HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 84-05; Indiana Plumbing; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (3)FEE: $100
RECEIPT NO:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I
(To Be Completed by APPLICANT)
CASE NO:
DATE:
Applicant: 'J^^Uf(i fi /JPt P I^^/^^ Di ^ u p ^ ly Co ,
Address of Applicant: 3/3:5^ l^y / 0 ly S 7^ C/] /?^ CA ,
Phone Nuraber: (/4 ) ^ > ^ - ;r .i>.b'
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than
Applicant): jjt^fy yJ K IH c^k^y -3/3o' /^^ Uir St, Cf\ r J n . y.;
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Description of Project: 'J 0 0 t 0 fa. / r v^/) /j ^ - ^ n.iS 1 fC U
Project Location/Address: 3/3.^f y In Sl . C^f ^h/)-"'^ '1 y ^y .r
Assessor Parcel Number: 7^ O H ^ - 0 I O - <^ 3j C ^ v^, 7
Zone of Subject Property:
Proposed use of Site: {/d j^, t Uy/> /r D U tV; t /c ^ Q ^: /^ ^ ..^^
List all other applicable applications related to this project: y[J/ /••]
Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man-
made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when
appropriate. ^ , /- . . /
3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design
and/or operation of the project.
4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes,
range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected.
AJ /A
5.
6.
or
.ng
If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city
regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loadi
facilities. ^
" "HJ.J-M<^'^ ..oL^'oaC-^ ^ t^e^ ii ''''
If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and
loading facilities.
r
7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per
shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits
to be derived from the project.
-2-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate
space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as
necessary.)
YES NO
1) Could the project significantly change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activity?
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
10) Does the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
13) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands?
14) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches?
15) Could the activity result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands?
6) Could the activity serve to encourage development
of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop-
ment of already developed areas?
-3-
/L
2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational ^
area, or area of important aesthetic value? /y
3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an /
established community or neighborhood? X
4) Could the activity result in the displacement of y
community residents? X
5) Could the activity increase the number of low and i#
modest cost housing units in the city? X
6) Could the activity decrease the number of low and ^
modest cost housing units in the city? X
7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the
activity area unique, that is, not found in other . ,
parts of the county, state or nation? X
8) Could the activity significantly affect an
historical or archaeological site or its settings?
X
11) Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life? X
12) Are there any rare or endangered plant species v/
in the activity area? X
X
/
X
X
YES NO
Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water,
noise, etc.)?
18) Will the activity require certification, authoriza-
tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or
federal environmental control agency?
19) Will the activity require issuance of a variance
or conditional use permit by the City?
20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or
disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
21) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain?
22) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault?
23) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
24) Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of noise?
25) Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of dust?
26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
27) Could the activity result in a significant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's air
or water resources? (Should note surface, ground
water, off-shore.)
28) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)?
29) Will there be a significant change to existing
land form?
(a) Indicate estiraated grading to be done in
cubic yards: /d Q e y^j/^ Al/^X.
(b) Percentage of alteration to the present
land form: ; .
(c) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes:
A)0/<i^
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets?
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger
project or series of projects?
y
y
y
X
y
X
1
X
-4-
II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section
I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental
effects, indicate your reasons below:
III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach
additional sheets as needed.)
Signature ^^//ri^<-^^^^ - ^flj/-^-^
(Person Completing Report)
Date Signed / ( 7^ ^
-5-
ENVIRONNIFJ^rAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part II
(T» Be Cempleted By The
PLANNING DEPARIMENT)
CASE NO. cgf-J"
DATE: d>//^/V'/
I. BACKGROUND
1. APPLICANT
2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT:
3. DATE CHECKLIST SUBMITTED:
II. ENVIRON^.IENTAL IMPACTS
TDCPLANATIONS OF ALL .^FIRM'\TIVE ANSIVERS ARE TO BE WRITTEN UNDER
Section III - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONNDBNTAL EVALUATION)
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off
the site?
f. Changes in deposition or ero-
sion of beach sands, or changes
in siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the •
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
ND 2
)
Yes Maybe No
2. Air: Will the proposal have signi-
results in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Alteration of air movement,
mositure or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
3. Water: Will the proposal have sigi-
ficant results in:
a. Changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water move-
ments, in either marine or fresh
waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage pattems, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of sur-
face water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction
or rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of
ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
-2'
Yes Maybe No
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and
aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species
of plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a. Changes in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, benthic organisms, insects or
microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species
of animals into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing
fish or wildlife habitat?
6. Noise. Will the proposal signi-
ficantly increase existing noise
levels?
