Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 84-09; Besaw Office Building; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (2)1200 ELM AVENUE B^HP^B TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 H.^V J M (619) 438-5541 Office of the City Engineer January 21, 1985 Mr. James A. Besaw Cornerstone Management Company 16131 East Whittier Boulevard, Ste. 100 Whittier, California 90603 REQUESTED REFUND FOR STREET VACATION PR 6.61 Dear Mr. Besaw: This is in reference to your letter of January 7, 1985, requesting a refund of your filing fee for a street vacation. I am enclosing a copy of a letter from your firm dated June 8, 1984, over the signature of Georgia W. Barksdale. That letter represents your original application for a street vacation. There is no reference to "...(the City's) directive and require- ment for the vacation,...". I am prepared to recommend to the City Council that you receive a refund of $266.67. In my informational material to the City Council I will explain your position, and your letter of January 7, 1985. There is no need for you to drive 100 miles to plead your case. Please inform me of your wishes in the matter. Very truly yours. RONALD A. BECKMAN City Engineer RAB :']!&§ :rlh Attachment c: Marty Bouman Chris Salomone WILLIAM C. KROMMENHOEK, A.I.A. JOHN M. McKEOWN, A.I.A. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN 1515 MORENA BOULEVARD, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110-3784 TELEPHONE (619) 276-7710 JANUARY 18, 1985 MAYOR KASLER CITY HALL 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 SUBJECT: JEFFERSON AND GRAND OFFICE BUILDING BESAW PROPERTY DEAR MAYOR: I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU AND THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED PROJECT LAST MONTH. IT HAS TAKEN SEVERAL MONTHS AND MUCH TIME AND EXPENSE TO BRING THE PROJECT ALONG TO THIS STAGE. WE HOPE IT WILL BE AN ASSET TO YOUR REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT OF CARLSBAD. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, YOU QUESTIONED ME AS TO WHETHER WE (KROMMENHOEK/MC KEOWN & ASSOCIATES] WOULD BE INVOLVED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, AND I BELIEVE MY RESPONSE WAS YES, WE WOULD BE THE ARCHITECTS PREPARING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ OVERSEEING THE CONTRACTORS WORKMANSHIP, ETC. THAT WAS THE END OF THE OPEN DISCUSSION AND I ASSUME THAT YOU AND COUNCIL WERE SATISFIED WITH MY ANSWERS AND MY PERSONAL INVOLVEMENT WITH THE PROJECT. UNFORTUNATELY, KMA HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO REACH AN AGREEMENT WITH THE OWNER MR. JAMES BESAW, AND BOTH PARTIES HAVE AGREED TO TERMINATE OUR BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP WITH THIS PROJECT. HE HAS SELECTED SOMEONE ELSE TO CARRY ON WITH THE PROJECT AND WE SINCERELY WISH HIM WELL. WE ENCOURAGE THE CITY TO CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE PROJECT AS IT IS DESIGNED. SENIOR ASSOCIATE: JAMES L MEYERHOFF, A.I.A. ASSOCIATES: THOMAS B. AWBREY, A.l.A./ROMAN E. BECK, A.I.A./DALE E. DREXLER/ JON L. EBERT/TIMOTHY J. RUBESH/ROBERT B. SMITH, A.I.A. MAYOR KASLER JANUARY 18, 1984 PAGE TWO I FELT THAT YOU SHOULD BE INFORMED OF THIS LATEST DEVELOPMENT SINCE YOUR QUESTIONING WAS SO POINTED AT THE TIME OF THE HEARING IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL ME. RESPEI ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KFNDMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES SUITE 100 16131 EAST WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER. CALIFORNIA 90603 714/526-8281 January 7, 1985 Mr. Ronald A. Beckman City Engi n o e T^ City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, Calfiornia 92008 Dear Mr. Beckman: I respectfully submit that the request for vacation was per the request of the planning commission and not myself. If there were any costs incurred, that cost should be borne by planning commission and not me. Had I initiated the action for my own personal benefit, I would concur with your position. It is unconscionable for you to absolve the City of responsibility when it was clearly their directive and requirement for the v^ication, and then subsequent reversal that created the problem. Further, it is unwarranted that I need to petition the council, drive 100 miles and plead my case when this matter should be handled internally, and a full refund be granted. Sincerely, James A/ Besaw /gb cc: Marty Bouman ^ Chris Salomone/ Frank Alshire 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 Office of the City Engineer TELEPHONE (619) 438-5541 Citp of €atl6ha\i January 3, 1985 Mr. 3ames A. Besaw Cornerstone Management Inc. 16131 East Whittier Blvd., Suite 100 Whittier, California 90603 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO PR 6.61 Dear Mr. Besaw: With reference to your letter of December 14, 1984, the California Streets and Highways Code provides that the fee for a street vacation bear a relationship to the cost to the city for processing the application. In the case at hand, we estimate that approximately one-third of the office work in processing a street vacation was performed by the City before the Planning Commission took final action on your project. Accordingly, we can recommend to the City Council that you receive 2/3 refund of the fee paid, which amounts to $266.67. Please let me know if this is satisfactory to you. If it is not, you may petition the City Council for a refund of the full $400.00 amount or, in the alternative, request the City to continue to process your application for a street vacation through the City Council, with whom final authority lies. (The Planning Commission discouraged the street vacation but it did not have the legal authority to deny it.) Very truly yours. RONALD A. BECKMAN City Engineer RAB:MB:lch cc: Marty Bouman Chris Salomone Coiinmtone (Management vd»»c. SUITE 100 16131 EASTWHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER. CALIFORNIA 90603 714/526-8281 December 14, 198A Mr. Ronald Beckman, City Engineer r- A i- -f r* -. "! r. K o ^ O X O _y O i v_. Ci i v.: Cl. \J 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 RE: Proposed Office Building Site 2910 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Beckrnan: In June we were required to vacate a portion of Jefferson Street. In our plan approval process, the committee reversed their feelings and voted to not vacate the six(6) foot strip. They assured me that a request would be submitted for refund. To this date, I have received no response. Would you please follow up this matter for me. Sincerely, a w /gb cc: Chris Salomone i DEVELOPMENTAL • J^T . • AVENUE SERVICES ^£WJM CARLSBAO, CA 92008-1989 LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE ^^j^^ ^^^^^ 438-5591 Citp of CarliSdab November 2, 1984 James A. Besaw 16131 E. Whittier Blvd. Suite 100 Whittier, California 90603 SUBJECT: RP 84-9 - Besaw Preliminary Staff Report The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project has been completed. A copy of the report, including the recom- mendation and conditions, is enclosed. