HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 83-02; K & K Vitamins; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (3)FEE: $100
RECEIPT NO:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I
(To Be Completed by APPLICANT)
CASE NO:
DATE: • March 7, 1983
Applicant: Alex & Claire Marie Kononchuk
Address of Applicant: 2l60 V/armlands Ave.,
Vista, Ca. 92083
Phone Number: (6l9 ) 758-2352; 438-4414
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than
Applicant): None
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Description of Project: Addition to existing building as follows:
Approximately 15OO sq. ft. storage & office to front
Project Location/Address : 3305 Tyler St.,
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
Assessor Parcel Number: 204 - 070 - 08
Zone of Subject Property : M - Industrial
Proposed Use of Site: Manufacturinf?;. Warehouse
List all other applicable applications related to this project: None
2. Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man-
made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when
appropriate.
Activity area: Industrial
Natural Characteristics: Essentially level; no trees or grass
Man-Made Characteristics: Railroad tracks to rear of property
3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design
and/or operation of the project.
a. 480 Volt power f. 277 Volt Lighting
b. Heat Pumps g. Thermopane Windows
c. Extra Skylights
d. Passive Solar Collector
e. Solar Hot Water Heat
4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes,
range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected.
Not,applicable .
5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or
regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities.
Not applicable
6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and
loading facilities.
a. Manufacturing & Warehouse
b. 2^ to 35 people
c. 1 - 12* X 12' door - dock height
1 - l6' X 12' door - ground height
7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per
shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits
to be derived from the project.
Not applicable
-2-
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate
space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as
necessary.)
YES NO
1) Could the project significantly change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activity? X
2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational
area, or area of important aesthetic value? ^
3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood? X_
4) Could the activity result in the displacement of
community residents? X_
5) Could the activity increase the number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city? X
6) Could the activity decrease the number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city? X_
7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the
activity area unique, that is, not found in other
parts of the county, state or nation? X_
8) Could the activity significantly affect an
historical or archaeological site or its settings? X_
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource? X
10) Does the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource? X
11) Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life? X^
12) Are there any rare or endangered plant species
in the activity area? X_
13) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? X
14) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches? X_
15) Could the activity result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands? X_
16) Could the activity serve to encourage development
of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop-
ment of already developed areas? X_
-3-
YES NO
17) Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water,
noise, etc.)?
18) Will the activity require certification, authoriza-
tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or
federal environmental control agency?
19) Will the activity require issuance of a variance
or conditional use permit by the City?
20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or
disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
21) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain?
22) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault?
23) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
24) Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of noise?
25) Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of dust?
26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
27) Could the activity result in a significant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's air
or water resources? (Should note surface, ground
water, off-shore.)
28) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)?
29) Will there be a significant change to existing
land form?
(a) Indicate estimated grading to be done in
cubic yards: 1240 .
(b) Percentage of alteration to the present
land form: 30 .
(c) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes:
30:: •
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets?
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger
project or series of projects?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-4-
II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section
I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental
effects, indicate your reasons below:
III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach
additional sheets as needed.)
Signature
(person Completing Report)
Date Signed
-5-
ENVll^lXMl-mi. IMPACT A3S}:SSMI:M' FOI^I - I>art II
(To Be CciTinlctccl Bv Tlie
PL^\NING DEPMIMI'-NT)
CASE NO
DATE:
I. BACKGROUND
1.
2.
