HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 88-06; KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN DRIVE-THRU; Redevelopment Permits (RP)( ity of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
(619) U38-1161
No Fee
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MINOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT
Complete Description of Project (attach additional sheets If necessary)
Drive thru addition to existing Kentucky Fried Chicken Restaurant
Location of Project
745 Elm Street, Carlsbad, CA
Legal Description (complete)
Lots 11, 12,13,14,15, and 16 in Block 48 of Carlsbad Townsite, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 535, filed in
the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2, 1888
Local Facility Management Zone
Zone 1
Assessors Parcel Number
203-351-18
Zone
C2
General Plan
Central Business District
Existing Land Use
Restaurant
Proposed Zone
Same
Proposed General Plan
Same
Site Acreage
18,900 SF
Owner Applicant
Name (Print or Type)
Kentucky Fried Chicken
Name (Print or Type)
Pamela Grudek
Mailing Address
3750 S. Susan Street, #100
Mailing Address
3750 S. Susan St. #100
City and State Zip
Santa Ana Calif. 92704
Telephone
714/241-0811
City and State Zip
Santa Ana, Ca 92704
Telephone
714/241-0811
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER
AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION
IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE.
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER'S
REPRESENTATIVE AND THAT ALL
THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE
AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE.
SICNATURE ^.--^^SIGNATURE
R^eived By
DATE
Date Application Rec'd Fees Rejceived
PROJECT NUMBER (S)
Receipt No,
DISCLOSURE FORM
APPLICANT
ACENT:
MEMBERS:
Kentucky Fried Chicken
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
3750 S. Susan St. #100, Santa Ana, CA 92704
Business Address ~~ ~ "
714/241-0811
Telephone Number
Pamela Grudek, Construction Engineer
Name
3750 S. Susan St. #100, Santa Ana, CA 92704
Business Address
714/241-0811
Telephone Number
Name (Individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We understand that if this project is located in the Coastal Zone, 1/we will apply
for Coastal Commission Approval prior to development.
I/We acknowledge that in the process of reviewing this application, it may be
necessary for members of City Staff, Planning Commissioners, Design Review Board
members, or City Council members to inspect and enter the property that is the
subject of this application. I/We consent to entry for this purpose.
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this disclosure
is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon
as being true and correct until amended.
BY
Pamela Grudek , Kentucky Fried
Chicken APPLICANT
Agent, Owner, Partner
City pf Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
' (619) 438-1161
No Fee
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT
Complete Description of Project (attach additional sheets if necessary)
Redesign existing parking and site layout to add an addition of
approximately 60 sq. ft. of drive thru addition.
Location of Project
745 Elm Street, Carlsbad, CA
Legal Description (complete)
Local Facility Management Zone Assessors Parcel Number
Zone General Plan Existing Land Use
Proposed Zone Proposed General Plan Site Acreage
Owner Applicant
Name (Print or Type)
Kentucky Fried Chicken
Name (Print or Type)
Pamela Grudek/Construction Engineer
Mailing Address
3750 S. Susan ST. #100
Mailing Address
Same
City and State
Santa Ana, CA
Zip Telephone
92704 714/241-0811
City and State Zip
Same
Telephone
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER
AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION
IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE.
I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER'S
REPRESENTATIVE AND THAT ALL
THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE
AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE DATE
Date Application Rec'd Received By Fees Received
PROJECT NUMBER (S)
AGENT:
DISCLOSURE FORM
APPLICANT: Pamela Grudek for Kentucky Fried Chicken
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndication)
3750 S. Susan St. #100, Santa Ana, CA 92704
Business Address ~~ ~~~~
714/241-0811
Telephone Number
Pamela Grudek
Name
Same
Business Address
Telephone Number
MEMBERS: NA
Name (individual, partner, joint Home Address
venture, corporation, syndication)
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
Name Home Address
Business Address
Telephone Number Telephone Number
(Attach more sheets if necessary)
I/We understand that if this project is located in the Coastal Zone, 1/we will apply
for Coastal Commission Approval prior to development.
1/We acknowledge that in the process of reviewing this application, it may be
necessary for members of City Staff, Planning Commissioners, Design Review Board
members, or City Council members to inspect and enter the property that is the
subject of this application. I/We consent to entry for this purpose.
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this disclosure
is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be relied upon
as being true and correct until amended.