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (D.C.C.) meeting which will be held on November 6, 1984, beginning at 10:00 a.m. If you have any questions concerning the report, you may attend the D.C.C. meeting. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact the Land Use Planning Office at 438-5591. CITY OF CARLSBAD MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Land Use Planning Manager By= A LandUsePlahning Office MJH:ad Enclosure WILLIAM C. KROMMENHOEK, A.I.A. JOHN M. McKEOWN, A.I.A. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCWES 1515 MORENA BOULEVARD, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110-3784 TELEPHONE (619) 276-7710 30 OCTOBER 1984 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA. 92008-1989 ATTENTION: CATHERINE NICHOLAS, PROJECT PLANNER SUBJECT: JEFFERSON AND GRAND OFFICE BUILDING RP 84-9 (BESAW) JOB NO.: 83-184 DEAR MS. NICHOLAS: REGARDING OUR TELEPHONE CONVERSATION THIS MORNING, I AM INCLOSING 14 PRINTS OF THE REVISED PLANS FOR YOUR USE IN REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. PLEASE INCORPORATE THESE PRINTS WITH THE SUBMITTAL DATED JULY 18, 1984. PLEASE ADVISE US IF YOU REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESPECTFULLY, SENIOR ASSOCIATE: JAMES L MEYERHOFF, A.I.A. ASSOCIATES: THOMAS B. AWBREY, A.I.A./ROMAN E. BECK, A.I.A./DALE E. DREXLER/ JON L EBERTmMOTHY J. RUBESH/ROBERT B. SMITH, A.I.A. WILLIAM C. KROMMENHOEK, A.I.A. JOHN M. McKEOWN, A.I.A. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES 1515 MORENA BOULEVARD, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110-3784 TELEPHONE (619) 276-7710 SEPTEMBER 25, 1984 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 ATTENTION: CATHERINE NICHOLAS, PROJECT PLANNER SUBJECT: JEFFERSON AND BRAND OFFICE BUILDING RP 84-9 (BESAW) PROJECT NUMBER 83-184 DEAR MS. NICHOLAS: ENCLOSED ARE 14 PRINTS OF THE REVISED PLANS FOR YOUR USE IN REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. PLEASE INCORPORATE THESE PRINTS WITH THE SUBMITTAL DATED JULY 18, 1984. I TRUST THAT THE REVISIONS TO THIS DESIGN ARE ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY AND WE CAN RECEIVE APPROVAL AT THE OCTOBER 11, 1984 MEETING. THE REVISIONS PROVIDE 1) MORE GARAGE PARKING; 2) REVISIONS TO THE BUILDING AREA SO THAT IT BALANCES WITH PARKING RATIOS. PLEASE ADVISE US IF YOU REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OWN, AIA CC: JIM BESAW SENIOR ASSOCIATE: JAMES L MEYERHOFF, A.I.A. ASSOCIATES: THOMAS B. AWBREY, A.I.A./ROMAN E. BECK, A.I.A./DALE E. DREXLER/ JON L EBERT/TIMOTHY J. RUBESH/ROBERT B. SMITH, A.I.A. DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5591 Cttp of CarlStjab August 31, 1984 Krommenhoek/McKeown & Associates 1515 Morena Boulevard San Diego, California 92110 SUBJECT: RP 84-i^ - Besaw Preliminary Staff Report The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project has been completed. A copy of the report, including the recom- mendation and conditions, is enclosed. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (D.C.C.) meeting which will be held on September 4, 1984, beginning at 10:40 a.m. If you have any questions concerning the report, you may attend the D.C.C. meeting. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact the Land Use Planning Office at 438-5591. CITY OF CARLSBAD MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Land Use Planning Manager Land Use Plannung Office MJH:ad Enclosure 1200 ELM AVENUE • slW^ • TELEPHONE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 S^kW^' (619)438-5541 Office of the City Engineer Citp of Cartebab August 29, 1984 Joseph K. Lukoski & Associates 2706 Via Roberto P. O. Box 1733 Carlsbad, CA 92008 PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING - 2910 JEFFERSON STREET This is in response to your letter of August 15, 1984 concerning the subject office building. With respect to Condition No. 1, it is our feeling that the proposed layout is marginal, but that it can be tolerated by the City. We suspect that the minimvun design shown may ultimately be reflected in tenant dis- satisfaction and subsequent inability by the owner to rent space in the building. With respect to Condition No. 2, we feel that the alley, as public property, must be protected from encroachment and inefficient operation. The building should be moved two feet towards Jefferson Street. Very truly yours. RONALD A. BECKMAN City Engineer RAB:cle cc: Walter Brown David Hauser Marty Bouman JOSEPH K. LUKOSKI & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2706 Via Roberto P.O. Box 1733 Carlsbad, CA 92008 TEL (619) 729-4340 August 15, 1984 .Mr. Ronald Beckman, City Engineer City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 R.C.E. 27542 RE: Proposed Office Building 2910 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, California Dr. Mr. Becknian: We would like you to review our project and relive us from two conditions required by your Staff (based on city standards for subdivision design). Condition No. 1. 170 sq. ft. parking space ( 8.5» x 20* ). In the garage structure we are proposing 9*xl9* spaces each 171 sq. ft, with standard columns spacing 27* Cnt. to Cnt. Excluding 14" Dia. columns clear width of spaces are 8.6I* more than 8.5* required. Columns shade 14" wide creates additional comfort for the car door opening. Please note that three spaces surrounded by solid walls would be sufficient according to standards ( 3x8.5**25.5* ). This parking design was originally approved back in 198I. We have complete working drawings, based on 99* and 64' outside building dimensions. Providing 24* aisle and 12" thick cone, block walls, we are left with 19* deep parking space. The longest car built In I98O (see attachments) was the Chrysler New Yorker, 222"x78" « l8.5*x6.5* and the average large car was I8.14'x6.42* . In I98O medium cars averaged I6.2*x5.9' and the small car averaged I4.1*x5.4', they can all be accommodated in your standard compact parking space 17'x8 *. Presently we have 3 (three) compact spaces in the garage (allowable 10), we could call for one compact space between each column, but it would not be our preference. Condition No. 2. Seven parking spaces adjacent to 20' wide alley lacking (perhaps some time in the future) a two foot wide strip of land belonging to the property across the alley for vehicle manuvering. V;e can not secure this 2' strip and we feel it is very unlikely this property will be developed without utilizing alley (wall along prop. line). To ^ 2 3 I i i-^^^^^lt^ -J^FB^so^. STREET : ^ M m RECEIVED UNO USE PUNNING OFFICE -^Hrr. Z S^- 3 ® ST^WDARP CohJVtTfOAJ No, :?3 Aveuue. To CouL^CToR STREET JEFf=ER^OAj STREET 75 T^E .E/^STERCV UwE. OF^ IT^E. ALLEY /^L6KJS "Tne FkowTi KJ6 THE. PROJECT. HTCCBPT "THAT THE. STWE5.T SECTA ONJ SH AU. _ To >\cco»A09/1q^ TTiE ^(5 7/VCY b) je^sr^RSov4 ST^m^T To CoLLesui^.'riDR ST^^SET (aRAMQu ?