HomeMy WebLinkAboutPUD 15-17; Garfield Custom Beach Homes; Planned Unit Development - Non-Residential (PUD) (3)APPLICATIONS APPLIED FOR: (CHECK BOXES)
LAND USE REVIEW
APPLICATION
P-1
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
(760) 602-4610
www.carlsbadca.gov
Development Permits (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY} Legislative Permits (FOR DEPT. USE ONLY)
\ ( ~· Coastal Development Permit (*) 0 Minor
0 Conditional Use Permit (*)
0 Minor 0 Extension
0 Day Care (Large)
0 Environmental Impact Assessment
0 Habitat Management Permit 0 Minor
0 Hillside Development Permit(*) 0 Minor
0 Nonconforming Construction Permit
~/Pianoed Development Permit 0 Minor Ga'~esidential 0 Non-Residential
0 Planning Commission Determination
0 Reasonable Accommodation
Gj/ Site Development Plan 0 Minor
0 Special Use Permit .. [H .. ~ Tentative Parcel Map (Minor Subdivision)
0 Tentative Tract Map (Major Subdivision)
0 Variance 0 Minor
c~>t:>r
1~--o~l
"P'-LD
\S---t·1
~pp I C'",:) --I ~
MS i 7'}--1\
0 General Plan Amendment
0 Local Coastal Program Amendment (*)
0 Master Plan
0 Specific Plan
0 Zone Change (*)
0 Amendment
0 Amendment
0 Zone Code Amendment
South Carlsbad Coastal Review Area Permits
0 Review Permit
0 Administrative 0 Minor 0 Major
Village Review Area Permits
0 Review Permit
0 Administrative 0 Minor 0 Major
(*) = eligible for 25% discount
NOTE: A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 3:30P.M. A PROPOSED PROJECT REQUIRING ONLY ONE
APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 4:00P.M.
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO(S).: 204-270-04-00
PROJECT NAME:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Demolish existing SFR and detached garage and build two new three story SFR's with condominium ownership
BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 in block "M" of Palisades in the city of Carlsbad, County of Diego, State of California
LOCATION OF PROJECT: 3806 Garfield Street
ON THE: East
(NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, VIlEST)
BETWEEN Hemlock --------------------------(NAME OF STREET)
P-1
STREET ADDRESS
SIDE OF Garfield Street
(NAME OF STREET)
AND Redwood
(NAME OF STREET)
Paoe 1 of 6 Revised 07/15
OV/NER NAME
(Pdnt): RREG Investments Series, LLC Series 1019
MAILING ADDRESS: 3005 S El Camino Real
CITY, STATE, ZIP: San Clemente, CA 92672
TELEPHONE: 949-637-3254 ---------------------------EMAIL ADDRESS: kdunn@rincongrp.com
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE
INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE. I CERTIFY AS LEGAL OWNER THAT THE APPLICANT AS
SET FORTH HEREIN IS MY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR
PURPOS S OF THIS APPLICATION.
SIGN
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE (Print):
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY, STATE, ZIP:
TELEPHONE:
EMAIL ADDRESS:
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT FOR
PURPOSES OF THIS APPLICATION AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE
INFORMATION IS TRU~. A~ORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KN~~~ SIG~~z DA.; :s-II;,
APPLICANT NAME (Print): Kevin Dunn -----------------------MAILING ADDRESS: 3005 S El Camino Real
CITY, STATE, ZIP: San Clemente, CA 92672
TELEPHONE: 949-637-3254 ----------------------------EMAIL ADDRESS: kdunn@rincongrp.com
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER
AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF, PLANNING
COMMISSIONERS OR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO INSPECT AND ENTER THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS
APPLICATION. IMIE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE.
NOTICE OF RESTRICTION: PROPERTY OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES AND CONSENTS TO A NOTICE OF RESTRICTION BEING
RECORDED ON THE TITLE TO HIS PROPERTY IF CONDITIONED FOR THE APPLICANT. NOTICE OF RESTRICTIONS RUN WITH
THE LAND AND BIND ANY SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST.
~~i[J:::::::GNATURE
FOR CITY USE ONLY
RECEIVED BY:
I C ~~ -<JexJ_
P-1 Page 2 of6 Revised 07/15
APPLICANT NAME:
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
P-1(8)
Plannlns Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
(760) 602-4610
www.carlsbadca.gov
Please describe fully the proposed project by application type. Include any details necessary to
adequately explain the scope and/or operation of the proposed project. You may also include
any background information and supporting statements regarding the reasons for, or
appropriateness of, the application. Use an addendum sheet if necessary.
Description/Explanation:
a
P-1(8) Page 1 of 1 Revised 07/10
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
P-1(A)
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
(760) 602-4610
www.carlsbadca.gov
Applicant's statement or disclosure of certain ownership interests on all applications which will
require discretionary action on the part of the City Council or any appointed Board, Commission
or Committee.
The following information MUST be disclosed at the time of application submittal. Your project
cannot be reviewed until this information is completed. Please print.
Note:
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal
organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, in this and any other county, city and county,
city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
Agents may sign this document; however, the legal name and entity of the applicant and property owner
must be provided below.
1. APPLICANT (Not the applicant's agent)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having a
financial interest in the application. If the applicant includes a corporation or partnership,
include the names, titles, addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the
shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE
INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned
corporation, include the names, titles, and addresses of the corporate officers. (A
separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Kevin Dunn Corp/Part RREG Investments Series, LLC Series 1019
Title Managing Member Title _____________ _
Address 3005 s El Camino Real, San Clemente, CA 92672 Address 3005 S El Camino Real, San Clemente, CA 92672
2. OWNER (Not the owner's agent)
P-1 (A)
Provide the COMPLETE, LEGAL names and addresses of ALL persons having any
ownership interest in the property involved. Also, provide the nature of the legal
ownership (i.e., partnership, tenants in common, non-profit, corporation, etc.). If the
ownership includes a corporation or partnership, include the names, titles, addresses of
all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares. IF NO INDIVIDUALS OWN MORE
THAN 10% OF THE SHARES, PLEASE INDICATE NON-APPLICABLE (N/A) IN THE
SPACE BELOW. If a publicly-owned corporation, include the names, titles, and
addresses of the corporate officers. (A separate page may be attached if necessary.)
Person Kevin Dunn, Cameron St. Clair, Tom St. Clair
Title Members
Address 3005 S El Camino Real
San Clemente, CA 92672
Corp/Part RREG Investments Series, LLC Series 1019
Title _____________ _
Address 3005 S El Camino Real
San Clemente, CA 92672
Page 1 of 2 Revised 07/10
3. NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION OR TRUST
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a nonprofit organization or a trust,
list the names and addresses of ANY person serving as an officer or director of the non-
profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the.
Non ProfiUTrust Non ProfiUTrust _________ _
Title ____________ _ Title _____________ _
Address _________ _ Address. ___________ _
4. Have you had more than $500 worth of business transacted with any member of City
staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12)
months?
DYes II' I No If yes, please indicate person(s): __________ _
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
I certify that all the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
(2-r~ :t7v~i'A"P..,rr ~ ~...U--~...t-.~t~ !LcVF?v bv..yY
Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant
Signature of owner/applicant's agent if applicable/date
Print or type name of owner/applicant's agent
P-1(A) Page 2 of 2 Revised 07/10
HAZARDOUS WASTE
AND SUBSTANCES
STATEMENT
P-1(C)
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
(760) 602-4610
www.carlsbadca.gov
Consultation of Lists of Sites Related to Hazardous Wastes
(Certification of Compliance with Government Code Section 65962.5)
Pursuant to State of California Government Code Section 65962.5, I have consulted the
Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List compiled by the California Environmental
Protection Agency and hereby certify that (check one):
[I] The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on the
lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code.
D The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application !f! contained on the lists
compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the State Government Code.
APPLICANT
Name: Kevin Dunn
Address: 3005 S El Camino Real
San Clemente, CA 92672
Phone Number: 949-637-3254
Address of Site: 3806 Garfield Street
PROPERTY OWNER
RREG Investments Series, LLC Series 1019 Name: __________ _
Address: 3005 S El Camino Real
San Clemente, CA 92672
Phone Number: 949-637-3254
Local Agency (City and County):_C_a_rl_s_b_a_d __________________ _
Assessor's book, page, and parcel number:_2_0_4_-_2_7_0_-0_4_-0_0 ____________ _
Specify list(s): _____________________________ _
Regulatory Identification Number: ______________________ _
Date of List: _____________________________ _
Applicant Signa e/Date r I
The Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List (Cortese List) is used by the State, local
agencies and developers to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements
in providing information about the location of hazardous materials release sites.
P-1 (C) Page 1 of 2 Revised 02/13
Per the California Environmental Protection Agency's website, "While Government Code
Section 65962.5 [referred to as the Cortese List] makes reference to the preparation of a "list,"
many changes have occurred related to web-based information access since [the amended
statute's effective date in] 1992 and this information is now largely available on the Internet sites
of the responsible organizations. Those requesting a copy of the Cortese "list" are now referred
directly to the appropriate information resources contained on the Internet web sites of the
boards or departments that are referenced in the statute."
Below is a list of agencies that maintain information regarding hazardous waste and substances
sites.
Department of Toxic Substances Control
www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/CorteseList/default.htm
www.calepa.ca.gov/database/calsites
www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public
EnviroStor Help Desk (916) 323-3400
State Water Resources Control Board
http://geotracker. waterboards. ca.gov/
County of San Diego
Department of Environmental Health Services
www.co.san-diego.ca.us/deh
Hazardous Materials Division
www.sdcountv.ca.gov/deh/hazmat/hazmat permits.html
Mailing Address:
County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health
P.O. Box 129261
San Diego, CA 92112-9261
Call Duty Specialist for technical questions at (858) 505-6880, fax (858) 505-6868 (fax)
Environmental Protection Agency
National Priorities Sites ("Superfund" or "CERCUS")
www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/cursites
(800) 424-9346 or (702) 284-8214
National Priorities List Sites in the United States
www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/npl.htm
P-1(C) Page 2 of2 Revised 02/13
.... 0 .c .c
C) ·-G) c
.c ....
~
0
Ul
l ....
Ul
tCS
G)
C) c ·-~
0
0
...J
~Tf'\R"I \AI A TCI:')
'ell"' '"• ··-· _.,
STANDARDS
-~ ill""&"'"''"l-ii.lill.l A~--\,(UC~ IIVNI'fA ~C
E-34
iNSTRUCTiONS:
Land Oeveloprnent Engineering
1635 Faraday Avenue
760-602-2750
www.carlsbadca .gov I
To address post-development pollutants that may be generated from development projects, the City requires that new development and
significant redevelopment priority projects incorporate Permanent Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMP's) into the project
design per the City's Standard Urban Stormwater Management Pian (SUSMP). To view the SUSMP, refer to the Engineering Standards
(Volume 4, Chapter 2).
tnitiaUy this questionnaire must bs compteted by the applicant in advance of submltting for a devetopment application (subdivision1
discretionaflJ permits and/or construction permits)~ The results of the questionnaire determine tt,e teve! of storm '.Nater standards that
must be applied to a proposed development or redeveiopment project Depending on the outcome, your project will either be subject to
'Standard Stormwater Requirements' or be subject to additional criteria called 'Priority Development Project Requirements'. Many
aspects of project site design are dependent upon the storm water standards applied to a project
Your responses to the questionnaire represent an initial assessment of the proposed project conditions and impacts. City staff has
responsibiHty for making the final assessment after submission of the development application. If staff determines that the questionnaire
was incorrectly filled out and is subject to more stringent storm water standards than initially assessed by you, this wtll result in the return
of the development application as incomplete. In this case, please make the changes to the questionnaire and resubmit to the City.
If you are unsure about the meaning of a question or need help in determining how to respond to one or more of the questions, please
seek assistance from Land Developrnent Engineering staff.
A separote completed and signed questionnaire must be submitted for each nev1 development application submission. Oniy one
completed and signed questionnaire is required when multiple development applications for the same project are submitted concurrently.
In addition to this questionnaire, you must a!so complete, sign and submit a Project Threat Assessment Form with construction permits
for the project.
! Pfease start by completing Step 1 and follow the instructions. W11en completed, sign the form at the end and submit this with your J_
1 application to the city. 1
Stet" i l
·~~T~O~B=E~C~O~fi~~~P=LE=-~'E=O~F~O~R~A~~=Ll~P~R~O~~~·E~C~T~S~~~------------------------J,
1 To determine if your project is a priority development project, piease answer the foilowing questions: I ~ ~
1. !s your project LIMITED TO constructing new or retrofitting paved sidewalks, bicycle lanes or trails that meet ! the following criteria: ( 1) Designed and constructed to direct storm water runoff to adjacent vegetated areas, or
I
other non-erodible permeable areas; OR (2) designed and constructed to be hydraulicaHy disr..onnected from
paved streets or roads; OR (3) designed and constructed with permeable pavements or surfaces in
accordance with USEPA Green Streets uidance?
! 2. Is your project LIMITED TO retrofitting or redeveloping exiSting paved alleys, streets, or roads that are i designed and constructed in accordance with the USEPA Green Streets guidance?
X
I If you answered "yes" to one or more ot the above questions, then your project is NOT a priority development project and therefore is
f NOT subject to the storm water criteria required for priority developmeni projects. Go io step 4, mark the iasi bo.x siaiing "my
! project does not meet PDP requirements" and complete applicant infom1ation.
I ! if you answered ~no" to both guestions, then go to Step 2.
~,..ORM 'AI A TS::R -• v • ......-.a-'
STANDARDS
QUESTIOt..JNAIRE
E-.34
Land Development Engineering
i635 Faraday Avenue
760-602-2750
www.carlsbadca.gov
STEP2
TO BE COMPLETED FOR All NEW OR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
jro determine if your project is a priority development project, please answer the following questions:
I! 1. Is your project a nev; development that creates 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surfaces coiiective!y
l over the entire project s!te? Tl1is includes commercial, industrial, residential, mixed-use, and public
develooment roiects on oub/h,"J or JriVate land,
l 2. Is your project creating or replacing 5,000 square feet or rnore of impervious surface collectively over the entire
project site on an existing site of 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface? This includes commercial, I industrial, residential, mixed-use, and pubfic development proiects on public or private land.
jl 3. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates 5,000 square feet or more of imper.;ious surface
co!!ective!y over the entire project site and supports a restaurant? A restaurant is a facility that sells prepared l foods and drinks for consumption, including stationary lunch counters and refreshment stands selling prepared
YES NO
X
X
l___&ods and drinks for immt!Jdiate consumption,;.;,, ____ , ____________________ -+---l------l
II 4. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface
collectively over the entire project site and supports a hillside development project? A hillside development X project includes development on any natural slope that is twenty-five percent or greater.
I 5. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface v ,
I collectively over the entire project site and supports a parking lot A parking Jot is a land area or facility tor the A 1 l temporar;: parking or storage of motor vehicies used personaiiy for business or for commerce. __L_ ______ ----1
I 6. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface I j' j I coiiectiveiy over the entire project site and supports a street, road, highway freeway or driveway? A sireet, I X I
I
I road, highway, freeway or driveway is any paved impervious surface used for the transportation of j ! ~ j
. automobiles, try_cks, motorcycles, and other vehicles. I j 1
j7. Is your project a new or redeveloprnent project that creates or replaces 2,500 square feet or more o1 ! j 1
I
I impervious surface collectively over the entire site, and discharges directly to an Environmentally Sensitive 1 1 1\r~~ fC'C/'t..\") .urtis""n· "!1-;J"'J-,., n; .. ,.,. ..... ~f\1 ,.,...·: ;,..,,..iJ,dti"'J#!'o >ffl"'\t/11 +n· ~+ t"p ,..J'"\J"tv~~~~,.; oil~...i-""""d -'5 Aft::!t·~..,.,...t!:'!; ,...;: "'''0 ·~~·or i~eo-1!.' f X I 0\tVf;d \1..-Vr-\j: '-'J v iQ :::1"'!::1 '-"119"Y4.fJ "-V lHVfCA 9.,;;1-H~~v -c. ~~i. -.# vt.Jfl 9-!vu v.:;;tlit;t,~JI aut~ Go~tlv-o "'-"' .:.v flOO'Q~ t t\,;1..;;..;;-I f ~-f
1
1
from the project to the ESA, or conveyed in e pipe or open channel any distance as an isolated flow from the 1 i
nrniP.r.t to tf{,. FSA fi A ntlf r:nmmin lA.<:: with ftnw.<:: fmm ;:;rli;:;f:Ant l;:;nri.<;·i * I ' • i 8. ~~-y-~~r· p~~j~ct ~ ·n~~; d~,~~!;p~~~t ·th-at. ~-~pp-.;rt~ ·~~. ~~t~;;,~i~~~ ~~~p;l~ sr1op? An automotive repair s!'!op is a j I i
I ~";'f<'Y :::, '~d:i~·:, r5:;",;"Y,~~ of the followi''!J Standani !ndustda! C/a.ssff"'"'"" (SIC) codes.' 5013, I I X I
1
1
9_ ls your project a new development that supp<o>iis a retail gasoline outlet (RGO)? This category includes RGO'.s
1
. I I,
that m€Jet the foUov-.1ng criteria: (a) 5, 000 squar€1 feet or mora or (b} a project Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of X ! 100 or more vehicles per da '· l I I
10. Is your project a new or redevelopment project that results in the dist'...trbance of one or more acres of land and I II ! I are expected to generate pollutants post construction? ~ ! X I
r11:1s yourpro}ect-iocated-\~4lliin-2oo·reet-ofttie.Pacfficocean-an(r{1)-creates-2~5oo square-teet or--more ot T---T-v -·i ~ impervious surface or{2) increases impervious surface on the property by more than 10%? I I n !
f you answered "yes" to one or more of the above questions, you ARE a priority development project and are therefore subject to I
mp!ementing structural Best Management Practices (BMP's) in addition to implementing Standard Storm Water Requirements such ll
Jas source control and low impact development BMP's_ A Storm Water Management Plan {SWMP) must be submitted with your ,
lapp!ication{s) for development. Go to step 3 for redevelopment projects. For new projects, go to step 4 at the end of this 1
jquestionnaire, check the "my project meets POP requirements" box and complete applicant information. 1
lit you answered "no'' to aii of the above questions, you ARE NOT a priority deveiopment project and are therefore subject tol
jimp!ementing only Standard Storm Water Requirements such as source control and iow impact development BMP's required for ali11
!development projects. A Storm Water Management Plan {SWMP) is not required with your application{s) for development. Go to step
.A ...,.., """'.l"'lli _ _...,a -E-+hl&e!" MU""St'-"'"..,.1"•""""' ~"oJ..ft,._ir +h~ "mv p•oj·~At .f'tiAft~ I"''IQ+ 1'-A~fo. 0i'l£i-.,.A#OIIIiPA"""~"'.-j.~H hov "'nd CQftltlfti~t"' "P""'ii ..... ~nt-l !""Y Q~ i.ii"'* ~&'iW Vt C.I.CI..-. "f ~ CV*1&-IQ t~l Vlt.-..,:vn. lblf.lW til; t ~V WVWG II 4. f;llllii!i""" -1 W'l liiili'"tWUllii'fll~!l:·~ U A 'iiU llilf"i~ '\i Q f"IIV<Atl C.
information.
E-34 Page2of3 Effective 8/27/13
I I
if
I
STORM WATER
STANDARDS
QUESTIONt..JAIRE
e .. 34
Land Development Engineering
i635 Faraday Avenue
760-602-2750
www.carlsbadca.gov
STEP3
TO BE COMPLETED FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS THAT ARE PR!ORlTY DEVELOPEMENT PROJECTS ONLY
I Does the redevelopment project result in the creation or replacement of impervious surface in an amount of less than
50% of the surface area of the reviousl' existing deve!o ment?
If you answered "yes," the structural BMP's required for Priority Development Projects apply only to the creation or replacement of
impervious surface and not the entire development. Go to step 4, check the "my project meets PDP requirements" box and ,I
complete applicant information. 1
I it you answered ''no," the structurai BMP's required tor Priority Development Projects apply to the entire development Go to step 4, l L check the "my project meets PDP requir_!ment~" box and compiete ~iicant i!!fo~:.::a:.::ti:..::o.:c:n"'-. ____ .....J
STEP4
CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX: AND COMPLETE APPUCANT lt~FORMATION
\a
1Nft
My project meets PRiORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (PDP) requirements and must compiy with additionai stormwater 11
criteria per i:he SUSiv'iP and i understand I must prepare a Storm Water Management Plan for submittal at time of application.
I understand flow control (hydromodiflcation) requirements may apply to rny project Refer to SUSMP for details.
~~
!
My project does not meet POP requirements and must only compiy with STANDARD STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS per l
the SUSMP. As pari of these requirements, i wiii incorporate low impact development strategies throughout my project j I Applicant Information and Signature Box
I Address: 3806 G i'" ld St C · 1 b d CA 1 . aLle. . Teet, ar. s a , .. _ Accessor's Parcel Number(s): 204_270_04_00
! AD!J:Iicant Name: l · ~R~G.Investments Series, LLC Series I019 IApp7ZQQap
Applicant Title: Kevin Dunn -Manager
Date: lll ,... 1 \o 1 I'S
This Box for City Use Only
!i ri+-., r'--ncul"-renctr i Yt:.S I NO 11 t.JH.Y vvt i Yf r v.
1 !
Ry· ,-. --Date:
Project lD:
* Environmentally Sensitive Areas include but are not limited to a!! C!ean Water Act Section 303(d) impaired water bodies; areas
designated as Areas of Special Biological Significance by the State Water Resources Control Board fYVater Quality Control Plan for the
San Diego Basin {1994} and amendments); water bodies designated with the RARE beneficial use by the State Water Resources
Control Board (Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (1994) and amendments); areas designated as preserves or their
quivalent under the Muiti Species Conservation Program within the Cities and County of San Diego; and any other equivalent
environmentaily sensitive areas which have been identified by the Copermittees.
E-34 Page 3of3 Effective 6/27113
I
I
I
I COASTAl DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT SUPPLEMENTAL
REQU!REfJJENTS
Planning Division (
1635 Faraday Avenue I P-7 {760) 602-4610
www.carfsbadca.gov
In addition to the Coastal Development Permit application requirements identified on forms P-2 and P-
6, supplemental information may be required to be filed for any development requiring a Coastal
Development Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad.
t COASTAL OVERlAY ZONES -Coastat Overtay Zones require addtttona~ information to be
submitted as foilows: (refer to the Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapters 21.202 -21.205 for futl
description).
A. Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone {Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.202)
1. Refer to the Carisbad Municipal Code Sectio.1 21.202.060 for specific requirements
B. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Carlsbad iv'lunicipai Code Chapter 21.203)
1. Slope analysis/mapping for 25% and greater slopes subject to Section 21.203.040 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
2. Topographic and vegetation mapping/analysis subject to Subsection 21.203.040(8)(1) of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code, if project is located along the first row of tots bordering
Buena Vista Lagoon including the lagoon mouth.
3. Drainage study subject to Subsection 21.203.040(6)(3) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code if
project is located west of existing Paseo de! Norte, west of lnterstate 5 or along El Camino
Real immediately upstream of existing storm drains.
4. Geoiogic report addressing landslides and seismic hazards subject to Subsection
21.203.040(C) and (0) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
C. Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.204)
1. Geotechnical report subject to 21.204.110 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code if project is
located adjacent to an existing seab!uff edge betvveen the sea and the flrst public road
parallel to the sea; also may be required by City Planner if deemed necessary consistent
with Section 21.204.110 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
2. Show ail structures and decks on adjacent north and south properties to perform
''stringHne" test subject to SubsecUon 21.204.050(B) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
3. Unless otherwise submitted, a project in this zone must also submit plans showing:
a. Boundaries and topography
b. Existing and proposed structures
c. Circulation
d. Drainage
e. Finished topography
f. Landscaping
D. Coastal Resource Overlay Zone Mello i lCP Segment (Carlsbad Municipai Code Chapter
21.205)
P-7
1. Erosion, sedimentation and drainage report subject to Section 21.205.060 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code if project is located in the Batiqurros Lagoon watershed.
Page 1 of 2 Revised 07/10
It REQUIRED COASTAL PERMIT FINDINGS -Approval of a regular or minor coastal development
permit is based on the ability to make three coastal related findings. These three findings are
presented below for your review and information.
P-7
1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Certified Local Coastal Program
and all applicable policies.
2. That the development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of
Chapter 3 of the Coastai Act.
3. That the development conforms with any applicable decision pertinent to this proposal and/or
site as set by the Coasta~ Commission on a previously related appea~ decision per Pubfte
Resources Code §30604(c}.
Page 2 of2 Revised 07/10
: Kevin Dunn <kdunn@rincongrp.com>
Subj~:ct;~r:tield~~·
July 27, 2015 12:10:19 PM PDT
~ stava@shacarchitactura.com, Tyler Lawson
<tlawson @plsaengineering.com>, john@gmplandarch.com
Gentlemen,
FYJ, the owner/appHcant for this project is:
RREG Investments Series, LLC Series 1019
3005 S El Camino Real
San Clemente. CA 92672 ' ' .
Kevin Dunn
Rincon Real Estate Group
Rincon Homes
1520 N Et Camino Real, Unit 5
San Clemente, CA 92672
p: 949.637.32541 f: 888.634.0420
CA HRE #01875605
This e-mail and attachments (if any) is intended only for the addressee(s) and is subject to copyright This email
contains information which may be confidential or privileged. lf you are not the intended recipient please advise the
sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents and defete the message and any attachments from
your system. Unless specificaUy stated, this email does not constitute format advice or commitment by the sender
or Rincon Real Estate Group, Inc.
NOTICE OF FINAL ACTION
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The following project is located within the City of Carlsbad Coastal Zone. A coastal permit application for the project has been
acted upon.
SENT TO COASTAL COMMISSION VIA CERTIFIED MAIL ON """Ja,n""'u"'-'ar.J.._y-'=2""'-'0,.._.2""0..:.16,___ ____ _
Application#: PUD 15-17/SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11 Decision Date: ,Ja""n""'u,_,a"-ry._6""''-'2"""0""1""6 ________ _
Case Name: Garfield Custom Beach Homes Agent (if different): !.!NL!./A_,__ _________ _
Applicant: '-'K.=.ev.!..!i_,_,n..!:D'-"u,_,_n"""n'----------------Address: !.!NL!.A_,__ _____________ _
Address: 3005 South El Camino Real, San Clemente, CA 92672 Phone: ~N~A~---------------
Phone: (949) 637-3254
Project Description: Demolish a single-family home and detached garage. Construct two detached condominium units.
Project Location: 3806 Garfield Street
ACTION:
D APPROVED
IZJ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
D DENIED
(Copy of final resolution/decision letter is sent to: Coastal Commission, any persons who specifically requested it, and the
applicant).
COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL STATUS:
IZJ NOT APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION. 0 APPEALABLE TO THE COASTAL COMMISSION pursuant to Coastal Act Section 30603. An aggrieved person may
appeal this decision to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days following Coastal Commission receipt
of this notice. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date the Coastal Commission's
appeal period will conclude. Appeals must be made in writing to the Coastal Commission's district office at the
following address: California Coastal Commission, 7575 Metropolitan Dr., Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-
4402, Telephone (619) 767-2370.
Attachment: -Location Map to CCC for non-appealable CDPs
-Staff Report to CCC for appealable CDPs
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1094.6, which has been
made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be
filed in the appropriate court not later than ninety (90) days following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten
(10} days after the decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount
sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such a record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to
not later than thirty (30} days following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his attorney of
record, if he has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of
Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008.
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-4600 I 760-602-8560 fax
PROOF Of PUBLICATION
{2010 & 2011 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Diego
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident
of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of
eighteen years and not a party to or interested in
the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk
of the printer of
The San Diego Union Tribune
Formerly known as the North County Times and
UT North County and which newspaper has been
adjudicated as a newspaper of general circulation
by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego,
State of California, for the City of Oceanside and
the City of Escondido, Court Decree numbers
171349 & 172171, for the County of San Diego,
that the notice of whfch the annexed is a printed
copy (set in type not smaller than nonpariel), has
been published in each regular and entire issue of
said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof
onthe following· dates; to"'wit
December 26th, 2015
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
''
Dated at Oceanside, California
On This 28th, of December, 2015
Jane Allshouse
The San Diego Union Tribune
Legal Advertising
This space. Jr the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
Proof of Publication of'
PLANNING COMMISSION PUBliC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you, because your interest may be. affected, that the Plan-
ning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00p.m. on Wednes-day, January 6, 2016, to consider the following:
1) PUD 13-ll!Al -LA COSTA VIllAS~ Request for approval of a Planned Develop-
ment Permit amendment to revise the architectural style of an 8-unit multi-family
residential condominium project to Contemporary with roof decks on a 0.39 acre in-
fill site generally located on the south side of Gibraltar Street, west of Jerez Court, and
in local Facilities Management Zone 6. The City Planner has determined that this
project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 "ln-Fil.l Development Projects" of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on the environment.
:::1, I ' ·~ ]."">
ts.cw.r.o~ J'<I!Otl-~
2) PUD 15,17/SDP i~16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11 -GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES Request for approval of a Plannep Development Permit, Site Development
Plan, Coastal Develop~ent Permit, and Minor Subdivision to allow for the demolition of a single-family.home and the construction of a two-unit, detached single-family
residential air-space c:ondominium development on a .15 ac:re lot located at 3806
Garfield Avenue in ~oc~l Faci.lities Managem~ntZo.ne 1 and in the Mello II segment
of the local Coa~~al. erogram.Tiiis project is notlocated within the appealable area
of the California Coastal Cqmmission, .1M City Planner has determined that this pro-
ject is exempt from the requireme:nts of the California .Environmental Quality Act
(CEQAtpursuant to Section ·15332 ~ln:Fill Diwelopment projects" ofthe State CEQA
Guidelines and will not have any ~dverse significant impact on the environment.
3) PUD 13-06CdJ-ROBERTsON RANCH PLANNING AREA 5-A request for a deter-
mination that the project is within the.scope of the previously certified Robertson
Ranch Master Plan Environm.entallmpact Report (EIR 03-03) and subsequent Miti-
gated Negative DecJaratiori and a request for approval of single-family home floor plans, architectural elevations, and plotting for the 36 single-family lots located south
ofTamarackAvenue, east of El Camino Real and north of Cannon Road in local Facil-ities Management Zone 14.
If you challenge these projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those is-
sues you or someone else raised ;>t the public hearing described in this notice or in
written correspondence delivered to the City' of Carlsbad at or p1ior to the public 1
hearing.
Copies of the environmental documents are available at the Planning Division at 1635 Faraday Avenue duringTegular business hours from 7:30am to 5:30 pm Mon-day through Thufsday and 8:01) am to 5:00 pm Friday.
Those persons wishing to speakon these proposals are cordially invited to attend the public hearing. Copies of .the staff reports will be available online at
http://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload,aspx?BiobiD=28995 on
or after the Friday prior to the hearing date. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Division at (760) 61)2-4600.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DIVISION Pub: 1212.6/15
I
I -,-
~
I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to you that the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad will hold a public
hearing at the Council Chambers, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 6:00 p.m. on
Wednesday, January 6, 2016,. to consider a request for the following:
CASE NAME: PUD 15-17 /SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11-GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
PUBLISH DATE: December 22, 2015
DESCRIPTION: Request for approval of a Planned Development Permit, Site Development Plan, Coastal
Development Permit, and Minor Subdivision to allow for the demolition of a single-family home and the
construction of a two-unit, detached single-family residential air-space condominium development on a
.15 acre lot located at 3806 Garfield Avenue in Local Facilities Management Zone 1 and in the Mello II
segment of the Local Coastal Program. This project is not located within the appealable area of the
California Coastal Commission. The City Planner has determined that this project is exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 "In-Fill
Development Projects" of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact on
the environment.
Those persons wishing to speak on this proposal are cordially invited to attend the public hearing and
provide the decision makers with any oral or written comments they may have regarding the project.
Copies of the staff report will be available online at
http://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BiobiD=28995 on or after the Friday prior
to the hearing date.
If you have any questions, or would like to be notified of the decision, please contact Austin Silva in the
Planning Division at (760) 602-4631, Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Friday 8:00 a.m.
to 5:00p.m. at 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008.
APPEALS
The time within which you may judicially challenge these projects, if approved, is established by State
law and/or city ordinance, and is very short. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in
written correspondence delivered to the City of Carlsbad at or prior to the public hearing.
o Appeals to the City Council: Where the decision is appealable to the City Council, appeals must
be filed in writing within ten (10) calendar days after a decision by the Planning Commission.
o Coastal Commission Appealable Project:
D This site is located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
C8J This site is not located within the Coastal Zone Appealable Area.
D Application deemed complete: September 1, 2015
Where the decision is appealable to the Coastal Commission, appeals must be filed with the Coastal
Commission within ten (10) working days after the Coastal Commission has received a Notice of Final
Action from the City of Carlsbad. Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission of the date that
their appeal period will conclude. The San Diego office of the Coastal Commission is located at 7575
Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, California 92108-4402.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
PLANNING DIVISION
&
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-4600 I 760-602-8560 fax
SITE MAP
• N
NOT TO SCALE
Garfielld Custom Beach Homes
PUD 15-17 I SOP 15-16 I COP 15-34 I MS 15-11
Easy PeeJ® Labels
t!lse Avery® Template 5160®
JOHN W & JANET NEWTON
PO BOX 99
S CHATHAM, MA 02659-0099
SPERO DEMIS
PO BOX 24785
DENVER, CO 80224-0785
RICHARDSON
11821 S WARPAINT DR
PHOENIX, AZ 85044-3461
THOMAS & LOIS GORMAN
5824 S COLLEGE AVE
TEMPE, AZ 85283-2802
JOHN A & DENA DAVIS
PO BOX 949
CAMP VERDE, AZ 86322-0949
PACIFIC GENERAL LLC DBA PAC C
PO BOX 3210
LAKE HAVASU C, AZ 86405-3210
BONNIE R ROLLS
1941 REDESDALE AVE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90039-3057
JANIE JONES
3630 SURFWOOD RD
MALIBU, CA 90265-5653
JAMES & DENISE RICHARDS
4337 MARINA CITY DR 41
MARINA DEL RE, CA 90292-5834
TERRY A & MARY ANDRUES
2379 HIGHLAND AVE
ALTADENA, CA 91001-2548
Etiquettes fadles a peler
. . . y® 5160®
A IBIIIIII
i'eed Paper.-
Bend along line to !1l
expose Pop-up Edge™ J
C P JUNIPER LLC
2461 WESTBORO DR
GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49506-1258
LAP
PO BOX 6835
BRECKENRIDGE, CO 80424-6835
PAUL A FURMAN
13015 E SHANGRI LA RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85259-4477
D & J COURY
9602 W BUCKEYE RD
TOLLESON, AZ 85353-9101
PACIFIC GENERAL LLC
PO BOX 3210
LAKE HAVASU Cr AZ 86405-3210
RABBE & ROCHELLE LINDSTROM
12880 WELCOME WAY
RENO, NV 89511-2601
BONNIE K SAKAMOTO
11101 W SUNSET BLVD
LOS ANGELES, CA 90049-3226
IN GELMAN
473 30TH ST
MANHATTAN BEA, CA 90266-2076
CARL & BILLIE ERB
13875 PHILADELPHIA ST
·WHITTIER, CA 90601-3803
VAGENAS
316 COLORAD.O ST
ARCADIA, CA 91007-2635
...
Sens de -L--------"-
Repliez a Ia hachure afin de
r~v~IAr lA rAhnrtl Pnn • .,nMC
II AVERY® 5160® II . j
' I
ALFREp H & SUSAN BADGER;
207 RAINBOW DR 10795
LIVINpSTON, TX 77399-2007
CARR
1523 E EUGIE AVE
PHOENIX, AZ 85022-4951
LENA 7i: RAGONA
12048 jN 138TH ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85259-3758
GUGLIELMO
1011 W PLACITA QUIETA
GREEN VALLEY, AZ 85622-8350
TRAYER
PO BOX 3210
LAKE HAVASU C, AZ 86405-3210
ENRIGHT
7 2 FREMONT PL
LOS ANGELES, CA 90005-3858
LETICIA METALLO
6400 CRESCENT PARK 128
PLAYA VISTA, CA 90094-2339
BERNARD A & MARGARET HOFFMAN
604 19TH ST
MANHATTAN BEA, CA 90266-2509
SAMUEL H & COLLEEN MYERS
11114 BERMUDA ST
CERRITOS, CA 90703-1639
LEEKA
4368 HAYMAN AVE
LA CANADA1 CA 91011-3226
www.avery.com
'I!.Rnn.r.::n.Auc~:~v
Easy Pe~J® Labels
Use Avery® Template 5160®
PEDRO R & TER~SA COTTO
56 W MIRA MONTE AVE
SIERRA MADRE, CA 91024-1227
CHRISTOPHER PIELLI
26913 SANTA YNEZ WAY
VALENCIA, CA 91355-4970
CHESTER E & EILEEN JAEGER
6 3 6 ALAMOSA DR
CLAREMONT, CA 91711-2005
JESSICA H KIKO
GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4035
KEVIN FORBESS
1732 ROGUE ISLE CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3622
ROBERT D COURY
5167 LOS ROBLES DR
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4327
KAREN SETTLEMYER
2604B EL CAMINO REAL 216
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1214
CHRISTINA M ALVAREZ
180 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8240
LOUIS D LASTAVICH
3654 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8208
BRETT A ESKANDANIAN
384 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8229
Etiquettes fadles a peler
• • . · ·v®!!ii16o®
I
lj J
A -Bend along line to
Feed Paper-expose Pop-up Edge™
WILLIAM F & CATHER:fNE WALSH
18234 RAYEN ST
NORTHRIDGE, CA 91325-2757
MEL IDEO
6845 WISH AVE
LAKE BALBOA, CA 91406-4441
ELVIN E & SUZANNE YOAKUM
1400 W FRANCIS ST
ONTARIO, CA 91762-6016
JEAN M MCNALLY
4012 LAYANG LAYANG CIR B
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4171
RONALD BALLARD
4211 BEACH BLUFF RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3607
MILAM
3286 JAMES DR
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1961
T HARRIS-YUT
3655 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8219
ROSE A mks
190 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD,1 CA 92008-8240
PAT P & M!CHELLE FOURMONT
2 57 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, 'CA 92008-8244
ANGELA GLORIOSO
364 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8229
Sensde Repliez a Ia hachure afin de
r~v~l~r e~ r~hnrri Pnn ... nMC
I I I J
!
