The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRP 06-03; Roosevelt Center; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (2)March 11, 2009 TO: Brent Reisinger, R&R, phone: (619) 507-5839, e-mail: brent@rrconstruciton.com Austin Silva, Assistant Planner Christine Wauschek, Building Department Janean Hawney, Building Department Pete Dreibeibis, Senior Building Inspector Michele Masterson, Senior Management Analyst Meghan Jacobson, Senior Office Specialist FROM: Michael Elliott, Landscape Architect Consultant to the City of Carlsbad (760) 944-8463 PELA file: 71 - Roosevelt Center - Inspl REFERENCE: 1^^ Landscape Inspection PROJECT: Roosevelt Center Project Number: RP 06-03 Drawing Number: 452-5L 560 Carlsbad Village Drive - CB073141 The following items were noted as deficient and in need of correction: 560 Carlsbad Village Drive - CB073141 1. The contractor/developer is reminded that planting and irrigation record drawings (as- builts) will be required to be completed and approved by the City prior to bond release. 2. The contractor/developer is reminded that the landscape architect of work shall review/inspect the project and submit the "fmal landscape certification form" prior to bond release. This form may be filled out and faxed to Mike Elliott at (760) 944-8943. 3. Permit card was signed on March 11, 2009. City of Carlsbad Housing & Redevelopment Department November 19, 2008 RICHARD & RICHARD CONSTRUCTION ATTN: GARY SEWARD 234 VENTURE STREET SUITE 100 SAN MARCOS, CA 92078 Subject: Roosevelt Center, Major Redevelopment Permit RP 06-03 Dear Gary: Thank you for submitting a letter to our department requesting changes to the fencing for the Roosevelt Center project. The decorative low wall clad in stone that is proposed is found to be in substantial conformance to the previous proposed wall. Although the wall that is proposed on the neighboring property to the south is not part of this project, it can be allowed as long as the fence does not exceed six (6) feet in height measured from the lowest grade on the property. The Housing and Redevelopment Department is looking forward to the completion of this project. Please contact me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, Austin Silva Assistant Planner 2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2397 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037 @ R&R Construction Company, Inc. Commercial • Residentiai • Design Build RICHARD & RICHARD City of Carlsbad Redevelopment 2965 Roosevelt St., ste B Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 760-434-2815 Att: Austin Silva Assistant Planner Dear Mr. Silva, Roosevelt Mix use project would like to propose the additional items to their project currently under construction. In order to have the restaurant to comply with the ABC and increase our marketability for an upscale restaurant, we will need to provide a decorative low wall clad in stone to match the building with a small wrought iron fence on top to a height of max. 48" AFF. The owner of the adjoining retail center has also asked us to install a fence on his property which will help both sides give a much fmished look by screening his back area and providing security for him. We propose a composite fence by Veranda or Equivalent. It is a premium vinyl composite fence to 6'-0" in height fi-om the lowest grade of his property. The color will be Tuscan walnut. Not only is this made of entire recycle product, it will last and look better for years to come. We ask your consideration in approving both of these minor additions to help enhance our project as well as enhance the image for the City as well. We thank you for your consideration in these matters, Gary M. Seward Architect 234 Venture Street • Suite 100 • San iVIarcos • CA 92078 • Piione 760-759-2260 • Fax 760-759-2269 City of Carlsbad Housing & Redevelopment Department August 20, 2008 RICHARD & RICHARD CONSTRUCTION ATTN: GARY SEWARD 234 VENTURE STREET SUITE 100 SAN MARCOS, CA 92078 Subject: Roosevelt Center, Major Redevelopment Permit RP 06-03 Dear Gary: There have been changes made to the above mentioned project since the project was approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission on July 10, 2007. The changes include: 1. A reconfiguration of the ground floor retail and restaurant spaces, and location of the residential parking garages which resulted in no additional parking being required. 2. An enclosure of the retail foyer and removal of a water feature along Carlsbad Village Drive. 3. A change to the color scheme and roofing materials. All of the above mentioned changes are found to be substantially conforming to the original approved set of plans dated March 29, 2007 (Design Review Board). Please contact my office at (760) 434-2813 if you have any questions regarding the infomiation contained in this letter. Sincerely, Austin Silva' Assistant Planner 2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2397 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037 ^ City of Carlsbad Public Works Engineering November 14, 2007 Richard & Richard 234 Venture Street San Marcos, CA 92078 COMPLETION OF GRADING PLANCHECK PROJECT ID: RP 06-03 DWG NO.: 452-5A GR NO.: 070059 PROJECT NAME: Rooseveit Center The Grading Plancheck process has been completed for the project noted above. The following information will assist you in completing the next steps in obtaining the required grading permit. Our records indicate your project is clear for grading permit issuance provided the foliowing items are completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. If you have not already done so, please submit these items to the Engineering Development Services counter at 1635 Faraday Avenue. 1. Grading permit application (enclosed) submitted within 18 months of the date of mylar signing (see www.carlsbadca.gov/engineering for current version of forms) 2. Four copies (two full size and two 11" x 17") ofthe approved grading plans 3. A copy of this letter 4. Pay additional plancheck and inspection fees in the amount of $1884.75 After complying with the requirements listed above, you will be provided with contact information for scheduling the preconstruction meeting with a Public Works Inspector. The Inspector wiil give you your copy of the grading permit at the preconstruction meeting. Please do not beain construction until vou have received vour permit from the Public Works Inspector. Additionally, the following items may be required during the construction of your project. Please coordinate the timing of these items with your Inspector. 1. An approved haul route permit prior to hauling any construction equipment or materials onsite or offsite 2. An approved traffic control plan and a valid right-of-way permit prior to performing any work in the public right of way (allow two weeks for approval) 3. A retaining wall permit from the Building Department As part of the Grading Plancheck process, the City Engineer signed the grading plans for the project noted above. These plans are now the property of the City of Carlsbad and have been filed for permanent record with this office. You may obtain copies and other reproductions at your cost through one of several bonded reprographic firms in the area. Doc ER-02-04 10/15/2007 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602-8562 ^ Richard & Richard November 14, 2007 Page 2 of 2 Approval of these plans by the City of Carlsbad does not authorize the applicant to violate any federal, state, or city laws, ordinances, regulations, or policies. Also, issuance of your grading permit is subject to the limitations and requirements of City ordinances, policies, and regulations; your conditions of approval, if any; and all required state and federal agency permits and approvals including, but not limited to, the California Department of Fish and Game, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, California Coastal Commission, and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. It has been a pleasure working with you through the plancheck process. If you have any questions, please contact me at 760-602-2733 or via email at tlevy@ci.carlsbad.ca.us. Respectfully, Tecla Levy, Associate Engineer Enclosures: Grading Permit Application Right of Way Permit Application Package Fee Summary Listing cc: Engineer of Work Project Planner: Austin Silva Inspection: Office Specialist Engineering Counter File Doc ER-02-04 10/15/2007 ity of Carlsbad Housing & Redevelopment Department October 30, 2007 RICHARD & RICHARD CONSTRUCTION ATTN: RICHARD WOOLSLEY 234 VENTURE STREET SUITE 100 SAN MARCOS, CA 92078 SUBJECT: Roosevelt Center (RP 06-03) APN: APN 203-292-15,16, 17, & 19 Dear Richard: In accordance with the conditions of approval for the above referenced project, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the developer must submit a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Major Redevelopment Permit on the real property. I have enclosed said notice which must be signed and notarized according to the directions contained on the signature page. Please sign the enclosed document and return to me for processing and recordation. I realize that you have already signed this document previously. However, a section that was left out has been inserted so the document can now been recorded once it is signed by the appropriate people. I apologize for any inconveniences. Please contact my office at (760) 434-2813, if you have any questions regarding the information contained in this letter. Sincerely, AUSTIN SILVA Assistant Planner 2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2335 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037 ^ (?ity of Carlsbad Housing & Redevelopment Department July 13, 2007 RICHARD & RICHARD CONSTRUCTION 234 VENTURE STREET SUITE 100 SAN MARCOS, CA 92078 SUBJECT: Roosevelt Center (RP 06-03) APN: APN 203-292-15,16, 17, & 19 Dear Richard: In accordance with the conditions of approval for the above referenced project, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the developer must submit a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Major Redevelopment Permit on the real property. I have enclosed said notice which must be signed and notarized according to the directions contained on the signature page. Please sign the enclosed document and return to me for processing and recordation. Please contact my office at (760) 434-2813, if you have any questions regarding the information contained in this letter. Sincerely, AUSTIN SILVA Assistant Planner 2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037 @ City of Carlsbad Housing & Redevelopment Department July 11,2007 RICHARD & RICHARD CONSTRUCTION 234 VENTURE STREET SUITE 100 SAN MARCOS, CA 92078 SUBJECT: Roosevelt Center (RP 06-03/CDP 06-09) APN 203-292-15. 