Pamela Grudek
APPLICANT
BY
Agent, Owner, Partner
FEE: $175.00
RECEIPT NO:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - Part I
(To Be Completed by APPLICANT)
CASE NO: W/rUP ^^^(P
DATE: 10-^-%
Applicant: Kentucky Fried Chicken
Address of Applicant: 745 Elm Street, Carlsbad, CA
Office: 3750 S. Susan St. #100, Santa Ana, CA 92704
Phone Number: ( 714 ) 241-0811
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than
Applicant): Pamela Grudek, Construction Engineer , 714/241-0811
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Description of Project: Revise site layout and addition of approximately
60 sq. ft. of exterior drive thru addition.
Project Location/Address: 745 Elm Street, Carlsbad, CA
Assessor Parcel Number:
Zone of Subject Property:
Proposed Use of Site: Existing restaurant, add drive thru addition
List all other applicable applications related to this project:
Coastal Permit, Public Facilities, Major Revdevelopment Permit
2. Describe the activity area, including distiguishing natural and man-
made characteristics; also provide precise slope analysis when
appropriate.
Existing Kentucky Fried Chicken Restaurant
3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design
and/or operation of the project.
NA
4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes,
range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected.
NA
5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or
regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities.
City oriented. Main area of commercial Carlsbad, approximately
2300 sq. ft. of sales area, no loading facilities required
6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and
loading facilities.
NA
7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per
shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits
to be derived from the project.
NA
-2-
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate
space. (Discuss all items checked "yes". Attach additional sheets as
necessary.)
YES NO
1) Could the project significantly change present
land uses in the vicinity of the activity?
2) Could the activity affect the use of a recreational
area, or area of important aesthetic value?
3) Could the activity affect the functioning of an
established community or neighborhood?
4) Could the activity result in the displacement of
community residents?
10) Does the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource?
14) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches?
15) Could the activity result in the erosion or
elimination of agricultural lands?
XX
XX
XX
XX
5) Could the activity increase the number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city? xx
6) Could the activity decrease the number of low and
modest cost housing units in the city? xx
7) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the
activity area unique, that is, not found in other
parts of the county, state or nation? xx
8) Could the activity significantly affect an
historical or archaeological site or its settings? xx
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation of a
scarce natural resource? xx
XX
11) Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life? xx
12) Are there any rare or endangered plant species
in the activity area? xx
13) Could the activity change existing features of
any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? xx
XX
XX
16) Could the activity serve to encourage development
of presently undeveloped areas or intensify develop- xx
ment of already developed areas?
-3-
YES NO
17) Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water,
noise, etc.)? xx
18) Will the activity require certification, authoriza-
tion or issuance of a permit by any local, state or
federal environmental control agency? xx
19) Will the activity require issuance of a variance
or conditional use permit by the City? xx
20) Will the activity involve the application, use, or
disposal of potentially hazardous materials? xx
21) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain?
25) Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of dust?
26) Will the activity involve the burning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
27) Could the activity result in a significant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's air
or water resources? (Should note surface, ground
water, off-shore.)
28) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)?
29) Will there be a significant change to existing
land form?
(a) Indicate estimated grading to be done in
cubic yards: na .
(b) Percentage of alteration to the present
land form: ^ .
(c) Maximum height of cut or fill slopes:
.
30) Will the activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, sewers, drains or streets?
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a larger
project or series of projects?
-4-
XX
22) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault? xx
23) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? xx
24) Could the activity result in the generation of
significant amounts of noise? xx
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
II. STATEMENT OF NON-SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section
I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental
effects, indicate your reasons below:
This project required a city permit and coastal permit due to city
traffice regulations and the fact that the project is within the coastal
limits; however, the project has no adverse affects on the enviroment.