£. Ttt THE "SOUTHER-LV' Lnsie lii ^^THff- ?R.O0ECT (S<f>vjwPAj^y FCR. ^ f^E-c^r^ EocceprTiAT7HE.STRE.E-r Se^iT^ou SH ALL ^e-As SHOW)M OJO THE SITS. PL^VJ. c) The /^Luer 6i&TtbEE>* HAR.9\IOG STREET CcRMBR Op THE Fk© jBdT» Ti fi^^^p A\«MUE T© FU L L ZO FO O r SHT. 3 -3 C\Ty Rc«lo^t^e^v^e/L>rs Twe DEVELOPER SHAa rAoDipv THE SITE PLAN AS F©LLOUJ5 g) THE Bu»«-p>vtf SHALL Se SETS^cvcFraorys THc: Ac ooKPAfj CE tyrTA^ Ory STAA^PAI^PS '^emPAcr^ /^LL T^RKIAAQ STALLS SHALL HAVB ifitji^A NOT INCLUPEOIMTHE ^EgL»RftD/?«EA. THEAISU U.wij^S-Ch-HeRio«sE'P»RecTEp By THS WILLIAM C. KROMMENHOEK, A.I.A. JOHN M. McKEOWN, A.I.A. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOVVN & ASSOCIATES 1515 MORENA BOULEVARD, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110-3784 TELEPHONE (619) 276-7710 18 JULY 1984 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA. 92008-1989 ATTENTION: CATHERINE NICHOLAS, PROJECT PLANNER SUBJECT: JEFFERSON AND GRAND OFFICE BUILDING RP 84-9 (BESAW) JOB NO.: 83-184 DEAR MS. NICHOLAS: ENCLOSED ARE THE FOLLOWING REVISED DRAWINGS FOR YOUR USE IN REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT: 14 COPIES REVISED SITE PLAN l" = 20' - O" 14 COPIES REVISED FLOOR PLANS 14 COPIES REVISED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1 COPY 8-1/2" X 11" REVISED SITE PLAN 1 COPY 8-1/2" X 11" REVISED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS THE 300 FOOT RADIUS MAP AND VICINITY MAP HAVE NOT CHANGED. ALSO, PER OUR PHONE CONVERSATION OF 16 JULY, WE UNDERSTAND IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO SUBMIT REVISED LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR YOUR REVIEW. LANDSCAPING IN REVISED AREAS OF THE SITE WILL BE COMPARABLE TO THAT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WE HAVE ALREADY SUBMITTED TO YOU. YOU'LL NOTE THAT THE REDUCED AREA OF THE BUILDING PROVIDES FOR MORE LANDSCAPED SPACE. ALSO, THE PARKING PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN VIRTUALLY ELIMINATED. THE PROJECT IS STILL TWO SPACES SHORT OF CITY REQUIREMENTS, HOWEVER. SENIOR ASSOCIATE: JAMES L MEYERHOFF, A.I.A. ASSOCIATES: THOMAS B. AWBREY, A.I.A./ROMAN E. BECK, A.I.A7DALE E. DREXLER/ JON L EBERT/KENNETH E. GREEN, A.I.A.mMOTHY J. RUBESH/ROBERT B. SMITH, A.I.A. CATHERINE NICHOLAS JEFFERSON/GRAND OFFICE BLDG. PAGE TWO PLEASE ADVISE US IF YOU REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WE HOPE THAT THE PROJECT CAN BE REVIEWED AT YOUR 8 AUGUST MEETING. VERY TRULY YOURS, KENNETH GREEN ARCHITECT ENCL . CC: JIM BESAW JACK MC KEOWN FILE KG/SP ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES i Al CHfTcv":TURE A PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES 5i5 MORENA BOULEVARD. SAN OIEGO. CAUIPCRNIA 92110 'ELEPHQNE (619) 276-7710 PROJECT » JHFFE>«5<>^ 4 G\|2AOOO &Bv/\S\OK3f5 PROJECT NO.l g^^jg^ TeleMemo T I ME t \0 « SO TELE. NO. i4-«>5>C^cQ| CD QgSN^O t^€V\gX^^ g^f^D Me^Tlk^Ca^ Pbig, TUL<> ^PV^^gCJT I^IUL^ v:^iKrr OOT i^V \>CKr^iK3-si-^TeiOog^ no T^ f^t^^^T. K v.oife.vrTo:^ OSSNC-^v^ RjES/ifeJ^ M.feHvy3>B^. TUi^ t:^\c::^KX y=*jN<^ufcn> vArssrnK^Gi^ ^U60STa> WILLIAM C. KROMMENHOEK, A.I.A. JOHN M. McKEOWN, A.I.A. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES 1515 MORENA BOULEVARD, SAN OIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92110-3704 TELEPHONE (619) 27&-7710 2 JULY 1984 JAMES BESAW CORNERSTONE MANAGEMENT, INC. SUITE 100 16131 EAST WHITTIE.« BLVD. WHITTIER, CA 90603 SUBJECT! JEFFERSON & GRAND QFFICE BUILDING REVISIONS CARLSBAD, CA JOB NO.i 83184 DEAR MR. BESAWt THE FOLLOWING IS A PROGRESS REPORT GF THE EVENTS WHICH HAVE OCCURRED SINCE 1 JUNE 1984i DAT£ iI£M I JUNE KROMMENHOEK/MC KEOWN AND JOE LUKOSKI MEET TO REVIEW ENGINEERING ITEMS NEEDED FOR THE CITY (SEE MAY 30 MEETING NOTES) 6 JUNE JOE LUKOSKI SUGGESTS NEED FOR REVISIONS TO THE LOBBY AREA TG AID IN RECEIVING CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. 7 JUNE KROMMENHOEK/MC KEOWN SENDS REVISED LOBBY PLANS TG JGE LUKOSKI FOR INCLUSION IN HIS DRAWING. II JUNE REQUEST FOR VACATIONrOF JEFFBRSON ' STREET IS INITIATED tHROUGH^^^^^^ '" YOUR SECRETARY. GEORGIA. KROMMENHOEK/ MC KEOWN DRAWING REVISIONS ARE COMPLETED. COPIES SENT TG YOUR OFFICE. 13 JUNE JOE LUKOSKI AND WILLIAM BILLINGS PURSUE REVISION OF THE EXISTING THREE LOTS INTO ONE TO EXPEDITE VACATION REQUEST. GEORGIA SENDS OFFICIAL REQUEST TO THE CITY. (PROCESSING MAY TAKE TWO MONTHS.) SENIOR ASSOCIATE: JAMES L. MEYERHOFF. A.I.A. ASSOCIATES: ROMAN E. BECK. A.I.A./KENNETH E. GREEN. A.I.A7R0BERT B. SMITH, A.I.A. PAGE 2 JEFFERSON & GRAND OFFICE BUILDING 2 JULY 1984 PATE ITEM 15 JUNE JOE LUKOSKI'S DRAWING IS COMPLETED. PACKAGE IS SUBMITTED TG CATHERINE NICHOLAS. (HE REVIEWS PROJECT WITH ENGINEERING AND RE-DEVELOPMENT DURING WEEK OF 18 JUNE. ) 20 JUNE ORIGINAL OFFICIAL DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION SUBMITTAL FOR DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JULY MEETING. 28 JUNE KROMMENHOEK/MC KEOWN ASSOC. CALL TO CATHERINE NICHOLAS INDICATES - > PROJECT WILL NOT BE PLACED OM^>A^eNDA;^^ UNTIL THE AUGUST 8 MEETING AS PROJECTS HAVE 'BACK UP* IN THE REVIEW PROCESS. KRGMMENHOEK/MC KEOWN CALLS CHRIS SALOMONE TO EXPRESS CONCERN. SALOMONE TG CHECK WITH PLANNING DEPARTMENT. IN ANY CASE, TWO REVIEW BOARD MEETINGS ARE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR JULY. SALOMONE WILL CALL KROMMENHOEK/MC KEOWN WITH RESULTS. THE PLANNING AND_ ENGINEERING DEPARTMBNTS ARE STItl:^-/ NOT HAPPY WITH THE PROJECT AND ' ^ DO NOT INTEND f0-^MPPORT IT. MAJOR ' OBJECTIONS ARE STILL BASED UPON LACK OF STANDARD PARKING, JHE DENSITY^ GF THE PROJBCT ON THE SITE, AND ' ' THE LOW PERCENTAGE GF LANDSCAPING, ^ MS. NICHOLAS HAS ACKNOWLEDGED OUR " WILLINGNESS TG INCLUDE ALL GF THEIR SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN GUR REVISIONS. BUT SHE WILL NOT RECOMMEND APPROVAL GF THE PROJECT. MR. SALOMONE IS HAPPY WITH THE PROJECT AND WILL SUPPORT IT. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES PAGE 3 JEFFERSON & GRAND OFFICE BUILDING 2 JULY 1984 IN OUR DISCUSSIONS WITH MR. LUKOSKI HE HAS SUGGESTED THAT YOU MAY WISH TO RETAIN ONE OF THB ATTORNEYS WHO ARE EXPERIENCED IN PRESENTATTdNS TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. SUCH A PERSON MAY BE FAMILIAR WITH THE BOARD MEMBERS AND THEIR PERSONALITIES AND SHOULD BE ABLE TO SELECT THE BEST APPROACH FOR PRESENTATION OF YOUR CASE. WE HAVE ASKED MR. LUKOSKI TO PROVIDE YOU WITH THEIR NAMES FOR CONSIDERATION. IF SCHEDULING PROBLEMS ARE NOT RESOLVED. YOU MAY WISH TO TALK DIRECTLY TO FRANK ALSHIRE. THE CITY MANAGER^AS WE'VE DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY. WE LOOK FORWARD TO TALKING TO YOU UPON YOUR RETURN. HOPEFULLY, MR. SALOMONE WILL SCHEDULE THE REVIEW FOR JULY. VERY TRULY YOURS, KENNETH GREEN KG/NC CC: JACK NC KEOWN CHARLES ROWE JGE LUKOSKI ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES At^CHlTECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOOATES .^15 MCRENA BCULEVARD. SAN DIE'-.n. CALIFORNIA 9 2 110 PLEPHONE <619) 276-7^10 TeleMemo ..' I TH : OCTHeeiKiC NtOiOLAS DATE. 2e>0iUKit 64- PROJECT NO., g^^g^ TIME: 10:2>0 TELE. N0.,435-5S^l ^. ^Vfe TUftT -SUE F^T TMAT MAX>& ^ HKi^V lHf»«0V6HDJrS TU<^T TUe Fir^i^t^ecT L^«p\ teg AjpPf^QV^O. TtAi^ l^b oug> Tb TUe roAJC^g^y^€. pyvieiciAK^Q Avj>oo TUe t>BK^iT\ c>F TUe Fyer>O^Eor T»Ae -sire,- . ; 3. X McrPEQ THKT THg TOO :aP/kCjg:b 0>^ A&FFO'^Sgn^ Cx>OUD feWbx-AT^eo To -ST/u^)f^<^.Q TUe ^FA^ ^C4e^^ Ra^^A TV^e VT/^iy^ THE G^Ayggt^Cag CoouQ >=5e Oe^K^^^Asnrg^vo C^I^PACT IF TUl-S VOOV^VJO M&VJP. FeCT TH»^ THV^S UVaOUO TSC V^fAQt3TF6l»^T> U^\/6 TQ \Mp>^vH; Tu€ t^eo^eoT, IkybT^^o <3F TV\S ^\Ou>t {{ h\g^i»o><k, > t>scx)»^«ev3T^ ov^T\u i0PTt£?ye. THi-*» WLWiBui >ba^o OFo>4 wwrT«»^ "V^i^ormmo, COPY TO. Flue BY: (^K^^ C^j^^K^ AR(^HITECTURE A PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES 1515 MORENA BOULEVARD. SAW OIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92110 TELEPHONE (619) 276-7710 PROJECT. ,^r€y2'^^ Cl(llJ^^^JSA%l<>ti& PROJECT NO.. TeleMemo V.' I TH I DATE. ^^K^e^ TIMEi "Z'OO TELE. NO.l igexugjvJiOCb r)e:si<->0 ige\/\gu fec^^^^if^o te.^gu>> (jlog,osT. Mg U3to »ocrT AM^Ajrzg (OF" TUgr f^re^usH t^^tP TSi^PO THfj^T FVgcxS&cT x^i^T:^ T'o -fee rc ig:>o>cr, : COPY TO. F\UE, WILLIAM C. KROMMENHOEK, A.I.A. JOHN M. McKEOWN, A.I.A. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES 1515 MORENA BOULEVARD. SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110-3784 TELEPHONE (619) 276-7710 15 JUNE 1984 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD. CA. 92008-1989 ATTENTION: CATHERINE NICHOLAS. PROJECT PLANNER SUBJECT. JEFFERSON AND GRAND OFFICE BUILDING RP 84-9 (BESAW) JOB NO.. 83-184 DEAR MS. NICHOLAS: ENCLOSED ARE THE FOLLOWING REVISED DRAWINGS FOR YOUR USE IN REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT. 14 COPIES REVISED SITE PLAN 1" = 20'- O" 14 COPIES 300 FOOT RADIUS MAP AND VICINITY MAP 14 COPIES REVISED FLOOR PLANS 14 COPIES REVISED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1 COPY 8-1/2" X 11" REVISED SITE PLAN 1 COPY 8-1/2" X 11" REVISED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS WE HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO PROVIDE THE COMPLETE INFORMATION WHICH YOU HAVE REQUESTED AND TO ADDRESS THE ITEMS OF CONCERN THAT WE DISCUSSED IN OUR MEETING OF 30 MAY. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LOBBY AND ENTRY AREA HAVE BEEN REVISED TG ALLOW BETTER TRAFFIC SIGHT LINES AT THE JEFFERSON/GRAND INTERSECTION. THIS ALSO ALLOWS MORE LANDSCAPING SPACE AT THE SIDEWALK LEVEL AND REDUCES THE ENCROACHMENT OF THE ENTRY RAMP GN THE JEFFERSON STREET RIGHT OF WAY. A REQUEST FOR VACATION OF THIS AREA HAS BEEN INITIATED. THE REVISED SITE PLAN SHOWS THE FACILITIES AND PHYSICAL FEATURES REQUIRED FOR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REVIEW. THE TRASH ENCLOSURE HAS BEEN LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING. SENIOR ASSOCIATE: JAMES L MEYERHOFF. A.I.A. ASSOCIATES: THOMAS B. AWBREY, A.I.AJROMAN E. BECK, A.I.AiDALE E. DREXLER/ JON L EBERT/KENNETH E. GREEN, A.I.A./TIMOTHY J. RUBESH/ROBERT B. SMITH, A.I.A. JEFFERSON/GRAND PAGE TWO AS DISCUSSED IN OUR MEETING, THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPING HAS BEEN AUGMENTED BY PROVISIONS FOR EXTERIOR PLANTING GN THE FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS AT THE MAIN LOBBIES. THE INCLUSION OF BALCONIES ON THE EAST SIDE SHOULD ALSO ENCOURAGE THE USE OF POTTED PLANTS. THE REVISED PLANS SHOW THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF TWO EXISTING PALMS FROM JEFFERSON STREET TO GRAND AVE., AND THE EXISTING EUCALYPTUS TREE TO REMAIN AND BE TRIMMED, AS REQUESTED. ALTHOUGH NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. IF NECESSARY, THE TWO COMPACT PARK- ING SPACES AT JEFFERSON STREET CAN BE PAVED WI'VH " GRASS- CRETE" TG HELP SOFTEN THE AREA, AND INCREASE THE EXPANSE OF LAWN AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER GF THE SITE. A CATALOG CUT IS ENCLOSED. PARKING FACILITIES REMAIN THE MOST SERIOUS CONCERN. AS WE HAVE DISCUSSED, THE FACT THAT THIS DESIGN IS BASED UPON RE- VISIONS TO A PROJECT WHICH WAS APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION IN 1981 PLACES CONSTRAINTS GN THE SITE WHICH DG NOT LEND THEM- SELVES TO A COMPLETE RESOLUTION OF THE PARKING ISSUE. IN SPITE OF THIS. WE HAVE PURSUED THE PROJECT UPON THE ENCOURAGE- MENT OF THE CARLSBAD REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT, WHERE POSSIBLE, THE COMPACT PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN INCREASED IN SIZE. THE SPACES DO MEET OR EXCEED MINIMUM SIZES ACCEPTED BY OTHER JURISTICTIONS, AND IT IS THE INTENT TO ASSIGN THE SMALLER SPACES TO BUILDING TENANTS. TG INCREASE BACKING VISION AT THE TWO SPACES AT JEFFERSON STREET, WE SUGGEST THE INSTALLATION OF A CONVEX TRAFFIC MIRROR. IF STRUCTURALLY FEASIBLE, THE GARAGE ACCESS OPENING WILL BE WIDENED. OR AN ADDITIONAL WINDOW OPENING WILL BE ADDED AT THIS LOCATION. PLEASE ADVISE US IF YOU REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. WE HOPE THAT THE PROJECT CAN BE REVIEWED AT YOUR 11 JULY MEETING. VERY TRULY YOURS, KENNETH GREEN ARCHITECT ENCL . CC. JIM BESAW JACK MC KEOWN FILE KG/SP ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES WILLIAM C. KROMMENHOEK, A.I.A. JOHN M. McKEOWN, A.I.A. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES 1515 MORENA BOULEVARD, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110-3784 TELEPHONE (619) 276-7710 15 JUNE 1984 CITY OF CARLSBAD LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD. CA. 92008-1989 ATTENTION: CATHERINE NICHOLAS, PROJECT PLANNER SUBJECT: JEFFERSON AND GRAND OFFICE BUILDING RP 84-9 (BESAW) JOB NO.: 83-184 DEAR MS. NICHOLAS: ENCLOSED ARE THE FOLLOWING REVISED DRAWINGS FOR YOUR USE IN REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT: 14 COPIES REVISED SITE PLAN l" = 20'- O" 14 COPIES 300 FOOT RADIUS MAP AND VICINITY MAP 14 COPIES REVISED FLOOR PLANS 14 COPIES REVISED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1 COPY 8-1/2" X 11" REVISED SITE PLAN 1 COPY 8-1/2" X 11" REVISED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS WE HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO PROVIDE THE COMPLETE INFORMATION WHICH YOU HAVE REQUESTED AND TO ADDRESS THE ITEMS OF CONCERN THAT WE DISCUSSED IN OUR MEETING OF 30 MAY. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LOBBY AND ENTRY AREA HAVE BEEN REVISED TO ALLOW BETTER TRAFFIC SIGHT LINES AT THE JEFFERSON/GRAND INTERSECTION. THIS ALSO ALLOWS MORE LANDSCAPING SPACE AT THE SIDEWALK LEVEL AND REDUCES THE ENCROACHMENT OF THE ENTRY RAMP ON THE JEFFERSON STREET RIGHT OF WAY. A REQUEST FOR VACATION OF THIS AREA HAS BEEN INITIATED. THE REVISED SITE PLAN SHOWS THE FACILITIES AND PHYSICAL FEATURES REQUIRED FOR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REVIEW. THE TRASH ENCLOSURE HAS BEEN LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING. SENIOR ASSOCIATE: JAMES L MEYERHOFF, A.l.A. ASSOCIATES: THOMAS B. AWBREY, A.I.A./ROMAN E. BECK, A.I.A7DALE E. DREXLER/ JON L EBERT/KENNETH E. GREEN, A.I.A./TIMOTHY J. RUBESH/ROBERT B. SMITH, A.I.A. JEFFERSON/GRAND PAGE TWO AS DISCUSSED IN OUR MEETING. THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPING HAS BEEN AUGMENTED BY PROVISIONS FOR EXTERIOR PLANTING ON THE FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS AT THE MAIN LOBBIES. THE INCLUSION OF BALCONIES ON THE EAST SIDE SHOULD ALSO ENCOURAGE THE USE OF POTTED PLANTS. THE REVISED PLANS SHOW THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF TWO EXISTING PALMS FROM JEFFERSON STREET TO GRAND AVE., AND THE EXISTING EUCALYPTUS TREE TO REMAIN AND BE TRIMMED, AS REQUESTED. ALTHOUGH NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, IF NECESSARY, THE TWO COMPACT PARK- ING SPACES AT JEFFERSON STREET CAN BE PAVED WITH " GRASS- CRETE" TO HELP SOFTEN THE AREA, AND INCREASE THE EXPANSE OF LAWN AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE. A CATALOG CUT IS ENCLOSED. PARKING FACILITIES REMAIN THE MOST SERIOUS CONCERN. AS WE HAVE DISCUSSED, THE FACT THAT THIS DESIGN IS BASED UPON RE- VISIONS TO A PROJECT WHICH WAS APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION IN 1981 PLACES CONSTRAINTS ON THE SITE WHICH DO NOT LEND THEM- SELVES TO A COMPLETE RESOLUTION OF THE PARKING ISSUE. IN SPITE OF THIS, WE HAVE PURSUED THE PROJECT UPON THE ENCOURAGE- MENT OF THE CARLSBAD REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT, WHERE POSSIBLE, THE COMPACT PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN INCREASED IN SIZE. THE SPACES DO MEET OR EXCEED MINIMUM SIZES ACCEPTED BY OTHER JURISTICTIONS, AND IT IS THE INTENT TO ASSIGN THE SMALLER SPACES TO BUILDING TENANTS. TO INCREASE BACKING VISION AT THE TWO SPACES AT JEFFERSON STREET, WE SUGGEST THE INSTALLATION OF A CONVEX TRAFFIC MIRROR. IF STRUCTURALLY FEASIBLE, THE GARAGE ACCESS OPENING WILL BE WIDENED, OR AN ADDITIONAL WINDOW OPENING WILL BE ADDED AT THIS LOCATION. PLEASE ADVISE US IF YOU REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. WE HOPE THAT THE PROJECT CAN BE REVIEWED AT YOUR 11 JULY MEETING. VERY TRULY YOURS, KENNETH GREEN ARCHITECT ENCL. CC: JIM BESAW JACK MC KEOWN FILE KG/SP ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES RCHITECTURE A PLANNING CROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES 515 MORENA BOULEVARD. SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92110 ILEPHONE (619) 276-7710 ROJECT: sisFF^r^^O^ ^ G\fZ^^ ReVlSVOv^ ROJECT NO.: e>'5\M TeleMemo OF. DATE. \3Ooo6 e>4 TIME: -4-SO TELE. NO . t 7Z^ • 4l>40 r>^L^>K^G^ Ao^O t43y:^OLL^r -^OI^VT T^E ^^>JlT><a^ B^iZJP^C^e. T^ TU^ FV^o^^cT fe^ fi>^i^^e/^'TEO. COPY TWJ3^^V2A»'=< REVISIONS TO JEFFERSON/GRAND OFFICE BUILDING <»83184 NOTES FROM MEETING HELD 30 MAY 1984 PRESENT: CATHERINE NICHOLAS - CARLSBAD LAND USE PLANNING DEPT WALTER BROWN - CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPT. KEN GREEN - KROMMENHOEK/MC KEOWN 6 ASSOC. |TEM$ p?$CU??^p. MR. BROWN PRESENTED A CHECK LIST FROM THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WHICH OUTLINED ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED ON THE SITE PLAN (1:20 SCALE PREFERRED) BEFORE IT WILL BE RE- VIEWED, ITEMS ARE AS FOLLOWS: A. ADD NAWES AND ADDRESSES OF OWNER AND DEVELOPER • DIRECTLY TO SITE PLAN. B. SHOW LOCATION OF FACILITIES AND PHYSICAL FEATURES, LABELED "EXISTING" AND "PROPOSED", THAT ARE WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE PROJECT OR ON THE PROJECT SITE * | THIS INCLUDES DRIVEWAYS l<ND ALLEYS, STREET INTER- SECTIONS, CURBS AND GUTTERS. SIDEWALKS, ROADWAY f POSITIONS .AND NAMES, ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS. MEDIAN ISLANDS, BUILDINGS. UTILITY FACILTTIES (INCtUDJNd THOSE UNDERGROUND), EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS, DRAINAGE- FACILITIES, WATER COURSES. TRAFFIC CONTROL FACILITIES, OTHER IMPROVEMENTS. ON THE SI Tjg ONLY. SHOW MAJOR VEGETATION WITH SIZE: AND TYPE.•FREf" STANDING SIGNS, PARKING STALLS WITH ACCURATE DIMENSIONS, AND LANDSCAPING. ALSO. SHOW LOCATION AND USES GF EASEMENTS AND QUANTITIES OF SOIL IMPORT, EXPORT, AND TOTAL OUANTITY MOVED IN CUBIC YARDS. A REQUEST FOR VACATION OF JEFFERSON STREET WILL BE NEEDED AS THE RAMP AND STEPS TO THE ENTRY ARE OUTSIDE THE PRO- PERTY LINE. SHOW LOCATION OF TRASH STORAGE. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES JEFFERSON/GRAND REVISIONS PAGE TWO 4. MS. NICHOLAS NOTED THAT HER REPORT COULD NOT RECOMMEND ^ APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT UNLESS SHE WAS SATISFIED WITH THE PARKING. CURRENTLY THE PROJECT HAS TWO SPACES LESS THAN THE NUMBER REQUIRED. THE TWO COMPACT SPACES GN THE JEFFERSON STREET SIDE OF THE BUILDING ARE NOT DESIRABLE AS THEY REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPED AREA AND DO NOT ALLOW GOOD SITE LINES FOR BACKING OUT, THE SPACE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE GARAGE IS TIGHT AND WILL BE DIFFICULT TO USE, DUE TO THE STAIR LOCATION. IN GENERAL, SPACES ARE SLIGHTLY SMALLER THAN CITY STANDARDS, ALTHOUGH THIS PROBLEM IS NOT MAJOR. DENSITY OF BUILDING MASS ./ COMPARED TO THE SITE IS ALSO A CONCERN. MORE GF THE SITE SHOULD BE DEDICATED TO LANDSCAPING. 