16, 17, & 19 Dear Richard: As you are aware, on July 10, 2007 the Housing and Redevelopment Commission conditionally approved Major Redevelopment Permit No. RP 06-03 and Coastal Development Permit No. 06-09 for property located at 560 & 562 Carlsbad Village Drive. Enclosed please find a signed copy of the final resolutions of approval for the proposed apailment project. These resolutions contain the conditions of approval for the project. I have also enclosed a stamped set of the approved plans referenced in the resolution as Exhibits A-l. Your next step is to obtain the appropriate grading and building permits to construct the proposed project. Please note many of the conditions of approval must be satisfied prior to the issuance of building permit. It has been a very rewarding experience working with you on this project. I congratulate you on the approval of the project and I wish you much success in your future endeavors. If you have any questions and/or comments regarding this correspondence, please contact my office at (760) 434-2813. Sincerely, AUSTIN SILVA Assistant Planner Enclosures 2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037 @ City of Carlsbad Housing & Redevelopment Department July 11, 2007 RICHARD & RICHARD CONSTRUCTION 234 VENTURE STREET SUITE 100 SAN MARCOS, CA 92078 Re: County Clerk Filing Fee (RP 06-03) Dear Richard: As you are aware, on July 10, 2007 the Housing and Redevelopment Commission conditionally approved Major Redevelopment Permit No. RP 06-03 and Coastal Development Permit No. 06-09 for property located at 560 & 562 Carlsbad Village Drive. An environmental review is required for ail land use permit applications, in which this project was exempt from any CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review. As part of the exemption process, the lead agency (City of Carlsbad) is required to file a Notice of Exemption with the San Diego County Clerk. As of January 1, 2007, the County Clerk is now charging a documentaiy handling fee of $50. According to our records, we have not collected the $50 for the County Clerk documentary filing fee. Until the fee is collected and the Notice of Exemption can be filed, any local pennits issued for the project are invalid. Please send a check made out to the San Diego County Clerk in the amount of $50 to the Housing and Redevelopment office in order for us to resend the Notice of Exemption to be recorded and filed. I apologize for any inconveniences. I have attached a copy of the letter from the office of the San Diego County Clerk as well as the Notice of Exemption. If you have any questions regarding the informafion contained in this letter, please contact my office at (760) 434-2813. Sincerely, AUSTIN SILVA Assistant Planner 2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037 ® 574 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, Califomia 92008 March 29, 2007 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CityofCarlsbad 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, Califorma 92008 RE: RP 06-03/CDP 06/09 "Roosevelt Center" Dear Chairman and Members of the Design Review Board, As an adjacent business owner to this proposed project, I would like to request that you impose some conditions upon this developer during the construction phase of the project. My concems are as follows: 1. The amount of dust and debris which will be generated during demotition, grading, and constmction. 2. The loudness of any noise generated during this phase. 3. The hours when work will be allowed. 4. The visibility of the work. (Perhaps some type of screen could be installed.) 5. The anticipated length of time fi-om the initial demolition to the completion of the project. This project will certainly be an enhancement to our downtown village area, and I would urge you to approve this project, with the above additional conditions. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerly yours, / Y Faith, Owner Naflcy Shear Magic Salon July 9, 2007 To: Carlsbad Viiiage Business Owners located near the proposed Roosevelt Center (Black Whale Lighting Building and adjacent parking lot) Subject: PubUc Hearing at the City Coundl Meeting - Tuesday. July 10^ at 6:00 p.m. Dear Fellow Business Owners: As a busmess owner located immediately adjacent to the proposed Roosevelt Center, I have serious concerns about the City's approval of the Parkmg In-Lieu Fee Partidpation for the Roosevelt Center. While the Rooseveit Center project appears to be a positive enhancement to our downtown village area, there are no plans for the project to Indude any on-site paridng for its I0»582 square feet of office, retail and restaurant space. The project will eliminate the current 14 on-site parking spaces, and rely totally on public parking for their office tenants, restaurant and retail employees, and patrons. The City Redevelopment Agency and the Design Review Board have already approved the project induding the parking in-lieu program participation for this project. This means big revenue fo.^ the City estimated at an additional $36,400 In annual tax revenue and Parking In- Lieu fees for ,63 public parkmg spaces at $11,240 each totaling $708,120. My concerns are: • There is already a parking shortage in the Village compounded by overflow from the Coaster Station and the Farmer's Market. • There are only a combined total of 106 parking spaces in the two public parking lots on Roosevelt Street between Carlsbad Village Drive and Grand Avenue. According to the last parking study conducted by the City In February these lots are used to 81% of capacity. So, where are the 63 available pubiic parking spaces to accommodate the Roosevelt Center's parking needs? • The finsncial impact on our businesses (and the Roosevelt Center) if patrons can't find a place to park. I have attached a copy of the PubUc Hearing Agenda Bill (less the attachments) for your review. The City Counci/meeting on Tuesday evening is lhe iast chance to voice eonaams regarding die Rooseveit Center and ttieir Paridng In-Lieu Fee Partidpation. i urge you to attend and speaic out if you shar^ my concerns. Sincerely, Mary Ja:obsc Owner. ISeachI City Smoothies 594 Carlsbaa Village Drive (760) 729-OOn City of Carlsbad DEVELOPMENT SERVICES-ENGINEERING Date: 12/12/2006 To: Richard & Richard Constmction (Agent) 234 Ventura Street, Suite 100 San Marcos, CA 92078 c/o: Gary Seward From: Chris Scobba, Associate Engineer Subject: Redevelopment Permit (RP), RP 06-03. (See also: CDP 06-09) Re: Third Review for Completeness and Initial Engineering Issues Applicant: Thomas Hurley, Richard Woolsey, Marlin Leisher (Owners) 1015 Chestnut Ave, #F2 Carisbad, CA 92008 Project Name/ Address: Mr. Seward, Roosevelt Center (APN 203-292-15-17 &19-00) / 560-562 Carisbad Village Drive, Carisbad, CA 92008 Attached, please find a list of engineering issues. Given that responses to preceding review issues were only provided for the issues associated with the Storm Water Management Plan report; if the next submittal does not comply one of the three scenarios provided below, the next submittal will be rejected and a meeting will be scheduled with the project applicant to conclusively resolve any remaining issues. As previously requested, please include with the next submittal a formal written response to each issue identified within the attached engineering issues under a separate cover/letter, and/or adjacent to hand written comments on the plans and reports, if not identified in the formal issue letter according to one of the following three scenarios: 1) . You agree with the issue and have provided a formal response to how it has been addressed and have provided appropriate documentation to substantiate the resolution of the issue, with proper reference tp location in the documentation. 2) . You agree with the issue as identified but are unable to comply and have formally provided a rational justification and a time fi-ame under which the issue can/will be resolved. 3) . You disagree with the issue as stated, or feel that your design has been misinterpreted. All scenario 3 issues must be resolved prior to the next submittal ofthe subject review documents. This is necessary to adequately address each engineering issue and to minimize impacts to schedule due to unecessary review cycles. RP 06-03 Issues Cover (Third Review) Page 1 of2 12/12/2006 RP 06-03-Roosevelt Center December 12, 2006 Third Review If you, the engineer, or the owner has any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (760) 602- 2747. Respectfiilly, Chris Scobba, PE Associate Engineer Development Services Attachments: RP 06-03 Engineering Issues cc: File Deputy City Engineer, David Hauser Cliff Jones, Assistant Planner, City of Carlsbad Housing & Redevelopment Department RP 06-03 Issues Cover (Third Review) Page 2 of 2 12/12/2006 ROOSEVELT CENTER COMPLETENESS & GENERAL ISSUES ENGINEERING ISSUES: Roosevelt Center (RP 06-03 Third Review) The general issues as presented below provide information relevant to the subject review. For some submittal and/or plan & report content requirements the general intent ofthe requirement may have been met, but clarification, supplemental information or excluded plan/report elements is necessary or required. The necessary/required supplemental information or plan/report elements are conveyed under the general requirement as a "Note:" if applicable. All issues will require a formal response adjacent to redline comments, and in a separate letter for the issues below that includes appropriate reference to the corresponding issue. ISSUES-GENERAL: 1. Please provide a response to all issues that were idenified with preceding reviews but not incorporated into the plans according to the 3 scenarios provided below and with the preceding review. 2. Please show all roof downspout locations consistent with the SWMP BMP map and specify those that are to include in-line filter inserts on sheet 2 of the site plan. 3. Please provide the property information for each lot that abutts the subject project. The required information must include the lot number, unit number and subdivision name (if applicable), and Map number as recorded with the County of San Diego Recorders Office. 4. Please provide the zone designation for the City of Carlsbad Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) zone that the subject project is located within under the General Notes heading on the Redevelopment Permit (RP) title sheet (Zone 1). 5. Please provide a copy of the vesting deed for lot 19 as shown on the Assessor's map provided with the title report. The deed that was submitted only describes lot 17. 6. Please provide the name of the drainage basin that the subject project is located within on the Redevelopment Permit (RP) site plan title sheet as Buena Vista. 7. Please provide existing/proposed lot numbers for each separate property associated with this Redevelopment Permit (RP). 8. It should be noted that if commercial condominiums are proposed as indicated on the title sheet scope of work or if the residential apartment units will ultimately be converted to condominiums, an application for a Minor Subdivision is required and must be processed and approved prior to any constmctions permits being issued. As part of the review for the MS separate water laterals and meters and separate sewer laterals and clean outs will be required for each separate ownership. Note: Please provide a notew on the title sheet that staes: "Ifthe future subdivision of land to create the potential for separate ownership occur, separate water laterals and meters and separate sewer laterals and clean outs may be required to serve each separate ownership. " RP 06-03 Issues (First Review) Page 1 of 2 RP 06-03-Rooseveh Center (First Review) 12/12/2006 9. Please see the redline drawings, reports, certifications, estimates, etc.. .for issues that may have been excluded above. 10. Please include with the next submittal a formal written response to each issue identified above under a separate cover/letter, and/or adjacent to hand writen comments on the plans, reports and estimates/certifications, if not identified above according to one of the following three scenarios: 1) . You agree with the issue and have provided a formal response to how it has been addressed and have provided appropriate documentation to substantiate the resolution of the issue, with proper reference to location in the documentation. 