The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPUD 92-05; Casas Del Marisol; Planned Unit Development - Non-Residential (PUD) (2)oNotice of Determination To: _X Office of Planning and Research From: 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161_X County Clerk County of San Diego Attn: Mita PO Box 1750 San Diego, CA 92112-4147 Project No.: PUD 92-05 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Casas del Marisol ' Project Title 93061015 City of Carlsbad. Mike Grim 438-1161. 4499 State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Lead Agency Contact Person Area Code/Telephone/Extension South of Adams Street, between Highland Drive and Park Drive. City of Carlsbad. County of San Diego Project Location (include county) Project Description: Four lot residential subdivision with grading and construction for three single family homes and a private street lot. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on July 8, 1993 and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project. 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project 5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final Negative Declaration with comments and responses and record of project approval are available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. 3/11/51. Date PLANNING DIRECTOR MICHAEL J. HOLZ:TITLE Date received for filing at OAR: MG:lh Revised October 1989 o STATE OF CAUFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME BtiVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT DFG 753.5a (6-91) 21128 Lead Agency: County/State Agency of Project Title: Project Applicant Name: Project Applicant Addressr Project Applicant (check appropriate box): Local Public Agency | | School District | | Other Special District State Agency f~! Private Entity fl CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: $850.00 $1,250.00 $850.00 $850.00 $25.00 *. $. 5. $. $ r^i ( ) Environmental Impact Report ( ) Negative Declaration ( ) Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) ( ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs ( ) County Administrative Fee ftf Project that is exempt from fees ' TOTAL RECEIVED Signaturearid title of person receiving payment: £\^<W l*J~*'^*~~y V^IRST COPY-PROJECT APPLICANT SECOND COPY-DFG/FASB THIRD COPY-LEAD AGENCY FOURTH COPY-COUNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FIUNG $0 Notice of Determination 93041 To: _X Office of Planning and Research From: 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Divv : ^ 0 k n rjGarlsbad, CA ^2009 IT Annette J. Evans, Clerk \±i) _X County Clerk jy|_ 2 8 1993 (6>9) 438-1161 County of San Diego Attn: Mita PO Box 1750 San Diego, CA 92112-4147 j Project No.: PUD 92-05 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Casas del Marisol • Project Title 93061015 City of Carlsbad. Mike Grim (6191 438-1161. 4499 State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Lead Agency Contact Person Area Code/Telephone/Extension South of Adams Street, between Highland Drive and Park Drive. City of Carlsbad. County of San Diego Project Location (include county) Project Description:Four lot residential subdivision with grading and construction for three single family homes and a private street lot. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on July 8, 1993 and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project. 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project 5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final Negative Declaration with comments and responses and record of project approval are available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. PLANNING DIRECTOR TITLEMICHAEL J. HOLZ:Date Date received for filing at OAR: MG:lh STATE OF CAUFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT DFG 753.5a (6-91) 21128 Lead Agency: County/State Agency of Project Title: Project Applicant Name: Project Applicant Address: Project Applicant (check appropriate box): Local Public Agency |~~| School District I I Other Special District State Agency [~l Private Entity f~l CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: ( ) Environmental Impact Report ( ) Negative Declaration ( ) Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) ( ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs ( ) County Administrative Fee (yf Project that is exempt from fees ' TOTAL RECEIVED Signatureaftii title of person receiving payment: f\.^f VFWST COPY-PROJECT APPLICANT $850.00 $1,250.00 $850.00 $850.00 $25.00 $ $ $ $ $ SECOND COPY-DFG/FASB THIRD -LEAD AGENCY FOURTH COPY-COUNTY/STATE AGENCY OF RUNG r ^^^^^H rNotice of Determination 930394 To: _X Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, From: City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009 County Clerk D1 " Ut77 (619)438-1161 County of San Diego Attn: Mita PO Box 1750 San Diego, CA 92112-4147 Project Nc.: PUD 92-05 Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Casas del Marisol Project Tide 93061015 City of Carlsbad. Mike Grim (619) 438-1161. 4499 State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Lead Agency Contact Person Area Code/Telephone/Extension South of Adams Street, between Highland Drive and Park Drive. City of Carlsbad. County of San Diego Project Location (include county) Project Description:Four lot residential subdivision with grading and construction for three single family homes and a private street lot. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad has approved the above described project on August 18, 1992 and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project. 1. The project wfll not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was not adopted for this project 5. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the final Negative Declaration with comments and responses and record of project approval are available to the General Public at THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. 1/1 s/? ^PLANNING DIRECTOR MICHAEL J. HOLZ bate'TITLE Date received for filing at OAR: MG:lh OfFICB OF THE COUNTY CL3RE, L 161993 I99 1 fi 1993 a»f tmiTBD TO-AOBHCY OH DBPtTTY -Revised October 19! City of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: South of Adams Street, between Highland Drive and Park Drive, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Four lot residential subdivision with grading and construction for three single family homes and a private street lot. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (619) 438-1161, extension 4499. DATED: JUNE 10, 1993 CASE NO: PUD 92-05/MS 92-06 CASE NAME: CASAS DEL MARISOL PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 10, 1993 MG:vd V JF.. T*"/1-''^r mx"^*TL^*g * | \^rif, .rw < MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning Director 22. "X~ '• ' 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 - (619) 438-1161 CALTO!iRNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH PO BOX 944209 SACRAMENTO CA 94244-2090 rGAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Tide/Location (include county): CASAS DEL MARISOL 4519 Adams Street City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of CA Name and Address of Applicant: Laguna Associates, Inc. 2620 Acuna Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project Description: Four lot residential subdivision with grading and construction for three single family homes and a private street lot. Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): The City of Carlsbad Planning Department has completed an Environmental Initial Study for the above referenced property, including evaluation of the proposed project's potential for adverse environmental impacts on fish and wildlife resources. Based on the completed Environmental Initial Study, the City of Carlsbad Planning Department finds there is no evidence before the City of Carlsbad that the proposal will have potential for an adverse effect on wild life resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. The City of Carlsbad has on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in AB 3158 Chapter 1706 Section 753.5(d). 1. 2. 3. Certification: I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above findings of fact and that based on the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. 0 MICHAEL J.TOLZMILLER MG:vd Title: Planning Director Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad £)ate: June 2, 1993 Section 711.4, Fish and Game Code DFG:12/90 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISHED GAME ENVIRONMENTAL^. DFG 753.5a (6-91) lNG FEE CASH RECEIPT Lead Agency: County/State Agency of Project Title: Project Applicant Name: (&-> & * * • {yCf £ -J-fo Project Applicant Address:- Project Applicant (check appropriate box): Local Public Agency | | School District | | Other Special District State Agency I I Private Entity I I CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: ( ) Environmental Impact Report ( ) Negative Declaration ( ) Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) ( ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs ( ) County Administrative Fee (Nf Project that is exempt from fees ' TOTAL RECEIVED Signaturearici title of person receiving payment: f^9^f\T7(i^f~^Y \xflRST COPY-PROJECT APPLICANT SECOND COPY-DFG /PASS THIRD CBPY-LEAD AGENCY FOURTH COPY-COUNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FILING $850.00 $1,250.00 $850.00 $850.00 $25.00 $ $ $ $ $ $e> STATE OF CAUFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AmGAME ENVIRONMENTAL (BNG FEE CASH RECEIPT DFG 753.5a (6-91) 21147 Lead Agency: County/State Agency of Project Title: Project Applicant Name:Phone Number: ,/ Project Applicant Address: _j. Project Applicant (check appropriate box): Local Public Agency | | School District State Agency I I Private Entity I I Other Special District | | CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: Environmental Impact Report Negative Declaration Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs County Administrative Fee $850.00 $1 ,250.00 $850.00 $850.00 $25.00 "'('XT Project that is exempt from fees Signature/ejid title of person receiving payment: 'FIRST COPY-PROJECT APPLICANT SECOND COPY-DFG/FASB TOTAL RECEIVED THIRD COPY4CAD AGENCY FOURTH COPY-COUNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FILING STATE OF CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON, Governor GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 Jul 08, 1993 MIKE GRIM CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Subject: CASAS DEL MARISOL SCH # 93061015 Dear MIKE GRIM: The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document to selected state agencies for review. The review period is closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please call Tom Loftus