HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 82-03; Jefferson Senior Housing; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (3)DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
• Assistant City Manager
(714)438-5596
• Building Department
C714) 438-5525
• Engineering Department
(714) 438-5541
• Housing & Redevelopment Department
(714)438-5611
• Planning Department
(714)438^1
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALiFORNIA 92008
Citp of tavlshati
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION:
Oak Avenue.
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Northeast corner of Jefferson Street and
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Conditional use permit to allow the
construction of a 48 unit senior citizen housing project. The
proposed project will consist of five buildings. Construction of
the proposed project will require approximately t,000 cubic yards of
grading.
The City of Carlshad has conducted an environmental review of the
ahove described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation
of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlshad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will
not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued
for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in
the Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on
file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlshad,
CA. 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit
comments in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of
date of publication.
DATED: April 20, 1981
CASE NO: CUP-199
APPLICANT: LADWIG
PUBLISH DATE: April 22, 1981
S C. HA^4AN
Planning Director,
City of Carlsbad
• $100.00 ^
RECEIPT NO: / /TO/
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSNENT FORM - Part I
(To be Completed by APPLICANT)
CASE NO:
DATE:
Applicant: Rick Engineering Company
Address of Applicant: ^088 Pio Pico Boulevard, Suite 202, Carlsbad, CA
Phone Number: (714) 729-4987
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant):
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Description of Project: SRnior hmiRing -i nr-l nHi ng^ 1 bf^drnoTn nnit.q,
laundry, recreation and picnic facilities.
Project Location/Address: East of Jefferson Street between Elm Avenue
and Oak Avenue.
Assessor Parcel Number: 90^ - -^^7, " 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10
Zone of Subject Property: -R^p .
Proposed Use of Site: Residential development for senior citizens
List all other applicable applications related to this project:
Conditional Use Permit.
ND 1
EIR 1
9 r>o<;cribe the activity area, inciuding distinguishing
• naturafanfmann-.^ Characteristics; also provide precxse
slope analysis v/hen appropriate.
The building is to be fully insulated, and limited window
sizes will be used..
ne-cribe energy conservation measures incorporated into
th^ design and/or operation of the project. (For a more
• specific discussion of energy conservation requirements
of the City's EIR Guidelines).
A vacant lot previously used for single family residences,
A large pepper tree exists approximately 100 feet in from
Oak Avenue, and 60 feet in from Jefferson Street. .The site
is at an elevation approximately 2 feet above the sidewalk
A • Tf''"^e?iclln??ll?^^c=lSSe^'^fte ^^^er of units,' schedule of
unit size": raAge of sale prices or rents, and type of
household size expected.
48 units, 480 square feet each. Range of rents is
estimated to be $250.00 to $300.00.
If commercial, indicate the type, whether f
city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area,
aid loading facilities.
N/A
6 If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per
shift, and loading faciaities.
N/A -
If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
Dlovn-ent per shift, estimated occupancy, loading
?i?i?ies. and community benefits to be deriveo from the em
facilities, and commun
project.
N/A
1. ENVIR0MM.5NTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the follov/ing questions by placing a check in the
appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked yes. Attach
additional sheets as necessary)..
1) Could the project significantly change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activity?
2) Could the activity affect the use of a rec-
reational area, or area of important
aesthetic value?
YES NO
X
6) Could thc activity decrease the number of low
and modest cost housing units in the city?
7) Are any of the natural or man-made features
in the activity area uniques, that is, not"
found in other parts of the County, State,
or Nation?
11) Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life?
12) Are there any rare or endangered plant
species in the activity area?
13) Could the activity change existing features
of any of the city's lagoons^ bays, or
tidelands?
3) Could the activity affect the functioning of
an established community or neighborhood? x
4) Could the activity result in the displacement
• of community residents? • X
5) Could the activity increase the number of low
•and moderate cost housing units in the city? X
X
X
8) Could the activity significantly affect a
historical or archaeological site or its - . _ ^
settings? ' '
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation
of a scarce natural resource? X
10) Does the activity area serve as a habitat,
food source nesting place, source of water,
etc. for rare or endangered wildlife on fish X
species? .