~ AVERY® 5160® 1
I TERRY & MARIAN GAG~ON
24244 NOTTINGHAM CT
VALENCIA, CA 91355-!3504
KEVIN N & JUDY MON~
14870 AVENIDA ANITA
CHINO HILLS, CA 91709-6223
RONALD & MARIA CHAMBERS
5937 MONTE RD
BONSALL, CA 92003-4009
RONALD BALLARD
4211 BEACH BLUFF RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3607
MARTY R ROMBOTIS
4869 SEVILLA WAY
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3816
LUGANO SHORES INVESTMENTS LLC
3818 SKYLINE RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-2743
LILIAN E HERNANDEZ
3677 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8219
WAYNE R SINTEK
146 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8265
MARK C & LILA BROWN
267 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8244
DARRELL BRUNN
330 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8227
www.avery.com
'I.Rrlll.il:n.A'UCDV
Easy Pee~® Labels
Use Avery® Template 5160®
EDWARDS ! I 320 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD,: CA 92008-8227
POTZ
3770 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8220
ALLEN COUNSELLOR
318 JUNIP?R AVE 3
CARLSBAD, ;CA 92008-8249
ROBERT J WEINGART
318 JUNIPER AVE 13
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8250
PHILLIP SCHWARTZ
256 JUNIPER AVE B5
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8203
JOSEPH & CHRISTINE BAILEY
252 JUNIPER AVE A2
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8201
MICHAEL J & ADRIENNE TRKAY
302 HEMLOCK AVE B
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8251
ERIC B & PURDOM THOMAS
141 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8241
JOHN ZATHAS
3772 CARLSBAD BLVD 3778
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8211
GRIFFING
150 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4051
Etiquettes fadles a peler
.. . . y® 5161)®
II l A-FeedPaper-
I; Bend along line to 11
expose Pop-up Edge™ 1
Jill
BLACIC
260 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8225
CAROL F DENENBERG
330 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8245
KEVIN P & SHELAGH KNICKERBOCI
318 JUNIPER AVE 7
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8249
GARY I ADLER
258 JUNIPER AVE A7
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8204
JENNIFER MORLEY
254 JUNIPER AVE A4
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8202
BRADLEY K BENTON
290 HEMLOCK AVE B
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8255
MAKHACHEV KHANNA
130 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8230
JONATHAN W & KATHLEEN ~AMPBEl
175 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-82421
KEITH M JORDAN
3474 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3225'
SHUSHAN
144 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4051
Sensde Repliez a Ia hachure afin de
rs!>v.>lt>r I~> r<>hnrfl Pnn ... nMC
CHERYL BONDY
246 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8225
RYAN F.AMTLY
318 JUNIPER AVE 2
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8248
ALLEN D COUNSELLOR
318 JUNIPER AVE 10
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8249
ANTONIO C MALDI
258 JUNIPER AVE A8
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8204
HARRY R & BURT JOSEPH
252 JUNIPER AVE B1
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8201
TIM & KATHY HAUCK
302 HEMLOCK AVE A
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8251
BONNIE J BOLTON
155 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8241
JAMES & KIKI ZATHAS
3905 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4036
RICHARDS
3839 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4032
CARLSBAD BLVD CONDO RENTAL Ll
3820 CARLSBAD BLVD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4004
www.avery.com
'l.!:!l'lfl.t:A.A\IICDV
Easy Peel® Labels
Use Aver},® Template 5160®
SONIA & USHA AHUJA
3820 CARLSBAD BLVD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-400~
KEVIN AGNER
3881 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4034
DAVID A & A CORBIN
3870 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4008'
CRUM
167 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4052
EDMUND R & MARIAN MOLINAR
285 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8226
JAMES R VINER
320 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4055
CHRIS A BUTLER
251 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4054
DONALD J & CLAUDE RHEAD
351 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4056
PEDRO MUNOZ
3 50 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4063
WILLIAM L GIRDNER
370 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4055
Etiquettes fadles a peler
· • · y® 'i1fin®
.6. -Feed Paper~
Bend along line to !
expose Pop-up Edge™ J
ROBERT jJ CLARK
3820 CARLSBAD BLVD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4004
GOLDSTEIN
160 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4059
JANAMARI CARLSON
135 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4052
KEITH M JORDAN
3474 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3225
JEANNE F SANDELL
350 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4055
NOLTE
290 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4053
SAL A SILVA
291 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4054
LUPE C HERRERA
371 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4056
NOE & ADELA SANCHEZ
270 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4061
CHARLES & LAVONN BULES
360 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4055
...
Sensde -'---------"-
Repliez a Ia hachure afin de
r.O,vil>IBr IB rBbord Pon-unMC
I
.,
AVERY® 5160® l!
4
CERE CEDES
3875 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4034
DAVID A & ALGIE CORBIN
3870 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4008
MARY E ROSGEN
151 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4052
MICHAEL F MCCARTY
245 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8226
ODOM
330 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4055
BRIAN & JOYCE SEIDERMAN
270 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4053
DEREK & MARCI TARVIN
301 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4056
LE$TER & MARJORIE WILSON
391 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4056
RAGLAND
260; TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4061
CHANEY 2004
333 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8228
www.avery.com
1-Rnn.c.;n.AVI=RV
Easy P,eel® Labels
Use Avery® Template 5160®
JOHN R ETCHELLS
367 HEMLOCK AVE A
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8239
JUSTIN LANZL
365 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8236
JAMES & KIKI ZATHAS
3905 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4036
GLENN L GOLDMAN
2653 ROOSEVELT ST D
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1667
SERAFIN LLC
4525 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4208
DAVID & JOHANNA MILLER
3940 SYME DR
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3569
NIXON
3201 CORTE PACIFICA
CARLSBAD, CA 92009-6096
ROBERT & DONNA FLEMING
2645 BRIGHTON RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92010-2891
3710 GARFIELD
7087 HERON CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3975
LONDON FIELDS
PO BOX 131749
CARLSBAD, CA 92013-1749
Etiquettes fadles a peler "" " ..,(il).,..,.,,.(il) !I
A-FeedPaper-
KELLEY K MUNOZ *M*
3 6!7 HEMLOCK AVE B
C~RLSBAD, CA 92008-8239
SUE E FOST *M*
363 HEMLOCK AVE A
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8235
TANIA SOLIS
151 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4060
DANIEL & MARILYN COURTNEY-MOl
300 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR 108
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-2990
KEVIN WINTERS
3810 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3403
BRIAN & JOYCE SEIDERMAN
1415 FOREST AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1012
MICHAEL T PICKARD
2731 YORK RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92010-2101
EDWARD J & CAROL KANE
3166 SEABURY ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92010-7036
SCHULTE
7386 ESCALLONIA CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011-4692
SABINA B·WILBER
PO BOX 94
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-0094
...
Sensde Repliez a Ia hachure afin de II
-~mm~~--II~ --L~-.-& IRI-----ll.llr 81
@ AVERY® 51&0® l
MEGAN SMITH
365 HEMLOCK AVE B
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8237
JAMES T & SHERYL GOTO
3911 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4036
LAURA M MOEWE
247 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4062
TAMARACK NO 237
2653 ROOSEVELT ST D
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1667
ROBERTO VIGILUCCI
4520 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4207
CIMA
2909 CANDIL PL
CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7104
ABRAMS
3623 HAVERHILL ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92010-2175
RICHARD W WALDRXP
3548 SIMSBURY CT
CARLSBAD, CA 920•10-7035
JUNIPER BEACH PROPERTIES LLC
1641 AMANTE CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011-4041
GARY C & DEBRA CRUSE
PO BOX 1098
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-1098
I !:
Easy PeeJ® Labels
Use Avery® Template 51&0®
LEE CRANE
PO BOX 1458
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-1458
JENSEN
PO BOX 2582
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-2582
SUMMER DAYS LLC
3135 DUSTY TRL
, ENCINITAS, CA 92024-7212
SHUSTER
j 2090 RIO VISTA DR
FALLBROOK, CA 92028-9329
JOYCE GAMMON
3258 PEARL LN
OCEANSIDE, CA 92056-4114
JUDITH.L ADLER
17178 CIRCA DEL SUR
RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067
MCALLISTER
440 N GRANADOS AVE
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-1215
FEARN BOYS-150 TAMARACK AVEN(
1120 JOSHUA WAY
VISTA,,CA 92081-7835
VOELKER
3145 VIA DEL MONTE LIBANO
VISTA, CA 92084-6558
MELINDA CRUM
101 MARKET ST 222
' SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-6812
Etiquettes fadles a peler .
• i;;2:z le; oabarit AV'"Rv® !!i'lli>n®
A-feed Paper-
I' Bend along line to 1 1
expose Pop-up Edge"111 A.
. ROBERT H & MARG:tffiET BARELMANt
PO BOX 1698
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-1698
ARTHUR E ALLEN
PO BOX 4238
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-4238
KAFADER
3428 SUNSET DR
FALLBROOK, CA 92028-9579
HOPPE CASA DEL SOL LLC
6530 EL CAMINO DEL TEATRO
LA JOLLA, CA 92037-6336
EDWARD & JOAN GOLDEN
4189 KIMBERLY LN
OCEANSIDE, CA 92056-3409
RUTLEDGE
PO BOX 676368
RANCHO SANTA , CA 92067-6368
JOHNSON
1234 LA GRANADA DR
SAN MARCOS, CA 92078-4850
RAY E JOHNSON
615 CORONA CT
VISTA, CA 92081-6702
RONALD D & KATHE CARLOCK
2258 BUENA CREEK RD
VISTA, CA 92084-7318
SELBY PROPERTIES LLC SERIES l
4411 MORENA BLVD 230
SAN DIEGO, CA 92117-4345
KURT E & REBECCA HOY *M*
PO BOX 1911
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-1911
CHRISTOPHER PERSIDOK
318 SPRUCEWOOD DR
ENCINITAS, CA 92024-4131
JOHN D & CHERYL BERAN
2215 VIA MONSERATE
FALLBROOK, CA 92028-9122
CAROL MILNE
555 EATON ST I
OCEANSIDE, CA 92054-6572
MAJOR HARBOUR
3162 SAN HELENA DR
OCEANSIDE, CA 92056-3256
DELMAR
789 TURTLE POINT WAY
SAN MARCOS, CA 92069-8126
FREEBERG
911 IRON HORSE CT
SAN MARCOS, CA 92078-7914
WILMER & CAROLYN NAUMAN
2144 BELLA VISTA DR
VISTA, CA 92084-7906
SHERMAN & FORCE COMMUNITY PRCI
1528 MONTE MAR RD
VISTA, CA 92084-4147
JOHN ZATHAS
6384 LOURDES TER
SAN DIEGO, CA 92120-3011
!I
Easy ~ee,l® labels
I:JseAvery®Template 5160®
SOUTH TRACY LAND PARTNERS LLC
4350 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DR 500 1
SAN DIEGO, CA 92122-6240
FORNAL
7677 CALLE HACIENDA
HIGHLAND, CA 92346-5837
RICHARD H & NANCY OVERGAAG
! 213 E SOUTH AVE
REDLANDS, CA 92373-7151
CURTIS W & CHERYL MONTGOMERY
5976 OMEGA ST
RIVERSIDE, CA 92506-4744
THOMAS C & JENNIFER ROSE
33741 HOLTZ HILL RD
DANA POINT, CA 92629-1936
1 HOGAN
2171 VIA TECA
I SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673-5649
BOB S & MARY MASUKAWA
2423 CLARKE AVE
FULLERTON, CA 92831-.4317
NANCY C TRAX
1016 OXFORD DR
PLACENTIA, CA 92870~4329
SUSAN BLENDE
301 HEADLANDS CT
SAUSALITO, CA 94965-1064
LARRY D & SARANNE MORSE
760 W 20TH ST
MERCED, CA 95340-3601
Etiquettes f<iidle!!i a peler
Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160® ll
.. -feed Paper -
Bend along liiile to lj'
expo~e Pop-up EdgeTM A,
MELTZNER
41536 ARMANAC CT
PALM DESERT, CA 92260-0375
365 HEMLOCK B
25612 BARTON RD 348
LOMA LINDA, CA 92354-3110
MATTHEW TAYLOR *M*
1450 RAVERSWOOD LAND
RIVERSIDE, CA 92506
MARC D KOVENS
29888 SYCAMORE RIDGE RD
MURRIETA, CA 92563-4708
MACDONALD
9121 ATLANTA AVE 701
HUNTINGTON BE, CA 92646-6309
BARNES
12231 WOODLAWN AVE
SANTA ANA, CA 92705-3010
WEINBERG
3215 E ABBEY LN
ORANGE, CA 92867-2009
CONSTANCE MELIDEO
PO BOX 6635
VENTURA, CA 93006-6635
DANIEL J CROWE
162 VILLA AVE
LOS GATOS, CA 95030-7037
DONALD L & MARY TAYLOR
4030 KAIKIO EWA PL
PRINCEVILLE, HI 96722-5424
Sensde Repliez a Ia hachure afin de I, I
reveler le rebord Pon-unMC
STAVISKI
6634 ORANGEWOOD RD
HIGHLAND, CA 92346-5242
J & J REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LJ
2 E STATE ST
REDLANDS, CA 92373~4754
JERRY & TINA RICKETTS
16517 RANCHO ESCONDIDO DR
RIVERSIDE, CA 92506-5803
HOHMAN
2450 ORANGE AVE
COSTA MESA, CA 92627-1319
WRAY MILLER
17822 SAN LEANDRO LN
HUNTINGTON BE, CA 92647-6640
OCEAN BREEZE DEV LLC
1442 IRVINE BLVD 233
TUSTIN, CA 92780-3800
MARANTZ FAMILY
6250 E WEST VIEW DR
ORANGE, CA 92869-4313
ESPEY
470 36TH AVE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94121-1612
DAVID J JEFFREY
326 ALAMO AVE
SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060-3006
CONSTANCE M BURKE
140 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
www.avery.~om
1.Ri11fll.!r.:n.AU!!:~V
I I 09~B/09~9® liJ8i\'i;f :l9fll~ 9iQ!~BdWO::l WW L9 X WW 92: lBWJO! ep enenb!B
'' 8/09 ~9® fi.J8fl'rJ 4l!M 81Q!WdWO::J uB/9 G X"~ 9Z!S 18QP '
1 OCCUPANT
3790 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8220
OCCUPANT
1 3770 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAp, CA 92008-8220
OCCUPANT
3815 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4032
OCCUPAN;r'
3812 GARFIELD ST 3824
CARLSBAP, CA 92008-4031
OCCUPANT
245 HEMI.,OCK AVE
CARLSBAp, CA 92008-8226
!-----
I
OCCUPAN\I'
250 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4053
' OCCUPANT , I
1 260 HEMLOCK AVE
I
'I CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8225 ; I'
OCCUPANT
3781 GARFIELD ST
1 CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8221
i' I ::I
I j
'I :I OCCUPANT :I! '' 3825 GARFIELD ST I i:
! :! CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4032
i II I
! I
II
'I
I
I
; I
':
OCCUPANT
3812 GARFIELD ST 3824
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4031
OCCUPANT
265 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8226
*** 16 Printed ***
I j
OCCUPANT
246 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8225
: OCCUPANT
I 3805 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4032
I
! :
I, !
' : /
I
OCCUPANT
3832 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4031
OCCUPANT
3806 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4031
OCCUPANT
270 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4053
I
I
I
I
1
1
A notice has been mailed i, ~II property ownersloccupa .il~ ;;~~'·::_ ! '2:.( -t'ft;ft . I:
I' , I
I , I
! I
I' , I
II II
I:
I I
I!
; I
:I
Slgnature:~-.:.t-.~,
II
----/ i
I
1 label size 1" x 2 5/8" with
t:titiw::;,.ttp rlP fnrm~t 91:\ rnm v Fi7 tnrn rnmn'=itih!t:t ~\taro Auor11 ®1:\1 f::f\/R1 1=::1
13520 Scarsdale Way
San Diego, CA 92128
www.titleprois.com
CERTIFICATION
I SEAN WILSON/ TITLE PRO INFORMATION SYSTEMS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED
LIST CONTAINES THE NAMES, ADDRESSES AND PARCEL NUMBERS OF ALL PERSONS TO WHOM
ALL PROPERTY IS ASSESSED AS THEY APPEAR ON THE LATEST AVAILABLE ASSESSMENT ROLL OF
THE COUNTY WITHIN THE AREA DESCRIBED AND REQUESTED BY YOU THE CLIENT, THE REQUIRED RADIUS
MEASURED FROM THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPERTY REQUESTED AND DESCRIBED AS:
APN ...
204-270-04 100FT
PLAT DATE 06/30/2015
COUNY OF: SAN DIEGO, CA
CITY OF: CARLSBAD
SEAN WILSON
TITLE PRO INFORMATION SYSTEMS
07/23/2015
DATE
Phone: 760.295.3951 I Fax: 760.295.4038
II!+~
TITLE PRO IS~
13520 Scarsdale Way
San Diego, CA 92128
www.titleprois.com
CERTIFICATION
I SEAN WILSON/ TITLE PRO INFORMATION SYSTEMS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED
LIST CONTAINES THE NAMES, ADDRESSES AND PARCEL NUMBERS OF ALL PERSONS TO WHOM
ALL PROPERTY IS ASSESSED AS THEY APPEAR ON THE LATEST AVAILABLE ASSESSMENT ROLL OF
THE COUNTY WITHIN THE AREA DESCRIBED AND REQUESTED BY YOU THE CLIENT, THE REQUIRED RADIUS
MEASURED FROM THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPERTY REQUESTED AND DESCRIBED AS:
APN ...
204-270-04 600FT
PLAT DATE 06/30/2015
COUNY OF: SAN DIEGO, CA
CITY OF: CARLSBAD
SEAN WILSON
TITLE PRO INFORMATION SYSTEMS
07/23/2015
DATE
Phone: 760.295.3951 I Fax: 760.295.4038
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST AND LABELS SUBMITIED TO
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD ON THIS DATE REPRESENT THE LATEST AVAILABLE
INFORMATION FROM THE EQUALIZED ASSESSOR'S ROLES.
PLAT DATE: 06/30/2015
APPLICATION NAME AND NUMBER
APPLICANT OR APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE
BY: SEAN WILSON-TITLE PRO INFORMATION SYSTEMS
~< ~1ecx
DATE: 07/23/2015
RECEIVED~ 1/_
I EARLY PUBLIC NOTICE
PROJECT NAME: Garfield Custom Beach Homes
PROJECT NUMBER: PUD 15-17 /SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11
1 ... City of
Carlsbad
This early public notice is to let you know that a development application for a Planned Unit
Development/Site Development Plan/Coastal Development Permit/Minor Subdivision project within
your neighborhood has been submitted to the City of Carlsbad on August 3, 2015. The project
application is undergoing its initial review by the City.
LOCATION: 3806 Garfield Street (southeast corner of Garfield Street and Hemlock Avenue)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to demolish the existing single-family residence and construct two,
three-story single-family residences with condominium ownership. The residences will take access off of
Hemlock Avenue.
Please keep in mind that this is an early public notice and that the project design could change as a
result of further staff and public review. A future public hearing notice will be mailed to you when this
project is scheduled for public hearing before the Planning Commission.
CONTACT INFORMATION: If you have questions or comments regarding this proposed project please
contact Austin Silva, Associate Planner at austin.silva@carlsbadca.gov or (760) 602-4631, City of
Carlsbad Planning Division, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008.
& Economic
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-4600 I 760-602-8560 fax
I
1 SITE ELEVATION
3116"=1'-0"
• ~ < ~' ~~>< C<. ><Ko UEP
~~.~~5:~~
GARFIELD
CUSTOM BEACH
HOMES
3806 Garfield Street,
Carlsbad CA 92008
Dosqjption
JOBNO: GARF
DATE: 7/31/2015 PLANNING 1
TITLE SITE ELEVATIONS
A0.2
' ' ', ' --~~-~----~----~----~~----~
',H E M L 0 C K' AVE.
J f-
w
I. w
0:: I f-
(f)
0
_j
w
-
-·LL
a::
<t:
Q (!) --<§
1 ~-~:~ .. ~LAN ~(9l
8'-6" X 19'-0" PARKING SPACE
fl-- -PROPERTY LINE
't.-----
53
SETBACKUNE
-FENCE-SEE LANDSCAPE DWGS
SITE PLAN LEGEND
KEYNOTES FOR DRAWiNGS
CONCRETE WALK-SEE CNIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
CONCRETE PATIO
57 PROPOSED DEDICATION TO CITY OF CARLSBAD--
SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
59 PROPERTY LINE
510 EXISTING STRUCTURE OUTSIDE OF PROJECT PROPERTY LINE-NOT A PART
36" X 48" CONCRETE LEVEL LANDING
512 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
513 PRr\IATE RECREATION SPACE-SEE AREA PLANS FOR SQUARE FOOTAGE AND DIMENSIONS
WALL PER CIVIL DRAWINGS
FENCE AND GATE WHERE INDICATED-SEE
LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
520 DIAGONAL HATCH PATTERN INDICATES SECOND
LEVEL OVERHANG
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING SIDEWALK
523 SETBACK LINE
• SHACKE
l> > ~ ' " N <,-" 0" ~
~~,!~.£<?c~
GARFIELD
CUSTOM BEACH
HOMES
3806 Garfield Street,
Carlsbad CA 92008
JOBNO: GARF
DATE: 7131/2015 PLANNING 1
TITLE SITE PLAN
A0.1
Ul:J ~11/Ul:J ~!:i® tiJi:mv ;.tttllt:: ttl4!~t::uwu;,t ww Ll:J x ww !:iG ~t::wJu~ ttiJ ttHoiiU!~~
09 ~r · · , 1.9® fiJaA'tif 4l!M aiQ!lBdwoo .. S/9 z x "~ az1s 1aqe1
JOHN W & JANET NEWTON
PO BOX !99
S CHATH~M, MA 02659-0099
SPERO DEMIS
PO BOX 24785
DENVER, CO 80224-0785
RICHARDSON
11821 S WARPAINT DR
PHOENIX, AZ 85044-3461
THOMAS & LOIS GORMAN
5824 S COLLEGE AVE
TEMPE, AZ 85283-2802
JOHN A & DENA DAVIS
PO BOX 949
CAMP VERDE, AZ 86322-0949
PACIFIC GENERAL LLC DBA PAC C
PO BOX 3210
I;AKE HAVASU C, AZ 86405-3210
BONNIE R ROLLS
1941 REbESDALE AVE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90039-3057
JANIE JONES
3630 SURFWOOD RD
MALIBU, CA 90265-5653
JM1ES & DENISE RICHARDS
4,337 MARINA CITY DR 41
MARINA DEL RE, CA 90292-5834
TERRY A, & MARY ANDRUES
2379 HipHLAND AVE
ALTADENA, CA 91001-2548
I
t.4M4!D
C P JUNIPER LLC
2461 WESTBORO DR
GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49506-1258
L A P
PO BOX 6835
BRECKENRIDGE, CO 80424-6835
PAUL A FURMAN
13015 E SHANGRI LA RD
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85259-4477
D & J COURY
9602 W BUCKEYE RD
TOLLESON, AZ 85353-9101
PACIFIC GENERAL LLC
PO BOX 3210
LAKE HAVASU C, AZ 86405-3210
RABBE & ROCHELLE LINDSTROM
12880 WELCOME WAY
RENO, NV 89511-2601
BONNIE K SAKM10TO
11101 W SUNSET BLVD
LOS ANGELES, CA 90049-3226
INGELMAN
473 30TH ST
MANHATTAN BEA, CA 90266-2076
CARL & BILLIE ERB
13875 PHILADELPHIA ST
WHITTIER, CA 90601-3803
VAGENAS
316 COLORADO ST
ARCADIA, CA 91007-2635
ALFRED H & SUSAN BADGER
207 RAINBOW DR 10795
LIVINGSTON, TX 77399-2007
CARR
1523 E EUGIE AVE
PHOENIX, AZ 85022-4951
LENA A RAGONA
12048 N 138TH ST
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85259-3758
GUGLIELMO
1011 W PLACITA QUIETA
GREEN VALLEY, AZ 85622-8350
TRAYER
PO BOX 3210
LAKE HAVASU C, AZ 86405-3210
ENRIGHT
72 FREMONT PL
LOS ANGELES, CA 90005-3858
LETICIA METALLO
6400 CRESCENT PARK 128
PLAYA VISTA, CA 90094-2339
BERNARD A & MARGARET HOFFMAN
604 19TH ST
MANHATTAN BEA, CA 90266-2509
SAMUEL H & COLLEEN MYERS
11114 BERMUDA ST
CERRITOS, CA 90703-1639
LEEKA
4368 HAYMAN AVE
LA CANADA, CA 91011-3226
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160
U::l H;!/U::I ~~® """'11 "'""~ "ll.f!+~uwu"' ww Ll:J A ww ~G +~WJU! tljJ tiHtiiiUH:;f
I
I
PEDRO R. & TERESA COTTO
56 W MIRA MONTE AVE
SIERRA MADRE, CA 91024-1227
CHRISTOPHER PIELLI
26913 SANTA YNEZ WAY
VALENCIA, CA 91355-4970
CHESTER E & EILEEN JAEGER
636 ALAMOSA DR
CLAREMONT, CA 91711-2005
JESSICA H KIKO
GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4035
KEVIN FORBESS
1732 ROGUE ISLE CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3622
ROBERT D COURY
5167 LOS ROBLES DR
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4327
KAREN S.ETTLEMYER
2604B EL CAMINO REAL 216
CARLSBAp, CA 92008-1214
CHRISTINA M ALVAREZ
180 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8240
LOUIS D LASTAVICH
3654 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8208
BRETT A: ESKANDANIAN
384 HEMil:.,OCK AVE
CARLSBAp, CA 92008-8229
09' r 1 ~9® fJaA'f;j 4l!M 91Q!ledwo:J .. S/9 G X"~ 9Z!S 19Qel
WILLIAM F & CATHERINE WALSH
18234 RAYEN ST
NORTHRIDGE, CA 91325-2757
MEL IDEO
6845 WISH AVE
LAKE BALBOA, CA 91406-4441
ELVIN E & SUZANNE YOAKUM
1400 W FRANCIS ST
ONTARIO, CA 91762-6016
JEAN M MCNALLY
4012 LAYANG LAYANG CIR B
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4171
RONALD BALLARD
4211 BEACH BLUFF RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3607
MILAM
3286 JAMES DR
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1961
T HARRIS-YUT
3655 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8219
ROSE A DIES
190 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8240
PAT P & MICHELLE FOURMONT
257 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8244
ANGELA GLORIOSO
364 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8229
TERRY & MARIAN GAGNON
24244 NOTTINGHAM CT
VALENCIA, CA 91355-3504
KEVIN N & JUDY MONAHAN
14870 AVENIDA ANITA
CHINO HILLS, CA 91709-6223
RONALD & MARIA CHAMBERS
5937 MONTE RD
BONSALL, CA 92003-4009
RONALD BALLARD
4211 BEACH BLUFF RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3607
MARTY R ROMBOTIS
4869 SEVILLA WAY
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3816
LUGANO SHORES INVESTMENTS LLC
3818 SKYLINE RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-2743
LILIAN E HERNANDEZ
3677 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8219
WAYNE R SINTEK
146 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8265
MARK C & LILA BROWN
267 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8244
DARRELL BRUNN
·330 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8227
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
Etiouette de format 25 mm x 67 mm comoatible avec Averv ®5160/8160
U::Hli/U~H~® """"11 "'om:; "I"'HIJUWU"' ww L':J A WW !:!G ~t:WJUf ti(J tiHI:IIIU!t;l
EDWARDS
320 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8227
P:OTZ
3.7 7 0 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8220
I
ALLEN COUNSELLOR
318 JUNfiPER AVE 3
CARLSBAb, CA 92008-8249
ROBERT J WEINGART
318 JUNIPER AVE 13
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8250
PHILLIP SCHWARTZ
256 JUNIPER AVE B5
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8203
I
JOSEPH b CHRISTINE BAILEY
252 JUN~PER AVE A2
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8201
MICHAEL J & ADRIENNE TRKAY
302 HEMLOCK AVE B
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8251
ERIC B & PURDOM THOMAS
1.41 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8241
I I
JOHN ZATHAS
3772 CARLSBAD BLVD 3778
CARLSBAp, CA 92008-8211
GRIFFING
150 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4051
019V 't9® f.JSA'r;/ 4l!M 81Q!lBdWO:J .. B/9 G X ,,L 8Z!S 18QBI
BLACIC
260 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8225
CAROL F DENENBERG
330 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8245
KEVIN P & SHELAGH KNICKERBOCI
318 JUNIPER AVE 7
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8249
GARY I ADLER
258 JUNIPER AVE A7
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8204
JENNIFER MORLEY
254 JUNIPER AVE A4
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8202
BRADLEY K BENTON
290 HEMLOCK AVE B
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8255
MAKHACHEV KHANNA
130 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8230
JONATHAN W & KATHLEEN CAMPBEJ
175 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8242
KEITH M JORDAN
3474 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3225
SHUSHAN
144 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4051
CHERYL BONDY
246 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8225
RYAN FAMILY
318 JUNIPER AVE 2
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8248
ALLEN D COUNSELLOR
318 JUNIPER AVE 10
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8249
ANTONIO C MALDI
258 JUNIPER AVE A8
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8204
HARRY R & BURT JOSEPH
252 JUNIPER AVE B1
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8201
TIM & KATHY HAUCK
302 HEMLOCK AVE A
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8251
BONNIE J BOLTON
155 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8241
JAMES & KIKI ZATHAS
3905 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4036
RICHARDS
3839 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4032
CARLSBAD BLVD CONDO RENTAL Ll
3820 CARLSBAD BLVD B
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4004
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
Etiauette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Averv ®5160/8160
SONIA & OSHA AHUJA
3820 CARLSBAD BLVD C
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4004
KEVIN AGNER
3881 GA~FIELD ST
CARLSBAb, CA 92008-4034
I
DAVID A & A CORBIN
3870 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4008
CRUM
167 REDWOOD AVE
QARLSBAD, CA 92008-4052
EDMUND R & MARIAN MOLINAR
285 HEM!LOCK AVE
CARLSBAP, CA 92008-8226
JAMES R' VINER
320 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4055
CHRIS A BUTLER
251 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4054
DONALD J & CLAUDE RHEAD
351 REDfvOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4056
PEDRO MtJNOZ
350 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4063
I
WILLIAM L GIRDNER
370 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4055
u::Hl!tu::~ ~~® 'u""l7 "'""" "14H~;;uwu" ww L'd " ww !:iG ~t:wJu! oi.J oUoiiU!kl
09 ~..-'~g® fuall'rJ Ln!M aiQ!ledwoo .. 9/9 c: x .. ~ az1s 1aqe1
ROBERT J CLARK
3820 CARLSBAD BLVD D
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4004
GOLDSTEIN
160 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4059
JANAMARI CARLSON
135 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4052
KEITH M JORDAN
3474 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3225
JEANNE F SANDELL
350 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4055
NOLTE
290 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4053
SAL A SILVA
I 291 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4054
LUPE C HERRERA
371 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4056
NOE & ADELA SANCHEZ
270 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4061
CHARLES & LAVONN BOLES
360 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4055
CERECEDES
3875 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4034
DAVID A & ALGIE CORBIN
3870 CARLSBAD BLVD
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4008
MARY E ROSGEN
151 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4052
MICHAEL F MCCARTY
245 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8226
ODOM
330 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4055
' BRIAN & JOYCE SEIDERMAN
270 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4053
DEREK & MARCI TARVIN
301 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4056
LESTER & MARJORIE WILSON
391 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4056
RAGLAND
260 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4061
CHANEY 2004
333 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8228
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Averv ®5160/8160
JOHN R ETCHELLS
367 HEMLOCK AVE A
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8239
JUSTIN LANZL
365 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAb, CA 92008-8236
JAMES & KIKI ZATHAS
3905 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4036
GLENN L GOLDMAN
2653 ROOSEVELT ST D
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1667
I
I
SERAFIN1 LLC
4525 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4208
DAVID & JOHANNA MILLER
3940 SYME DR
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3569
NIXON
3201 CORTE PACIFICA
CARLSBAp, CA 92009-6096
I
ROBERT & DONNA FLEMING
I 2645 BR1GHTON RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92010-2891
3710 GARFIELD
7087 HERON CIR
CARLSBAD, CA 92011-3975
LONDON FIELDS
PO BOX 131749
CARLSBAD, CA 92013-1749 I
i
tiM¥!1
u~ Hi/U::JJ.~® II.H:mv \J'O'l\t. tl'l'"t!+t.UWUU ww L'::J J\ ww ~(, .f.t.ilUAVf CfJ t7Ht111U!.J.j
09 ~ r ... -, ~g® !iJ9fl'rj 4l!M 91Q!lBdWO:J .. 9/g G X "~ 9Z!S 19QBI . fiiGWtl
KELLEY K MUNOZ *M*
367 HEMLOCK AVE B
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8239
SUE E FOST *M*
363 HEMLOCK AVE A
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8235
TANIA SOLIS
151 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4060
DANIEL & MARILYN COURTNEY-MOE
300 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR 108
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-2990
KEVIN WINTERS
3810 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-3403
BRIAN & JOYCE SEIDERMAN
1415 FOREST AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1012
MICHAEL T PICKARD
2731 YORK RD
CARLSBAD, CA 92010-2101
EDWARD J & CAROL KANE
3166 SEABURY ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92010-7036
SCHULTE
7386 ESCALLONIA CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011-4692
SABINA B WILBER
PO BOX 94
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-0094
MEGAN SMITH
365 HEMLOCK AVE B
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8237
JAMES T & SHERYL GOTO
3911 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4036
LAURA M MOEWE
247 TAMARACK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4062
TAMARACK NO 237
2653 ROOSEVELT ST D
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1667
ROBERTO VIGILUCCI
4520 ADAMS ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4207
CIMA
2909 CANDIL PL
CARLSBAD, CA 92009-7104
ABRAMS
3623 HAVERHILL ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92010-2175
RICHARD W WALDRIP
3548 SIMSBURY CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92010-7035
JUNIPER BEACH PROPERTIES LLC
1641 AMANTE CT
CARLSBAD, CA 92011-4041
GARY C & DEBRA CRUSE
PO BOX 1098
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-1098
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160
U::l ~t!/U::I ~~® IIJ0/\17 """" "1'-I!+"UWV ... ww L'd" ww ~G +"WJVf l:tfl I:IHtiiiU!+:;I titGW'i'
d i
LEE cRAi-m
PO BOX ~458
CARLSBAP, CA 92018-1458
I
JENSEN
PO BOX 2582
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-2582
s'UMMER DAYS LLC
3135 DUSTY TRL
ENCINITAS, CA 92024-7212
SHUSTER!
2090 Rib VISTA DR
FALLBROpK, CA 92028-9329
JOYCE GAMMON
3258 PEARL LN
OCEANSIDE, CA 92056-4114
JUDITH L ADLER
i7178 CIRCA DEL SUR
RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067
MCALLISTER
440 N GRANADOS AVE
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-1215
FEARN BOYS-150 TAMARACK AVENl
1120 JOSHUA WAY
VISTA, CA 92081-7835
VOELKER
3145 VIA DEL MONTE LIBANO
VISTA, CA 92084-6558
MELINDA! CRUM
101 MARKET ST 222
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-6812
09 ~ r . ~ Lg® !iJaA'f! 4~!M 31Q!~l!dWO:J .. s;g G X "~ 3Z!S 13Ql!J
ROBERT H & MARGARET BARELMANt
PO BOX 1698
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-1698
ARTHUR E ALLEN
PO BOX 4238
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-4238
KAFADER
3428 SUNSET DR
FALLBROOK, CA 92028-9579
HOPPE CASA DEL SOL LLC
6530 EL CAMINO DEL TEATRO
LA JOLLA, CA 92037-6336
EDWARD & JOAN GOLDEN
4189 KIMBERLY LN
OCEANSIDE, CA 92056-3409
RUTLEDGE
PO BOX 676368
RANCHO SANTA , CA 92067-6368
JOHNSON
1234 LA GRANADA DR
SAN MARCOS, CA 92078-4850
RAY E JOHNSON
615 CORONA CT
VISTA, CA 92081-6702
RONALD D & KATHE CARLOCK
2258 BUENA CREEK RD
VISTA, CA 92084-7318
SELBY PROPERTIES LLC SERIES
4411 MORENA BLVD 230
SAN DIEGO, CA 92117-4345
KURT E & REBECCA HOY *M*
PO BOX 1911
CARLSBAD, CA 92018-1911
CHRISTOPHER PERSIDOK
318 SPRUCEWOOD DR
ENCINITAS, CA 92024-4131
JOHN D & CHERYL BERAN
2215 VIA MONSERATE
FALLBROOK, CA 92028-9122
CAROL MILNE
555 EATON ST I
OCEANSIDE, CA 92054-6572
MAJOR HARBOUR
3162 SAN HELENA DR
OCEANSIDE, CA 92056-3256
DELMAR
789 TURTLE POINT WAY
SAN MARCOS, CA 92069-8126
FREEBERG
911 IRON HORSE CT
SAN MARCOS, CA 92078-7914
WILMER & CAROLYN NAUMAN
2144 BELLA VISTA DR
VISTA, CA 92084-7906
SHERMAN & FORCE COMMUNITY PRC
1528 MONTE MAR RD
VISTA, CA 92084-4147
JOHN ZATHAS
6384 LOURDES TER
SAN DIEGO, CA 92120-3011
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160
u::HilJU::H::J® ''-''"'IT """" "IY!+"uwv" ww L':J A ww ~G +t:wJu~ "'ll ttHttiiU!+j
019 ~r ·--, ~9® !iJ9A'tJ 4l!M 91Q!redWO:l .. B/9 Z X"~ 9Z!S 19QBI ,
' ' I SOUTH TRACY LAND PARTNERS LLC
4350 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DR 500
SAN DIEGO, CA 92122-6240
FORNAL
7677 CALLE HACIENDA
HIGHLAND, CA 92346-5837
RICHARD! H & NANCY OVERGAAG
213 E SPUTH AVE
REDLANDS, CA 92373-7151
CURTIS W & CHERYL MONTGOMERY
5976 OMEGA ST
RIVERSIDE, CA 92506-4744
THOMAS C & JENNIFER ROSE
33741 HOLTZ HILL RD
DANA POINT, CA 92629-1936
HOGAN ,
2171 VI~ TECA
SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92673-5649
BOB S & MARY MASUKAWA
2423 CLARKE AVE
FULLERTON, CA 92831-4317
N'ANCY C TRAX
1;016 OXFORD DR
PLACENTIA, CA 92870-4329
SUSAN B~ENDE
301 HEAPLANDS CT
SAUSALI~O, CA 94965-1064
LARRY D & SARANNE MORSE
760 W 20TH ST
MERCED, CA 95340-3601
MELTZNER
41536 ARMANAC CT
PALM DESERT, CA 92260-0375
365 HEMLOCK B
25612 BARTON RD 348
LOMA LINDA, CA 92354-3110
MATTHEW TAYLOR *M*
1450 RAVERSWOOD LAND
RIVERSIDE, CA 92506
MARC D KOVENS
29888 SYCAMORE RIDGE RD
MURRIETA, CA 92563-4708
MACDONALD
9121 ATLANTA AVE 701
HUNTINGTON BE, CA 92646-6309
BARNES
12231 WOODLAWN AVE
SANTA ANA, CA 92705-3010
·WEINBERG
3215 E ABBEY LN
ORANGE, CA 92867-2009
CONSTANCE MELIDEO
PO BOX 6635
VENTURA, CA 93006-6635
DANIEL J CROWE
162 VILLA AVE
LOS GATOS, CA 95030-7037
DONALD L & MARY TAYLOR
4030 KAIKIO EWA PL
PRINCEVILLE, HI 96722-5424
STAVISKI
6634 ORANGEWOOD RD
HIGHLAND, CA 92346-5242
J & J REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LJ
2 E STATE ST
REDLANDS, CA 92373-4754
JERRY & TINA RICKETTS
16517 RANCHO ESCONDIDO DR
RIVERSIDE, CA 92506-5803
HOHMAN
2450 ORANGE AVE
COSTA MESA, CA 92627-1319
WRAY MILLER
17822 SAN LEANDRO LN
HUNTINGTON BE, CA 92647-6640
OCEAN BREEZE DEV LLC
1442 IRVINE BLVD 233
TUSTIN, CA 92780-3800
MARANTZ FAMILY
6250 E WEST VIEW DR
ORANGE, CA 92869-4313
ESPEY
470 36TH AVE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94121-1612
DAVID J JEFFREY
326 ALAMO AVE
SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060-3006
CONSTANCE M BURKE
140 JUNIPER AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160
OCCUPANT
3790 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8220
OCCUPANT
3770 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAp, CA 92008-8220
I
OCCUPAN[['
3815 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4032
OCCUPANT
3812 GARFIELD ST 3824
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4031
OCCUPANT
245 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAp, CA 92008·-8226
OCCUPANT
250 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4053
Uo:J~O/V\Jlf-:J'(W '""'"'nV "'"''""' "'1'1!tU"'"""'vv LU\M L::J n u.u .. u !:HJ +Ltu.A.tu~ OfJ 'C+fOilU!f,j
09 ~f' ,_, ~9® f..J9fl'tj lJl!M 9fq!llldWO:> .. B/9 G X"~ 9Z!S f9qllf ,
OCCUPANT
260 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8225
OCCUPANT
3781 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8221
fC
OCCUPANT
3825 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4032
OCCUPANT
3812 GARFIELD ST 3824
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4031
OCCUPANT
265 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8226
*** 16 Printed ***
OCCUPANT
246 HEMLOCK AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-8225
OCCUPANT
3805 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4032
OCCUPANT
3832 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4031
OCCUPANT
3806 GARFIELD ST
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4031
OCCUPANT
270 REDWOOD AVE
CARLSBAD, CA 92008-4053
A notice has been mailed to
all property owners/occupants
listed herein. q '1
Date: ___ --:::u...f--:"";....L.+-'::::..----,r~
label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery ®5160/8160
Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160
09
~ ~ ~ L
I
~
f\J
'@
-$-I
®
~ (,0
.1'-~ ..)-41 '40· 98
a;. .
o~l
1-!\vt'' 1!.~?1N"4.
