HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 04-04; Roosevelt Street Apartments; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (2)August 26, 2005
TO: BUILDING DEPARTMENT
FROM: Assistant Planner, Housing and Redevelopment Department
ROOSEVELT STREET APRTMENTS - RP04-04
2578 ROOSEVELT STREET
PLAN CHECK (PC050095)
I have reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. The following items must be
addressed before the Housing and Redevelopment Department can support the issuance ofthe
permit:
1. The Developer shall provide proof to the Director from the Carlsbad School District that
this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities.
2. The Developer shall submit and obtain approval of a Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan
showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's
Landscape Manual.
3. Roof pitch as approved is required to be a minimum of 5:12. Please revise plan
accordingly.
4. Roofing over electric meter enclosure differs from approved plans. Refer to Sheet A1.7.
Please revise plans accordingly.
5. Fire sprinkler riser cabinet door differs from approved plans. Refer to Sheet A1.7 &
A2.7. Please revise plans accordingly.
This information has been entered into Permits Plus. If you have any questions about the
above information, please call me at extension 2813.
CLIFF JONES
REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT
REVIEW AND COMMENT REOUEST
Date: July 23, 2004
V Planning Department - D. NEU Water District
V Engineering Department - D. Rick Police Department
Building Department - P. KELLEY Scliool District
V Fire Department - G. RYAN North County Transit District
Landscape Plancheck Consultant - L. BLACK City Attorney
To Departments: Subject: RP 04-04
The attached plans and corresponding application for a Major Redevelopment Permit have been
submitted for property located at 2578 Roosevelt Street. Please review the attached documents.
If all remaining issues have been resolved please forward final conditions to my office by
August 26,2004.. Thank you for your assistance.
Project Title:
PermitNo.:
Applicant:
Roosevelt Street Apartments
RP 04-04
Wakeland Housing and Development Corp.
Brief Description of Proposal: This is the project's third submittal. The subject property was
purchased by the Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency with the purpose of constructing an
affordable housing project. Wakeland Housing is assisting us in this effort and is processing the
application for an 11-unit affordable apartment project. The site is currently vacant.
Assigned staff member: Craig Ruiz
Comments: {Please e-mail/send comments to Craig Ruiz in the Housing & Redevelopment
Department.) p
uiBKEinnp
HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
July 21, 2004
Mr. Craig Ruiz
Carlsbad Housing and Redevelopment Department
2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B
Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389
Re: Roosevelt Gardens -Minor Redevelopment Permit # RP04-04
Dear Craig:
Wakeland Housing and Development Corporation is hereby resubmitting revised
architectural and engineering drawings in application for the above permit. All
comments provided by City departments have been addressed in these drawings.
Please let us know when the Design Review Board meeting is scheduled, as we need lead
time to develop the additional materials 2 weeks prior to that date. We hope that we can
obtain approvals from that body and the City Council within the next 60 days.
Wakeland's design team would then immediately move to complete the design process
and obtain its financing commitments. Depending on the City review of the final
construction drawings, we believe we could begin construction sometime next spring.
Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Barry Getzel
Senior Project Manager
625 Broadway - Suite 1000 • San Diego, CA 92101 • Ph.: 619 . 235 . 2296 > Fax: 619 . 235 . 5386
CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
June 16, 2004
TO: Craig Ruiz - IHousing and Redevelopment Department
FROM: David Rick - PW, Development Services
ISSUES REVIEW
PROJECT ID: RP 04-04 CARLSBAD VILLAGE AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The Engineering Department has completed its review of the above referenced project for
compliance with the previously determined issues. The project still has issues that must be
addressed. The following is a list of these issues:
1. Add striping and a "no parking" sign in the area for vehicular turn around. In addition, for
vehicles backing out of parking stalls 20 and 21, extend the driveway back up area to
the wail located at the property line.
2. The location of the sewer lateral is inconsistent between the site plan and grading plan.
Please revise accordingly. Do not connect a 4 inch lateral to the access hole.
3. Add a separate water line and double detector check valve for the required sprinkler
system. Locate the DDC Valve on private property but in a location accessible to the
Fire Department.
4. City Standard GS-15 requires the drainage swale to be located a minimum 5 feet away
from the building foundation. Along the southerly and easterly boundary, the proposed
drainage swale is located closer than the standard permits. Either correct the design to
comply or submit a letter/revised soils report from the soils engineer stating that a lesser
distance is acceptable and provide specifications.
5. On the grading plan, correct the vertical scale on Section A and B. In addition, the
retaining wall height and grade differential is difficult to determine on cross section A.
Please provide elevations. Aiso, is the neighbor's wall as deep into the ground as
indicated?
6. The text is difficult to read in some areas. Please revise per the redlined plan.
Please forward the attached redlined plan the applicant and tell them to return it with their
next submittal. If you or the applicant has any questions regarding the above, please either see
or call me at extension 2781.