2) . You agree with the issue as identified but are unable to comply and have formally provided a rational justification and a time frame under which the issue can/will be resolved. 3) . You disagree with the issue as stated, or feel that your design has been misinterpreted. All scenario 3 issues must be resolved prior to the next submittal of the subject review documents. This is necessary to adequately address each engineering issue and to minimize impacts to schedule due to unecessary review cycles. If the next submittal does not comply with the above, the submittal will be rejected and a meeting will be scheduled with the project proponent in an effort to conclusively resolve any remaining issues. Please feel free to contact me at 760-602-2747 should you have any questions regarding the engineering issues of concem. Respectfully, Christ Scobba, PE Associate Engineer Development Services Attachments: RP 06-03 Redline Check Print RP 06-03 SWMP Report Redline RP 06-03 Hydrology/Hydraulics Report Redline cc: File (w/o attachments) Deputy City Engineer, David Hauser (w/o attachments) Cliff Jones, Assistant Planner, City of Carlsbad Housing & Redevelopment Department (w/o attachments) Other C&I.doc Page 2 of 2 1^ (?itv of Catisbad Housing & Redevelopment Department November 16, 2006 RICHARD & RICHARD CONSTRUCTION 234 VENTURE STREET SUITE 100 SAN MARCOS, CA 92078 Subject: Roosevelt Center, Major Redevelopment Permit RP 06-03 Dear Richard: The items requested from you earlier to make your administrative redevelopment permit application no. RP 06-03 complete have been received and reviewed by the Housing & Redevelopment Department and all other appropriate departments. It has been determined that the application is now complete for final processing. Although the initial processing of your application may have already begun, the technical acceptance date is acknowledged by the date of this communication. The City may, in the course of processing the application, request that you clarify, amplify, correct, or othenvise, supplement the basic information required for the application. In an effort to continue to process the application in the most expeditious manner as possible, a list of issues identified by staff during the project review period has been included with this correspondence. These issues must be resolved prior to staff making a final determination on the project. Please contact my office at (760) 434-2813, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, Cliff Jones Assistant Planner c: Chris Scobba, Engineering Department File 2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037 @ Roosevelt Center 11/16/2006 Page 2 of3 No. RP 06-03 ISSUES OF CONCERN Staff has completed a review of the subject project for issues of concern. The following items need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a final determination on the proposed project: (Please note, the issues are listed under the department which identified them as an area of concern.) Housing & Redevelopment: 1. Staff feels as though the north elevation could still benefit from additional articulation. Staff suggest additional articulation be provided at the visible height of this elevation above the existing property line wall (second/third story level). The Design Review Board has expressed much concern about projects that have unarticulated walls. 2. Please identify line of existing property line wall on Sheet A-3.0. 3. Staff has concern that the palm trees in the outdoor dining area may look out of place with the existing landscape in the surrounding area. Please consider the impacts of providing such a tree and consider whether or not a different type of tree that fits in better with the surrounding landscape may be more appropriate. If necessary, please contact staff for suggestions on alternative plant material. 4. Please clarify in writing whether or not the proposed roof, visible from the east elevation, overhangs the property line to the east. FUTURE ITEMS REQUIRED PRIOR TO HEARING DA TE As soon as all issues are resolved to the satisfaction of all departments the project will be scheduled for a Design Review Board hearing. To help expedite the processing of the permit application the following information is being provided. The following items will be required for the hearing: A. Public Notification Packaqe: (Needed 3 weeks prior to hearing date.) The public notification package shall include the following information: a. A typewritten list of the names and addresses of all property owners within a 600' radius of subject property (including the applicant and/or owner). The list shall include the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest assessment rolls. b. 600' Radius Map: A map to scale not less than 1" = 200' showing each lot within 600' of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each of these lots shall be consecutively numbered and correspond with the property owners list. c. Since the property is also located within the coastal zone the following additional notification materials are required: a radius map showing all parcels within a 100-foot radius of the subject property; a list of addresses Roosevelt Center 11/16/2006 Page 3 of 3 for all occupants within the 100-foot radius; and two-sets if mailing labels addressed to "Occupant" for each address within the 100-foot radius. d. Two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners within a 600' radius of the subject property. The list must be typed in all CAPITAL LETTERS, left justified, void of punctuation. For any address other than single-family residence, an apartment, suite or building number must be included on a separate line. DO NOT include it in the street address line. DO NOT TYPE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ON LABELS. DO NOT provide addressed envelopes - PROVIDE LABELS ONLY. UNACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE Mrs. Jane Smith Mrs. Jane Smith MRS JANE SMITH 123 Magnolia Ave., Apt #3 123 Magnolia Ave. APT 3 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Apt. #3 123 MAGNOLIA AVE Carlsbad, CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 B. One (1) copy of a full-sized (24" x 36") colored site plan. (Needed 2 weeks prior to hearing date.) C. One (1) copy of full-sized (24" x 36") colored building elevations accurately depicting the proposed mature landscaping and how it relates to the building. (Needed 2 weeks prior to hearing date.) D. Ten (10) sets of full size plans folded to 8V2" xll". (Needed 2 weeks prior to hearing date.) E. One (1) set of 872" xll" black and white reduced plans. (Needed 2 weeks prior to hearing date.) F. Electronic files (in jpeg format) of the colored site plan and all building elevations presented on disk or sent via e-mail to cionesO^ci.carlsbad.ca.us (Needed 2 weeks priorto hearing date.) G. Please submit an 8V2" x 11 construction material board and color samples showing roofing, exterior walls, trim, etc. For questions regarding Housing & Redevelopment Department comments, please contact Cliff Jones at 760-434-2813. Engineering: Engineering Department comments are forthcoming and will be sent under a separate cover. City of Carlsbad DEVELOPMENT SERVICES-ENGINEERING Date: 08/10/2006 To: Richard & Richard Constmction (Agent) 234 Ventura Street, Suite 100 San Marcos, CA 92078 From: Chris Scobba, Associate Engineer Subject: Redevelopment Permit (RP), RP 06-03. (See also: CDP 06-09) Re: Second Review for Completeness and Initial Engineering Issues Applicant: 560 CVD, LLC (Owner) 1015 Chestnut Ave, #F2 Carisbad, CA 92008 Project Rooseveh Center (APN 203-292-15-17 &19-00) / Name/ 560-562 Carisbad Village Drive, Carisbad, CA 92008 Address: The application for "Roosevelt Center" has been deemed complete per CMC Section 21.54.010(d). However, significant engineering issues remain. Attached, please find a list of engineering issues. If you, the applicant, or the owner has any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (760) 602-2747. Respectfiilly, Chris Scobba, PE Associate Engineer Development Services Attachments: RP 06-03 Engineering Issues cc: File Deputy City Engineer, David Hauser Cliff Jones, Assistant Planner RP 06-03 Issues Cover (First Review) 08/10/2006 Page I of 1 ROOSEVELT CENTER ENGINEERING ISSUES ENGINEERING ISSUES: Roosevelt Center (RP 06-03 Second Review) The general issues as presented below provide information relevant to the subject review. For some submittal and/or plan & report content requirements the general intent ofthe requirement may have been met, but clarification, supplemental information or excluded plan/report elements is necessary or required. The necessary/required supplemental information or plan/report elements are conveyed under the general requirement as a "Note:" if applicable. All issues will require a formal response adjacent to redline comments, and in a separate letter for the issues below that includes appropriate reference to the corresponding issue. ISSUES-GENERAL: 1. Please provide the property information for each lot that abutts the subject project. The required information must include the lot number, unit number and subdivision name (if applicable), and Map number as recorded with the County of San Diego Recorders Office. 2. Please provide the zone designation for the City ofCarlsbad Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) zone that the subject project is located within under the General Notes heading on the Redevelopment Permit (RP) title sheet (Zone 1). 3. Please provide a copy ofthe vesting deed for lot 19 as shown on the Assessor's map provided with the title report. The deed that was submitted only describes lot 17. 4. Please provide the name ofthe drainage basin that the subject project is located within on the Redevelopment Permit (RP) site plan title sheet as Buena Vista. 5. Please provide existing/proposed lot numbers for each separate property associated with this Redevelopment Permit (RP). Note: A lot consolidation will be a condition of approval for this project. Please show and dimension all existing lot lines and add a note "lots to be consolidation". 6. It should be noted that if commercial condominiums are proposed as indicated on the title sheet scope of work or if the residential apartment units will ultimately be converted to condominiums, an application for a Minor Subdivision is required and must be processed and approved prior to any constmctions permits being issued. As part ofthe review for the MS separate water laterals and meters and separate sewer laterals and clean outs will be required for each separate ownership. ISSUES-GRADING: 7. Please submit for review a revised preliminary geotechnical/soils report prepared by a geotechnical engineer or geologist registered in the state of Califomia. Note: Please provide a revise report or an addendum that specifically addresses the constmction of the proposed building foundation adjacent to and below the existing stmcture on the north side ofthe northerly property line and cites specific RP 06-03 Issues (First Review) Page 1 of 6 RP 06-03-RooseveIt Center (First Review) 08/10/2006 recommendations/certifications that ensures the stability of that stmcture. See recline comments on reprot provided with the second submittal. 