HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 82-11; Baker Burger Drive Thru; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (3)FEE $100.00
RECEIPT NO:
Applicant:
ENVIRQNMENT>\L IMPACT ASSESSNENT FORM - Part I
CTo be Completed by APPLICANT)
CASE NO:
DATE:
Neal T. Baker
Address of Applicant: 171 North "H" Street, San Bernardino, Calif. 92410
Phone Number: ( 884-7241
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant)
James R. Davis, 205 S. "D" St., San Bernardino, Calif. 714- 888-7183
GENERAL INFORimTION:
Description of Project: Remodel and add to existing drive thru restaurant
Project Location/Address: 2952 Harding St., Carlsbad, California
Assessor Parcel Number: . 355 - ^
Zone of Subj ect Property: j.^^ , \ '
Proposed Use of Site: Restaurant with drive-thru window
List all other applicable applications related to this project:
None
ND 1
EIR 1
;2. ^ Describe the activity area, including distinguishing natural
and man-made characteristics; also provide precise slope
analysis when appropriate.
Now Drive-thru - paved flat area
3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the
design and/or operation of the project. (For a more specific
discussion of energy conservation requirements, see
of the city's EIR Guidelines).
Fully insulated building
4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit
sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household
size expected.
n/a
5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city
or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and
loading facilities.
672 sq.ft. kitchen (existing)
588 sq.ft. dining room ( addition)
200 sq.ft. loading area (existing)
6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,
and loading facilities.
n/a
7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the
project.
n/a
I.- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the
appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked "yes".
Attach additional sheets as necessary.)
3) Could the activity affect the functioning of
an established community or neighborhood?
5) Could the activity increase the number of low
and modest cost housing units in the city?
6) Could the activity decrease the number of low
and modest cost housing units in the city?
7) Are any of the natural or man-made features
in the activity area unique; that is, not
found in other parts of the County, State or
Nation?
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation
of a scarce natural resource?
10) Does the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation
of a scarce natural resource?
11) Could the activity significantly affect
fish, wildlife or plant life?
13) Could the activity change existing features
of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or
tidelands?
-3-
YES NO
1) Could the project significantly change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activity? x_
2) Could the activity affect the use of a recre-
ational area, or area of important aesthetic
value? X
X
4) Could the activity result in the displacement
of community residents? ^
X
X
X
8) Could the activity significantly affect a
historical or archaeological site or its
settings? x
X
X
X
12) Are there any rare or endangered plant
species in the activity area? . x_
X
•14) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches? x
15) Could the activity result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands?
16) Could the activity serve to encourage develop-
ment of presently undeveloped areas or intensify
development of already developed areas?
26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
27) Could the activity result in a significant
change in the quality of any portion of the
region's air or water resources? (Should note,
surface, ground water, off-shore).
X
X
X
17) will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water, X
noise, etc.)?
18) Will the activity require certification,
authorization or issuance of a permit by any
local, state or federal environmental control
agency?
19) Will the activity require issuance of a
variance or conditional use permit by the city? X
20) Will the activity involve the application, use,
or disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
21) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain?
22) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
X
X
X
23) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault? x_
24) Could the activity result in the generation
of significant amounts of noise? x_
25) Could the activity result in the generation
of significant amounts of dust? X
X
X
28) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, X
etc.)?
29) Will there be a significant change to existing ^
land form?
-4-
(a) indicate estimated grading to be done in
• cubic yards non^
(b) percentage of alteration to the present
land form none
(c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes
none
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains, or
streets?
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger x
project or series of projects?
II STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions
in Section I but you think the activity will have no
significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons
below:
Conditional use permit is only
a Re-Issue of ex isting permit
III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE OUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions,
attached additional sheets as may be needed.)
Signature
Date Signed
son i^omj^leting report)
1-20-83
-6-
DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVIOES
LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989
(619) 438-5591
Citp of Carl^Stiab
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PRDJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: East side of Harding Streetr north of Elm
Avenue.
PRDJECT DESC31IPTI0N: Request for approval of a Redevelopment Permit
to remodel and enlarge the existing drive-thru restaurant.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation
of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not
have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the
subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Land Use Planning Office.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on
file in the Land Use Planning Office, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, CA. 92008, Comments from the public are invited. Please
submit comments in writing to the Land Use Planning Office within ten
(10) days of date of issuance.
DATED: January 28, 1983
CASE NO: RP 82-11
APPLICANT: Bakers Burgers
PUBLISH DATE: February 5, 1983
MI(3IAEL J. HOLZMILLER
^ Land Use Planning Manager
ND-4
5/81