The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRP 85-06; McComas Medical Professional Building; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (2)r DEVELOPMENTAL IM H 1200 ELM AVENUE SERVICES m'^^J^!^ CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE ^^Ss^T ^^^^^ 438-5591 Citp of taxlihah August 30, 1985 John Mc Comas 1265 Cynthia Lane Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECT: RP 85-6 - Mc Comas Preliminary Staff Report The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project has been completed. A copy of the report, including the recom- mendation and conditions, is enclosed. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (D.C.C.) meeting which will be held on September 3, 1985, beginning at 9:00 a.m. It is necessary that you bring your required colored exhibit(s) with you to this meeting in order for your project to go forward to Planning Commission. If you do not plan to attend this meeting, please make arrangements to have your colored exhibits(s) here by the scheduled time above. If you have any questions concerning the report, you should attend the D.C.C. meeting. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact the Land Use Planning Office at 438-5591. CITY OF CARLSBAD MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Land Use Planning Manager By: M-Z-W Land Use Planning Office MJH:ad Enclosure 00 GO July 5, 1985 Redeveiopment Office 2965 Roosevelt St. Suite B Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attn: Community Redevelopment Manager RE: RP 85-6 - McComas We are presently at this time withdrawing our application for a major Redevelopment Permit (RP 85-6). We will be resubmitting in the future, ROBERT HOLME DEVELOPMENTAL 0 ^^B^ H ^200 ELM AVENUE SERVICES ^L^y^^JM CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE ^^^^T ^^^^^ 438-5591 Citp of Carlsbab June 28, 1985 John Michael McComas 1265 Cynthia Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: RP 85-6 MC COMAS Preliminary Staff Report The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project has been completed. A copy of the report, including the recom- mendation and conditions, is enclosed. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (D.C.C.) meeting which will be held on July 2, 1985, 1985, beginning at 12:00 p.m. If you have any questions concerning the report, you may attend the D.C.C. meeting. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact the Land Use Planning Office at 438-5591. CITY OF CARLSBAD MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Land Use Planning Manager By; ^ Land Use Planning Office MJH:ad Enclosure DEVELOPMENTAL 0 ^SRf^ H ^'-'^ AVENUE SERVICES Ba^W riM CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE (619) 438-5591 Citp of CarliBfbab June 28, 1985 Robert Holmes 810 Caminito Rosa Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: RP 85-6 MC COMAS Preliminary Staff Report The preliminary staff report for the above referenced project has been completed. A copy of the report, including the recom- mendation and conditions, is enclosed. This preliminary report will be discussed by staff at the Development Coordinating Committee (D.C.C.) meeting which will be held on July 2, 1985, beginning at 12:00 p.m. If you have any questions concerning the report, you may attend the D.C.C. meeting. If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact the Land Use Planning Office at 438-5591. CITY OF CARLSBAD MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER Land Use Planning Manager Land Use Planning Office MJH:ad Enclosure DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5591 Citp of CarliBibab April 4, 1985 John McComas 1265 Cynthia Lane Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: RP 85-6 The Director of Building and Planning, the City Engineer and the Land Use Planning Manager have reviewed the application you submitted for the above-referenced project. Based upon this review, it has been determined that there are major problems associated with your application which must be addressed before this application can be scheduled for a Planning Commission hearing. The problems or issues are listed below. Also, the name of the project planner and project engineer is provided. You should set-up a meeting to discuss the issues with the appropriate staff member. Once the problems/issues have been addressed, your application will then be scheduled for a hearing. Problems/issues 1) Setbacks too small 2) Parking doesn't work 3) Additional engineering infor- mation needed. Project Planner ADRIENNE LANDERS ^ Project Engineer DAN CLARK 4) Current title report ; i ^ ^ 1 ; FEE: • $175.00 ' ' RECEIPT NO: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I (To Be Completed by APPLICANT) CASE NO: DATE: Feb/tuoAy. 21, f(j85 Applicant: Michael /^c(W> Address of Applicant: /265 C^nMUa Lone janldbad, (alifo/u ia (j2008 Phone Number: ( 6^ ) 729-^/0 Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): l^one GENERAL INFORMATION; Description of Project: A ^(l fJ:J(^edJLccJj-'fnof.eAAdionaJL btuUdinj^ /Medical A6uiije^ ioweA. fiooA. Office. A^wuieA uppen. fioo/i 262^ ^q. fi, Landdcaping coveAogje ij80 fi, (6 coji payikLnjg.m Siie. acA.eajg.e 0^1^28^^ acAje^» Project Location/Address: 3095 l^'hdUoa Ave. (juvUboxi, (aJJifonnJji 9^008 .^-ssessor Parcel Number: ^^3 - 3^5 - LO Zone of Subject Property: Proposed Use of Site: l^edical^?/tofe/i/iionoJ. BtUddin^ List all other applicable applications related to this project: Environmental Impact Assessments for gradinq permits must be accompanied with a qradincT plan and grading profile. 2 Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man- made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when appropriate. . m 3, Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. EmJjdlnjg. ii/iUl (pnfo/im WiMi ALL (wuieni Quty L^uJJdinjg. (oded And Specificaiion^* 4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. m 5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. m 6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. m 7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. m -2- I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as necessary.) YES NO 1) Could the project significantly change present land uses in the vicinity of the activity? 2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational area, or area of important aesthetic value? ^ 3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? ^ 4) Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? 5) Could the activity increase the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? 6) Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? 7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not found in other parts of the county, state or nation? 8) Could the activity significantly affect an historical or archaeological site or its settings? 9) Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? 10) Does the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? 16) Could the activity serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- ment of already developed areas? XX XX XX XX XX XX XX 11) Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? XX 12) Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity,area? XX 13) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? XX 14) Could the activity change existing features of any of the c?ty's beaches? XX 15) Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination of agricultural lands? XA XX -3- YES NO 17) Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc.)? xX 18) Will the activity require certification, authoriza- tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental.control agency? xX 19) Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the City? xX 20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? XX 21) Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? XX 22) Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? XX 23) Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? XX 24) Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? XX 25) Could the activity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? XX 26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? XX 27) Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the region's air or water resources? (Should note surface, ground water, off-shore.) XX 28) will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? XX 29) Will there be a significant change to existing land form? XX (a) Indicate e^imated grading to be done in cubic yards: /5 cu, (b) Percentage of alteration to the present land form: (% . (c) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes: L21 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets? XX 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger project or series of projects? XA -4- II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: III. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach additional sheets as needed.) Signature ^///i u\f,^ VJH^KSA (Person Completing Report) Date Signed F^mmj 21, 1985 -5- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (To Be Completed by the LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE) CASE NO. ^fer-/^ DATE: I. BACKGROUND 1 . APPLICANT: "^/Tlc G^WUlXL^ 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to b Written Under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) YES MAYBE NO Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO 2. Air - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? / c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? /_ / / h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? -2- YEg MAYBE NO 4. Plant Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? y d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? 7. Light and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? ^' Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? -3- YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilit- ies, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transporation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterbome, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? / ( -4- YE§ MAYBE NO 14, Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? ^5. Energy - Will the proposal have signif- icant results in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? -5- YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view? 19. Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeological/Historical - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed project such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alternate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. -6- YES MAYBE NO 22. Mandatory Findings of Significance - a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION -7- T > DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) -8- IV. DETERMINATION .(To Be Completed by the Land Use Planning Office) )n the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on "the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant 'effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the "environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date Signature V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable) -9- MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued) VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature -10-