(/) I .f'-8fl
;<.S.~
w > <{
<( -u
<{ u
<{
0 '!: N N
~ lllJ-= . .,
~
Q II\ IIlio z ~
~
f:
0
!! I I 2
6>0 58.77 so
3oe.11
0
6 0.86AC
@
7 0.87 AC
0
8 0.87 AC
BLK Q
0
' !\ 9
'-i
0 .$., u 0 @@
·.· .:. ·.·· .....
10
0 ...; • ~~7R-+-.r.r so 47..:1» •r .r"
() ~
@
087AC
@
0.87 AC
@sHT.I
s 34-. 33'£
10 •. 77
5
4
"'~~'3~·~
I)
~
r..;
~
PM 7248 1 &<a. ao (\1 \-:2'2. ~"!:oo 0
CONDO · ct PM 1443 ~ ~ PARK JUNJ PER i f5'3\ PAR I .;
· DOC78-300780 ~ ~ -' ~ (SEE SHT 2) Q \~2-.coo -~ L01' I ('I• 0.70AC ·.
~o~.~o· PM 7248 ~
J! .()1~
@
0.87 AC 2
@)
('I
~
M1803 ..... M7961
~
~~
30e.7~
CONDO I CASA DE LA PLAYA' Q DOC-74-1589~2
\.::::::) (SEE SHT 2)
0.86AC
l :1<:!_~,;
so
-,
~
I M7961
~
Ml747
IIBLK. 0 @ @
0
8
@ @ @ @
3 4
IJiO 47.SO
5
I •.JD 6-r -ts
6 I 7
so
534°~3'&
~ ~
9 10 I I 12 -$1.71 ' : GARFIELD
r-- -I
SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S~AP BK 20~PG 2~ SHTIOF3'
. ~CHERRY l AVE
@
"
1.0
w > <(
a: w
0.. -z :::> .....,
4>0
#.~~.i'"s-#-7V
., ..,
I"
liS
@ ~~ -9 ~· ... !':
//a ~ IDO PMI2335 , ~PAR I <:>~ v ~~ "'-:'4 '* ~ II~ ~
~ ~ @) ~4
~
LOT 4 115
FtoT3 .
I @)
'2.'!.0
@)
"' ~
BLK
I 'loS lOS
@ ,~@ ., . .... ....
2 N 34°33~7-IV
lOS
~ ..,:
lll_ao
I"-('l
0
@ ~~ m @3* loi ~ .. !"" PARI
Ill IIIIo s z ~ Ill ,a
LOT2 1~'5
liS
~ "
~
....
~ ~
~
~
I
!II) r-UJ ~ • Ul Ill
'2
w
~
LOT I
"' " (§} ~
I
-~CONDO
PM 1233S
DOC82-357174
(SEE SHT 3)
2* CONDO C SEE SHT 3)
CHRISTLE COVE
DOC84-J563.21
3*CONDO
HEMLOCK CARLSBAD
HOMEOWNERS A~SN.
DOC92.-312.046
(SEE SHT 3)
-$-
~ .
7
s
204-24 ~ 6
SHT 1 OF 3 '!'.?'*-
"
6/18/2001 SM J
s
VOID
~~-
II! @I~ g
~ @
II~ --@ @
BLK
~ I 2
4,(;,
~
$@
I ~
@ @
N
3 4
534• 33'e
ST
"'
. "' t.1J803
f.-11747 le,
15 ~
Ill 4'"-
g
'---~
~ w
I
tbO
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABiliTY IS
ASSLMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA St-OWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS
MAY t-OT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISON OR BUILQII'li ORDINANCES.
I .
MAP 7961 -CARLSBAD TCT NO 73-30
MAP 1803-PALISADES NO 2-BLKS Q&R
MAP 1747-PALISADES-BLKS N &0
ROS 3234
09
I
6iJ
60
w > <(
a: w a.. -z
:J
J
bO
1-' <0 N "' :;'
"' "' z
~
I ~
~ GARFIELD '
9Z.OZ 46 ~, M10467
""'
0. () Q 0.
~ I ~ 12 ~ II 10~
@ ® ® 0 ~
46 46
CONDO 3.01 9 115 DOC 82-270112
(SEE SHT 2) ~® Q
J::t.!0467 /1&.03
It\
16 <§)@ ~ @ 115
17 BLK E 7
@ ®
18 6
~ ® 0115
() ..,
115
N 138.08 91.99
IX) PM20431 I') (l) " .... 0 PAR 1 ~~ ,...;
:::!: PAR 1 ~ @ a.. @ ~
0 &l~ -· "" I') ,..: Ol .... NJ;>.~~ ~ 1.38.20 :::!: 1.2<{d a.. 83.05 • ) 10 N.31°51'09 w ?'" n ""-1 N31'49'56'W
~CARLSBAD
/1
({;)
io ,. •• .,..)
f8 l".~/,· -18
''1:rJ-.
> 4:
~ u
0
_j
~
l.Ll
I
50
ST OP
t--'~""''"'"''
~ 15 !4 !3 12 I I <:> .... ' CD ® 0 0 0
.,8 48
120 16 10 120
~ @ 0 ~
17 <§)0 ®
18 8
@) BLK F 0
19 7
® 0
20 6
~ ® ® .... ..,.
120 120
48 4 11 5 { I PAR A 3
=:@-o ®~ ®~ ®~ J..; ~ ~I ;;:: ~ ~ I() I• t.: .,; ~ 0) ::: ::::: I() .... .....
<')
~rL-48.04.. :::!: .-tl 97.Zti a. 48.04 10 S 32 "..?t• ~c 11.: • ·1~
141
XI-SD-28
50
w
~
0
0
0
3:
0 w a:
so
~ ... . r'
HWY OP
ST 0 ~ 'Os~
/"(:J*fV~.!J • w t
46 1 46 "f6.12 -f6 ~47.6E>:;,:t"'! -
PAR I ·A"''l ,.C.,f)·
.... ,., .. ®-
Q 01 ~ "' ~ ~ 15 ~ 14 § (1)2•o 12~ ll I' !:!
,S? 2 0 0 :::!:
46 ~6.28 46 47.&6
/IS 16 10 lf6.66
~ ® 0 ..,
v
17 <§)@ ®
18 BLK G 8
® 0
19 7
® 0
20 6
"' ® ® /16.(,6
11) .... ....
1/.S
~ 4t it -12 13'}.66 PM3713
0. PAR.I @ @ .... @ "' "' .,; :'i 0 ....
~
.
"' \0
t
~ ~
..D ::: PM3713 ,v
114.76 '!>~'
K= 7935 R~ 'j.
WY OP -~-NO ACCESS
----BLVD
~
• ' • ~ '
ST OP
10.7'
60
w > <{
€.0
~ u
<{
0::
<(
~
<( r-
so ~
SAN DIEGO COUN1Y ASSESSOR'S MAP
~ 204-25
SHT 1 OF 2
1''=100'
06/17/2001 ie9
~:6·(;·95 Br-__RJ0Frr~nt:Z04·25
C"HA~. ES
!JLI( PRJ'JR V'N YfW~ ~ lanvo
ZSI 20 CONDO 1&4 615
25J 4 SAME • I 9Z 147SZ ST WID
251 o1-o3 1 21 04 1990
1251 4&5 ·-22 09 1108
I• CONDO
CARLSBAD OCEANSIDE HOMES
DOC 75-55089
(SEE SHT 2)
~ --------------------------
2 •CONDO
GARFIELD ST
DOC 81-256469
(SEE SHT 2)
c..:>
SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP
BOOK 204 PAGE as SHT 1 OF 2
@
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS
ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS
MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISION OR BUILDING ORDINANCES.
MAP 10467 -,CARLSBAD TCT NO 80-21
MAP 1747-PALISADES -BLKS E F &. G
ROS 13290,16508
cc
;1:
09
" N
'4-
~
~
'"'t/3 u:i ""'......ow ,_wu ,_u:z ;;;;;~~ a:> c.._ ~!fl~ a:O ~§h~
·W->-VJQ ~~d
.0 ffi r.n . W:za: r.n:;~:o ~~:z ::>VJQ "-<r.n t-!;;:~ a:iog 05w~ tn::c ~t-.....J r.nu.cs <00 0:>-......o ou u..~:I:
Cl::>t:: wu:;~: ~u o..<,_ Ww~ 8:~25
tna:u ~::2
o..at:; ~wz r.n~,_ :C~,g; 1-<:::;;:
~ ~
E9
SAN DI.EGO COUNTY
A~SESSORS MAP
BOOK 204 PAtiE 27 SHT. I OF 2
' I
I
(f/:J
w
> <(
6i7
SHT I
At....i4.0 33'W • A•S'SZ!I.~S'
~-~ ~ ... 0 1P
J.,rp.9S I 3 7. SO 1 g ~ M3613
Q 2* ~~~ t;l' \::.:J ~ r. ~ 'V
0. 55AC. ~5:.:~~-:oro-a._
1'·,87'b?, N. '3"r"j}''N. • ........ "' .so., . ~Fl:3 ~ ..; ~ ~ 't
• '9·35 i-~ t:::\ h) •• 'Q "" ~ Nct)~ ' • ~
ul Mltooo $ a . _ =· ~ ~.34~3'w. J31·'l'2. z M174 ~TI5
LOTI7 /..JO SL"'-M3613.~> LOTI4 ~
f':::\ POR .., f.:\ ·: <:1 ~ \;:::) 17 ~ ~ ~ ;. ~
BLK M " 1 @ ~
N34•3t'40•w r30.ol /d~.~& POR 14· '0
~~~ @ 1* ~~ .@ ~ "' ~ BLK;. ~ ~ PAR I ~q, '0 2 '0 " ... : @ M ~
~ PM 16601 la 10".& -
'2: NS'f3l'31"W 130.01 w /ZO LOTI4
LOTI8 ti7.P8 > /28 LOTI3
G;) ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ~ \:!..J 119.ss POR 13 " ,.·:PORI8 tza ·: ~ ~:-G) ~,. @<§) @tza :·
~ '!;) 8 ~... 4 38 SHT l ~ ".· '0 ·:.
-:.· '--' .. -~ t;\ ~ ® @ ~
u
0
r-0~18 0 LOTI9-
C) ..,.;
....J -~ .. 0--/~ IS
1:)
ft)
~ ft) 5
@
" :· . '0 \ . I ": f5\ t-: ,t9 ' ~ \V ~~ 7
'0 M1747-o M3 3
.,.,
~ 1 W "·:PORI9 , 6
( LOTI9_-'"·"a ~P • .ra
I 1 ~0~01 10 0'0 .1 2
1
3 4 s;
. '
6o ~ "17 J 47
\ N..34°33' \fv
\ ~ rl-\ -o CARFI¢.LD
0
0
0
~
0
w
a: .
"' ~0 h
"'17 47
@) ~7
'
-f7 47
~~~ VLOTI3 ..
'0 ;;-,..: LOTI2 ii\
~ •. ?S 10
@
9
.. § ~
" 'I! POR12-:
8 'C~ '() .. -...::..:.; '0
t::::\ J~ Q :· ~:)!
d:6_13 Ml7~1o LOTI2
47
@ @ @
8 9 10
J17
N.34•33'W
ST. ~ '0
\ I ~ I // I I I '--.: -@
/OZ.
w
>
<(
/OZ.
eo
eo
~
;1:
w
?.04-27 ~
SHT. I OF 2 ,. , E9 1·100
;1:
08/19/2006 EBF
CHANGES
BLK OLD NEW jYR CUT
27Q tO 47148 bZ_ 2,'1
~9 ~~~ 8~ 4"1r~
44 49 87 1'3\
43 lm§§ '2 ~8.£
47 CON PM '-3 G2J
39 llMY 03 5526
49 CONDO 07 553
i I
c. c. I
U IOZ.
~
a: <{ ~0
~
~
I-
~
SHT. I
1*CONDO
HEMLOCK CARLSBAD
HOMEOWNERS ASSOC SOUTH
DOC92-312044
(SEE SHT2)
2*CONDO
VILLA PACIFICA
DOCS92-534325 & 06-064241
(SEE SHT2)
I.AP 11600-CARLSBAD TCT 83-39 (CONDO)
MAP 3613-PACIFIC TERRACE
MAP 1747-PALISADES-POR BLK M
ROS 18815
;1:
-'"" (\~
""'*'" l
;;:: --l
'}
~
@
SAN DIEGO COUN1Y
ASSESSOR'S MAP
8o
> <(
t-
:J z
:c
$o
TI-US lviAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSti.ENI" PURPOSES ONLY. NO UABIUW IS ASSUr..ntD FOR TI-lE ACCURACY OF THE DATA S!-!OWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS MAY NOT CO!I.iPLY WIT!-! lOCAl SUBDIVISION OR BUILDING ORDINANCES.
2ol.t-?":) ! """"-'"''--
SHT 1 OF 3
~,~
,,~,
I @ ~ \29
<l ~
.so
.S34-03:J'tf
cu~·~ 10
GAR
.so
(i)
A"-?
15 )~~~ 14 3
V~ . ~~ I !1o.. 1 ~Q·· 1
/S6 @ ~ ,.,.~.7? ·
12
16 17,10~ -c ~~sL~' @,sf 9 0 ~ t234, e :~~5-l 3: " ~-':A" 19 8 ' 8 ~ -G:\-..:....::..-1g f17', 13" g fr
E
50
~ ~.
v.::J \:..:.) * 20 148.74 PM19697 .J
@re @~ f@"wn" ~
~ ;If?-~ !'-.,
~
3
~ ~~ % -' ~-...:; ..... 4 ~
Q CARLS8t-,Q <:)
'
:::±
" ~ ~ ~ ~ -..;;::
~ lt9 ~:z
<l
I
0
1-
;:)
()
cr: >-
$:
LU z
0
-l
0
~
-I Ill
C\1 ~~ -.r ~~ ..g -.;;;
m ~
§i ~'::! '<>~ I \ ~e ............
~~ i=:J ·~ <1\ i': ~
1\l fl\ v ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ("\ !d:u C\1 ~8 tnU \9 ..... .....
·~ II--~ a=; ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ "' ~ ~ G
~ !; ~ ~ ~ ....... ~
(") 1'1.} (') !.'!'> ~ c-o !<\ C"' tfl ~ ~ <'.! ~
so
~ ~~ (!) ....
~ ~
~a. 0 0 wo ::s,_ ~ C)iVl 0
!l) !l)
~ ~ l'l C\1
............ -"= ~-
N.S4°33'W. .SJ-~· ."13 •t:
/28.:1.3 ~~0 ~ (;o SZ.1Z $283 SZ-7Z
@PAR A
0 G)
0 0~
3 2
8*
ST
(,0
0 liJ 0~ ?(
<:1 '\!¥
, S:J4o..J:.'$"d } 40~~~-~"""""""'~~ 0 tiko ~ GU3 1 CZ-?Z I 39.99 ~ '\'2>
"12•• -~
b) "l ~~--@ "t~ G) 0
PAR 1
§0~
D !'::' !-
'o
c
-:::~ 010 »"'·"'z,,9_! .. "'-m
/4£94-'-'-=""'L.:..--KI.J!~~ 17 /4U.?7 c::-. IPM16289 lti"·
•rJ' ~~.;<>:::;;! :;;t;>-:#_~_2_(_'· _18_~':!1: @ a ~r-PAR 9~ 0~ 19~ 1.;;·~·l!> .PM !6289
Q PM2616 150 D
1'-~\f> <
~
" "'
~ ~~~
~-~-
~
~ " ~
~
2 ~~ --~~
wQ ·~----=---··=·.. ' i ~ ~ o· co
tl G) G) ~ . !; ·r • --I 0@ . <(
'" ~ ~ 0 20 PAR
I 149 @
0 @2
«) ~ .... .... 0
~
.....
~ CXl
l'j
~
.,. ,.,,9 1so Pr•!:'llil!i. :J K 1:1'9-ll') )~
((
~
..-en C') C') 0 , ..... ..-
co co 0 0
0 0 I'-8 ..-
co oiS .,...
I'-N
~ !') ~ N
®.10 ~ 22 7 /SO ~
ti12 PA!~ ~ @so. "
'N i ;o ~ . :"2~
<( u 4..
<;
n. \!Yet)·~ -~ (() '! !,; N ~ ~ ~" 6
~. ~ ~ l ~ !:!
\ ....
Ci) 'U
3 .. <> .;
~
L
SZ-9.!!
G@
~
~ "
5·~" .. ~
~e 1 ®
~~
0
~,
p
~
:c
~~---§ ~~:"J,."fy 1 tV~ •~-,.-~.J }II' "" I :id 93 """" . ---Q I ~ • --• '-~. e
Q;i'l' '!::-
" ~
:'\.l ~co
~
·1 !:?
~-1! "'91'7<> it ·. I) £a.o7"·n ,..,;u ::2 1_---:._-r-_ -~r~l~ 6/J.I)t).
~b1 n P ~ '-" ' >
S2.yf.p S.fo"/7 ([ S3.o3
!e ~ L (!) .... .....
co 0 !
0 .....
0 ~ 0 z 0 L 0
..... ~ ..-
"'" (') I ~ ~
.$3oJ-CI :JJ~}
CXI-SD-28)
~ 'i"'CONDO 6*CONDO
{ \ LA POSADA JUNIPER BEACH t 31 ) DOC1977-045B747 DOC1983-0009807
.....:::._., (SEE SHT 2} (SEE S!-IT 2)
~CONDO 7*CONDO
MELE I ANDREWSLA POSADA NOB HILL
DOC1975-0360531 DOC1986-031 0521
(SEE SHT 2) (SEE SHT 3}
10"CONDO
MONROY PLACE
DOC1993-0305423
(SEESHT3)
11 * CONDO (PEND)
BABCOCK
DOC1993-0456627
-S'.JZ'iH.JS-£(<'-<) N31'Z~·s·· (tiwy) "-~z· W:ta·w (f'N)
BLVD
3" CONDO 8* CONDO . 12" CONDO
ACACIA Vll!.AS MAPLE COuRT JUNIPER AT GARFIELOMONROY PLACE
DOC1974-0086098 DOC1989-0509539 DOC2001-0242219
(SEE SHT 2) f!< DOC2q04-1221453 (SEE SHT 3)
4"CONDO ~ tSEESHf3) '!3*CONDO
CANTAMAR 9 CONDO VILLAS DE LUZ
DOC1974-0086101 & 1975-0068516 ACAIATOWNHOMES DOC2007-0197328 t~E!= RHT ?' OOC1990-0625207 & OOC2007-0611935 ,_ ---, .(SEESHT3} (SEESHT3)
<;)
~
5*CONDO · ~~~~~~-~6~'ts~7 MAP 8695-CARLSBAD TRACT 1\10 77-4 (LA POSADA)
Go
> <(
z
:J
J
~' 1 "=1 00'
~ \2)
!:lf'lf'llt ?nil. PAl~!:" ?~ <::1-rr 1 nl=" "'
CSEESHT2} MAP 1777-PALISADES EiGHTS REFILED
MAP 17/J?7-P.b~l I~AnF~
09
ASSESSMENT PAR. NO. ~ ~
204-234-09 SUB. ID ~-~
NOTE: EACH SUB. ID INCLUDES AN
UNO. INT. IN COMMON AREA
.
G) w . w
CANTAMAR
DOCS 74-86101 & 75-68516
BLK.I 1 LOT M
ASSESSMENT PAR. NO.
204-231-16 SUB. ID Q}) & ~
NOTE: EACH SUB. ID INCLUDES AN
UND. INT. IN COMMON AREA
s
204-23
._,( SHT. 2 ~
/c'-8-'r.f:Y~ NO SCALE
:J;¢.
LA POSADA
DOC 77-458747 . LOT I
<§)
[[§]--; I
ACACIA VILLAS I ~ I -4 DOC 74-86098 ___ -+
~ @ ®I I@ 2• 2• 2•
SEAVIEW VILLAS
r-"\
tO
' ~
c::J
-?
-.J
;I ;1:
3.
OJ [ID ~
I 2 3
...___
l!l ~
4 5
w ...J a. <(
:;E
---..1 .. :J
CARLSBAD BLVD.
PM 4283 I*
@PAR. I
MELE/ANDREWS
DOC 75-360531
BLK. D, LOT 5
ASSESSMENT PAR. NO.
204-233-11 SUB. ID Qi)& ~
BLK. I, LOT L
ASSESSMENT PAR. JNO.
204-231-17 SUB. ID lliJ & ~
NOTE: EACH
SUB. ID INCLUDES AN
UND. INT. IN COMMON AREA
PM 12449
G)
PAR. I
NOTE: EACH SUB. ID INCLUDES AN
UND. INT. IN COMMON AREA
2•
<( -l)
<(
l)
<(
[i]l~
I 2 @)
@)
PM 4283
CARLSBAD BLVD.
~ ~
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAP
BOOK .2.04 PAG£.2.:) ...
SHT. 2
s
"
I
I
(!] r ~ ;1:
11] I@
~ DOC 75-68517
BLK. I} LOT N
ASSESSMENT PAR. NO.
204-231 -13 SUB. ID lQil & lQa
NOTE: EACH SUB. ID INCLUDES AN
UNO. INT. IN COMMON AREA
CARLSBAD BLVD.
r JUNIPER BEACH Ul
OJI DOC 83-9807
BLK. 2) LOT M
(ID 2 ASSESS ME NT PAR. NO.
@) 3 a: 204-232-09 SUB. ID ~-~ w a.. NOTE: EACH SUB. ID INCLUDES AN -UNO. INT. IN COMMON AREA z
PM 12449 I ::::>
J
CONDOMINIUM
3* MAP 8695-CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 77-4
2• MAP 1777-PALISADES HEIGHTS REFI LED
•• MAP 1747 -PALISADES
09
'~ t\
., .. "'cri """-'w ~~~ 55~~ ;5!1'~
2~0 -~~ >-~no -'ln..J l5<ffi
Vl. ~Za: Q31:o tl:~z ~"'Q <!Q !z!<~ wClfi:l ~~~ I:HI-_,
~~iS
r::r::>-9 ou ..._Cf::x:
Cl::>t::: Wu31: ~u o.<,_ UJ~_, 8:1-3
"'r::r::u ~[2
O.Cl~ '~~ !!ltn~ ~~::::E
E9
w > <(
w .....1 0... <(
~
~ ~
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
ASS~SSOR"S MAP
GARFIELD ST
~
® ~flW9
MAPLE COURT
DOC89-509539
PAR A, PM 13291
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
204-233-21 SUB !D @!)-~
G/ ~<(, / ~\;<(,~ /
//
VILLAS DE LUZ
DOC07-611935
DOC07 -197328
PAR 1, PM 19697
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
204-234-17 SUB-ID IQj] -~
BOOK 204 PAGE 23 SHT 3
w ~
>-a:
0:: w
I u
EJ CfcL,
~
CARLSBAD
BLVD
GARFIELD ST
2
~
1
~
MONROY PLACE
DOC93-305423
BLK 2 LOT N
MAP 1777
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
204-232-14 SUB ID @I)-~
w > <(
0:: w a.. 1-4 z => J
JUNIPER AT GARFIELD
DOC01-242219
PAR 1, PM18667
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
204-232-05 SUB ID [Qj]-~
PM 13938
PAR
I ~@
2 ~I
3 ,.
PM 13938
CARLSBAD BLVD
CONDOMINIUM
204-23 ~
SHT3 ~
E9 NO SCALE
NOB HILL
DOC. 86-310521
BLK 2, LOT Q
MAP 1777
1 0/23/07 DEP
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
204-232 -II SUB I D @I)-\041
1• UNIT 3 IS FIRST FLOOR
ACACIA TOWNHOMES
DOC 90-625207
PM 16289 PAR I
)
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
204-233-22 SUB I D ~-lo3f
~ "\i~,j,. ,~ ...
f\t
~ i\.i
~.@'' I
13
-$-
®
@srrr.
.d..:i•;t~;-:~-~ ' , '.!1"----~:=="""";~=-===r""""'==/Zr==" . l ~~
. ,j(};;i;.7i''. lUdU'? ?.,;~10' ;, r <'>0 ~~~:.'). liS 65'i .. 5·.··· .~ ~,,,~~~J;a~~~~~~,,~;q~•m•·••'''''\
r,.,z; I ~ ~-· ·%;s ~· ~ ~ '~
f.""'\ @ ~ ~ ··"''"'·"'" ········ " t-.: "' s ,t!< CONDO .
V -r.: ~ • .co~"''. 11~-·• PM 12335
· . ' ,, • <'SEE S!-\1" 3) • ~ . ,. a 9 ~·· t;;(. PAR IS\ 1!.! , .£'~ I.'\ \.::!.Y t ... 4 ~ . ' •~""v ~ ~ ~ 2 . ~ t" 1~~~~--------=---=--==----==-======-=--lr------------------------------------:;~· ~ " PM1309l ~
> <(
<(
u
<( u
<(
()
~ N
N
~ wl..: . -~ i:i
Q lfl
mro Zh!
~
7
8
!'. 9
\i
:00~. :r
@
0.87 AC
0
0.87 AC
B Q
0
0
lfoG 0 :r®l~~@ r-e
"
0
·.·-~·· --~ ·-;~-::.
t-------------------------11
4.· ~.:.
0 ~·
"'
0 ~
@
0.87 AC -4
ll--l ;:!;,<!t!-"3'"3,'
PM 7248 Te..c;.-ao
CONDO
PARK .. TUN I PER
· DOC78-3007BO ~ (SEE SHT 2) 0
\" .. /~
Lo-r 1
0.70AC
~o~.~o·
~~~
t-1' ~
0 -t-1
@
0.87 A(j 2
3
M1803
796! 300. 7C,
(\j ''2'2. s.w::. ~@PM 1443Q i, 53 PAR ! r.
.;:; -
\'A"a.<OO ,
.....
PM 7248 :3
~
~
u CONDO ii CASA DE LA PLAYA" ~ OOC-74-158932 ® (SEE St-l"r 2).
O.~BAC ~ !:!?26J 31/t if7
M1747
~ ·.:-1::.4.» I 4<::•~-~ _.:r:r
5o ~~Jit~-:J?Il-.,.,'>-115"~ 0i®l@ ~ @
j
> <(
oc w
0.. -z
:J
}
/14-.o/l ·~ ;: LOT4 !I~
r<toT3 2~0 ..... In
":<:.
"' Ill
g
~ Ill~(;)
1-c:-!
0
Ill
U'llc' z ~ '" '" LOT2
r33l -.:::::;/
i'?-'!1
@)
@
I"Z.•~
@ It\ c~ ~~.,. •.... JU ····-
~~ .. ]>~"*"" 3 e -""' 7nY'#!J =--==-=;
.$ .• ~
\{\ ~ (.3f!) . ' ~ -'-/ ~
q " P R ~
(" @3·lif u'l rt PARI
;
LOT liS r:;;::..·
~
~j)
lJ)
-..t ~
t~ @
[ @ 41@
usPMl6596
!J 34°33'38"W @
~It: Q ~I '!Y
0 IJ1
"' \n
• ~·~ ~M!8~ . '"" M!747 @I@ e
.
..... .;-'
<(
~ u
0 _,
2
l!J
I
2~-CONDO {SEE Sl-IT 3)
CHRISTLE COVE
DOC8iH5632i
• 3'!KONDO
HEMLOCK CARL~3AD
HOMEOWNERS ASS~i.
DOC92-3 2046
(SEE SHT 3)
~ \[!) &;;. I
2'"'.1.1_2-"!· "~"'~ ' v-'," =:_ ~i a S'-l_l_ 'I 01-3 ~..,~""
I '' "'. -.:• Cit.~ IJ ~,,
"' :J!
6/18/200"1 s~• J
0 0 f@ I K. 0
0 ~ I 2 I 3 I 4 7 8 9 10
@
~ ~
12 .I
()
!!
BLI"\
2 3
0
4 5 ~ !! THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. f-0 Ll<\Bil:iTY IS I
ASSLJviEO FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE OAT A SHJWN. ASSESSOR ·s PARCELS • I MAY ~JT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISON OR BUILQING ORDINANCES. I.
(DO ?~.n '$() I ~o I 4't!!io
i GARFIELD
,-------------------------------------,
5 34° "5?>' !:'
~ .
1--l_c\-1 ERR-'1' ~VE/
'
Sl."n GPO 4:~ -<>:G 6>0
534.,;.::;·e
ST ~
SAt! DIEGO COU!HV ASSESSOR'S~AP BK 20~PG 211 SHTIOF:.f
MAP 7961 -C~~RLSBAD TCT NO 73-30
MAP 1803-PALISADES NO 2-BLKS Q&R
MAP 1747-PAL!SADES-BLt<S N &0
ROS 3234 .
$
09
~ ~
I
'\}
~
:1 :1'
~ ~
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
-~SSESSOR"S MAP
CASA DE LA PLAYA DOC74-158932 LOT I
MAP7961 ASSESSMENT PAR NO
204-240-55 SUB ID (QQ-~
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABIUTY IS
ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SI{)WN. ASSESSOR ·s PARCELS
MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISON OR BUILDING ORDINANCES.
:1'
RIVII( 204PAr.~ 24SHT~
~
@)
~,<?<v~
')0
CONDOMINIUMS
..
204-24 ~
SHT2 Jl ~NO SCALE s-;;,_ 75 ·' tfJ
,vii-V'
PARK JUNIPER DOC78-300780
LOT I
PM7248
:1'
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
204-240-54 SUB ID @I)-@)
09
~ :a:
"'-
;1:
BLDG B 4@]] I w
?i
~ @) ~
@ u
0 ~r~ _J
~ w
I[D I
I SLOG A
HEMLOCK CARLSBAD HOMEOWNERS
ASSN
DOC 92 -312046
PAR I PM 16596
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
204 -240-56-IQI}-[Q1}
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. 00 LIABliTY IS 1' •
ASSI.M:D FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA Sf{)WN. ASSESSOR ·s PARCELS
MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISON OR BUILDING ORDINANCES.
"
:F
..
204-24~~ SHT 3· ~
'5:-31· 9 7 ,At tft:, ~.
,------------------. NO SCALE
:a:
<ffi) @
OJ I I (ID2 I @)3 104
PARCEL MAP NO 12335
DOC 82-357174
P.~R I
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
204-240-36 SUB ID lQTI -~
®<§)
0lmt®lm 4 3 2 I
CHRISTLE COVE
DOC 84-156321
PAR r, PMI3091
liJ ~
~ u g
~ w J:
w
~
~ u
0
_J
~ w I
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
204-240-37 SUB ID IQI)-~
CONDOMINIUMS
:a:
SAN DiEGO COlJNlY
ASSESSOR'S MAP
~ \ED
BOOK 204 PAGE o25 SHT 1 OF 2
l ~~0
> <(
0..
/
~ ~
l
~ GARF E D
94.
MI0467 I
~~ I 0.~ o; 2~ ::::: ~@ ®
46 CONDO ilorf 9-m;-
OOC 82-2701!2 t
(SEE SHT 2) ~~ f8'\
M 10467 115.o::,~ • V
tlo)
'-../
E 7 -, I
\)
10~
®
~16
8
@
<:) ~,
,___ ___ _j 1-_j
s
:>a•t"<~3' E
so rll .-~~~ : r
0 w I I I ' ~ I . J >. L 01 ~L? ~
?i ~~810 1 01® 10 ~~-~ r 15 ~ 0 §r ·
I I I 48 H I 0. ., -48 . ·> • il ·f6 i •16 46~2"' ' ·-' .., __ l!
--120 !6 IO "'o a /Is .;-I IO /f6.6&
® 0 ~ 1~ ® 10 ~~
11 ~~zy" 9 I 11 1~9
® ,~»(?) I I_ ® ~0
18 8 . I I 8 BLK G 8
I') '\,•
® Bl~K I F7 0 ' ·I I ® ' 0
816 1 ®lev ··I ®10 ! @.7 I (6\. ~ 20 ~~6 1:) I ~ 20 I 6
11s . v ns :::S: ~ @) @ ,.0 "" 0 ~~ 0 -~ {g)
® ®
. PM20431 \.../ \ 4~ "'l:! I v i\46-· -,, 46 .-1-~9. 66 H 13808 ' 91.99 i!' l<l() ~~ ~r--;_· 0 t.. liS '-.::/ D //.6· ·._6_,.6 ~ 0 ' 0 1: 1 PAR A 3 Ll. ' 5 . , 0 h • 2 IPM3~l3 . ,
..-; • AR ~~ _j ~ Q ~ @ 5 I I PAR ·-!f :.~ @ ~~ z_ ~®~~v~ 0~1 ~-1 ~ n ·~® @ ~~ fi~J co~~ UJ ._ :::: m ::: -... "' tli u_, ~~-· .J .~. . I'
z ~,~ PAR 1
:J ~a_ @ ) z~
61)
0 ,... ~ ~
138.20
~ ,__ --C') -. l ' I v G ~ a..
~ I I!) .... "' ' ()" 11:::: ~ ' DM37!'<> ~ 1 . so . _11•1.76 '!i1• 0.. f 97.21f. .~ I· .• ~ , . }<: 79J f<~
4!!.04 ~~~ ( : : !~ !Z.;.<1~3 .Jt.?~~o.~ .. J~ _ _ _ _ _ _
83.05
N31°51'o9"w 230.33 1 N31"49'WW
S3Z"ZI'J5"E 4~'J5"11J I . :_ HYI/'V OP NO ACCESS : t~41o ' HWY ..,./. ~ 0 f;) ,._,cJfo~·~ ----L* -._,~-t XI-SO-~~ .• ¢ -----BLVD
@
~
OP
60 1 L!J
> ' <C I
1 .. ;· < ~ )I· "' . 0 60 .• :
.. iC . ' v
<(
((
<(
2
<(
1-
80
J j ~
SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP
'"'-~~ 204-25 ~i , SHT 1 OF 2 '·"'· ·~' ·1 "='I oo·
CONDO
06/17/20()fl ;.t9
f>v.m:-11··£·9.'> · !Jy;J]JOFrem:ii:O•f·25
!CHANGES
I !1l.!( I PRF.liHFH I WF/ '-PH 11'.'? !CI/T IJOt
· 20 I =o :s4!6151cc
~~ !JAM ... If, 1•l'Z 47BZ ST WIO
lz51 01-03
1251 4 &5 ,--!-_.;.;.,.:__+-_:::,.:___!-4~:--j
l I . I ~~ I I
I I I I 1--i
l ! I I I '
CAHLSBAD OCEANSIDE HOMES
DOC 75-55089
(SEE SHT 2)
2)ij.CONDO
GAHFIE!_O ST
DOC 81-256469
(SEE Sl-IT 2)
Tri!S MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. NO, LIABILITY IS
ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHOWN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS
MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISION OR BUilDING ORDINANCES.
MAP 0467-CARLSBAD TCT
MAP 1747-PAL SADES -BLKS
ROS 13290~ 16508
0 80"-21
E F & G
09
~ ~
' ~ ~
;I ;F
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PUnPOSES ONLY. ~LIABILITY IS
ASSWED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA SHJWN. ASSESSOR ·s PARCELS
MAY OOT CCJ..iPLY WITH LOCAL SUBDIVISON OR BliiLO!t{; OROINIINCES.
~ ~
J" SAN DIEGO .COUNT~'
-~: '' t\SSESSOR'S MAP
BOOK .2Q4PAGE .25. .. f.
SHT2 OF 2
~,<?X-~
.)\)
~<(,· ~
CARLSBAD TCT. 80-21
DOC 82-270111
LOT I
CARLSBAD OCEANSIDE
DOC 75-055089
*POR BLK F
.• <,.. ITJ A -~)\ @) c
~ ~ ~
(<>
~ ~ ~<$)
~<>
;F
\S'..>.
~ \'<>
~ASSESSMENT PAR. NO
204-253-02 SUB 10 §]-@)
NOTE:EACH SUB ID INCLUDES AN
UND. INT IN COMMON ARE
"
·loS' . 0 ;F . ~
·-~.·~ .).
•• "?
204-25
SHT 2
Jo·zt--8J .
.J&
j
NO SCALE
;F
tfJ
'\h,,.,
ASSESSMENT PAR. NUMBE.R
204-252-14 S U 8 I. D. [Q]J -1041
NOTE: EACH SUB 1.0. INCLUDES
A FRACTL .INT. IN' COMMON
AREA
'? -9;(\
~
<<:>
U'~
ASSESSMENT PAR. NO.
204-253-02 SUB. I D. (Ql]-(@
NOTE: EACH SUB. ID. INCLUDES
AN UND. INT. IN COMMON AREA
GARFIELD ST.
DOC 81-256469
BLK G LOT 13
CONDOMINIUMS
MAPI0467-CARLSBAD TCT. NO. 80-21
• MAP PM 3595 -PAR A
MAPI747-PALISADES BLKS E,F&G
1'-
N
'1·
~
'\~
sa:3[j wu i'.::~:z ~0:~ ~J.f"l~ o:o ~§i~
•W->-Ulo 2~5 .0 CD rn . wzc:: rn:;::o ~9:z §§mQ a.<u:J ~--~~ mo@ ii§UJ~ rn:c ~~---ll tnu-(5 <00 0::)-_, ou u.Cl!:;:
Cl:::>!= IS!~~ ct<,_ :5!~ct 0..1-25 ~a:u ~~ o..ol3 ~wz {!>~,_ ~~~
SAN DI.EGO COUNTY
ASSESSORS MAP
BOOK 204 PA<jE 27 Sl-IT. I OF' 2
tP
>~
cb ~
s
,.,.
-~
0
~
:c
t5o
~". I '\ ~l
r:;::.. 2*
~
. 0.55AC. ~~·-·"
N.$7<> ' .. -·~"" .3ro.o~c So" . .
f?=3s .:. 9·3o
-.r MllOOO
i\!.34"33'W. !3!."1~ LOT!7 ~ ¥i!lil&~·-!llfr·--..:..·:.:.;···'-!..:·~·illL..-4
r~, @~~R
'<~· BLK
!.til..., Q, ~ \.!; i47l .,, ~~ -.6 '--" ' ~~~ PAR l 0 if? PM 1660!
2 N~#31'3tw 130.DI
LOTIEI /I'JI.t?D
'!) r--...
" "()
k ">-:POR N
11$~~· \V ~, •• ~' '-" I 19.58 I
<I ~ :·
In!'-. 0 '-1'1 'l:i f.\ ~ \!;1.
1,:0~'!8 0
LOTI9--. .;: ·: • \() .· !'51 1-.
~ \J
'4.:PORI9
"' .. G> l'>
~ '0 A
@® ,,.,.
"'<II ~ ~ ~~---~ '
'\)
(')
~ (')
'"~ ~' <:)
10
'll
3
®
5
6
(;')2 ' d
4
FIELD
«'$
to)
1\j
'
>
<(
C1
-
0
~ ::;s,.
D.
l!J cc
,:).Gf
""#(
~;){""""'"""""-""!!='"""' /37. sa
13613
8
/2Q
/28
@
POR /2;}
IZ.O
EV
~
\:)
LOTI4
LOTI3
i;:;~ ...,,·~ ~ LOT !3
'0.~~ LOTI2
.. ,
\1)
@ 1~@
POR 9 '~
Q !>) ~ (.41) 8 'C'/ \:l. '-../
M3513 M!747 tf'" 120 §',e @I®
1 I 8 9 I 0
~i
'
"" 7 I "'1 1 1 1 .. , ; !12-,.. . "' /',/, 34c33• W ,,...,.J).t...~
ST.
I /'r ----------@ I
/OZ.
~-}
<! ..
