard or open space. In some instances it is recommended that the units should be shifted, reversed, or replaced with a different floor plan. This would also result in a public view of the "more enhanced" side elevation of each unit. Please see redlines for recommendations. Consider reversing the units on Lots 89, 117, 130, and 179. 4. 2"d request: PA 16 -Consider designing some of the units with a balcony option, especially for units that can take advantage of views out over the open space. Engineers Plan (new comments): 5. Delete the reference to PA 14 recreation area 011 the cover sheet. 6. On the cover sheet, please provide data specific to PA 16 as requested (see redlines). 7. Please plot the entry portico on the Plan 28 and plan 2 C. 8. Please include a sidewalk to the entrance on the Plan 1 rather than using the driveway as the entrance to the residence. Consider providing a direct connection from the public sidewalk to the front entrance where possible. Please coordinate with the architect. 9. Coordinate with the architect to show the courtyard walls for Plan 1 and the courtyard design for Plan 2. 10. Some of the dimensions on the plotting plans are difficult to read. Please see Engineering redlines for dimensions that are missing or are unclear. Please return all redlines with your next submittal. General (new comment): 11. The lot coverage for some of the two-story units approaches the 45% maximum. Disclosers will need to be provided clearly stating that future additions may not result in a lot coverage that exceeds 45% of the net pad area for two-story structures and 60% of the net pad area for one-story and modified one-story structures. Engineering: 1. Use the current APN. 2. Revise the BMP table. 3. Adjust the street light locations per current plans. 4. Show the recorded Map No. on Sheet 4. 5. See redlines for additional comments. Please return with your next submittal. e . PUD 06-12(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PA16 February 20, 2008 Page 5 Fire: No additional comments. Building: 1. Construction of the units shall comply with the 2007 California Building Code. • • McMillin Land Development A Corky McMillin Company January 2nd, 2008 1 ,1 ·, ,. ,1 ~~ ' ," I' ~~"'~ .. ) Barbara Kennedy City of carlsbad 1635 Faraday Avenue carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 CITYOFc PLAN N INGARDLSBAD EPT SUBJECT: PUD 06-12(A) and 06-14(A) -ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PAs 16 and 18 (Amendments) The following list of items is in response to the staff comments in the City response letter of September 28, 2007. We have chosen to separate the process for PA 16 & 18 from PA 17 as these areas are anticipated to be built by different homebuilders and they also utilize different architects. Additionally, the architectural designs for PA 16 & 18 were completed utilizing the new PD Ordinance, which has yet to go into effect due to the pending approval by CA Coastal Commission. We understand that if these neighborhoods go to hearing prior to ordinance adoption, they will require a concurrent minor master plan amendment. Planning (Items needed to complete application) : 1. Acoustical analysis for PA 18 is included herein. 2. Lot coverage has been adjusted to comply with the Master Plan allowance. 3. Sidewalks to front entrances added to PUD plotting plans. 4. Summary of average setbacks for PA 16 & 18 added to engineering plans. 5. Colored plotting plan showing plan-type by architectural style provided. 6. PA 17 item; does not apply here. 7. PA 16 & 18 now comply as detailed below: A. Master Plan 1. PA 16/18 changed to reflect unique floor plans & design 2. Provence theme for PA 18 has been changed. 3. Italian style has been changed to include Tuscan detailing. 4. Plan-1X for PA 16/18 second-story element has been modified. 5. Calculation for 60% of single-story roof for Plan-1X provided. 6. Porch dimension of 6xl0' complied with. 7. Brookfield Homes has indicated they would like to ask for relief from this requirement. B. Council Policy 44 1. Single-story compliance demonstrated. 2. Multiple building planes compliance demonstrated. 3. PA 16 & 18 modified to comply with 50% requirement for covered front porch, open courtyard, or balcony located at front of building. 4. PA 16 modified to comply with 75% requirement for front entry to building visible from street. c. Council Policy 66 1. This item has been complied with. Planning (Issues of Concern) : 1. While we understand staff's concern here, it is impractical from a construction cost standpoint to provide all five allowed architectural styles. The standard among builders and the most successful from a marketing aspect, when taking into account cost, is to provide no more than three styles of architecture. 2. Architectural designs modified to provide: a. Accent materials have been incorporated into rear elevations and enhanced in the front facades. ~~.