5. FEW, IF ANY OF THE ITEMS REQUIRED FOR THE SITE PLAN WILL BE AVAILABLE FROM THE CITY, BUT KRGMMENHOEK/MC KEOWN 6 ASSOCIATES IS WELCOME TO RESEARCH THE FILES. A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUCH AS THIS GNE WAS NOT REQUIRED IN 1980-81. WHEN THE BUILDING WAS FIRST DESIGNED. TO BE REVIEWED AT THE JULY 11 MEETING, ALL ITEMS WILL NEED TO BE COMPLETE BY JUNE 13 (FOUR WEEKS BEFORE THE MEETING). THE LAND USE PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAKES A SEP- ARATE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON THE ACCEPTABILITY OF THE PROJECT. ITS REPORT INCLUDES INPUT FROM THE ENGINEERING DEPT., THE BUILDING DEPT., PARKS AND RECREATION, AND THE FIRE PREVENTION DEPT. THE REDEVELOPMENT MANAGER WILL MAKE HIS^OWN RECOMMENDATION. PARKS DEPT. HAS EXPRESSED INTEREST IN RETAINING THE EXISTING EUCALYPTUS AND PALMS. SUBMITTED BY: KEN GREEN ^ CC: ALL ATTENDEES JIM BESAW JACK MC KEOWN FILE KG/SP ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES Co/tneft8tone (Management ^^HC. SUITE 100 16131 EAST WHITTIER BOULEVARD WHITTIER. CALIFORNIA 90603 714/526-8281 June 8, 1984 Mr. Ronald Beckman, City Engineer City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, Calfiornia 92008 RE: Proposed Office Building Site 2910 Jefferson Street Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Beckman: We would like to request a vacation of portions of Jefferson Street Parkway in excess of 10 feet measured from existing curbline. This reraaining portion, approximately 6 foot wide strip, will give us adequate space for required handicap ramp access, bike rack and additional landscaping. The propsed office building per se will not encroach into this area. Enclosed herewith is a check in the amount of $400.00 for the filing fee along with the plot plan and legal description (title policy). Your prompt attention to this matter will be appreciated. Sincerely, Georgia W. Barksdale Secretary to James A. Besaw /gb enclosures -2- Our 22' deep parking spaces plus 20' alley are more than sufficient for large car ingress and egress to and -from the proposed parking (see attachments). V.'e can move proposed building, two r.iore feet towards the Je.^'^ Street, but \:e feel 2' strip of landscaping in the office building v;ill be more beneficial to Downtown Redevelopment Area. Ierson front of Carlsbad Please advise us if you require any additional information. We are attaching current standards for parking space sizes used by the City of San Diego and the City of Escondido. Verv truly yours oseph K. Lukoskij P.E. End. cc: Jim Besaw Jack xMc Keown Pile WOODSIDE/KUBOTA & ASSOCIATES, INC. • NOINKBRS 2565 Pio Pico Drive. P.O. Box 1095. Carlsbad, California 92008. (619) 729-1194 June 1, 1984 Land Use Planning Office City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attenti on Cat Subject: Gentlemen RP 84-9 Costa Real Besa>»^ Municipal Water District The subject development project has been reviewed by the Costa Real Municipal Water District to determine if there will be any transmission facilities necessary to be constructed as a direct result of the proposed development project. Additionally, the evaluation has included the necessity for any relocation of existing transmission facilities. We have determined that there are no transmission facilities involved so that the City of Carlsbad will be responsible for the design, construction and inspection of the water system facilities within the subject development project in accordance with the applicable standard plans and specifications. We do recommend that the entire commercial complex be carefully evaluated to determine the total water service requirements to insure an adequately sized water service and meter installation. Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions regarding this project. Very truly yours Kubota, Di'sTt, a 1 Municipal Ct Engineer Water District cc: Mr. Kurt Musser, Costa Real Municipal Water District FJW:JYK:paf CMWD 83-108 In Orange County, Santa Ana REVISIONS TO JEFFERSON/GRAND OFFICE BUILDING #83184 NOTES FROM MEETING HELD 30 MAY 1984 PRESENT: CATHERINE NICHOLAS - CARLSBAD LAND USE PLANNING DEPT WALTER BROWN - CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPT. KEN GREEN - KROMMENHOEK/MC KEOWN & ASSOC. ITEMS DISCUSSED: 1. MR. BROWN PRESENTED A CHECK LIST FROM THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WHICH OUTLINED ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED ON THE SITE PLAN (1:20 SCALE PREFERRED) BEFORE IT WILL BE RE- VIEWED. ITEMS ARE AS FOLLOWS: ADD NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF OWNER AND DEVELOPER DIRECTLY TO SITE PLAN. SHOW LOCATION OF FACILITIES AND PHYSICAL FEATURES, LABELED "EXISTING" AND "PROPOSED", THAT ARE WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE PROJECT OR ON THE PROJECT SITE. THIS INCLUDES DRIVEWAYS AND ALLEYS, STREET INTER- SECTIONS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, ROADWAY POSITIONS .AND NAMES, ROADWAY CROSS-SECT IONS, MEDIAN ISLANDS, BUILDINGS, UTILITY FACILITIES (INCLUDING THOSE UNDERGROUND), EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS, DRAINAGE FACILITIES, WATER COURSES, TRAFFIC CONTROL FACILITIES, OTHER IMPROVEMENTS. ON THE SITE ONLY, SHOW MAJOR VEGETATION WITH SIZE AND TYPE, FREE STANDING SIGNS, PARKING STALLS WITH ACCURATE DIMENSIONS, AND LANDSCAPING. ALSO, SHOW LOCATION AND USES OF EASEMENTS AND QUANTITIES OF SOIL IMPORT, EXPORT, AND TOTAL QUANTITY MOVED IN CUBIC YARDS. 2. A REQUEST FOR VACATION OF JEFFERSON STREET WILL BE NEEDED AS THE RAMP AND STEPS TO THE ENTRY ARE OUTSIDE THE PRO- PERTY LINE. 3. SHOW LOCATION OF TRASH STORAGE. ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES JEFFERSON/GRAND REVISIONS PAGE TWO 4. MS. NICHOLAS NOTED THAT HER REPORT COULD NOT RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT UNLESS SHE WAS SATISFIED WITH THE PARKING. CURRENTLY THE PROJECT HAS TWO SPACES LESS THAN THE NUMBER REQUIRED. THE TWO COMPACT SPACES ON THE JEFFERSON STREET SIDE OF THE BUILDING ARE NOT DESIRABLE AS THEY REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPED AREA AND DO NOT ALLOW GOOD SITE LINES FOR BACKING OUT. THE SPACE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE GARAGE IS TIGHT AND WILL BE DIFFICULT TO USE, DUE TO THE STAIR LOCATION. IN GENERAL, SPACES ARE SLIGHTLY SMALLER THAN CITY STANDARDS, ALTHOUGH THIS PROBLEM IS NOT MAJOR. DENSITY OF BUILDING MASS COMPARED TO THE SITE IS ALSO A CONCERN. MORE OF THE SITE SHOULD BE DEDICATED TO LANDSCAPING. 5. FEW, IF ANY OF THE ITEMS REQUIRED FOR THE SITE PLAN WILL BE AVAILABLE FROM THE CITY, BUT KROMMENHOEK/MC KEOWN & ASSOCIATES IS WELCOME TO RESEARCH THE FILES. A MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT SUCH AS THIS ONE WAS NOT REQUIRED IN 1980-81, WHEN THE BUILDING WAS FIRST DESIGNED. 