The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRP 86-03; Jefferson House II; Redevelopment Permits (RP) (3)TUl $100.00 llECEIPT MC. E^^^/IR0N^1ENTAL IIvIPACT ASSESSMENT FGllM - Part I (To Be Completed By iVPPLICANT) CASE NO. DATE: October 23, 19 85 Applicant' Rick Engineering Company Address of Applicant: 5620 Friars Road, San Diego, CA 92110 Phone Nii]iiber: (619 ) 291-0707 Name, address and phone nuinber of person to be contacted (if other thaL Applicant): Bill Dumka • ' Pi'oject location/address: Southeast corner of intersection of_ Jefferson Street and Home Street Assessor Parcel Number: 230 - 202 - 4, 5, & 6 Zone of subject property: R-P-Q Proposed use of site: Apartment complex for seniors List al]. othor appllcaiile applications related to this project: An appli- cation for a Conditional Use Permit allowing the construction of a residential project for seniors is being submitted. N.I) 1 Desciibe the activ.i ty araa, including distinguishing natural and maniitadG characteristics; also provide preci.se slope analysis v/hen appropriate. At present, there are three houses-on the parcels. One is in use as a residence, one is used for a business, and the third is vacant. 3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. (For a more specific discussion of" energy conservation requirements see ' of the City's SIR Gviidelines) . Energy conservation measures mandated by Section II. of the State Energy Conservation Manual will be incorporated into project design and operation. 4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of •unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. The proposed project will consist of 48 one-bedroom apartments (500 square feet) and 11 two-bedroom apartments (650 square feet). Rents will be approximately $400.00 ' per month. It is estimated that.households will consist of one or two persons. 5. If commercial, indicate the type, whi-ther neic;]?borhocd, city or regionally oriented, square .footage of smiles f~rea, . a .id loading facilities, • N/A 6* If industrial, indicate type, estimated em};;lo\Tient per .f:->hift; cind loading fcicilities. N/A ^ • 7. If institution^ll, indicate the ruajor function, estiniated employraent per shift, e.stimated occupancy, loading facilities, and coiTirauriity benefits to be derived from the project. , . N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AN.?\I,YSIS Answer the follov/ing questions by placing a check in the appropriate splice. (Discuss all items checked yes. Attach additional sheets as necessary).. ' YES • NO 1) Could the project significemtly change present 'land uses in the vicinity of the activity? X 2) Could the activity affect the use of a rec- reational area, or area of important • aesthetic value? - X 3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an established community or neighborhood? jC 4) Could the activity result in the displacement • of community residents? __X__ 5) Could the activity increase the number of lovj •and moderate cost housing units in tho city? X 6) Could the cictivity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? X 7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity area unique, that is, not' found in other parts of the County, State. or Naticn? 8) Could the activity significantly affect a historical or archaeologicctl site or its settings? ' x 9) Could the activity significantly affect thc potential use, extraction, o.r conservation of a scarce natural resource? X 10) Does the activity area serve as a habitat, food source nesting place, source of W£rl.:er, etc., for rare o.r endangered wildlife on fish species? X 11) Could thc activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? X 12) Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity arca?^ ^ x 13) Could tlie acti.vity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tj.delands? X' 14) Couid the activity change existing foatures of any of the city's beaches? 15) Could the activity result in the erosion or elimination of agricultural lands? X X 16) Could the activity serve to encourage develop- ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify development of already developed areas? ______ ^ 17) Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, w£iter, ' X^ noise, etc)? " • 18) Will the activity require certification, • • authorization or issuance of a permit by any local, state or federal environmental control agency? • X_ 19) Will the activity require iss^^^^^t-^p of a variance or (conditional use permr^by the city? X 20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal cf potentially hazardous materials? X 23.) . Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? ' \ • X 22) VJill thc activity involve construction of . facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? _ _JL___ 23) V7ill the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? . ___x^ 24) ' Could the activity result in the generation . of significant amounts of noise? ' ' ' X 25) Could the cictivity result in the gener^ition of significcuit arnoun'ts of dust? " " X 26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? ^ 27} Could the activity result in a significant change in tke qiu-ility of any por-tion of the region's air or v;ater resources? (Should note, surface, ground water, off--shore) . „ ' ' X- 28) Wil] the project substantially increase fuel consumption (eleci:r:i city, oil, natural gas, etc.)? __X 29) Vvill there be a • significant change to exist.i.ng land form? - • X (a) indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards 20.0 cubic yards (balanced on-site)__ (b) percentage of alteration to the present land form . 0 . (c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes • N/A ; _^ 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sev7ers, drains, or streets? X 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger projeci: or series of projects? X ^5- n. STAlBiFNT OF N0N--SIGNIF:CA>-IT IWII^Or^ItNm EFFECTS If you have a.nswered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you th.ink the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: The project will displace residents of one house presently on the lot. This is not considered a significant impact due to the fact that the project is replacing this use with 59 low-cost units for a segment of the population with a substantial need for such housing. III. COM^IFNTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ,AN\^ OF IIIE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for ansvjering any questions attach additional sheets as may be needed). Signature [Person conifleting reporty William R. Graham Date Signed October 23, 1985 -6- DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE PLANNING OFFICE 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008-1989 (619) 438-5591 Citp of Carlgbab NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/UXIATION: The project is located at the southeast corner of the Jefferson Street/Home Avenue intersection. PROJECT INSCRIPTION: Ohis project, RP/CUP 86-3 will include a 59 unit senior citizens ^>artment project over .79 acre in the V-R zone. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implonentation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant inpact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA. 92008. Comments frcm the pi±>lic are invited. Please submit cannents in writing to the Planning Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. DATED: February 22, 1986 CASE NO: RP/CUP 86-3 APPLICANT: Jefferson House II PUBLISH DATE: February 22r 1986 MICHAEL J. Planning Director ND4 11/85