\\ McMillin Realty ~~.\\ ~~.\\ ~~.\\ McMillin Mortgage McMillin Land Development McMillin Homes Mailing Address: P.O. Box 8511)4 • San Diego, CA 92186-5104 2750 Womble Road • San Diego, CA 92106 TEL (619) 477-4117 ·FAX (619) 336-3119 www.mcmillin.com ~~.\\ McMillin Commercial • • b. True porches have been added to PA 16 & 18 plans. c. PA 17 item; does not apply here. d. Recommendations for changes to English Country elevations have been incorporated. See elevations. Although Brookfield has provided English Country elevations, they may not have incorporated all of Ms. Kennedy's specific comments. e. Recommendations for changes to Mission (Spanish) style elevations in PA 16 & 18 have been incorporated. f. California Monterrey/Bungalow theme has been incorporated. g. Enhanced elevations on sides which face streets, roadways, rec areas, etc. will be included and are detailed as such on engineer's plans. h. Garage doors have been modified per request. i. Required 392 SF of storage space is now shown on all the plans which do not have a third-car garage tandem space. 3. Changes made per request. 4. Plotting revised per comment and per redline comments on PUD plans. 5. Some PA 16 units have been redesigned with a balcony option. Brookfield Homes has balconies on PA 16 Plan 2 (Italian) and Plan 3 (Mission & Italian). Brookfield has a balcony on the PA 18 Plan 2 (Mission) elevations. 6. PA 17 item; does not apply here. 7. PA 17 item; does not apply here. 8. Dimensions on plotting plan revised to provide ease of interpretation. 9. Required useable rear yard open space dimensions now shown on all PUD plot plans. 10.All offsets and dimensions are now detailed on floor plans per Staff comments. 11. Redlines included herein. Engineering (Issues of Concern): PA 16 1. Application number added. 2. Legal description revised to show recorded Master Final Map. 3. water quality note on PA 20 revised. 4. Driveway location conflicts revised per CT 04-26. 5. Lot line discrepancy configuration revised per CT 04-26. 6. Redlines included herein. PA 17 -does not apply here PA 18 1. Application number added. 2. Legal description revised to show recorded Master Final Map. 3. Water quality note on PA 20 revised. 4. Driveway location conflicts revised per CT 04-26. 5. Street names added on sheet-4. 6. Lot 264 revised to correct driveway shown on 433-6. 7. Ped connection at Cannon east of lot 286 revised per CT 04-26 on sheet-S. 8. Lot line discrepancy configuration revised per CT 04-26. 9. Redlines included herein. 2 • • If you have any questions or wish to discuss further, please contact me at 619-794-1286. Thank you. 4< L j/i--.. --- ~h Gates ~~~:~avera Hills II, LLC £.-/./ The Corky McMillin Companies 3 • • FILE COPY 10·5·01 City of Carlsbad IQFhhilet.i•I§.JEIIJI.t§bl September 28, 2007 Josh Gates Calavera Hills II, LLC P. 0. Box 85104 San Diego, CA 92186-5104 SUBJECT: PUD 06-12(A)/PUD 06-13(A)/PUD 06-14(A) -ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PAS16, 17 AND 18 Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Planned Development Permit amendments, application nos. PUD 06-12(A), PUD 06-13(A), and PUD 06-14(A), as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. Attached are two lists. The first list is information which must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to your staff planner by appointment. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittals, including five (5) sets of plans and three (3) reduced sets of architectural plans (11x17). No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. The second list is issues of concern to staff. When all required materials are submitted the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, August 31, 2007, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact your staff planner, Barbara Kennedy, at (760) 602-4626, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, ~~ DON NEU Planning Director DN:BK:It c: Gary Barberio, Team Leader Jeremy Riddle, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us @ PUD 06-12(A)/PUD 06-13(A)/PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PAS16, 17 AND 18 September 28, 2007 Pa e 2 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: 1. Please provide a supplemental interior acoustical analysis for Planning Areas (PAs) 17 and 18 as required by the EIR 03-03 mitigation measures. 2. In PAs 16 and 18, the Lot Coverage appears to exceed the Master Plan (MP) allowance of 45% coverage of the net lot area for two-story homes. Please refer to page 111-86 of the MP for allowed lot coverage exclusions for covered entryways or porches with no livable space above the porch or entryway. If balconies are proposed, they will need to be included in the lot coverage calculations. Please revise the floor plans accordingly to meet design concerns and lot coverage issues. 