10'2-
eo
e;o
~
6o
.~~ _,
j
Sl-IT. 0 ,--, l-L
08/19/2006 EBF
1"'CONDO
1-!EMLOCK CARLSBAD
HOMEOWNERS ASSOC SOUTH
DOC92-312044
(SEESHT2)
2"CONDO
VILLA PACIFICA
DOCS92-534325 & 06·06424 i
(SEE SHT2)
11600-CARLSBAD TCT 83-39 (CONDO)
3613-PACIFIC TERRACE
1747-PALISADES-POR BLK
ROS 18815
~;
~ l\l
I
~ C\1
09
E9
I l ~~vj >-ww t::uu =~~ a:JO.""' ~Ill~ Sf~o 1./)!2! ~l7.1c z~~ 0 i:c
In l7.1Za: ~~0
:::>Vlz Ci.<~ !z!<~ 1 I wCl£5
OSw::::o cn::x:l.ll l7.1t-_,
!':i~lS gs~9
u..~:::t: C::::ot-!:!iu§i ..:cU ~;~ c. I-~ lna:ts 3:ie ~53~ en~ ~~~
tv\
"i.¢-~· ~~
~~
ovf..
~~~\;
2ND FLOOR
®
@
2ND FLOOR ONLY
VILLA PACIFICA
DOCS92-534325 & 06 -064241
LOT 1-MAP 11600
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
204-270-49 SUB ID I 011-IT!]
I
HEMLOCK CARLSBAD
HOMEOWNERS ASSOC
SOUTH
DOC92-31~044
PAR 1-PM 16601
~<(,· ~ /
ASSESSMENT PAR. NO.
204-210-47 sus. 10 @Q-Io31
CONDOMINIUM
I
204-27 ) SHT 2
~
NO SCALE
08/19/06 EBF ~
E9
-'()
' I
~-~
~-
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAP
~~~ T!-liS MAP WAS PHEPMEO F~~ ASSESS!iJ:NT Pu~;~·;cS C~NtY. NO Ui\BILHY IS
ASSUMtfJ FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE DATA Sl-10\lliN. ASSESSOR'S PARCELS 1 !I.AY NOT COM!'LY WrrN LOCAL SUBOMSION OR BllltDING OHD!NANCES.
!,
\.
\ '\ \ ' \. 0~ .... ? ''l,
-')) \. < \ ._r* \
v<$) \
:1 \
0 \
~~
®
\r \"'>--~;..
® 31
~\"'1~ " :;. \~ -~'.o \,.. " \A. ~
\ --'~--'
'\""")-<1ih
\·/. '\ 0
'\ /}
'~./ ' \\
\ 9-o\
\\
.\ ..
'"':?<_ "" , ~ .. c~ ., . ·-~ \ "''' '~-\(!/ ·:.
'"' / "' 'o / o 'o •
\ ..
' ~ ',.~
(L-\
<:::) "~\.
v f'!/_,
•./
./
~"\~
•.
/ ,. <
,--~
\ • ~\\
' . \
., ..
\ .. .
\
' • \
BOOK 206 BAGE 01 SHT 1 OF 2
\
\\
'· . .
/'
@
.(\3-
'!"CONDO STRATFOI~O SQUARE
OOC73-98'l87
(SEESHT2)
2"CONDO
3980 & 3982 GA.qFIELD ST
iJOC91-603531
(SEESHT2)
206-
SHT OF 2
"=100'
07!09108 A LL
"f __,,.., .. ,r . ,. .. ·-r ... \Ui M cc II ,_,
cc
-·CARLSBAD TCT 84.:.. (CONDM)
-CARLSBAD TCT 81-44{CONDM)
-PALISADES
ooWOO -'--lUI ~LIJ6 -·~:z -1 .-<( -< ... z ~0..5
:::ig"JfX og§O
Z(f.)(!) -ill~ ~wa :z(f.)-l
o<e:J
ct;; .. ro wz (f.)$1X o 0 o
:i::Cz :J(/.)0 o_;::t-,-(/) 1-<(-z.--.> !.LI '-'-LIJO ::Z:cOO 00 '-::l ro.-oo
LU Li .. (f.)Q-l ~>-(§ (~~0 0..;;,-l u..OC o::l::C
1.1.181-~<(S
IJ..LIJ>-LIJ :c -l IX 1-f.l..
(!_ ::2 ~50 :s;:u..u
a_OI-
<( l.l! 0 :2:::Z:Z
CI):J 5:~~ 1-<C:::Z
SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP
BOOK 206 i1AGE 02 SHT 1 OF 2
~
I i ~ ®
/ .z, .-:' /A~
r;~-<..'o
/ ·. '?.
PAR 1
@
0.54AC
\
\
'I
@)
0.99AC
CONDO
CARLSBAD BEAC!-1 VILLAS
OOC1985-0032172
(SEE Si-11"2)
t2a4\ \-1 '0/
SHT 1
'I
0
0.70AC
3*
--I
PAR.
(31) ......._,
1.07 AC.
\
~020) ~~
r -/ . )-.
\J"
"A"'
POR.37
PAR2
@
·i.22AC
@
~
@
'l* POR PAR 1A
SBE MAP 804 -37 -8B
2*CONDO
TAMARACK BEACl-ll.OHS
DOC2009-01 09928
(SEE S!1T2)
3*CONDO
SEA BREEZE VILLAS
DOC2013-00877 44
(SEE SHT 2)
15864 -CARLSBAD TCT
13721-CARLSBAD TCT
206-02
·1 OF 2
09/05/'13 ARS
MAP 11075-CARLSBAD TCT 84-3 (CONDO)
MAP 1803-PAUSADI=S NO 2 ·
PB 1 PG 153-RHO AGUA HEDIONDA
SEC 7-T12S--NW 1/4 POR
ROS 19230
'!"=100'
cc
09
ASSESSMENT PAR.~·
206-020-05 SUB lD ~-los!
LA VERCIA
DOC 99-783356
LOT 1, MAP 13721
CARLSBAD BEACH VILLAS
DOC 85-032172
LOT 1, MAP 11075
@)
~\~ o...0~ ci''~~l~·
~<;;,.
~cf.
~'r'-~~
TAMARACK BEACH LOFTS
DOC09 - 1 09929
PAR 1-PM20186
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
206-020-03 SUB ID @:TI -I 041
~~ ~vf.
'<..~~~
SEA B,REEZE VILLAS
DOC 13 -00877 44
LOT 1-MAP 15864
L-..16-02
SHT 2
ASSESSMENT PAR NO
206-020-08 SUB ID @] -~
CONDOMINIUM
!
NO SCALE
'lJ
09/05/13 ARS
E~ _ _test J. Dronenburg, JL.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
1600 Pacific Highway, Suite I 03
San Diego, CA 92101-2480
Tel. (619) 236-3771 *Fax (619) 557-4056
www.sdarcc.com
RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260
P.O. Box 121750 *San Diego, CA92112-1750
Tel. (619)237-0502 *Fax (619)557-4155
Transaction#: 355501820160114
Deputy: ASTEVENS
Location: COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
14-Jan-2016 16:46
FEES:
50.00 Qty of 1 Fish and Game Filing Fee for Ref# RCT 20160054
~-----
50.00 TOTAL DUE
PAYMENTS:
50.00 Check
50.00 TENDERED
SERVICES AVAILABLE AT
OFFICE LOCATIONS * Tax Bill Address Changes
* Records and Certified Copies:
Birth/ Marriage/ Death/ Real Estate
* Fictitious Business Names (DBAs)
* Marriage Licenses and Ceremonies
* Assessor Parcel Maps * Property Ownership
* Property Records
* Property Values * Document Recordings
SERVICES AVAILABLE ON-LINE AT
www.sdarcc.com
* Forms and Applications
* Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
* Grantor/ Grantee Index
* Fictitious Business Names Index (DBAs) * Property Sales * On-Line Purchases
Assessor Parcel Maps
Property Characteristics
Recorded Documents
state of California-Natural Resources Agency
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
2016 ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT
SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE. TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY
LEAD AGENCY
CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION
COUNTY/STATEAGENCY OF FILING
RECEIPT#
SD2016 0054
STATE CLEARING HOUSE#(ttappticabte;
DATE
1/14/2016
DOCUMENT NUMBER
San Diego *20160054*
PROJECT TITLE PUD 15-17/SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11 -GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
PROJECT APPLICANT NAME
RREG INVESTMENTS SERIES, LLC SERIES 1019
PROJECT APPLICANT ADDRESS
3005 S. EL CAMINO REAL
PROJECT APPLICANT (Check appropriate box):
0 Local Public Agency 0 School District
CHECK APPLICABLE FEES:
0 Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
0 .Mitigated/Negative Declaration (MND)(NID)
CITY
SAN CLEMENTE
0 Other Special District
0 Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board only)
0 Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs (CRP)
Ill County Administrative Fee
D Project that is exempt from fees
I{] Notice of Exemption (attach)
0 CDFW No Effect Determination (attach)
0 other
PAYMENT METHOD:
STATE
CA
0 State Agency
$3,070.00 $
$2,210.25 $
$850.00 $
$1,043.75 $
$50.00 $
$
PHONE NUMBER
949-637-3254
ZIP CODE
92672
IRJ Private Entity
$50.00
0Cash 0 Credit !ll Check 0 Other 7016 TOTAL RECEIVED $ $50.00 ------
SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME AND TITLE
X AMBER STEVENS Deputy
City of Carfsbacl
JAN 2015
Planning Division
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
ORIGINAL-PROJECT APPLICANT COPY-CDFW/ASB COPY-LEAD AGENCY COPY-COUNTY CLERK DFG 753.5a (Rev. 11/14)
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
To: SO County Clerk
Attn: James Scott
1600 Pacific Highway, Suite 260
PO Box 121750
San Diego, CA 92101
From: CITY OF CARLSBAD
Planning Division 1 ~-16
1635 Faraday Avenue , L
Carlsbad, CA 92008 BY -~kr J TCrrertS ~ DEPUTY {760) 602-4600
Subject: Filing of this Notice of Exemption is in compliance with Section 21152b of the Public Resources
Code (California Environmental Quality Act).
Project Number and Title: PUD 15-17/SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11-Garfield Custom Beach Homes
~ ____ . ______ ProjecLLocatian-=-Sp.ecific3.806_Ga rfieldStre.et,_CarJshad.£.1\. __________________ _
Project location-City: Carlsb:.::a=-=d'-------Project location -County: ::.:Sa=-on_:_:::_D'-=iecog=-o ____ _
Description of Project: Demolish existing single-family home and detached garage and construct two
detached condominium units.
Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: '-'A""u-"-'st,_,_,in'-'--"'-S'-'-ilv""'a,__ ______________ _
Name of Applicant: RREG Investments Series lLC Series 1019
Applicant's Address: 3005 S. El Camino Real, San Clemente, CA 92672
Applicant's Telephone Number: =-94~9=--..:::6=-3-=-7 --=3=2=-54-'-----------------------
Exempt Status: (Check One)
0 Ministerial (Section 21080(b}(1); 15268};
0 Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
0 Emergency Project {Section 21080(b)(4); 15269 (b)(c));
~ Categorical Exemption-State type and section number: 15332 -In-fill Development Project
0 Statutory Exemptions-State code number: __ __:_·..;..c--'. ----------------
0 General rule (Section 15061(b)(3))
Reasons why project is exempt: Redevelopment of on in-fill lot that is less than five acres and is already
served by existing infrastructure.
lead Agency Contact Person: '-'A""u-"-'st,_,_,inc:...:::.:Si'-'-'lv'-"a'-------Telephone: 760-602-4631
DON NEU, City Planner Date
Date received for filing at OPR:
Revised 05/13
~::)~ ~~-~\;~~\-~l!~\J(~
PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY" sTUDY
FOR
3806 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA
Discretionary Permit
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CA
PREPARED FOR:
RINCON REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC.
1520 N. EL CAMINO REAL, UNIT 5
SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92672
(949) 637-3354
PREPARED BY:
PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
535 N. HIGHWAY 101, SUITE A
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
(858) 259-8212
Prepared: July 20, 2015
. LER G. LAWSON, RCE 80356 DATE
PLSA 2319-01
Executive Summary
Introduction
Existing Conditions
Proposed Project
Conclusions
References
Methodology
Introduction
TABLE OF CONTENTS
County of San Diego Criteria
Runoff Coefficient Determination
Hydrology & Hydraulic Model Output
Pre-Developed Hydrologic Calculations (100-Year Event)
Post-Developed Hydrologic Calculations (100-Year Event)
Detention Volume Calculations
Appendix
Isopluvial Maps
Intensity Duration Design Charts
Runoff Coefficients
Overland Flow I Initial Time of Concentration
Hydrologic Soil Group -USDA Web Soil Survey
Pre-Development Hydrology Node Map
Post-Development Hydrology Node Map
SECTION
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
4.0
PLSA 2319-01
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 Introduction
This Preliminary Hydrology Study for the proposed development at 3806 Garfield Street
has been prepared to analyze the hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics of the existing
and proposed project site. This report intends to present both the methodology and the
calculations used for determining the runoff from the project site in both the pre-
developed (existing) conditions and the post-developed (proposed) conditions produced
by the 2-year, 1 0-year, and 1 00-year, 6-hour storm.
1.1 Existing Conditions
The subject property is located along Garfield Street, at the intersection of Garfield Street
and Hemlock Avenue, in the City of Carlsbad. The site is bound by existing residential
developments to the south and east of the property, Garfield Street to the west, and
Hemlock Avenue to the north of the property. The existing site consists of an existing
residence, driveways, and associated improvements. The project site is located in the
Agua Hedionda Hydrologic Area, and, more specifically, the Los Monos Hydrologic
Sub-Area (904.31 ).
The existing site can be categorized into one drainage basin, and primarily drains from
the southwest to the northeast corner of the site and out to Hemlock A venue. Existing
curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements along Garfield Street and Hemlock Avenue
prevent any offsite drainage from entering the parcel to the west and north. Existing
residential properties to the south and east prevent cross lot drainage from passing
through the site. The existing drainage basin has an approximate area of 0.15 acres and is
approximately 25% impervious. Per the Web Soil Survey application available through
the United States Department of Agriculture, the basin is generally categorized to have
group B soils. Based on the existing impervious area, a pre-development runoff
coefficient of 0.41 was calculated using the methodology described in section 3 .1.2 of the
San Diego County Hydrology Manual and the formula provided therein. Using the
Rational Method Procedure outlined in the San Diego County Hydrology Manual, a peak
flow rate and time of concentration were calculated for a 1 00-year, 6-hour storm event.
For the existing drainage basin, the peak flow rate for the 100-year, 6-hour storm was
determined to be 0.4 cfs at the point of discharge from the site with a time of
concentration of 5.0 minutes. Refer to pre-development hydrology calculations included
in Section 3.1 of this report for a detailed analysis of the existing drainage basin, as well
as a pre-development hydrology node map included in Appendix A of this report for pre-
development drainage basin delineation and discharge locations.
1.2 Proposed Project
The proposed project includes the demolition of all existing onsite improvements and the
construction of a 2-unit detached condo map with associated landscaping and hardscape
improvements. Site grading along with road, drainage and utility improvements typical
PLSA 2319-01
of residential development will also be constructed. The proposed building pad
elevations are 61.3 feet for the westerly unit and 58.6 feet for the easterly unit in an
attempt to match the existing sloping terrain.
In the resulting post-developed condition, runoff can be categorized into one drainage
basin similar to the existing site. Each unit will convey runoff by means of vegetated
swales to proposed area drains located along the northern boundary of the property.
Once water is collected in the area drains, PVC under drain pipes will discharge the
runoff into the existing curb and gutter on Hemlock A venue.
The proposed drainage basin has an approximate area of 0.15 acres and is approximately
59% impervious. As in the existing condition, runoff is prevented from entering the site
due to curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements along Hemlock A venue, and the
neighboring residential developments to the south and east. Based on the proposed
impervious area, a runoff coefficient of 0.64 was calculated using the methodology
described in section 3 .1.2 of the San Diego County Hydrology Manual and the formula
provided therein. Using the Rational Method Procedure outlined in the San Diego
County Hydrology Manual, a peak flow rate and time of concentration were calculated
for a 100-year, 6-hour storm event. For the proposed drainage basin, the peak flow rate
for the 100-year, 6-hour storm was determined to be 0.6 cfs at the ultimate point of
discharge with a time of concentration of 5.0 minutes. The existing curb and gutter is
adequately sized to handle the 0.2 cfs increase in peak runoff due to the proposed
development during the 1 00-year, 6-hour storm event. A storm drain curb inlet located
approximately 150 feet east of the project on Hemlock A venue will then collect runoff
from the curb and gutter and direct it to the public storm drain system. Refer to post-
development hydrology calculations included in Section 3.2 of this report for detailed
analysis of Basins C and D, as well as a post-development hydrology node map included
in Appendix A of this report for post-development drainage delineation and discharge
locations.
In an effort to comply with the City of Carlsbad storm water standards, the proposed site
has incorporated LID design techniques to optimize the site layout. Runoff from
proposed roofs and hardscape areas will be directed to vegetated swales in an effort to
disperse drainage to pervious surfaces. The swales will remove sediment and particulate-
bound pollutants from storm water and will assist in decreasing peak runoff by increasing
the site's overall time of concentration.
1.3 Conclusions
Based upon the analysis included in this report, the proposed onsite increase in peak
runoff as a result of the proposed development does not cause additional impacts to
downstream properties or existing drainage facilities. Similar to the existing condition,
the post-developed site will discharge directly into the curb and gutter system on
Hemlock A venue. Once in the gutter, drainage will be conveyed to an existing curb inlet
located approximatdy 150 feet east of the project boundary, and will enter the buried
pipe network. Water will not be diverted away from existing drainage patterns, and the
PLSA 2319-01
increase in proposed impervious area and resulting peak runoff will not have an adverse
effect on the downstream watershed. The post-developed site will be exempt from
hydromodification compliance requirements as it discharges directly into existing public
storm drain infrastructure. Additional analysis and design will be required to verify that
the proposed project is in compliance with current stormwater quality regulations.
1.5 References
"San Diego County Hydrology Manual", revised June 2003, County of San Diego,
Department of Public Works, Flood Control Section.
"San Diego County Hydraulic Design Manual", revised October 2012, County of San
Diego, Department of Public Works, Flood Control Section
"City of Carlsbad Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan", adopted January 14,
2011, City of Carlsbad, Engineering Department
"Low Impact Development Handbook-Stormwater Management Strategies", revised
July 2014, County of San Diego, Department of Public Works
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of
Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvev.nrcs.usda.gov.
Accessed July 20, 2015
PLSA 2319-01
2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Introduction
The hydrologic model used to perform the hydrologic analysis presented in this report
utilizes the Rational Method (RM) equation, Q=CIA. The RM formula estimates the
peak rate of runoff based on the variables of area, runoff coefficient, and rainfall
intensity. The rainfall intensity (I) is equal to:
Where:
1 = 7.44 x P6 x n-0645
I= Intensity (in/hr)
P6 = 6-hour precipitation (inches)
D = duration (minutes -use Tc)
Using the Time of Concentration (Tc), which is the time required for a given element of
water that originates at the most remote point of the basin being analyzed to reach the
point at which the runoff from the basin is being analyzed. The RM equation determines
the storm water runoff rate (Q) for a given basin in terms of flow (typically in cubic feet
per second (cfs) but sometimes as gallons per minute (gpm)). The RM equation is as
follows:
Where:
Q=CIA
Q= flow (in cfs)
C = runoff coefficient, ratio of rainfall that produces storm water
runoff (runoff vs. infiltration/evaporation/absorption/etc)
I = average rainfall intensity for a duration equal to the Tc for the
area, in inches per hour.
A = drainage area contributing to the basin in acres.
The RM equation assumes that the storm event being analyzed delivers precipitation to
the entire basin uniformly, and therefore the peak discharge rate will occur when a
raindrop that falls at the most remote portion of the basin arrives at the point of analysis.
The RM also assumes that the fraction of rainfall that becomes runoff or the runoff
coefficient C is not affected by the storm intensity, I, or the precipitation zone number.
PLSA 2319-01
2.2 County of San Diego Criteria
As defined by the County Hydrology Manual dated June 2003, the rational method is the
preferred equation for determining the hydrologic characteristics of basins up to
approximately one square mile in size. The County of San Diego has developed its own
tables, nomographs, and methodologies for analyzing storm water runoff for areas within
the county. The County has also developed precipitation isopluvial contour maps that
show even lines of rainfall anticipated from a given storm event (i.e. 100-year, 6-hour
storm).
One of the variables of the RM equation is the runoff coefficient, C. The runoff
coefficient is dependent only upon land use and soil type and the County of San Diego
has developed a table of Runoff Coefficients for Urban Areas to be applied to basin
located within the County of San Diego. The table categorizes the land use, the
associated development density (dwelling units per acre) and the percentage of
impervious area. Each of the categories listed has an associated runoff coefficient, C, for
each soil type class.
The County has also illustrated in detail the methodology for determining the time of
concentration, in particular the initial time of concentration. The County has adopted the
Federal Aviation Agency's (FAA) overland time of flow equation. This equation
essentially limits the flow path length for the initial time of concentration to lengths under
100 feet, and is dependent on land use and slope. The time of concentration minimum is
5 minutes per the County of San Diego requirements.
2.3 Runoff Coefficient Determination
As stated in section 2.2, the runoff coefficient is dependent only upon land use and soil
type and the County of San Diego has developed a table of Runoff Coefficients for Urban
Areas to be applied to basin located within the County of San Diego. The table, included
at the end of this section, categorizes the land use, the associated development density
(dwelling units per acre) and the percentage of impervious area.
PLSA 2319-01
3.0 HYDROLOGY MODEL OUTPUT
3.1 Pre-Developed Hydrologic Model Output (100-Year Event)
Pre-Development:
Q=CIA
Pz=1.2
P10=l.7
PJOo=2.5
Basin 1
Total Area= 6,319 sf-+ 0.145 Acres
Impervious Area= 1,594 sf-+ 0.037 Acres
Pervious Area = 4, 725 sf-+ 0.108 Acres
Cn, Weighted Runoff Coefficient
-0.25, Cn value for natural ground, Type B soils
*Per San Diego Hydrology Design Manual (SDHDM) Section 3.1.2
-0.9, C value for developed I impervious surface
* Per SDHDM Section 3.1.2
Cn = 0.9 x 1,594 sf+ 0.25 x 4,725 sf= 0.41
6,319 sf
Tc = 5.0 Min (minimum for small areas)
P6= 2.5
I= 7.44 X P6X D-0645
I= 7.44 x 2.5 x 5.0-0645 ;:::; 6.59 inlhr
I10o;:::; 6.59 in/hr
Iz;:::; 3 . 16 in/hr
110;:::; 4.48 in/hr
Q2 = 0.41 x 3.16 in/hr x 0.145 Ac = 0.19 cfs
Qto = 0.41 x 4.48 in/hr x 0.145 Ac = 0.27 cfs
Qtoo = 0.41 x 6.59 in/hr x 0.145 Ac = 0.39 cfs
PLSA 2319-01
3.2 Post-Developed Hydrologic Model Output (100-Year Event)
Post-Development (without considering HMP/BMP treatment):
Q=CIA
P2=l.2
P10=l.7
PJOo=2.5
Basin 1
Total Area= 6,319 sf-+ 0.145 Acres
Impervious Area= 3,773 sf-+ 0.086 Acres
Pervious Area= 2,546 sf-+ 0.059 Acres
Cn, Weighted Runoff Coefficient
-0.25, Cn value for natural ground, Type B soils
* Per San Diego Hydrology Design Manual (SDHDM) Section 3.1.2
-0.9, C value for developed I impervious surface
* Per SDHDM Section 3.1.2
Cn = 0.9 x 3,773 sf+ 0.25 x 2,546 sf= 0.64
6,319 sf
Tc = 5.0 Min (min. for small areas)
P6= 2.5
I= 7.44 x P6x D-0645
I= 7.44 x 2.5 x 5.o-o 645 :::::: 6.59 inlhr
I10o:::::: 6.59 inlhr
b:::::: 3.16 in/hr
I10:::::: 4.48 inlhr
Qz = 0.64 x 3.16 in/hr x 0.145 Ac = 0.30 cfs
Qto = 0.64 x 4.48 in/hr x 0.145 Ac = 0.42 cfs
Qtoo = 0.64 x 6.59 in/hr x 0.145 Ac = 0.61 cfs
Pre-Development vs. Post-Development (Discharge Leaving Site):
Pre-Development
Qtoo = 0.39 cfs
Post-Development
Qtoo = 0.61 cfs
Delta
0.22 cfs
PLSA 2319-01
4.0 APPENDIX
PLSA 2319-01
I County of San Diego
Hydrology Manual
Rainfall Isopluvials
2 Year Rainfall Event - 6 Hours
N
*E s
3 0 3 -L __
lsopluvial (inches)
\\\~ Have San (~:overed:
THIS MAP IS PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES
OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
Copyright SanGIS. All Rights Reserved.
This products may contain information from the SANDAG Regional
Information System which cannot be reproduced without the
written permission of SANDAG.
This product may contain information which has been reproduced with
permission granted by Thomas Brothers Maps.
Miles
I
I
County of San Diego
Hydrology Manual
Rainfall Isopluvials
10 Year Rainfall Event-6 Hours
N
~E
s
3 0 3
~--·
lsopluvial (inches)
THIS MAP IS PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES
OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright SanGIS. All Rights Reserved.
This products may contain information from the SANDAG Regional
Information System which cannot be reproduced without the
written permission of SANDAG.
This product may contain information which has been reproduced with permission granted by Thomas Brothers Maps.
Miles
County of San Diego
Hydrology Manual
Rainfall Isopluvials
100 Year Rainfall Event-6 Hours
N fE
s
3 0 3
~--·
lsopluvial (inches)
THIS MAP IS PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES
OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Copyright SanGIS. All Rights Reserved.
This products may contain information from the SANDAG Regional
Information System which cannot be reproduced without the
written permission of SANDAG.
This product may contain information which has been reproduced with
permission granted by Thomas Brothers Maps.
Miles
5 1 e 9 1'o 15 20 30 40 50
Minutes Duration
2 3 4 5 e
Houts
7'
f ,
~~ 6.0 >L
5.6 g
5.0 g
4.5 5'
4.0 ~
3+5~
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
lntensity~Duration Design Chart ~ Example
Directions for Application:
{1) From precipitation maps determine 6 hr and 24 hr amounts
for the selected frequency. These maps are included in the
County Hydrology Manual (10, 50, and 100 yr maps included
in the Design and Procedure Manual).
(2) Adjust 6 hr precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within
the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr precipitation {not
applicaple to Desert).
{3) Plot 6 hr precipitation on the right side of the chart.
(4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines.
{5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for the location
being analyzed.
Application Form:
(a) Selected frequency ___§Q__ year
3 . Pe 4 ~'2" (b) P6 = m. P24 = 5.5 -= 5 .5 %' J -~ ' -~·p24 -~
(c) Adjusted P6(2l"' _3_ in.
(d) tx = ____3Q_ min.
(e) I= ~ in./hc
Note: This chart replaces the Intensity-Duration-Frequency
curves used since 1965.
6
1·~"76
f57
1.30
113 ·1.1li:i
FIGURE
3-2
San Diego County Hydrology Manual
Date: June 2003
Table 3-1
Section:
Page:
RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR URBAN AREAS
Land Use I Runoff Coefficient "C"
Soil T~]2e
NRCS Elements Coun Elements % IMPER. A B
Undisturbed Natural Terrain (Natural) Permanent Open Space 0* 0.20 0.25
Low Density Residential (LDR) Residential, 1.0 DU/A or less 10 0.27 0.32
Low Density Residential (LDR) Residential, 2.0 DU/A or less 20 0.34 0.38
Low Density Residential (LDR) Residential, 2.9 DU/A or less 25 0.38 0.41
Medium Density Residential (MDR) Residential, 4.3 DU/A or less 30 0.41 0.45
Medium Density Residential (MDR) Residential, 7.3 DU/A or less 40 0.48 0.51
Medium Density Residential (MDR) Residential, 10.9 DU/A or less 45 0.52 0.54
Medium Density Residential (MDR) Residential, 14.5 DU/A or less 50 0.55 0.58
High Density Residential (HDR) Residential, 24.0 DU/A or less 65 0.66 0.67
High Density Residential (HDR) Residential, 43.0 DU/A or less 80 0.76 0.77
Commercial/Industrial (N. Com) Neighborhood Commercial 80 0.76 0.77
Commercial/Industrial (G. Com) General Commercial 85 0.80 0.80
Commercial/Industrial (O.P. Com) Office Professional/Commercial 90 0.83 0.84
Commercial/Industrial (Limited I.) Limited Industrial 90 0.83 0.84
Commercial/Industrial (General I.) General Industrial 95 0.87 0.87
c
0.30
0.36
0.42
0.45
0.48
0.54
0.57
0.60
0.69
0.78
0.78
0.81
0.84
0.84
0.87
3
6 of26
D
0.35
0.41
0.46
0.49
0.52
0.57
0.60
0.63
0.71
0.79
0.79
0.82
0.85
0.85
0.87
*The values associated with 0% impervious may be used for direct calculation of the runoff coefficient as described in Section 3.1.2 (representing the pervious runoff
coefficient, Cp, for the soil type), or for areas that will remain undisturbed in perpetuity. Justification must be given that the area will remain natural forever (e.g., the area
is located in Cleveland National Forest).
DU/A =dwelling units per acre
NRCS =National Resources Conservation Service
3-6
San Diego County Hydrology Manual
Date: June 2003
Section:
Page:
3
12 of26
Note that the Initial Time of Concentration should be reflective of the general land-use at the
upstream end of a drainage basin. A single lot with an area of two or less acres does not have
a significant effect where the drainage basin area is 20 to 600 acres.
Table 3-2 provides limits of the length (Maximum Length (LM)) of sheet flow to be used in
hydrology studies. Initial Ti values based on average C values for the Land Use Element are
also included. These values can be used in planning and design applications as described
below. Exceptions may be approved by the "Regulating Agency" when submitted with a
detailed study.
Table 3-2
MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH (LM)
& INITIAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION (Ti)
Element* DU/ .5% 1% 2% 3% 5% 10%
Acre LM Ti LM Ti LM Ti LM Ti LM Ti LM Ti
Natural 50 13.2 70 12.5 85 10.9 100 10.3 100 8.7 100 6.9
LDR 1 50 12.2 70 11.5 85 10.0 100 9.5 100 8.0 100 6.4
LDR 2 50 11.3 70 10.5 85 9.2 100 8.8 100 7.4 100 5.8
LDR 2.9 50 10.7 70 10.0 85 8.8 95 8.1 100 7.0 100 5.6
MDR 4.3 50 10.2 70 9.6 80 8.1 95 7.8 100 6.7 100 5.3
MDR 7.3 50 9.2 65 8.4 80 7.4 95 7.0 100 6.0 100 4.8
MDR 10.9 50 8.7 65 7.9 80 6.9 90 6.4 100 5.7 100 4.5
MDR 14.5 50 8.2 65 7.4 80 6.5 90 6.0 100 5.4 100 4.3
HDR 24 50 6.7 65 6.1 75 5.1 90 4.9 95 4.3 100 3.5
HDR 43 50 5.3 65 4.7 75 4.0 85 3.8 95 3.4 100 2.7
N.Com 50 5.3 60 4.5 75 4.0 85 3.8 95 3.4 100 2.7
G. Com 50 4.7 60 4.1 75 3.6 85 3.4 90 2.9 100 2.4
O.P./Com 50 4.2 60 3.7 70 3.1 80 2.9 90 2.6 100 2.2
Limited I. 50 4.2 60 3.7 70 3.1 80 2.9 90 2.6 100 2.2
General I. 50 3.7 60 3.2 70 2.7 80 2.6 90 2.3 100 1.9
*See Table 3-1 for more detailed description
3-12
33° 9'1"N
33° 8' 56"N
" ~ Hydrologic Soil Group-San Diego County Area, California
l<l
9
Map Scale: 1:1,070 if printed on A landscape (ll"x 8.5") sheet.
N --------~======--------------~==============~Mete~ 0 15 30 60 90
A ------~=======-------------.c==============F~ 0 50 100 200 300
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinatEs: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone llN WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey ~ Conservation Service
" ~ l<l
9
33° 9' 1" N
~ g
"' "' r<l
0 ~ G3 "' r<l
R en " "' "' r<l
[R en
G3 "' r<l
~ en " "' "' r<l
~ en " ~ r<l
&3 G3 "' r<l
1;3
" ~ 33° 8'56"N r<l
7/20/2015
Page 1 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group-San Diego County Area, California
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Rating Polygons
A
GW AID
gs
lill@l1 BID
D c
CID
D
0 Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines
-A
:#=':.'l(P AID
,....,. B
.-.; BID
'f£·.:,.,:~· c ..,., CID -D
~;: ~ Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Points
!ill A
!ill AID
m s
II BID
USDA Natural Resources =a Conservation Service
c c
!ill CID
1!!11 D
[] Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
H4 Rails
-' Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
• Aerial Photography
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1 :24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area:
Survey Area Data:
San Diego County Area, California
Version 8, Sep 17, 2014
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 3, 2014-Nov 22,
2014
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
7/20/2015
Page 2 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group-San Diego County Area, California
Hydrologic Soil Group
I MIG Marina loamy coarse B 100.0% I
'[ sand, 2 to 9 percent I I
I slopes
I Totals for Area of Interest ----· --------~-------a:st-WO.O%
~--·---·----·-·-·-.-. ----------_______ j
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation
from long-duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (AID, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly
wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly o'f moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils
have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer
at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material.
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (AID, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their
natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
USDA Natural Resources
'&iii Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
7/20/2015
Page 3 of4
Hydrologic Soil Group-San Diego County Area, California
Tie-break Rule: Higher
USDA Natural Resources
'iiiiii Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
7/20/2015
Page 4 of4
L~
r-l
L~
L_j
~
L-''
l~ _j
u
LEGEND
--- ---PROPERTY LIN[ / BASIN BOUNDARY
[XISnNG CONTOUR LIN[
---· EXISTING FLOWLINE
[X/STING DIR[CnON OF FLOW
GRAPHIC SCALE 1''=10'
10 0 10 20 30
'--TG:.-.f<2.9Q
n;~:1~~
-+ ·-· ·' \ . .
i'3<-f,3.<!8 .
l!J
. ;c,::.;:A!l
i
~ ~
~--rs.:.e3.:!2
PRE-DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY
·. :;:csc·ffi'.JG
' T~;;S/..CJS
,:y
·--G3-'-fo334
'_;;s .. ~34r
I
.,.. ~ -r;:>~S.<~
\
3806 GARFIELD STREET
.HEMLocK AVENUE
----'-
-~
%
AFN< 1204-270-04-00
;C'-':iSA1
"<f;
:::-s·~~? . .-:i F~~f.!S.o::i
~ ~-5>
·y·
~cc---=~ ·.
! ~~-;c_::--.. ~~~ .:: :;:':j
/( ___::>;" I~ n oil
I : p
~'/ : 1:>
>3~}«~.11:2'
'i:$>0$_;;<!
"" "'
ilb &~,'·
il(
.~
('
'" !:'l
·r;::.-~~.:;o
"J! ·~~~)~:_i~~-~l::.I.:~r~ -·
GS<V3.:12' , "'""" If,
~ ... ~ '-
G~e:t4!5 • GS.>.f:>Z.il4 GS·-"3.!.75 ·· ·.w \3;J·.·f<:3./~ t !,!
AFl'i· /.04-?.70-G'J-Ci
PRE-DEVELOPMENT NODE MAP
I"~Jo'
I
I
I
I
"-f::..-"5[:.3e
~s.,. ... :;e_;;o
-·:-c.,.~.;.~s
AREA CALCULATIONS
ONS/T£ IMPERVIOUS AREA
ONS/T£ PERVIOUS AREA
% ONS/T£ IMPERVIOUS AREA
1'3-"~S.S1
1,594 SF
4,725 SF
25.2%
Ai='N' 20--:t-:?:;;0-05-C.!{..'
[PASCO LARET SUITER
-----& ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERING+ LAND PLANNING+ LAND SURVEYING
535 North Highway 101, Ste A, Solana Beach, CA 92075
pb 858.259.8212 I &: 858.259.4812 I plaaengineerlng.com
~
i._ j
~
u
,-,
LEGEND
--- ---PROPERTY LINE / BASIN BOUNDARY
EXISTING CONTOUR LINE
---· PROPOSED FLOWLINE
PROPOSED DIRECTION OF FlOW
• ---• RETAINING WALL
10
0 PROPOSED AREA DRAIN
0
PROPOSED PRIVATE STORM DRAIN
PROPOSED fflENCH DRAIN
GRAPHIC SCALE 1"~10·
10 20 30
[ , ~-
POST -DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY AREA CALCULATIONS
·, rc---e.2.>!:> l-·
+ •s .. ~::?;!f.
''" '~
•.
lC"'ii$.4!1
I
~ ~
""1
::-s·.·ii2.<:::
-;-c---~.<'2-·,<
¢
f?'
,.y
, T{;~;u;~
NOD£ 200.1
FG~6U
c.:c~~n4!:i
3806 GARFIELD STREET
\HEMLOCk AVENUE -------"-
;'!:,' ·t~ NODE 200.2
TG=60.2 \ % 1£~59.2
;c,.,:;e.41
--1
r-;;-o-~!$. :3
·-~----\0-
'f: -, . __ ;;_~t;:!-NOD£ 200.'!), (FL~59.1)
::;:.-.(;9'1~
-YC-'f>5.::C.'l
ONSITE IMPERVIOUS AREA
ONSITE PERVIOUS AREA
% ONSITE IMPERVIOUS AREA
::;,.,.~:H:~
3,772 SF
2,547 SF
59.7%
: ........ :..-.:.._~::.::.l_,:,:, ~~~~--------~----------
/ >3S.,5$.il:?
HOUSEIJ2
,_;:::;,~_;;2
OS:.:S?'.~:
(\:!:><SOli::..........--
!;;$"':>?:if·
·GS·-·53./3
A;"'N-204-270-03-01
1"~10'
y ...
~s~;;e.:;o ; -~
-F:O.'-''SI:l.Q:S'·
ill..•
fit,' ''""'"'' ilf'
~ ..
"-f-S·"-''¥.:.3e
.::.PN-.h.J-i--270-o~:-oo
PASCO LARET SUITER I & ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING + LANO PLANNING + LAND SURVEYING
535 North Highway 101, Ste A, Solana Beach, CA 92075
pb 858.259.8212 I fx 858.259.4812 I plsaengineerlng.com
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATION
Rincon Residential Project
3806 Garfield Street
Carlsbad, California
JOB NO. 15-10691
12 March 2015
Prepared for:
Mr. Kevin Dunn
Rincon Real Estate Group, Inc.
AUG 0 3 2015
fr.-feii Geotechnical Exploration, Inc.
SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • GROUNDWATER e ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
12 March 2015
Mr. Kevin Dunn
RINCON REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC.
1520 N. El Camino Real1 Unit 5
San Clemente1 CA 92672
Job No. 15-10691
Subject: Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
Rincon Residential Project
3806 Garfield Street
Carlsbad/ California
Dear Mr. Dunn:
In accordance with your request and our proposal dated February 21 20151
Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. has performed an investigation of the
geotechnical and general geologic conditions at the subject site. The field work was
performed on February 11, 2015.
In our opinion, if the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are
implemented during site preparation, the site will be suited for the proposed
residential project consisting of two, two-story residential structures with attached
garages and associated improvements.
This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Should you have any
questions concerning the following report, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Reference to our Job No. 15-10691 will expedite a response to your inquiries.
Respectfully submitted,
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC.
L ie D. Reed, resident
C.E.G. 999/P.G. 3391
7420 TRADE STREET• SAN DIEGO, CA. 92121 e (858) 549-7222 e FAX: (858) 549-1604 e EMAIL: geotech@gei-sd.com
l ___ i
_j
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROJECT SUMMARY
II. SCOPE OF WORK
III. SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGIC FINDINGS
IV. SITE DESCRIPTION
v. FIELD INVESTIGATION
VI. LABORATORY TESTS AND SOIL INFORMATION
VII. SOIL & GENERAL GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
VIII. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
IX. GROUNDWATER
X. RECOMMENDATIONS
XI. GRADING NOTES
XII. LIMITATIONS
FIGURES
I.
II.
Ilia-e.
IV.
v.
VI.
Vicinity Map
Site Plan
Exploratory Handpit Logs
Laboratory Soil Test Results
Geology Map and Legend
Retaining Wall Drainage Schematic
APPENDICES
A.
B.
c.
D.
