The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRP 04-11; Lincoln & Oak Mixed Use; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (5)XVL MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the |^ ^ quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually [ [ [ [ [ [ jSQ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will [ [ [ | [ | cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EER or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project. Rev. 06/2000 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Please use this area to discuss any of the environmental factors that were checked "No impact" yet lack any information citations and any factors that were checked "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." The City has adopted a "Statement of Overriding Consideration" with regard to' air quality and circulation impacts resulting from the normal buildout according to the General Plan. The following sample text is intended to guide your discussion of the impacts to these environmental factors. AIR OUALITY: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage altemative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan air quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approvaL Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. CIRCULATION: The implementation of subsequent projects that are consistent with and included in the updated 1994 General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. 10 Rev. 06/2000 t To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include 1) measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checldist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. LIST QF MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE) 11 Rev. 06/2000 t • SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FORM FOR ALL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS • APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY REGULAR & MINOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS (Application cfiecklist for t^lorhSingle Family Flegular Coastal Devehpmentf^ennitscov^ This supplemental application is to be filed for any development requiring a Coastal Development Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad. I. GENERAL BACKGROUND A. Estimated Cost of Development: Development costing $60,000 or more does not qualify as a Minor Coastal Development Permit. The Planning Director shall make the final determination regarding a project's cost of development. The primary basis for determining cost of development will be the application of dollar costs per square foot for different types of residential construction. These costs are set by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) and are applied throughout San Diego County. Please complete the following information to assist in the determination of this project's cost of development (Contractor proposals may also be submitted for consideration by ttie Planning Director). New Residential Square Footage: 22 j^fi^ square feet x $78.00/sq. ft. = $ \j1^2 ^44^ => Residential Addition Square Footage: square feet x $94.00/sq. ft. = $ => Any Garage Square Footage: g;^(^7 square feet x $22.00/sq. ft. = $ ^74^ > ^ => Residential Conversion Square Footage: square feet x $26.00/sq. ft. = $ For Non-Residential Uses, use the following figures for calculations: Retail/Store @ $38.00/sq. ft.; Restaurant @ $69.00/ sq. ft.; Office @ $55.00/ sq. ft.; Manufacturing/Warehouse @ $24.00/sq. ft.: square feet x $ Sfi^/sq. ft. = $ •7^^'^2,^ COST OF DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE: $ I ^ ®6 - <5lc> B. Do you wish to apply for: 1. A Minor Coastal Development Permit (Under $60,000) 2. A Regular Coastal Development Permit ($60,000 or more) y<^ C. Street address of proposed development Form 15 1/01 Page lof 8 D. Assessor's Parcel Number of proposed development Development Description: Briefly describe proiect:A M\^<gD t>4^ ?gr>A-^/^nA4W^ Describe the present land uses (i.e. Vacant land, single family homes, apartments, offices, etc.) that surround the proposed development to the: North: /^CPf^Zr^^t^^^irr^ South: Af='MgT1MB6^^ East: AcPftgTt^A^g^^.^ ftgP«wXl»..r!gt^ ^AMi^ West: 1g\36\t^>1^^ Aryiftgrruc^j^^ V\r»figi^ G. Is project located within a 100 year flood plain? I IVes ^ No PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY A. Are there existing structures on the property? I^Yes | | No If yes, please describe. B. Will any existing structure be removed/demolished? l^Yes | | No If yes to either question, describe the extent of the demolition or removal, including the relocation site, if applicable (also show on plans). III. LOT COVERAGE A. Existing and Proposed Existing New Proposed Total Building Coverage sq. ft. 2^i$3_sq. ft. <!^3£3_sq. ft. Landscaped Area sq. ft. Z^oB^ .<^q. ft. i^ 0S(n sq. ft. Hardscape Area £^2. sq. ft. ^442 so. ft. Unimproved Area (Left Natural) sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. Form 15 1/01 Page 2 of 8