at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. When contacting the Clearinghouse in this matter, please use the eight-digit State Clearinghouse number so that we may respond promptly. Sincerely, Christine Kinne Acting Deputy Director, Permit Assistance Moil to: State Clearinghouse, KM Tenth Street, Rm. 121, Sacraoento, CA 958U - 916/U5-061J Project Title: Casas Pet Marisol Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad street Address: 2075 las Palmaa Drive City: Carlsbad Se* HOTE Belou: sex f Contact Person: Hifce GrimQ 8 0 6 1 0 1 5 Phone: t619) W8-1161 Zip: 92009 County: San Dieao PROJECT LOCATION: County: San Diego City/dearest Community: Carlsbad Cross Streets: Adams Street and Highland Drive Assessor's Parcel No. 206-200-07 Section: Total Acres: Tup. 1.1 Ranee: Uithin 2 Miles: State Huy *: 1-5 Hotel-nays: Aaua Hedionda I Airports: Palomar Rail ways: ATSSf . Schools: DOCUMENT TYPE HOP Early Cons ; Keg Dec Draft EIB Supplement/Subsequent EIR (Prior SCH Ko.) _ Other •EPA:HOI EA ' Draft EIS FOHSI OWES:. Joint DocumentFinal Document " Other LOCAL ACT[OH TYPE General Plan Update General Plan Amendment General Plan Element Community Plan Specific Plan Master Plan " Planned Unit Development Site Plan . Razor*Preione Use Permit ~ Land Division (Subdivision, " Parcel Nap, Tract Map, etc.) . Annexation '_ Redevelopment . Coastal Permit" Other OEVELOdtaCT TYPE Residential: Office: Commercial: Industrial: Educational Recreational Units I So. Ft. So. Ft. So. Ft. i Acres 1.1 Acres AcresAcres Employees Ecploveeft Employees . Water Facilities: Type . transportation: Type Mining: Mineral ! Cowr: Type . Waate Treatment: Type . Hazardous Waste: Type Other: NGO PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED III DOCUCNT _X Aesthetic/Visual , Agricultural Land Air Quality _X Archaeological/Historical _X Coastal Zone _X Drainage/Absorption Economic/Jobs Fiscal X_ Flood Plain/Flooding Forest Land/Fire Hazard J[_ Geologic/Seismic MineralsNoise J( Population/Housing Balance .X_ Public Services/Facilities . J(_ Recreation/Parks Schools/Universities Jt Water Quality \ Septic Systems X Water Supply/. Seuer Capacity Ground Water Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading Wetland/Riparian isotidW«st« X Wildlife Toxic/Hazardous Jj Growth Inducing . Traffic/Circulation Landuse X vegetation emulative Effect ' Other Present Land Uce/2onfng/General plan U*» Vacant/R-1-10m>t Project Description WA .-<c c0" t^,; - Four lot residential subdivision Kith grading and construction of three single family homes and on* private street. KOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects. If • SCH number already exists for a project (e.g. from a notice of Preparation or previous draft document) pleas* fill it In. • Revised October 1989 CLEARINGHOUSE CONTACT: TOM LOFTUS (916) 445-0613 STATE REVIEW BEGAN: DEPT REV TO AGENCY . a-. AGENCY REV TO SCH : (_- 5CH COMPLIANCE : f- LEASE NOTE SCH NUMBER ON ALL COMMENTS LEASE FORWARD LATE COMMENTS DIRECTLY TO THE LEAD AGENCY ONLY on strt 'Consumer Svca ^Coastal Comm Coastal Consv 3MD/APCD:(Resources: C?/ _ ~T _ Conservation^ Fish & Game ^T <g»CA Waste Mgmt Bd S" - sent by lead / "*" - sent by SCH1• City of Carlsbad Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: South of Adams Street, between Highland Drive and Park Drive, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Four lot residential subdivision with grading and construction for three single family homes and a private street lot. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Mike Grim in the Planning Department at (619) 438-1161, extension 4499. DATED: JUNE 10, 1993 CASE NO: PUD 92-05/MS 92-06 CASE NAME: CASAS DEL MARISOL PUBLISH DATE: JUNE 10, 1993 MG:vd MICHAEL J. H Planning Director 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 - (619) 438-1161 NOTICE OF COMPLETION Mail to: State Clearinghouse, 1400 Te Street, Rm. 121, Sacramento, CA 95814 - 91| Project Title: Casas Del Marisol Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad Contact Person: Hike Grim Street Address: 2075 Las Pa I mas Drive Phone: (619) 438-1161 City: Carlsbad Zip: 92009 County: San Diego See NOTE Below: SCH * PROJECT LOCATION: County: San Diego City/Nearest Community: Carlsbad Cross Streets: Adams Street and Highland Drive Assessor's Parcel No. Within 2 Miles: State DOCUMENT TYPE CEQA: NOP Early Cons X Neg Dec Draft EIR LOCAL ACTION TYPE General Plan Update 206-200-07 Section: Huy #: 1-5 Waterways: Total Acres: 1.1 Two. Range Agua Hedionda Lagoon Airports: Palomar Railways: ATS&F Supplement/Subsequent NEPA: NO I OTHER: EIR (Prior SCH No.) Other Specific Plan General Plan Amendment Master Plan General Plan Element Community Plan DEVELOPMENT TYPE Residential: Units Office: Sq. Ft Commercial: Sq. Ft Industrial: Sq. Ft Educational Recreational PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED X Aesthetic/Visual Agricultural Land Air Quality X Planned Unit Development Site Plan ) 3 Acres 1.1 Acres Employees Acres Employees Acres Employees IN DOCUMENT X Flood Plain/Flooding Forest Land/Fire Hazard X Geologic/Seismic X Archaeological/Historical Minerals X X Coastal Zone X Drainage/Absorption Economic/ Jobs Fiscal Noise X Population/Housing Balance X Public Services/Facilities X X Recreation/Parks X EA Draft EIS FONSI Rezone Prezone Use Permit < Land Division (Subdivision, Parcel Map, Tract Map, etc.) X Water Facilities: Transportation: Mining: Power: Waste Treatment: Hazardous Waste: Other: Schools/Universities Septic Systems Sewer Capacity Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading Solid Waste Toxic/Hazardous Traffic/Circulation Vegetation : Base: Schools: Joint Document Final Document Other Annexation Redevelopment Coastal Permit X Other EIA Type MGD Type Mineral Type Watts Type Type X Water Quality X Water Supply/ Ground Water Wetland/Riparian X Wildlife X Growth Inducing ' Landuse X Cumulative Effect Other Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Use Vacant/R-1-10/RLM Project Description Four lot residential subdivision with grading and construction of three single family homes and one private street. NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects. If a SCH number already exists for a project (e.g. from a Notice of Preparation or previous draft document) please fill it in. Revised October 1989 MG:vd ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART H (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. PUD 92-05/MS 92-06 DATE: May 24. 1993 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Casas Del Marisol 2. APPLICANT: Laguna Associates. Inc. 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2620 Acuna Court Carlsbad. CA 92008 (619) 792-0833 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: April 13. 1992 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Four lot residential subdivision with grading and construction of construction of three single family homes and one private street ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist 8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. * A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked to indicate this determination. * An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" and "YES-insig" respectively. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:YES (sig) YES NO (insig) 1. Result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards? 2. Appreciably change the topography or any unique physical features? 3. Result in or be affected by erosion of soils either on or off the site? 4. Result in changes in the deposition of beach sands, or modification of the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 5. Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality? 6. Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature? 7. Substantially change the course or flow of water (marine, fresh or flood waters)? 8. Affect the quantity or quality of surface water, ground water or public water supply? 9. Substantially increase usage or cause depletion of any natural resources? 10. Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy? 11. Alter a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure or object? X X X -2- BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:YES (sig) YES NO (insig) 12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic plants)? 13. Introduce new species of plants into an area, or a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?X 14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local importance? 15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals, all water dwelling organisms and insects? 16. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? HUMAN ENVIRONMENT X X X WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area? 18. Substantially affect public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency or other public services? YES (sig) YES NO (insig) X X -3- HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste control systems? 20. Increase existing noise levels? 21. Produce new light or glare? 22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? 23. Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area? 24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 25. Generate substantial additional traffic? 26. Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking? 27. Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? 28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? 29. Increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 30. Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans? 31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an aesthetically offensive public view? 32. Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES (sig) YES NO (insig) X X X X X -4- MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 33. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 34. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) 35. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con- siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) 36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? YES (sig) YES (insig) NO -5- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The proposed development involves a four lot, three unit single family subdivision on a 1.1 acre lot, located on the northern shore of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The parcel is currently undeveloped and the lower portion is occasionally used for boat trailer parking. The site slopes from Adams Street towards the lagoon and the floodplain lies approximately 320 feet from the street. The lot directly to the east is vacant and the lot to the west contains a private boat club and an intermittently operating restaurant. The proposed development involves 4,125 cubic yards of grading, with 3,675 cubic yards of import and 450 