David Rick, Assistant Engineer - Engineering Development Services Division
June 13, 2005
TO: BUILDING DEPARTMENT
FROM: Assistant Planner, Housing and Redevelopment Department
ROOSEVELT STREET APRTMENTS - RP04-04
PLAN CHECK (CB051825)
I have reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. The Housing and Redevelopment
Department supports the issuance of the building permit. However, prior to issuance of the next
building permit the following conditions of approval must be satisfied:
1. The Developer shall provide proof to the Director from the Carlsbad School District that
this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities.
2. The Developer shall submit and obtain approval of a Final Landscape and Irrigation Plan
showing conformance with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's
Landscape Manual.
3. The Developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of
the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Housing and Redevelopment
Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of
Carlsbad has issued a Major Redevelopment Permit by Resolution No. 299 on the real
property owned by the Developer. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property
description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of
approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of
Restriction. The Housing and Redevelopment Director has the authority to execute and
record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a
showing of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest.
This information has been entered into Permits Plus. If you have any questions about the
above information, please call me at extension 2813.
CLIFF JONES
c: Wakeland Housing & Development Corporation, LLC
LJBKEtnnD
HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
April 23, 2004
Craig Ruiz
City ofCarlsbad
Housing and Redevelopment Department
2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B
Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389
Re: Roosevelt Gardens - 2578 Roosevelt Street
Dear Craig:
Wakeland Housing and Development Corporation is hereby resubmitting design and engineering
materials in application for a redevelopment permit related to the above property. This
resubmittal is in accord with comments made by city departments that were attached to your
correspondence ofMareh 9.
The materials we are submitting are as follows:
1. A copy of the city comments of March 9.
2. The redlined copies of the previously submitted hydrology and water quality
technical reports.
3. The redlined copy of the previously submitted landscape plan.
4. Revised hydrology and water quality technical reports.
5. Five (5) copies of full size revised architectural (site plan, floor plans and
elevations), engineering (grading plans) and landscape plans, as well as an aerial
photograph of the site and the surrounding area.
Please note that, at the request of the Carlsbad Engineering Department, we have attempted to
contact neighbors to the rear ofthe property (2605 and 2615 Madison Street). The objective was
to determine the preference of those property owners with respect to the drainage of the subject
property. The property owners were asked whether they would prefer one of the following
drainage altematives: 1) the subject property continues to drain over their property or 2) the
subject be raised to accommodate a drainage flow toward Roosevelt Street. Telephonic messages
and written correspondence were delivered to both residences. As of this date, we have not
received a response from either property owner. Consequently, we have assumed that the
property owners would prefer altemative #2 and have designed accordingly.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincere
Barry
Senior Project Manager
625 Broadway > Suite 611 - San Diego, CA 92101 • Ph.: 619 . 235 . 2296 • Fax: 619 . 235 . 5386
Citv of Carlsbad
Housing & Redevelopment Department
MARCH 9, 2004
BARRY GETZEL
WAKELAND HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT CORP.
625 BROADWAY, SUITE 611
SAN DIEGO.CA 92101
Re: Rosevelt Street Apartments- 2578 Roosevelt Street
Thank you for applying for a land use permit in the City of Carlsbad. The Housing &
Redevelopment Department along with all other appropriate departments have
reviewed your minor redevelopment permit, application no. RP04-04, as to its
completeness for processing.
The application is complete as submitted. Although the initial processing of your
application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by
the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the
application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or othenA/ise, supplement the basic
information required forthe application.
In an effort to continue to process the application in the most expeditious manner as
possible, a list of issues identified by staff during the initial project review phase has
been included with this correspondence.
Please contact my office at (760) 434-2817, if you have any questions or wish to set up
a meeting to discuss the proposed project.
Sincerely,
CRAIG D. RUIZ
Management Analyst
enclosures
2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037
ISSUES OF CONCERN
Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced
project for completeness and engineering issues of concern. All items needed for
engineering review are provided for determining the application as complete.
Engineering issues which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff
making a determination on the proposed project are as follows:
1. On the grading and site plan, indicate with a note that the existing driveways
to be removed will be replaced with curb and gutter except where the
proposed driveway is located.
2. Because the driveway aisle exceeds 150 feet in length, provide an area for
vehicular turn around so that a vehicle can make a three point turn or better.
In addition, include an additional 5 feet of driveway back up area for vehicles
backing out of parking stalls 20 and 21.
3. Locate the sewer lateral and cleanout outside the driveway and indicate the
diameter of the street main and proposed lateral. According to the site plan,
a lateral already exists off the manhole. Can this lateral be used? Show this
lateral on the grading plan. Also, indicate the size of the existing water
lateral, meter and main. The line and meter may need to be upgraded.