8. Please provide a preliminary hydrologic and hydraulic drainage analysis under a separate cover that analyzes gthe drainage tributary to and or impacted by the subject project, prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of Califomia. This analysis must include the following report components: Cover Sheet- Stamped and signed by the civil engineer and qualifying the report as "preliminary". Include all City reference numbers associated with the report on the title sheet. Introduction-Heading with narrative that discusses existing and proposed topography, project specific hydrology and hydraulic constraints and the proposed approach to resolution. Storm Water Quality-Discussion of downstream impacts caused by the proposed development that will play a roll in the approach to drainage design. Existing Conditions- Preliminary nodal analysis for existing conditions that are compatible for meaningfiil comparisons with proposed impacts to drainage. Proposed Condition- Preliminary nodal analysis and associated proposed basin drainage map with all nodes identified and associated basin nomenclature and drainage areas identified consistent with the hydrologic and or hydraulic analysis. Conclusion-Discusses the content of the report and connects the issues identified in the Introduction to the analysis output and draws quantitative comparisons between existing and proposed drainage pattems and points of concentration both within and downstream from the subject project and certifies that down stream impacts have been mitigated to MEP. Drainage Map- With a legend, north arrow and scale, and all nodes identified and associated basin nomenclature and existing and proposed drainage areas and improvements identified consistent with the hydrologic/hydraulic analysis. Appendix- Including all exhibits, references, excerpts and supporting information clearly organized and cross-referenced with associated report components. Note: Provide under separate cover with all elements discussed above. ISSUES-EXISTING CONDITIONS: 9. Please provide a revised geotechnical report or an addendum that specifically addresses the constmction of the proposed building foundation adjacent to and below the existing stmcture on the north side ofthe northerly property line and cites specific recommendations/certifications that ensures the stability of that stmcture during and after constmction. Other C&I.doc Page 2 of 6 RP 06-03-RooseveIt Center (First Review) 08/10/2006 ISSUES-STORM WATER OUALITY 10. Source Control BMP(s) Required Please include within the SWMP report and applicable drawing sheets all source control BMP(s) necessary to prevent urban mnoff pollution. "Source Control BMP (both structural and non-structural)" means land use or site planning practices, or structures that aim to prevent urban runoffpollution by reducing the potential for contamination at the source of pollution. Source control BMP(s) minimize the contact between pollutants and urban runoff. Examples include roof structures over trash or material storage areas, and berms aroundfuel dispensing areas. Potential source control BMP(s) that have not been identified but may be applicable to the subject project are as follows: • Integrated Pest Management: An ecosystem-based strategy that focuses on long term prevention of pests or their damage through a combination of techniques such as biological control, habitat manipulation, modification of cultural practices, and use of resistant varieties or choosing plants that minimize or eliminate the use of fertilizer or pesticides to sustain growth. Pesticides are used only after monitoring indicates they are needed according to established guidelines, and treatments are made with the goal of removing only the target organism. • Storm Water Oualitv Public/Employee Education: Brochures or training that focuses on dispensing general information or specific instmction on the non-point sources of pollutants as related to stormwater quality and measures that the public or company employees can take to minimize the contributions we all make on a daily basis due to a lack of understanding. 11. Please provide a basin map for the 2 & 10 year analysis provided on page 3 of the report. Include associated basing delineation and nodal points of concentration. Make quantitative comparisons between required treatment flow rates based upon flow based calculations, and treatment capacities for the propsoed treatment control BMP's. 12. Please provided specifics for washing offloor mats and kitchen equipmet. If washing prohibited from being performed outside what provisions have been made to accommodate the practice. 13. Please show all roof downspout locations and include reference to in-line filter inswert locations. Direct connections are not permitted. 14. Treatment Control BMP(s) Required Where identified in Table 1, and after site design and source control BMPs have been incorporated into the project, applicants of priority projects shall design a single or combination of treatment Other C&I.doc Page 3 of 6 RP 06-03-RooseveIt Center (First Review) 08/10/2006 control BMPs designed to inflltrate, filter, and/or treat mnoff from the project footprint to one of the "Numeric Sizing Treatment Standards" listed in Table 3. Note: Please provide a site map per requirements of Appendix D of Carlsbad SUSMP (Attached to report redline). Include specific information regarding the types of treatment control BMP's that were considered for the project and provide clear rationalization for the method chosen and the methods excluded and the reasoning behind the recommendations made. Please include within the SWMP report and applicable drawing sheets all treatment control BMP(s) necessary to prevent urban mnoff pollution. 'Treatment Control (Structural) BMP" means any engineered system designed and constructed to remove pollutants from urban runoff Pollutant removal is achieved by simple gravity settling of particulate pollutants, flltration, biological uptake, media adsorption or any other physical, biological, or chemical process. Potential treatment control BMP(s) that have been identified as applicable to the subject project have been included below. These are only suggested treatment control BMP(s) and are not speciflcally required or endorsed by the City of Carlsbad. The civil engineer that is charged with evaluating the existing condition and downstream impacts relative to the proposed development, and the identification of impacts to storm water quality and mitigating measures, has the ultimate responsibility of making final determinations and recommendations and providing supporting documentation/ narrative within the required SWMP. Potential Treatment Control BMP(s) are as follows: • Biofiiters-Vegetated swales are open, shallow channels with vegetation covering the side slopes and bottom that collect and slowly convey mnoff flow to downstream discharge points. They are designed to treat mnoff through filtering by the vegetation in the channel, filtering through a subsoil matrix, and/or infiltration into the underlying soils. Swales can be natural or manmade. They trap particulate pollutants (suspended solids and trace metals), promote infiltration, and reduce the flow velocity of stormwater mnoff Vegetated swales can serve as part of a stormwater drainage system and can replace curbs, gutters and storm sewer systems. • Filter Inserts-Drain inserts are manufactured filters or fabric placed in a drop inlet to remove sediment and debris. There are a multitude of inserts of various shapes and configurations, typically falling into one of three different groups: socks, boxes, and trays. The sock consists of a fabric, usually constmcted of polypropylene. The fabric may be attached to a frame or the grate of the inlet holds the sock. Socks are meant for vertical (drop) inlets. Boxes are constmcted of plastic or wire mesh. Typically a polypropylene "bag" is placed in the wire mesh box. The bag takes the form of the box. Most box products are one box; that is, the setting area and filtration through media occur in the same box. Some products consist of one or more trays or mesh grates. The trays may hold different types of media. Filtration media vary by manufacturer. Types include polypropylene, porous polymer, treated cellulose, and activated carbon. The above referenced information was obtained from the CASQA-Califomia Stormwater BMP Other C&I.doc Page 4 of 6 RP 06-03-RooseveIt Center (First Review) 08/10/2006 Handbook. Please refer to that document for additional specifics related to project specific permanent BMP(s). Important: Please include within the SWMP a comprehensive discussion of all treatment control BMP(s) that were considered as appHcable for the subject project and the justification(s) for both the excluded and the recommended method/product. 15. Operation and Maintenance(0&M) Plan Required Please refer to Standard Urban Runoff Management Plan-Storm Water Standards. Section V, "Implementation & Maintenance of Requirements", which describes how implementation and maintenance of constmction and permanent BMP(s) must be assured for both constmction permits and discretionary actions. For permanent BMP(s), this section provides a process and the requirements for executing a maintenance agreement with the City. Additionally, Section VI contains appendices to the Storm Water Standards manual that are either necessary or designed to provide guidance in completing the storm water requirements in this manual. A comprehensive and coherent Operation and Maintenance plan is required for all priority projects within the City of Carlsbad and must include specifics for all applicable source control and site design BMP(s) in addition to all treatment control BMP(s). Additionally, include within the SWMP a discussion regarding the requirement that applicants proposing projects that include permanent BMP(s) shall enter into a maintenance agreement, satisfactory to the City, following the program outlined in the "Permanent Storm Water BMP Maintenance Agreement Requirements" prior to the issuance of any permits or approvals. The permanent BMP(s) shall be graphically shown on the plans, where possible, and will be made a condition of the project's permit/approval. The permanent BMP(s) operation and maintenance requirements (O&M plan) shall also be noted on the plans and made a condition of the project's permit/approval. Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Plan: The applicant shall include an Operation & Maintenance (O&M) plan, prepared satisfactory to the City, with the approved maintenance agreement, which describes the designated responsible party to manage the storm water BMP(s), employee's training program and duties, operating schedule, maintenance frequency, routine service schedule, specific maintenance activities (including maintenance of source control BMP(s) like storm water conveyance system stamps, pervious surfaces, integrated pest management, efficient irrigation systems, etc...), copies of resource agency permits, and any other necessary activities. At a minimum, maintenance agreements shall require the applicant to provide inspection and servicing of all permanent BMP(s) on an annual basis. The project proponent or City-approved maintenance entity shall complete and maintain O&M forms to document all maintenance requirements. Parties responsible for the O&M plan shall retain records for at least 5 years. These documents shall be made available to the City for inspection upon request at any time. Note: Please provide a comprehensive discussion of operation and maintenance requirements and responsibilities. Include all applicable elements of site design, source control and treatment control that will ensure perpetual efficacy toward mitigating measures for storm water quality associated with the subject project and as recommended in the SWMP. Other C&I.doc Page 5 of 6 RP 06-03-Rooseveh Center (First Review) 08/10/2006 REDLINE PLANS, REPORTS & ESTIMATES/CERTIFICATIONS ISSUES 1. Please see the redline drawings, reports, certifications, estimates, etc.. .for issues that may have been excluded above. 