APPLIQW: /e)(.'h ^/^^'rr A^^fyjf /(c/^c/ycJt^ ^ (^.//f. ]/j^J 4^f)
ADDRESS AND PIiON'E NUIBER OF APPLICANT:
t^/^ A, C^y fxo% 3
3. DATE CliECKLTST SUT3MrnED: y?^y(j //, /^^3
II. ENVTROv:sIENTAI, IMPACTS
TEXl>Li"LVVi'10N3 OF ALL AFFIRMATRTE ^^^SlvERS ARE TO BE ^vRITTEN UNDER
Section III - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRON^-IENTAL EmUATION)
Yes Maybe
1. Earth Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
chanqes in f^eoloaic substiuctures?
b. Disniptions, displacements, com-
petction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, citlicr on or off
thc site?
f. Changes in deposition or ero-
sion of l)each sands, or changes
in sj'Jtat.icMi, deposition or erosion
wiiich may iiu)dil"y the clinnnel ol' a
river or st ream or the LIHI of Ih.e •
0C(\'ni or any h;iy, in]el or laKe?
No
y-
_ y
y
y
y
Nl) 1
2. Air: IVill the proposal have signi-
results in:
Yes Maybe No
3.
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Alteration of air movement,
mositure or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
Water: Will the proposal have sigi
"ficant results in:
y
y
y
a. Changes in airrents, or the
course or direction of v;ater move-
inents, in either marine or fresh
waters?
b. Changes in absorj^tion rates,
drainage pattems, or the rate and
amount of surface water iimoff?
c. Alterations to the course or
flow- of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of sur-
face water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of tlie direction
or rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of
ground waters, either througii
direct additions or witiidrawals,
or tiirough interception oT an
aquifer hy cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in'the amount of
water otiierwise available for
public v.'ater sup])Jies?
y
y
y
7<
y
y
-2-
•)
Yes Maybe No
^' Plant Life. Will thc proposal have signi-
Ticant results in: . ' •
a. Change in tlie diversity of
species, or nuiiihers of any species
of plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and
aquatic plants)? . ^
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any unic[ue, rare or endangered
species of plants? • ^
c. Introduction of new species
of plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species? X
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop? ___ " " /(
^' Animal Life. V/ill the proposal have signi-
ficantTTesuits in:
a. Changes in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land aniir^ils
including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benthic organismis, insects or
microfauna)? " ' ^
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any tmique, rare or endangered
species of animials? • '. ' •
c. Introduction of new species
of anim.als into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration or
movement of anijiials? ' . ^
d. Deterioration to existing
fish or wildlife habitat? ' . • X
6, ' Noise. Will the proposal signi-
Ticantly increase existing noise
levels? ^ X
Light and Clare. Will thc pro-
. posal significantly produce new
light or glare? /V
8. L'^'liL ^^'^'-^-^ proposal have
SJg.nI ricant rc^sult .^, in tho :i11(u\'ition
of the prc'seiu or planned hind use of
an area? y
Yes Maybe No
^' Natural Resources. V/ill the pro ^
posal have significant results in
a. Increase in tlie rate of use
of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an „
explosion or the release of haz-
ardous substances (including, but
not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in tlie
event of an accident cr upset
conditions?
11. Population. V/ill the proposal
significantly alter the location^
distribution, density^ or growxh
rate of the human population of
an area?
12. Housing. V/ill the proposal signi-
ficantly affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional
housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation, Ivill
. . i>~ ^ . 1 , . _
the proposal have significant re-
sults in:
a. Generation of additional
veh icu 1 ar m.ovemen t ?
b.. Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
c Impact upon existing trans-
portation system.s?
d.. Alterations to present
patterns of circulation or rniove-
inent of people and/or goods?
e.. Alterations to w^aterbomej
rail or air traffic?
r\ Increase in traffic hazards
to m^otor vehicles^ bicyclists or
pedestrians?
y
y
X
y
y
y
X
-4-
Yes Mnybe No
P'-^^^ "^c Services. Will the pro-
posal have a signiCicant effect
upon, or liavc significant results
in thc need for new or altered
governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire pi^otection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facili-
ties, including roads?
f. Other govemmental sendees?