X
X
X
14) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches? X_
15) Could the activity result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands? X
22) VJill the activity involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
23) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault?
24) ' Could the activity result in the generation
. of significant amounts of noise?
25) Could the activity result in the generation
of significant amounts of dust?
26) Will the activity involve the buming of brush,
trees, or other materials?
28) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.)?
29) Will there be a.significant change to existing
land form?
-4-
X
JL
16) Could the activity serve to encourage develop-
ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify
development of already developed areas? •
17). Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water, ' '
noise, etc)?
18) Will the activity reguire certification,
authorization or issuance of a permit by any
local, state cr federal environmental control
agency? X
19.) V7ill the activity require issuance of a
variance or conditional use permit by the city? X
20) V7ill the activity involve the application, use,
or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? X^
21) . V7ill the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain? . X
X
X
X
X
JL
27) Could the activity result in a significant
change in the quality of any portion of the
region's air or water resources? (Should note, X
surface, ground water, off-shore). .
X
X
(a) indicate estimated gradinq to be done in
cubic yards 1000 cy.
(b) percentage of alteration to the present
land form ^ O . 5% "
(c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes
- 2 feet .
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains, or
streets? " ' ^
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger"
project or series of projects? .. . ^
-5"
II. STATBIENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions
in Section I but you think the activity will have no
significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons
below:
The site has been previously disturbed by construction.
Houses have since been demolished. Surrounding uses are
all of an urban nature.
III. co^^^E^TS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions
attach additional sheets as may be needed).
Signature
(Person completing report)
Date Signed
-6-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMF-NT FQIIM - Part II
(To Be Completed By The
PLANNING DEPARMNT)
CASE NO. <r^A ;9f
DATE:
I. BACKGROUND
1. APPLIC/Wr: ^oiev'^ L^/wi^
2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF.APPLICANT: fyj/^ys ^O^^
3. DAI'E aiECICLIST SUBMITTED: /
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
TEXi^IAK/VTIONS OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE ANS1\^RS ARE TO BE MITTEN UNDER •
Section III - DISCUSSIQI\^ OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVi\LUATION)
Yer Maybe No
1. Earth Will the proposal have signi-
ficaKu results in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic subs true t"ures?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. Tlie destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off
tlie site?
b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or overcovering of the soil? _____
1/
f. Changes in deposition or ero-
sion of beach sands, or changes
tn siltation, deposition or erosion
which may inodjfy tlie cliannel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any hay, inlet or lake? ' ' ' ' K
ND 2
#
Yes Maybe No
Air: Will the proposal have signi-
rcsults in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration .
of ambient air quality? ^
b. The creation of objectionable ' *'
odors?
c. Alteration of air movement,
mositure or temperature, or any '
• change in climate, either locally
or regionally? 1/
3. Water: Will the proposal have sigi-
ficant results in:
a. Changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water move-
ments, in either marine or fresh
waters? )/
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage pattems, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters? 1/
d. Change in the amount of sur- y
face water in any water body? ^ ' - l/^
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? ' 1/^^
f, Alteration of the direction
qr rate of flow of. ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of
ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for
public water supplies? '
-2-
Yes Maybe No
•\
^' Plant Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of plants (including trees, shrubs, . . \.
grass, crops, microflora and /
aquatic plants)? • ^
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
• species of plants?
. • c. Introduction of new species
of plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
^* Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species
of animals into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing
fish or wildlife habitat?
6, • Noise, Will the proposal signi-
ficantly increase existing noise
levels?
7, Light and Glare. Will thc pro-
posal significantly produce new
light or glare?
8, Land Use. Will the proix>sal have
sigmlicant results in thc. alteration
of the present or planned land use of
an area?