2. Please include with the next submittal a formal written response to each issue identified above under a separate cover/letter, and/or adjacent to hand writen comments on the plans, reports and estimates/certifications, if not identified above according to one of the following three scenarios: 1) . You agree with the issue and have provided a formal response to how it has been addressed and have provided appropriate documentation to substantiate the resolution of the issue, with proper reference to location in the documentation. 2) . You agree with the issue as identified but are unable to comply and have formally provided a rational justification and a time frame under which the issue can/will be resolved. 3) . You disagree with the issue as stated, or feel that your design has been misinterpreted. All scenario 3 issues must be resolved prior to the next submittal of the subject review documents. This is necessary to adequately address each engineering issue and to minimize impacts to schedule due to unecessary review cycles. Please feel free to contact me at 760-602-2747 should you have any questions regarding the engineering issues of concem. Respectfiilly, Christ Scobba, PE Associate Engineer Development Services Attachments RP 06-03 Redline Check Print Lot Line Adjustment Application cc: File (w/o attachments) Deputy City Engineer, David Hauser (w/o attachments) Cliff Jones, Assistant Planner Other C&I.doc Page 6 of 6 July 6, 2006 City of Carlsbad Housing & Redevelopment Department RICHARD & RICHARD CONSTRUCTION ^ ^"^^ 234 VENTURE STREET SUITE 100 CITY OP CARISBAD SAN MARCOS, CA 92078 ^^"^"^DEI'MI^^^^ Subject: Roosevelt Center, Major Redevelopment Permit RP 06-03 RBCEIVED JUL 1 A 2006 BY: • Dear Richard: The above-mentioned application was determined incomplete on July 6, 2006. The attached list includes information that must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to the Housing & Redevelopment Office. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this list must be included with your submittal. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted to the Redevelopment Office, the City has an additional thirty (30) days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, March 1, 2006, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal ofthe application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact my office at (760) 434-2813, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, Cliff Jones Assistant Planner Chris Scobba, Engineering Department Pat Kelley, Building Department Greg Ryan, Fire Department Pamela Elliott, Landscape Consultant Enclosures 2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 • (760) 434-2810/2811 • FAX (760) 720-2037 @ Roosevelt Center 07/06/2006 Page 2 of4 No. RP 06-03 LIST OF ITEIVIS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Staff has completed a review of the subject project for application completeness. The applications and plans submitted for this project are incomplete at this time. Please resubmit 4 sets of plans addressing the following incomplete items: Housing & Redevelopment: 1. The proposed project will require a noise study due to its proximity to Carisbad Village Drive and the nearby railroad. Please prepare. Engineering: Engineering Department comments are forthcoming and will be sent under a separate cover. Roosevelt Center 07/06/2006 Page 3 of 4 No. RP 06-03 ISSUES OF CONCERN Staff has completed a review of the subject project for issues of concern. The following items need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a final determination on the proposed project: (Please note, the issues are listed under the department which identified them as an area of concern.) Housing & Redevelopment: 1. As mentioned previously, staff suggests the outdoor eating area of the restaurant be raised to the existing grade. This will help to create a more active street frontage along Roosevelt Street, which is a primary goal of the Village Master Plan. The proposed lowering of the grade in conjunction with the proposed fencing effectively eliminates the interaction between the outdoor dining area and the street. Please provide written justification as to wh^Mthe grade is being lower"bd and cannot remain a existing grade. -pae^/ns^D ^v^=^to i^^3N:i^buri^i<no 2. Please reduce wall heights along Roosevelt Street to 42 inches or less. 3. Staff suggests gates be installed at the first flight of stairs or after the first flight of stairs in order to prevent persons from entering the second story of the building after hours. (w^TAtX^ Conceptual grading plan building footprint differs from site plan building footprint. Please fix inconsistencies. Cz3«uU2:X^ The north elevation is very unarticulated. Staff suggest additional articulation be v ^ provided at the visible height of this elevation (second/third story level), sssi, Acick^ck /^^CKJX(ZZ\^^ -Va 0(ffc^ "-^-Wnn ~ A~=i-G> Building: 1. The visitor handicap parking space must be van accessible with a van accessible loading zone. Applicant has not addressed this mandatory requirement. There is no room provided for this State mandated feature. The garages are not interconnected to the dwelling units and are considered as covered parking usable by anyone. Noting them as "owner-occupied" if they are not interconnected to the dwelling units does not abrogate the requirements that all on-site parking be accessible tojhe ^ ^ _ disabled. As Oi^Cuaseo p^t^ TVct* Ou^jit^ , v/iSiToc. <^T/\U- r^^ Aicx£^>^n£'j 2. SDGE does not allow gas meter alcoves within structures (or underneath "^'^^'^ S%v;c/5- u>« ^j^d overhangs). The applicant should meet w/ SDGE to determine appropriate meter 1 vUil, ^' uhLfli, locations. ui&/uc {rut OJITIA uJKtcU i/u*^ - Roosevelt Center 07/06/2006 Page 4 of 4 3. Grease interceptor located under trash bins is not acceptable. To service the interceptor, the bins would have to be rolled out into the alley obstructing traffic for an unreasonably long period of time. TtVc i*jTeace<3h».- W% Uc^Wtl »#v 4iu. To discuss all Building Department related concerns, please contact Principal Building Inspector. Pat Kelley, at (760) 602-2716. Fire: 1. Fire Department would ask if the roof top is accessible to the occupants then provide two exits separated by !^ the diagonal of the roof area. Cc.eftiu*p««rc> To discuss all Fire Department related concerns, please contact Deputy Fire Marshal Gregory Ryan at (760) 602-4663. Engineering: Engineering Department comments are forthcoming and will be sent under a separate cover. ^isr-'»^Tc^ %^J^^^^tr^'^ (L-om/^Mstvjr^, Landscape Plan review: The following corrections need to be made to the plans so that they will meet the requirements ofthe City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. 1. Provide the following on the landscape concept: • Existing street trees/palms on Carisbad Village Drive & Roosevelt Street, ^^^cjuit^ ? ^P^\J^ • Show and label the sidewalk, street curbs/edge of pavement and provide street names. ^Si^Mifit-s^ u^<j?auJeo • Show and label property lines. ^v%Wk) • Show and label any easements «sii^^3ri < L*Vy?7<£iui:^ 2. The building footprint is shown differently on the survey plan than what is shown on the Site Plan (A2.0) and the Landscape Concept Plan (L-1) and needs to be reconciled. R^:oaT^\U^v3 3. Planting areas surrounding the entrance off of Carisbad Village Drive are different on the Site Plan (A2.0) and the Landscape Concept Plan (L-1) and needs to be reconciled. |leCo^x.AUc^ 4. Provide 2 copies of the landscape concept plan on the next submittal. \)\r«^-^'^ For questions regarding Landscape Plan comments, please contact Pamela Elliott at 760-944-1620. June 24, 2006 TO: Cliff Jones, Assistant Planner Michele Masterson, Management Analyst FROM: Pamela Elliott, Landscape Architect RE: Landscape Architectural Review - Conceptual Review - 1^^ Review Roosevelt Center 560-562 Carlsbad Village Drive & Roosevelt Street RP 06-03 Landscape Architect: Steve Ahles Phone: 858-756-8963 Please advise the applicant to make the following corrections to the plans so that they will meet the requirements of the City of Carlsbad's Landscape Manual. 1. Provide the following on the landscape concept: • Existing street trees/palms on Carlsbad Village Drive & Roosevelt Street. • Show and label the sidewalk, street curbs/edge of pavement and provide street names. • Show and label property lines. • Show and label any easements 2. The building footprint is shown differently on the survey plan than what is shown on the Site Plan (A2.0) and the Landscape Concept Plan (L-1) and needs to be reconciled. 3. Planting areas surrounding the entrance off of Carlsbad Village Drive are different on the Site Plan (A2.0) and the Landscape Concept Plan (L-1) and needs to be reconciled. 4. Provide 2 copies of the landscape concept plan on the next submittal. City of Carlsbad Housing & Redevelopment Department March 30, 2006 RICHARD & RICHARD CONSTRUCTION 234 VENTURE STREET SUITE 100 SAN MARCOS, CA 92078 Subject: Roosevelt Center, Major Redevelopment Permit RP 06-03 APP 2!JiJ6 BY: RECEIVED f Dear Richard: ^^ ^^ 2006 ^ CITYOFCARLSBAD Thank you for applying for a Land Use Permit in the City of CarisbadiOUBHilS WOeifillW Redevelopment Department, together with other appropriate City depSHmSnTsJ has reviewed your Redevelopment Permit, application No. RP 06-03, as to its completeness for processing. The application is incomplete, as submitted. The attached list includes information that must be submitted to complete your application. This list of items must be submitted directly to the Housing & Redevelopment Office. All list items must be submitted simultaneously and a copy of this iist must be included with your submittal. No processing of your application can occur until the application is determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted to the Redevelopment Office, the City has an additional thirty (30) days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, March 1, 2006, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal ofthe application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. Please contact my office at (760) 434-2813, if you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting to discuss the application. Sincerely, Z. Cliff Jones Assistant Planner c: Chris Scobba, Engineering Pat Kelley, Building Greg Ryan, Fire Enclosures 2965 Roosevelt St., Ste. B • Carlsbad, CA 92008-2389 •(^60) 434-2810/12811 • FAX (760) 720-2037 @ Roosevelt Center 03/30/2006 Page 2 of 8 No. RP 06-03 LIST OF ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE APPLICATION Staff has completed a review of the subject project for application completeness. The applications and plans submitted for this project are incomplete