Ill. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions, attach
additional sheets as needed.)
o-!«r,^i..,-« Pamela Grudek, Construction Engineer/!y h U , )
Signature KrjBmi^<<^'<(rilK
(Person Completing Report)
Date Signed September 28, 1988
-5^
Mail to: State Clearinghouse, UOO Tenth Street, Rm. 121, Sacramento, CA 95814 -- 916/445-0613
I 1
NOTICE OF COHPLETION AND ENVIRONNENTAL DOCUNENT FORN | See NOTE Belou: |
I SCH * I
1. Project Title KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN
2. Lead Agency: CARLSBAD
3a. Street Address: 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE
3. Contact Person: CHRIS DECERBO
3b. City: CARLSBAD
3c. County: SAN DIEGO 3d. Zip: 92009 3e. Phone: 619-438-1161
PROJECT LOCATION 4. County: SAN DIEGO 4a. City/Community: CITY OF CARLSBAD
4b.(optional) Assessor's Parcel No. 20335118 4c. Section: Twp. Range
For Rural,
5a. Cross Streets: MADISON/JEFFERSON STREET 5b. Nearest Community:,
6. Within 2 miles of: a. State Hwy No. 1-5 b. Airports PALOMAR
DOCUMENT TYPE 8. LOCAL ACTION TYPE
c. Waterways PACIFIC OCEAN
10. DEVELOPMENT TYPE
CEQA
01 NOP
02 Early Cons
03 J(_ Neg Dec
04 Draft EIR
05 Supplement/
Subsequent EIR
(if so, prior SCH #
)
NEPA
06 Notice of Intent
07 Envir. Assessment/
FONSI
08 Draft EIS
OTHER
09 Information Only
10 Final Document
11 Other:
01 General Plan Update 01
02 New Element 02
03 General Plan Amendment
04 Master Plan 03
05 Annexation
06 Specific Plan 04
07 X Redevelopment
08 Rezone 05
09 Land Division 06
(Subdivision, Parcel Map.
Tract Map, etc.) 07
10 Use Permit 08
11 Cancel Ag Preserve 09
12 _X_ Other COND USE PERMIT
AND COAST DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 10
9 TOTAL ACRES: 18.900 SF
Residential: Units Acres
Office: Sq. Ft.
Acres Employees
Shopping/Commercial: Sq.Ft.
Acres Employees
Industrial: Sq. Ft,
Acres
Sewer: MGD
Water: MGD
Employees
Transportation: Type
Mineral Extraction: Mineral
Power Generation: Wattage
Type:
Other: DRIVE THROUGH FACILITY
11. PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT
01 Aesthetic/Visual 08
02 Agricultural Land 09
03 Air Quality 10
04 Archaeological/Historical/ 11
Paieontological 12
05 Coastal 13
06 Fire Hazard 14
07 Flooding/Drainage
12 FUNDING (approx.) Federal $
Geologic/Seismic 15
Jobs/Housing Balance 16
Minerals 17
Noise 18
Public Services 19
Schools 20
Septic Systems 21
State $
Sewer Capacity 22
Soil Erosion 23
Sol id Waste 24
Toxic/Hazardous 25
Traffic/Circulation 26
Vegetation 27
Water Quality 28
Total $
Water Supply
Wet Iand/R i par i an
WiIdlife
Growth Inducing
Incompatible Landuse
Cumulative Effects
Other
13 PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING: CBD (Central Busmess District)
VR (Village Redevelopment)
14 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A Redevelopment Permit/Conditional Use Permit/Coa&tal Development Permit to add a drive-
through facililty to an existing Kenttjoky Fr had/Chicken restaurant. 2/ fl
15. SIGNATURE OF LEAD AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: \^^J\Jt^ WCX-PU(J Date: 10^ t>l C
NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects If a SCH Number already exists for a
project (e.g. from a Notice of Preparation or previous draft document) please fill it in.
REVIEWING AGENCIES
.Resources Agency
_Air Resources Board
.Conservation
_Fish and Game
_CoastcLL Ccmimission
Caltrans District
.Callirans - Planning
.Caltrans - Aeronautics
.California Hi^iway Patirol
.Boating and Waterways
.Forestxy
.State Water Resources Oontirol
Board - Headcjuarters
.Regional Water Quality Control
Board, Region
.Division of Water Ri^ts (SWI^)
.Division of Water Quality (SWRCB)
_D^)artment of Water Resources
.Reclamation Board
.Solid Waste Management Board
Colorado River Board
CTRPA (CalTRPA)
TRPA (Tahoe RPA)
Bay Conservation & Dev't Coram
Paries and Recreation
Office of Historic Preservation
Native American Heritage Ccram
State Tand.q Ccram
Public Utilities Coram
Energy Coram
Food and Agriculture
Health Services
Statewide Health Planning (hospitals)
Housing and Coraraunity Dev't
Corrections
General Services
Office of local Assistance
Public Works Board
Office of i^ropriate Tech. (OFR)
Local Government Unit (OFR)
Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy
Other
Date Received at SCH_
Date Review Starts
Date to Agencies
Date to SCH
Clearance Date
Notes:
FOR SCH USE OtfLY
Catalog Number
Pn^xDnent
Consultant,
Contact
Address
Fhone
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. RP/CUP 88-6/CDP 88-6
DATE: October 26. 1988
I. BACKGROUND
1. APPLICANT: KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN
2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 3750 S. SUSAN STREET
SUITE #100. SANTA ANA, CA 92704
714-241-0811
3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: OCTOBER 7. 1988
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written
under Section III - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Unstable earth conditions
or in changes in geologic
substructures? X_
b. Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering
of the soil? X_
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features? X
d. The destruction, covering of
modification of any unicjue
geologic or physical features? X.