4. Identify the location of the nearest fire hydrant. Also, if fire sprinklers are
required, add a separate water line and double detector check valve for the
sprinkler system. Locate the DDC Valve on private property but in a location
accessible to the Fire Department.
5. Have you contacted abutting property owners about the feasibility of draining
across their properties? Maintaining the drainage patterns similar to existing
patterns should be explored as an alternative to raising the grade.
6. City Standard GS-15 requires the drainage swale to be located a minimum 5
feet away from the building foundation. The proposed drainage swale is
located closer than the standard permits. Either correct the design to comply
or submit a letter/revised soils report from the soils engineer stating that a
lesser distance is acceptable and provide specifications.
7. On the grading plan, add a concrete pattern/symbol wherever concrete is
proposed.
8. According to the soils report, remedial grading at depths between 1 and 5
feet will be required. Include the estimated amount of remedial grading in
cubic yards on the grading plan. Also, identify the approximate location of
the septic tank
9. Provide % grade at the street gutter.
10. On the site plan:
a. Add the ADT to the site plan. 11 units X 6 ADT/unit = 66 ADT.
b. Place the '8.00 ft.' between the leader arrows of the public sidewalk
easement.
c. Show the complete legend, as part of it did not copy. Correct the
location of Roosevelt Street on the Vicinity map. It's currently shown
where State Street is shown.
1. On the grading plan, show existing drainage patterns on the neighboring
properties. Also, identify the height of the wall along the rear property line
of the abutting property shown in cross section "A".
2. Construct the trash enclosure to City Standard GS-16. It appears that a
ramp exists between the enclosure and driveway. What is the grade of this
ramp? The loading area shall be level.
3. Correct the "Drainage and Hydrology Study" and "Water Pollution Control Plan"
as noted on the attached redlined plan.
Enclosed are two redlined plans. Please return these plans with your next
submittal. If you or the applicant has any questions, please either see or contact me at
602-2781.
Housing & Redevelopment:
1. Please submit 5 sets of revised plans to the Housing & Redevelopment
Department addressing the above-identified issues and include the following
information on the site plan:
A. Application types submitted - Major Redevelopment Permit RP04-04
B. Number of parking spaces required/provided.
C. Name of sewer, water and school district providing service to the project.
D. Approximate location of existing and proposed building and permanent
structures onsite and within 100 feet of site.
E. Location of all major vegetation, showing size and type, both within the
project and offsite for a distance of 150 feet. Existing onsite trees; those to
be removed and those to be saved.
F. Provide square footages of Building Two.
2. Building No. 1 shows a front yard set back of 15.69'. The maximum setback is
15'. The increased setback will require approval of a variance. Is it possible to
modify the location of the building to eliminate the need for a variance?
3. Building No. 1 shows side yard set backs along the south property line of 4' - 5'
and Building No. 2 shows set backs of 9'. The minimum set back is 10% of the
lot width, or 10.9'. The reduced setback will require approval of a variance. Is it
possible to modify the location to eliminate the need for a variance?
4. The project requires 24 parking spaces. Is it possible to utilize the westerly area
of the site to provide additional parking spaces to eliminate the need for a
variance or reduce the intensity of the variance being requested?
5. The northwest corner of the site has a significant landscape area. Is it possible
to incorporate a monument sign and/or and entry feature/statement in this area?
This will provide an opportunity to screen the parking and to given the project a
greater street presence.
6. Indicate the roof pitch on building elevations. A minimum 5:12 roof pitch is
required.
7. It is recommended that enhanced architectural features be added to all
elevations.
8. There are several blank wall areas along the side and rear elevations of both
buildings. Enhanced architectural features be added to these elevations
9. As soon as ail issues are resolved to the satisfaction of all departments the
project will be scheduled for a Design Review Board hearing. To help expedite
the processing of the permit application the following information is being
provided. The following items will be required for the hearing:
A. One (1) copy of a full-sized (24" x 36") colored site plan. (Needed 2 weeks
prior to hearing date.)
B. One (1) copy of full-sized (24" x 36") colored building elevations accurately
depicting the proposed mature landscaping and how it relates to the building.
(Needed 2 weeks prior to hearing date.)
C. Ten (10) sets of full size plans folded to 8>2" x 11". (Needed 2 weeks prior to
hearing date.)
D. One (1) set of SVz" x 11" black and white reduced plans. (Needed 2 weeks
prior to hearing date.)
E. An 8V2" x 11" construction materials board and color samples showing
roofing, exterior walls, trim, etc. (Needed 2 weeks prior to hearing date.)
Please let me know if you would like to arrange a meeting to discuss these items in
further detail.
Fire Department
1. Project conditions: (Note: This commentary identifies specific conditions
necessary to achieve Fire Department approval.)