at this time. Please resubmit 4 sets of plans addressing the following incomplete items: Housing & Redevelopment: 1. The proposed project will require a noise study due to its proximity to Carisbad Village Drive and the nearby railroad. This study should be prepared once the desian ofthe Proj^r-t arrpptahlP tn c;taff 2. Please complete the Early Public Notification Package. Cor^'RJelro ^ TGtAH A*->O 3. Please provide a color board (no larger then 9" x 12"), showing building materials and color samples of glass, reveals, aggregate, wood, etc. ^^ee >v5TT/v<:M-etP 4. The proposed plans are not drawn to the 1/8" scale as noted. Please revise the plans accordingly. This will effect the parking requirement as much of the building square footage was not correctly calculated. p\x^x> 5. Please include the following items on the cover sheet: (These items are requested as part of the application complete checklist) W Please correct Zoning to read "V-R Village Redevelopment, District 1" and include the general plan information "V, Village" on the cover page. CMr^^beo- ^idee^^S" ^ At upper right hand corner include the following permit number "RP 06-03". hOo-'i^'^c^-Z^ Please identify the cubic footage of tenant storage space per each unit under "Area Calculations." A^c:^^' /x^-z.ta Zi Please include the project density on the cover sheet. A-rOcEso ' Please include setback range on the cover page for District 1 as well as the proposed setbacks. /<wc>ofocp -t^^ '-^ ^-r^^'^ Please provide and break down the Average Daily Trips by separate use. MDceO -, <-^^ k 2. o Please identify site acreage, /^ocxso yz^^Z^-^ Please identify existing land use. ^^sB '"^-s " T«^3>^T OVTA- Please provide total building coverage, -^s^ ^-s'' 1><-IO^^T PVT^V Please provide the amount of qualified open space. ^< > • 6. Please include the following items on the plans: (These items are requested as part of the application complete checklist) • Please show the location of all major buildings, showing size and type both within the project and for a distance of 50 feet on the cover sheet, • Please identify the distance between adjacent buildings and/or structures. A2.o • Please indicate top and bottom elevations for all fences, walls, and retaining walls. Provide section detail of these walls as it relates to adjacent properties • Indicate fences, walls, and planters on elevation sheets. Af?.c 7. Please show setback lines on elevation sheets and floor plans, ^i^ee: A"2^o, i.i, 2.2 ,^.0 A Roosevelt Center 03/30/2006 ^ Page 3 of 8 8. Please clearly indicate existing and finished grade on all elevation and section detail sheets, -s^^ o 9. Please correct spelling of In-Lieu on sheet A2.0. (ljDri4a*5e:iiirio 10. Please provide two copies of the Preliminary Title report current within the last six (6) months. /'«rrTA^:t\eO 11. Please complete a signed "Notice of Time Limits on Discretionary Applications" Co^u^c:o fey" Engineering: Incomplete Issues-General: 1. The proposed residential units for sale will require a parcel map for minor subdivision. Please see the City of Carisbad Municipal Code for specific ^ requirements regarding condominium subdivisions, c^-' 2. Please update expiration date for Landscape architect to 9-30-07 on each sheet. C&aii.^eT::Xt^ .^yQ 3. Please revise the sheet format to be specific to discretionary plans rather than the ^•^^^ permit plan format. O p 4. Please affix an RCE seal to the civil sheet with current registration information. i^J Please delineate and label the existing building at the southwest corner of the site ^ and specify demolition/treatment. Incomplete Issues-Site Plan: 6. Please delineate and provide typical dimensions for all proposed parking stalls and drive isles. 7. Please relocate all gate swings to be entirely within the property or reverse the swing direction toward the property rather than the ROW. Incomplete Issues-Grading: 8. According to Table 1. Standard Development Project & Priority Project Storm Water BMP Requirements Matrix. According to the City of Carisbad Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan -Storm Water Standards (Available for download at http://www.ci.carisbad.ca.us/stormwater/susmppdf/susmp.pdf) this project is classified as a priority project and accordingly must meet all requirements to mitigate impacts to storm water quality via site design, source control and treatment control BMP's. 9. Please submit for review a Storm Water Management Plan report with your next submittal that discusses project specifics as they relate to ali three of these BMP's and how they will reduce, eliminate and treat the pollutants applicable to the restaurant category: Trash & Debris, Oxygen Demanding Substances, Oil & Grease, Bacteria & Viruses and any other applicable pollutants to Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). Please include all analysis/calculations to substantiate treatment control requirements have been met for either flow based or volume base treatment. Roosevelt Center 03/30/2006 ^ Page 4 of8 Appendix D in the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan -Storm Water Standards manual is to be used as a resource for report development and content. 10. Please complete and submit a Storm Water Quality Project Priority Determination Checklist (attached to civil sheet) completed by a qualified individual. 11. Please provide total wall heights for all existing walls within and adjacent to the subject project, as applicable. 12. Please identify all existing drainage features and improvements within, tributary to, and directly downstream from the subject project. Include all known dimensions, diameters and longitudinal slopes, as applicable for proper evaluation relative to impacts caused by the subject development. 13. Please provide the total disturbed area for the subject project. 14. Please provide total estimated earthwork quantities to accomplish the proposed grading or construction of the subject project. To discuss all Engineering Department related concerns, please contact Chris Scobba at (760) 602-2747. Rooseveh Center 03/30/2006 Page 5 of 8 ISSUES OF CONCERN No. RP 06-03 Staff has completed a review of the subject project for issues of concern. The following items need to be resolved or adequately addressed prior to staff making a final determination on the proposed project: (Please note, the issues are listed under the department which identified them as an area of concern.) Housing & Redevelopment: 1. As mentioned in the preliminary review, staff is concerned with the stainA/ay from the third floor balcony. Please meet with staff to discuss the design. ^^J^ '^Af=^=' jjL. 2. Staff suggests the outdoor eating and restaurant area be raised to the existing grade. This will help to create a more active street frontage along Roosevelt Street, which is a primary goal of the Village Master Plan. Staff strongly encourages the restaurant to remain at existing grade. ^ 3. Staff suggests the applicant bring the retail floor of the building fon/vard to the *^ property line and have the entrances to the retail space oriented towards Carisbad Village Drive rather than inwards within the courtyard area. The design can appear similar to the front elevation of the restaurant (staff is willing to support non-divided windows along the first floor elevation fronting Carisbad Village Drive). Staff also suggests the applicant consider opening the courtyard area more and providing a small fountain or art piece in the middle of the courtyard. If the applicant wishes to provide an art piece please contact the Carisbad Village Business Association for information regarding local artists in the area. Additionally, the proposed gates should be moved to the entryway of the flrst flight of stairs or after the flrst flight of stairs. Second and third floor levels should maintain the proposed setbacks. Please meet with staff if additional clarification is necessary. (i^i^sx^ 4. Staff is unable top provide detailed comments on the proposed architectural design at this time. Please provide a color board and sample materials so staff can further _ evaluate the architectural design, S^ET vMTAcj^^\st:> <:'.cj^or»- Q.^^s^€^s^f<io^ l^p T 5. Staff suggests the applicant provide some sort of photo simulation of the project so 6 staff can evaluate the design of the project and its impacts on the property on the .r»m.Ap northwest corner and the property to the north. *S3cf:e^ -i-^a^^ ^v2-«3>4>Gt3i2J*^ The proposed project Is eligible to participate in the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program for a maximum of 100% ofthe required on-site retail, office, and restaurant parking subject to the approval of the Housing & Redevelopment Commission. As staff mentioned previously, staff can support 100% participation in the Parking In-Lieu fee Program however, there is no guarantee that participafion in the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program will ulfimately be approved, ^f^oj^^ As mentioned in the preliminary review, apartments are not evaluated for conformance with the Planned Development (PD) standards. If the owner wishes to Roosevelt Center 03/30/2006 Page 6 of 8 convert the units to condominiums in the future, the project must be built to the PD standards (Carisbad Municipal Code 21.45.080) or else the project will not be able to be converted to condominiums at a later date. In particular, the PD ordinance will require tenant storage space and private recreational space. <f3Ui 8. Staff has a concern about having only one trash receptacle for all the proposed uses. Please indicate the reason for providing only on receptacle. p^Gcm^ >^^^«<30IT^^3*JAO "n2W£,tV CA<^. M&*i t^&^o^ woe iioceeme P^CkiOP \pPH^ 9. Please identify the height of the parapet walls that screen the mechanical equipment. 10. Please identify roof pitch on the roof plan. 11. Staff recommends enhanced paving be provided in the outdoor dining area. F\Oceo vr/v fOoW oKi A2.0 Staff suggests the recreational deck area and balconies include landscaped plots or planter areas. A<oc>©D -'^SJSE" A^-^.Z. ^ L-l 13. Please consider the location of the signage for the retail space fronting Carisbad Village drive. This area should be cleariy defined on the elevations. Please note that signage for the project will be approved as a separate permit, -s^^ A 3.0 14. Please identify how the kitchen area is vented. pi_ocfu- ^c^s, SefApf COCDA^CTO 15. Please identify the cubic footage of the storage in the mansard roof area. Please indicate mathemafical dimensions. '3^^ 16. An area has not been indicated for the automatic fire sprinkler double check valve. This assembly must be on private property and typically takes up space in landscaped areas. The enfire first level is currently a structure. Please explain? 17. Please describe the current parking agreement with the property owner at the northwest corner (if one exits) and explain how that property will be impacted as a result of the proposed project. tOe^^j T^ve^ t\:A^^e- fOo /i^^ou^^ C^:>QJCU3JTV{ , Ovjo— Buildinsr^ 'H'^^ A«^e^'i> ^xu^HT -^U-W^ po/v>^F U^ftfu "meift--pfi^^ 1. The plans have quite a few dimensional inconsistencies. Scaled dimensions are different from stated dimensions. Please fix the plans accordingly, fn-x^eo 2. The visitor handicap parking space must be van accessible (8 foot loading zone). A strict reading on the State Code would require a garage space to be van accessible as well since it cannot be determined whether the garages are solely for the use of the dwelling units. They don't directly connect to the units, so a plan checker mai( ask for these garages to be accessible as well, ewoa^ OC^uf^eo^ f> axsi ArT€ (cs^'^^y^^^^c!