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or
off the site? X
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel or a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X_
YES MAYBE NO
2. Air - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? X
b. The creation of objectionable
odors? X
c. Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally? X
3. Water - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters? X_
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patters, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff? X_
c. Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters? X_
d. Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body? X_
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water (juality, including but not
limited to, temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? X.
f. Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters? X.
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations? X.
h. Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies? X.
-2-
YES MAYBE NO
4. Plant Life - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and acjuatic plants)? X_
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants? X_
c. Introduction of new species of plants
into an area, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species? X_
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop? X_
5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)? X_
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unicjue,
rare or endangered species of animals? X_
c. Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of
animals? X_
d. Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly
increase existing noise levels? X_
7. Liqht and Glare - Will the proposal sig-
nificantly produce new light or glare? X_
8. Land Use - Will the proposal have
significant results in the alteration of
the present or planned land use of an
area? X_
-3-
YES MAYBE NO
9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources? X
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource? X
10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident
or upset conditions? X
11. Population - Will the proposal signif-
icantly alter the location, distribu-
tion, density, or growth rate of the
human population of an area? X_
12. Housinq - Will the proposal signif-
icantly affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? X_
13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the
proposal have significant results in:
a. Generation of additional vehicular
movement? X_
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking? X_
c. Impact upon existing transportation
systems? X_
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? X_
e. Alterations to waterbome, rail or
air traffic? X_
f. Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? X_
-4-
YES MAYBE NO
14. Public Services - Will the proposal have
a significant effect upon, or have signif-
icant results in the need for new or
altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection? X.
b. Police protection? X.
c. Schools? X
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? X
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? X_
f. Other governmental services? X_
15. Enerqy - Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? X_
b. Demand upon existing sources of
energy, or recjuire the development
of new sources of energy? X_
16. Utilities - Will the proposal have
significant results in the need for new
systems, or alterations to the following
utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? X_
b. Communications systems? X_
c. Water? X_
d. Sewer or septic tanks? X_
e. Storm water drainage? X_
f. Solid waste and disposal? X_
17. Human Health - Will the proposal have
significant results in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health
hazard (excluding mental health)? X.
-5-
YES MAYBE NO
18. Aesthetics - Will the proposal have
significant results in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal result in
creation of an aesthetically offensive
public view?
19. Recreation - Will the proposal have
significant results in the impact upon
the quality or (quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? X_
20. Archeoloqical/Historical/Paleontoloqical
- Will the proposal have significant
results in the alteration of a significant
archeological, paieontological or
historical site, structure, object or
building? X_
21. Analyze viable alternatives to the proposed proiect such as:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter-
nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative,
a) N/A
b) Because of the existing site layout, alternate site designs are
not feasible.
c) The proposed drive through has been designed to meet minimum
design standards.
d) N/A Since the site is already developed with a Kentucky Fried
Chicken Restaurant.
e) Development at some future time would have no effect in that the
restaurant currently exists.
f) N/A
g) Impacts would be the same in that the site is already developed
with a Kentucky Fried Chicken Restaurant.