7. Light and Glare. Will the pro-
. posal significantly produce new
light or glare?
8. Land Use. Will the proposal have
significant results in the alteration
of thc present or planned land use of
an area?
9. Natural Resources. Will the pro-
posal have significant results in;
a. Increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the release of haz-
ardous substances (including, but
not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset
conditions?
11. Population. Will the proposal
significantly alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of
an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal signi-
ficantly affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional
housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation." Will
the proposal have significant re-
sults in:
a. Generation of additional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
c. Impact upon existing trans-
portation systems?
d. Alterations to present
pattems of circulation or move-
ment of people and/or goods?
e. Alterations, to waterbome,
rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards
to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
.4,
Yes Maybe No
Yes Maybe No
14. Public Services. Will the pro-
posal have a significant effect
upon, or have significant results
in the need for new or altered
govemmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facili-
ties, including roads?
f. Other govemmental services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy?
b. Demand upon existing sources
of energy, or require the develop-
ment of new sources of energy^?
1^* Utilities. Will the proposal have
significant results in the need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. , Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17.. Human Health. Will the proposal
have signigicant results in the
creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental licalth)? y
-S-
Yes Maybe No
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have
sigmficant results in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view
open to the public, or will the pro-
posal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal have
significant results in the impact
upon the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
20. Archeological/Historical. Will the
proposal have significant results
in the alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site, V
structure, object or building? ^
21. ANALYZF VIABLE ./VLTErxNATIVF.S TO THE PROPOSED PROJFCT SUCH AS:
a) PmSED DHVELOPMENl' OP THE PROJECT; b) .UlLRNAIE SITE
DESIGNS; c) xUTEP.NATE SCALE OF DEVELOPNfENT; d) ALTERNATE
• USES FOR THE SITE; e) DEVELOPMENT AT SO^^E FLJTLfRE TIME RA11T.R
THAN NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR m PROPOSED USE; g) NO
PROJECT ALTEimTIVE.
Yes Maybe No
22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) DOES THE PROJECT HA\T^ THE POTEN-
TIAL TO DEGR.ADE ™ QUALITY OF
THE ENVIRONMENT, OR CURTAIL THE
DIVERSITY IN THE ENVIRONMENT?
b) DOES TFE PROJECT HAVE UJE POTEN-
TIAL TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERM, TO
THE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG-TERM,
ENVIRON»\TAL GOALS? (A SHORT-
TERM IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT
IS ONE miCH OCCURS IN A RE-
LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE
PERIOD OF TIME VvTIILE LONG-TERM
IMPACTS WILL ENDURE W^LL INTO
IHE FUTURE.)
c) DOES THE PROJECT HA\TE IMPACTS
WHICH ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITED,
BUT CUMUUTRTLY CONSIDERABLE?
(A PROJECT MAY IMPACT ON TIVO
OR ^DRE SEPARATE P^SOURCES
WHERE THE IMPACT ON EACH RE-
SOURCE IS RELATIVELY SMALL,
BUT WHERE THE EFFECT OF THE
TOTAL OF THOSE IMPACTS ON THE
ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.)
d) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON-
MENTAL EFFECTS WHICH WILL
, CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE
EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS,
EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY?
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUTION
y
^e^/xo^m p/i<^i7o^^ ^^"^ ^^^^
-7-
DTSaiSSTON OF ENVIR0NN'1F.NTAL EVALUATION CContinued)
IV. DETERMmMION. (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will
be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. A conditional negative declaration will
will be .prepared.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect
on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required.
Date: 3 _
Signature
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
-9'
MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued)
VI APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIBVED THE ABOVE MITIGATIONG MEA-
SURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date:
Signature of Applicant
10-
DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989
(619) 438-5591
Citp of Carlfiibab
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PRDJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION:
Avenue and Pine Avenue.
West side of Tyler Street between Oak
PRDJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of a 7,000 square foot warehouse.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation
of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of the City of (Arlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the piroject will not
have a significant inpact on the environment) is hereby issued for the
subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Land Use Planning Office.
A oopy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on
file in the Land Use Planning Office, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue,
Carlsbad, CA. 92008. (jomments from the public are invited. Please
submit ooninents in writing to the Land Use Planning Office within ten
(10) days of date of issuance.
DATED: March 13, 1984
CASE NO: RP 84-5
APPLICANT: Indiana Plumbing
PUBLISH DATE: March 17, 1984
MICHAEL J>sJiOLZMiyffi;R
Land Use Planning Manager
ND-4
5/81