Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPUD 92-01F; LeClair House Addition; Planned Unit Development - Non-Residential (PUD) (2)Chris Sexton - PUD 92-01 Fie Clair Hoi \ddition From: Chris Scobba To: JLeClair@clinimetrics.com Date: 06/14/2006 2:05:50 PM Subject: PUD 92-01F Le Clair House Addition Mr. Le Clair, As requested by you wife over the phone today I am sending the aerial photo with topography that was intended to illustrate the discrepancy with similar information shown on the site plan as submitted for engineering review, but appears to have been omitted from the correspondence that was sent to you/your architect. I have discussed the related issue with Bonnie and given her clarification on the topography and retaining wall/grading issues. We also discussed the issue regarding storm water quality notes; if a legible copy is not available to be included on the plans, the intent is not served. I would not require the notes, but they are applicable as ground disturbing activities are proposed with the subject development. I will condition the PUD to be in full compliance with Federal and State EPA-National Pollution and Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements during construction, as is sufficient to secure the interests of the City. Further information regarding NPDES requirements can be obtained from the following: http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/ & http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/index.html Please call me with any questions or clarifications. Regards,Chris Scobba, PE Associate Engineer City of Carlsbad Development Services Engineering Department 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2747 CC:BonLacher@juno.com; Chris Sexton Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArclMS HTML Viewer Map • v Legend Surveyed Ctly Boundary | | Municipal Boundaries Streets X P*MA*'** Major AiteM Muarial Road Jt/ Ct*ec3ar Road /./ m«f • . " Ofsl Road -"'" Oftar Q Drainage Structure Conduit Sewer P^e Contour Lines -2001 http://gisweb/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=3.... 06/06/2006 isej^ddition ~^fc~. ..." "... ._".! .._ I"!""... Page 1 I From: "John LeClair" <John.LeClair@clinimetrics.com> To: "Chris Scobba" <Cscob@ci.carlsbad.ca.us> Date: 06/14/2006 5:24:31 PM Subject: RE: PUD 92-01F Le Clair House Addition Thank you Chris. Hopefully, we can get all of the required documents to you in a timely manner. John O. LeClair From: Chris Scobba [mailto:Cscob@ci.carlsbad.ca.us] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 2:06 PM To: John LeClair Cc: Chris Sexton; BonLacher@juno.com Subject: PUD 92-01F Le Clair House Addition Mr. Le Clair, As requested by you wife over the phone today I am sending the aerial photo with topography that was intended to illustrate the discrepancy with similar information shown on the site plan as submitted for engineering review, but appears to have been omitted from the correspondence that was sent to you/your architect. I have discussed the related issue with Bonnie and given her clarification on the topography and retaining wall/grading issues. We also discussed the issue regarding storm water quality notes; if a legible copy is not available to be included on the plans, the intent is not served. I would not require the notes, but they are applicable as ground disturbing activities are proposed with the subject development. I will condition the PUD to be in full compliance with Federal and State EPA-National Pollution and Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements during construction, as is sufficient to secure the interests of the City. Further information regarding NPDES requirements can be obtained from the following: http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/ & http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/index.html Please call me with any questions or clarifications. ChnsSexton VRE:~PU1D 92-01F Le ClaBuse Addition Regards, Chris Scobba, PE Associate Engineer City of Carlsbad Development Services Engineering Department 1635 Faraday Ave Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2747 CC: "Chris Sexton" <Csexton@ci.carlsbad.ca.us>, <Bonl_acher@juno.com> City of Carlsbad Planning Department June 6, 2006 John LeClair 6709 Whitesail Street Carlsbad CA 92011 SUBJECT: PUD 92-01(F) - LECLAIR HOUSE ADDITION Thank you for applying for Land Use Permits in the City of Carlsbad. The Planning Department has reviewed your Planned Unit Development Amendment, application no. PUD 92-01 (F), as to its completeness for processing. The application is complete, as submitted. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise, supplement the basic information required for the application. In addition, you should also be aware that various design issues may exist. These issues must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a hearing. The Planning Department will begin processing your application as of the date of this communication. At this time, the City asks that you provide 2 complete sets of the development plans so that the project can continue to be reviewed. Please contact your staff planner, Chris Sexton, at (760) 602-4624, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, DON NEU Assistant Planning Director DN:CS:bd c: Chris Scobba, Project Engineer File Copy Data Entry 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us PUD 92-01 (F) - LECLAIR HOUSE ADDITION June 6, 2006 Page 2 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO^OMPLETE THE APPLICATION Planning: None Engineering: None ISSUES OF CONCERN Planning: 1. Please add the General Plan designation "RM/OS" to the site plan. Engineering: 1. Please provide a current (within the preceding 6 months) preliminary title report for proper evaluation of the current disposition of the subject property: Note: Please provide for verification of trail easement quitclaim. 2. Please provide a grading plan showing building pad elevations and all grading proposed for the construction or installation of buildings and/or improvements to serve the project. The grading plan together with the original topographical contours may both be shown on the site plan. This plan shall indicate approximate earthwork volumes of proposed excavation and filling operations and remedial earthwork. In the event no such grading is proposed, a statement to that effect shall be placed on the site plan. Note: Final determination is pending supplimental information for proposed retaining wall. 3. Please delineate consistent with the title sheet legend, all proposed walls. Top of wall "TW", finish ground at face of wall "FG", and top of footing "TF" elevations labeled at all points of discontinuity and all extremes in height are required. Add a typical section taken at the most conservative point that illustrates the points where the TW/FG/TF elevations provided in plan view are associated with that includes back of wall surcharge drainage features. All walls adjacent to property lines, the public ROW or easements must include delineation of the wall and footing relationship to the associated boundary with all necessary dimensions. Note: Please provide for proposed retaining wall at rear deck. 4. Please delineate consistent with the title sheet legend in line type and line type scale/line weights all existing and proposed finish grade contours with proposed major contour interval presented with an increased emphasis (bold) line type and elevations labeled at all points necessary to clearly illustrate the proposed drainage and the relationship of PUD 92-01 (F) - LECLAIR HOUSE ADDITION June 6, 2006 Page3 existing and proposed topography. Existing contours are to be screened and dashed with an increased emphasis on existing major contour intervals. Include all tops and toes of slopes and all transitions from existing to proposed and cut to fill via unique and distinct daylight and cut-fill line types. Include all symbols in the title sheet legend consistent in line type and line type scale/line weight. Note: See attached aerial GIS plot with contours. Please rectify apparent discrepancy with plan. 5. Please provide total estimated preliminary earthwork quantities to accomplish the proposed grading or construction of the subject project. Note: Provide quantities associated with footing spoils and retaining wall backfill. 6. Existing and proposed flow directions have been provided to a level of detail necessary to evaluate the preliminary drainage for the subject project. Note: Provide supplemental information for changes to plan around the proposed retaining wall. 7. Please show existing topographic contours and sufficient spot elevations to clearly define the relationship between existing site features and proposed grading/improvements, and to clearly define existing drainage directions both within and adjacent to the subject development. Note: Provide supplemental information for changes to plan (See attached aerial photo with topo). Please see red line check print for minor comments. Please return with subsequent submittal.