6. TO BE REVIEWED AT THE JULY 11 MEETING, ALL ITEMS WILL NEED TO BE COMPLETE BY JUNE 13 (FOUR WEEKS BEFORE THE MEETING). THE LAND USE PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAKES A SEP- ARATE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON THE ACCEPTABILITY OF THE PROJECT. ITS REPORT INCLUDES INPUT FROM THE ENGINEERING DEPT., THE BUILDING DEPT., PARKS AND RECREATION, AND THE FIRE PREVENTION DEPT. THE REDEVELOPMENT MANAGER WILL MAKE HIS OWN RECOMMENDATION. 7. PARKS DEPT. HAS EXPRESSED INTEREST IN RETAINING THE EXISTING EUCALYPTUS AND PALMS. SUBMITTED BY: KEN GREEN ^ CC: ALL ATTENDEES JIM BESAW JACK MC KEOWN FILE KG/SP ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES APCHITECTURE & PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES VOOF'vA BOol EvARD SAN 2'EG - 'ELEP'-'ONE r 'f^ IC = POJECT NO.: g^^^g^^ TeleMemo 0^ •» OTX OF CAl^u^6AJ:> DATE: 2^ MA^ 64 TIME: irSO TELE. N0.t4l&'B&\\ G) H/^v^re- l^eoe^ ^c.y;ve^ FoO>^^P ' — !• ikOFKioi^T n^^-S^'' Rr^ ^<Ce..OV^^',rOC^ TC> CJ^H^/^AKOe »O^JE, • . THIS ^O^-^ pc»s^^ -SH<3\ruo Du-sco'S'S gxret^T Tm-^ v\e.cTiky;^ A:b IT T^OAEICX. X v^ic^ cj^s.. T<b •A.ergA^^ Tl>-Ae. COPY TO r^»-vSF^i>jC^ -LOPMENTAL » ^ 1200 ELM AVENUE SERVICES H^S^B CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-1989 .WD aS£ PLANNING OFFICE ^^ilTjm 438-5591 Citp of Carlgbab May 23, 1984 James A. Besaw 16131 Whittier Blvd. Whittier, CA 90603 RE: RP 84-9 (BESAW) The Director of Building and Planning, the City Engineer and the Land Use Planning Manager have reviewed the application you submitted for th^ above-referenced project. Based upon this review, it has been determined that there are major problems associated with your application which must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a Planning Commission hearing. The problems or issues are listed below. Also, the name of the project planner and project engineer is provided. You should set-up a meeting to discuss the issues with the appropriate staff member. Once the problems/issues have been addressed, your application will then be scheduled for a hearing. Problems/Issues Project Planner 1 ) Inadequate site plan CATHERINE NICHOLAS 2) Insufficient engineering data Project Engineer on plan. WALTER BROWN Review and Comment Memo MEMORANDUM DATE TO: Engineering Department Fire Department Building Departraent Parks and Recreation Department HAY 1984 ktCEiVED LANDUSE PLANNING OFFICE PROM: Land Use Planning Office SUBJECT: Reauest for Review and Comment on Application Proposal: C€>U.9>-\r^oc:H:ioA 0^" ^ Sk-'S>-t-t=«.y <:^jg=^=Viu^ i;2^^L.c^LpUy Project Planner:__J|^^T1 This item has been tentatively scheduled for the Planning Commission meeting of . Please review and submit written comments and/or conditions to the Land Use Planning Office by \ I ^ trW . If not received by that date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the proposal has your endorsement as submitted. Thank you. Comment I recommend that the architect, through design, conceal the heating and AC units whether they are on the roof or elsewhere. EMlLE PLUDE Sr. Building Inspector ATTACHMENTS DATE: TO • ^ Planning Department Engineering Department FROM: Fire Department CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT // o • v:5 STANDARD CONDITIONS 5? 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. @ 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. Additional public and/or on site fire hydrants shall be provided if deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal. The applicant shall submit two (2) copies of a site plan showing locations of existing and proposed fire hydrants and on site roads and drives to the Fire Marshal for approval. An all weather access road shall be maintained throughout construction. All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operational prior to combustible building materials being located on the project site. Proposed security gate systems shall be provided with "Knox" key operated override switch, as specified by the Fire Department. All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall have posted "No Parking/Fire Lane-Tow Away Zone" pursuant to Section 17.04.040, Carlsbad Municipal Code. Fire retardant roofs shall be required on all structures. Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications contained in the City of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual. All fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing systems, automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction. All roof-top appurtenances shall be architecturally integrated into the design of the building and shielding to prevent noise and visual impacts, subject to approval before issuance of permit. Building exceeding 10,000 sq. ft. aggregate floor area shall be sprinklered or have four-hour fire walls with no openings therein which shall split the building into 10,000 sq. ft. (or less) areas. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS/COMMENTS DATE: TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, DEVELOPMENT DIVISION WALTER, b Row SUBJECT: INITIAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF 64-**^ Attached, are Initial Review and Assessment Sheets for subject project. The documents submitted for this project are: Complete and suitable for continued review. Incomplete. The Developer should be advised to submit the Items marked In the "Non-Accept" and "Not Addressed" columns. Further processing will not proceed until all required data Is received. The documents have been reviewed to establish an Initial assess- ment of the project. The review Indicates: Insufficient data has been provided to make determinations of significance. The project should not receive a negative declaration or be scheduled for hearing until additional data is received. Please contact me. "Mild" to "Normal" concern. The Engineering submittal of comments and/or requested. Department conditions anticlpates by the date "Severe" concerns. The project should not receive a negative declaration or be scheduled for hearing until the Items Indicated "Severe" are resolved. This project Is otherwise a candidate for denial. Please contact me. CITY OF CARLSBAO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS PROJECT IDENTIf ICATION: RP 9 PROJECT NAME: B B S AW PROJECT LOCATION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: STGRY OFFtCE. ENGINEER: U)ft\^nrgR. ^0\JUKJ ASSIGNED PLANNER: CATNER^IMg^ MtCHQC^S INITIAL CHECKLIST RECEIVED FROM: Fu^jsjl^! REVIEWED BY: U)VSR^QUJM DATE:5" DATE FORWARD TO: DATE •Ml, fii FIRST SUBMinAL SECOND SUBMITTAL PLAN QUALITY 1. Name and address of the Owner whose property Is proposed to be developed. 2. Name and address of the Developer. 3. Name, address, and registration number of the Architect or Registered Civil Engineer who is in responsible charge of the project. 