Unified Soil Classification System
Seismic Data -EQ Fault Table
Modified Mercalli Index
USGS Design Maps Summary Report
PAGE
1
1
2
3
4
4
6
8
16
17
37
37
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Rincon Residential Project
3806 Garfield Street
Carlsbad, California
JOB NO. 15-10691
The following report presents the findings and recommendations of Geotechnical
Exploration, Inc. for the subject project.
L PROJECTSUMMARY
It is our understanding, based on conversations with the property owner, Mr. Kevin
Dunn of Rincon Real Estate Group and review of a conceptual site plan prepared by
Shackelton Design Group, that the existing residence, detached garage and
improvements are to be removed, and the property is being developed to receive
two 2-story residential structures with attached garages, driveways, and associated
improvements. The new structures are to be constructed of standard-type building
materials utilizing conventional foundations with concrete slab on-grade floors.
Final construction plans for development have not been provided to us during the
preparation of this report, however, when completed they should be made available
for our review.
II. SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work performed for this investigation included a review of available
published information pertaining to the site geology, a site geologic reconnaissance
and subsurface exploration program, laboratory testing, geotechnical engineering
analysis of the research, field and laboratory data, and the preparation of this
report. The data obtained and the analyses performed were for the purpose of
4~jl.
~ '
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 2
providing geotechnical design and construction criteria and recommendations for
the project earthwork, building foundations, and slab on-grade floors.
III. SUMMARY OF GEOTECHNICAL & GEOLOGIC FINDINGS
Our subsurface geotechnical investigation revealed that the lot is underlain at
relatively shallow depth by medium dense, silty sand of the Quaternary-age Old
Paralic Deposits (Qop6_7) overlain by approximately 1 to 3 feet of variable density
weathered terrace materials and minor wall backfill soils. In their present
condition, the surficial soils (fill soils and weathered natural soils) will not provide a
stable base for the proposed residences and associated improvements. As such, we
recommend that, after demolition of existing structures and debris removal, the
upper 3 feet be removed and recompacted as part of site preparation prior to the
addition of any new fill or structural improvements. The formational terrace
materials have good bearing strength characteristics, are of low expansion
potential, and are suitable for support of the proposed recompacted fill soil and
structural loads.
In our opinion, the site is suited for the proposed residential construction provided
our recommendations are implemented during site development. No geologic
hazards exist on or near the site that would prohibit the construction of the new
_j residential improvements. Conventional construction techniques and materials can
be utilized. Detailed construction plans have not been provided to us for the
preparation of this report, however, when completed they should be made available
for our review for new or modified recommendations.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
IV. SITE DESCRIPTION
Job No. 15-10691
Page 3
The property is known as Assessor's Parcel No. 204-270-04-00, Lot 1 in Block "M"
of the Palisades, according to Recorded Map 174 7, in the City of Carlsbad, County
of San Diego, State of California. For the location of the site, refer to the Vicinity
Map, Figure No. I. For purposes of this report, the front of the property is
considered to face west.
The rectangular-shaped site, consisting of approximately 6,300 square feet, is
located at 3806 Garfield Street. The property consists of a two relatively level
building pads separated by a short masonry retaining wall constructed on a gentle
easterly-sloping lot. The western upper pad is at an approximate elevation of 64
feet (residence pad) and the lower, eastern pad is at an approximate elevation of
61 feet (detached garage pad) above Mean Sea Level (MSL). Elevations across the
lot range from a high of 65 feet MSL along the west property line to a low of 59 feet
MSL along the eastern property line. Information concerning approximate site
elevations was obtained from a topographic survey map prepared by Pasco Laret
Suiter, dated February 23, 2015.
The property is a corner lot bordered on the north by the easterly descending
Hemlock Avenue; on the south by a similar easterly sloping residential property at
the approximate same elevations; on the west by Garfield Street; and on the east
by a similar residential property at a slightly lower elevation (for Site Plan, refer to
Figure No. II).
Existing structures include a single-story, single-family residence with a detached
garage, a concrete driveway, concrete walkways and a concrete patio area, short
masonry retaining walls, and associated improvements. Vegetation consists
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 4
primarily of ornamental landscaping including mature trees, decorative shrubbery
and some lawn grass.
V. FIELD INVESTIGATION
A. Exploratory Excavations
Five exploratory excavations were placed on the site in areas near where the
proposed residential structures and improvements are to be located and where
access and soil conditions allowed (for exploratory handpit locations, refer to Figure
No. II). The handpits were excavated to depths ranging to 6 feet in order to obtain
representative soil samples and to define a soil profile across the lot.
The soils encountered in the exploratory handpits were observed and logged by our
field representative and samples were taken of the predominant soils. Excavation
logs have been prepared on the basis of our observations and laboratory testing.
The results have been summarized on Figure Nos. III and IV. The predominant
soils have been classified in general conformance with the Unified Soil Classification
System (refer to Appendix A).
VI. LABORATORY TESTS AND SOIL INFORMATION
Laboratory tests were performed on retrieved soil samples in order to evaluate their
physical and mechanical properties and their ability to support the proposed
residential structures and improvements. Test results are presented on Figure Nos.
III and IV. The following tests were conducted on the sampled soils:
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
1. Moisture Content (ASTM D2216-10)
Job No. 15-10691
Page 5
2. Standard Test Method for Density of Soil In-place by the Drive-
Cylinder Method (ASTM D2937-10)
3. Laboratory Compaction Characteristics (ASTM D1557-09)
4. Determination of Percentage of Particles Smaller than #200 Sieve
(ASTM D1140-06)
Moisture content measurements were performed to establish the in situ moisture of
samples retrieved from the exploratory excavations. Moisture content and density
measurements were performed by ASTM methods D2216 and D2937. These
density tests help to establish the in situ moisture and density of samples retrieved
from the exploratory excavations.
Laboratory compaction values (ASTM D1557) establish the Optimum Moisture
content and the laboratory Maximum Dry Density of the tested soils. The
relationship between the moisture and density of remolded soil samples gives
qualitative information regarding existing fill conditions and soil compaction
conditions to be anticipated during any future grading operation.
The passing -200 sieve size analysis (ASTM D1140) aids in classification of the
tested soils based on their fine material content and provides qualitative
information related to engineering characteristics such as expansion potential,
permeability, and shear strength.
The expansion potential of soils is determined, when necessary, utilizing the
Standard Test Method for Expansion Index of Soils (ASTM D4829). In accordance
with the Standard (Table 5.3), potentially expansive soils are classified as follows:
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
EXPANSION INDEX
0 to 20
21 to .50
51 to 90
91 to 130
Above 130
Job No. 15-10691
Page 6
POTENTIAL EXPANSION
Very low
Low
Medium
Hiqh
Very high
Based on our particle-size test results, our visual classification, and our experience
with similar soils, it is our opinion that the majority of the on-site silty sand
formational terrace materials have a very low expansion potential (EI less than 20).
Based on the laboratory test data, our observations of the primary soil types, and
our previous experience with laboratory testing of similar soils, our Geotechnical
Engineer has assigned values for friction angle, coefficient of friction, and cohesion
for those soils which will have significant lateral support or load bearing functions
on the project. These values have been utilized in determining the recommended
bearing value as well as active and passive earth pressure design criteria.
VII. SOIL AND GENERAL GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
A. Stratigraphy
Our investigation and review of pertinent geologic maps and reports indicate that
formational terrace silty sands identified as Quaternary-age Old Paralic Deposits
(QOPG-7) underlie the entire site. The encountered soil profile includes minor wall
backfill soils/fill soils overlying the formational terrace soils.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Wall Backfill/Fill Soils (Qaf):
Job No. 15-10691
Page 7
Wall backfill soils were encountered in the central
portion of the lot adjacent to the north-south retaining wall that separates the
upper pad from the lower pad at the location of excavation HP-3. Minor fill soils
were also encountered along the eastern edge of the lot at the location of
excavation HP-5. The backfill/fill soils consist of red-brown, silty, fine-to medium-
grained sand with some roots. These soils are generally of variable density, damp,
and of very low expansion potential. They are not suitable in their current condition
for support of loads from structures or additional fill. Refer to Figure Nos. III and
IV for details.
Old Paralic Deposits (Qop~ Old Paralic Deposits formational terrace materials
were encountered at shallow depths at all excavation locations and consist of
generally loose to medium dense, red-brown to light red-tan-brown, silty, fine-to
medium-grained sand. The formational terrace soils are of very low expansion
potential and have good bearing strength characteristics. The terrace materials are
underlain at depth by the Eocene Santiago Formation. The upper 3 feet of the
terrace soils are in a relatively loose weathered condition and are not suitable in
their current condition for support of loads from structures or additional fill. Refer
to Figure Nos. III and IV for details.
B. Structure
Quaternary-age Old Paralic Deposits underlie the entire site at shallow depth and
are underlain at depth by the Eocene-age Santiago Formation (Tsa). The Old
Paralic Deposits are relatively flat-lying as depicted on the geologic map (Kennedy
and Tan, 2008; Figure No. V). Although not encountered in our shallow
excavations, the Santiago Formation strikes approximately east-west and dips 8 to
10 degrees to the north-northeast as depicted on the geologic map. No faults are
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
indicated on or nearby the site on the geologic map.
relatively flat topography presents no adverse soil
property.
Job No. 15-10691
Page 8
The geologic structure and
stability conditions for the
VIIL GEOLOGICHAZARDS
The following is a discussion of the geologic conditions and hazards common to the
Encinitas area, as well as project-specific geologic information relating to
development of the subject property.
A. Local and Regional Faults
Reference to the geologic map of the area, Figure No. V (Kennedy and Tan, 2008),
indicates that no faults are mapped on the site. In our explicit professional opinion,
neither an active fault nor a potentially active fault underlies the site.
Rose Canyon Fault: The Rose Canyon Fault Zone (Mount Soledad and Rose Canyon
Faults) is mapped approximately 4.7 miles west of the subject site. The Rose
Canyon Fault is mapped trending north-south from Oceanside to downtown San
Diego, from where it appears to head southward into San Diego Bay, through
Coronado and offshore. The Rose Canyon Fault Zone is considered to be a complex
zone of onshore and offshore, en echelon strike slip, oblique reverse, and oblique
normal faults. The Rose Canyon Fault is considered to be capable of generating an
M7.2 earthquake and is considered microseismically active, although no significant
recent earthquakes are known to have occurred on the fault.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 9
Investigative work on faults that are part of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone at the
Police Administration and Technical Center in downtown San Diego, at the SDG&E
facility in Rose Canyon, and within San Diego Bay and elsewhere within downtown
San Diego, has encountered offsets in Holocene (geologically recent) sediments.
These findings confirm Holocene displacement on the Rose Canyon Fault, which was
designated an "active" fault in November 1991 (Hart E.W. and W.A. Bryant, 2007,
Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, California Geological Survey Special
Publication 42).
In a report compiled by Rockwell et al. (2012) for Southern California Edison, it is
suggested that the recurrence interval for earthquakes on the RCFZ is in the range
of 400 to 500 years, with the most recent earthquake (MRE) nearly 500 years ago.
The report indicates the slip rate on the RCFZ is not well constrained but a
compilation of the latest research implies a long-term slip rate of approximately 2
mm/year.
Newport-Inglewood Fault: The offshore portion of the Newport-Inglewood Fault
Zone is located approximately 5.2 miles west and northwest of the site. A
significant earthquake (M6.4) occurred along this fault on March 10, 1933. Since
then no additional significant events have occurred. The fault is believed to have a
slip rate of approximately 0.6-mm/yr with an unknown recurrence interval. This
fault is believed capable of producing an earthquake of M6.0 to M7.4 (SCEC, 2004).
Coronado Bank Fault: The Coronado Bank Fault is located approximately 20.6
miles southwest of the site. Evidence for this fault is based upon geophysical data
(acoustic profiles) and the general alignment of epicenters of recorded seismic
activity (Greene, 1979). The Oceanside earthquake of M5.3 recorded July 13,
1986, is known to have been centered on the fault or within the Coronado Bank
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 10
Fault Zone. Although this fault is considered active, due to the seismicity within the
fault zone, it is significantly less active seismically than the Elsinore Fault (Hileman,
1973). It is postulated that the Coronado Bank Fault is capable of generating a
M7.6 earthquake and ~s of great interest due to its close proximity to the greater
San Diego metropolitan area.
Elsinore Fault: The Elsinore Fault is located approximately 25 to 59 miles east and
northeast of the site. The fault extends approximately 200 km (125 miles) from
the Mexican border to the northern end of the Santa Ana Mountains. The Elsinore
Fault zone is a 1-to 4-mile-wide, northwest-southeast-trending zone of
discontinuous and en echelon faults extending through portions of Orange,
Riverside, San Diego, and Imperial Counties. Individual faults within the Elsinore
Fault Zone range from less than 1 mile to 16 miles in length. The trend, length and
geomorphic expression of the Elsinore Fault Zone identify it as being a part of the
highly active San Andreas Fault system.
Like the other faults in the San Andreas system, the Elsinore Fault is a transverse
fault showing predominantly right-lateral movement. According to Hart, et al.
(1979), this movement averages less than 1 centimeter per year. Along most of its
length, the Elsinore Fault Zone is marked by a bold topographic expression
consisting of linearly aligned ridges, swales and hallows. Faulted Holocene alluvial
deposits (believed to be less than 11,000 years old) found along several segments
of the fault zone suggest that at least part of the zone is currently active.
Although the Elsinore Fault Zone belongs to the San Andreas set of active,
_j northwest-trending, right-slip faults in the southern California area (Crowell, 1962),
it has not been the site of a major earthquake in historic time, other than a M6.0
earthquake near the town of Elsinore in 1910 (Richter, 1958; Toppozada and Parke,
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 11
1982). However, based on length and evidence of late-Pleistocene or Holocene
displacement, Greensfelder (1974) has estimated that the Elsinore Fault Zone is
reasonably capable of generating an earthquake with a magnitude as large as M7.5.
Study and logging of exposures in trenches placed in Glen Ivy Marsh across the
Glen Ivy North Fault (a strand of the Elsinore Fault Zone between Corona and Lake
Elsinore), suggest a maximum earthquake recurrence interval of 300 years, and
when combined with previous estimates of the long-term horizontal slip rate of 0.8
to 7.0 mm/year, suggest typical earthquake magnitudes of M6.0 to M7.0 (Rockwell,
1985). More recently, the California Geologic Survey (2002) considers the Elsinore
Fault capable of producing an earthquake of M6.8 to M7.1.
San Jacinto Fault: The San Jacinto Fault is located approximately 47 to 60 miles to
the northeast of the site. The San Jacinto Fault Zone consists of a series of closely
spaced faults, including the Coyote Creek Fault, that form the western margin of
the San Jacinto Mountains. The fault zone extends from its junction with the San
Andreas Fault in San Bernardino, southeasterly toward the Brawley area, where it
continues south of the international border as the Imperial Transform Fault (Earth
Consultants International [ECI], 2009).
The San Jacinto Fault zone has a high level of historical seismic activity, with at
least 10 damaging earthquakes (M6.0 to M7.0) having occurred on this fault zone
between 1890 and 1986. Earthquakes on the San Jacinto Fault in 1899 and 1918
caused fatalities in the Riverside County area. Offset across this fault is
predominantly right-lateral, similar to the San Andreas Fault, although some
investigators have suggested that dip-slip motion contributes up to 10% of the net
slip (ECI, 2009).
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 12
The segments of the San Jacinto Fault that are of most concern to major
metropolitan areas are the San Bernardino, San Jacinto Valley and Anza segments.
Fault slip rates on the various segments of the San Jacinto are less well constrained
than for the San Andreas Fault, but the available data suggest slip rates of 12 ±6
mm/yr for the northern segments of the fault, and slip rates of 4 ±2 mm/yr for the
southern segments. For large ground-rupturing earthquakes on the San Jacinto
fault, various investigators have suggested a recurrence interval of 150 to 300
years. The Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP, 2008)
has estimated that there is a 31 percent probability that an earthquake of M6. 7 or
greater will occur within 30 years on this fault. Maximum credible earthquakes of
M6.7, M6.9 and M7.2 are expected on the San Bernardino, San Jacinto Valley and
Anza segments, respectively, capable of generating peak horizontal ground
accelerations of 0.48g to 0.53g in the County of Riverside, (ECI, 2009). A M5.4
earthquake occurred on the San Jacinto Fault on July 7, 2010.
The United States Geological Survey has issued the following statements with
respect to the recent seismic activity on southern California faults:
The San Jacinto fault, along with the Elsinore, San Andreas, and other
faults, is part of the plate boundary that accommodates about 2
inches/year of motion as the Pacific plate moves northwest relative to
the North American plate. The largest recent earthquake on the San
Jacinto fault, near this location, the M6.5 1968 Borrego Mountain
earthquake April 8, 1968, occurred about 25 miles southeast of the
July 7, 2010, M5.4 earthquake.
This M5.4 earthquake follows the 4th of April 2010, Easter Sunday,
M7.2 earthquake, located about 125 miles to the south, well south of
the US Mexico international border. A M4.9 earthquake occurred in
the same area on June 12th at 8:08 pm (Pacific Time). Thus this
section of the San Jacinto fault remains active.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 13
Seismologists are watching two major earthquake faults in southern
California. The San Jacinto fault, the most active earthquake fault in
southern California, extends for more than 100 miles from the
international border into San Bernardino and Riverside, a major
metropolitan area often called the Inland Empire. The Elsinore fault is
more than 110 miles long, and extends into the Orange County and
Los Angeles area as the Whittier fault. The Elsinore fault is capable of
a major earthquake that would significantly affect the large
metropolitan areas of southern California. The Elsinore fault has not
hosted a major earthquake in more than 100 years. The occurrence of
these earthquakes along the San Jacinto fault and continued
aftershocks demonstrates that the earthquake activity in the region
remains at an elevated level. The San Jacinto fault is known as the
most active earthquake fault in southern California. Caltech and USGS
seismologist continue to monitor the ongoing earthquake activity using
the Caltech/USGS Southern California Seismic Network and a GPS
network of more than 100 stations.
B. Other Geologic Hazards
Ground Rupture: Ground rupture is characterized by bedrock slippage along an
established fault and may result in displacement of the ground surface. For ground
rupture to occur along a fault, an earthquake usually exceeds MS.O. If a MS.O
earthquake were to take place on a local fault, an estimated surface-rupture length
1 mile long could be expected (Greensfelder, 1974). Our investigation indicates
that the subject site is not directly on a known active fault trace and, therefore, the
risk of ground rupture is remote.
Ground Shaking: Structural damage caused by seismically induced ground shaking
is a detrimental effect directly related to faulting and earthquake activity. Ground
shaking is considered to be the greatest seismic hazard in San Diego County. The
intensity of ground shaking is dependent on the magnitude of the earthquake, the
distance from the earthquake, and the seismic response characteristics of
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 14
underlying soils and geologic units. Earthquakes of M5.0 or greater are generally
associated with significant damage. It is our opinion that the most serious damage
to the site would be caused by a large earthquake originating on a nearby strand of
the Rose Canyon or Newport-Inglewood Faults. Although the chance of such an
event is remote, it coulld occur within the useful life of the structure.
Landslides: Based upon our geotechnical investigation and review of the geologic
map (Kennedy and Tan, 2005 and 2008), there are no known or suspected ancient
landslides located on the site.
Liquefaction: The liquefaction of saturated sands during earthquakes can be a
major cause of damage to buildings. Liquefaction is the process by which soils are
transformed into a viscous fluid that will flow as a liquid when unconfined. It occurs
primarily in loose, saturated sands and silts when they are sufficiently shaken by an
earthquake.
On this site, the risk of liquefaction of foundation materials due to seismic shaking
is also considered to be remote due to the medium dense nature of the natural-
ground material, the anticipated high density of the proposed recompacted fill, and
the lack of a shallow static groundwater surface under the site. No soil liquefaction
or soil strength loss is anticipated to occur due to a seismic event.
Tsunami: A tsunami is a series of long waves generated in the ocean by a sudden
displacement of a large volume of water. Underwater earthquakes, landslides,
volcanic eruptions, meteoric impacts, or onshore slope failures can cause this
displacement. Tsunami waves can travel at speeds averaging 450 to 600 miles per
hour. As a tsunami nears the coastline, its speed diminishes, its wave length
decreases, and its hei9ht increases greatly. After a major earthquake or other
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 15
tsunami-inducing activity occurs, a tsunami could reach the shore within a few
minutes. One coastal community may experience no damaging waves while
another may experience very destructive waves. Some low-lying areas could
experience severe inland inundation of water and deposition of debris more than
3,000 feet inland.
The site is located less than 0.15-mile from the Pacific Ocean strand line at an
elevation of 61 to 70 feet above MSL. It is unlikely that a tsunami would affect the
lot.
Geologic Hazards Summarv: It is our opinion, based upon a review of the available
geologic maps, our research, and our site investigation, that the site is underlain by
relatively stable formational materials (and shallow slopewash and weathered
terrace materials to be recompacted), and is suited for the proposed residential
structures and associated improvements provided the recommendations herein are
implemented. No significant geologic hazards are known to exist on the site that
would prevent the proposed construction. In our professional opinion, no "active"
or "potentially active" faults underlie the project site.
The most significant geologic hazard at the site is anticipated ground shaking from
earthquakes on active Southern California and Baja California faults. The United
States Geologic Survey has issued statements indicating that seismic activity in
Southern California may continue at elevated levels with increased risk to major
metropolitan areas near the Elsinore and San Jacinto faults. These faults are too
far from the subject property to present a seismic risk. To date, the nearest known
"active" faults to the subject site are the northwest-trending Rose Canyon Fault,
Newport-Inglewood Fault and the Coronado Bank Fault.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 16
No significant geologic hazards are known to exist on or near the site that would
prevent the proposed construction.
IX. GROUNDWATER
Groundwater and/or perched water conditions were not encountered at the
explored excavation locations and we do not expect significant groundwater
problems to develop in the future if proper drainage is maintained on the property.
It should be kept in mind that construction operations will change surface drainage
patterns and/or reduce surface permeabilities due to the densification of compacted
soils. Such changes of surface and subsurface hydrologic conditions, plus irrigation
of landscaping or significant increases in rainfall, may result in the appearance of
surface or near-surface water at locations where none existed previously. The
appearance of such water is expected to be localized and cosmetic in nature, if
good positive drainage is implemented, as recommended in this report, during and
at the completion of construction.
Based on our site observations and laboratory testing, it is our opinion that the silty
sand formational terrace soils are relatively permeable and well-suited for the use
of permeable pavers. Shallow perching conditions were not encountered on this lot
and are not characteristic of the sandy soil conditions comprising this area of
Carlsbad.
It must be understood that unless discovered during initial site exploration or
encountered during site grading operations, it is extremely difficult to predict if or
where perched or true groundwater conditions may appear in the future. Water
conditions, where suspected or encountered during grading and/or construction,
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 17
should be evaluated and remedied by the project civil and geotechnical consultants.
The project developer and property owner, however, must realize that post-
construction appearances of groundwater may have to be dealt with on a site-
specific basis.
X. RECOMMENDATIONS
The following recommendations are based upon the practical field investigation
conducted by our firm, and resulting laboratory tests, in conjunction with our
knowledge and experience with similar soils in the Carlsbad area.
The opinions, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report are
contingent upon Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. being retained to review the final
plans and specifications as they are developed and to observe the site earthwork
and installation of foundations. Recommendations presented herein are based on
undated preliminary conceptual plans provided by our client.
A. Seismic Design Criteria
1. Seismic Data Bases: An estimation of the peak ground acceleration and the
repeatable high ground acceleration (RHGA) likely to occur at the project site
is based on the known significant local and regional faults within 100 miles of
the site. In addition, we have reviewed a listing of the known historic
seismic events that have occurred within 100 miles of the site at an MS.O or
greater since the year 1800, and the probability of exceeding the
experienced ground accelerations in the future based upon the historical
record.
_j
- J
___ j
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 18
2.
The RHGA and seismic events within 100 miles are derived from tables
generated from computer programs EQSearch and EQFault by Thomas F.
Blake (2000) utilizing a file listing of recorded earthquakes (EQSearch) and a
digitized file of late-Quaternary California faults (EQFault). The EQSearch
tables are retained in our files for future reference, and we have included the
EQFault Table as Appendix B. Estimations of site intensity are also provided
in these listings as Modified Mercalli Index values. The Modified Mercalli
Intensity Index is provided as Appendix C.
Seismic Design Criteria: The proposed structure should be designed in
accordance with the 2013 CBC, which incorporates by reference the ASCE 7-
10 for seismic design. We recommend the following parameters be utilized.
We have determined the mapped spectral acceleration values for the site
based on a latitude of 33.1497 degrees and longitude of 117.3447 degrees,
utilizing a program titled "U.S. Seismic Design Maps and Tools," provided by
the USGS, which provides a solution for ASCE 7-10 (2013 CBC) utilizing
digitized files for the Spectral Acceleration maps.
In addition, we have assigned a Site Classification of S0 • The response
parameters for design are presented in the following table. The design
Spectral Acceleration (SA) vs. Period (T) is shown on Appendix D.
TABLE I
Mapped Spectral Acceleration Values and Design Parameters
0.691 0.461
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
B. Preparation of Soils for Site Development
Job No. 15-10691
Page 19
3. Clearing and Stripping: The existing structures, improvements, and
vegetation on the site should be removed prior to the preparation of the
building pads and areas of associated improvements. This includes root
systems of the existing trees. Holes resulting from the removal of root
systems or other buried foundations, piping, debris or obstructions that
extend below the planned grades should be cleared and backfilled with
properly compacted fill.
4. Treatment of Existing Loose Fill and Surficial Soils: In order to provide
suitable foundation support for the proposed residential structures and
associated improvements, we recommend that the existing fill soils and loose
surficial soils that remain after the necessary site excavations have been
made be removed and recompacted. The anticipated depth of removal is
approximately 3 feet.
The recompaction work should consist of (a) removing the existing fill soils
and loose surficial soils down to native medium dense to dense formational
terrace materials; (b) scarifying, moisture conditioning, and compacting the
exposed subgrade soils; and (c) replacing the excavated material as
compacted structural fill.
The areal extent and depth required to remove the fill soils and loose surficial
soils should be confirmed by our representatives during the excavation work
based on their examination of the soils being exposed. The lateral extent of
the excavation and recompaction should be at least 5 feet beyond the edge
of the perimeter foundations and any areas to receive exterior improvements
_ _j
J
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 20
or a lateral distance equal to the depth of soil removed at any specific
location, whichever is larger. Any unsuitable materials (such as oversize
rubble or rocks, and/or organic matter) should be selectively removed as
directed by our representative and disposed of off-site.
Any rigid improvements founded on existing loose or soft surface soils can be
expected to undergo movement and possible damage. Geotechnical
Exploration, Inc. takes no responsibility for the performance of any
improvements built on loose natural soils or inadequately compacted fills.
5. Subgrade Preparation: After the site has been cleared, stripped, and the
required excavations made, the exposed subgrade soils in the areas to
receive fill and/or building improvements should be scarified to a depth of 12
inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to the requirements for
structural fill. The near-surface moisture content of fine-grained soils should
be maintained by periodic sprinkling until within 48 hours prior to concrete
placement.
6. Expansive Soil Conditions: We do not anticipate that significant quantities of
medium or highly expansive clay soils will be encountered during grading.
Should such soils be encountered and used as fill, however, they should be
moisture conditioned or dried to no greater than 5 percent above Optimum
Moisture content, compacted to 88 to 92 percent, and placed outside building
areas. Soils of medium or greater expansion potential should not be used as
retaining wall backfill soils.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 21
7. Material for Fill: Existing on-site soils with an organic content of less than 3
percent by volume are, in general, suitable for use as fill. Any required,
imported fill material (such as for retaining wall backfill) should be a low-
expansion potential (Expansion Index of 50 or less per ASTM 04829-11). In
addition, both imported and existing on-site materials for use as fill should
not contain rocks or lumps more than 6 inches in greatest dimension. All
materials for use as fill should be approved by our firm prior to filling.
Retaining wall and trench backfill material should not contain material larger
than 3 inches in greatest dimension.
8. Fill Compaction: All structural fill should be compacted to a minimum degree
of compaction of 90 percent based upon ASTM 01557-09. Fill material
should be spread and compacted in uniform horizontal lifts not exceeding 8
inches in uncompacted thickness. Before compaction begins, the fill should
be brought to a water content that will permit proper compaction by either:
(1) aerating and drying the fill if it is too wet, or (2) moistening the fill with
water if it is too dry. Each lift should be thoroughly mixed before compaction
to ensure a uniform distribution of moisture. For low expansive soils, the
moisture content should be within 2 percent of optimum.
No uncontrolled fill soils should remain after completion of the site work. In
the event that temporary ramps or pads are constructed of uncontrolled fill
soils, the loose fill soils should be removed and/or recompacted prior to
completion of the grading operation.
9. Trench and Retaining Wall Backfill: Utility trenches and retaining walls
should preferably be backfilled with on-site, low-expansive or imported, low-
expansive compacted fill; gravel is also a suitable backfill material but should
___ _j
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 22
be used only if space constraints will not allow the use of compaction
equipment. Gravel can also be used as backfill around perforated subdrains
protected with geofabric. All backfill material should be placed in lift
thicknesses appropriate to the type of compaction equipment utilized and
compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent by mechanical
means.
Our experience has shown that even shallow, narrow trenches (such as for
irrigation and electrical lines) that are not properly compacted, can result in
problems, particularly with respect to shallow groundwater accumulation and
migration.
Backfill soils placed behind retaining walls and/or crawl space retaining walls
should be installed as early as the retaining walls are capable of supporting
lateral loads. Backfill soils behind retaining walls should be low expansive,
with an Expansion Index equal to or lower than 50. All areas backfilled with
gravel should be capped with a minimum 12-inch-thick layer of properly
compacted on-site soils overlying Mirafi 140N filter fabric to reduce the
potential for fines loss into the gravel.
C. Design Parameters for Proposed Foundations
In order to support the proposed structures on conventional continuous concrete
foundations the following recommendations should be followed. Footings should
extend into formational soils or properly compacted fill soils to a depth of 18 inches.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 23
10. Footings: Footings for the new residential structures should bear on
undisturbed formational materials or properly compacted fill soils. The
footings for the proposed structures should be founded at least 18 inches
below the lowest adjacent finished soil grade and have a minimum width of
12 inches. The footings should contain top and bottom reinforcement to
provide structural continuity and to permit spanning of local irregularities.
Footings located adjacent to utility trenches should have their bearing
surfaces situated below an imaginary 1.0:1.0 plane projected upward from
the bottom edge of the adjacent utility trench. Otherwise, the trenches
should be excavated farther from the footing locations.
11. Bearing Values: At the recommended depths, footings on native, medium
dense formational soil or properly compacted fill soil may be designed for an
allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for
combined dead and live loads and may be increased one-third if including
wind or seismic loads. The footings should have a minimum width of 12
inches.
12. Footing Reinforcement: All continuous footings should contain top and
bottom reinforcement to provide structural continuity and to permit spanning
of local irregularities. We recommend that a minimum of two No. 5 top and
two No. 5 bottom reinforcing bars be provided in the footings. A minimum
clearance of 3 inches should be maintained between steel reinforcement and
the bottom or sides of the footing. Isolated square footings should contain,
as a minimum, a grid of three No. 4 steel bars on 12-inch centers, both
ways. In order for us to offer an opinion as to whether the footings are
founded on soils of sufficient load bearing capacity, it is essential that our
,-;
_ _j
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 24
representative inspect the footing excavations prior to the placement of
reinforcing steel or concrete.
NOTE: The project Civil/Structural Engineer should review all reinforcing
schedules. The reinforcing minimums recommended herein are not to be
construed as structural designs, but merely as minimum reinforcement to
reduce the potential for cracking and separations.
13. Lateral Loads: Lateral load resistance for the structure supported on footing
foundations may be developed in friction between the foundation bottoms
and the supporting subgrade. An allowable friction coefficient of 0.40 is
considered applicable. An additional allowable passive resistance equal to an
equivalent fluid weight of 300 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting against the
foundations may be used in design provided the footings are poured neat
against the adjacent undisturbed formational materials and/or properly
compacted fill materials. These lateral resistance values assume a level
surface in front of the footing for a minimum distance of three times the
embedment depth of the footing.
14. Settlement: Settlements under building loads are expected to be within
tolerable limits for the proposed residences. For footings designed in
accordance with the recommendations presented in the preceding
paragraphs, we anticipate that total settlements should not exceed 1 inch
and that post-construction differential angular rotation should be less than
1/240.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
D. Concrete Slab-on-grade Criteria
Job No. 15-10691
Page 25
Slabs on-grade may only be used on new, properly compacted fill or when bearing
on dense natural soils.
15. Minimum Floor Slab Reinforcement: Based on our experience, we have
found that, for various reasons, floor slabs occasionally crack. Therefore, we
recommend that all slabs-on-grade contain at least a minimum amount of
reinforcing steel to reduce the separation of cracks, should they occur.
Interior floor slabs should be a minimum of 4 inches actual thickness and be
reinforced with No. 3 bars on 18-inch centers, both ways, placed at
midheight in the slab. Slab subgrade soil moisture should be verified by a
Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. representative to have the proper moisture
content within 48 hours prior to placement of the vapor barrier and pouring
of concrete. Shrinkage control joints should be placed no farther than 20
feet apart and at re-entrant corners. The joints should penetrate at least 1
inch into the slab.
Following placement of any concrete floor slabs, sufficient drying time must
be allowed prior to placement of floor coverings. Premature placement of
floor coverings may result in degradation of adhesive materials and loosening
of the finish floor materials.
16. Slab Moisture Protection and Vapor Barrier Membrane: Although it is not the
responsibility of geotechnical engineering firms to provide moisture
protection recommendations, as a service to our clients we provide the
following discussion and suggested minimum protection criteria. Actual
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 26
recommendations should be provided by the architect and waterproofing
consultants or product manufacturer.
Soil moisture vapor can result in damage to moisture-sensitive floors, some
floor sealers, or sensitive equipment in direct contact with the floor,. in
addition to mold and staining on slabs, walls, and carpets. The common
practice in Southern California is to place vapor retarders made of PVC, or of
polyethylene. PVC retarders are made in thickness ranging from 10-to 60-
mil. Polyethylene retarders, called visqueen, range from 5-to 10-mil in
thickness. These products are no longer considered adequate for moisture
protection and can actually deteriorate over time.
Specialty vapor retarding products possess higher tensile strength and are
more specifically designed for and intended to retard moisture transmission
into and through concrete slabs. The use of such products is highly
recommended for reduction of floor slab moisture emission.
The following American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and
American Concrete Institute (ACI) sections address the issue of moisture
transmission into and through concrete slabs: ASTM E1745-97 (2009)
Standard Specification for Plastic Water Vapor Retarders Used in Contact
Concrete Slabs; ASTM E154-88 (2005) Standard Test Methods for Water
Vapor Retarders Used in Contact with Earth; ASTM E96-95 Standard Test
Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials; ASTM E1643-98 (2009)
Standard Practice for Installation of Water Vapor Retarders Used in Contact
Under Concrete Slabs; and ACI 302.2R-06 Guide for Concrete Slabs that
Receive Moisture·-Sensitive Flooring Materials.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad/ California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 27
16.1 Based on the above/ we recommend that the vapor barrier consist of a
minimum 15-mil extruded polyolefin plastic (no recycled content or
woven materials permitted). Permeance as tested before and after
mandatory conditioning (ASTM E1745 Section 7.1 and sub-paragraphs
7.1.1-7.1.5) should be less than 0.01 perms (grains/square foot/hour
in Hg) and comply with the ASTM E1745 Class A requirements.
Installation of vapor barriers should be in accordance with ASTM
E1643. The basis of design is 15-mil StegoWrap vapor barrier placed
per the manufacturer's guidelines. Reef Industries Vapor Guard
membrane has also been shown to achieve a permeance of less than
0.01 perms. Our suggested acceptable moisture retardant membranes
are based on a report entitled "Report of Water Vapor Permeation
Testing of Construction Vapor Barrier Materialslf by Dr. Kay Cooksey1
Ph.D.1 Clemson University/ Dept. of Packaging Science/ 2009-10.
The membrane may be placed directly on properly compacted
subgrade soils and directly underneath the slab. Proper slab curing is
required to help prevent slab curling.
16.2 Common to all acceptable products1 vapor retarder/barrier joints must
be lapped and sealed with mastic or the manufacturer's recommended
tape or sealing products. In actual practice, stakes are often driven
through the retarder material/ equipment is dragged or rolled across
the retarder/ overlapping or jointing is not properly implemented/ etc.
All these construction deficiencies reduce the retarder's effectiveness.
In no case should retarder/barrier products be punctured or gaps be
allowed to form prior to or during concrete placement.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 28
16.3 As previously stated, following placement of concrete floor slabs,
sufficient drying time must be allowed prior to placement of any floor
coverings. Premature placement of floor coverings may result in
degradation of adhesive materials and loosening of the finish floor
materials.
17. Concrete Isolation Joints: We recommend the project Civil/Structural
Engineer incorporate isolation joints and control joints (sawcuts) to at least
one-fourth the thickness of the slab in any floor designs. The joints and cuts,
if properly placed, should reduce the potential for and help control floor slab
cracking. We recommend that concrete shrinkage joints be spaced no
farther than approximately 20 feet apart, and also at re-entrant corners.
However, due to a number of reasons (such as base preparation,
construction techniques, curing procedures, and normal shrinkage of
concrete), some cracking of slabs can be expected.
18. Exterior Slab Reinforcement: Exterior concrete slabs should be at least 4
inches thick. As a minimum for protection of on-site improvements, we
recommend that all nonstructural concrete slabs (such as patios, sidewalks,
etc.), be founded on properly compacted and tested fill or dense native
formation and be underlain by 2 inches (and no more than 3 inches) of
compacted clean leveling sand, with No. 3 bars at 18-inch centers, both
ways, at the center of the slab. Exterior slabs should contain adequate
isolation and control joints as noted in the following paragraphs.
The performance of on-site improvements can be greatly affected by soil
base preparation and the quality of construction. It is therefore important
that all improvements are properly designed and constructed for the existing
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 29
soil conditions. The improvements should not be built on loose soils or fills
placed without our observation and testing. The subgrade of exterior
improvements should be verified as properly prepared within 48 hours prior
to concrete placement. A minimum thickness of 2 feet of properly
recompacted soils should underlie exterior slabs on-grade for secondary
improvements.
19. Exterior Slab Control Joints: For exterior slabs with the minimum shrinkage
reinforcement, control joints should be placed at spaces no farther than 12
feet apart or the width of the slab, whichever is less, and also at re-entrant
corners. Control joints in exterior slabs should be sealed with elastomeric
joint sealant. The sealant should be inspected every 6 months and be
properly maintained. Concrete slab joints should be dowelled or continuous
steel reinforcement should be provided to help reduce any potential
differential movement.
20. Concrete Pavement: New concrete driveway and parking slabs should be at
least 51f2 inches thick and rest on properly prepared and compacted subgrade
soils. Subgrade soil for driveway and parking areas should be dense or, if
fill, be compacted to at least 95 percent of Maximum Dry Density. The
driveway and parking slabs should be provided with reinforcing consisting of
No. 4 bars spaced no farther than 15 inches apart in two perpendicular
directions. The concrete should be at least 3,500 psi compressive strength,
with control joints no farther than 12 feet apart and also at re-entrant
corners. Pavement joints should be properly sealed with permanent joint
sealant, as required in· sections 201.3.6 through 201.3.8 of the Standard
Specifications for Public Work Construction, 2012 Edition.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 30
Control joints should be placed within 12 hours after concrete placement or
as soon as the concrete allows sawcutting without aggregate raveling. The
sawcuts should penetrate at least one-quarter the thickness of the slab.
21. Permeable Driveway Pavers: If permeable pavers are considered, it is our
opinion based on our site observations and laboratory testing, that the on-
site silty sand fill soils and underlying medium dense silty sand formational
soils are well-suited for the use of permeable pavers.
It is recommended that a minimum 6-inch thick base layer of crushed
miscellaneous rock material, compacted to at least 95 percent relative
compaction, be placed below a l-inch thick leveling sand layer under the
pavers. The subgrade soils supporting the base layer should also be
compacted to 95 percent relative compaction.