3. Please show the sidewalks to the front entrances on the plotting plan. 4. On the Engineer's plans, please provide a summary of the average front setback for PAs 16, 17 and 18. 5. For each Planning Area, please provide a colored plotting plan showing how the various architectural styles will be plotted (provide a separate composite for each PA). 6. Please provide roof plans for PA 17 in the same format as those shown for PAs 16 and 18. 7. The architectural design is required to comply with the Planned Development Ordinance, City Council Policy 44 and City Council Policy 66, except as modified by the MP. Please provide documentation demonstrating compliance with the Planned Development Ordinance-Table D. (Please contact your staff planner for a template of these tables) Items that do not appear to meet the standards are as follows: A Master Plan: 1. Each PA shall be designed with unique floor plans and architectural design. PA 16 and 18 appear very similar in character to each other. 2. The "French" theme in PA 17 and the "Provence" theme in PA 18 are not included in the allowed architectural styles. 3. The "Italian" styles in all of the Planning Areas should be designed with a more "Tuscan" style detailing. 4. The Plan 1X in PAs 16 and 18 needs to be redesigned so that the two story element is located in the central portion of the front and rear elevation, in accordance with the MP (see page 111-88). The Plan 1X in PA 17 appears to comply with this requirement. 5. Please provide a calculation on all of the "Plan 1X" floor plans showing that a minimum of 60% of the roof is single-story. PUD 06-12(A)/PUD 06-13(A)/PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PAS16, 17 AND 18 September 28, 2007 Pa e 3 6. Porches shall have a minimum depth of 6 feet and a minimum width of 10 feet (not including entryway to front door). 7. At least one elevation/plan shall include a two-car garage with two separate garage doors facing the street. (PAs 16 and 18 do not comply with this requirement) B. City Council Policy 44 1. Demonstrate compliance with the "Single-story Requirements" (Items 7, 8, 9). 2. Demonstrate compliance with "Multiple Building Planes" (Items 10, 11 and 12). 3. Fifty percent (50%) of the homes shall be designed with a covered front porch, open courtyard (visible from the street) or balcony located at the front of the building (Item 15). PAs 16 and 18 do not comply with this requirement. ' 4. Seventy-five (75%) of the homes must have a front entry to the home that is clearly visible from the street (Item 16). PA 16 does not comply with this requirement. C. City Council Policy 66 1. Building Facades, Front Entries and Porches -building entries and windows should face the street. Front porches, bay windows, courtyards and balconies are encouraged. Engineering: None. ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Five architectural themes are allowed in the MP (see Page 111-115): California Monterrey, California Bungalow, English Country, Mission Style and Italian Tuscany. In order to provide more variety, it is recommended that all of the architectural themes be utilized within each Planning Area, rather than only three types as proposed. It would also help to reinforce the California Bungalow design theme used for the pool house (in PA 19) by providing this architectural style within the single-family residential areas of the East Village. 2. The proposed architectural designs do not appear to incorporate the design elements· shown in the MP to a level of detail which fully captures the architectural themes. Recommendations include the following: a. Incorporate the accent building materials (stone, brick, etc) into the rear elevation and as a more prominent part of the front fa<;ade. PUD 06-12(A)/PUD 06-13(A)/PUD 06-14(A) -ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PAS16, 17 AND 18 September 28, 2007 Pa e4 b. Emphasize the front entry elements. Incorporate true porches into the plans for PA 16 and 18. c. For the "Italian Tuscany" style, add arched garage doorways, decorative wood corbels, and additional stone wainscot accents. The PA 17 elevations do not appear to have a 'Tuscan" style. d. The "English Country" style elevations should have a more vertical massing form with steeper roof elements or an asymmetrical "saltbox" style roof pitch at the front entry. Use additional decorative elements on the front and rear elevations including wood accents on gable roof ends, dormer windows, arched elements, exposed rafter tails, and door/window corbel details. e. The "Mission" (Spanish) style in PA 16 and 18 should be modified to incorporate additional arched elements in the front and rear elevations. Add details to exposed gabled ends where possible. Please continue the foam eave around all sides of the buildings in PA 17. In general, the "Mission" elevations could use additional enhancements at windows including decorative iron elements or other decorative features. f. For variety, change some of the Plan 1, 2 and 3 elevations to the "California Monterrey" and "California Bungalow" styles. g. Enhanced elevations should be provided on all street sideyard elevations and on side elevations facing circulation element roadways, recreation areas, or open space. h. Garage doors should be unique to each architectural style. i. Please show 392 square feet of storage area within each garage. The tandem spaces may count towards this requirement. In areas where the garage is only 20' x 20', provide an overhead or wall storage system. 