-6-
YES MAYBE NO
22. Mandatory findings of siqnificance -
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, or curtail the diversity
in the environment? X
b. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) X_
c. Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A
project may impact on two or more
separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is
significant.) }
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? X
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
This project would entail the construction of a drive through
facility on an already existing Kentucky Fried Chicken Restaurant
site. As part of the proposal, the existing restaurant parking lot
would be redesigned. For this environmental analysis, staff
conducted two field trips to the property. There are no sensitive
environmental resources open or vithin close proximity to this
already developed site. Because the site; (1) is currently
developed, (2) is located in an urban area, and (3) no sensitive
resources existing on or in close proximity to it. No significant
environmental impacts are anticipated. There were no public comments
received during the public review period for this negative
declaration.
-7-
IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
.1 find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is recjuired.
Date Signature
( Date Planrvinq Dkector
V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
-8-
MITIGATING MEASURES (Continued)
VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
MJH:CD/lh
A:\EIA.KFC
-9-
COASTAL DBVKLOPNBBT PBKMIT
SUPPLBMBVTAL APPLZCATIOll
This Supplemental Application is to be filed for:
A. Any development requiring a Coastal Development
Permit issued by the City of Carlsbad, or
B. Any development which requires a California Coastal
Commission Coastal Oevelopment Permit.
Please answer all questions. Where questions do not apply,
please indicate *not applicable* or *N/A".
1 . General Background
A. Has any application for a development on this site been
submitted previously to the California Coastal
Commission?
( ) Yes (x) No
If yesr state previous California Coastal Commission
Coastal Development Permit application number
B. Do yo wish to apply for:
1 . An Administrative Coastal Development Permit ^
2. A Regular Coastal Development Permit
3. A California Coastal Commission Coastal Development
Permit
C. Please provide the street address of this proposed
developraent 745 Elm Street, Carlsbad, CA
D. Please provide the Assessor's Parcel Number of this
proposed development
S. Please identify tlu^: the proposed development is
located on the (N^S/E/W - Cirlce One) side of FI^ si-rppt
between and
Please describe the present land uses (i.e. Vacant
land, single family homes, apartments, offices, etc.)
surrounding the proposed development to the:
North:
South:
East:
West: /
Form: PD:LCP #5 1 of 5
2. Present Ose of property
A) Are there existing structures on the property?
(xx) Yea ( ) NO
If yes,, please describe.
Existing Kentucky Fried Chicken Restaurant
B) Will any existing structure be demolished? ( ) Yes (X)
Will any existing structures be removed? ( ) Yes (x ) NO
If yes to either question, describe the type of development
to be demolished or removed, including the relocation site,
if applicable.
3. Development Description:
A) Estimated cost of development: Land NA
Improvements $40,000
B) Project height: Maximum height of structure
ft.
Naximum height of structure as measured
from centeriine of frontage road
ft.
C) Total number of floors in structure, including
subterranean floors, lofts, and mezzanines One
0) Gross floor area including covered parking and accessory
buildings 64 sg. ft. sq. ft.
Gross floor area excluding paricing
sq. ft.
E) Lot area (within property lines) 18,900 sq.
ft. or acres
2 of 5
LOT COVERAGES
TOTAL 20
Existing New Proposed Total
Building Coverage 1,972 sq.ft. 36 sq.ft. 2,008
Paved Area 14,374 sq. ft. 13,752 sq.ft. 13,752
Landscaped Area 3,755 sq.ft. 303 sq. ft. 4,058
(7nifflproved Area
(left natural) NA so. ft. NA sq. ft. NA
P) Parking: number of existing spaces 20
.sq.ft,
.sq.ft.
.sq.ft.
.sq.ft.
number of covered spaces
number of uncovered spac^
number of standard spaces_
number of compact spaces
0
14 ML siie 8.5'X^O'
5 si»e 8' X 15'
Is tandem parking existing ( ) Yes * (X) No
proposed ( ) Yes # (X) No
G) If land is to be subdivided, number of lots to be
created and size:
Lot Symbol No. of Lots Lot Size
NA
H) If the development is residential, please state:
NA number of dwelling units
number of bedrooms per dwelling unit
type of occupancy proposed: ( )
( )
( )
( )
rental
stock cooperative
time share
other
4. Grade Alteration;
Is any grading proposed?
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
amount of cut
amount of fill
maximum height of fill slope
maximum height of cut slope_
amount of import or export
location of borrow or disposal site
( ) Yes
( X) No
If yes, please complete the
following:
cu. yds.
_c u. y d s.
_ft.
ft.
cu.yds.