E. S/ooes
It is our understanding that no permanent slopes are proposed at this time. Should
portions of the site be modified to include new slopes, our office should be
contacted for additional recommendations.
22. Temporary Slopes: Temporary slopes needed for retaining wall construction
and/or removal and recompaction during site grading should be stable for a
maximum slope ratio of 0.75:1.0 (horizontal to vertical) to a maximum
height of 12 feet. No soil stockpiles, improvements or other surcharges may
exist or be placed within a horizontal distance of 10 feet from the excavation.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 31
The stability of temporary construction slopes will depend largely on the
contractor's activities and safety precautions (storage and equipment
loadings near the tops of cut slopes, surface drainage provisions, etc.), it
should be the contractor's responsibility to establish and maintain all
temporary construction slopes at a safe inclination appropriate to his
methods of operation.
If these recommendations are not feasible due to space constraints,
temporary shoring may be required for safety and to protect adjacent
property improvements. This office should be contacted for additional
recommendations if shoring or steep temporary slopes are required.
23. Cal-OSHA: Where not superseded by specific recommendations presented in
this report, trenches, excavations, and temporary slopes at the subject site
should be constructed in accordance with Title 8, Construction Safety Orders,
issued by Cal-OSHA.
F. Retaining Wall Design Criteria
It is our understanding that no retaining walls are currently proposed. The
following retaining wall design criteria are provided based on the encountered soil
conditions.
24. Static Design Parameters: Retaining walls must be designed to resist lateral
earth pressures and any additional lateral pressures caused by surcharge
loads on the adjoining retained surface. We recommend that restrained
retaining walls with level backfill be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure
of 56 pcf for low expansive import or on-site soils. Wherever restrained walls
Rincon Residential Proj•=ct
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 32
will be subjected to surcharge loads, they should also be designed for an
additional uniform lateral pressure equal to 0.47 times the anticipated
surcharge pressure.
Backfill placed behind the walls should be compacted to a minimum degree of
compaction of 90 percent using light compaction equipment. If heavy
equipment is used, the walls should be appropriately temporarily braced.
25. Seismic Earth Pressures: If seismic loading is to be considered for retaining
walls more than 6 feet in height, they should be designed for seismic earth
pressures in addition to the normal static pressures. The soil seismic
increment is an equivalent fluid weight of 14 pcf. A Kh value of 0.18 may be
used is a computer program such as "Retaining Wall Pro" or a similar
program is used for wall design. The soil pressures described above may be
used for the design of shoring structures.
26. Design Parameters -Unrestrained: The active earth pressure to be utilized
in the design of any cantilever retaining walls (utilizing on-site or imported
very low-to low-expansive soils [EI less than 50] as backfill) should be
based on an Equivalent Fluid Weight of 38 pounds per cubic foot (for level
backfill only). In the event that an unrestrained retaining wall is surcharged
by sloping backfill, the design active earth pressure should be based on the
appropriate Equivalent Fluid Weight presented in the following table.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 33
*To determine design active earth pressures for ratios intermediate to those
presented, interpolate between the stated values.
Backfill soils should consist of low-expansive soils with EI less than 501 and
should be placed from the heel of the foundation to the ground surface within
the wedge formed by a plane at 30° from vertical, and passing by the heel of
the foundation and the back face of the retaining wall.
27. Surcharge Loads: Any surcharge loads placed on the active wedge behind a
cantilever wall should be included in the design by multiplying the vertical
load by a factor of 0.31. This factor converts the vertical load to a horizontal
load.
28. Wall Drainage: Proper subdrains and free-draining backwall material or
board drains (such as J-drain or Miradrain) should be installed behind all
retaining walls (in addition to proper waterproofing) on the subject project
(see Figure No. VI for Retaining Wall Backdrain and Waterproofing
Schematic). Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. will assume no liability for
damage to structures or improvements that is attributable to poor drainage.
Architectural plans should clearly indicate that subdrains for any lower-level
walls be placed at an elevation at least 1 foot below the top of the outer face
of the footing, not on top of the footing. At least 0.5-percent gradient should
be provided to the subdrain.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 34
The subdrain should be placed in an envelope of crushed rock gravel up to 1
inch in maximum diameter, and be wrapped with Mirafi 140N filter fabric or
equivalent. The subdrain should consist of Amerdrain, QuickDrain
(rectangular section boards), or equivalent products. A sump pump may be
required if project elevations and discharge points do not allow for outlet via
gravity flow. The collected water should be taken to an approved drainage
facility. Open head joint subdrain discharge is not considered acceptable for
retaining walls. All subdrain systems should be provided with access risers
for periodic cleanout.
29. Drainage Quality Control: It must be understood that it is not within the
scope of our se~rvices to provide quality control oversight for surface or
subsurface drainage construction or retaining wall sealing and base of wall
drain construction. It is the responsibility of the contractor to verify proper
wall sealing, geofabric installation, protection board (if needed), drain depth
below interior floor or yard surface, pipe percent slope to the outlet, etc.
G. Site Drainage Considerations
30. Erosion Control: Appropriate erosion control measures should be taken at all
times during and after construction to prevent surface runoff waters from
entering footing excavations, ponding on finished building pad areas or
causing erosion on soil surfaces.
31. Surface Drainage: Adequate measures should be taken to properly finish-
grade the lot after the residential structures and other improvements are in
place. Drainage waters from this site and adjacent properties should be
directed away from the footings, floor slabs, and slopes, onto the natural
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 35
drainage direction for this area or into properly designed and approved
drainage facilities provided by the project civil engineer in the grading plans.
Roof gutters and downspouts should be installed on the residences, with the
runoff directed away from the foundations via closed drainage lines. Proper
subsurface and surface drainage will help minimize the potential for waters to
seek the level of the bearing soils under the footings and floor slabs.
Failure to observe this recommendation could result in undermining and
possible differential settlement of the structures or other improvements or
cause other moisture-related problems. Currently, the California Building
Code requires a minimum !-percent surface gradient for proper drainage of
building pads unless waived by the building official. Concrete pavement may
have a minimum gradient of 0.5-percent.
32. Planter Drainage: Planter areas, flower beds and planter boxes should be
sloped to drain away from the footings and floor slabs at a gradient of at
least 5 percent within 5 feet from the perimeter walls. Any planter areas
adjacent to the residences or surrounded by concrete improvements should
be provided with sufficient area drains to help with rapid runoff disposal. No
water should be allowed to pond adjacent to the residence or other
improvements or anywhere on the site.
H. General Recommendations
33. Project Start Up Notification: In order to reduce any work delays during site
development, this firm should be contacted at least 48 hours prior to any
need for observation of footing excavations or field density testing of
compacted fill soils. If possible, placement of formwork and steel
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 36
reinforcement in footing excavations should not occur prior to observing the
excavations; in the event that our observations reveal the need for
deepening or redesigning foundation structures at any locations, any
formwork or steel reinforcement in the affected footing excavation areas
would have to be removed prior to correction of the observed problem (i.e.,
deepening the footing excavation, recompacting soil in the bottom of the
excavation, etc.).
34. Construction Best Management Practices (BMPs): Construction BMPs must
be implemented in accordance with the requirements of the controlling
jurisdiction. At the very least, sufficient BMPs must be installed to prevent
silt, mud or other construction debris from being tracked into the adjacent
street(s) or storm water conveyance systems due to construction vehicles or
any other construction activity. The contractor is responsible for cleaning
any such debris that may be in the streets at the end of each work day or
after a storm event that causes breach in the installed construction BMPs.
All stockpiles of uncompacted soil and/or building materials that are intended
to be left unprotected for a period greater than 7 days are to be provided
with erosion and sediment controls. Such soil must be protected each day
when the probability of rain is 40% or greater. A concrete washout should
be provided on all projects that propose the construction of any concrete
improvements that are to be poured in place. All erosion/sediment control
devices should be maintained in working order at all times. All slopes that
are created or disturbed by construction activity must be protected against
erosion and sediment transport at all times. The storage of all construction
materials and equipment must be protected against any potential release of
pollutants into the environment.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
XI. GRADING NOTES
Job No. 15-10691
Page 37
Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. recommends that we be retained to verify the
actual soil conditions revealed during site grading work and footing excavation to be
as anticipated in this "Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation" for the
project. In addition, the compaction of any fill soils placed during site grading work
must be observed and tested by the soil engineer. It is the responsibility of the
grading contractor to comply with the requirements on the grading plans and the
local grading ordinance. All retaining wall and trench backfill should be properly
compacted. Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. will assume no liability for damage
occurring due to improperly or uncompacted backfill placed without our
observations and testing.
XII. LIMITATIONS
Our conclusions and recommendations have been based on available data obtained
from our field investigation and laboratory analysis, as well as our experience with
similar soils and formational materials located in this area of Carlsbad. Of
necessity, we must assume a certain degree of continuity between exploratory
excavations and/or natural exposures. It is, therefore, necessary that all
observations, conclusions, and recommendations be verified at the time grading
operations begin or when footing excavations are placed. In the event
discrepancies are noted, additional recommendations may be issued, if required.
The work performed and recommendations presented herein are the result of an
investigation and analysis that meet the contemporary standard of care in our
profession within the County of San Diego. No warranty is provided. This report
should be considered valid for a period of two (2) years, and is subject to review by
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 38
our firm following that time. If significant modifications are made to the building
plans, especially with respect to the height and location of any proposed structures,
this report must be presented to us for immediate review and possible revision.
It is the responsibility of the owner and/or developer to ensure that the
recommendations summarized in this report are carried out in the field operations
and that our recommendations for design of this project are incorporated in the
structural plans. We should be retained to review the project plans once they are
available, to see that our recommendations are adequately incorporated in the
plans.
As stated previously, it is not within the scope of our services to provide quality
control oversight for surface or subsurface drainage construction or retaining wall
sealing and base of wall drain construction. It is the responsibility of the contractor
and/or their retained construction inspection service provider to verify proper wall
sealing, geofabric installation, protection board installation (if needed), drain depth
below interior floor or yard surface, pipe percent slope to the outlet, etc.
This firm does not practice or consult in the field of safety engineering. We do not
direct the contractor's operations, and we cannot be responsible for the safety of
personnel other than our own; the safety of others is the responsibility of the
contractor. The contractor should notify the owner if he considered any of the
recommended actions presented herein to be unsafe.
The firm of Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. shall not be held responsible for
changes to the physical condition of the property, such as addition of fill soils or
changing drainage patterns, which occur subsequent to issuance of this report and
the changes are made without our observations, testing, and approval.
Rincon Residential Project
Carlsbad, California
Job No. 15-10691
Page 39
Once again, should any questions arise concerning this report, please feel free to
contact the undersigned. Reference to our lob No. 15-10691 will expedite a reply
to your inquiries.
Respectfully submitted,
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC.
Cath'a~~-----
Senior Project Geologist
t:ftclp~
C.E.G. 999/P.G. 3391
R.C.E. 34422/G.E. 2007
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
REFERENCES
JOB NO. 14-10691
March 2015
Association of Engineering Geologists, 1973, Geology and Earthquake Hazards, Planners Guide to the
Seismic Safety Element, Southern California Section, Association of Engineering Geologists, Special
Publication, p. 44.
Berger & Schug, 1991, Probabilistic Evaluation of Seismic Hazard in the San Diego-Tijuana
Metropolitan Region, Environmental Perils, San Diego Region, San Diego Association of Geologists.
Blake, T., 2002, EQFault and EQSearch Computer Programs for Deterministic Prediction and
Estimation of Peak Horizontal Acceleration from Digitized California Faults and Historical Earthquake
Catalogs.
California Geological Survey 2009 Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning, La Jolla
Quadrangle, San Diego County.
Cooksley, K., 2009-10, Report of Water Vapor Permeation Testing of Construction Vapor Barrier
Materials, Clemson University, Department of Packaging Science.
Crowell, J.C., 1962, Displacement Along the San Andreas Fault, California; Geologic Society of
America Special Paper 71, 61 p.
Demere, T.A., 2003, Geollogy of San Diego County, California, BRCC San Diego Natural History
Museum.
Greene, H.G., 1979, Implication of Fault Patterns in the Inner California Continental Borderland
between San Pedro and San Diego, in "Earthquakes and Other Perils, San Diego Region," P.L. Abbott
and W.J. Elliott, editors.
Greensfelder, R.W., 1974, Maximum Credible Rock Acceleration from Earthquakes in California; Calif.
Div. of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 23.
Hart, E.W., D.P. Smith, and R.B. Saul, 1979, Summary Report: Fault Evaluation Program, 1978 Area
(Peninsular Ranges-Salton Trough Region), Calif. Div. of Mines and Geology, OFR 79-10 SF, 10.
Hart E.W. and W.A. Bryant, 1997, Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, California Geological
Survey, Special Publication 42, Supplements 1 and 2 added 1999.
Hauksson, E. and L. Jones, 1988, The July 1988 Oceanside (ML=5.3) Earthquake Sequence in the
Continental Borderland, Southern California Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 78, p.
1885-1906.
Hileman, J.A., C.R. Allen and J.M. Nordquist, 1973, Seismicity of the Southern California Region,
January 1, 1932 to December 31, 1972; Seismological Laboratory, Cal-Tech, Pasadena, Calif.
Kennedy, M.P., 1975, Geology of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, California; Bulletin 200, Calif. Div.
of Mines and Geology.
Kennedy, M.P., S.H. Clarke, H.G. Greene, R.C. Jachens, V.E. Langenheim, J.J. Moore and D. M. Burns,
1994, A digital (GIS) Geological/Geophysical/Seismological Data Base for the San Diego 30x60
Quadrangle, California-A New Generation, Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v.
26, p. 63.
REFERENCES/Page 2
Kennedy, M.P. and S.H. Clarke, 1997A, Analysis of Late Quaternary Faulting in San Diego Bay and
Hazard to the Coronado Bridge, Calif. Div. of Mines and Geology Open-file Report 97-10A.
Kennedy, M.P. and S.H. Clarke, 1997B, Age of Faulting in San Diego Bay in the Vicinity of the
Coronado Bridge, an addendum to Analysis of Late Quaternary Faulting in San Diego Bay and Hazard
to the Coronado Bridge, Calif. Div. of Mines and Geology Open-file Report 97-10B.
Kennedy, M.P. and S.H. Clarke, 2001, Late Quaternary Faulting in San Diego Bay and Hazard to the
Coronado Bridge, California Geology.
Kennedy, M.P., S.S. Tan, R.H. Chapman, and G.W. Chase, 1975; Character and Recency of Faulting,
San Diego Metropolitan Area, California, Special Report 123, Calif. Div. of Mines and Geology.
Kennedy, M.P. and S.S. Tan, 2005 and 2008, Geologic Map of San Diego 30'x60' Quadrangle,
California, California Geological Survey, Dept. of Conservation.
Kennedy, M.P. and E.E. Welday, 1980, Character and Recency of Faulting Offshore, Metropolitan San
Diego California, Calif. Div. of Mines and Geology Map Sheet 40, 1:50,000.
Kern, J.P. and T.K. Rockwell, 1992, Chronology and Deformation of Quaternary Marine Shorelines, San
Diego County, California in Heath, E. and L. Lewis (editors), The Regressive Pleistocene Shoreline,
Coastal Southern California, pp. 1-8.
Kern, P., 1983, Earthquakes and Faults in San Diego, Pickle Press, San Diego, California.
McEuen, R.B. and C.J. Pinckney, 1972, Seismic Risk in San Diego; Transactions of the San Diego
Society of Natural History, v. 17, No.4.
Richter, C.G., 1958, Elementary Seismology, W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, Calif.
Rockwell, T.K., D.E. Millman, R.S. McElwain, and D.L. Lamar, 1985, Study of Seismic Activity by
Trenching Along the Glen Ivy North Fault, Elsinore Fault Zone, Southern California: Lamar-Merifield
Technical Report 85-1, U.S.G.S. Contract 14-08-0001-21376, 19 p.
Simons, R.S., 1977, Seismicity of San Diego, 1934-1974, Seismological Society of America Bulletin, v.
67, p. 809-826.
Southern California San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Seismic Source Characterization Research
Project, 2012, Paleoseismic Assessment of the Late Holocene Rupture History of the Rose Canyon
Fault in San Diego.
Tan, S.S., 1995, Landslide Hazards in Southern Part of San Diego Metropolitan Area, San Diego
County, Calif. Div. of Mines and Geology Open-file Report 95-03.
Toppozada, T.R. and D.L. Parke, 1982, Areas Damaged by California Earthquakes, 1900-1949; Calif.
Div. of Mines and Geology, Open-file Report 82-17, Sacramento, Calif.
Treiman, J.A., 1993, The Rose Canyon Fault Zone, Southern California, Calif. Div. of Mines and
Geology Open-file Report 93-02, 45 pp, 3 plates.
URS Project No. 27653042.00500 (2010), San Diego County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan
San Diego County, California.
U.S.G.S. Earthquake Hazards Program, 2010, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/.
VICINITY MAP
Rincon Residential Lot
3806 Garfield Street
Carlsbad, CA. Figure No. I
Job No. 15-10691
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t i!l'
·FS=6488
o26'--,-7---~ ! __ ---_ HEM!-OCKAYE.
I \ -,.-
1 ~ '
' /FS~57 31 _jFS"56 09 ' FS=56 69 ___ N~16"E726~--Y--__ 'f. __ ~-__ -&--_ _ __ _
ASPH ~ I ~ ~ St\IVER
I C><J
1\ ( I '•S-&> 49' ~r-=-----~.:._00' __
d 56
~I j ~I (
I
! I \
[:;; 1,
GI ·--=l -
ASPH ... I I .. \TC<6492 0 l fa '
1
I \:J ;~65 40
~MANHQE
4>
rc~s~ 28
\
1,..---3000'
1
I ~~56 · ~ : MANHOLE
I
I C><JI~ C><J ~
LOGPOLE I
RET AININ3 WALL I tJl 1a
I .TC<6130 \ .T,.,.on..,.., f TC=5850.18 -::::= •/C=OJoo j I ~ -j / _' ' / -----L e ' f> ' :VTC=5741
TCa6300
z
~ d ij
~ .. ~
GS,6569
HP-1
~50
GS-65 '3
~
~~~-----------------
METER
G$=6523
LOT 2, BLOCK M,
MAP 1747
APN
204-270.03
I
l~======-~-~-~-~-=-=_====_======~~
&op 6-7 \GS:E089
'5
G$=6087/
G$=5952
I
I
I~
(I) I~ ~::1: ~~~ m z~l "'o ~~I
i I
!i: I ~
;-~------------------------------~
I
i LOT 3, BLOCK M,
MAP 1747
""
TC=5912 "
...
"" FO 3/'f' IRON PIPE
WITH BRASS DISC
RE8250
\~s~5818 .. .,
" q /FS=58 21 -:
...
r t r-----'-
~
"I I
APN
204-270.05
PORTION OF
LOT 19, BLOCK M,
MAP 1747
~,;.
~
--------------I 0 w ~ 30
SCALE: 1" = 201 I
FO 2'' IRON PIPE WITH """ \ I
BRASS DISC RE 8250 ~JJ._ -
PASCO LARET SUITER
-----· llllSSOC~IlTIES 535 Nor1b JliFway 101, SicA. Sow.al!cedl, CA 92075
pb 858.259.8212 1 fx 858-259-48121 p1lllelllineering.com
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY MAP -3806 GARFIELD ST.
LEGEND
SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
niS MAP OORRECTl.Y REFRESENT'S A Sl.AVEY NADE BY ME OR LNJER MY
OIRECTK:J\1 N CX::If'oFOfUtANCE wrrH 1lE: REOUtRa!ENTS a: ll-£
PRaESSOW. ~ Sl.Ollo£YORS ICf ON 0210&201~
~~
PROJECT INFORMATION
Q.IENf RINCON REA!. ESTATE GROl.P
AOORESS 3808GARFIB.DST CARLSBAD CA. e2064
-2()4.271><>1
ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 1 IN !LOCK 'V' tY-FW.J8AOES IN Tt-E CfTY OF CARI..SBAD, COl.JIITY OF SAN
OIEOO, STATE OF CAUFCANJA, .IOCOROONG TO T>E MAP T>EREOF NO 1747
ALED IN n-E OFFICE OF Tl-E COI.Nf"( RE<X)R()ER OF SAN 01:00 C'OltiN, FEBRUARV 5, 1;23
(AS DESCRIBED IN OOITQ.NM DEED RECORtiOD IN T>E CFFICE OF THE SAN
DIEOOCOUNTV RECOROER AS ooc:::uMENT 1~)
SURVEY NOTES
1 T>E BDUNOARES iH:J DIMENSIONS OF T>E SURVEYED PAACa.(S)
~HEREON ME BASED OJ A FIELD~ R£C0R0 Ollr.IENSK:NS
MAV VNf:'f THE e:::::Jt..lf«)ES C:S AO..IONNG PARCB..S \\ERE COMPI..BJ
FROM RECXlROED a! FLED Oo\T A, NV ARE TO BE USED Faii'UINNING
PURPOSESCN.Y
2 B..EVATK:NS SHCMt4 HEREON ARE BASED ON CITY C6 CARt..S8..tD
CONTRO..STATICN 1•1. PER RECXRDCF SlRVEY NO 1n11
aEVATK:N 28 7f1 Oo\TUiol (Nfoli().ee)
3 Tt£ LOCAllONS OF LNlERGROI.foiD UTL1TY LINES A>DCR STRIJCTI.RES
AS SHOMo! HEREON ARE BASED ON OBSER\IED 1«NE GRCJo.N)
EVIlENCE NV RECORD NFORMATION PACMDEDTOTHE SUlVFIOR
N08<CAVATIONS v.ERE II.ADE DURING T>E COJRSE OF THIS~
TO LOCATE lKIERGRClJiooD UT1.1TES LOCATIONS OF UNilERGRO.H>
UTI.JTIES WAY VNN FROM LOCATtONS S~ HEREQ'Ia A(X)f1'l()NAL
l.NJERClRCJI.JN) UTLmES MAY EXIST
LEGEND
e ~ IIKNJWEHl AS NOTED
..
Pf!OPERTY LI<E
RIGHT<F-WAVLtE
COITD>UooE
~lNG PROF'ERTY U1E
FENCEUooE _,_
NlEX CCHTllUI UooE
MER"-EDATE CONTOI..R lJt£
CNf_~ ROOF LINf
A!PtW..T 8lRFN:E.
TC TOPOFCURB
F RNI8ED8URF~
GRQ.OOSURFACE
\l) 'TREE (CECClUOUS)
* TREE (PAUl)
u RR£tMlf<Nlr
-o-F'Oo'oERPOlE
t>od WATERVN..VE
SIGN
CXlHCR£TE SUIFACE
DRiCKSIJRf"'NX. PLOT PLAN
Rincon Residential Lot
3806 Garfield Street
Carlsbad, CA.
Figure No. II
Job No. 15-10691 REFERENCE: This Plot Plan was prepared from an
existing SITE PLAN by Shackelton Design Group
dated 2/6/2015 and from a Topographic Survey Map
by Pasco Laret Suiter dated 2/23/2015 and from
on-site field reconnaissance performed by GEl.
~ HP-5 Approximate Location
of Exploratory Handpit CJ Pro pos ed Structure D Geotechnical Exploration, Inc.
March 2015
15-1 0691-p.ai Qop 6-7 Old Paralic Deposits
EQUIPMENT DIMENSION & TYPE OF EXCAVATION DATE LOGGED
Hand Tools 2' X 2' X 4.5' Handpit 2-11-15
SURFACE ELEVATION GROUNDWATER/ SEEPAGE DEPTH lOGGED BY
± 65.5' Mean Sea Level Not Encountered CKG
FIELD DESCRIPTION ~ AND ~ lrcu .... lrcu if CLASSIFICATION c ...,: lh w c.s, ~~ Cc. q .:g. wa: ~~ ~~ ~q + '. ~ _. li l (.)::::1 ::I ::::I ::I~ _.
:I: 0 DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS 51-5cn ~~--~--~ :Z~ 1-1-a) a..~ -(/) ~~ (/)-~z 3:;Z a.. ~ (Grain size, Density, Moisture, Color) a..z !i:o zo o:::> w > •0 • w ~~ ~e >< 0 ..... o c (/) ~~ ~c 0~ wu a)(.)
SILTY SAND fine-to mediurn-yrc:urled. Loose-to ~
-medium dense. Damp. Red-brown.
-WEATHERED OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS (Qop
-6-7)
1-
-
-
-
2-I --@ 2'-probes easily to 9"-12". 5.0 96.6 77 -
i 1 5.1 -1---18% passing #200 sieve.
'X -8.3 125.3 transitions to ...
3 -----------------------------sliif :~ SILTY SAND, fine-to medium-grained. Medium 2.3 102.5 84 -':· dense. Damp. Light red-brown.
-, !--OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS (Qop6•7)
1!: ~ 1.9 102.7 84 -·
4-'j I '1-
--17% passing #200 sieve. ~ 1.9 104.2 86
-I
I· : ;, !)< 8.5 121.7
~ -
5-~ Bottom @ 4.5'
l -
-
~ -
y_ JOB NAME PERCHED WATER TABLE Rincon Residential ~.uJ""'
~ BULK BAG SAMPLE SITE LOCATION
~ II] IN-PLACE SAMPLE 3806 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA
~ • JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY LDR/JAC LOG No . MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLE z 15-10691 ,~ ... ~~@ HP-1 0 0 ~ NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY TEST FIGURE NUMBER 1'~~1• "•Ill ;·Inc. 1>: 0 ~ ..J STANDARD PENETRATION TEST a. lila I~' X w
EQUIPMENT DIMENSION & TYPE OF EXCAVATION DATE LOGGED
Hand Tools 2' X 2' X 6' Handpit 2-11-15
SURFACE ELEVATION GROUNDWATER! SEEPAGE DEPTH LOGGED BY
± 65' Mean Sea Level Not Encountered CKG
FIELD DESCRIPTION ~ AND 7 ~'S ~ ~'S c CLASSIFICATION ~ ._; ci CD wl::! o,s ::::;:!;:! Oa. ci + ~ o_ :!.. ...J ~~ ::::;:~ ~q ~ ~ <!) si= :::l:::l :::l~ WCI) :I: 0 DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS ·o ~!Z ...JW ~c;; ::::;:t-::::;:-~~ ~(I) 1-CD a.. <..) -(I) ~~ a..:z: a.. ::::;: ::::;: (Grain size, Density, Moisture, Color) <!) a..~ ~ffi li:o g_Z o:::> ::::;:o w ~ <( •0 ~e:.. xo ...JO <'j~ 0 (I) => ;g;::::;: ;g;o o::::;: ::::;:~ wo CDO
SIL TV SAND, fine-to medium-grained, with SM -extensive roots. Loose to medium dense. Damp.
-Red-brown.
-WEATHERED OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS (Qop
1-. 6-7, .
-. -
-.
2-
-. -.
-.
3-.
--becomes medium dense. -.
-·-5.2 104.4 83 -
4-. . -. -.
-.
5-. . -.
-~~~~~~J~~------------------/ s"M -SIL TV SAND, fine-to medium-grained. Medium
6-~ dense. Damp. Light red-brown.
~ r -
-OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS (Qop,;.7)
-
-Bottom@ 6'
7-
-
.!. JOB NAME
PERCHED WATER TABLE Rincon Residential Project
~ BULK BAG SAMPLE SITE LOCATION
m IN-PLACE SAMPLE 3806 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA
• JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY LDRIJAC LOG No.
MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLE
~ NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY TEST 15-10691 f"rt,-HP-2 FIGURE NUMBER Exploration, Inc.
~ STANDARD PENETRATION TEST lllb ~
EQUIPMENT DIMENSION & TYPE OF EXCAVATION DATELOGGED
Hand Tools 2' X 2' X 4.5' Handpit 2-11-15
SURFACE ELEVATION GROUNDWATER! SEEPAGE DEPTH LOGGED BY
± 63' Mean Sea Level Not Encountered CKG
FIELD DESCRIPTION ~
AND ~ ircu ~ i'rcu c
~ CLASSIFICATION ....,: c:i w c.s, ::!:~ CCL c:i . c:i~ ~ wa:: ~~ ::!:-~q + _j ~ ..... w en O::l ::l::l ::l~ wen :I: 0 ..... DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS :51-:Sw ~t:; ~Ci) -::!: zg -'W 1-CD c.. c.:i en-s:z C.. :I: c.. ::!: ::!: (Grain size, Density, Moisture, Color) en a..!!2 c..z 1--~z zo ~ z o::l :!:o w >-c,; •0 •w c..O ::!:~ ~c xo ..... o c,;a Cl en ::i ~::!: ~Cl 0::!: wo CDO
~ ~ SILTY SAND, fine-to medium-grained, with SM
-roots. Loose to medium dense. Damp. ~ Red-brown. -~ K :?< FILU -WALL BACKFILL (Qaf)
1 -
-
-
-
2-
-
--@ north-south perforated corrugated subdrain -with some gravel.
-~
3-:> SILTY SAND, fine-to medium-grained. Medium SM . dense. Damp. Red-brown. -. . OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS (Qopd -.
-. .
4-----------------------------r-SM SILTY SAND, fine-to medium-grained. Medium
-.· dense. Damp. Light red-tan-brown.
, ..
-1-'--'-'-'-\ OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS (Qopl\.7) r 1---
-
5-Bottom @ 4.5'
-
-
-
y JOB NAME PERCHED WATER TABLE Rincon Residential Project
~ BULK BAG SAMPLE SITE LOCATION
m IN-PLACE SAMPLE 3806 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA
• JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY LDRIJAC LOG No . MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLE
@] NUCLEAR FJELD DENSITY TEST 15-10691 4r~jl-~ HP-3 FIGURE NUMBER Exploration, Inc.
~ STANDARD PENETRATION TEST lllc ~
b C)
~
§
~
EQUIPMENT DIMENSION & TYPE OF EXCAVATION
Hand Tools 2' X 2' X 4.5' Handpit
SURFACE ELEVATION GROUNDWATER/ SEEPAGE DEPTH
± 61' Mean Sea Level Not Encountered
-
-
-
1-
-
-
-.
2-
-
-
-
3-
-
-
-
4-.. i: .
-
FIELD DESCRIPTION
AND
CLASSIFICATION
DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS
(Grain size, Density, Moisture, Color)
SILTY SAND , fine-to medium-grained, with
some tree roots. Loose to medium dense. Damp.
Red-brown.
WEATHERED OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS (Qop
6-7)
--@ 2'-probes to 6"-12".
--becomes medium dense.
<t.i d <t.i ::i
SM
r--sl[ffSANo :-trne-To-medium-9raineCi:-tii1earun;--'S1f
dense to dense. Damp. Light red-tan-brown.
_L:2_ f"\ OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS (Qop,;,7) 1'-~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~----J
-
5-Bottom @ 4.5'
-
-
-
DATE LOGGED
2-11-15
LOGGED BY
CKG
~ fi'S fi:'fl ~ e:. ci ~ 0 w o,s :0~ CCL ' d~ wo::: ~1: :o-i:c:i + ....i !.!:: :Si= :::>:::> =>1: (/) w<n :::Scn :!til :0--:0 :Z g ~!z ....IW ~~ ~0 <( C.. :I: c..~ c..z li:o c.. z o=> :00 •0 •w w~ X 0 ..... o <CZ ~:0 ~0 0:0 :0~ 0-w (.) mo w=
5.6 100.0 80
~~--~--~~------------------------------------~--~--~--~--~----._~----~--~~ ~
§
i?:
j
C) g
z ~ g
~
.Y
[gJ
ITJ • [§]
~
PERCHED WATER TABLE
BULK BAG SAMPLE
IN-PLACE SAMPLE
MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLE
NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY TEST
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
JOB NAME
Rincon Residential Project
SITE LOCATION
3806 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA
JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY LDRIJAC LOG No.
15-10691 ·r.;&--HP-4 FIGURE NUMBER Exploration, Inc.
llld ~
"' ~
15 C)
..J ll. ~
@
C)
~
EQUIPMENT DIMENSION & TYPE OF EXCAVATION
Hand Tools 2' X 2' X 4' Handpit
SURFACE ELEVATION GROUNDWATER! SEEPAGE DEPTH
± 60' Mean Sea Level Not Encountered
'if ~ _, w :::c 0 _,
1-Ol Q. Q. :;: :;: w fii ~ 0
-~ _g ~
-
1-
-
-
-
2-
-
-
-
FIELD DESCRIPTION
AND
CLASSIFICATION
DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS
(Grain size, Density, Moisture, Color)
SILTY SAND, fine-to medium-grained, with
roots to 6" in diameter (large rubber tree). Loose.
Damp. Red-brown.
FILL (Qaf)
SILTY SAND, fine-to medium-grained. Medium
dense. Damp. R.ed-brown.
OLD PARALIC DEPOSITS (Qop6•7)
cri 0 cri ::;
SM
SM
3 -· :: ,_ Sl[f\,-SAND ~fine-iO mediu-m-:gralned. -Medium--r-SM
_ . · · dense. Damp. Light red-tan-brown.
-•,, OLD PAIRALIC DEPOSITS (Qop6•7) _.
' 4-~
-
-Bottom@ 4'
-
5-
-
-
-
DATE LOGGED
2-11-15
LOGGED BY
CKG
~ ~
~ ~'5' ~ ~'5' ~
ci ....: c:i w o,e, :d~ Oca. ' d~ wa:: ~~ :;:-~q + __; ~ U:J =>i= ::::>~ WCI)
:51-::Sen :;:-_:;: :Z g s:!z ...JW ~(I) -(/) ~0 a..:::c a..22 a..z li:o ~z <z o=> :;:u •0 'W :;:l!;l ~~ ~0 _,o ~~ 6:;: 6o o:;: wu OlU
~~--~--~~------------------------------------~--~--~--~--~----~~----~--~~ I
8 z ii:
~
9
i5 ~ g
ll. ~ '
-!.
~
[I] • ~
~
PERCHED WATER TABLE
BULK BAG SAMPLE
IN-PLACE SAMPLE
MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLE
NUCLEAR FIELD DENSITY TEST
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
JOB NAME
Rincon Residential Project
SITE LOCATION
3806 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA
JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY LDRIJAC LOG No.
15-10691 4~.,--. HP-5 FIGURE NUMBER Exploration, Inc.
llle % ,)
135 1\
\
\ 1\
\
130 1\ ~
~ \
\
\ \
1\ \
125 :.... 1\ \
1\ \ r\
' \ Source of Mat~rial HP-1 @2.5'
1\ \ \ SILTY SAND {SM}i Red-brown ~ \ 1\ \ Description of Material
120 ~ 1\
\ \ Test Method ASTM 01557 Method A
\ \
\
\
115 \ 1\
\
\ 1\ TEST RESULTS
\ ' \ \ Maximum Dry Density 125.3 PCF
110 \ ' Optimum Water Content 8.3% \ 1\
'0 \ a. \ 1\ ~ \ Expansion Index (EI)
ii) [\ \ z 105 w \ 0
?i 1\ \
0 1\ 1\.
\ '
100 \ 1\.
1\ \ Curves of 100% Saturation 1\ ' 1\. for Specific Gravity Equal to: \
r'\ \ 2.80
95 1\ \
\ 1\. 2.70
1\ \ I\.
1\ 2.60
1\. 1\
90 1'\. I\.
"' \
\ ' r'\ ' ~
85 1'\. I\.
'\:: \..
" '\
' '\
'\
80 " " "' " " " ['._
75 " 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
WATER CONTENT,%
-~&-II Geotechnical MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
Exploration, Inc. Figure Number: IVa
-~~~~ Job Name: Rincon Residential Project
~~~ Site Location: 3806 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA
Job Number: 15-10691
135 \ ' \ ~
\
\
130 \
\ i\
\
\ ~
\ \
125 \
\ \
\ Source of Material HP-1 @4.3'
\ ~ SIL TV SAND {SM}i Light ~ [\\ Description of Material
120 I"'"" • 1\ red-tan-brown .. f'l \ i\ \ Test Method ASTM 01557 Method A \ \ \
' \ \
\
115 \ 1\
\
\ \ TEST RESULTS
\ ' \ \ Maximum Dry Density 121.7 PCF
110 \ Optimum Water Content 8.5% \ \ -\""' g_ g \ !\ Expansion Index (EI) \
z 105 1\
w 1\ \ 0
>-1\ \ a:: \ 0 \ ' 100 \ \.
\ \ 1\. Curves of 1 00% Saturation \ 1\. for Specific Gravity Equal to: \
~ \ 2.80
95 1'\ ' \ '\. 2.70
1\ \
'\: ' 2.60
\. '\
90 ' 1\.
"' \. ~ i'\ ' b \. ' C! "\ ' 85 '\ ~
"" \..
"" '\
" " ~ '\ too.
80
. ......_
"' r--. ' I'.. " ' 75 "l
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 j
WATER CONTENT,% j
4(;-4~1 Geotechnical MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONS!1
Exploration, Inc. Figure Number: IVb j
~~~ Job Name: Rincon Residential Project j
~~t' Site Location: 3806 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA J
Job Number: 15-10691 j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
i
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
--On.hore bM4I {h)'~ ¥f00r•phy .... trMIPONliOrl) 11'0'!1 U S.G S diQ1tel line I!"'IC!h COLGJ ~ Sen o.go :JO' a tO' l'l'leWic ~ Shlded ~--~VSCiS ~.....,_,~
{DEll'a) OlllihoN ~ ~ .-ciiNdlcl
~~NOAA, ..... .nd ,.-..-. ~ ~-"""---11.Nolt"'~Druloi 1N7
=usGs __. .... .......,...,..,.
T!Wt~..,..Nno«<ln l*'tb'!'IN US ~ ~ NalklNI ~ Geologc Mic:l)lflg P1'QOrMI
STAT£1o&APA"1111'G no. SIII1QA.G2(MI
~~~wilniN US Geologal ~ ~C.....M"'-~Pwlfld
~ .......... ~-.. eo--.._,.,...,.,...., No,.rtof .. ~fN)'be~
~""""-"allf'IMI'I efiNCeilklr,..~~
~of~"'*-t'IO...,.,..,.._.IIDiht
~ol ... ~lrorq~ ... poM
rincon-3806-gorfield-geo.oi
Rincon Residential Lot
3806 Garfield Street
Carlsbad, CA.
Contour Interval 50m
EXCERT FROM GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE OCEANSIDE 30' X 60' QUADRANGLE, CALIFORNIA
~
EJ
GJ
..
c....,.,,..,">
Mu·ltad P K~1mNI> •NI Sla"'f S. Turf
1/)(JJ
Dq;u.al J~u..,. by
Kl'll) lt. 81.1lvnJI ltm-MI M AI'-'IINI j fkluHI J W~l
I LS~.a..w, o.--11!/ ...... '-.._ ~If/(.._ .......
DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS
Old paralic deposits undivided (late to middle
Pleistocene)-Mostly poorly sorted, moderately permeable,
reddish-brown, interfingered strandline, beach, estuarine and
colluvial deposits composed of siltstone, sandstone and
conglomerate. These deposits rest on the now emergent wave
cut abmsion platforms preserved by regional uplill. Whert•
more than one number is shown (e.g., Oo1>2..V those deposits
are undivided (Fig. 3). Includes:
O ld paralic deposits, Unit 7 (late to middle
Pleistocene)-Mostly poorly sorted, moderately pcnncablc,
reddish-brown, interfingered strandline, beach, estuarine
and colluvial deposits composed of siltstone, sandstone mtd
conglomerate. These deposits rest on the 9-1 I m Bird Rock
terrace (Fig. 3)
O ld paralic deposits, Unit 6 (late to middle
Plelstocene)-Mostly poorly sorted, moderately permeable,
t-eddish-brown, interfingered strandline, beach, estuarine
and colluvial deposits composed of siltstone, sandstone and
conglomerate. These deposits rest on the 22-23 m Nestor
terrace (FiJI.. 3)
Santiago Formation (mjddJe Eocene)-Named by Woodring
and Popenoe (1945) for Eocene deposits of northwestern
Santa Ana Mowttains. There arc three distinctive parts. A
basal member that consists of buff and brownish-gray,
masstve, coarse-grained, poorly sorted arkosic sandstone and
conglomerate (sandstone generally predominating). In scme
areas the basal member is overlain by gray and brownish-gray
(salt and pepper) central member that consists of soft,
medium-grained, moderately well-scrted arkosic sandstone.