^. 3. SDGE does not allow gas meter alcoves within structures (or underneath overhangs). The applicant should meet w/ SDGE to determine appropriate meter locations. T<Vw^ u^iXHr-Ctei^ AioQ PoifOtr fbvvA>w«M._ Su(%^^LTT/:^_-^t rw Rooseveh Center 03/30/2006 Page 7 of 8 4. An area has not been indicated for the automatic fire sprinkler double check valve. This assembly must be on private property and typically takes up space in landscaped areas. The entire first level is currently a structure. Please explain? 5. There is no space provided for recycle bins. One bin is unlikely to be enough for this size facility although more frequent service will be an opfion. AOIE^BO A{>3n7«u/4^ 6. The restaurant will need a grease interceptor on site, outdoors, and on private property. Please identify the location. /^sOCBD V^*^v=ceo Xo^^ 'E^iCXsmiiXiJ^ To discuss all Building Department related concerns, please contact Principal Building Inspector, Pat Kelley, at (760) 602-2716. Fire: 1. The proposed location of the Fire Sprinkler system backflow assembly and riser locations need to be identifled. These items also affect placement of flre hydrants and other utilities, as easements have to be drawn and recorded. , _ 2. Fire Department standards will ask you to provide an area or room for the fire i^g>0c?srt5O sprinkler riser that is accessible from the exterior. ^oJSu-'j To discuss all Fire Department related concerns, please contact Deputy Fire Marshal Gregory Ryan at (760) 602-4663. Engineering: 1. Please see redline plans for additional comments. /^^^ 2. Please identify drainage outlets at face of curb, reference the standard drawing that \ ^ the drain will ultimately be constructed by. 3. Please submit a copy of the projects soils report for evaluation of geotechnical recommendations related to remedial earthwork. 4. Please provide existing/proposed topography based on a City benchmark and reference on the title sheet. 5. Please provide detailed cross sections at the most conservative points along the proposed wall at the property line and adjacent to the existing building at the northeast corner of the project, adjacent to the ROW of Roosevelt Street and along the property line that borders the southwest property line. These sections must fully illustrate the proposed walls and footings relative to the existing structure and property lines/ROW. To discuss all Engineering Department related concerns, please contact Chris Scobba at (760) 602-2747. Landscape Plan review: Comments on the preliminary landscape plan are forthcoming and will be sent under a separate cover. Roosevelt Center 03/30/2006 Page 8 of 8 Crime Prevention Plan Review: The City's Crime Prevention Specialist typically reviews plans for larger projects in an effort to increase security through project design. Project design recommendations have been enclosed for your review. For questions regarding the attached comments, please contact Jodee Sasway ofthe Carisbad Police Department at 760-931-2195. City of Carlsbad Police Department Date: March 8, 2006 To: Cliff Jones- Redevelopment From: J. Sasway, CPS - Pohce Department Subject: RP 06-03 Roosevelt Center Plan Review Recommendations The following recommendations are optimal security suggestions utilizing Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) and are provided by Carlsbad PoUce Department's Crime Prevention Unit. The purpose of this document is to safeguard property and public welfare by reviewing and regulating the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures. The Crime Prevention Unit presents recommendations in two sections, site considerations and building recommendations. Site Considerations Create Defensible Space Strategies to consider: Provide clearly defined transitions from public to private space. Use landscaping, fencing and ground cover to create territoriality and an identity for the property. Use natural barriers to designate space and separate activities that may conflict. Design space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Design the space to direct the flow of people in the manner intended, preventing people from entering unauthorized space. Consider that if people feel comfortable and safe in all areas, they are more likely to use the areas. Area of Concern The enclosed visitor parking that includes the pedestrian entrance/exit doors from garages into corridor toward retail and residential. The number one deterrent to crime is the ability to see and be seen, by day and by night. The lack of natural surveillance into this area will increase the risk of crime. Further, as it is enclosed and secluded it will additionaUy increase the risk of crime and increase the fear of crime, decreasing the quality of life. FinaUy, this is mixing activities that might conflict. This plan mixes the pedestrian traffic of the retaU and residential uses where the two should be separate and their identities defined. Residential Recommendations Lighting All vehicular drive surfaces, open parking areas and carports should be illuminated with a minimum maintained 1 foot-candle of light at ground level during the hours of darkness. 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7280 • (760) 931-2100 • FAX (760)931-8473 @ All exterior common area pedestrian walkways and recreation areas should be illuminated with a minimum maintained 0.25 foot-candle of light at ground level during the hours of darkness. Open stairways and enclosed common area corridors should be illuminated with a minimum maintained 0.5 foot-candle of light on all landings and stair treads during the hours of darkness. Enclosed stairways shall be illuminated at all times with a minimum maintained 1 foot-candle of light on all landings and stair treads. Cluster mailboxes and trash enclosures located on the exterior should be illuminated with a minimum maintained 1 fobt-candle of light, measured within a five-foot radius at ground level, during the hours of darkness. Recessed areas of building or fences, which have a minimum depth of two feet, a minimum height of five feet, and do not exceed 6 feet in width and are capable of humain concesdment, shadl be illuminated with a minimum maintained 0.25 foot-candles of light at ground level during the hours of darkness. This requirement applies to defined recessed areas that are within 6 feet of the edge of designated walking surface with an unobstructed pathway to it, not hindered by walls or hedgerow landscaping a minimum of two feet in height. Accessible luminaries utilized to meet the requirements of this section shall have vandal resistant light fixtures and be not less than three feet in height from the walking surface when used to illuminate walkways and a minimum of 78 inches in height above the driving surface when illuminating surfaces associated with vehicles. Light fixtures shall be deemed accessible if mounted within 15 feet vertically or 6 feet horizontally from any accessible surface or any adjoining roof, balcony, landing, stair tread, platform or similar structure. The Ught source utilized to comply with this section to meet parking and drive surface Ughting shaU have a rated average bulb life of not less than 10,000 hours. Landscaping For surveillance and security, Tree canopies should not be lower than 5 feet. Do not allow trees to provide access to roofs or balconies. Let landscaping augment, not deter from lighting. Plant low profile shrubs, below three feet Apply security plants where necessary to prevent loitering and tampering Install walls and fences that are see through for surveillance. Lock gates and install gates that allow surveillance. Addressing Each individual unit within the complex should display a prominent identification number not less than 4 inches in height, contrasting in color to the background to which it is affixed and clearly visible to approaching vehicles and/or pedestrians. Numerals should be no less than 4 inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. Entrances Keep entranceways clear of clutter. Ensure you allow vision from the front access street to front door entrance. Doors Install wooden doors of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of one and three- fourths (1-3/4) inches. This includes the garage or any other pedestrian door. Further, equip all doors with a single cylinder dead-bolt lock using a 5-pin tumbler. Connect the deadbolt to the inner portion of the lock by connecting screws. Ensure the lock has a one- inch throw that can withstand a cutting tool attack. Choose a deadbolt that embeds at least one inch into the strike plate. Arrange all entry and exit doors to dwelling units so that the occupant has a view of the area immediately outside the door without opening the door. Except doors requiring a fire protection rating that prohibits them, a door viewer having a field of view of not less than 190 degrees may provide such a view. Mounting height should not exceed fifty-four inches from the floor. Further, install no glass panels within forty inches ofa locking device. Doors that are partiaUy glass should have a single cylinder dead-bolt lock. Equip these doors with a burglar resistant glaze to prevent someone from breaking the glass to enter the home. Latch covers are suggested on all common area doors or garage area doors. Strike Plates Strike plates for deadbolts on all wood framed doors should be constructed of a minimum 16 U.S. gauge steel, bronze, or brass and secure to the jamb by a minimum of two screws, which should penetrate at least two inches into the solid backing beyond the surface to which the strike is attached. Hinges Hinges for oust-swinging doors should be equipped with non-removable hinge pins or a mechanical interlock to preclude removal of the door from the exterior by removing the hinge pins. Keying Upon occupancy by the owner, each single unit in a tract constructed under the same general plan, should have locks using combinations that are interchange free from locks used in all other separate dwellings. Windows Choose movable windows with security hardware to prevent them from being lifted from the frame or forced to slide. MaU Boxes Mailboxes should be located in highly visible areas adjacent to common areas. Commercial Recommendations Lighting All types of exterior doors should be illuminated during the hours of darkness, with a minimum maintained one foot-candle of light, measured within a five-foot radius on each side of the door at ground level. Recessed areas of buUdings or fences, which have a minimum depth of two feet, a minimum height of five feet, and do not exceed six feet in width and are capable of human concealment, should be illuminated with a minimum maintained 0.25 foot-candles of light at ground level during the hours of darkness. This recommendation applies to defined recessed areas, which are within six feet of the edge of a designated walking surface with an unobstructed pathway to it, not hindered by walls or hedgerow landscaping a minimum of two feet in height. Stairways should be illuminated with a minimum maintained one foot-candle of Ught on all landings and stair treads, during the hours of operation, including one hour theresifter. All exterior pedestrian walkways, interior common corridors, and open parking lots should be illuminated with a minimum