4. North point and scale of the plans. 5. Date of preparation and revision of the plan. 6. The street address(es) and Assessor's Parcel Number(s) of the lot(s) proposed to be developed. 7. Location of the following facilities and physical features, labeled "existing" or "proposed", that are within 100 feet of theproject: A t^Ai^At*** A. Driveways and Alleys /lOJnCEM T B. Street Intersections P^^^fijRLfi^ * C. Curb and Gutter \ii ^ i^s^' D. Sidewalks W\TH\N I OO E. Roadway Position and Name KliK4r» AUJM F. Roadway Cross-Sect ion I^OT G. Median Islands . ^ H. Buildings I. Utility Facilities J. Existing Contours] K. Proposed Contours] 1* Intervals for slopes less than 5X, 2' Intervals for slopes between 556 and lOX, and 5' intervals for |slopes over 10%.] L. Drainage Facilities M. Water Courses N. Traffic Control Facilities 0. Other Improvements (Swimming Pools, Retaining WalIs,Etc 8. The location of the following facilities and physical fea tures, labeled "existing" or "proposed" on the project site; A. Items enumerated In Item 7, above B. Major vegatation with size and type C. Free-standing signs. D. Parking stalls and facilities E. Landscaping 9. Locatlons(s) and use(s) of easements 10. Quantities of soil Import, export, and total quantity moved, in cubic yards. 11. A Vicinity Map LlIT ur LIIKL5BIIU ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS PROJECT IDENTIFICATION: fl^ ^ 9 PROJECT NAME: INITIAL ASSESSMENT llnsuffT-l NO. 2. 3. 5. ITEM LAND TITLE: A. Existing Easements B. Required Easements C. Project Access 0. Access to Public Resources TRAFFIC: A. Count B. Street Capacity C. Intersection Capacity D. Generation By Project E. Sight Distance F. Accident History G. Control Devices H. Confonnance with General Plan I. Intersection Distance J. Street Width K. Horizontal Curves POTABLE WATER: A. Project Distribution Adequacy B. Fire Protection C. Conformance with General Plan SANITARY SEWER: A. Treatment Facility Adequacy B. Trunk System Adequacy C. Project Systenr>\dequacy D. Pump Station Rquirements E. Other Disposal Methods F. Confonnance with General Plan GEOLOGY: A. Hazards B. Slopes C. Grading D. Cut/Fill Balance E. Erosion Control F. Siltation G. Soils Report STORM WATER: A. On-Site Facility Adequacy 8. Off-Site Facility Adequacy C. Proposed Discharge Type D. Discharge Quality E. Discharge Treatment F. Master Drainage Plan CONSTRUCTION CONTROL: A. Project Phasing 8. Project Scheduling C. Off-Site Haulage D. Project Access (during construction) E. Materials Stockpiling SITE AMENITIES: A. Street Trees B. Irrigation Water C. Park Site (as it relates to Eng'r) D. School Site F. Street Lighting ent Data Mild 1 Normal | Severe 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MMMte 1 1 "^v^^l 1 1 1 1 1 mmmmm ''"""""IP 1 ^•••^ rmm, i^^mmm \mmmmm» )fmmmm 1 [^••^ 1 /\pjftcE>i T TOPO SL CouruR/^u PcofKLY May 9, 1984 TO: REDEVELOPMENT MANAGER From: Parks Superintendent TREES AT JEFFERSON AND GRAND I have reviewed the situation of the existing trees at the vacant lot on Jefferson and Grand. My recommendation is as follows: 1. Save the existing Palms but have them trimmed up including the trunks. 2. Leave the existing Eucalyptus, work around as possible - City staff will prune the tree. 3. Remove the California Pepper at the North-Eastern portion of the property. Thank you for v/our consideration in this manner. DOUG tJUNCANSON DD/smg c: Mark Steyaert WILL/AM C. KROMMENHOEK, A.(.A. JOHN M. McKEOWN. A.I.A. ARCHITECTURE A PLANNING KROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES 1515 MORENA SOULEVAPO. SAN OEGO. CAUFOHNIA 82110-3784 TELFPHONE (619) 276-7 710 20 APRIL 1984 JAMES BESAW CORNERSTONE MANAGEMENT, INC. SUITE 100 16131 EAST WHITTIER BLVD. WHITTIER, CA. 90603 SUBJECT! JEFFERSON 6 GRAND OFFICE BUILDING REVISIONS CARLSBAD, CA. JOB NO.i 83-184 DEAR MR. BESAWi THE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE OF THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN COMPLETED, AND ITEMS REQUIRED FOR THE MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD NEXT WEEK. PLEASE RETURN THE SIGNED APPLICATION FORMS TO US FOR INCLUSION IN THE SUBMITTAL. COPIES OF THE SITE PLAN, FLOOR PLANS, AND ELEVATIONS WILL BE SENT TO YOU FOR APPROVAL AT THAT TIME. THE SCHEDULE FOR CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT REVISIONS IS BASED UPON THE SUBMISSION AND FIRST REVIEW APPROVAL OF THE MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION. AS NOTED IN TONY OYESHIKU'S MEMO OF 11 APRIL 1984, THE CITY REPRESENTATIVE HAD ADVISED US NOT TO PROCEED INTO WORKING DRAWINGS UNTIL WE HEAR FROM THE FIRST REVIEW BOARD (APPROXIMATELY TWO WEEKS). ASSUMING SUB- MITTAL OF THE APPLICATION ON 23 APRIL, THE SCHEDULE FOR CON- STRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS AS FOLLOWSi 23 APRIL ~ SUBMIT MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION. (COPY TO YOU FOR APPROVAL) 7 MAY - RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM FIRST REVIEW BOARD. START REVISION OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 4 JUNE - SUBMIT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR CITY PLAN CHECK. 11 JUNE - RECEIVE APPROVAL OF MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT FROM SECOND REVIEW BOARD. 18 JUNE - RECEIVE PLAN CHECK COMMENTS. SENIOR ASSOCIATE: JAMES L MEYERHOFF, A.I.A. ASSOCIATES. THOMAS B. AWBREY. A.I>yROMAN E. BECK. A.I.A70ALE E. DREXLEW JON L EBERT/KENNETH E. GREEN. A.I.A/r)MOTHY J. RUBESH/ROBERT B. SMITH. AIA iCHITECTURE A PLANNING ROMMENHOEK/MCKEOWN & ASSOCIATES 'IS MORENA BOULEV'ARO SAN OIEGC C^lT0f('4\A 9^" ' n TeleMemo .EPHONF • 7'-1) 2"'fi-77lO v.-1 TH : •S!aJD^Ae DATE. 'Z\ HA^ fe4 >OJECT NO.: g,e,^e,4 T I ME : t ' SO TELE. NO. t 1-458*E^5> 3PY T0><^—r DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES BUILDINQ DEPARTMENT 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD. CA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5525 Citp of Carl^faab CERTIFIED - RETURN RECEIPT February 6, 1984 James A. Besaw 2221 Wimbleton Lane. La Habra, Ca. 90631' 2910 JEFFERSON STREET / APN 203-350-13 A few months ago, during our telephone conversation, you indicated future plans of demolition of the existing building and construction of a new office building. To date, no progress has been made, and we now find ourselves with an attractive nuisance and an eyesore to the immediate neighborhood. This Department would appreciate your immediate cooperation in demolishing and cleanup of said building and property. Failure to comply could result in further legal action. For further infor- mation, please call this office. Thank you. TONY MATA Sr. Bun Idin^ Inspector TM:gl cc: Raymond A. Miller