15. Energy. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Use of substantial ajriounts of
fuel or energy?
b. Demand upon existing sources
of energy, or require the develop-
Ficnt of new sources of energy?
litilities. Will thc proposal have
significant results in the need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b.. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. , Sewer or septic tanks?
e. . Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
U^'liL^ilJL^j^^^^^' ^^•'^^^ ^-^^^^ proposal
have sii'.nn'jcant results in the
creat ion c>r any hcilth hnzartl or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
_2L
y-
yy
X
y
yy
yy
yy
-X-
:s-
• Yes Maybe No
Aesthetics. Will thc proposal have
significant results in the obstruc- .
tion.of any scenic vista or view
open to thc public, or will the pro-
posal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open
to public view? ^
19. Recreation. V/ill the proposal have
significant results in the impact
upon the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities? ^
20. Archeological/Historical. Will the
proposal i^xave significant results
in the alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site,
structure, object or building? X
21. ANALYZF VIABLE ALTI-mTI\a:;3 TO TIIE PROPOSFD PROJFCT SUCH AS:
a) PHASED DEAlLOPMIiXl' OF ll-¥ PROJIiCT; b) M/iEiimiE SITE
DESIGNS; c) ALTFI^^ATE SCUF OF DEVELOP^'FNT; d) ALTFRMAIE
• USES FOR THE SITH; e) DE\T^LOFMFNT AT SC>E FUrURE 11^33 RATiTZR
THAN N0]\'; f) ALTFllN^VIE SITES FOR TliE PROPOSFD USE; g) NO
PROJFCT ALTE!IN.\TIVE.
-6-
22. MWIATORY Fr:n]NGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) DOES THI' PROJECT IIWE VAE VOTl'N-
TLU TO FFCPADF THF QJALITY OF
nm ENVIPvON-MENT, OR QiRTAIL THE
DRT:RSriY IN IHF ENVI liOXMENT?
b) DOES IFIE PROJFCT ILWT. THG POTEN-
TIAL TO ACHIFVF SHORT-IEllM, TO
THE DlSAD\^\:aAGE OF LONG-IERM,
EN¥IR0N7-!FM:-VL GOALS? fA SHOPvT-
TEl^l IMPACT ON IHE E^/VIRON^ENT
IS ONE V/HICH OCCURS IN A RE-
LATm-LY BRIEF, DEFINITR^
PERIOD OF TIME V.IHLE LONG-lEPxM
IMPACTS V/ILL E>OTIE UELL INTO
THE ITJTUPvE.)
c) DOES THE PROJECT EAYE BRACTS
. IMIICH ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMIITD,
BUT ai-rULATRTLY CONSIDEIUBLE?
(A PROJECT M^Y IMPACT ON 'HvO
OR MORE SEP.\RAIE RESOURCES
IVHFI^ THE IMPACT ON EACH RE-
SOURCE IS I^IATRTBLY SM\LL,
BUI' V.IIFRE ILIE EFFECI OP THE
TOTAI. OF' THOSE IMPACTS ON UE
EN\ai^NM[:NT IS SIGNIFICANT.)
d) DOES TITE PROJECT HA\T ENYIRON-
MENTAL EFFECTS lailCH WILL
. CAUSE SUBSIANTIAL AD\TRSE
EFFECTS ON IRIMAN BEINGS,
EIIIlfZR DIIOiCTLY OR INUIPOECTLY?
Yes . Maybe No
y
X
X
III,- DISCUSSION OF ENVIRON'^^IENTAL B^xUIITION
^?<;^//y %^%02 ;/i/y^5AA/ A/^'/.^. ^/^si^ruc/fcyo
-7-
IV. DEII-RMINATION. (TO BE COH^LEIED BY HIE PL\NNING DEPAini^UiNT)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X I find thc proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGVllVE DECLMOTION will
be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect'on tiie environment, there will not be
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to thc proiect. A conditional negative declaration will
will be .prepared,
I find the proposed project ^F\Y have a significant effect
on tlie envirormient, and" an E^/IROK'TENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required.
Date: i V. //-^^"^
Signature
V. MITIGATING MFASUPES (IF /\PPLICABLE)
-9