maintained one foot-candle of light on the walking or driving surface during the hours of operation and one hour thereafter. The parking and drive surface lighting should have a rated average bulb life of not less than 10,000 hours. Accessible luminaries should have vandal resistant Ught fixtures and be not less than three feet in height from ground level when used to illuminate walkways and a minimum of eight feet in height from ground level when illuminating surfaces associated with vehicles. Light fixtures should be deemed accessible if mounted within fifteen feet vertically or six feet horizontaUy from any accessible surface or any adjoining roof, balcony, landing, stair tread,, platform or similar structure. Landscaping The police department recommends that the exterior landscaping be kept at a minimal height and fullness, giving police, security services and the general public surveillance capabUities into and out of the area. Growth characteristics of plants and their placement in relation to potentially vulnerable areas and especially lighting should be considered. Plant low-profile bushes and shrubs, not exceeding three feet in height. Do not plant landscaping higher than three feet in front of windows or in parking areas. Create space between the bottom of trees and the tops of bushes or shrubs. Make sure tree canopies are not lower than six feet. Landscaping should not detract from lighting. Keep entranceways clear of clutter. Design perimeter landscaping to allow vision into the property, particulsirly parking areas and buUding access doors. Use security landscaping in areas to deter loitering or entrance where pedestrians are not wanted. Addressing Numerals should be located where they are clearly visible from the street on which they are addressed. They should be of a color contrasting to the background to which they are affixed. Numerals should be no less than six inches in height, if located less than 100 feet from the centeriine of the addressed street or 12 inches in height if placed further than 100 feet from the centeriine of the addressed street. The numerals should be illuminated during the hours of darkness. The rear doors of all building should have address numbers not less than six inches in height and be of a color contrasting to the background to which they are affixed. Doors The poUce department recommends that hollow steel doors be a minimum sixteen (16) U.S. gauge and have sufficient reinforcement to maintain the designed thickness of the door when any locking device is instaUed. Only use glass doors with fully tempered glass or rated burglary resistant glazing. Protect all exterior doors with security hardware. Equip all doors with a latch cover constructed of steel. Ensure the latch cover is a minimum of .125 inch thick. Attach the latch cover to the outside by welding or with non-removable bolts spaced apart on not more than ten-inch centers. Construct the jamb of all aluminum frame-swinging doors to withstand 1600 pounds of pressure in both a vertical distance of three inches and horizontal distance of one inch each side of the strike, to prevent violation of the strike. Equip rear doors used for shipping and receiving and employee entrances with a viewer. A single or double door shall be equipped with a double cylinder deadbolt with a bolt projection exceeding one inch or a hook-shaped or expanding deadbolt that engages the strike sufficiently to prevent spreading. The deadbolt lock shall have a minimum of five-pin tumblers and a cylinder guard. Windows Equip movable windows with security hardware and burglar resistant glazing. Cover other vulnerable non-movable windows with burglar resistant glazing. Windows of commercial buildings are vulnerable to breakage during the hours of darkness when the business is non-operationad especially vdndows within 40 inches of any door locking mechanism Glaze should be constructed of either two part laminated glazing vrith a 0.60 inch inner layer or burglary resistant glazing Trash Enclosures Position the trash enclosures away from areas of shipping and receiving. Alarm System When considering an alarm system, the police department recommends a verified system in an effort to eliminate false alarm activations and increase breach detection. A vierified system is verified through audio or visual components. If considering electronic assess as a security feature, consider managed electronic access. By, Jodeene R. Sasway Crime Prevention Specialist Carlsbad Police Department (619)931-2195 City of Carlsbad DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM Date: 03/28/2006 From: Christopher Scobba, Associate Engineer To: Housing and Redevelopment c/o Cliff Jones, Assistant Planner Applicant: Richard & Richard Construction 234 Ventura Street, Suite 100 San Marcos, CA 92078 Subject: First Review of Minor Subdivision, (RP 06-03) for Completeness and Initial Issues. Project Name/Address: Rosevelt Center (APN 203-292-15-17 &19-00) / 560-562 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008 The application for "Roosevelt Center" has been deemed incomplete, as submitted. Attached, please fmd a list of completeness issues and general engineering issues, along with issues identified by other applicable review disciplines/agencies. The completeness issues must be satisfied and/or submitted to complete your application. All items must be submitted simultaneouslv at the Communitv Development Building counter and a copy of this letter with attachments must be included with your submittals. No processing of your application can occur until the application has been determined to be complete. When all required materials are submitted, the City has 30 days to make a determination of completeness. If the application is determined to be complete, processing for a decision on the application will be initiated. In addition, please note that you have six months from the date the application was initially filed, 03/03/2006, to either resubmit the application or submit the required information. Failure to resubmit the application or to submit the materials necessary to determine your application complete shall be deemed to constitute withdrawal of the application. If an application is withdrawn or deemed withdrawn, a new application must be submitted. If you or the owner has any questions, please call me at (760) 602-2747. Respectfully, Chris Scobba, PE Associate Engineer Development Services Attachments: Completeness & General Issues Created by: Chris Scobba Page 1 of 1 03/28/2006 COMPLETENESS & GENERAL ISSUES ENGINEERING-COMPLETENESS ISSUES: RP 06-03 Roosevelt Center (First Review) Incomplete Issues-General; 1. The proposed residential untits for sale will require a parcel map for minor subdivision. Please see the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code for specific requirements regarding condominium subdivisions. 2. Please update expiration date for Landscape architect to 9-30-07 on each sheet. 3. Please revise the sheet format to be specific to discretionary plans rather than the ministerial permit plan format. 4. Please affix an RCE seal to the civil sheet with current registration information. 5. Please delineate and label the existing building at the southwest comer of the site and specify demolition/treatment. Incomplete Issues-Site Plan; 1. Please delineate and provide typical dimensions for all proposed parking stalls and drive isles. 2. Please relocate all gate swings to be entirely within the property or reverse the swing direction toward the property rather than the ROW. Incomplete Issues-Grading; I. According to Table 1. Standard Development Proiect & Priority Proiect Storm Water BMP Requirements Matrix. According to the City of Carlsbad Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan -Storm Water Standards (Available for download at http://www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us/stormwater/susmppdf''susmp.pdf) this project is classified as a priority project and accordingly must meet all requirements to mitigate impacts to storm water quality via site design, source control and treatment control BMP's. Please submit for review a Storm Water Management Plan report with your next submittal that discusses project specifics as they relate to all three of these BMP's and how they will reduce, eliminate and treat the pollutants applicable to the restaurant category: Trash & Debris Oxygen Demanding Substances Oil & Grease Bacteria & Viruses and any other applicable pollutants to Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). Please include all analysis /calculations to substantiate treatment control requirements have been met for either flow based or volume base treatment. Appendix D in the Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan -Storm Water Standards manual is to be used as a resource for report development and content. 2. Please complete and submit a Storm Water Quality Project Priority Determination Checklist (attached to civil sheet) completed by a qualified individual. 3. Please provide total wall heights for all existing walls within and adjacent to the subject project, as applicable. 4. Please identify all existing drainage features and improvements within, tributary to, and directly downstream from the subject project. Include all known dimensions, diameters and longitudinal slopes, as applicable for proper evaluation relative to impacts caused by the subject development. 5. Please provide the total disturbed area for the subject project. 6. Please provide total estimated earthwork quantities to accomplish the proposed grading or construction of the subject project. RP Completeness & General Issues.doc Page 1 of 2 RP 06-03-Rooseyelt Center (First Review) 03/28/2006 ENGINEERING-GENERAL ISSUES: RP 06-03 Rosevelt Center (First Review) 1. Please see redline plans for additional comments. 2. Please identify drainage outlets at face of curb, reference the standard drawing that the drain will ultimately be constructed by. 3. Please submit a copy of the projects soils report for evaluation of geotechnical recommendations related to remedial earthwork. 4. Please provide existing/proposed topography based on a City benchmark and reference on the title sheet. 5. Please provide detailed cross sections at the most conservative points along the proposed wall at the property line and adjacent to the existing building at the northeast comer of the project, adjacent to the ROW of Roosevelt Street and along the property line that borders the southwest property line. These sections must fully illustrate the proposed waUs and footings relative to the existing structure and property lines/ROW. You will be called by our staff to pick up a redline check print of the TPM and a copy of this letter for your use in making the requested revisions. Please be advised, this check print must be returned with the revised plans to facilitate continued staff review. If you have any questions regarding the incomplete items or engineering issues of concem, please contact me at 760- 602-2747. If you have questions regarding Planning issues, please call Jessica Galloway at 760-602-463. If you have questions regarding Fire Department issues, please call at 760-602-4663. Respectfully, Chris Scobba, PE Associate Engineer - Development Services Attachments: Redline Comments Storm Water Quality Project Priority Determination Checklist cc: File Deputy City Engineer, Bob Wojcik, RP Completeness & General Issues.doc Page 2 of 2