An upper member consists of gray, coarse-grained arkosic
sandstone and grit Throughout the fonnalion, both vertically
and laterally, tltere exists greenish-brown, massive claystone
interbeds, tongues and lenses of often fossiliferous, lagoonal
claystone and siltstone. The lower part of the Santiago
Formation interfingers with the Delmar Formation and Torrey
Sandstone in the Encinitas quadrangle
70
_1_-%-········-··
. ---;-----
f)
~
eo ~
..g..
55
ONSHORE MAP SYMBOLS
Contact -Contact between geologoc units. dolled where c:once31ed
Faull -Solid where accurately located; dashed where
approximately located; dotted where concealed U • upthrown
b1oclc. D • downthrown block Arraw and number indicate
direction and angle of d1p of fauh plane.
Anticline -Sohd where accurately located, dashed where
approximately located; dotted where concealed. Arrow
Indicates direction o1 axial plunge
Syncline -Solid where accurately located dotted where concealed
ArrriN Indicates direction of axl81 plunge.
Landslide -ArrC1NI Indicate pnnapal d1raction of movement
Queried where existence IS queshonable.
Stnke and d•p ol beds
loomed
Str11<e and dip of Igneous joints
lncl1ned
Vertical
Sllike and dip ol metamorphic loliation
Inclined
Figure No. V
Job No. 15-10691 llii--· ~ Exploration, Inc .
~ March2015
SCHEMATIC RETAINING WALL SUBDRAIN
3-Foot High
Free-Standing ------11'~
Masonry Wall
Asphalt Parking Lot
( Adjacent Property)
Miradrain 6000
Retaining
Wall~
Waterproofing
Yard Area Soils
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE: As an option to Miradrain 6000, gravel or
crushed rock, 3/4" maximum diameter may be used
with a minimum 12" thickness along the interior face
of the wall and 2.0 cu.ft./ft of pipe gravel envelope.
15-10691-V/
Perforated PVC (SDR 35)
4" pipe with 0.25% min.
slope, with bottom of
pipe located 12" below
yard elevation, with 1.5
(cu.ft.) of gravel1" diameter
max. wrapped with filter
cloth such as Miradrain 6000.
For yard area conditions in
front of retaining wall, the
subdrain may be placed on
top of foundation. Ameridrain,
Quickdrain or equivalent
products may be used as
an alternative.
Miradrain Cloth
Figure No. VI
Job No. 15-10691
olll~ Geotechnical ~~,.., I Exploration, Inc.
~ March2015
APPENDIX A
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART
SOIL DESCRIPTION
Coarse-grained (More than half of material is larger than a No. 200 sieve)
GRAVELS, CLEAN GRAVELS
(More than half of coarse fraction
is larger than No. 4 sieve size, but
smaller than 3")
GRAVELS WITH FINES
(Appreciable amount)
SANDS, CLEAN SANDS
(More than half of coarse fraction
is smaller than a No.4 sieve)
SANDS WITH FINES
(Appreciable amount)
GW Well-graded gravels, gravel and sand mixtures, little
or no fines.
GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel and sand mixtures, little or
no fines.
GC Clay gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-silt mixtures
SW Well-graded sand, gravelly sands, little or no fines
SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines.
SM Silty sands, poorly graded sand and silty mixtures.
SC Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures.
Fine-grained (More than half of material is smaller than a No. 200 sieve)
SILTS AND CLAYS
Liquid Limit Less than 50
Liquid Limit Greater than 50
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
(rev. 6/05)
ML Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt
and clayey-silt sand mixtures with a slight plasticity
CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly
clays, silty clays, clean clays.
OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity.
MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or
silty soils, elastic silts.
CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays.
OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity.
PT Peat and other highly organic soils
APPENDIX B
SEISMIC DATA EQ FAULT TABLES
Rincon Garf eqf peak TEST.OUT
***********************
* * * *
E Q F A U L T * * * Version 3.00 *
* * ***********************
DETERMINISTIC ESTIMATION OF
PEAK ACCELERATION FROM DIGITIZED FAULTS
JOB NUMBER: 15-10691
JOB NAME: Rincon Garfield eqf Test Run
CALCULATION NAME: Rincon Garf eqfTest Run Analysis
FAULT-DATA-FILE NAME: CDMGFLTE.DAT
SITE COORDINATES:
SITE LATITUDE: 33.1497
SITE LONGITUDE: 117.3447
SEARCH RADIUS: 100 mi
DATE: 03-02-2015
ATTENUATION RELATION: 8) Bozorgnia Campbell Niazi (1999) Hor.-Soft Rock-Uncor.
UNCERTAINTY (M=Median, S=Sigma): M Number of Sigmas: 0.0
DISTANCE MEASURE: cdist
SCOND: 0
Basement Depth: 5.00 km campbell SSR: 1 campbell SHR: 0
COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION
FAULT-DATA FILE USED: CDMGFLTE.DAT
MINIMUM DEPTH VALUE (km): 3.0
Page 1
Rincon Garf eqf peak TEST.OUT
EQFAULT SUMMARY
DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS
Page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------I ESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT
I APPROXIMATE -------------------------------ABBREVIATED I DISTANCE MAXIMUM PEAK JEST. SITE
FAULT NAME I mi (km) EARTHQUAKE I SITE I INTENSITY
MAG.(Mw) I ACCEL. g IMOD.MERC. ================================ ============== ==========!==========!========= ROSE CANYON 4.7( 7.6) 6.9 I 0.402 I X
NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (offshore) 5.2( 8.4) 6.9 I 0.384 I x CORONADO BANK 20.6( 33.2) 7.4 I 0.162 I VIII
ELSINORE-TEMECULA 24.7( 39.7) 6.8 I 0.085 I VII
ELSINORE-JULIAN 24.9( 40.0) 7.1 I 0.105 I VII
ELSINORE-GLEN IVY 34.1( 54.9) 6.8 I 0.057 I VI
PALOS VERDES 35.6( 57.3) 7.1 I 0.068 I VI
EARTHQUAKE VALLEY 44.2( 71.2) 6.5 I 0.032 I v
NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin) 46.1( 74.2) 6.9 I 0.042 I VI
SAN JACINTO-ANZA 47.2( 76.0) 7.2 0.051 I VI
SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VALLEY 47.7( 76.8) 6.9 0.040 V
CHINO-CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore) 48.0( 77.3) 6.7 0.040 I V
WHITTIER 51.6( 83.0) 6.8 0.033 I V
SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK 52.9( 85.1) 6.8 0.032 I V
COMPTON THRUST 55.8( 89.8) 6.8 0.041 I V
ELSINORE-COYOTE MOUNTAIN 58.3( 93.8) 6.8 0.028 I V
ELYSIAN PARK THRUST 58.8( 94.6)1 6.7 0.035 I V
SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO 60.2( 96.9) 6.7 0.025 I V
SAN ANDREAS -San Bernardino 65.4( 105.3) 7.3 0.036 I V
SAN ANDREAS -Southern 65.4( 105.3) 7.4 0.039 I V
SAN JACINTO-BORREGO 66.7( 107.3) 6.6 0.020 I IV
SAN JOSE 68.9( 110.9) 6.5 0.021 I IV
PINTO MOUNTAIN 72.4( 116.5) 7.0 0.025 I V
SIERRA MADRE 72.5( 116.7) 7.0 0.030 I V
CUCAMONGA 72.8( 117.2) 7.0 0.030 I V
SAN ANDREAS -Coachella 73.6( 118.4) 7.1 0.027 I V
NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (West) 76.2( 122.6) 7.0 0.028 I V
CLEGHORN 77.9( 125.4) 6.5 0.015 I IV
BURNT MTN. 78.5( 126.3) 6.4 0.014 I IV
RAYMOND 80.5( 129.6) 6.5 0.017 I IV
NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (East) 80.7( 129.9) 6.7 0.020 J IV
SAN ANDREAS-Mojave 81.0( 130.3) 7.1 0.024 I IV
SAN ANDREAS -1857 Rupture 81.0( 130.3) 7.8 0.041 I V
EUREKA PEAK 81.3( 130.8) 6.4 0.013 I III
CLAMSHELL-SAWPIT 82.3( 132.5) 6.5 0.017 I IV
SUPERSTITION MTN. (San Jacinto) 83.0( 133.6) 6.6 0.015 I IV
VERDUGO 83.1( 133.8) 6.7 0.020 I IV
HOLLYWOOD I 84.9( 136.7)1 6.4 0.015 I IV
ELMORE RANCH I 86.6( 139.4)1 6.6 0.014 I IV
SUPERSTITION HILLS (San Jacinto)! 87.7( 141.1)1 6.6 0.014 I IV
Page 2
Page 2
Rincon Garf eqf peak TEST.OUT
DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS
!ESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT
APPROXIMATE 1------------------------------ABBREVIATED DISTANCE I MAXIMUM PEAK lEST. SITE
FAULT NAME mi (km) !EARTHQUAKE SITE !INTENSITY
I MAG.(Mw) ACCEL. g IMOD.MERC. ================================ ==============I========== ==========I========= LANDERS 88.2( 142.0)1 7.3 0.025 V
HELENDALE-S. LOCKHARDT 88.7( 142.8)1 7.1 0.021 IV
SANTA MONICA 89.5( 144.1)1 6.6 0.016 IV
LAGUNA SALADA 89.6( 144.2)1 7.0 0.019 IV
MALIBU COAST 92.1( 148.2)1 6.7 0.017 IV
LENWOOD-LOCKHART-OLD WOMAN SPRGS 92.8( 149.3)1 7.3 0.023 IV
BRAWLEY SEISMIC ZONE 95.8( 154.1)1 6.4 0.011 III
JOHNSON VALLEY (Northern) 96.0( 154.5)1 6.7 0.014 III
NORTHRIDGE (E. Oak Ridge) 96.3( 155.0)1 6.9 0.022 IV
EMERSON So. -COPPER MTN. 96.5( 155.3)1 6.9 0.016 IV
SIERRA MADRE (San Fernando) 96.9( 156.0)1 6.7 0.016 IV
SAN GABRIEL 97.2( 156.4)1 7.0 0.017 IV
ANACAPA-DUME I 98.7( 158.8)1 7.3 0.026 v *******************************************************************************
-END OF SEARCH-53 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS.
THE ROSE CANYON FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE.
IT IS ABOUT 4.7 MILES (7.6 km) AWAY.
LARGEST MAXIMUM-EARTHQUAKE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.4016 g
Page 3
Rincon Garf eqf rhga TEST.OUT
***********************
* * * E Q F A U L T *
* * *
version 3.00 * * * ***********************
DETERMINISTIC ESTIMATION OF
PEAK ACCELERATION FROM DIGITIZED FAULTS
JOB NUMBER: 15-10691
JOB NAME: Rincon Garfield eqf Test Run
CALCULATION NAME: Rincon Garf eqfTest Run Analysis
FAULT-DATA-FILE NAME: CDMGFLTE.DAT
SITE COORDINATES:
SITE LATITUDE: 33.1497
SITE LONGITUDE: 117.3447
SEARCH RADIUS: 100 mi
DATE: 03-02-2015
ATTENUATION RELATION: 8) Bozorgnia campbell Niazi (1999) Hor.-soft Rock-uncor.
UNCERTAINTY (M=Median, S=Sigma): M Number of Sigmas: 0.0 DISTANCE MEASURE: cdist
SCOND: 0
Basement Depth: 5.00 km campbell SSR: 1 campbell SHR: 0
COMPUTE RHGA HORIZ. ACCEL. (FACTOR: 0.65 DISTANCE: 20 miles)
FAULT-DATA FILE USED: CDMGFLTE.DAT
MINIMUM DEPTH VALUE (km): 3.0
Page 1
Rincon Garf eqf rhga TEST.OUT
EQFAULT SUMMARY
DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS
Page 1
I APPROXIMATE !=~:~~:=~-~:-=~~:~~~~~=-=~=~:
ABBREVIATED I DISTANCE I MAXIMUM I RHGA lEST. SITE
FAULT NAME I mi (km) !EARTHQUAKE! SITE !INTENSITY I I MAG.(Mw) I ACCEL. g MOD.MERC. ================================1==============1==========1========== ========= ROSE CANYON I 4.7( 7.6)1 6.9 I 0.261 IX
NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (Offshore) 5.2( 8.4)1 6.9 I 0.250 IX
CORONADO BANK 20.6( 33.2)1 7.4 0.162 VIII
ELSINORE-TEMECULA 24.7( 39.7)1 6.8 0.085 VII
ELSINORE-JULIAN 24.9( 40.0)1 7.1 0.105 VII
ELSINORE-GLEN IVY 34.1( 54.9)1 6.8 0.057 VI
PALOS VERDES 35.6( 57.3)1 7.1 0.068 VI
EARTHQUAKE VALLEY 44.2( 71.2) 6.5 0.032 V
NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin) 46.1( 74.2) 6.9 0.042 VI
SAN JACINTO-ANZA 47.2( 76.0) 7.2 0.051 VI
SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VALLEY 47.7( 76.8) 6.9 0.040 V
CHINO-CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore) 48.0( 77.3) 6.7 0.040 V
WHITTIER 51.6( 83.0) 6.8 0.033 V
SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK 52.9( 85.1) 6.8 0.032 V
COMPTON THRUST 55.8( 89.8) 6.8 0.041 V
ELSINORE-COYOTE MOUNTAIN 58.3( 93.8) 6.8 0.028 V
ELYSIAN PARK THRUST 58.8( 94.6) 6.7 0.035 V
SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO 60.2( 96.9) 6.7 0.025 V
SAN ANDREAS -San Bernardino 65.4( 105.3) 7.3 0.036 V
SAN ANDREAS-Southern 65.4( 105.3) 7.4 0.039 V
SAN JACINTO -BORREGO 66.7( 107.3) 6.6 0.020 IV
SAN JOSE 68.9( 110.9) 6.5 0.021 IV
PINTO MOUNTAIN 72.4( 116.5)1 7.0 0.025 V
SIERRA MADRE 72.5( 116.7)1 7.0 0.030 V
CUCAMONGA 72.8( 117.2)1 7.0 0.030 V
SAN ANDREAS-Coachella 73.6( 118.4)1 7.1 0.027 V
NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (West) 76.2( 122.6)1 7.0 0.028 V
CLEGHORN 77.9( 125.4)1 6.5 0.015 IV
BURNT MTN. 78.5( 126.3)1 6.4 0.014 IV
RAYMOND 80.5( 129.6)1 6.5 0.017 IV
NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (East) 80.7( 129.9)1 6.7 0.020 IV
SAN ANDREAS-Mojave 81.0( 130.3)1 7.1 0.024 IV
SAN ANDREAS-1857 Rupture I 81.0( 130.3)1 7.8 0.041 V
EUREKA PEAK I 81.3( 130.8)1 6.4 0.013 III
CLAMSHELL-SAWPIT I 82.3( 132.5)1 6.5 0.017 IV
SUPERSTITION MTN. (San Jacinto) I 83.0( 133.6)1 6.6 0.015 IV
VERDUGO
1
1 83.1( 133.8)1 6.7 0.020 IV
HOLLYWOOD 84.9( 136.7)1 6.4 0.015 IV
ELMORE RANCH I 86.6( 139.4)1 6.6 0.014 IV
SUPERSTITION HILLS (San Jacinto)! 87.7( 141.1)1 6.6 0.014 IV
Page 2
Page 2
Rincon Garf eqf rhga TEST.OUT
DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS
J !ESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT
J APPROXIMATE ------------------------------ABBREVIATED J DISTANCE MAXIMUM RHGA EST. SITE
FAULT NAME J mi (km) EARTHQUAKE! SITE INTENSITY I MAG.(MW) I ACCEL. g MOD.MERC. ================================I============== ==========I========== ========= LANDERS I 88.2( 142.0) 7.3 I 0.025 v
HELENDALE-S. LOCKHARDT I 88.7( 142.8) 7.1 I 0.021 IV
SANTA MONICA I 89.5( 144.1) 6.6 I 0.016 IV
LAGUNA SALADA I 89.6( 144.2) 7.0 I 0.019 IV
MALIBU COAST I 92.1( 148.2) 6.7 I 0.017 IV
LENWOOD-LOCKHART-OLD WOMAN SPRGSI 92.8( 149.3) 7.3 I 0.023 IV
BRAWLEY SEISMIC ZONE I 95.8( 154.1) 6.4 I 0.011 III
JOHNSON VALLEY (Northern) I 96.0( 154.5) 6.7 I 0.014 III
NORTHRIDGE (E. oak Ridge) I 96.3( 155.0) 6.9 I 0.022 IV
EMERSON So. -COPPER MTN. I 96.5( 155.3) 6.9 I 0.016 IV
SIERRA MADRE (San Fernando) I 96.9( 156.0) 6.7 I 0.016 IV
SAN GABRIEL I 97.2( 156.4) 7.0 I 0.017 IV
ANACAPA-DUME I 98.7( 158.8) 7.3 I 0.026 v *******************************************************************************
-END OF SEARCH-53 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS.
THE ROSE CANYON FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE.
IT IS ABOUT 4.7 MILES (7.6 km) AWAY.
LARGEST MAXIMUM-EARTHQUAKE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.2610 g
Page 3
CALIFORNIA FAULT MAP
Rincon Garfield eqfTest Run
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
-100~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~WL~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600
APPEND/XC
IIAOD/FIED MERCALL/ INTENSITY SCALE OF 1931
(Excerpted flrom the California Division of Conservation Division of Mines
and Geology DMG Note 32)
The first scale to reflect earthquake intensities was developed by deRossi of Italy, and Forel of Switzerland, in the 1880s, and is known
as the Rossi-Forel Scale. This scale, with values from I to X, was used for about two decades. A need for a more refined scale
increased with the advancement of the science of seismology, and in 1902, the Italian seismologist Mercalli devised a new scale on a I
to XII range. The Mercalli Scale was modified in 1931 by American seismologists Harry 0. Wood and Frank Neumann to take into
account modern structural features.
The Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale measures the intensity of an earthquake's effects in a given locality, and is perhaps much more
meaningful to the layman because it is based on actual observations of earthquake effects at specific places. It should be noted that
because the damage used for assigning intensities can be obtained only from direct firsthand reports, considerable time --weeks or
months --is sometimes needed before an intensity map can be assembled for a particular earthquake.
On the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale, values range from I to XII. The most commonly used adaptation covers the range of intensity
from the conditions of "I --not felt except by very few, favorably situated," to 'XII --damage total, lines of sight disturbed, objects
thrown into the air." While an earthquake has only one magnitude, it can have many intensities, which decrease with distance from the
epicenter.
It is difficult to compare magnitude and intensity because intensity is linked with the particular ground and structural conditions of a
given area, as well as distance from the earthquake epicenter, while magnitude depends on the energy released at the focus of the
earthquake.
I Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable circumstances.
II Felt only by a few persons at rest, especially on upper floors of buildings. Delicately suspended objects may swing.
Ill Felt quite noticeably indoors, especially on upper floors of buildings, but many people do not recognize it as an earthquake.
Standing motor cars may rock slightly. Vibration like passing of truck. Duration estimated.
IV During the day felt indoors by many, outdoors by few. At night some awakened. Dishes, windows, doors disturbed; walls make
cracking sound. Sensation like heavy truck striking building. Standing motor cars rocked noticeably.
v Felt by nearly everyone, many awakened. Some dishes, windows, etc., broken; a few instances of cracked plaster; unstable
objects overturned. Disturbances of trees, poles, and other tall objects sometimes noticed. Pendulum clocks may stop.
VI Felt by all, many frightened and run outdoors. Some heavy furniture moved; a few instances of fallen plaster or damaged
chimneys. Damage slight.
VII Everybody runs outdoors. Damage negligible in building of good design and construction; slight to moderate in well-built
ordinary structures; considerable in poorly built or badly designed structures; some chimneys broken. Noticed by persons driving
motorcars.
VIII Damage slight in specially designed structures; considerable in ordinary substantial buildings, with partial collapse; great in
poorly built structures. Panel walls thrown out of frame structures. Fall of chimneys, factory stacks, columns, monuments, walls.
Heavy furniture overturned. Sand and mud ejected in small amounts. Changes in well water. Persons driving motor cars
disturbed.
IX Damage considerable in specially designed structures; well-designed frame structures thrown out of plumb; great in substantial
buildings with partial collapse. Buildings shifted off foundations. Ground cracked conspicuously. Underground pipes broken.
X Some well-built wooden structures destroyed; most masonry and frame structures destroyed with foundations; ground badly
cracked. Rails bent. Landslides considerable from riverbanks and steep slopes. Shifted sand and mud. Water splashed (slopped)
over banks.
XI Few, if any, masonry structures remain standing. Bridges destroyed. Broad fissures in ground. Underground pipelines
completely out of service. Earth slumps and land slips in soft ground. Rails bent greatly.
XII Damage total. Practically all works of construction are damaged greatly or destroyed. Waves seen on ground surface. Lines of
sight and level are distorted. Objects thrown upward into the air.
APPENDIX D
USGS DES11GN MAPS SUMMARY REPORT
EUSGS Design Maps Summary Report
User-Specified Input
Report Title 3806 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA
Tue March 10,2015 17:26:27 UTC
Building Code Reference Document ASCE 7-10 Standard
(which utilizes USGS hazard data available in 2008)
Site Coordinates 33.1497°N, 117.3447°W
Site Soil Classification Site Class D-"Stiff Soil"
Risk Category I/11/III
2mi t::===~=:::JI sooom
USGS-Provided Output
S5 = 1.158 g
sl = 0.444 g
SMS = 1.201 g
SMl = 0.691 g
-
S05 = 0.800 g
5 01 = 0.461 g
' . .;:.'
® NapQuest
For information on how the SS and Sl values above have been calculated from probabilistic (risk-targeted) and
deterministic ground motions in the direction of maximum horizontal response, please return to the application and
select the "2009 NEHRP" building code reference document.
-1:11 -II Ul
MCE .• Response Spectrum
1.43
1.30
1.11
1.04
0.91
0.1S
0.65
0.52
0.3!11
0.2!;
0.13
0.00 4---t--+-+---+--+--+---+--+--t---1
o.oo 0.20 o.4o o.6o o.eo 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.so 2.oo
Period, T (sed
-1:11 -II Ul
0.90·
O.Bl
0.12
0.!;3
0.54
0.45
0.27
0.19
O.O:'l
Design Response Spectrum
0.00 +-----1--t--+---1--+-+--+--+--1---1
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 O.BO 1.00 1.20 1.40 l.GO l.BO 2.00
Period, T (sed
For PGAw TL, CR5, and CR1 values, please view the detailed report.
Although this information is a product of the U.S. Geological Survey, we provide no warranty, expressed or implied, as·to the
accuracy of the data contained therein. This tool is not a substitute for technical subject-matter knowledge.
IIUSGS Design Maps Detailed Report
ASCE 7-10 Standard (33.1497°N, 117.3447°W)
Site Class D -"Stiff Soil", Risk Category !/II/III
Section 11.4.1 -Mapped Acceleration Parameters
Note: Ground motion values provided below are for the direction of maximum horizontal
spectral response acceleration. They have been converted from corresponding geometric
mean ground motions computed by the USGS by applying factors of 1.1 (to obtain 55) and
1.3 (to obtain 51). Maps in the 2010 ASCE-7 Standard are provided for Site Class B.
Adjustments for other Site Classes are made, as needed, in Section 11.4.3.
From Figure 22-1 £lJ Ss = 1.158 g
From Figure 22-2£21 51 = 0.444 g
Section 11.4.2-Site Class
The authority having jurisdiction (not the USGS), site-specific geotechnical data, and/or the
default has classified the site as Site Class D, based on the site soil properties in accordance
with Chapter 20.
Table 20.3-1 Site Classification
Site Class
A. Hard Rock >5,000 ft/s N/A N/A
B. Rock 2,500 to 5,000 ftjs N/A N/A
-·---~----------r~ . ..._..-~--~-----~,~-~~----~---·--~---.....-~---~--,.._.----c. Very dense soil and soft rock 1,200 to 2,500 ft/s >50 >2,000 psf
----~·---~~-~-~-----~-~---~·--~""--·-~~~------~ .. '-""""-----~·---~----~-=-----~~----~~-------~~----~------~-
0. Stiff Soil 600 to 1,200 ftjs 15 to 50 1,000 to 2,000 psf
E. Soft clay soil <600 ftjs <15 <1,000 psf
Any profile with more than 10ft of soil having the
characteristics:
• Plasticity index PI > 20,
• Moisture content w ~ 40%, and
• Undrained shear strength S0 < 500 psf
~-~-~~~---~~--------------·-~---~------~~·-~·~o,_. ~----<·---~--------·--------~-----------~------~---~'"" -~--~-
F. Soils requiring site response See Section 20.3.1
analysis in accordance with Section
21.1
For SI: lft/s = 0.3048 m/s llb/ft2 = 0.0479 kN/m 2
Section 11.4.3 -Site Coefficients and Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake
C.M.~.~.B.) Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters
Table 11.4-1: Site Coefficient Fa
Site Class Mapped MCE R Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at Short Period
S5 :::; 0.25 S5 = 0.50 S5 = 0.75 S5 = 1.00 S5 2:: 1.25
A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
c 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0
D 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 ]
E 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.9
F See Section 11.4. 7 of ASCE 7
Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of S5
For Site Class = D and 5 5 = 1.158 g, Fa = 1.037
Table 11.4-2: Site Coefficient Fv
Site Class Mapped MCE R Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at 1-s Period
S1 :::; 0.10 S1 = 0.20 sl = o.3o sl = 0.40 sl ;:::: o.5o
A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
c 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3
D 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5
E 3.5 3.2 2.8 2.4 2.4
F See Section 11.4. 7 of ASCE 7
Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of S1
For Site Class = D and 51 = 0.444 g, Fv = 1.556
Equation (11.4-1): SMs = FaSs = 1.037 X 1.158 = 1.201 g
Equation (11.4-2): SMl = FvSl = 1.556 X 0.444 = 0.691 g
Section 11.4.4 -Design Spectral Acceleration Parameters
Equation (11.4-3): 5 0s = % SMs = %X 1.201 = 0.800 g
Equation (11.4-4): SDl = % SMl = %X 0.691 = 0.461 g
Section 11.4.5-Design Response Spectrum
From Figure 22-12 [31 TL = 8 seconds
Figure 11.4-1: Design Response Spectrum
-1:11 -ra !II
i i ..
Ill "ii ~
Ill Ul c 0 1:1. Ul Ill
" ii .. t Ill 1:1. !II
S;J';, = 0.800
sell= 0.461
I
I ! --r----------,----------
' I I
T;,=0.576 1.000
T < T0 : S,. = $1:15 ( 0.4 + 0.6TIT0 )
TD:i!iT :5 T&: sa =S~
T$ < T :5 TL: s. =Sill 1 T
T > TL : s. :: Sill T~.l T~
Period, T (sed
Section 11.4.6-Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) Response
Spectrum
The MCER Response Spectrum is determined by multiplying the design response spectrum above
by 1.5.
'i Sl'!s = 1.201
II Ill
c D i .! II .., ..,
<
" Ill c c G. Ill " l:r:
ii .. t " G. Ill
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
--~----------t---------
T0 = 0.115
1
I
I
Ts = 0.575 1.000
Period, T (sec)
Section 11.8.3 -Additional Geotechnical Investigation Report Requirements for Seismic
Design Categories D through F
From Figure 22-7 £41 PGA = 0.462
Equation (11.8-1): PGAM = FPGAPGA = 1.038 X 0.462 = 0.479 g
Table 11.8-1: Site Coefficient FPGA
Site Mapped MCE Geometric Mean Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA
Class
PGA ::5 0.10 PGA = 0.20 PGA = 0.30 PGA = 0.40 PGA <:: 0.50
A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
c 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0
D 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0
E 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.9
F See Section 11.4. 7 of ASCE 7
Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of PGA
For Site Class = D and PGA = 0.462 g, FPGA = 1.038
Section 21.2.1.1 -Method 1 (from Chapter 21 -Site-Specific Ground Motion Procedures for
Seismic Design)
From Figure 22-17 £SJ CRs = 0.935
From Figure 22-18£61 CR1 = 0.988
Section 11.6 -Seismic Design Category
Table 11.6-1 Seismic Design Category Based on Short Period Response Acceleration Parameter
RISK CATEGORY
VALUE OF S 05 I or II III IV
S 05 < 0.167g A A A
0.167g :S S 05 < 0.33g B B c
0.33g S S 05 < O.SOg c c D
O.SOg :S S05 D D D
For Risk Category = I andl S05 = 0.800 g, Seismic Design Category = D
Table 11.6-2 Seismic Design Category Based on 1-S Period Response Acceleration Parameter
RISK CATEGORY
VALUE OF S 01 I or II III IV
S01 < 0.067g A A A
0.067g :S S01 < 0.133g B B c
0.133g :S S 01 < 0.20g c c D
0.20g :S S01 D D D
For Risk Category = I and S01 = 0.461 g, Seismic Design Category = D
Note: When S1 is greater than or equal to 0.75g, the Seismic Design Category is E for
buildings in Risk Categories I, II, and III, and F for those in Risk Category IV, irrespective of
the above.
Seismic Design Category = "the more severe design category in accordance with
Table 11.6-1 or 11.6-2" = D
Note: See Section 11.6 for alternative approaches to calculating Seismic Design Category.
References
1. Figure 22-1: http://earthquake.usgs.govjhazardsjdesignmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE-7 _Figure_22-l.pdf
2. Figure 22-2: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/down loads/pdfs/20 1 O_ASCE-7 _Figure_22-2.pdf
3. Figure 22-12: http://earthquake,usgs.gov/hazards/designmapsjdown loads/pdfs/201 O_ASCE-7 _Figure_22-
12.pdf
4. Figure 22-7: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/down loads/pdfs/20 1 O_ASCE-7 _Figure_22-7 .pdf
5. Figure 22-17: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmapsjdownloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE-7 _Figure_22-
17.pdf
6. Figure 22-18: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmapsjdownloadsjpdfs/201 O_ASCE-7 _Figure_22-
18.pdf
November 17, 2015
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Austin Silva, Assistant Planner
Van Lynch, Principal Planner
Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary
Sabrina Michelson, Senior Office Specialist
Cecelia Fernandez, Office Specialist
Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect
Landscape .A.rchitectural Review-Conceptual Review -3rd Review
Garfield Custom Beach Homes-PUD 15-17, SDP 15-16, CDP 15-34, MS 15-
11
Garfield Street @ Hemlock A venue
MELA file: 603 -Garfield Custom Beach Homes-Con3
Landscape Architect: GMP, Phone: (858) 558-8997
All previous comments have been satisfactorily addressed.
October 14, 2015
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Austin Silva, Assistant Planner
Van Lynch, Principal Planner
Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary
Sabrina Michelson, Senior Office Specialist
Cecelia Fernandez, Office Specialist
Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect
Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -2nd Review
Garfield Custom Beach Homes-PUD 15-17, SDP 15-16, CDP 15-34, MS 15-
11
Garfield Street @ Hemlock A venue
MELA file: 603 -Garfield Custom Beach Homes-Con2
Landscape Architect: GMP, Phone: (858) 558-8997
Please advise the applicant to make the following revisions to the plans so that they will meet the
requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual.
Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the
area of the comment concern.
REPEAT COMMENTS
1-8 Completed.
9. Provide a minimum ofone street tree for e>,rery 40' ofstreet frontage. Trees may be
planted on center or grouped. Trees shall be selected from the approved tree replacement
list identified in Chapter 6 of the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, unless
approved otherwise. Street trees shall be located:
a. Completed.
b. In areas that do not conflict with public utilities. 2nd Review: There are
overhead utility lines along Hemlock Avenue. Please select a street tree that will
not cause conflicts with the utility.
c-d Completed.
10. The plan shall provide that "only low volume or subsurface irrigation shall be used to
irrigate any vegetation within twenty-four inches of an impermeable surface unless the
adjacent impermeable surfaces are designed and constructed to cause water to drain
entirely into a landscaped area". 2nd Review: The applicant has responded: "Primarily
drip irrigation will be used on the property and all hardscape areas shall drain into an
adjacent planting area. " Portions of the public sidewalks and driveway aprons will
drain to the street. Please add the underlined portion of the comment above as a note on
the plans.
11. RETURN RED LINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water
conservation) for the next submittal. Please provide a written respons1e to all
comments clearly indicating where and how each comment was addressed.
DATE: AUGUST 3, 2015
CITY OF CARLSBAD
REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO
*ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS
PROJECT NO(S): PUD 15-17/SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11 REVIEW NO: 1
PROJECT TITLE: GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
APPLICANT: DUNN KEVIN
TO:
[gJ Land Development Engineering
[gJ Police Department-J. Sasway
[gJ Fire Department-Greg Ryan
0 Public Works (Storm Drain)-Clayton Dobbs
0 Public Works (Wastewater)-Don Wasko
0 Public Works (Water)-Eric Sanders
[gJ Building Division-Will Foss 0 Water/Sewer District
0 Parks & Recreation (Parks/Trails)-Liz Ketabian
D Parks & Recreation (Trees & Medians)-Kyle Lancaster
0 Public Works Department (Streets)
0 Public Works Department (Traffic)-John Kim
0 Public Works Department (Design)-David Ahles
0 SANDAG (Any huge/major development)
401 B. Street, Suite 800, San Diego CA 92101-4231
FROM: PLANNING DIVISION
[gJ Landscape Plancheck Consultant-PELA
D School District
0 North County Transit District-Planning Dept.
0 Sempra Energy-Land Management
0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5)
State of California Dept. of Transportation
Planning Division, ATIN: Jacob Armstrong
4050 Taylor Street, MS 240
San Diego, CA 92110
Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the TRACKING DESK in LDE at 1635 Faraday
Avenue, by 8/24/15. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that
need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the
applicant and/or their represen1tatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know.
Thank you c-·
COMMENTS:. ________ ~/--~-~-~---~~~~~~(~~~Ul~----------------------------
Signature I I Date
PLANS ATIACHED
Review & Comment 8/14
CITY OF
Memorandum
September 1, 2015
To: Austin Silva, Project Planner
From: David Rick, Project Engineer
Via: Jason Geldert, City Engineer
Re: MS 15-11/PUID 15-17/SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34 GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
COMPLETE
Land Development Engineering has completed a review of the above-referenced project for
completeness and engineering issues of concern. All items needed for engineering review are
provided for determiningthe application as complete. Engineering issues which need to be
resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a determination on the proposed
project are as follows:
1. On sheet AO.O and sheet 1 of 2 of the civil plans, provide the amount of proposed
impervious area for the project, including any impervious sidewalk or driveway in the
public right-of-way. This information is needed to determine whether the project is
defined as a Priority Development project (PDP) or not. If more than 5,000 square feet
of impervious area is proposed, the project will be subject to PDP requirements and
standard storm water quality requirements per the BMP Design Manual. PDP's require
submittal of a Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) with numerically sized
BMP's will be required. If less than 5,000 square feet of impervious area is proposed,
just standard storm water quality requirements through the use of Low Impact
Development (LID) will apply.
Since standard storm water quality requirements will apply either way, add additional
LID by directing driveway drainage through the yard before discharging to the street
and/or adding adequate pervious area to the driveway. The public sidewalk to be added
per the attached red lined comments on the plans shall be non-contiguous with the curb.
This design will allow for sidewalk runoff to discharge to the parkway before entering
the public drainage system.
2. City Standard GS-15 requires that drainage from the building foundation be established
at a 2% positive grade a minimum of five feet from the building foundation. A lesser
distance requires city engineer approval. The city engineer will not approve a lesser
distance without a letter from a registered soils engineer supporting a lesser distance.
Please provide such a letter or revise the pl?ns to comply with City standard GS-15.
Community & Economic Development
1635 Faraday Ave. I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-602-2710 I 760-602-8560 fax I www.carlsbadca.gov
MS 15-11
September 1, 2015
Page 2
3. On section B-B, plot the limits of the projected three foot over excavation 5 feet beyond
the building footprint and show how it excavation can occur without impacting the
existing retaining wall abutting the southerly property line. Also, plot the backfill
material and drains required per detail SDRSD C-8. The wall shall be located far enough
from the property line so that all backfill material, drains and excavation can be
constructed on the subject property.
4. Plot proposed 5-foot wide public sidewalk three feet from the curb along the project
frontage on Hemlock Avenue. Transition sidewalk back to the curb at the easterly and
westerly terminus. Construct 5 foot wide sidewalk behind the driveway instead of a
four foot width per SDRSD G-14C. Show proposed dedication of three foot wide
pedestrian access easement to accommodate said sidewalk behind the driveway.
5. Add the sewer invert elevation at the point of connection between the lateral and sewer
main for House #2.
6. Per Map 1747 and the title report which does not list any additional easement or ROW
dedications, the right-of-way width does appear to be 50 feet as indicated on the plan.
However, the assessors page 204-270-04 shows that the ROW width of all of Hemlock
Avenue is 60 feet. This appears to be an error. Please research further to verify that the
right-of-way is 50 feet and not 60 feet per the assessor page.
7. Address comments on redlined plans.
If you or the applicant has any questions, please either see or contact me at 602-2781.
DAVID RICK
Associate Engineer
Land Development Engineering
Attachment: redlined plans
DATE: AUGUST 3, 2015
CITY OF CARLSBAD
REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO
*ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS
PUD 15-17/SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11 REVIEW NO: --------~-------~------~---------------PROJECT NO(S): 1
PROJECT TITLE: GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
APPLICANT: DUNN KEVIN
TO:
rg] Land Development Engineering
rg] Police Department-J. Sasway
rg] Fire Department-Greg Ryan
0 Public Works (Storm Drain)-Clayton Dobbs
0 Public Works (Wastewater)-Don Wasko
0 Public Works (Water)-Eric Sanders
rg] Building Division-Will Foss 0 Water/Sewer District
0 Parks & Recreation (Parks/Trails)-Liz Ketabian
0 Parks & Recreation (Trees & Medians)-Kyle Lancaster
0 Public Works Department (Streets)
0 Public Works Department (Traffic)-John Kim
0 Public Works Department (Design)-David Ahles
0 SANDAG (Any huge/major development)
401 B. Street, Suite 800, San Diego CA 92101-4231
FROM: PLANNING DIVISION
rg] Landscape Plancheck Consultant-PELA
0 School District
0 North County Transit District-Planning Dept.
0 Sempra Energy-Land Management
0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5)
State of California Dept. of Transportation
Planning Division, ATIN: Jacob Armstrong
4050 Taylor Street, MS 240
San Diego, CA 92110
Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the TRACKING DESK in LDE at 1635 Faraday
Avenue, by 8/24/15. If you have ''No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that
need to be submitted to deem tlhe application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the
applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know.
Thank you ).._ d 1
COMMENTS: ~=1~A~;:>
Date
PLANS ATTACHED
Review & Comment 8/14
CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
Discretionary Review Checklist
PROJECT NUMBER: COP 15-34/ PUD 15-17/ SOP 15-16/ MS 15-11 Garfield Custom Bch
Homes
BUILDING ADDRESS: 3806 GARFIELD ST ------·------------------------------------------------------
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demo existing SFR, build 2, 3-story SFR's w/ Condo ownership
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 204-270-04-00
FIRE DEPARTMENT
APPROVAL
The item you have submitted for review has been
approved. The approval is based on plans, information
and/or specifications provided in your submittal;
therefore, any changes to these items after this date,
including field modifications, must be reviewed by this
office to insure continued conformance with applicable
codes. Please review carefully all comments attached,
as failure to comply with instructions in this report can
result in suspension of permit to build.
By: G. Ryan Date: 08.18.2015
ATTACHMENTS
COMMENTS
DENIAL
Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with
lR1. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications
for compliance with applicable codes and standards.
Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office
for review.