3. Staff is available to discuss the suggested architectural modifications in more detail. In addition, it is likely that modifications to the floor plans wjJ] be required for PA 16 and 18 in order to meet the requirements for lot coverage, modified second-stories, and front porches. 4. Residences should be plotted so that rooms with exterior views and/or exterior access are oriented towards the larger sideyard or open space. In some instances it is recommended that the units should be shifted, reversed, or replaced with a different floor plan. This would also result in a public view of the "more enhanced" side elevation of each unit. Please see redlines for recommendations. 5. PA 16 -Consider designing some of the units with a balcony option, especially for units that can take advantage of views out over the open space. 6. PA 17 -Please use 24x36 sheets for the architectural plans. 7. Please dash in the general location of the sideyard fencing on the PA 17 elevations (similar to PAs 16 and 18). • PUD 06-12(A)/PUD 06-13(A)/PUD 06-14(A) -ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PAS16, 17 AND 18 September 28, 2007 Pa e5 8. Some of the dimensions on the plotting plans are difficult to read. Please see redlines for dimensions that are missing or are unclear. 9. Somewhere on the plans (Engineer's, Architect's, or both) the required usable rear yard open space dimensions should be defined (15' x 15' for single-story and modified single story; 18' x 18' for two-story) 10. Please dimension all off-sets and dimensions on the floor plans. See 11 x 17 red lines plans for additional comments. 11. Please return all redlines with your next submittal. Engineering: Planning Area 16 1. Revise the exhibits to include the current the application number in the upper right hand corner (typical). Refer to red lines for clarification. 2. Revise the legal description to list the recently recorded map no for CT 02-16. 3. Revise the water quality note to specify PA 20 contains the vegetated swale. 4. Revise the exhibits to address the discrepancies in driveway locations as compared to driveways shown on CT 04-26. Refer to redlines for clarification. Staff hopes to understand which location is correct. 5. Revise the TM to address the discrepancy in lot line configuration as compared to CT 04-26. Which is correct? Refer to red lines for clarification. 6. Address redlines as noted on the returned exhibits. Please be advised, this check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. Planning Area 17 1. Revise the exhibits to include the current the application number in the upper right hand corner (typical). Refer to redlines for clarification. 2. Revise the legal description to list the recently recorded map no for CT 02-16. 3. Revise the water quality note to specify PA 20 contains the vegetated swale. 4. Address redlines as noted on the returned exhibits. Please be advised, this check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. Planning Area 18 1. Revise the exhibits to include the current the application number in the upper right hand corner (typical). Refer to redlines for clarification. PUD 06-12(A)/PUD 06-13(A)/PUD 06-14(A)-ROBERTSON RANCH EAST VILLAGE PAS16, 17 AND 18 September 28, 2007 Pa e 6 2. Revise the legal description to list the recently recorded map no for CT 02-16. 3. Revise the water quality note to specify PA 20 contains the vegetated swale. 4. Revise the exhibits to address the discrepancies in driveway locations as compared to driveways shown on CT 04-26. Refer to redlines for clarification. Staff hopes to understand which location is correct. 5. On sheet 4, add street names for clarity. 6. On sheet 5, the driveway for lot 264 should be a 12-ft driveway as shown on recent construction changes for drawing 433-6. The exhibits do not match 12-ft. Please address this discrepancy. 7. On sheet 5, the pedestrian connection with Cannon just east of lot 286 does not match recent configurations shown on CT 04-26. Please address this discrepancy. 8. Revise the TM to address the discrepancy in lot line configuration as compared to · CT 04-26. Which is correct? Refer to red lines for clarification. 9. Address redlines as noted on the returned exhibits. Please be advised, this check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review.