cubic yards of cut. The proposed grading form two pad areas, generally following the existing terrain, and a 30 foot wide private street. Two of the single family homes will be two story and all will be Spanish Colonial style with varied roof lines and patios. To preserve lagoon view, the elevation of the homes will be below the centerline elevation of Adams Street, as required by the Local Coastal Program. The proposal includes an open space easement which creates an over 100 foot wide buffer between any development and the floodplain. A public access easement traverses the site within this buffer to allow pedestrian access along the lagoon's northern shore. Based upon field investigations, and after review of the proposed development, it has been determined that no significant environmental features exist on the site and the proposed development will no cause any significant adverse environmental impacts. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 1. No existing geologic hazards exist on site and the proposed grading will meet compaction and stability standards. The in-fill project will not result in unstable earth conditions or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards. 2. The proposed development will follow the sloping topography and there are no unique physical features on the site, therefore, no topographic impacts will result. 3. All standard erosion control practices shall be implemented during grading and construction of the proposal and no erosion on or off-site should occur. 4. The area of development, including construction operations, .*- 5. Construction and occupation of the three dwelling units will result in an incremental increase in the production of aerosols, however this short-term, incremental increase is not considered significant. 6. The site surface will be altered, thereby changing the surface moisture and temperature characteristics, however no substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature should result form this in-fill project. 7. While the project borders on Agua Hedionda Lagoon, and a portion of the site is within the 100- year floodplain, the area of development is at least 100 feet from such waters and no alteration in the course or flow of water will result. -6- 8. Construction and occupation of the three unit project will produce an incremental increase in water consumption, however this small increase is considered insignificant and no adverse affect on the quantity and quality or surface water, ground water or public water supply shall occur. 9-10. An incremental increase in the consumption of fossil fuels will result during construction and occupation of the residential project, however this short-term incremental increase is not considered significant. 11. Based upon field visits, no significant archeological, paleontological or historic resources exist with the previously disturbed project area and, therefore, no significant impacts to such resources are anticipated. 12-13. The project area is currently disturbed and does not contain a significant diversity of plants. The proposed new species of plants are typical for those in the developed area of the City and no significant adverse impacts to flora should result. 14. No agricultural crops are grown nor does any farmland exist within the project site, therefore no adverse impacts to such are anticipated. 15-16. The project area is currently disturbed. No significant diversity of animals exist on the project site and the project does not propose to introduce any new species of animals. No significant adverse impacts to fauna should result. HUMAN ENVIRONMENT 17. This three unit residential project is consistent with the underlying land use designation and no alteration to planned land use is proposed or required. 18. The project will incrementally increase the demand for public utilities, schools, police, fire, emergency and other public services, however this incremental increase can be accommodated with the existing systems and services, as required by the City's Growth Management Ordinance. 19. No new or modified waste systems will be required due to the project and no adverse impacts to existing facilities are expected. 20. An incremental increase in noise levels will occur during construction and occupation of the project, however this short-term increase in noise is considered insignificant. 21. No new significant sources of light or glare will be introduced with the project therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. 22. No significant risk of explosions exist and no hazardous substances are proposed to be included in the project. No significant impacts are anticipated. 23-24. The three unit residential project will not substantially alter the density or human population, nor will it affect existing housing, as the property is designated for residential development of this scale. -7- 25-26. The approximately 30 additional average daily trips generated by the project can easily be accommodated by the existing road system and all required parking will be contained on site. No adverse impacts to existing parking facilities should result from the project. 27. No present patterns of circulation traverse the site and the additional traffic generated by the project will not adversely impact existing transportation systems. 28. No waterborne, rail or air traffic use the project area therefore no impacts to such will exist. 