-3-
i/_
i/
a. Changes in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benthic organisms, insects or /
microfauna) ? _____ " _____
V
i/
V
Yes Maybe No
9. Natural Res.ources. Will the pro-
posal have significant results in:
a. Increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal
involve a significant rislc of an
explosion or the release of haz-
ardous substances (including, but
not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset
conditions?
11. Population. Will the proposal
significantly alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of
an area?
Housing. Will the proposal signi-
ficantly affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional
housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will
the proposal have significant re- '
suits in:
a. Generation of additional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
c» Impact upon existing trans-
portation systems?
d. Alterations to present
patterns of circulation or move-
ment of people and/or goods?
Alterations to watcrbornc,
rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards
to motor vehicles^ bicyclists or
pedestrians?
-4-
Yes Maybe No
Public Servdces. Will the pro-
posal have a significant effect
upon, or have significant results
in the•need for new or altered
govemmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facili-
ties,- including roads?
f. Other govemmental seirvices?
Energy. Will the^proposal have
signiTicant results in;^
a. Use of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy?
b. " Demand upon existing sources
of energy, or require the develop-
ment of new sources of energy?
Utilities. Will the proposal have'
significant results in the need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic thinks?
e. . Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
y
y
y
y
y
1/
17^ • Human Hcaltli. Will thc proposal
Have signigicant results in tlie
creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding . y
mental health)? ' ' ' ' ' ' ' iy
Yes Maybe No
Aesthetics. Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view
open to the public, or will the pro-
posal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open y
to public view? ^ ' ^ ' \X
19. Recreation. Will the proposal have
significant results in the impact
upon the quality or quantity of y
existing recreational opportunities? ^
20. Archeological/Historical. Will the
proposal have significant results
in the alteration of a significant
' archeological or historical site, /
structure, object or building? _____ ' ^
21. ANALYZF VIABL,E ALTERNATIVES TO TIIE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Pl^iASED DPy'LLOPMENT OF THE PROJECT; b) ALlEmiE SITE
DESIGNS; c) ALTEHWE SCALE OF DEmOPMFM^; d) ALTERNATE
USES FOR UIE SITE; e) -DE\^ELOPMENT AT SOME EUIURE TBE RA'].l7ER
TflAN NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR TIIE PROPOSED USE; g) NO
PROJECT /vLTERNATI\a3.
-6-
y
Yes Maybe No
22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE ITIE POTEN-
TIAL TO DEGRADE THE QUALITY OF
UIE ENVIRONMENT, OR CURTAIL ThIE y
DIVERSITY IN THE ENVIRONMENT? ^ . ^
b) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE THE POTEN-
TIAL TO ACHIE\^ SHORT-TERiM, TO
THE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG-imM,
ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS? (A SHORT-
TERM IMPACT ON TFE ENVIRO>JMENT
IS ONE WIIICH OCCURS IN A RE-
LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE
PERIOD OF TIME WHILE LONG-TERM
IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL INTO
THE FU^rURE.)
c) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS
WHICH ARE INTilVIDUALLY LIMITED,
BUT CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE?
(A PROJECT. MAY IMPACT ON TlN'O
OR >DPxE SEPARATE RESOURCES v
M-ERE THE IMPACT ON EACH RE-
SOURCE IS RELATimY SMALL,
BUT WHERE THE EFFECT OF TIE
TOTAL OF H-IOSE IMPACTS ON THE
ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.) " '
d) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE EN\aRON-
MENTAL EFFECTS WHICH WILL
CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE
EFFECTS ON I»1AN BEINGS,
EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY?
III.- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONNENTAL EVALUTION
y
y
-7-
DTsniSSinN OF FN'^/IRONMF.NTAL E\W.UATIOM (Continued)
IV. DETEMINATION. (TO BE COMPLETED BY HE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
^ effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will
be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. A conditional negative declaration will
will be prepared.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect
on the environment, and an ENVIRONNENTAI. BEACT REPORT
is required.
' — ~ ' Signature
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
-9-