By: _________ Date:
By: _________ Date:
By: __________ Date:
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON
NAME: Gregory L Ryan
ADDRESS: 1635 Faraday Ave
Carlsbad, CA 92008
PHONE: (760) 602-4665
DATE:
PROJECT NO(S):
PROJECT TITLE:
APPLICANT:
TO:
AUGUST 3, 2015
CITY OF CARLSBAD
REVIEW AND COMMENT MEMO
*ALWAYS SEND EXHIBITS
PUD 15-17/SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11 REVIEW NO: 1
GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
DUNN KEVIN
0 Public Works (Storm Drain)-Clayton Dobbs
0 Public Works (Wastewater)-Don Wasko
D Public Works (Water)-Eric Sanders
0 Land Development Engineering
0 Police Department-J. Sasway
0 Fire Department-Greg Ryan
0 Building Division-Will Foss D Water/Sewer District
0 Parks & Recreation (Parks/Trails)-Liz Ketabian
D Parks & Recreation (Trees & Medians)-Kyle Lancaster
0 Public Works Department (Streets)
0 Public Works Department (Traffic) -John Kim
0 Public Works Department (Design)-David Ahles
0 SANDAG (Any huge/major development)
401 B. Street, Suite 800, San Diego CA 92101-4231
FROM: PLANNING DIVISION
0 Landscape Plancheck Consultant-PELA
D School District
D North County Transit District-Planning Dept.
0 Sempra Energy-Land Management
0 Caltrans (Send anything adjacent to 1-5)
State of California Dept. ofTransportation
Planning Division, ATIN: Jacob Armstrong
4050 Taylor Street, MS 240
San Diego, CA 92110
Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the TRACKING DESK in LDE at 1635 Faraday
Avenue, by 8/24/15. If you have "No Comments," please so state. If you determine that there are items that
need to be submitted to deem the application "complete" for processing, please immediately contact the
applicant and/or their representatives (via phone or e-mail) to let them know.
Thank you ~ {\ /<Z><"?A.I MJ!.f .,_,.. L.,.
COMMENTS:. ______ 1V __ U _____ L/ __ V~ __ vv_f __ v~ __ vvV~~~----------------------------------
PLANS ATIACHED
Review & Comment 8/14
August 10, 2015
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Chris Garcia, Junior Planner
Don N eu, Planning Director
Bridget Desmarais, Administrative Secretary
Sabrina Michelson, Senior Office Specialist
Cecelia Fernandez, Office Specialist
Michael Elliott, City of Carlsbad's Contract Landscape Architect
Landscape Architectural Review -Conceptual Review -1st Review
Garfield Custom Beach Homes -PUD 15-17, SDP 15-16, CDP 15-34, MS 15-
11
Garfield Street @ Hemlock A venue
MELA file: 603 -Garfield Custom Beach Homes -Conl
Landscape Architect: GMP, Phone: (858) 558-8997
Please advise the applicant to make the following revisions to the plans so that they will meet the
requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual.
Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the
area of the comment concern.
1. Please verify fence maximum heights allowed within the front yard setback with the city
project planner. The fence heights may need to be reduced to 42".
2. Please address landscaping of all areas including the parkway. Indicate if the turf and
palm are to remain. See comment number 9 if the palm is to be removed.
3. Please show and label all property lines, and right-of-ways on the plans.
4. The plan shall demonstrate that plants, when installed and at maturity, will be positioned
to avoid obstructing motorists' views of pedestrian crossings, driveways, roadways and
other vehicular travel ways. Please verify with the city Engineering Division if this is a
collector street or larger. If a collector street or larger, landscape elements over 30 inches
in height (including planting measured at maturity) as measured from adjacent street
grade are not permitted at street corners within a triangular zone drawn from two points,
25 feet outward from the beginning of curves. Please address.
5. Generally identify all existing woody plant material to be removed or retained. Trees
over 12" in caliper diameter shall be identified on the plan individually as to caliper size
and type and labeled to be retained or removed. It appears that there may be trees that are
larger than 12" in caliper. Please clarify which specific trees are to remain ..
6. Please address maintenance of the parkway and add the area to the total landscape area
square footage.
7 .. Should the fence be located on top of the retaining wall? Please review.
8. The Landscape Manual indicates that landscape plans are to feature ground cover, shrubs,
and trees to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. The
Landscape Manual also indicates that landscaping shall be used to accentuate and
enhance architecture. Please provide vertical evergreen trees along the north, south, east
and west sides of the buildings to both soften and enhance the elevations.
Garfield Custom Beach Homes
Conceptual Plan Review
August 10, 2015
Page2
9. Provide a minimum of one street tree for every 40' of street frontage. Trees may be
planted on center or grouped. Trees shall be selected from the approved tree replacement
list identified in Chapter 6 of the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, unless
approved otherwise. Street trees shall be located:
a. A minimum of seven (7) feet from any sewer line.
b. In areas that do not conflict with public utilities.
c. Outside of sight distance areas.
d. A minimum of three (3) feet outside the public right of way, unless approved
otherwise by the City.
10. The plan shall provide that only low volume or subsurface irrigation shall be used to
irrigate any vegetation within twenty-four inches of an impermeable surface unless the
adjacent impermeable surfaces are designed and constructed to cause water to drain
entirely into a landscaped area.
11. RETURN RED LINES and provide 2 copies of an plans (concept, water
conservation) for the next submittal. Please provide a written respons,e to all
comments dearly indicating where and how each comment was addressed.
Memorandum
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
August 7, 2015
Planning Tracking Desk-Planning Department
Jodee Sasway, Police
Garfield Custom Beach Homes-PUD 15-17
Plan Review Recommendations
{'city of
Carlsbad
The City of Carlsbad Police Department's Crime Prevention Unit has provided the following
optimal security recommendations. The purpose of this document is to safeguard property and
public welfare by regulating and reviewing the design, construction, quality of materials, use and
occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures. The standards used in this
document represent model international standards.
Crime Prevention through Environmental Design
The proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear
and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life. The proper design influences
this by positively affecting human behavior. The design includes the physical environment, the
planned behavior of people, the productive use of space and an effective crime/loss prevention
program.
Natural Surveillance
• Place and design physical features to maximize visibility. This will include building
orientation, windows, entrances, walkways, landscape trees and shrubs, fences and any
other physical obstruction.
• Design the placement of persons and or activities to maximize surveillance possibilities.
• Design lighting that provides for appropriate nighttime illumination of walkways,
entrances and driveways.
Natural Access Control
• Use walkways, pavement, lighting and landscaping to clearly guide guests to and from
selected entrances.
• Use real or symbolic barriers like fences or landscaping to prevent and or discourage
access to or from dark and or unmonitored areas.
Provisions for territorial reinforcement
Police Department
Community Relations I 2560 Orion Way I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760-931-2105 t
www.carlsbadca.gov/police I www.facebook.com/carlsbadpolicedepartment I @carlsbadpolice
• Use pavement treatments, landscaping and fences to define and outline ownership or
property.
Lighting
• Equip building on all sides with light fixtures.
• All types of exterior doors should be illuminated during the hours of darkness.
• Install lights on the building in the eaves to illuminate the perimeter of the house.
• Choose light fixtures with dawn to dusk sensors or timers not motion sensors.
Landscaping
• Plan a landscaping design that enhances surveillance and security.
• Tree canopies should be no lower than six {6) feet and should not allow access to roofs
or balconies.
• Ensure landscaping plan does not deter from lighting and addressing.
• Plant only low profile shrubs that can be maintained below two {2) feet.
• Use security plants where necessary to prevent entering and tampering.
• Install walls and fences that are see-through and enhance surveillance.
• Install lockable gates that allow surveillance.
Addressing
• Locate numerals where they are clearly visible from the front street
• Contrast the numeral's color to the background on which it is affixed.
• Numerals shall be no less than four {4) inches in height and illuminated during the hours
of darkness.
Entrances
• Design front entrances to provide vision from the front door to the front access street.
• Keep entranceways clear of clutter.
• Avoid the use of courtyards that separate the resident from the front street.
Doors
• Do not use of glass within 42 inches of a locking device.
• A single or double door shall be equipped with a double cylinder deadbolt with a bolt
projection exceeding one inch or a hook-shaped or expanding deadbolt that engages the
strike sufficiently to prevent spreading. The dead bolt lock shall have a minimum of five-
pin tumblers and a cylinder guard.
• Install wooden doors of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of one and
three-fourths (1-3/4) inches.
• Provide a double door inactive leaf with metal flush bolts having a minimum
embedment of five-·eighths (5/8) of an inch into the header and footer of the
doorframe.
Strike Plates
• Reinforce all deadbolt strike plates. Choose Strike plates constructed of a minimum 16
U.S. gauge steel, bronze, or brass and secure it to the jamb by a minimum oftwo
Viewer
screws, which should penetrate at least two (2) inches into the solid backing beyond the
surface to which thE~ strike is attached. Re-enforcement of the door area around the lock
is also suggested.
• Arrange entrance doors so that the occupant has a view of the area immediately outside
the door without opening the door. Except doors requiring a fire protection rating that
prohibits them, such a view may be provided by a door viewer having a field of view of
not less than 190 degrees. Mounting height should not exceed fifty-four (54) inches
from the floor.
Windows and sliding glass doors
• All exterior sliding glass doors and windows should be equipped with locking devices
which will keep the sliding panel of the door or window from being opened from the
outside horizontally or vertically.
• Ensure windows have security features preventing the window from being forced to
slide or rise.
• Consider security glazing.
This information is a representation of information gathered on a national level. The purpose is
to provide effective and consistent information. If you would like additional assistance
concerning building security, please contact the Crime Prevention Unit at (760) 931-2105.
By Jodee Sasway, Community Relations Manager
Crime Prevention and Public Information
760-931-2195 or jodee.sasway@carlsbadca.gov
January 7, 2016
Kevin Dunn
RREG Investments, LLC
3005 S El Camino Real
San Clemente CA 92672
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOTICE OF DECISION
City of
Carlsbad
SUBJECT: PUD 15-17/SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11-GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
At the January 6, 2016 Planning Commission meeting, your application was considered. The Commission
voted 6-0 to approve your request. The decision of the Planning Commission is final on the date of
adoption unless a written appeal to the City Council is filed with the City Clerk within ten (10} calendar
days in accordance with the provisions of Carlsbad Municipal Code section 21.54.150. The written appeal
must specify the reason or reasons for the appeal.
If you have any questions regarding your application, please contact your project planner Austin Silva at
(760} 602-4631 or austin.silva(wcarlsbadca.gov.
Sincerely,
DON NEU, AICP
City Planner
DN:AS:bd
c: Steve Shackleton, 1106 2nd St., Ste 359, Encinitas, CA 92024
File
enc: Planning Commission Resolution No. 7144
Community&
Planning Division j1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-73141 760-602-4600 \760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov
December 15, 2015
Kevin Dunn
RREG Investments, LLC
3005 S El Camino Real
San Clemente CA 92672
Icy of
Carlsbad
SUBJECT: PUD 15-17 /SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11-GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project will be sent to you via email on Wednesday,
December 23, 2015. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating
Committee (DCC) meeting which will be held on December 29, 2015. A twenty (20} minute appointment has
been set aside for you at 9:00. If you have any questions concerning your project you shoul'd attend the DCC
meeting.
It is necessary that you bring the following required information with you to this meeting or provide it to your
planner prior to the meeting in order for your project to go forward to the Planning Commission:
1. Unmounted colored exhibit(s) of your site plan and elevations. For residential projects of 2 or more
homes a typical street s,cene of the elevations shall be provided. The corresponding rear elevations
for the homes shown for the typical street scene shall also be provided; and
2. A PDF of your colored site plan and elevations.
The colored exhibits must be submitted at this time to ensure review by the Planning Commission at their
briefings. If the colored exhibits are not available for their review, your project could be rescheduled to a later
time. The PDF of your colored site plan and elevations will be used in the presentation to the Planning
Commission and the public at the Planning Commission Hearing. If you do not plan to attend this meeting,
please make arrangements to have your colored exhibit(s) and the PDF here by the scheduled time above.
Should you wish to use visual materials in your presentation to the Planning Commission, they should be
submitted to the Planning Division no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of a Regular Planning Commission
Meeting. Digital materials will be placed on a computer in Council Chambers for public presentations. Please
label all materials with the agenda item number you are representing. Items submitted for viewing, including
presentations/digital materials, will be included in the time limit maximum for speakers. All materials exhibited
to the Planning Commission during the meeting (slides, maps, photos, etc.) are part of the public record and
must be kept by the Planning Division for at least 60 days after final action on the matter. Your materials will be
returned upon written request.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact your Planner, Austin Silva at (760) 602-
4631 or at austin.silva@carlsbadca.gov.
Sincerely,
DON NEU, AICP
City Planner
DN:AS:bd
c: Steve Shackleton, 1106 2nd St., Ste 359, Encinitas, CA 92024
File Copy
David Rick, Project Engineer
Data Entry_ Community & l:conomk
Planning Division 11635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-73141760-602-4600 1760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov
November 20, 2015
Kevin Dunn
3005 S. El Camino Real
San Clemente, CA 92672
SUBJECT: PUD 15-17/SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11-GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
Dear Kevin,
The City has completed its review of the Garfield Custom Beach Homes project, which was most recently
submitted on November 12, 2015. No further issues were raised during this review period.
Staff has tentatively scheduled the project for the Planning Commission meeting held on January 6,
2015. A letter will follow announcing a tentative hearing date and also requesting fina~ exhibits and a
public noticing package.
Please contact me at (760) 602-4631, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss
the application.
Sincerely,
;U{J
AUSTIN SILVA, AICP
Associate Planner
AS:bd
c: Steve Shackelton, 1106 2nd Street, Ste. 359, Encinitas, CA 92024
Van Lynch, Team Leader
David Rick, Project Engineer
File Copy
Community&
Planning Division 11635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-73141760-602-4600 1760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov
RINCOI\1
REAL ESTATE GROUP
November 4, 2015
Austin Silva, AICP
Associate Planner
P: 760-602-4631
City of Carlsbad
Planning Division
Re: PUD 15-17/CDP 15-34/SDP 15-16/MS 15-11
Austin:
In response to the second review letter dated November 3, 2015, we would like to request
a 90 day application extension for PUD 15-17 /CDP 15-34/SDP 15-16/MS 15-11 -
Garfield Custom Homes.
Sincerely,
RREG Investments Series, LLC Series IO 19
By: Kevin Dunn
It's: Managing Member
949-637-3254
1520 N El Camino Real Unit 5, San Clemente, CA 926721 P: 949-637-32541 F: 888-634-0420
WWW.RINCONGRP.COM I DRE LICENSE# 01495690 I GC License# 934521
November 3, 2015
Kevin Dunn
3005 South El Camino Real
San Clemente, CA 92672
-\~~ JeJl II/ 3 I Js-
1 Cityof
Carlsbad
SUBJECT: PUD 15-17/SDP 15-16/CDP 15-34/MS 15-11-GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
Dear Mr. Dunn,
Your project was deemed complete on September 1, 2015. There are issues of concern with the project
that remain to be resolved. The issues are listed on the attached page(s). All issues will need to be
resolved prior to scheduling the project for a public hearing.
Please contact me at (760) 602-4631, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss
the application.
Sincerely,
!M(/
AUSTIN SILVA, AICP
Associate Planner
AS:fn
c: Steve Shackelton, Suite 359, 1106 2nd Street, Encinitas, CA 92024
Van Lynch, Principal Planner
David Rick, Project Engineer
File Copy
Data Entry
Community & Development
Planning Division j1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314j760-602-4600 1760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov
ISSUES OF CONCERN
Planning:
1. Per the letter sent to you dated October 6, 2015, please submit in letter form, a request for a one-
time 90 day application extension. All issues should have been addressed by October 22, 2015, in
order to be scheduled for the December 2"d Planning Commission meeting to be consistent with the
State Permit Streamlining Act (California Government Code Section 65950).
Engineering:
2. Please address the red-lined comments on the attached plan.
Landscape:
Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of
the comment concern.
REPEAT COMMENTS
1-8 Completed.
9. Provide a minimum of one street tree for every 40' of street frontage. Trees may be planted on
center or grouped. Trees shall be selected from the approved tree replacement list identified in
Chapter 6 of the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, unless approved otherwise. Street
trees shall be located:
a. Completed.
b. In areas that do not conflict with public utilities. 2nd Review: There are overhead utility
lines along Hemlock Avenue. Please select a street tree that will not cause conflicts with the
utility.
c-d Completed.
10. The plan shall provide that "only low volume or subsurface irrigation shall be used to irrigate any
vegetation within twenty-four inches of an impermeable surface unless the adjacent impermeable
· surfaces are designed and constructed to cause water to drain entirely into a landscaped area". 2nd
Review: The applicant has responded: "Primarily drip irrigation will be used on the property and all
hardscape areas shall drain into an adjacent planting area." Portions of the public sidewalks and
driveway aprons will drain to the street. Please add the underlined portion of the comment above
as a note on the plans.
11. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation) for the next
submittal. Please provide a written response to all comments clearly indicating where and how
each comment was addressed.
NEW COMMENT
1A. The PUD ordinance (Chapter 21.45) requires condominium projects provide street trees to be
spaced no further than 30 feet apart on center. Please address.
October 6, 2015
Steve Shackelton
Suite 359
1106 2nd Street
Encinitas, CA 92024
SUBJECT: PUD 15-17-GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES-CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT {CEQA) APPLICABILITY/PROCESS DETERMINATION AND TARGET DECISION DATE
CEQA Determination:
This is to advise you that after reviewing the application for the project referenced above, the City has
determined that the following environmental review process (pursuant to CEQA) will be required for the
project:
The project is exempt from the provisions of CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Categorical Exemption for In-Fill
Development Project,.... Section 15332. No environmental review is required for the project. A Notice of
Exemption will be filed after approval of the project with the San Diego County Clerk's Office which
involves a filing fee. Please submit a check to the project planner in the amount of $50.00 made out to
the San Diego County Clerk. The check should be submitted approximately one we,ek prior to the
Planning Commission date.
Target Decision Date:
In the interest of expeditiously processing your application consistent with the State Permit Streamlining
Act (California Government Code Section 65950), the project should be scheduled for a1 public hearing
no later than December 2, 2015.
Therefore, in the interest of achieving that decision date/hearing date, all remaining project issues must
be addressed by October 22, 2015. If all project issues are not resolved by the date listed above, you
may formally request a one-time 90 day application extension. Otherwise, you will ne,ed to withdraw
the application.
For additional information related to this CEQA applicability/process determination or should you have
any questions regarding an application extension or would like to withdraw your application, please
contact Austin Silva at (760) 602-4631 or by email at austin.silva@carlsbadca.gov.
Principal Planner
VL:AS:fn
c: Kevin Dunn, 3005 South El Camino Real, San Clemente, CA 92672
David Rick, Project Engineer
File Copy
Data Entry
Community & Economic Development
Planning Division 11635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-73141760-602-4600 I 760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov
Date: October 2, 2015
To: Mike Elliott, City of Carlsbad Landscape Architect
From: John Patterson
Gillespie Moody Patterson, Inc. (858)558-8977
Re: Garfield Custom Beach Homes
Job No. 15-044 (PUD 15-17/ COP 15-34/ SOP 15-16/ MS 15-11}
Please find below responses to 1st review comments dated 9-1-15
Planning Comment Responses
1. The fencing caHouts on the concept plan now correctly label the 'yard types' as
requested.
2. The fencing along Hemlock Ave has been reduced to a maximum 42" height as
requested, {1I
3. See response #3 above for compliance.
Planning CQmment RespQnS§
1. Existing planting has been called out to remain or be removed as requested.
2. All property Jines hav1e been called out.
3. AH ptant material that could obstruct the line of site for motorists are no larger than
30" in height. ,
4. See response #1 above for compliance.
5. A revised maintenance map has been updated on the plans.
6. No the fencing should not be placed on top of the retaining waiL
7. Additional screening has been added to comply with the Landscape manual as
requested.
8. The trees along the street frontage have been adjusted.
9. Primarily drip irrigation will be used on the property and all hardscape areas shall drain
into an adjacent planting area.
4010 Sorrento Valley B!vd. ' 858 558 8977 t.~~MDiCA~E ARCHffECTU-fUE: Master Planned Communii:fes ., Urban fiHxed .. Use "' t"lu!ti-FamH~J
o·;;:~nm~r~ir.;d e~ R~tti:H " Srte Suste;!nabiHty _,. PErks " G~·jf Ct:Hlr::i:e$ .. Hodel H:)m.ts ... H;;.f:iipf~ality
3D f"i~d~!lng "' \fV~t·N C~,n~e:rvift~ )rt!fii<&tlen DP--i:!gn
Suite 200 w gmp!andarc.:h.corn
San Dlegc~ CA 92121
m
If you have any questions or comments please feel free to call.
(858)5 58-8977
Max Vedder
40"10 Sorrento Valley Blvd.
Suite200
San Die_go-l' CA 92121
T SSB 558 8977
w gn1piandarch.com
LANDSCAPE AF:CHfT~CTUli'.H.f!: !\"laster Planned CrJmrrtW'ii't~es .. Urban Mixed .. Use ~ Muiti .. famBy
Co-tr'lm.erda1 8~ RetaH "' Sit~ Sus.tainabiiity .,., Pans <~< G'llf Co;.zrse:.t. " fll:ode-1 Ho-m~s !I< Hcspit~iity
3D M-Odt!i:liri,~ "' ViJtli!;"€>1" COr>!"~n..rJr;g h'rlgt~:'I:!On D-Bslg i'l:
September 1, 2015
Steve Shackelton
Suite 359
1106 2''" Street
Encinitas, CA 92024
{_City of
Carlsbad
SUBJECT: 1st REVIEW FOR PUD 15-17/CDP 15·34/SDP 15-16/MS 15·11 -GARFIELD CUSTOM
BEACH HOMES
Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed
your Planned Development, Coastal Development Permit, Site Development Permit, and Minor
Subdivision, application nos. PUD 15-17/CDP 15· 34/SDP 15-16/MS 15-11, as to its completeness for
processing.
The application is complete, as subm1tted. Although the initial processing of your application may have
already begun, the technical acceptance date b acknowledged by the date of this communication. The
City may. in the course o1f processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or
otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. In addiltion, you should also
be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application
can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Division will begin processing your application as of the
date of this communication.
At this time, the City asks that you provide three (3) complete sets of the development plans so that the
proJeCt can continue to be reviewed. The City will complete the reyiew of_your resubmittal within 25
~a~
In order to expedite the processing of your application, please contact me at (760) 602~4631, to discuss
or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application ami to completely understand this letter. You may
also contact each commenting department individually c~s follows:
• Land Development Engineering Division: David Hick, Associate Engineer, at (760) 602-2781
AUSTIN SILVA, AICP
Associate Planner
Planning Division 1 1635 F,'Hilday Avenu;;. C;;,rbbad. CA 9200&~73!4 i 7otH:i02·4660 1 7t>O·f;02-8S60 1 1 www.ciHISt>ildca.gov
PUD 15-17/CDP 15-34/SOP 15-16/MS 15·11-GARFIELO CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
September 1, 2015
ISSUES Of CONCERN
Planning:
1 Please label the Garfield Street frontage as the front yard, the opposite side as the rear yard.
Hemlock Avenue as the street side yard, and the property line adjacent to the neighboring property
to the south as the interior side yard
2. Fencing on the street side yard cannot exceed 42". Please reduce the fence height along Hemlock
Avenue, or move the fence back so it is out of the setback area. if it is out of the setback area. it
may be a maximum of six feet taiL
3 Fencing in the front yarc1 setback cannot exceed 42". Please reduce the tence height in the tront
yard along the intenor side yard to 42". The fence may have a maximum height of six feet once it is
out of the front yard area ...
4. The project is required to comply with Citv Council Policy 44. Please address the following issues:
A A minirrwrn of four complimentary des1gn details. shall be incorporated into each of the
J!:.Q.Dt, r£,?r and street side building facades Qf the homes. They include but are-not' limited
to: balconies, decorative eaves/fascia, towers, knee braces, dormers, columns, exterior
wood element~., and accent materials.
B. There shall be at least four separate bui!dmg planes on street side elevations. The minimum
oft::.et in planes shall be 18 inches and shall include, ·b~tr~ be limited to~ building walls,
porches and roofs. The rntnimum depth between the faces of the forward most plane and
the rear plane on tt1e front elevation shall be 10 feet. A plane must be a mininwm of 30
c
square feet to receive credit under this section ~-"--""""'1 'li -~ ............... At least 66% of exterior opening (door/viindow~) on every horne in the project shall be
recessed or project i! minimum of two inches and shall be constructed with wood, vinyl or
colored aluminum window frames (no mil! finishes).
Engineering:
·-·
1. On ~heet AO.O and sheet 1 of 2 of the civil plans. prov1cle the arnount of proposed impervious area
for the project. including any impervious sidewalk or driveway in the public right-of-way. This
information is needed to determine whether the project is defined as a Priority Development
project (PDP) or not !f more than 5,000 square feet of impervious area is proposed, the project will
be subject to PDP requirements and standard storm water quality requirements per the BMP Design
Manual. PDP's require subrnittal of a Storm Water Ot1ality Management Plan (SWQMP) with
numerically sized BMP's will be required. If less than 5,000 square feet of impervious area is
JJrOposed, just standard storm water quality requirements through the use of Low Impact
Development (LID) will apply
Since standard storm water quality requirements will apply either way, add additional LiD by
directing driveway drainage through the yard before discharging to the street and/or adding
adequate pervious area to rhe driveway, The public )iclewalk to be added per the attached redlined
romrnents on the plan" shall be non-contiguc>u<> with the curb. This design wiH allow for sidewalk
runoff to discharge to the parkway before entering the public drainage system.
PUD 15-17/CDP 15-34/SDP 15-16/MS 15-11-GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
September 1, 2015
Pae.;;> 3 ______ ,
2 C1ty Standard GS-15 requires that drainage from the building foundation be established at a 2~1{,
positive grade a minimum of five feet from the building foundation. A lesser distance requires city
engineer approval. The nty engineer will not approve a lesser distance without a letter from a
registered soils enginE'N supporting a lesser distance. Please provide such a letter or revise the plans
to comply with City standa(d GS-15 .
.3. On section B-8, plot the limits of the projected three foot over excavation 5 feet beyond the building
footprint and show how it eKcavatiOn can occur without impacting the existing retaining wall
abutting the southerly property line. Also. plot the backfill matenal and drains required per detail
SDRSD (-8. The wall shall be located far enough from the property line so that all backfill materiaL
drains and excavation can be constructed on the subject property
4. Plot proposed 5-foot wide public sidewalk three feet from the curb along the proJect frontage on
Hemlock Avenue. Transition sidewalk back to the curb at the easterly and westerly terminus.
Construct 5 foot wide sidewalk behind the driveway instead of a four foot width per SDRSD G-14C.
Show proposed dedication of three foot wide pedestrian access easement to accommodate said
sidewalk behind the driveway.
5. Add the sewer invert elevat1on at the point of connection between the lateral and sewer main tor
House 112
6. Per Map 1747 and the title report w!1ich does not list any additional easement or ROW dedications,
the right-ot-way width does appear to be 50 feet as indicated on the plan. However, the assessors
page 204-270-04 shows that the ROW width of all of Hemlock Avenue is 60 feet. This appears to be
an error. Please research further to verify that the right-ot-way is 50 feet and not 60 feet per the
assessor page.
7. Address comments on red lined plans.
landscape:
-·
Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area ol
the comment concern.
Please address landscaping of all areas including the parkway. Indicate if the turf and palm are to
remain. See comment number 9 if the palrn 1s to lJe removed.
2 Please show and label all property lines, and right ·of·ways on the plans.
3. The plan shall demonstrate tllai plants, when installed and at maturity, will be positioned to avoid
obstructing motorists' views of pedestrian crossmgs, driveways,. roadways and Qther vehicular travel
ways. Please verify with the c1ty F. ngineering Divtston if this is a collector street or largpr. If a
collector street or larger, landscape elements over 30 inches in height (including planting measured
at maturity) as measured from adjacent street grade are not permitted at street corners within a
triangular zone drawn from two points, 25 feet outward from the beginning of curves. Please
address
PUD 1517/CDP 15·34/SDP 15-16/MS 15·11-GARFtELD CUSTO!Vl BEt\CH HOMES
September 1, 201.5
4. Generally identify all ex1stmg woody plant material to be removed or retained. Trees over 12" in
caliper diameter shall be identified on the plan individuattv as to caliper size and type and labeled to
be retained or removed. It appears that there may be trees that are larger than 12" in caliper.
Please clanfy which specific trees <'!rt-to rpmain.
~. Please address maintenance of the parkway and add the area to the total landscape area square
footage.
6. Should the fence be located on top of the retaining wall' Please review.
7 The landscape Manual indicates that landscape plans are to feature ground cover, shn;bs. and trees
to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. The Landscape Manual
also indicates that landscaping shall be used to accentuate and enhance architecture. Please
provide vertical evergreen trees along the north. south, east and west sides of the buildings to both
soften and enhance the elevations.
t1 Prov;de a minimum of one street tree for every 40' of street frontage Trees may be planted on
center or grouped. Trees shall be .~elected from the approved tree replacement list identified In
Chapter 6 of the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, unless approved otherwise. Street
trees shall be located:
A. A minimum of seven (7) feet from any sewer line.
B. In areas that do not conflict with public utiHi.ies
C. Outside of sight distancE' areas.
D. A minimum of three 13) feet outside the public right of way. unless approved otherwise by
the Citv.
9. The plan shall provide that only low volume or subsurface irrigation shall be used to irrigate any
vegetation within twenty-four inches of an impermeable sudace unless the adjacent impermeable
.;;urfac.es are designed and COilstructed to cause water to drain entirely into a landscaped area.
10. RETURN REOLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation) for the next
submittal. Please provide a written response to all comments dearly indicating where and how
each comment was addressed.
Engineering:
GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
PUD 15-17/CDP 15-34/SDP 15-16/MS 15-11
Response to Comments
September 17,2015
1. On sheet AO.O and sheet 1 of 2 of the civil plans, provide the amount of proposed
impervious area for the project, including any impervious sidewalk or driveway in the
public right-of-way. This information is needed to determine whether the project is
defined as a Priority Development project (PDP) or not. If more than 5,000 square feet of
impervious area is proposed, the project will be subject to PDP requirements and standard
storm water quality requirements per the BMP Design ManuaL PDP's require submittal
of a Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) with numerically sized BMP's
will be required. If less than 5,000 square feet of impervious area is proposed, just
standard storm wat1er quality requirements through the use of Low Impact Development
(LID) will apply.
Since standard stotm water quality requirements will apply either way, add additional
LID by directing driveway drainage through the yard before discharging to the street
and/or adding adequate pervious area to the driveway. The public sidewalk to be added
per the attached redlined comments on the plans shall be non-contiguous with the curb.
This design will allow for sidewalk runoff to discharge to the parkway before entering the
public drainage system.
2. City Standard GS-15 requires that drainage from the building foundation be established at
a 2% positive grade a minimum of five feet from the building foundation. A lesser
distance requires eity engineer approval. The city engineer will not approve a lesser
distance without a letter from a registered soils engineer supporting a lesser distance.
Please provide such a letter or revise the plans to comply with City standard GS-15.
PUO 15-17/ COP 15-34 /SOP 15-16 I MS 15-11, (3806 Garfield Street)
Page2
3. On section B-B, plot the limits of the projected three foot over excavation 5 feet beyond
the building footprint and show how it excavation can occur without impacting the
existing retaining wall abutting the southerly property line. Also, plot the backfill
material and drains required per detail SDRSD C-8. The wall shall be located far enough
from the property line so that all backfill material, drains and excavation can be
constructed on the subject property.
4. Plot proposed 5~foot wide public sidewalk three feet from the curb along the project
frontage on Hemlock Avenue. Transition sidewalk back to the curb at the easterly and
westerly terminus. Construct 5 foot wide sidewalk behind the driveway instead of a four
foot width per SDRSD G·14C. Show proposed dedication of three foot wide pedestrian
access easement to acco111111odate said sidewalk behind the driveway.
5. Add the sewer invert elevation at the point of connection between the lateral and sewer
main for House #2.
6. Per Map 1747 and the title report which does not list any additional easement or ROW
dedications, the right-of-way width does appear to be 50 feet as indicated on the plan.
PUO 15~17 I COP 15~34 I SOP 15-16 I MS 15~11, (3806 Garfield Street)
Page 3
However, the assessors page 204-270-04 shows that the ROW width of all of Hemlock
Avenue is 60 feet. This appears to be an error. Please research further to verify that the
right~of-way is 50 f(~et and not 60 feet per the assessor page.
7. Address comments on redlined plans.
September 1, 2015
Steve Shackelton
Suite 359
1106 2nd Street
Encinitas, CA 92024
GJ):!J/Ib
{"city of
Carls Dad
SUBJECT: 1st REVIEW FOR PUD 15-17/CDP 15-34/SDP 15-16/MS 15-11 -GARIFIELD CUSTOM
BEACH HOMES
Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Division has reviewed
your Planned Development, Coastal Development Permit, Site Development Permit, and Minor
Subdivision, application nos. PUD 15-17 /CDP 15-34/SDP 15-16/MS 15-11, as to its completeness for
processing.
The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have
already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The
City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or
otherwise supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, you should also
be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application
can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Division will begin processing your application as of the
date of this communication.
At this time, the City asks that you provide three (3} complete sets of the development plans so that the
project can continue to be reviewed. The City will complete the review of your resubmittal within 25
days.
In order to expedite the processing of your application, please contact me at (760) 602-4631, to discuss
or to schedule a meeting to discuss your application and to completely understand this letter. You may
also contact each commenting department individually as follows:
• Land Development Engineering Division: David Rick, Associate Engineer, at (760} 602-2781
AUSTIN SILVA, AICP
Associate Planner
AS:fn
c: Kevin Dunn, 3005 South El Camino Real, San Clemente, CA 92672
David Rick, Project Engineer
File Copy
Communif~t8f~2'onomic Development
Planning Division 11635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-73141760-602-4660 1760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov
PUD 15-17 /CDP'1S::~4/~~~15>'l6"/MS 15-11-GARFIELD CUSTOM BEALrl HOMES
September 1, 2'b1S7~ l2 ~!,) !;)
Pa e 2
ISSUES OF CONCERN
Planning:
1. Please label the Garfield Street frontage as the front yard, the opposite side as the rear yard,
Hemlock Avenue as the street side yard, and the property line adjacent to the neighboring property
to the south as the interior side yard. '"
2. Fencing on the street side yard cannot exceed 42". Please reduce the fence height along Hemlock
Avenue, or move the fence back so it is out of the setback area. If it is out of the setback area, it
may be a maximum of six feet tall.
3. Fencing in the front yard setback cannot exceed 42". Please reduce the fence height in the front
yard along the interior side yard to 42". The fence may have a maximum height of six feet once it is
out of the front yard area.
4. The project is required to comply with City Council Policy 44. Please address the following issues:
A. A minimum of four complimentary design details, shall be incorporated into each of the
front, rear and street side building facades of the homes. They include but are not limited
to: balconies, decorative eaves/fascia, towers, knee braces, dormers, columns, exterior
wood elements, and accent materials.
B. There shall be at least four separate building planes on street side elevations. The minimum
offset in planes shall be 18 inches and shall include, but not be limited to, building walls,
porches and roofs. The minimum depth between the faces of the forward most plane and
the rear plane on the front elevation shall be 10 feet. A plane must be a minimum of 30
square feet to receive credit under this section.
C. At least 66% of exterior opening (door/windows) on every home in the project shall be
recessed or project a minimum of two inches and shall be constructed with wood, vinyl or
colored aluminum window frames (no mill finishes).
Engineering:
1. On sheet AO.O and sheet 1 of 2 of the civil plans, provide the amount of proposed impervious area
for ·the project, including any impervious sidewalk or driveway in the public right-of-way. This
information is needed to determine whether the project is defined as a Priority Development
project (PDP) or not. If more than 5,000 square feet of impervious area is proposed, the project will
be subject to PDP requirements and standard storm water quality requirements per the BMP Design
Manual. PDP's require submittal of a Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) with
numerically sized BMP's will be required. If less than 5,000 square feet of impervious area is
proposed, just standard storm water quality requirements through the use of Low Impact
Development (LID) will apply.
Since standard storm water quality requirements will apply either way, add additional LID by
directing driveway drainage through the yard before discharging to the street and/or adding
adequate pervious area to the driveway. The public sidewalk to be added per the attached redlined
comments on the plans shall be non-contiguous with the curb. This design will allow for sidewalk
runoff to discharge to the parkway before entering the public drainage system.
PUD 15-17 /COP 15-34/SDP 15-16;1VJS 15-11-GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES
September 1, 2015
Page 3
2. City Standard GS-15 requires that drainage from the building foundation be established at a 2%
positive grade a minimum of five feet from the building foundation. A lesser distance requires city
engineer approval. The city engineer will not approve a lesser distance without a letter from a
registered soils engineer supporting a lesser distance. Please provide such a letter or revise the plans
to comply with City standard GS-15.
3. On section B-B, plot the limits of the projected three foot over excavation 5 feet beyond the building
footprint and show how it excavation can occur without impacting the existing retaining wall
abutting the southerly property line. Also, plot the backfill material and drains required per detail
SDRSD C-8. The wall shall be located far enough from the property line so that all backfill material,
drains and excavation can be constructed on the subject property.
4. Plot proposed 5-foot wide public sidewalk three feet from the curb along the project frontage on
Hemlock Avenue. Transition sidewalk back to the curb at the easterly and westerly terminus.
Construct 5 foot wide sidewalk behind the driveway instead of a four foot width per SDRSD G-14C.
Show proposed dedication of three foot wide pedestrian access easement to accommodate said
sidewalk behind the driveway.
5. Add the sewer invert elevation at the point of connection between the lateral and sewer main for
House #2.
6. Per Map 1747 and the title report which does not list any additional easement or ROW dedications,
the right-of-way width does appear to be 50 feet as indicated on the plan. However, the assessors
page 204-270-04 shows that the ROW width of all of Hemlock Avenue is 60 feet. This appears to be
an error. Please research further to verify that the right-of-way is 50 feet and not 60 feet per the
assessor page.
7. Address comments on redlined plans.
landscape:
Numbers below are referenced on the red line plans where appropriate for ease in locating the area of
the comment concern.
1. Please addr~ss landscaping of all areas including the parkway. Indicate if the turf and palm are to
remain. See comment number 9 if the palm is to be removed.
2. Please show and label all property lines, and right-of-ways on the plans.
3. The plan shall demonstrate that plants, when installed and at maturity, will be positioned to avoid
obstructing motorists' views of pedestrian crossings, driveways, roadways and other vehicular travel
ways. Please verify with the city Engineering Division if this is a collector street or larger. If a
collector street or larger, landscape elements over 30 inches in height (including planting measured
at maturity) as measured from adjacent street grade are not permitted at street corners within a
triangular zone drawn from two points, 25 feet outward from the beginning of curves. Please
address.
PUD 15-17 /CDP 15-34/SDP 15-16/MS 15-11-GARFIELD CUSTOM BEALrt HOMES
September 1, 2015
Pa e 4
4. Generally identify all existing woody plant material to be removed or retained. Trees over 12" in
caliper diameter shall be identified on the plan individually as to caliper size and type and labeled to
be retained or removed. It appears that there may be trees that are larger than 12" in caliper.
Please clarify which specific trees are to remain.
5. Please address maintenance of the parkway and add the area to the total landscape area square
footage. rc
6. Should the fence be located on top of the retaining wall? Please review.
7. The Landscape Manual indicates that landscape plans are to feature ground cover, shrubs, and trees
to screen elements of unsightliness and screen/soften new improvements. The Landscape Manual
also indicates that landscaping shall be used to accentuate and enhance architecture. Please
provide vertical evergreen trees along the north, south, east and west sides of the buildings to both
soften and enhance the elevations.
8. Provide a minimum of one street tree for every 40' of street frontage. Trees may be planted on
center or grouped. Trees shall be selected from the approved tree replacement list identified in
Chapter 6 of the Carlsbad Community Forest Management Plan, unless approved otherwise. Street
trees shall be located:
A. A minimum of seven (7) feet from any sewer line.
B. In areas that do not conflict with public utilities.
C. Outside of sight distance areas.
D. A minimum of three (3) feet outside the public right of way, unless approved otherwise by
the City.
9. The plan shall provide that only low volume or subsurface irrigation shall be used to irrigate any
vegetation within twenty-four inches of an impermeable surface unless the adjacent impermeable
surfaces are designed and constructed to cause water to drain entirely into a landscaped area.
10. RETURN REDLINES and provide 2 copies of all plans (concept, water conservation) for the next
submittal. Please provide a written response to all comments clearly indicating where and how
each comment was addressed.