29. Standard traffic safety signage and protection measures will be incorporated into the project and, therefore, no significant traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians should occur. 30. No emergency response or emergency evacuation plans involve the project area, therefore no impacts to such are expected. 31. The residential development is designed in accordance with the Agua Hedionda Land Use Plan, thus preserving lagoon views from Adams Street. The project will, therefore, not obstruct a scenic vista nor create an aesthetically offensive public view. 32. No recreational opportunities exist within the area of construction and an easement will be dedicated to provide for a lateral lagoon access trail. No adverse affects to the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities will result. 33. The proposed project does not encroach into any undisturbed areas or areas of environmental significance, therefore it will not degrade the quality of the environment or any ecosystem, nor will it eliminate any examples at California history or prehistory. 34. No significant long-term adverse environmental affects are anticipated with the construction and occupation of this in-fill residential project. 35. All affects of this project are all below the level of significance, therefore they are not cumulatively considerable and no cumulative adverse impacts are expected. 36. The project will provide housing in a residentially-designated neighborhood and all construction must follow all required safety practices, therefore, no substantial adverse effects on human beings is anticipated. -8- ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alternate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. a) Since the entire project is integrated with respect to grading, phasing is not logical nor is it environmentally advantageous. b) The project has been designed with over 100 foot separation from the lagoon and with building heights that continue to allow scenic views. Alternate site designs would not offer the same environmental advantages. c) The scale of the proposed development fits within the constraints of the property and is in keeping with surrounding development. d) The site is designated for residential uses and alternate uses may increase the opportunity for environmental impacts. e) Since the site is a vacant, infill project, no advantages would be gained by postponing development. f) See b and d above. g) See e above. -9- DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: _X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, because the environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is required. Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Signature Date Planning Director LIST MITIGATING MEASURES CIF APPLICABLE") ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CIF APPLICABLE") -10- APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature MG:vd -11- City of Carlsbad CASAS DEL MARISOL PUD 92-05/MS 92-06 Carlsbad Decreed A Legal Newspaper by the Superior Court of San Diego County Mail all correspondence regarding public notice advertising to W.C.C.N. Inc. 2841 Loker Ave. East, Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 431-4850 Proof of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am principal clerk of the printer of the Carlsbad Sun, a newspaper of general circulation, published weekly in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local news and intelligence of a general character, and which newspa- per at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been established, printed and published at regular intervals in the said City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and that the NEGATIVE notice of which the annexed is a printed DECLARATION copy, has been published in each regular TioN°soEuthT 0f AdDams!freLe?Cbt '' and entire issue of said newspaper and not Dr?ve e n atfo'r car°bavde cSunfy"^ in any supplement thereof on the follow- San Diego. i , «. •. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Four mg QateS, lO-Wll. lot residential subdivision withgrading and construction for three single family homes and a private street lot. .limp 10 1O 93The City of Carlsbad has con- _ JUne iU 19 _ ±? ( ducted an environmental review of the above described project pur- suant to the Guidelines for Imple- 1Q mentation of the California En- - - vironmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordi- 1 „ nance of the City of Carlsbad. As a _ 1:7 _ result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant 1 Q impact on the environment) is - - hereby issued for the subject pro- ject. Justification for this action is .. ~ on file in the Planning Department. _ iy _ A copy of the Negative Declara- tion with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, °7LaPaSc°a7,ifoLraniaP92ooa9S commemffrom I certify under penalty of perjury that the the public are invited. Please sub- . ,mit comments in writing to the foregoing is true and correct. Executed atPlanning Department within 30 Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California on the 10th Dated: June 8. 1993 ' liino 1QQ?Case .No: PUD 92WMS 92-06 day Of _ OUIIG, 1JJO Case Name: Casas Del Marisol MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Planning DirectorCJ 6017: June 10. 1993 Clerk of the Printer