2. FIRE - shall require that each of the two buildings have installed an approved
automatic fire sprinkler system designed to NFPA standard 13 R.
3. Each of these buildings shall be required to provide for an accessible closet for
the A/S Riser. This closet shall be designed with a minimally dimensioned full
height man door of 24 x 78 inches.
4. This closet shall also be accessible to fire department personnel from an exterior
path without intervening rooms or private spaces.
5. The addressing of each building shall be visible from the street to which they are
addressed, with numbering to meet current City of Carlsbad regulations.
6. Code reminders: (Note: This commentary is provided to assist the applicant,
and identifies minimum code requirements that are frequently overlooked
Building Department
1. Accessible parking must be a van accessible space.
2. How will tenants access water heaters in the common equipment room on
second floor?
Landscape Architect
1. Please see attached redlined plans. Redline plans must be return with the next
project submittal.
Memorancium
TO: Craig Ruiz - Housing and Redevelopment
FROM: David Rick - Engineering Department
DATE: March 4, 2004
RP 04-04 CARLSBAD VILLAGE AFFORDABLE HOUSING
COMPLETNESS AND ISSUES REVIEW
Engineering Department staff has completed a review of the above-referenced project
for completeness and engineering issues of concern. All items needed for engineering
review are provided for determining the application as complete. Engineering issues
which need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a
determination on the proposed project are as follows:
1. On the grading and site plan, indicate with a note that the existing driveways to
be removed will be replaced with curb and gutter except where the proposed
driveway is located.
2. Because the driveway aisle exceeds 150 feet in length, provide an area for
vehicular turn around so that a vehicle can make a three point turn or better. In
addition, include an additional 5 feet of driveway back up area for vehicles
backing out of parking stalls 20 and 21.
3. Locate the sewer lateral and cleanout outside the driveway and Indicate the
diameter of the street main and proposed lateral. According to the site plan, a
lateral already exists off the manhole. Can this lateral be used? Show this lateral
on the grading plan. Also, indicate the size of the existing water lateral, meter
and main. The line and meter may need to be upgraded.
4. Identify the location of the nearest fire hydrant. Also, if fire sprinklers are
required, add a separate water line and double detector check valve for the
sprinkler system. Locate the DDC Valve on private property but in a location
accessible to the Fire Department.
5. Have you contacted abutting property owners about the feasibility of draining
across their properties? Maintaining the drainage patterns similar to existing
patterns should be explored as an alternative to raising the grade.
6. City Standard GS-15 requires the drainage swale to be located a minimum 5 feet
away from the building foundation. The proposed drainage swale is located
closer than the standard permits. Either correct the design to comply or submit a
letter/revised soils report from the soils engineer stating that a lesser distance is
acceptable and provide specifications.
7. On the grading plan, add a concrete pattern/symbol wherever concrete is
proposed.
8. According to the soils report, remedial grading at depths between 1 and 5 feet
will be required. Include the estimated amount of remedial grading in cubic yards
on the grading plan. Also, identify the approximate location ofthe septic tank
9. Provide % grade at the street gutter.
10. On the site plan:
a. Add the ADT to the site plan. 11 units X 6 ADT/unit = 66 ADT.
b. Place the '8.00 ft.' between the leader arrows of the public sidewalk
easement.
c. Show the complete legend, as part of it did not copy. Correct the location
of Roosevelt Street on the Vicinity map. It's currently shown where State
Street is shown.
11. On the grading plan, show existing drainage patterns on the neighboring
properties. Also, identify the height of the wall along the rear property line of the
abutting property shown in cross section "A".
12. Construct the trash enclosure to City Standard GS-16. It appears that a ramp
exists between the enclosure and driveway. What is the grade of this ramp? The
loading area shall be level.
13. Correct the "Drainage and Hydrology Study" and "Water Pollution Control Plan"
as noted on the attached redlined plan.
Enclosed are two redlined plans. Please return these plans with your next
submittal. If you or the applicant has any questions, please either see or contact me at
602-2781.
DAVID RICK
Assistant Engineer
Engineering Development Services Division
uiBKEinnD
^ HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION nEl/Lliy^i
FEB 0 9 2004
Febmary 5, 2004
Ms. Lori H. Rosenstein
Carlsbad Redevelopment & Housing Department
2965 Roosevelt Street, Suite B
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Lori:
I am hereby submitting Wakeland's application for a redevelopment permit, along with the
required design materials and studies, with regard to the development of the City owned parcel
on 2578 Roosevelt Avenue. Since the City currently owns the site, we were not in a position to
submit an updated title report, which the City can order.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Barry Getzel
Senior Project Manager
625 Broadway • Suite 611 - San Diego, CA 92101 • Ph.: 619 . 235 . 2296 • Fax: 619 . 235 . 5386