3 of 5
Grading and drainage plans must be included with this
application. in certain areas, an engineering geology report
must also be included. Consult the City Engineering
Departnent representative for a determination.
5. otility Extensions;
Are utility extensions for the following, proposed to serve
the project?
a) water ( ) Yes (^) NO
b) gas ( ) Yes (^) NO
c) electric ( ) Yes (^> NO.
Above Ground Extensions
d) sewer ( ) Yes ( ^ No
e) telephone ( ) Yes (X) NO
If yes, to any of the above, would extensions be above
ground?
( ) Yes (X) No
6. Development on Public Trust Lands;
ig, fi
waters, wetiands.
Does the development involve diking, filling, dredging or
placing any structures in open coastal waters, wetland!
estuaries, or lakes?
a) diking ( ) yes ( X) No
b) filling ( ) yes (x) No
c) dredging ( ) Yes (x) No
d) placement of structures ( ) Yes (x) No
e) Amount of material to be dredged or filled
cu.yds.
f) Location of dredged material disposal site NA
g) Has a U. S. Army Corps of Engineers' permit been applied
for? ( ) Yes ) No
h) Will the development extend onto or adjoin any beach,
tidelands, submerged lands or public trust lands? (See
Definitions section) ( ) Yes ( x) No
Por projects on State-owned lands, additional
information may be required. Consult the staff
representative in the Planning Department.
7. Sensitive Resources:
Does the proposed development contain:
a) a sensitive habitat area ( ) Yes (x) No (a biological
survey may be required)
b) a 100-year floodplain ( ) Yes ( ^) No (hydrologic mapping
may be required)
c) a park or recreation area ( ) Yes (x ) No
d) Historic resources ( ) Yes (^) No
4 of 5
e) archaeological resources ( ) Yes (^) No
f) paieontological resources ( ) Yes (^) No
If yea to any of the above, please explain on an attached
sheet.
g) Would the development in any way alter or divert a stream
bed or drainage course?
If yes, please describe on a separate sheet of paper.
Coastal Access;
a) Will the development protect existing lower-cost visitor
and recreation facilities? ( ) Yes (x)
If yes, explain
b) Will the development provide public or private
recreational opportunities? ( ) Yes (x) No
If yes, explain
Is the proposed development:
a) Visible from any park, beach, or recreation area
( ) Yes (x) No (A viewshed analysis may be required)
b) Within the viewshed from any public or quasi public
place (i.e. public roads, ( x) Yes ( ) No
commercial sites, public or private recreation areas,
etc.) to a visual coastal resource.
9. If the development is between the first public road and the
sea, is public access to the shoreline and along the coast
currently available near the site? ( ) Yes ( ) No
If yes, indicate the location of the nearby access, including
the distance from the site.
Under certain circumstances, additional material or
documents may be required prior...'-^ issuance of a Coastal
Development Permit. »^ 4,
8/^3/Bg) Mai¥i^gr£5llf aiifetion Engineer
Date Signature of Applicant or
Authorized Agent
5 of 5
SPECIFiC REQUIREMENTS
1. Coastal Development Permit Supplemental Application Form.
2. Property Owner's List and Addressed Labels
- A typewritten list of the names and addresses of all property
owners and occupants within a 600 foot radius of subject property
(including the applicant and/or owner). The list shall include
the San Diego County Assessor's parcel number from the latest
assessment rolls.
- Two (2) separate sets of mailing labels of the property owners
and occupants within a 600 foot radius of subject property.
For any address other than single family residence, apartment
or suite number MUST be included. DO NOT TYPE ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER ON LABELS. Applicant must submit separate
check to cover cost of postage.
(Only a 100 foot radius of property owners and occupants need
be done for Administrative Coastal Development Permits)
3. 600 Foot Radius Map
A map to scale not less than 1" = 200' showing each lot within
600 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. Each
of these lots shall be consecutively numbered and correspond with
the property owner's list. The scale of the map may be reduced
to a scale acceptable to the Planning Director if the required scale
is impractical.
(Only a 100 foot radius map need be done for an Administrative
Coastal Development Permit)
4. Preliminary Title Report (current within the last six months)
)' from well on d|^X^^
Potential Public Trust Land
i
1
Hording St
1 MHmnon St
1 Modteon St
1
f
< 1
Tylar St
Uncoln St
GorfloM St
AREA INOLUDED IN REDEVELOPMENT COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT